COMPREHENSIVE SCHOOL SAFETY MONITORING TOOL

BASELINE
2024 BASELINE DATA

Name of School: # of Teaching Personnel:

School ID: # of Non-Teaching Personnel:
District: # of Learners:

DepEd DRRMS CSS INDICATORS

Related Sendai
Global Comprehensive
Framework for If YES, present MOVs/ If NO
School Safety (CSS)
DRR (SFDRR) state your PLAN/ TARGETS
TARGET AREAS
Priorities (Based on DepEd’s DRRM Policies and School
Yes (2024)NO
DRRM Manual)
ENABLING ENVIRONMENT
Priority for Action 2 Legal Frameworks & Policies 1 Adopted/Adapted/localized
in education/school safety
existing policies relating to DRRM

2 Designated School DRRM Focal Person

Organizational arrangements,
Priority for Action 2 leadership, and coordination for Formed School DRRM Team, consisting of personnel from
risk reduction and resilience 3 different offices; with defined membership and roles and
responsibilities/functions

Has a comprehensive School DRRM Plan, which includes

4 CCA and EiE measures, covering risk assessment, risk
Integration of risk reduction reduction, and rehabilitation and recovery
Priority for Action 1 and resilience into education
sector strategies, policies and 5 Students participated in the planning process
plans
6 Integrated DRRM into the School Improvement Plan (SIP)

7 100% completion of DRR related questions in the EMIS/EBEIS

8 Regular DRRM activities are supported by school budget

9 Funding sources for interventions in the aftermath of a disaster

or emergency exist and can easily be tapped.
Priority for Action 3 Funding for risk reduction and
resilience of education sector
10 School has partnerships that could be tapped to support its
DRRM programs and activities, including those after a disaster

11 Conducted student-led school watching and hazard mapping

(DO 23 s 2015)
Incorporated results of student-led school watching and
12 hazard mapping in the School DRRM Plan and SIP

Priority for Action 1 Child-centered Risk

Assessment 13 Linked student-led school watching and hazard mapping with
the community hazard maps of LGUs provided by DOST

14 School Planning Team have linked the community hazard

maps with education data to better understand the school’s risk

School submitted Rapid Assessment of Damage Report

15 (RADAR) to the DRRMS Central Office, within 72 hours after
the onslaught of a hazard in the area
Data collection and consolidation of programs and activities on
Priority for Action 3 Monitoring and Evaluation 16 DRRM, covering the 3 Pillars, to monitor results and impact
exist
PILLAR 1: SAFE LEARNING FACILITIES
Existing schools are being made safer, systematically Number TARGETS/ PLANS
1 # of school buildings that has been inventoried
Assessment and prioritization
Priority for Action 1 for retrofiting and replacement 2 # of school buildings with risk assessment
of unsafe schools
3 # of unsafe school buildings identified
BASELINE
PILLAR 1: SAFE LEARNING FACILITIES TARGETS/ PLANS
YES NO
Systems for monitoring and quality assurance of school
4 building construction exist
Financial resources are allocated for completion of needed
5 action to address unsafe school buildings within a specified
Priority for Action 3 Resources and Plan to address
unsafe school buildings
period
Number of unsafe school buildings with appropriate action
6 undertaken by the School Head (e.g. upgraded, retrofitted,
non-usage, etc.)
Conducted regular school inspection and maintenance of
7 facilities conducted (state how often)
Undertaken regular repair of minor classroom (including
8 facilities) damages
Maintenance to increase safety Roles and responsibilities for maintenance are defined,
Priority for Action 3 and protection of investments 9 documented and assigned
in schools
School Heads have allotted budget for routine maintenance of
school facilities for safety and to protect investments, with
10 transparent monitoring oversight at the school level
 School Heads have identified those schools that are expected
11 to be used as temporary evacuation centers for disasters

School Heads are clear with the roles and functions of the
Planning for limited use of school in camp management vis-à-vis the LGU and DSWD as
Priority for Action 4 schools as evacuation centers, per Joint Memorandum Circular No. 1, series of 2013
during the school year "Guidelines on Evacuation Center Coordination and
12 Management" and RA 10821 "Children's Emergency Relief
and Protection Act" and its corresponding IRR

Every new school built is safe

13 Guidance and regulations on the following are followed:
safe school site selection
Priority for Action 2 Guidance and regulations for
safe school construction resilient design, and
resilient construction
New school construction is monitored for compliance with:
14
Monitoring of safe school site
Priority for Action 2 selection, design and safe school site selection
construction safe school design
safe school construction
PILLAR 2: DISASTER RISK MANAGEMENT
Existence of national and sub- School has a Contingency Plan, i.e. Preparedness Plan turned
national plans for preparedness into response actions when a disaster strikes (This could be a
and response, educational 1 separate section/chapter in the DRRM Plan)
continuity, and protection of
education sector investments
School has available, accessible, and adequate first aid kit in
2 every instructional classroom

School has at least 2 necessary and functioning equipment, in

3 case of a disaster (e.g. fire extinguisher, handheld/base radio,
generator, etc.)

4 School has pre-identified spaces for putting up Temporary

Learning spaces/Shelters in the aftermath of a disaster

Priority for Action 4 School has ready resumption strategies and alternative
5 delivery modes to ensure education continuity
School has ensured that students completed the Family
6 Earthquake Prepareness Plan; and school has reported
completion to DepEd DRRM at the Central Office

7 School has established a school personnel tracking

system/protocol in the event of a disaster

8 School has trained personnel to administer first aid to students

and personnel

9 School has psychosocial interventions for personnel and

students

10 School has trained teachers and other personnel who could

provide psychosocial support to students

Annual review of school 11 School DRRM Plan and SIP with DRRM integration are
reviewed annually
disaster risk reduction and
Priority for Action 4 management measures (e.g. as
part of school-based 12 Conducted Brigada Eskwela to ensure school safety and
preparedness measures are in place as per DO
management and/or school
improvement) 13 Students, teachers, parents and other stakeholders
participated in Brigada Eskwela

School has established functional early warning system to

14 inform students and personnel of hazards and emergencies
(protocol, warning signs, devices, IEC), considering national
and LGU warning systems and protocols
Conduct of regular simulation
drill, at all levels, to practice
Priority for Action 4 response preparedness and to School conducted regular hazard-specific drills (at least 3
review response plans (i.e. 15 hazards) with participation of stakeholders (BFP, Medic, LGUs,
Contingency Plan) NGOs, community, PTA, alumni, and others)

16 Number of students who participated in the drills

17 School has an evacuation plan and procedures
18 School has a student-family reunification plan that is clearly
disseminated to students, teachers and parents

19 School Head has received DRRM training from division or

region or partners
Needs assessment, strategy,
and implementation plan to 20 School DRRM Team has received DRRM training from
division or region or partners (indicate how many)
Priority for Action 3 develop staff and student
capacity for participation in 21 School has conducted awareness and capacity building for
families and learners
school based DRRM
22 School
the LGU
participated in the different DRRM/CCA/EiE activities of

PILLAR 3: RISK REDUCTION AND RESILIENCE EDUCATION

1 School has integrated key DRR and CCA concepts in the
curriculum based on the National Curriculum Guide

Integration of common risk

 2 Year when DRR and CCA integration in the curriculum started
Integration of common risk
Priority for Action 3 reduction and resilience Grade levels and subjects where DRR and CCA been
messages in the curriculum 3 integrated

Skills and competencies of students are assessed through

measurable learning and risk reduction (RR) outcomes

Intergration of risk reduction Percentage of students actively participating in various

Priority for Action 3 and resilience in extra- 4 DRRM/CCA/EiE activities
curricular activities

5 School has a DRRM capacity building plan for teachers and

school personnel
Capacity building for and 6 Number personnel trained on DRRM and/or CCA
Priority for Action 3 personnel on risk reduction and School has available and accessible quality and up-to-date
resilience education 7 DRRM materials

8 Presence of DRRM corner, with updated IEC materials posted

in it, in every classroom

Priority for Action 3 Monitoring and Evaluation 9 School carries out monitoring and evaluation to assess
sustainable implementation

Risk Assessment Matrix (Hazard Probability)

Hazard Probability
(HP) Capacity Rating
Hazards Rating
(1=lowest; 5=highest)
(Yes or No)
YES NO
Earthquake*
Cyclone *(Typhoon)
Fire
Flooding
Tornado
Landslide
Drought
Tsunami
Volcanic eruption
Security Threat
(i.e. armed conflict, lock down, etc.)
Health Threat (i.e., COVID-19, Dengue, Malaria)
Other. Please Specify__________________
*The entire country has a high risk from the threat of the hazards of earthquakes and cyclones. Thus, risk reduction
measures are mandatory for all schools for these hazards.

School is identified as Evacuation Center (Yes/No):

Evaluated by: _____________________________________________

School DRRM Coordinator Signature Over Printed Name / Contact No.
Date Signed: _____________________________________________
Contact No. of the School DRRM Coordinator: _____________________________________________

Reviewed and Approved by: _____________________________________________

Name and Signature of School Head: _____________________________________________
Date Signed: _____________________________________________
Contact No of the School Head: _____________________________________________

Received by: DR. MARVIN M. NICER, MCDRM

Project Development Officer II
Division DRRM Coordinator
09154259803