Chapter 4
Chapter 4
Special Functions
d nm
nm ( )
1
n
2 n!
1 2
m/2
d nm
2 1
n
(4. 1)
The special case of nm ( ) where m0 gives rise to the Legendre
polynomial n 0 ( ) to be determined is called Rodrigues’ formula. It is
simply denoted by n ( ) .
1 dn
n ( ) n 0 ( ) n
2 n! d n
2 1
n
(4. 2)
Because m0, there is no square root, that is, no sin . Therefore, the n ( )
1
0 (cos ) 1
(4. 3)
1 (cos ) cos
Where the cosine value of the geocentric angle between the two field
points r1 and r2 is given by
r1 r2
cos and r2 r1 (4. 6)
r1 r2
2
4.2 Dirac Delta Function
(t )dt 1 (4. 8)
0 t0
1
(t ) 0t (4. 9)
0 t 0
F (t ) (t a)dt F (a) (4. 10)
3
lim F (a ) F (a) (4. 12)
0
then ( x x) 1
(u u)
det xi / u j
In spherical coordinate:
x r sin cos , y r sin sin , z r cos (4. 15)
det xi / u j r 2 sin
So the determinant, , hence the Dirac delta function
has the following form,
1
( x x) (r r) ( ) ( ) (4. 16)
r sin
2
4
digital equipment we must first approximately replace the continuous
operand with finite and discrete numerical parameters. The results of
numerical computation give information about the consequence of
differentiation, integration, etc. from the result of computation (which
again consists of finite number of parameters).
For such finite number of parameters we use, in many cases, function
values (sample values) at discrete values of the independent variable
(sample points). Sometimes we also use coefficients of an expansion in
terms of some suitable set of functions (e.g., power series or the Fourier
series). However, in order to express a function in sufficiently high
precision with a relatively small number of parameters it is required that
the function is moderately smooth (or natural).
Although in many books the requirement on the smoothness is not so
explicitly mentioned, it is implicitly included in the error representation
of the numerical formula. In fact, in many cases the error representation
of numerical formulas includes the maximum absolute value of the nth
order derivative of the function in question (n is determined depending on
the formula), and hence it is implicitly assumed that the function is n-
times differentiable and that its n-th order derivative is not very large.
5
many cases in which the analyticity can actually be proved in some
explicitly given region. This is obviously the case if the function is defined
explicitly in an analytical form.
Also, to investigate what kind of analyticity the function has, or in
other words, where and what kind of singularities exist in the complex
plane, is an important subject in the field of geomatics, geophysics and
engineering. In general, it is more realistic to study in what region the
function is regular rather than to establish the n times differentiability. If
we base our argument on the analyticity of the function in this way, the
complex function theory, in particular Cauchy’s integral formula will
play a fundamental role.
Complex Algebra
r z x2 y 2 - the modulus or magnitude of z
1/ 2
6
tan1 ( y / x) - the argument or phase of z
Fig. 4.1
z1 z2 x1 x2 i y1 y2
(4. 17)
z1 z2 x1 x2 y1 y2 i x1 y2 x2 y2
z1 z2 r1r2 ei 1 2
z n r n ei n (4. 18)
z1 / z2 r1 / r2 ei 1 2
7
z* x iy (4. 19)
z* z x 2 y 2 z
2
Note that
All the elementary functions of real variables may be extended into the
complex plane by replacing the real variable by the complex variable z.
f ( x) f ( z )
ex ez
(4. 20)
sin x sin z
ln x ln z
Note that
If to each value which a complex variable z can assume if there exists their
corresponding one or more values of a complex variable w, we say that w
is a function of z and it may be written as
w f (z ) (4. 22)
w f ( z) u( x, y) i v( x, y) (4. 23)
v
y Z-plane
u
x
Fig. 4.2
with z (or z0 ) some point in a plane, our requirement that the limit be
independent of the direction of approach is very restrictive.
Consider
9
z x iy
f u iv (4. 25)
f u iv
z x iy
Let us take limit by the two different approaches as in the figure. First,
with y = 0, we let x0,
f u v
lim lim i
z 0 z x 0 x x
(4. 26)
u v
i
x x
Fig.4.3
f u v
lim lim i
z 0 z y 0
y y (4. 27)
u v
i
y y
If the derivative of the complex function f(z) exists, the real and imaginary
parts of the derivatives taken in the horizontal and vertical directions must
be equal. That is equations (4.26) and (4.27) must be identical.
10
u v
(4. 28)
y x
u v
(4. 29)
x y
f ( z ) z zz*
2
2) is nowhere analytic
Harmonic Functions
equation (4.28) with respect to y and equation (4.29) with respect to x and
add the results, we obtain
11
2u 2 u
0 (4. 30)
x 2 y 2
2v 2v
0 (4. 31)
x 2 y 2
Thus we see that the real and imaginary parts of an analytic function w(z)
of a complex variable are solutions of the two-dimensional Laplace’s
equation. Equally, w(z) itself is a solution to Laplace’s equation. These
are commonly used in potential field geodesy, geophysics and fluid
dynamic.
u
v( x, y) dy C ( x) (4. 32)
x
a) u( x, y) y 3 3x 2 y and
b) u( x, y) e y sin x
12