Prompt Design Experiment
Prompt Design Experiment
Experiment Setup:
Goal: Use each prompt technique (zero-shot, few-shot, and chain-of-thought) to solve the problem.
1. Zero-Shot Prompt:
Task: Find the area under the curve f(x) = x^2 from x = 1 to x = 3.
Response: The area under the curve can be found by integrating f(x) = x^2 over the interval from x =
1 to x = 3. The integral of x^2 is x^3/3. Evaluating from 1 to 3: 3^3/3 - 1^3/3 = 9 - 1/3 = 26/3. The
area is 26/3.
2. Few-Shot Prompt:
Examples:
Example 1: Find the area under the curve f(x) = 2x from x = 1 to x = 4. Answer: 15.
Example 2: Find the area under the curve f(x) = 3x^2 from x = 0 to x = 2. Answer: 8.
Task: Find the area under the curve f(x) = x^2 from x = 1 to x = 3.
Response: The model correctly follows the examples to solve the task, outputting the correct result.
Effectiveness: The examples improved the response, but there's still a lack of explanation.
3. Chain-of-Thought Prompt:
Task: Find the area under the curve f(x) = x^2 from x = 1 to x = 3.
Response:
1. To find the area, we compute the definite integral of f(x) = x^2 over [1, 3].
Effectiveness: Step-by-step reasoning helped the model clearly explain each part, improving clarity
and accuracy.
Analysis of Effectiveness:
Zero-Shot: Quick and efficient for simple tasks, but lacks reasoning or explanation for complex
problems.
Few-Shot: Useful for tasks that benefit from pattern recognition through examples, but might still
lack clarity.
Chain-of-Thought: Ideal for tasks requiring deep reasoning, where step-by-step explanation leads to
Conclusion:
Choosing the right prompting technique depends on the task. For simple queries, zero-shot may
suffice, while few-shot works well for tasks needing examples. Chain-of-thought is most effective for