Al Battani s Astrological History of the-1
Al Battani s Astrological History of the-1
Al Battani s Astrological History of the-1
E.S. Kennedy,
Colleagues and Former Students
Abstract
This article presents the last major project that Edward S. Kennedy (1912-
2009) worked on towards the end of his long and productive life. Finished
by three “colleagues and former students”, it gives a full edition with En-
glish translation of the astrological history of the Prophet and the early
caliphate by al-Battānī (ca. 900), which is extant in a unique manuscript in
Ankara. The commentary includes definitions of most relevant astrologi-
cal concepts, analyses and recomputations of the 21 horoscopes given by
al-Battānī, and a detailed discussion of his astrological interpretations.
Introduction
Prof. E.S. Kennedy dedicated the last years of his long and active life to
the study of the text presented here: an edition, translation and commen-
tary of the Kit×b f÷ dal×’il al-qir×n×t wa l-kusýf×t by the famous Syrian
astronomer Mu¬ammad ibn J×bir ibn Sin×n al-©arr×n÷ al-Batt×n÷ (b.
before 858, d. 929)1. This text is extant in a thirteenth-century manuscript
1
Hartner; van Dalen 2.
2
Sezgin, p. 159, no. 1.
3
Sezgin, p. 147, no. 18.
4
Sezgin, p. 95, no. 1.
5
See Pingree 1, pp. 487 ff; Pingree 2, pp. 70 ff. Most relevant technical concepts are
explained in detail in the commentary starting on page 76.
6
MS Leiden 107, f. 70v.
7
Batt×n÷, vol. 1, p. XXIII; Hartner, p. 513; Hilty, p. 195.
Al-Battānī’s Astrological History—Introduction 15
George Saliba edited the Arabic text; Benno van Dalen prepared the soft-
ware for recomputing the horoscopes, wrote part of the astronomical com-
mentary, and added three appendices on the recomputation and astronom-
ical analysis of the horoscopes. Finally, as Kennedy had only written an
astrological commentary of the introductory section of the book, Julio
Samsó tried to clarify al-Batt×n÷’s interpretations of each of the 21 horo-
scopes in the work. George Saliba also prepared a working edition8 of the
Kit×b jaw×miþ a¬k×m al-kusýfayn wa qir×n al-kawkabayn Zu¬al wa l-
Mushtar÷ wa-dal×lat dhalika þal× amr al-milal wa l-ady×n wa l-mulýk wa
a¬w×l al-þ×lam by al-Batt×n÷’s contemporary Abý l-Q×sim [þAbd All×h]
ibn [A]m×jýr, which contains a summary of al-Battānī’s astrological the-
ory as developed in Dal×’il al-qir×n×t wa l-kusýf×t. Because a full investi-
gation of Ibn Amājūr’s treatise would have significantly delayed publica-
tion of this study, we have decided not to include it here. George Saliba is
planning to publish the text together with a translation and a commentary.
Also a systematic comparison of Battānī’s astrological history (and in par-
ticular the dated events it includes) with other early Islamic works on uni-
versal astrology is left for future research.
Van Dalen, Saliba and Samsó are the “colleagues and former students”
who co-author this paper. They all consider themselves to be Ted Ken-
nedy’s disciples – even though not all of them were technically his stu-
dents – and wish to dedicate this paper to the memory of their master.
As a result of the long period of time that elapsed between the beginning
of Ted Kennedy’s work on Battānī’s astrological history and this publica-
tion, we did not any more have an editable version of George Saliba’s
edition of the Arabic text. Rather than typesetting the entire text anew, we
decided to reproduce the original edition, which is generally in very good
state. There is, however, a small number of places in the horoscope data
where we decided to deviate from the edition. All these deviations have
been indicated in the notes to the horoscopes in the commentary, where
they are indicated by asterisks following the data.
8
Based on MS Leiden, Universiteitsbibliotheek, Or. 107, fols. 70v-76r (de Jong et De
Goeje, pp. 115-116). Another MS of the same work is also extant: Paris, Bibliothèque
Nationale de France, arabe 5894, fols. 67v-73r (Blochet, p. 135). See Rosenfeld & Ih-
sano§lu, p. 70, no 157.
00 Al-Battānı̄’s Astrological History—Edition and Translation 17
f.27v
f.28r
Then the conjunction returns into the fifth sign from the sign in which it
had conjoined the first time, then unto the ninth sign from it after a thousand
and nine hundred and sixty-six solar (years), so that its return will be to the
first sign after two thousand and eight hundred years and fifty-nine years.
That will be after a hundred and forty-four conjunctions. So if one multiplies
each one of these two numbers by the twelve signs, that which remains from
5 the number of conjunctions (will be) | a thousand and seven hundred and
twenty-eight conjunctions, and from the number of years (will be) close to
thirty-four thousand and three hundred years. This resembles the number I
mentioned as being the amount of one cycle of the stellar cycles.
The planet Mars has, together with the other two (superior) planets, a
strong witness and participation on account of its position above the sun.
Thus, because it is larger in body than the two remaining planets under it, I
mean Venus and Mercury, their strength in that regard is less than the
strength of Mars; then whenever Saturn and Jupiter conjoin in a triplicity,
10 their power will become apparent, and the people of the countries, | regions,
and nations related to them (the planets) will become mighty, and will
conquer those who are in their vicinity, especially those countries related to
the sign in which the conjunction and the eclipse occur together. They are
affected by damage and calamities when Saturn and Mars frequent their sign,
or the sign opposite it, or in quartile with it. That will be according to the
ordering of power and weakness. Thus they acquire goodness and good
fortune in (all) affairs when Jupiter and Venus frequent in these cardines,
especially Jupiter, because of its longer stay in that position.
15 The statement regarding what we said before may be | divided into three
parts. The first is the affairs of religious sects, it being the highest of them in
rank, the longest in duration, and the heaviest of them in weight. The second
concerns the affairs of government, for which there are transitions in the
houses (dynasties) within the same religious sect, it being the middle of the
three as to strength and weight. The third part is the affairs of kings, it being
lower than the first two parts as to strength and duration, and the most
variable of them.
22 00
Al-Battānī’s Astrological History—Edition and Translation 23
f.28v
It is possible that the religious sect may be within the government, and the
government within the religious sect. Either of them may be weakened or
strengthened from time to time. As for governments without religious sects,
they are quick to decline. Similarly, religious sects which are without govern-
ment, they decay and fade away quickly.
Saturn, Jupiter, and Mars exceed the other planets1 in virtue if they are
positioned at the eclipse, and if the indications are inferred from them by
5 virtue of their dominance over | the administration. Their dominance over the
administration will be according to what they have by virtue of apportion-
ment in these places: be they lords of (1) the zodiac, (2) in exaltation, (3) the
triplicities, (4) the terms, and (5) imminent appearances, or participation in
the configuration. I mean in the sign of the eclipse, and the sign of the cardine
passed by one of the two luminaries before its eclipse. If these five appor-
tionments are gathered into one planet by itself, it alone would be the lord of
the administration. If they (the apportionments) are allotted to two or more,
10 one takes together the two planets which have | more relations to each of the
two places – or [any of] the other planets having the apportionments – then if
the share of each of them is equal to the other in weight, then the one which
could be described as being at the cardine would be selected and given
prominence in the administration. The administrator of the sign in which the
eclipse takes place would be selected first and given prominence.
One takes also fixed stars which rise or culminate together with the place
of the eclipse, whichever of these two cardines is reached by either of the two
15 luminaries at the time of the eclipse2, | and furthermore the stars located in
that cardine at the time of the eclipse. Then the indications concerning the
particulars of things are to be taken from the characteristics of the signs in
which the eclipse occurs, as well as those (signs) in which the wandering
stars in charge of the administration are found. From the depiction of these
two places and the configuration of the fixed stars
1
Here a marginal note, in bad Arabic, characterizes this section as dealing with the
administration of eclipses.
2
A note added to the text in a different hand marks this section as “The fixed star which is
the administrator of eclipses”.
24 00
Al-Battānī’s Astrological History—Edition and Translation 25
f.29r
f.29v
related to morning in the case of solar eclipses, which indicate the multi-
plicity of the event, and that it will include most of the varieties. If it is in
diametrical opposition to the sun, the event will be of the medium (variety),
and will affect half the varieties. But if it is in a configuration related to
morning at lunar eclipses, or in configurations related to evenings at solar
5 eclipses, the event will be | small, (affecting) few varieties. The speed or
slowness at which an event (takes place) is also indicated by those stars. That
is when they are (involved) in both situations, I mean both solar and lunar
eclipses are related to morning, the event will be quick, but when related to
evenings it will be slow. Similarly, if it is in an eastern region of the horizon
it indicates speed, but if it is in the vicinity of midheaven, it indicates me-
10 dium speed or slowness, | but if it is in a western region it indicates slowness
and delay. When the eclipse is apparent to the senses, ascending toward
midheaven, the event will be strong, and continuously increasing. But if it is
descending toward the horizon, going to the west and disappearing from the
senses, it will be less than that.
As for Venus and Mercury, if they are related to evening risings (?), they
indicate speed, but their risings related to morning indicate a lesser degree of
15 that. Their settings related to both mornings and | evenings indicate slow-
ness, and most of their indications (point to) multiplicity and paucity of
events.
As for the indication which is peculiar to each one of the planets, it is
special to it. If Saturn alone has assumed the administration, it would be a
cause of fear, distress, flight, and death, especially for anyone advanced in
years.
28 00
Al-Battānī’s Astrological History—Edition and Translation 29
f.30r
f.30v
and other (phenomena) of this nature which are called [canes], horns, and
suchlike. Their natures will replace the previous ones (celestial bodies).
Indeed, the nature of both Mars and Mercury bring about in them things
related to wars, conflagrations and earthquakes. The localities in which
events occur are indicated by their (comets, etc.) positions in the ecliptic, or
by positions indicated by the star’s tail. The kind of event occurring will be
indicated by the figure which appears. The duration (of the comet indicates)
5 the duration of | the events. From its relation to time the nature of the event
(is indicated). For in most cases, if their appearance is in the evening, the
event from it will be slow. But if it appears in the morning, the event will be
speedy. The indication for the strength or weakness of the event is from the
positions of the eclipses and the conjunctions in those signs, especially if
they are at the beginning of a shift to (another) triplicity, the strength will be
greatest. Next (in strength) will occur, as we have said, at the time of return
of the conjunction to the sign in which it began in the triplicity. Next, if it is |
10 in (one of) the two remaining signs of the triplicity, it will be the weakest of
the three in strength. This (order of strength) is because a conjunction and an
eclipse will not occur in the same position in the ecliptic at the beginning of
the shift of the conjunction to a triplicity except after an immoderate (amount
of) time.
Indeed, it was said that the times of changes take place every three hun-
dred and forty years, or thereabouts; that is that there will not occur any
conjunction with an eclipse, or in opposition to it in the ecliptic, as we have
found by examination, except in the case of the fifth conjunction from the
first. It occurred at the diametrically (opposite point) to the eclipse, and that
15 after eighty years, approximately. | Then, after the transfer of the conjunction
to another triplicity, it will be the eighteenth conjunction from the first. That
will be after three hundred and thirty-seven years. For there also an eclipse
occurred at the end of the conjunction. Then that which is after it by two
conjunctions, it being the twentieth conjunction from the first. That will be
after three hundred and seventy-seven years.
32 00
Al-Battānī’s Astrological History—Edition and Translation 33
f.31r
The Advent of the Prophet, the Prayers of God upon Him and Peace
5 | The appearance of his prophetic mission, the prayers of God upon him, was
forty years after the first conjunction, which was at the time of his birth.
There was also the twelfth conjunction after the first, which was after two
hundred and thirty-eight years, in opposition to the eclipse. Except that the
sun was in the last degree of the sign, while Saturn and Jupiter were in more
than half of the sign, and the moon in opposition to the sun. It was the
weakest of what we have found during this time in which we measured all
the conjunctions1 we have stated. At the time of the eclipse the conjunction
may depart from the triplicity in which it had been, before the completion of
10 twelve conjunctions. | It may also return to it at the thirteenth conjunction,
that being the conjunction at which the shift (normally) occurs. This is the
principle2 which indicates matters of change. From such (principles) are the
indications of state and kings, except that in the case of affairs of state the
conjunction need not coincide with the eclipse or be diametrically opposite
to it in the ecliptic. Similarly, in the affairs of kings, the eclipses need not be
at the times of the conjunctions, nor in their position in the ecliptic, but
rather one looks into affairs of state which involve dynasties, from the po-
15 sitions of the planets | which are the causes of the events, at the principal
points, at the beginning, which indicate the changes at the times of eclipses
occurring at the time of the return of the conjunctions to their places in the
ecliptic. That is a thing which will occur once each sixty3 years approximate-
ly. The beginning of the (new) government may precede it (the conjunction),
and
1
We read the plural as suggested in the margin.
2
We read “principle” in accordance with the marginal note designating the variant reading
from another manuscript.
3
A marginal note in a late hand asserts that a conjunction of the two superior planets took
place in 1114 H in the sign of Aries, and that there was another one in 1175 H, also in Aries,
hence separated by sixty years.
34 00
Al-Battānī’s Astrological History—Edition and Translation 35
f.31v
thus it may occur at the conjunction which took place before the conjunction
of the return (to the old triplicity) near to its expiration. Then the government
attains maturity and reaches a steady state during the conjunction of the
return, in accordance with the situation of the planets with respect to each
other during these (above-)mentioned times, and their configuration with
respect to their original condition. The good fortune and adversity (which
may befall) it is in accordance with what will be mentioned later. With
regard to signs, marking the culminations of the years – starting from the
first sign in which the beginning (of the government) occurred – giving to
5 each sign a | year, as is done with nativities. The consideration of the affairs
of kings is (derived) from the other eclipses which occur before the times of
their reign, as was previously stated, and as will also be mentioned in
connection with the causes for the rise and fall of kings. Together with that,
one considers year transfers which are at the birth of the chief of a religious
community, and the terminus (intih×’) signs of their horoscopes in these
years, and from eclipses of the conjunctions in between which the accession
of kings takes place. Some of these matters are weighted analogously to
other (things). Now that we have mentioned the substance of what ought to
be stated for this sort (of thing), we draw up an example of it, and set up a
10 measure as a standard (for other things) to be measured analogously. | We
commence with the conjunction which indicates the advent of the rule of the
Arabs, and the birth of the Prophet, the prayers of God upon him and peace.
We disregard everything which preceded it, since (our) concern is with
nations and religious sects of the (recent) past.
f.32r
1
Repeated in another hand under the line.
38 00
Al-Battānī’s Astrological History—Edition and Translation 39
f.32v
(their other) neighbors, and the flourishing of their state. Mars was ruling
over the affair of the eclipse and its position and the conjunction in all
respects, thus well deserving of the administration, for it is the lord of the
house and term and triplicity. Moreover, it participates with the position of
the eclipse in the configuration of trine, and it so happened that it was in the
summer solstitial sign in the direction of the western horizon, and westerly
5 with respect to the sun in the configuration pertaining | to the evenings.
There occur with it the fixed stars which are similar to it in temperament and
power, thus indicating a change of religion and the appearance of a faith, and
the delay in its occurrence. The age of its propagator being that of the
elderly, advanced in years, and (indicating) the multiplying of the commu-
nity, and the entry of people into (this) religion, and the propagation of (this)
religion to the farthest parts of the earth, and its overwhelming of other
religions. It also indicates wars and succor and contention which will be
between the Prophet, the prayers of God upon him and peace, and his clan,
and what he encountered from them and from the other Arabs until he was in
10 full control, and all the Arabs succumbed to him close to his death, | the
prayers of God upon him.
Because the eclipse was at the complete (shift), it indicated the length of
time of (this) religion, and its persistence as long as the earth exists. Because
the eclipse was ascending from the east toward midheaven, being seen and
observed in most of the inhabited regions, it indicates the power of the
religious community (of Islam) and its increase during the passage of ages
and (long) times, and the spread of the faith. Because of the configuration of
Mars with Scorpio of the Arabs, since their country is related to it (Scorpio),
it being the administrator of the eclipse, it indicates valor, chivalry, courage,
fighting, perseverance, and self sacrifice in war, success and victory. Since
15 the moon, after the eclipse, was in aspect (itti½×l) | with Venus – while it
(Venus), being strong, emerging from under the rays in an evening
appearance, also being the lord of the solar house as well as its (solar) term,
its triplicity, being (that of) Scorpio, in which the conjunction and the eclipse
take place, (sharing) with Mars and the moon, (these) indicate revelation,
prophecy, divine matters, cleanliness, purity, nobility of morals, and love of
women and perfume.
40 00
Al-Battānī’s Astrological History—Edition and Translation 41
f.33r
Especially since it (Venus) has sovereignty over the country, together with
Scorpio, and the day related to it is Friday. Because Jupiter rules over the
cardine which preceded the position of the eclipse, I mean the ascendant, and
was conjoint with the eclipse, and (because of) its moderate temperament
whenever it conjoins with Saturn – both indicating good fortune, it indicates
reverence, piety, trustworthiness, honor, substance, good lineage, generosity,
5 and the pursuit of the highest and most magnificent things. Because | the
planets are in the northern direction, and Saturn, the highest of them, is
related to Mecca in particular, together with Libra, it indicates honor for the
people of Mecca especially, and their excellence and dignity over the rest of
the Arabs and the other nations.
If it were said that since Mars was in its cadence there would be war with
alternate success, and (also) since the indication pertains to the moon
because of its eclipse – it being lord of the triplicity at night while in its
10 cadence – (this) indicates the small years for kings, being to the amount of
twenty-five years. Moreover, if it is (also) said since Mercury was a witness,
and | did not participate in the indications, the propagator of the religion, I
mean the Prophet, the prayers of God upon him, was illiterate, writing
nothing. If it is also said that Mars, to which is given the administration of
the eclipse, was in the ninth sign (counting) from the sign of the eclipse,
which is called the house of religion, indicating the appearance of the
religion and faith, it would not be denied. Since Mars is also nocturnal, and
was in its domain above the earth at night, it indicates victory, success, and
15 happy culmination, together with many other indications for anyone who can
discern them and consider it in such manner that its description | and
explanation takes a long time.
The Birth of the Prophet, the Prayers of God Upon Him and Peace,
was before the eclipse by six days in the night of which the morning was
Monday, it being the twentieth night of N÷s×n of year eight hundred and
eighty-two1 of the years of the Two-Horned. But the time (of day) is not
found, except that which has been transmitted to us by
1
The number is repeated under the word, in Indian (decimal) numerals.
42 00
Al-Battānī’s Astrological History—Edition and Translation 43
f.33v
reciters of tradition, and attested by reports that he was born in the night. The
(situation matching) the conditions of his birth, as well as the gifts which
God, be He exalted, bestowed upon him, that is his prophetic mission, and
the declaration of his call – when that is critically examined with respect to
his age – the time of the birth must have been during this night. Saturn and
Jupiter were in conjunction in the same minute (of arc) in the line of
midheaven. That is that if the part (of the ecliptic) at which the conjunction
5 occurred, it being 3 of Scorpio, were at the midheaven of Mecca, then | the
ascendant would be Capricorn 20 degrees, the sun in Taurus 5;25, the moon
in Leo 2, Venus in Taurus 11;30, Mercury in Aries 7, the Lot of Fortune in
Taurus 8, Saturn and Jupiter in Scorpio 3. So the lord of the ascendant is
Saturn, it being the lord of the triplicity of the conjunction which was before
the nativity, with Jupiter in the degree of midheaven. Venus was in aspect
with the ascendant, it being the
10 lord of its triplicity1. | So, if the
degree of the ascendant is taken
as the indication of age, and the
tasy÷r is computed up to quartile
with Mars, there would be between
the two, in the (oblique) ascensions
for Mecca, 61 degrees. And if the
degree of the conjunction, which is
the degree of midheaven, is made
the indicator, there would be be-
tween it and opposition to Mars,
15 61 degrees in right ascension. If |
the degrees of the moon are taken
to be the indicator, since it is the
lord of the region in the western cardine, then between it and the degree of
Saturn, as well as the trine of Mars in the westerly region of the horizon, (is)
61 degrees as well. Thus is the amount of his life, upon him peace, in solar
years. If the degree of the ascendant were changed from its position and
situation, these numbers would not coincide,
1
A marginal gloss in Persian says: The age of the Prophet, the prayers of God upon him
and peace, (as a Prophet) was 41 (to) 61 (years).
44 00
Al-Battānī’s Astrological History—Edition and Translation 45
f.34r
one with the other, and not one of them will agree with the like of this
number.
So There Happened
the Third Conjunction,
f.34v
conjunction in Aquarius 22, Mars in Aries 11, Venus in Taurus 10, Mercury
in Aries 17. The sign of the terminus (intih×’) was Aquarius, the conjunc-
tions going out of the triplicity of Scorpio into the Libra triplicity, the year
(transfer) being the sign of Aquarius, whose lord is Saturn, it being in its
house, conjunct with Jupiter, and in one of the cardines of the [first] con-
junction, and it is the lord of the triplicity, sharing it with Mercury.
5 Mercury is the ruler over the place of the eclipse at the house | and the
exaltation, and it is in an equinoctial sign. Mars, which is the indicator of the
eclipse at the original position (a½l), is (now) in conjunction with it in the
(same) sign. Venus, in its original position, is the lord of the triplicity of the
sun (as well as) its (the sun’s) exaltation, because it is the indicator for being
above the earth, so that indicates a change in the affairs of temples in this
conjunction, and in revelation and prophecy on account of the administration
of Mercury and Venus as well as (the position of) Mars, because it is the lord
of the original, and lord of the sun’s triplicity (together) with Venus, it
(Mars) being in its (designated) place, as was mentioned.
So the assumption of his mission by the Prophet, the prayers of God upon
10 him and peace, and the declaration of his call was at | the beginning of this
conjunction, that being after forty years of his life had (passed). The affairs
of the Arabs were set in motion during these two conjunctions, and they
extracted their due from the foreigners in war. Word about the mission of the
Prophet, the prayers of God upon him and peace, were widely spread in the
region of Tih×ma, and people were agitated about it, and it became so widely
known that a group of Arabs began to claim prophecy, aspiring toward it by
virtue of what was about to happen at this time. So when the Prophet, the
prayers of God upon him and peace, prophesied, he remained among them in
Mecca for a period of about ten years, calling them unto God, be He exalted,
15 while they in return maltreated him, and called him a liar and he encountered
| from them adversity, so much so that he emigrated from Mecca to Medina.
His arrival in the vicinity of Medina was on a Monday, eight days having
passed of the month of Rab÷þ I, of the first year of the Hijra, it being the
twentieth day of Aylýl, year 933, which began with Aylýl. So it was his
arrival at Qub×’ (near Medina), according to the reports transmitted to us, at
the time when
48 00
Al-Battānī’s Astrological History—Edition and Translation 49
f.35r
the forenoon had advanced so that the sun had almost culminated, necessita-
ting that the ascendant at that time be in Sagittarius, which was the ascendant
of the original eclipse. The sun on that day was in Virgo 29, the moon in
Aquarius 2, Saturn in Leo 9, Jupiter in Pisces 7, Mars and Venus with each
other conjunct in Scorpio 5, the position of the original conjunction and its
eclipse. The two of them were lords of the administration, and together with
5 Scorpio, were associated with the country. | Mercury was in Virgo at the
position of the lunar eclipse of the third conjunction. It is the lord of the sign
of the eclipse. It is said that he passed that night at Qub×’, and entered
Medina the next morning. So all of these circumstances and configurations
bear witness to the original matter, strengthening it and indicating its perfec-
tion which God, be He exalted, has willed in order to honor His Prophet, and
the appearance of his call (daþwa).
The Ascendant of This Year at Its Transfer From the Nativity Was
Taurus, midheaven Aquarius, the sun in Taurus 5;25, the moon in Gemini
13;30, Saturn in Cancer 22;20,
50 00
Al-Battānī’s Astrological History—Edition and Translation 51
f.35v
f.36r
at the eclipse of his death, and Mars was in opposition to it. If one looks into
this year-transfer, the lord of the terminus (taken) from the nativity ascendant
would be Jupiter. It was east of the sun, strong in its vespertine rising,
indicating a praiseworthy situation. Except that Saturn was in opposition to
the nativity ascendant, and the terminus sign (taken) from midheaven,
indicate what he encountered during this year by way of distress, hardship,
5 and exile from the homeland, especially since Cancer is the dejection of |
Saturn, it being the lord of the original ascendant.
Then
Then Occurred the Fourth Conjunction, Being the
Conjunction of the Return to the First Sign, in Year 941
The closest eclipse to it was the lunar eclipse before the conjunction on the
twenty-eighth day of ¶b. Its ascendant (was) Capricorn 21;10, midheaven
10 Scorpio 3;5. The eclipse was in the daytime, and the two maleficent ones at |
the two cardines. The sun was in Virgo 6;37, the moon in Pisces 6;37, Saturn
in Scorpio 3;30, Jupiter in Libra
26;30, Mars in Aquarius 13;30,
Mercury in Leo 27. The terminus
sign was in Libra. After the con-
junction there was a nocturnal
solar eclipse, and the sun at the
end of the eclipse was in the house
of the ascendant. The sun and the
15 moon were in Aquarius 27;27, |
Saturn in Scorpio 20, Jupiter in
Scorpio 29;30, Mars in Taurus 11,
Venus in Aquarius 15, Mercury in
Pisces
54 00
Al-Battānī’s Astrological History—Edition and Translation 55
f.36v
9;30. The eclipse was in the night of the twenty-second of Shub×[Ð] of the
year 942. The terminus sign was Libra. The transfer of the year in which the
eclipse took place was year 60. The ascendant: Aries 10, midheaven
Capricorn 6, the sun in Taurus 0;20, the moon in Taurus 8;30, Saturn
5 retrograde in Scorpio 4, Jupiter | retrograde in Libra 23;40, Mars in Libra
24;40, Venus in Aries 27;20, Mer-
cury in Aries 7;20. The terminus
(taken) from the ascendant of the
nativity (was) Sagittarius, but from
midheaven Libra. The lord of the
terminus (sign taken) from the
ascendant (was) Jupiter, it being
10 together with Mars in the sign of |
the terminus (taken) from the
midheaven of the nativity. Venus
and Mercury were in opposition to
(that) sign, and Venus is the lord
of the year (taken) from mid-
heaven. It passed opposite Mars
entering combust state. The positions of the planets in this transfer indicate a
praiseworthy condition or the contrary, especially regarding the indication of
Venus, which is the lord of the terminus (taken) from the original mid-
heaven, and since Saturn had already returned unto its original position and
was in a beneficent situation in its original position, I mean at the nativity,
indicating a renewal of beneficial affairs and a happy culmination.
f.37r
and the ultimate fate, indicating harm to the (Prophet’s) family, the departure
of the (control of) affairs from their hands unto others of the Quraysh,
especially since the conjunction is the conjunction of return. That is the
indicator of government. The isolation of Saturn in the sign of Scorpio
without Jupiter, and the position of Mars in the ascendant of the eclipse
indicates that there will be wars between them, and confusion in the original
(base of religion), they being the wars of the defectors. Except that because
5 the position of Venus and Jupiter in the sign of | the terminus, Venus being
the lord of the sign, and being strong in the origin (a½l), that indicates a good
state of affairs and the strength of its authority, and the recuperation of the
affairs of the Arabs after that, and their overwhelming of the foreigners and
the conquest of their lands.
Similarly the second, solar eclipse, because it was in the sign of ultimate
fate of the original in the house of the ascendant toward the end of the
eclipse, and the position of Mars in the lunar eclipse – it being also the
position of the eclipse of the accession. Mars was (also) in opposition to the
sign of the original, it being Scorpio with Saturn in it and Jupiter towards its
10 end, distant from Saturn, almost | exiting from it (the sign), Saturn being the
lord of the eclipse, that is the sign of the position of the eclipse, hence the
indication of the two maleficent planets at this eclipse is more certain than
the first. Except that because Venus was the lord of the terminus in Aquarius,
east of the position of the eclipse, retrograde in quartile with Mars, thus
indicating the amelioration of affairs after their having been spoiled.
Because Mars was in Taurus, to which the land of F×rs is related (to-
gether) with Venus, it (Mars) being the spoiler of Taurus and Venus, by
15 virtue of being in quartile with Venus, thus indicating the | destruction of the
kingdom of F×rs, and excessive killing among them during this conjunction.
Because Scorpio is the sign of the Arabs and of the lands of Sh×m as well,
this indicates wars between the Arabs. Since Mars is in such a configuration
with them with Scorpio, it indicates the amelioration of their (the Arabs)
condition and much killing in (the lands of) Sh×m, its extraction from the
grasp of the Byzantines, the victory of the Arabs, and
58 00
Al-Battānī’s Astrological History—Edition and Translation 59
f.37v
the stabilization of their affairs. The total (time of) residence of the Prophet,
the prayers of God upon him and peace, in Medina, from when he emigrated
there until he died, was nine lunar years, eleven months, and twenty-two
days. He, upon him peace, died on a Monday in the morning of the twenty-
fifth of Ayy×r of the year 943. On this day the sun was in Gemini 5;25, the
5 moon in Gemini 11, Saturn in Scorpio 27, Jupiter in Capricorn 1;30, | Mars
in Pisces 15;30, Venus in Cancer 15;40, Mercury in Cancer 1.
The transfer of this year was the sixty-second year from the nativity; the
ascendant (was) Libra 4, midheaven Cancer 4, the sun in Taurus 5;25, the
moon in Aquarius 15;20, Saturn in Scorpio 29;20, Jupiter in Capricorn 3;20,
Mars in Aquarius 18;40, Venus in Gemini 3;10, Mercury in Aries 27. The
terminus sign of the ascendant of the transfer (was) Aquarius, and in it the
moon with Mars, it being in opposition to the position of the moon at the
10 birth, thus the | corruption of the moon and the corruption of the terminus
degree, together with the indication of the origin, (these) indicate his death
during the year. Since Mars came to be in Pisces, it being the sign of the
second month from the transfer, he
died in it on its eighth day, the
sign of which was Gemini, having
in it the sun, with the moon just
becoming visible in quartile with
Mars, the lord of the sign being
15 Mercury, | in the position of Mars
at the nativity, hence he died on
this day, while the ascendant (was
in) Leo, the eighth house in the
horoscope of the nativity, with the
position of the moon in it at the
original (time), together with nu-
merous other indications which we
omit to mention in order to avoid
excessive detail. What we have mentioned thus far is sufficient.
60 00
Al-Battānī’s Astrological History—Edition and Translation 61
f.38r
If it were said that the duration from the time of the assumption of his
mission, which was when he was forty years old, and the oath of allegiance
sworn to him at that time, until the time of his death will be twenty-one solar
years, it being the maximum (duration) of their rule approximately, and that
was also in accordance with the lives of kings.
f.38v
f.39r
f.39v
a killing in public. Because the cardine which the sun passed was the ascen-
dant, and its lord is the sun, Mars and Mercury are with it (the Sun) in the
sign, that indicated variable affairs, their beginnings being better than their
ends, elevation (in rank), and leadership, because the sun was at its greatest
distance from the earth. Therefore the caliphate of þUthm×n was eleven
5 years, eleven months and nineteen days. His murder was on the twenty-
seventh of ©az÷r×n of the year | 967, that being the year at which the termi-
nus ended, (starting) from Gemini, which was the position of the sun during
the day, because the eclipse was in the daytime of that day and was at one of
the original cardines, the position of the sun being in it, in opposition to
Saturn in the eclipse of the return, which was the eclipse of the fourth con-
junction.
f.40r
and Saturn and Jupiter conjunct with the sun, beginning to move eastward
from it. The lord of the eclipse was Saturn; the lord of the term and the
exaltation was Mars; Saturn was in the solsticial sign, and Mars was about to
reach the equinoctial sign. The eclipse was in the ascendant, continually
clearing and rising toward its (the ascendant’s sign’s) end. Mars, which is
more dominant, is to the west of the sun, hence that indicates the speed of
5 change in the first event, and the occurrence of | uprisings and wars, espe-
cially since Mars is at midheaven at the beginning of the eclipse. In this year
the people opposed þUthm×n and (unjustly) maligned him.
Since Saturn was to the east and Mars to the west, the time was both fast
and slow, as we have mentioned, except that it was more inclined to speed.
Hence the rebellion commenced after his murder, in the seventh year of the
conjunction, that being the year in which the eclipse sign, which was
Capricorn, ended at the conjunction position, while the conjunction position
(ended) at the eclipse sign. After þUthm×n, matters left the pale of law, and
10 the | caliphate became a kingship after þAl÷ b. Ab÷ Æ×lib, upon him peace.
Matters resulted in accordance with the change indicated by the eclipse. But
because it was not a conjunction of return, it did not spoil the cardines of the
first conjunction, but rather it spoiled the cardine of this conjunction only by
the presence of Mars at the beginning of Libra, and its being easterly from it
(the cardine), the kingship was then confirmed in the line of Umayya. It did
not depart from them unto the caliphate of þAl÷ b. Ab÷ Æ×lib, upon him peace.
f.40v
Virgo 23, Jupiter in Sagittarius 10, Mars in Leo 19;20, Venus in Libra 6;20,
Mercury in Scorpio 6;20.
The terminus sign is Scorpio, it being the original sign. Mercury happens
to be at the position of the original eclipse and of its conjunction, Mars,
which is the lord of Scorpio, is in the midheaven of Scorpio. The position of
the moon is in Aquarius and the terminus from the ascendant of the nativity
5 reaches the sign of the eclipse | at the end of the fifth conjunction. Mercury is
in the fortunes of Mars and in quartile with Mars, and it is in the condition
remarked above. That indicates the
killing of þUthm×n, because Saturn
is in the twelfth (house) from the
sun, not in any relationship to it.
Its configuration with it is a bad
configuration, but the sun is at
10 the end of its | sign of dejection
(hubýÐ) approaching the sign of
the original eclipse and its con-
junction. Venus rises before it (the
sun), and Jupiter is in sextile with
it (the sun) in the signs, thus
giving the amount of its small
years.
Had it not been arranged as we
have stated, it would not have given this amount on account of the bad
configuration with Saturn and its position with respect to its dejection
(hubýÐ). Therefore the caliphate of þAl÷ is four years and nine months. And
because Mars is in the ascendant of the eclipse and the degree of its mid-
heaven is the position of Mars in the original (horoscope), and Mars is in the
15 position of the moon at the original nativity, | and is in the midheaven of
Scorpio, it indicates rebellion, wars, and acts of murder during his caliphate,
and that he will die by the sword, as was the case at the death of þUmar.
Because Venus was in the ascendant of the eclipse, it (the ascendant) being
its (Venus’) house, in aspect with Jupiter, thus indicating improvement, faith,
and the revival of the first subject, I mean the subject of prophecy. But
72 00
Al-Battānī’s Astrological History—Edition and Translation 73
f.41r
since the cardine which the moon had just crossed before its eclipse was the
midheaven, that being the position of Mars in the original (horoscope), its
lord being the eclipsed moon, with Mars in quartile with the original
(horoscope), (these) indicate upheavals against him and spoiling of his
rulership, and wars and quarrels. The terminus this year in which he died
(calculated) from the sign of the eclipse, approximately the beginning of
5 Taurus, arrives to Virgo, the position of | Saturn in the eclipse of his acces-
sion, and in opposition to it Mars in the eclipse of his death. His death was
on the twenty-fourth of K×nýn II, year 972.
f.41v
Saturn was in the eleventh (house) from the sun, and its configuration with
respect to it (the sun) is a good configuration. Jupiter is in the ascendant of
the eclipse, the cardine of the earth (in the original horoscope) is in aspect
with Saturn, also in trine with the sun, and Mercury and Venus are with the
sun in the (same) sign, and the two of them rise after it (the sun). Hence it
gave its small years, all of them. Therefore the rule of Muþ×wiya was
5 nineteen lunar years, three months, and twenty-five (days), up to | the thir-
tieth day of N÷s×n, year 972 (sic).
So the lord of the cardine which the sun passed is Saturn, it being in
quartile with the sign (of the cardine), and Mercury is (also) in aspect with
Saturn, which (itself) is in opposition to Jupiter, thus indicating considered
judgment, patience, forbearance, resourcefulness, good judgment, conniving,
swindling, and the like. The terminus this year is from the solar position at
his accession eclipse up to the sign of the (accession) eclipse, it being the
terminus sign (counting) from the nativity ascendant. It so happened that
Saturn was in it (i.e the sign of the intih×’ in the eclipse in which he died, and
10 the sun | also. So was the terminus of the eclipse of the sixth conjunction,
which was at his death, (counted) up to Aries, it being the position of Mars at
the eclipse of his death.
f.42r
f.42v
position of Mars in the original (horoscope). Mars was in quartile with the
sign of the eclipse, and (also) in quartile with the degree of the nativity
ascendant. Saturn was in the sign of the eclipse, and the sun, in opposition to
it, indicates the death of Muþ×wiya. And because the eclipse was in the
solsticial sign, and its lord is also in the solsticial sign, the configuration of
Saturn with respect to the sun is a bad configuration because of the
5 opposition, it (the sun) travelling to the degree of opposition, Mars in |
quartile with the sun’s sign and Saturn, thus giving it the amount of a fifth of
its small years. Had it not been for the position of Venus with the sun, and its
rising after it, and Saturn being in opposition to it, it (the sun) would not
have been able to grant the gifts. So the accession of Yaz÷d b. Muþ×wiya
lasted three years and three months, and he died on the eleventh day of
Tishr÷n II, year 995. The terminus of the eclipse at his accession ended at
Libra, in opposition to Mars in it (the horoscope). And because the lord of
10 the cardine which the moon crossed was Mercury, it (the sign) being also a
solsticial sign | in quartile with Mars, it indicated evil, departure from
religious precepts, and suchlike things pertaining to the conditions of Mars
and Mercury.
The treatise is finished, praise unto God, the One deserving praise.
80 E.S. Kennedy, Colleagues and Former Students
Commentary
27v:3 The treatise begins with the author’s statement that the noblest of
the branches of astrology is the art of drawing inferences concerning religious
and political events and the lives of rulers. Most of the contemporary as-
trologers do so by the use of year transfers, vernal equinoxes of years in
which a conjunction occurs. The horoscope for that time is cast, and its in-
terpretation supplies the requisite predictions. Batt×n÷ states that there is no
justification for the use of year transfers. He prescribes instead that the plane-
tary configurations should be investigated at the time of an eclipse during or
near a conjunction.
In fact, of the twenty-one horoscopes in the treatise, fifteen are of eclipses,
twelve lunar and three solar. So the author is carrying out his own precepts.
This, Batt×n÷ says, was the attitude of Ptolemy (fl. 150), who was pre-
eminent in the art of astrology. He goes on to advocate the use of Ptolemy’s
Tetrabiblos as a reference for particular astrological judgments. This book
was, and remains, the basic text of horoscopic astrology.
Saturn-
Saturn-Jupiter Conjunctions, Triplicities, and their Shifts
27v:12 As these two planets are the slowest of the seven, their successive
conjunctions occur at longer intervals than those of all the others. The little
known branch of astrology developed from these conjunctions is applied
throughout Batt×n÷’s work. It is therefore necessary to develop it in detail.
See Kennedy 1, Pingree, Kennedy & Pingree, Labarta, Labarta & Mestres,
Yamamoto & Burnett.
The twelve zodiacal signs are divided into four sets, triplicities, of three
signs each. They are associated with the four equilateral triangles formed by
joining midpoints of the three signs which constitute each triplicity (see the
figure on the following page, from Kennedy, p. 40)). Note that the three signs
which make up each triplicity are separated from each other by 120º. Each
triplicity is given the name of one of the four Aristotelian elements. Thus the
first, fire, consists of Aries, Leo and Sagittarius; the second, earth, includes
Taurus, Virgo, and Capricorn; the third, air, contains the signs Gemini, Libra,
and Aquarius; the fourth, water, the signs Cancer, Scorpio, and Pisces.
Al-Battānī’s Astrological History—Commentary 81
The text states that there are twelve conjunctions per shift of triplicity
(27v:16). Using the parameters from the Mumta¬an Z÷j or Battānī’s zīj we
find that the shift of triplicity takes place with the eleventh conjunction. But
the theory of Saturn-Jupiter conjunctions was rooted in Indian and Sasanian
astronomy (cf. Pingree). Using the zīj of al-Khwārizmī (see Suter and Neu-
gebauer), which uses Indian parameters, we indeed find that the shift of
triplicity takes place only with the twelfth conjunction. This being the case,
the time between shifts should be about 240 (= 12 × 20) years. As there are
four triplicities, in something like 960 (= 4 × 240) years the conjunctions
should cover all four. The text (at 27v:17) gives a more accurate number for
this period, namely 953 Julian years, which is in agreement with the mean
motions of Saturn and Jupiter in al-Khwārizmī, the Mumta¬an Zīj, as well as
Battānī.
If the series of conjunctions commences at the first point of Aries, then, af-
ter progressing slowly through all four triplicities to the end of Aries in 953
years, the next conjunction will appear at the beginning of Virgo, the fifth
sign from Aries and the second sign of the first triplicity. This is what Batt×n÷
is saying at 28r:1.
Then, after another cycle and a total of 19[0]6 (= 953 × 2) years (in the text
a scribe has erroneously written 1,966 instead of the correct 1,906), the next
conjunction will appear at the beginning of the ninth sign (Sagittarius), the
third sign of the first triplicity. Finally, the third 953 years will bring it back
to its original sign, after a total span of 2,859 (= 953 × 3) years (28r:2). As
stated at 28r:3, this will involve 144 (= 12 × 3 × 4) conjunctions, there being
twelve conjunctions per sign, three triplicities, and four signs per triplicity.
However, this result was obtained after assuming that at the start of the pe-
riod a conjunction was at the first point of a particular sign. But there are
twelve signs, and all should be treated alike. Therefore the one-sign span
should be multiplied by twelve to produce 34,308 (= 2,859 × 12) years,
which the text rounds to 34,300 at 28r:5. (Just how a conjunction is to find
itself at the first point of a particular sign is not explained.) To perform this
through all twelve signs will require 1,728 (= 144 × 12) conjunctions. This,
Batt×n÷ claims, is close to a stellar cycle that he has previously mentioned.
The cycle, however, is not given in this text.
Al-Battānī’s Astrological History—Commentary 83
Astrological Indications
28r:6 Mars is more powerful than the inferior planets, Venus and Mercury.
Whenever Saturn and Jupiter are in conjunction, countries associated with
them will become powerful, and will conquer their neighbours.
28r:15 - 28v:3 This paragraph discusses the relations between religious
sects, governments, and kings. Both sects and governments vary in strength.
In particular, a government without a sect grows weak. Similarly, a sect
without a government grows weak and fades away.
28v:3 Saturn, Jupiter, and Mars are preferred over the other planets if they
are placed in the same sign as an eclipse. Their influence will depend upon
whether they are lords of (1) the zodiac, (2) exaltations1, (3) the triplicities,
(4) the terms2, and (5) their participation in the configuration. The share of
influence of each planet will be determined by these and other considerations.
28v:12 - 29r:6 As for the fixed stars, if they rise or culminate simulta-
neously with the eclipse, the indications are to be inferred from the charac-
teristics of the sign in which the eclipse happens to occur. The magnitudes of
the fixed stars are also to be considered, as well as the signs and tempera-
ments of the participating planets.
29r:8 If a planet is in an equinoctial sign, it indicates what will happen to
the revenues of places of worship. But if it is in a solstitial sign, the indica-
tion is a change in style of worship.
Should the planet be in the ascendant, its indications affect youthful per-
sons. But if in midheaven, it affects the middle-aged. If the planet is wester-
ly, it affects old people.
29r:17 If a constellation related to the evening is in a sign where there is a
lunar eclipse, this indicates a multiplicity of evening events. In like manner,
coincidence of a constellation related to morning events with a solar eclipse
indicates a multiplicity of morning events.
29v:2 If it (the eclipse?) is in opposition to the sun the number of events
will be halved..
1
“Exaltations” (sharaf, pl. ashrāf ) are degrees of the zodiac in which a particular planet
reaches it maximum power and influence. The degrees in which a planet reaches its minimum
power are called “fall” or “cadence” (hubūÐ). See Bīrūnī, p. 258.
2
“Terms” (¬add, pl. ¬udūd) are different unequal divisions of the zodiacal signs associated
with the seven planets. The planet associated with each term is considered to be its lord. See
Bīrūnī, pp. 265-266. Battānī makes use of the Ptolemaic terms (as opposed to the Egyptian or
Indian ones).
84 E.S. Kennedy, Colleagues and Former Students
30r:17 - 30v:6 Comets and related phenomena are named, presumably be-
cause of their rarity. Whenever they appear they take over the indications
usually provided by the maleficent planets Mars and Mercury, their indica-
tions being conflagrations and earthquakes. Returning to comets, the direc-
tion and duration of their indication is determined partially by the direction of
the comet’s tail, and partially by the length of time the comet is visible.
If either of these planets appears in the evening, the event indicated will be
slow; if the appearance is in the morning, the event will be fast.
30v:7 - 31r:3 The indication for the strength of an event is arrived at by
considering the positions of eclipses and conjunctions at the beginning, say,
Al-Battānī’s Astrological History—Commentary 85
of a shift of triplicity. These combinations will only recur after many years.
Hence the event it portends must be of great importance. It is claimed that
changes take place after about 340 years, confirmed by examination (mi¬na).
Two other such periods, of 337 and 377 years, also exist.
The principal tool of the astrologer is the horoscope. The backbone of our
text consists of a sequence of twenty-one horoscopes, dated largely in chro-
nological order. These we have numbered in the order in which they appear
in the text.
But before presenting any of the numbered horoscopes of our text, it is
necessary to give a formal definition of the horoscope, and describe two ways
of displaying it.
A horoscope is a table which lists, for the time the horoscope has been cast:
1. The ascendant, the longitude of the ecliptic point rising across the
eastern horizon.
2. The longitude of midheaven.
3. The longitude of the sun.
4. The longitude of the moon.
5. The longitude of Saturn.
6. The longitude of Jupiter.
7. The longitude of Mars.
8. The longtitude of Venus.
9. The longitude of Mercury.
Occasionally the horoscope will give in addition the longitudes of other ce-
lestial objects, such as the Lunar Node.
In the following we will display each horoscope of Batt×n÷’s treatise as a
table with two or more columns. The first column names the nine celestial
objects shown above. The elements of the second, third, etc. columns are
86 E.S. Kennedy, Colleagues and Former Students
always numbers. They are the longitudes in degrees, of the object named
opposite each one in the first column. The entries in the second column give
the longitudes as reported in the text. Those of the third column have been
obtained by recomputation using the Mumta¬an parameters. The longitudes
in the fourth column are based upon Batt×n÷’s parameters. For the most part,
the longitudes are to one fractional sexagesimal place. For the sake of con-
venience we list all longitudes with their numbers of degrees reckoned from
the vernal equinox (for example, 17º Libra will be reproduced as 197º).
Whenever necessary, we will also mention the form with signs within a zo-
diacal sign which is used throughout the Arabic text and the horoscope
diagrams. All recomputations were carried out by means of a DOS program
Historical Horoscopes designed by Benno van Dalen that makes use of lists
of planetary parameters from actual z÷j es (cf. Appendix A).
Horoscope Diagrams
Battānī usually lists the ascendant, midheaven and the longitudes of the plan-
ets for each horoscope in the text, but for fifteen of the horoscopes in his
treatise he provides horoscope diagrams, an elegant graphical method of dis-
playing most of the information contained in any horoscope. See, for in-
stance, the copy of Batt×n÷’s Horoscope 1 below. The entirety of the diagram
is laid out in the interior of a square. The four sides of the square are trisected
by two points each. Inside the square, two horizontal lines join the two pairs
of trisection points which are opposite each other on the vertical sides of the
square. In like manner, two ver-
tical lines join the two pairs of
trisection points which are oppo-
site each other on the horizontal
sides of the square. These four
lines divide the square into nine
congruent small squares, each
side of which is a third of the
side of the original square.
Of the nine small squares, the
one in the middle of the large
square may serve as a name
plate, to announce, by inscrip-
tions, the number of the partic-
ular horoscope, an astrologically
Al-Battānī’s Astrological History—Commentary 87
31r:5 Mu¬ammad’s mission began 40 years after his birth, which corre-
sponds, approximately, to the year 571 + 40 = 611 (Horoscope 4, dated 15
March 610, corresponds to the beginning of his prophetic mission), which
leaves about ten years for his preaching in Mecca before his migration to
Medina in 622. On the topic of 40 years corresponding to maturity in human
life, see Conrad.
31r:6-10 The text seems to refer to the next Saturn-Jupiter conjunction
with change of triplicity, after the conjunction of Horoscope 1. This took
88 E.S. Kennedy, Colleagues and Former Students
place 238 years after 571, which corresponds to the year 809 AD. Using
Batt×n÷’s parameters the conjunction took place in 241;12º (Sagittarius, sign
of fire) on 19 September, 809 at 22-24 hours after midnight. If we use
Mumta¬an parameters the date is the 22nd September of the same year at 3-7
hours after midnight. This result does not agree with Batt×n÷’s remarks: Sat-
urn and Jupiter should be in more than half of the sign, the conjunction in
opposition to the eclipse (if he is referring to the lunar eclipse of 571 in
214;5º). Another possibility is that al-Batt×n÷ refers to the lunar eclipse on 25
December, 809 (in 8;34º Cancer at 21:16h after midnight) roughly opposite
from the conjunction. At this time, Saturn and Jupiter were already 10º away
from each other, Jupiter in fact being in the last third of Sagittarius, but Sat-
urn in the second third. The Mumta¬an Zīj gives this same eclipse in 8;36º
Cancer at 21:41h. Assuming that Batt×n÷ is referring to the time of the eclipse
and not to the moment of the Saturn-Jupiter conjunction, the moon is obvi-
ously in opposition to the sun (in 8;34º Capricorn), but the sun is not in the
last degree of the sign, as Batt×n÷ states.
Since the eclipse took place after sunset on Saturday, the indication in the
text “the night whose morning was [Sunday] the 26th” is correct. The agree-
ment of the data in this horoscope is not as good as that for most of the other
horoscopes for eclipses. According to the Mumta¬an Z÷j, the eclipse took
place at 20:10 hours with the moon in 216;12º; according to Batt×n÷’s ¼×bi’
Z÷j, at 19:54 hours with the moon in 216;2º. In spite of the small discrepan-
cies, it seems that the lunar position in this horoscope should be corrected to
216;5º. Also the longitude of Mars can be assumed to contain a scribal error.
for a time after sunset). Jupiter is also the lord of the triplicity of fire, in
which we find Sagittarius, and its ¬add (term) begins in 8º Sagittarius.
Mercury is the lord of upper midheaven (house X), in 14º Virgo; this sign
corresponds to its domicile (in daytime) and exaltation (15º Virgo). 13º
Virgo is the beginning of the term of Venus. The sign also corresponds to the
triplicity of earth governed by Venus (in daytime) and the moon (at night).
The sun is in 4;5º Taurus and Taurus is the night domicile of Venus, 8º
Taurus being the end of the term of Venus. The exaltation of the moon is in
3º Taurus. The sign of Taurus, as well as Virgo, corresponds to the triplicity
of earth.
The moon is in 4;5º Scorpio, and this sign is the domicile of Mars during
the day. Scorpio belongs to the triplicity of water governed by Mars in day-
time. The term of Scorpio governed by Mars ends in 6º Scorpio. 2º Scorpio
is the place of the Saturn-Jupiter conjunction.
Both Saturn and Jupiter have northern latitudes and, as they are in 2º Scor-
pio, they are in the term of Mars as well as in its domicile.
Mars is in 14º Cancer (according to the text), and in the 28th degree of this
sign we find the degree of its cadence (hubýÐ). The star at the head of the
Twins is α Geminorum, the longitude of which is 94;30º according to
Batt×n÷’s star table (see Batt×n÷, vol. 2, p. 157). This confirms that the longi-
tude of Mars should be corrected to about 95º. Another possibility is to
imagine that Batt×n÷ refers to β Geminorum (long. 97;50º), which, according
to Ptolemy (I, 9), has the same quality as Mars.
Venus is in 18º Taurus and has a northern latitude. It is in its own domicile
(by night) and it governs the triplicity of earth (Taurus, Virgo, Capricorn) in
daytime.
Mercury is in 14;20º Aries. Its term ends in 21º Aries. Aries belongs to
the triplicity of fire governed by Jupiter at night.
The star which ascends with the moon before the eclipse is Rijl al-Faras
(the horse’s foot, α Centaurii). Its longitude is 199;30º according to Batt×n÷
(vol. 2, p. 174). Ptolemy (I, 9) states that the stars of Centaurus which are in
the horse’s body have the same temperament as Venus and Jupiter.
32r:14-17 The text concludes that eclipse and conjunction, according to
the doctrine of Ptolemy, imply the rise of the Arab state. Both events take
place in the sign of Scorpio, which is called the sign of the Arabs. The asso-
ciation of the sign of Scorpio with Arabia, and especially the ©ij×z, appears
in many sources like B÷rýn÷ (p. 220).
32v:1-12 Mars is said to be the lord of the house (XII, in which both the
conjunction and the eclipse take place), term, triplicity, eclipse, and conjunc-
Al-Battānī’s Astrological History—Commentary 91
tion. Mars is in trine with (i.e., at a distance of 120º from) the position of the
eclipse, indication of a change of religion and its propagation. The text has
Mars at longitude 104º, hence in the sign of Cancer (the same holds for our
corrected value 95º)). For this lunar eclipse the moon is at 214;5º, in the sign
of Scorpio. These two signs are indeed in trine aspect. The difference of
longitudes is almost exactly 120º if we correct the position of Mars to 95º.
A further indication is of the contention between the Prophet and his clan,
and his eventual control of all the Arabs.
The eclipse being at the complete (shift?) indicates the duration of the re-
ligion. The eclipse, ascending from the east towards midheaven, indicates the
power of the religious community and spread of the faith.
32v:12-17 Mars, configured with Scorpio of the Arabs, the administrator
of the eclipse, the indication is valor, chivalry, fighting, success, and victory.
We have already seen that both the eclipse and the conjunction take place in
the domicile of Mars in daytime, in trine aspect with the position of the
planet, and that Mars governs both the triplicity of Scorpio (at night) and its
term.
The moon, after the eclipse, was in aspect with Venus (it will be in opposi-
tion to Venus about one day after the eclipse), strong, in evening appearance,
the lord of the solar house (the sun is in 4;5º Taurus and the moon has its
exaltation in 3º Taurus) and its (solar) term (?). Its triplicity is Scorpio, in
which the conjunction and the eclipse take place. The triplicity of water is
governed by Venus in daytime and by Mars at night, the moon being its asso-
ciate planet, thus indicating prophecy, divine matters, purity, love of women,
and perfume.
33r:1 Here the text implies that Venus, together with Scorpio of the Arabs
(32v:13), has sovereignty over the country. Scorpio begins at 210º and ends
at 240º. In the eclipse the conjunction occurs at 212º, inside Scorpio. A nec-
essary condition for a lunar eclipse is that the sun and the moon be in oppo-
sition. In this eclipse the moon is at 214;5º, also in Scorpio. The presence of
Scorpio in the eclipse and in the conjunction would seem to indicate the sov-
ereignty of the Arabs.
33r:2 Since Jupiter rules over the cardine preceding the position of the
eclipse (in Scorpio), namely the ascendant (in Sagittarius, which is Jupiter’s
daily domicile), and was conjoint with the eclipse, because of its moderate
temperament when with Saturn, both indicating good fortune, the indications
include piety, honor, and the pursuit of the highest.
92 E.S. Kennedy, Colleagues and Former Students
33r:4-5 The planets, being northern, and Saturn, the highest, being related
to Mecca (Arabia in B÷rýn÷, p. 242) with Libra (B÷rýn÷, p. 220), the indication
is honor for the Meccans over the other Arabs and the other nations.
33r:7-15 This passage consists entirely of astrological indications. Mars is
cadent (f÷ hubýÐi-hi) because it is in 5º Cancer and its exaltation (sharaf) is in
28º Capricorn. The same can be said, more precisely, about the moon (4º
Scorpio, its exaltation being in 3º Taurus), in house XI. The period of 25
years corresponds to the short years of the moon (Abý Maþshar, pp. 82-83).
Mercury’s dignities are unimportant in the horoscope, which implies the illit-
eracy of the Prophet. Mars is in Cancer, in house VIII, but Batt×n÷ says that
the sign of Cancer is the ninth sign from the sign of the eclipse (Scorpio), so
he interprets the situation as if Mars were in house IX, the house of religion.
Mars is also a nocturnal planet (B÷rýn÷, p. 234) and it is above the earth at
night. According to B÷rýn÷ (p. 308) these are the conditions that allow us to
consider that Mars is in its ¬alb. In order to consider it to be in its ¬ayyiz we
should add to the previous conditions the fact that Mars, being a masculine
planet (B÷rýn÷, p. 234), should also be in a masculine sign (B÷rýn÷, p. 211),
something which does not seem to be the case because Cancer is a feminine
sign. On ¬alb and ¬ayyiz, see B÷rýn÷, p. 208.
Horoscope 2: 33v:4-7
Birth of the Prophet
Recomputed for Monday, 20 April, 571, 0:09 hours after midnight
planet / cardine text Mumta¬an Batt×n÷
Ascendant 290º 290º 290º
Midheaven [213º] 213º 213º
Sun 030;25º * 030;35º 030;26º
Moon 122º 138;47º 138;50º
Saturn 213º 212;55º 212;55º
Jupiter 213º 213;04º 212;46º
Mars 092º 091;54º 091;49º
Venus 041;30º 040;57º 041;20º
Mercury 007º 006;55º 006;59º
Lot of Fortune 038º *
* The solar longitude is given as 16;13º in the triangle for Taurus (= 46;13º) in the diagram.
In the text it may also be read as as 5;25º Taurus, but since both here and in Horoscopes 7, 10,
and 12 for nativity transfers of the Prophet it is clear that the correct value is 0;25º Taurus, we
prefer this reading. The Lot of Fortune is only given in the text.
A serious error must have occurred in the calculation of the lunar position.
The further agreement of the horoscope data with both recomputations is al-
most perfect. In particular, the ascendant of 290º is in full agreement with
Saturn and Jupiter being in upper midheaven. The solar position, which
should already have been reached four hours earlier according to the Mum-
ta¬an Z÷j, and to a lesser extent the longitude of Venus, suggest that the
horoscope was more likely calculated on the basis of the ¼×bi’ Z÷j.
the elongation of the moon from the sun reckoned from the ascendant: 290º +
(138;50º − 30;26º) − 360º = 38;24º (in daytime the rule gives the Lot of For-
tune as the elongation of the sun from the moon reckoned from the ascen-
dant).
33v:7-9 The analysis of the dignities of the planets in this horoscope is
very brief, for Batt×n÷ is mainly concerned here with the calculation of the
length of life of the Prophet using tasy÷r techniques. He merely says that
Saturn is the lord of the ascendant, arguing that Saturn was the lord of the
triplicity of the luni-solar conjunction (ijtim×þ) which took place before the
birth of the Prophet, Jupiter being in midheaven. Venus is in aspect with the
ascendant (almost a trine, the difference of longitudes being 111;30º) and it is
the lord of its triplicity: the ascendant is in Capricorn, which belongs to the
triplicity of Earth, Venus being its lord in daytime.
33v:10-17 The Prophet’s Life- Life-Span. The text states that to obtain an in-
dication of the subject’s length of life (here the Prophet) by means of the
method of tasyīr (see Schirmer, Viladrich & Martí, Yano & Viladrich, Díaz
Fajardo), take the difference in oblique ascension between the degree of the
ascendant, here 290º, and the quartile of Mars. Here Mars’s longitude is 92º,
hence its quartile is 92º − 90º = 2º. Since the oblique ascension at Mecca of
290º is 300;37º and that of 2º is 1;32º, the difference in the direction of the
zodiac is indeed 360º + 1;32º − 300;37º ≈ 61º.
A second procedure, which gives the same result, is the following. Take
the degree of the conjunction, 213º, which is also the degree of midheaven,
and make it the indicator. Then the difference between this and opposition to
Mars, 272º, this time in right ascension, is again 61º: the right ascension of
213º is 300;46º (measured from Capricorn, see Batt×n÷, vol. 2, pp. 61-64); the
right ascension of 272º is 2;11º; the difference between the two values is
61;25º. Finally, if the longitude of the moon, 152º is taken to be the indica-
tor, then the difference between it and the longitude of Saturn (213º) or the
trine of Mars (212º) is likewise 61º. Here Batt×n÷ uses a simple difference in
longitude between the two indicators and it is clear that the lunar longitude
here assumed is 152º, i.e. 2º Virgo, instead of 2º Leo as in the horoscope.
34r:2-
34r:2-3 The Second Conjunction
below is of this event. The longitudes in the second column were obtained
from the text and from the adjoining horoscope diagram.
Horoscope 3: 34r:3-6
Lunar eclipse near the second Saturn-Jupiter conjunction
Recomputed for Wednesday, 18 October, 590, 21;19 hours after midnight.
planet / cardine text Mumta¬an Batt×n÷
Ascendant 085º 085º 085º
Midheaven 344º 344º 344º
Sun 207;04º * 207;14º 207;8º
Moon 027;04º 027;31º 027;31º
Saturn 097º 097;05º 097;14º
Jupiter 104º 103;51º 103;48º
Mars 232º 231;25º 232;05º
Venus 247;30º 246;14º 246;32º
Mercury 222º 221;35º 222;17º
* The solar longitude is given as 13;7º Libra (=193;7º) in the diagram.
The agreement between text and recomputation is very good for both z÷jes.
The position of Venus may contain a scribal error (7º instead of 6º Sagitta-
rius). There are no astrological indications, probably because Batt×n÷ found
no important event in the life of the Prophet on or near 18 October.
The Intih×’
The intih×’ is an astrological concept used to divide time into equal intervals
like mean Saturn-Jupiter conjunctions. Since this unit apparently originated
in Islamic times, we retain, in this commentary, the Arabic name instead of
translating it into English terminus, as we have done in the translation. The
first appearance of the intih×’ in a horoscope of our text is in Horoscope 4
below. There are four varieties of intih×’×t, but since our text uses only the
small intih×’, we will confine our attention to it. Pingree, p. 60, states that the
small intih×’ moves one zodiacal sign per year. Pingree, p. 79, further states
that, according to al-Sijz÷, the intih×’ was in Sagittarius on 19 March (¶dh×r),
571, which was the day of the vernal equinox of that year. This starting point
for the computation of the intih×’ seems to have been correctly used in Horo-
scope 4, while the further intih×’×t in horoscopes 6, 8, 9, 14, 16, 17, 18, 19
differ consistently by one zodiacal sign from those obtained from al-Sijz÷.
96 E.S. Kennedy, Colleagues and Former Students
There is, furthermore, a certain number of intih×’×t calculated with other zo-
diacal signs as the starting point, such as the sign of the ascendant of the
Prophet’s nativity (Horoscope 2) in Horoscopes 6, 10, 12, 14, 18, 19; the sign
of midheaven of nativity in Horoscopes 6 and 10; the signs of the eclipses of
Horoscope 4 (in Horoscope 6), 6 (in Horoscope 6), 17 (in Horoscope 17), 18
(in Horoscope 18), 20 (in Horoscope 20), 21 (in Horoscope 21) and, finally,
the sign of the sun in Horoscope 19 (in Horoscope 19). It seems clear, there-
fore, that more than one type of intih×’ can be used in a single horoscope,
according to the necessities of the prediction.
It is usually understood that when the intih×’ is involved, the year
commences with the vernal equinox (although this assumption is not always
evident in the intih×’×t which use the different starting signs mentioned
above). Indeed, in the horoscope which accompanies al-Sijzī’s announce-
ment of the intih×’ (Pingree, p. 79) the solar longitude is given as 0;0º,
implying a vernal equinox. Hence 571 may be taken as the year-number.
The date of our Horoscope 4 below is 15 March, 610. This is some four days
before the equinox, hence the number of the preceding year, 609, must be
used for reckoning the integer years elapsed since the vernal equinox given
by al-Sijz÷. This results in 609 - 571 = 38. Since there are twelve zodiacal
signs per year, and since (3 × 12) + 2 = 38, it follows that, having started
from Sagittarius, the intih×’ will rotate three times around the ecliptic and
advance an additional two signs, ending in Aquarius, as in the text.
34r:7-
34r:7-9 The Third Conjunction
During the year the third conjunction occurred, the Prophet first preached,
and there was a daylight lunar eclipse on 15 March, 610. This is Oppolzer
lunar eclipse 2,808, 15 March, 610, at 8:31h after midnight. Horoscope 4
below was cast for this eclipse.
Horoscope
Horoscope 4: 34r:10 - 34v:2
Lunar eclipse near the third Saturn-Jupiter conjunction
Recomputed for Sunday, 15 March, 610, 10:47 hours after midnight
planet / cardine text Mumta¬an Batt×n÷
Ascendant 079º 079º 079º
Midheaven 337º * 337º 337º
Sun 357;30º 356;37º 356;30º
Moon 177;30º 176;36º 176;39º
Al-Battānī’s Astrological History—Commentary 97
Since the solar position at the time of the opposition is 356;37º according
to the Mumta¬an Z÷j and 356;30º according to Batt×n÷’s Z÷j, the text’s
357;30º can be assumed to be a scribal error for 356;30º, and consequently
the moon’s 177;30º can be corrected to 176;30º. Note that, as for the majority
of the eclipse horoscopes, the solar longitude is more accurately reproduced
by the ¼×bi’ Z÷j. The same holds for the position of Jupiter, and therewith for
the Saturn-Jupiter conjunction. The text positions of Venus and Mercury are
in error by around 1º.
in the case of the intih×’, we can find more than one a½l used in the same
horoscope.
34v:6-7 Venus is in the same position as in the radical horoscope: in
Horoscope 1 it was in 18º Taurus, in its domicile, governing the triplicity of
earth (Taurus, Virgo, Capricorn), in which we also found the sun (4;5º Tau-
rus). In Horoscope 4 Venus is also in Taurus (10º). Batt×n÷’s reference to
Venus being the lord of the triplicity of the sun should be interpreted as refer-
ring to the triplicity of earth (Taurus, Virgo, Capricorn), governed by Venus,
because the sun was in Taurus in Horoscope 1. Venus is also governing the
exaltation (sharaf) of the sun (19º Aries) because the term (¬add) of Venus is
comprised between 14º and 21º Aries. The sun is considered to be the indica-
tor (al-dal÷l) because it is above the earth.
34v:7-8 The predominance of Mercury and Venus in this horoscope indi-
cates a change in the affairs related to temples (hay×kil), revelation, and
prophecy.
34v:8-9 A third planet, Mars, is also in a position of power in Horoscope
4. Batt×n÷ has already referred to it in 34v:5-6 and now he states that Mars is
the planet associated with Venus and the moon in the government of the trip-
licity of earth, which, as we have seen, is the triplicity of the sun.
34v:10-13 From this horoscope Batt×n÷ inferred that during this year the
Prophet would announce his mission, at the age of forty. The Tih×ma is a
long and narrow region on the coast of the Red Sea, south of Mecca. The
group of Arabs who claimed prophecy are, probably, the pseudo-prophets
Musaylima, al-Aswad and Æulay¬a (see s.v. in the Encyclopaedia of Islam,
new edition), who were active toward the end of the life of the Prophet
Mu¬ammad.
34v:14 - 35r:1 In Mecca the Prophet was maltreated, so that on 20 Sep-
tember, 622, he accomplished the Hijra to Medina. The Hijri date is given as
8 Rab÷þ I, 1 Hijra (= 20 September, 622), a Monday. This checks with
Batt×n÷, vol. 2, p. 4. The text also gives an elapsed time from the Hijr÷ epoch
of 0y 2mo 8d.
We have chosen the time to a full hour so that both the ascendant and the
lunar position are correct. The text longitude for Jupiter could be a scribal
error for either 330º or 332º. Note that the calculated positions of Mercury
fall precisely in the middle of Virgo. Both z÷jes produce a conjunction of
Mars and Venus, the ¼×bi’ Z÷j making it slightly closer to the longitudes
indicated in the text. Notice that the recomputed ascendant is close to the
midpoint of Sagittarius, of which Battānī (35r:1-2) remarks that it is the as-
cendant of Horoscope 1 (6º Sagittarius).
This is followed by astrological indications which confirm the event.
35r:3-4 Mars and Venus are lords of the administration for they are con-
junct in 5º Scorpio, very near the position of the Saturn-Jupiter conjunction
(2º Scorpio) and the corresponding lunar eclipse (4;5º Scorpio) in Horoscope
1. As stated in the latter horoscope and in the corresponding commentary,
both the sign of Scorpio and Venus are related to Arabia and, especially, to
the ©ij×z.
35r: 5 Mercury (in Virgo) is in the sign of the lunar eclipse of Horoscope 4
(27;30º Virgo).
35r:9-11 Before the oath of allegiance, and before the Hijra, there was a
nocturnal lunar eclipse on 2 February, 622. This is Oppolzer lunar eclipse
2,828, dated 1 February, 622, time 21;48h after midnight. The longitudes
given by the text, together with a recomputation, are displayed below as
Horoscope 6.
In order to check the text’s designation of the intih×’ as Capricorn, note
that the date of the eclipse, 2 February, 622 is before the vernal equinox.
Hence, when computing with integer years commencing at the equinox, the
year-number of this year should be taken as 621. The nearest preceding
horoscope in the text with a checked intih×’ is Horoscope 4, dated 15 March,
610, with intih×’ at Aquarius. Here also the date is before the equinox, so
100 E.S. Kennedy, Colleagues and Former Students
that the year-number should be taken as 609. The integer years separating the
two horoscopes are 621 - 609 = 12. Hence in this interval the intih×’ ad-
vances twelve zodiacal signs, i.e., it should return to the same sign. The text
position, Capricorn, is therefore not consistent with the intihā’ of Horoscope
4. However, all remaining intihā’āt conform to that of Horoscope 6, so they
apparently depend on a different system from that of al-Sijz÷..
Horoscope 6: 35r:11-15
Lunar eclipse before the Hijra
Recomputed for Tuesday, 1 February, 622, 23:46 hours after midnight
planet / cusp text Mumta¬an Batt×n÷
Ascendant 221º 221º 221º
Midheaven 132º 132º 132º
Sun 315;28º 315;32º 315;27º
Moon 135;28º 135;15º 135;16º
Saturn 114;30º 113;40º 113;49º
Jupiter 315;28º 315;13º 316;02º
Mars 114;30º 115;18º 114;24º
Venus 293;30º 291;35º 291;58º
Mercury 293;30º 292;24º 293;11º
intih×’ Capricorn
35r:16-
35r:16-17 The Nativity Transfer of this Year
The text implies that Horoscope 7 was cast for the time of the nativity-
transfer of the Prophet during year 622. The nativity-transfer of a person
during any year subsequent to his birth is the instant during that year when
the sun attains the same longitude it had at the actual nativity.
Applying this definition, Batt×n÷ notes that at the Prophet’s nativity, in year
571, the solar longitude was 30;25º (33v:6, cf. Horoscope 2). Since 622 −571
= 51, Horoscope 7 was to be cast for such a time during the Prophet’s fifty-
first solar year of life that the solar longitude was again 30;25º. No date is
given in the text, but the recomputation below shows that the horoscope was
cast for 19 April, 622.
both signs in the count. The small years of the sun are 19, its half being 9
years and a half, to which one should add the small years of Jupiter (12) (Abý
Maþshar, pp. 88-89) expressed in months: the death of the Prophet will take
place about ten and a half years after the eclipse. The 12 extra months given
by Jupiter are due to the fact that the planet and the sun are conjunct (in
15;28º Aquarius) in a cardine (house IV). This computation tries to be more
precise than the prediction based on Horoscope 2 (for the birth of the Prophet
on 20 April 571), which considered that Mu¬ammad would live for 61 years.
The actual death of the Prophet took place, according to Batt×n÷, on 25 May
632 (Horoscope 11), while the date predicted here corresponds, approxi-
mately, to July of the same year.
35v:13-16 The sovereignty of the third conjunction (Horoscope 4), during
which the Prophet rose, corresponds to the sign of Virgo because the eclipse
of that horoscope took place in 27;30º Virgo, and 14º Virgo was the position
of midheaven in Horoscope 1. Virgo (instead of Aquarius) is, then, taken as
the intih×’ of Horoscope 4 and it is used as a starting point for the intih×’ ten
and a half years later (death of the Prophet), a value which is rounded to 11;
the result is 11 signs after Virgo, which corresponds to Cancer (including
both signs in the count). The harmful effect of the situation is confirmed by
the fact that Saturn and Mars are conjunct in 24;30º Cancer in Horoscope 6,
which corresponds to the eclipse of the accession.
35v:17 - 36r:1 If the intih×’ is calculated from the sign of the eclipse of
Horoscope 6 (in 15;28º Leo) the result will be Gemini at the solar eclipse of
the death of the Prophet (Horoscope 13, 27 January 632). At that time Mars
was in 27;30º Sagittarius, in opposition to the sign of Gemini.
36r:1 Next Batt×n÷ considers the nativity transfer of this year (622), at
which the intih×’ from the ascendant of the nativity is Pisces (see 35v:2), the
domicile of Jupiter at night. Jupiter is a benefic planet and it is in a strong
position. Unfortunately Saturn (24;30º Cancer in Horoscope 6) is in opposi-
tion to the nativity ascendant (20º Capricorn), Cancer being the dejection
(wab×l, the sign opposed to the domicile) of Saturn. Saturn is also the lord of
the ascendant of the radical horoscope: Batt×n÷ here refers to the ascendant of
the nativity (Horoscope 2: 20º Capricorn, this sign being the domicile of Sat-
urn during the day). The difficulties of this year and the Prophet’s need to
migrate from his own city are also indicated by the intih×’ calculated from
midheaven of the nativity horoscope, which corresponds again to Capricorn
(see 35v:2).
104 E.S. Kennedy, Colleagues and Former Students
Horoscope 8: 36r:9-12
Lunar eclipse near the fourth Saturn-Jupiter conjunction
Recomputed for Tuesday, 28 August, 630, 15:34 hours after midnight
planet / cusp text Mumta¬an Batt×n÷
Ascendant 291;10º * 291;22º 291;15º
Midheaven 213;05º * 214;15º 214;09º
Sun 156;37º 156;43º 156;36º
Moon 336;37º 336;38º 336;43º
Saturn 213;30º 213;29º 213;26º
Jupiter 206;30º * 206;42º 206;25º
Mars 313;30º * 312;05º 315;38º
Venus 187;30º 187;03º 187;24º
Mercury 147º 143;20º 143;59º
intih×’ Libra
Al-Battānī’s Astrological History—Commentary 105
* In the diagram the ascendant is given as 291º, midheaven is displayed in Libra instead of
Scorpio and the longitude of Jupiter is indicated as 207;30º. For Mars the degrees of longi-
tude in Aquarius have been omitted from the diagram.
Although the time of the eclipse according to both zīj es is not in optimal
agreement with the ascendant and upper midheaven, the correspondence be-
tween text and recomputation is generally good. As for most horoscopes, the
solar position is better reproduced by the ¼×bi’ Z÷j than by the Mumta¬an Z÷j.
For Mars, the two z÷jes err in opposite directions. The longitude of 147º (27º
Leo) for Mercury may be a scribal error for 144º (less probably 143º).
36r:12-36v:2 Batt×n÷ states that there was a “nocturnal solar eclipse” after
the fourth Saturn-Jupiter conjunction. This is the first mention of a solar
eclipse, in contrast to the numerous lunar eclipses already encountered.
He then gives the planetary positions of Horoscope 9 (for which there is no
diagram). These are shown in the first column of numbers in the table below.
Note that the sun and the moon are reported as having identical longitudes,
which is the necessary condition for a solar eclipse. At 36v:1 Batt×n÷ dates
this eclipse as the night of 22 Shub×Ð, 941 Byzantine = 22 February, 631. But
a recomputation for 22 February, 631, 21h, hence late at night, gave longi-
tudes of 336;9º and 162;51º for the sun and moon respectively. The differ-
ence between these longitudes being 173;18º, a solar eclipse on this date is
clearly out of the question.
In Oppolzer, p. 176, the nearest solar eclipse to 22 February, 631 is on 7
February, 631, 1:13h , listed as Solar 4,382. The two dates differ by only
fifteen days. Therefore our attempts at recomputation centered around the
latter date. Oppolzer’s Chart 88 shows that this eclipse was definitely not
visible in Mecca. This is confirmed by a modern recomputation using the
freeware programme Planetary, Lunar and Stellar Visibility (PLSV), version
3.1, designed by Rainer Lange and Noel Swerdlow (http://www.alcyone.de)..
Since no precise ascendant and midheaven are given for this horoscope, we
have determined its date and time on the basis of the true conjunction as
found from the parameters of the ¼×bi’ Z÷j. The text (at 36r:13-14) states that
at the end of the eclipse the sun was in the house of the ascendant. In fact, the
ascendant entered Aquarius at 5:10 hours after midnight. The identical solar
and lunar positions in the horoscope contain an obvious scribal error, since
the date when the sun reaches 327;27º, 14 February, is a long way from the
date of the actual conjunction, 7 February, and from the erroneous date given
by Batt×n÷, 22 February. Since Battānī’s zīj places the conjunction at 320;27º
and confusion of 27 and 20 is not uncommon, we suggest that both positions
in the text be corrected to 327;27º. Therefore the solar eclipse is perfectly
reproduced by the ¼×bi’ Z÷j. Since the eclipse was not visible in Mecca, it is
not surprising that it is the true conjunction (without correction for parallax)
that is given in the horoscope.
The remainder of the horoscope certainly was not computed for the time of
this solar eclipse, nor, as can be seen from the last column (computed for
Batt×n÷’s parameters and the same time of the day), for either of the other
dates mentioned above. For March 2, 631, the horoscope positions for Sat-
urn, Jupiter and Mars are roughly correct, but those for Venus and Mercury
are still completely off. The recomputation therefore remains unsatisfactory.
The intih×’ in the sign of Libra is the same as that mentioned in Horoscope
8 (28 August 630). As 7 February 631 (Horoscope 9) precedes the spring
equinox, both dates correspond to the same solar year if its beginning corre-
sponds to the spring equinox of year 630. Besides, both intih×’ s agree with
the sign mentioned in Horoscope 6 which, as we have seen, is not consistent
with the intih×’ of Horoscope 4.
This nativity transfer is for “the year in which the eclipse [of horoscope 9]
took place”, i.e., the transfer preceding that eclipse and the fourth Saturn-
Jupiter conjunction. The 6º in the longitude of midheaven (9s 6º) could easily
be a scribal mistake for the 7º found in the diagram and produced by recom-
putation. As we have already seen in Horoscopes 2 and 7, the solar longitude
at the time of birth of the Prophet must be corrected to 30;25º. Both the solar
and lunar longitude in the horoscope are correctly reproduced by Battānī’s zīj
for 3:46 hours after midnight, but at that time the ascendant and upper mid-
heaven at Mecca are in different zodiacal signs. The positions of Jupiter and
Mercury are reproduced slightly better by the Mumta¬an Z÷j than by the
¼×bi’ Z÷j. The text position of Mars (6s 4;40º) is presumably a mistake for 9s
4;40º or 9s 3;40º. On the basis of the recomputation it cannot be decided
whether the correct longitude for Venus is 27;20º as in the text or 27;9º as in
the diagram.
36v:7-10 The intih×’ counted from the ascendant of the nativity (Horo-
scope 2 dated 20 April 571) is Sagittarius, according to the text. This is
correct given that the ascendant of Horoscope 2 is 20º Capricorn and that
almost 59 solar years have elapsed between 20 April 571 and 19 April 630:
the intih×’ of the ascendant has completed 5 revolutions (5 x 12 = 60) minus
1 sign and, therefore, will be in Sagittarius (one sign before Capricorn). The
same argument can be applied to the intih×’ counted from midheaven of
Horoscope 2, which is Scorpio and, therefore, has reached Libra after 59
years. Jupiter is the lord of Sagittarius and Venus of Libra, because both
planets have their domiciles in the respective signs. Jupiter is in Libra in
Horoscope 10 (203;40º) and has just left Libra in Horoscope 2 (213º). The
108 E.S. Kennedy, Colleagues and Former Students
This planet is also eastern in respect to the eclipse and in retrogradation. This
implies a good influence that will improve the situation after the period of
corruption.
37r:13-15 The sign of Taurus (position of Mars) and the planet Venus are
related to the land of F×ris. There is no clear allusion to the relation between
Taurus and F×ris in B÷rýn÷ (p. 365) or Abý Maþshar (pp. 14-17), but the con-
nection is clearly stated in the Kit×b al-amÐ×r wa l-asþ×r by the Moroccan
astrologer (beginning of the 15th c.) Abý þAbd All×h al-Baqq×r (Guesmi, p.
173). Taurus is, as previously said, the domicile of Venus at night. As Mars
is spoiling both the sign of Taurus (its position) and the benefic influence of
Venus (due to the quartile aspect), the “prediction” is the destruction (hal×k)
of the king of F×ris (Yazdajird III, who reigned until the end of 632 or begin-
ning of 633) as well as many killings during this conjunction.
37r:15-16 Batt×n÷ has already established (Horoscope 1) the relation of
Scorpio with the land of the Arabs, but a specific connection with Syria
(Sh×m) is explicitly stated by al-Baqq×r (Guesmi, p. 174).
37v:1-2 Here the duration of the Prophet’s residence in Medina is reck-
oned as 9y 11mo 22d in the lunar calendar, in agreement with Batt×n÷, vol. 2,
p. 4. A computation involving 8 Rab÷þ I, 1 Hijra as the date of the Prophet’s
arrival in Medina (see 24v:15-17) and 25 May, 632 (37v:1-3), i.e., 28 ¼afar,
11 Hijra (civil), as the date of his death produces a duration of 9 lunar years,
11 months, and 20 days, two days too short.
37v:1-3 Concerning the date and time of day when the Prophet died, the
manuscript states that the event took place towards forenoon (Åu¬×) on a
Monday, 25 Adh×r, 943 Byzantine =28 Dhý l-©ijja, 10 Hijra= 25 March,
632, which was a Wednesday. This is why, in the edited text, the month has
been changed to Ayy×r, for 25 Ayy×r, 943 Byzantine = 29 ¼afar 11= 25 May,
632 Julian was a Monday. This is confirmed by Batt×n÷’s reference to the
duration of the Prophet’s residence in Medina (37v:1-2), as well as by the
recomputation of the horoscope.
The Prophet’s death is generally agreed to have been on a Monday. F.
Buhl and A. T. Welch (Encyclopaedia of Islam, new edition, vol. VII, p.
374b) assert that his death-date was 13 Rab÷þ I, 11 A.H. = 8 June, 632.
Al-Battānī’s Astrological History—Commentary 111
The time for this recomputation has been chosen in such a way that the as-
cendant is in Leo and the moon is in 11º Gemini. Note that the solar and
lunar position cannot be simultaneously correct according to either z÷j: the
Mumta¬an Zīj produces a lunar longitude near 69º when the solar longitude is
equal to 65;25º, and the ¼×bi’ Z÷j a lunar longitude near 67º. The agreement
between text and recomputation is generally very good. The position of Mars
is recomputed somewhat better using Batt×n÷’s parameters.
longitude of Jupiter as 274;10º, the longitude of Mars as 314;30º, and the longitude of Venus
as 74;10º.
38r:1-3 The passage concludes with the statement that the period of time
between the Prophet’s advent and the swearing of allegiance to him and his
death was twenty-one solar years. Batt×n÷ is thus apparently counting from
about year 610, when the Prophet began to preach (see Horoscope 4).
38r:5-6 A solar eclipse during the year 632 indicated the death of the
Prophet and the simultaneous accession of Abý Bakr. The text gives no pre-
cise date, but our recomputation shows that it was on 27 January, 632. This
is confirmed by Oppolzer, p. 176, solar eclipse 4,384, which occurred at
6:43h. Oppolzer’s Chart 88 indicates that this eclipse was annular in the
southern part of the Arabian peninsula. A modern computation by means of
the program PLSV (see p. 101) shows that in Mecca 84% of the solar disk
was eclipsed.
The time for our recomputation has been determined on the basis of the
consistent text values for the ascendant and upper midheaven. According to
the Mumta¬an Z÷j the true conjunction of sun and moon took place at 8:46
hours at an ecliptical longitude of 309;28º. According to the ¼×bi’ Z÷j it took
place at 8:30 hours at an ecliptical longitude of 309;22º. We have not inves-
tigated whether the differences from the horoscope data may be due to the
fact that we have not considered parallax. The horoscope position of Jupiter
114 E.S. Kennedy, Colleagues and Former Students
may contain a scribal error (confusion of 23º and 24º); that of Mercury con-
tains the common scribal error of 20º for 27º. The given intihā’ is consistent
with the one in Horoscopes 8 and 9, whose dates are separated by only one
vernal equinox from the date of the present horoscope.
13 days later than the date given by Battānī. The last sentences of Batt×n÷’s
text are not clear but he seems to allude to the sign of Aquarius (sign of the
ascendant and of the eclipse in Horoscope 13), which will be reached by the
intih×’ at the spring equinox of 634. Aquarius is also the last cusp (ascen-
dant) traversed by the two luminaries before the eclipse.
38v:1-
38v:1-2 The Accession of þUmar
The text states that the lunar eclipse which indicated the death of Abý Bakr
and the accession of þUmar was on the night of 17 June, 634. Oppolzer, p.
353, lunar eclipse 2,849 is 16 June, 634, at 23:30h after midnight. The horo-
scope of this eclipse is Horoscope 14 below.
Concerning the intih×’ of this horoscope, its date is after the vernal equi-
nox. Hence, when calculating with integer years its year-number is 634. The
nearest horoscope with a checked intih×’ before Horoscope 14 is Horoscope
13, dated 27 January, 632. It precedes the vernal equinox, hence its year-
number is 631. The difference between the integer years is 634 - 631 = 3, so
the intih×’ for the later horoscope, 14, is three zodiacal signs beyond that of
the earlier. This puts it in Aquarius, as in the text below.
The time of our recomputation has been based on the given ascendant.
The longitude of midheaven in text and diagram, 5º Aquarius, may be a
scribal error for 0º Aquarius. (If the time is adjusted in order to make mid-
heaven correct, the ascendant becomes 36º.) Since the ¼×bi’ Z÷j places the
eclipse at a longitude of 266;46º at 2:06 hours after midnight, and the Mum-
ta¬an Z÷j at a longitude of 266;56º at 2:26 hours after midnight, the solar and
lunar degrees in text and diagram are likely to be scribal mistakes for 86º and
266º. The erroneous horoscope positions of Saturn and Venus are more diffi-
cult to attribute to scribal errors. Note that the difference of 15 minutes
between the true solar time (2:21h) as found from the ascendant and mid-
heaven in the horoscope and the mean solar time (2:06h) of the lunar eclipse
as found from Battānī’s tables cannot be explained by the equation of time,
since, according to the ¼×bi’ Z÷j, for a solar longitude of 87º the equation of
time amounts to 4;30 equatorial degrees and hence the true time should be 18
minutes less than the mean time.
38v:5-8 Aquarius (the intih×’ ) is also the sign of the ascendant of Horo-
scope 13 (320º), considered here as the radical horoscope (al-a½l), and the
sign of the solar eclipse of the same horoscope (309;21º). The intih×’ will
reach Aries after the spring equinox of year 636, but as Batt×n÷ wishes to use
the latter sign, he computes a new intih×’ from the ascendant of the Prophet’s
nativity (Horoscope 2) in April 571 (Capricorn). Since 634 - 571 = 63, this
intih×’ has moved through five complete revolutions plus three signs, which
takes us to Aries, in which we find Mars, the indicator of the death of Abý
Bakr.
38v:9-14 Saturn (17;20º Sagittarius) is in the seventh sign from the sun
(27;47º Gemini) if one includes both signs in the count, and the distance be-
tween the two, calculated from the sun to Saturn, is 190;27º. Thus, the sun
has passed the point of exact opposition. As opposition corresponds to a
distance equivalent to half a rotation, the sun will give to the subject of the
horoscope half of its small years (19:2 = 9,5). On the other hand Jupiter, a
benefic planet, is in quartile aspect (distance 107;47) with the sun, and the
latter has also passed the exact quartile. Consequently Jupiter increases the
aforementioned period of time with half of its small years (12) counted as
months. The final result, according to the prediction, is ten years, although
Batt×n÷ states that þUmar’s caliphate was ten years, six months and nineteen
days (but see below).
38v:13-14 According to the text the caliphate of þUmar lasted 10y 6mo 19d
(lunar), although the number of days can easily be read as 17. The latter is in
Al-Battānī’s Astrological History—Commentary 117
39r:5-6 The daytime lunar eclipse indicating the death of þUmar and the
accession of þUthm×n was on 27 May, 644. It is Oppolzer, p. 353, lunar
eclipse 2,865, at 9:07h after midnight. Horoscope 16 is of this eclipse.
Since also in this horoscope the longitudes of the ascendant and upper
midheaven are incompatible (at Mecca if the ascendant is 127;9º, midheaven
should be 34º, whereas if midheaven is 48º, the ascendant should be 139º),
the recomputation has been carried out for the time of the true opposition
according to Batt×n÷’s parameters. Except for the ascendant and midheaven
the agreement is excellent. The position of Mercury is recomputed slightly
better by the ¼×bi’ Z÷j than by the Mumta¬an. The intihā’ is in agreement
with the one in Horoscope 14.
39v: 3-4 Batt×n÷ concludes that þUthm×n would die violently in public,
that there would be a rebellion, and that the duration of his caliphate would be
11y 11mo 19d lunar. This is confirmed by Batt×n÷, vol. 2, p. 4, to be the time
interval between the accession of þUthm×n on 28 Dhý al-©ijja, 23 Hijra (after
three days of deliberation), and the traditional date for the accession of þAl÷ to
the Caliphate, 17 Dhý l-©ijja, 35 Hijra = 16 June, 656 (i.e., 11 days before
þUthm×n’s purported date of death; see 39v:4 and L. Veccia Vaglieri in the
Encyclopaedia of Islam, new edition, vol. I, p. 382b).
39v:4-5 þUthm×n was murdered on 27 ©az÷r×n, 967 Byzantine = 27 June,
656. This was a Monday, corresponding to 28 Dhý l-©ijja, 35 Hijra..
39v:5-7 As the murder of þUthm×n took place in June 656, the intih×’
should be in Aquarius (it was in Sagittarius in Horoscope 16 (644), 14 years
earlier). The reference to Gemini here (wa hiya al-sana allat÷ ½×ra al-intih×’
f÷h× min al-Jawz×’ ) seems to be related to the intih×’ of the fifth conjunction
(Horoscope 17, in 650), for which it is correct. The sun was in Gemini at the
moment of the lunar eclipse of year 644 (Horoscope 16). The eclipse’s posi-
tion was 7;41º Sagittarius and the latter sign was the ascendant of Horoscope
1 (25 April 571), considered here as al-a½l. The sun in 7;41º Gemini is ap-
proaching an opposition to the place of Saturn in Horoscope 8 (3;30º
Scorpio), which is the horoscope of the lunar eclipse of the Saturn-Jupiter
conjunction of the return to the sign of the first conjunction (qir×n al-þawda).
39v:7-
39v:7-8 The Fifth Conjunction
The text states that the fifth Saturn-Jupiter conjunction occurred in the year
961 Byzantine, and that this was the sixth year of þUthm×n’s caliphate.
39v:8-9 According to the text, there was a lunar eclipse during the day on
7 Tammýz, 961 Byzantine = 7 July, 650. Oppolzer, p. 353, lists lunar eclipse
2,874 on 18 July, 650 at 21:40h , some eleven days later, so 7 July obviously
cannot be correct. However, except for the moon, the planetary positions in
the following Horoscope 17 are generally much better for a date near 7 July
than for a date near 18 July. We should therefore assume that Batt×n÷ made
an error in determining the time of the lunar eclipse and then calculated the
horoscope for the erroneous date, simply making the lunar longitude equal to
the solar longitude plus 180º. Note that according to the Mumta¬an Z÷j the
eclipse would have taken place at a longitude of 297;34º at 0:16 hours after
midnight on 19 July, and according to the ¼×bi’ Z÷j at a longitude of 297;25º
at 23:57 hours after midnight on 18 July. The recomputation below is such
Al-Battānī’s Astrological History—Commentary 121
that midheaven and the solar longitude are reproduced as accurately as possi-
ble. For that time the ascendant is in the very beginning of Capricorn. The
Saturn-Jupiter conjunction itself had already occurred on 31 May according
to the Mumta¬an Z÷j and on 2 June according to Battānī.
The position for Mars (indicated in the text as “at the end of Virgo and the
beginning of Libra”) is certainly a mistake, whereas the longitudes of Venus
and Mercury are here clearly less accurate than in nearly all the other horo-
scopes. The intihā’ is in agreement with the ones in the preceding horo-
scopes.
40r:15-16 According to the text, the killing of þUthm×n and the accession
of þAl÷ b. Ab÷ Æ×lib was indicated by a lunar eclipse on the night of 21 Octo-
ber, 655. This is Oppolzer lunar eclipse 2,883 on 21 October, 655, 0:35h after
midnight. The following horoscope is for this eclipse.
Although the time of the lunar eclipse as reproduced by either zīj does not
fully conform with the ascendant and midheaven, the further agreement is
almost complete. Both the text and the diagram value for the longitude of
Venus may be scribal mistakes for the much more accurate 6s 20;20º. The
intihā’ is in agreement with that in the preceding horoscopes, and Batt×n÷
remarks that the sign of the intih×’ (Scorpio) was also the sign of the radical
horoscope (burj al-a½l), meaning that it was the sign of the lunar eclipse and
of the Saturn-Jupiter conjunction in Horoscope 1.
40v:2-4 Mercury is also in 6;20º Scorpio. Mars (19;20º Leo) has its
domicile in Scorpio and, thus, is the lord of the sign. It would be in mid-
heaven if the ascendant happened to be in Scorpio.
124 E.S. Kennedy, Colleagues and Former Students
40v:4 Batt×n÷’s remark about the position of the moon in Aquarius is dif-
ficult to understand: the moon is in 29;43º Aries.
40v:4-5 The ascendant of Horoscope 2 (20 April 571) was 20º Capricorn
and Batt×n÷ calculates a new intih×’ from it for the end of the fifth conjunc-
tion, which should correspond to year 669 (the sixth conjunction took place
in January 670; see below). As 669 - 571 = 98, the intih×’ of the ascendant of
the revolution will have passed through 8 complete rotations + 2 signs. This
takes us to the sign of Pisces while the lunar eclipse of Horoscope 18 is in
Aries and that of Horoscope 20 (12 January 670) is in 24;11º Cancer. A good
guess is that Batt×n÷ considered year 670 (instead of 669) as the end of the
fifth conjunction, in which case the corresponding intih×’ would be in Aries.
40v:5-6 Mercury is in 6;20º Scorpio and the sign of Scorpio is the domi-
cile of Mars; furthermore it is in the first decan of Scorpio, which belongs to
Mars, and both planets are in quartile aspect (the difference of longitudes is
77º).
40v:7-11 In Horoscope 18 the sun is in the ascendant and Saturn in house
XII, and so there is no relation between the two celestial bodies; on the other
hand, the sun is in the end of the sign of Libra (29;43º), the sign of its dejec-
tion (hubýÐ) in 19º Libra. The sun is almost in the sign of Scorpio, which was
the sign of the lunar eclipse and the Saturn-Jupiter conjunction of Horoscope
1. All this indicates the murder of þUthm×n, due to the bad influence of Mer-
cury, Mars and Saturn, which is not counterbalanced by the sun.
40v:11-13 Venus (in the ascendant) rises before the sun and it is in sextile
aspect with Jupiter (difference of longitudes 63;40º). It gives þAl÷’s caliphate
its (Venus’s) eight small years (Abý Maþshar, pp. 88-89), which does not
agree with Batt×n÷’s “prediction” according to which the caliphate lasted 4
years and 9 months; maybe the original text read “half of its small years”.
This is due to the favorable conditions mentioned above. Otherwise, it would
not have reached this length of time because of the bad configuration of Ve-
nus and Saturn (they are in opposition) and the situation of Venus (6;20º
Libra) very near the degree of its dejection (27º Libra).
40v:13 þAl÷’s caliphate lasted 4 years and 9 months (lunar), in agreement
with Batt×n÷, vol. 2, p. 4. þAl÷’s accession to the caliphate took place on 17
Dhý l-©ijja, 35 Hijra (see above), and he died (see 41r:6) on 17 RamaÅ×n, 40
Hijra. The difference between these two dates is indeed precisely 4y 9mo.
40v:13-16 Actually Mars is not in the ascendant of Horoscope 18 but in
house XI instead; it is true, however that midheaven in this horoscope (94º) is
in the house of Mars in Horoscope 1 (104º) near the position of the moon in
Al-Battānī’s Astrological History—Commentary 125
the nativity of the Prophet (Horoscope 2: 122º). Besides, the position of Mars
(19;20º Leo) corresponds to midheaven if the ascendant is Scorpio.
40v:16-17 Venus (186;20º) is in the ascendant (184º) of Horoscope 18 and
in its domicile in daytime (Libra), and it is in sextile aspect with Jupiter,
which has benefic consequences for the religious situation.
40v:17 - 41r:3 During its daily rotation the eclipsed moon (29;43º) crossed
midheaven (94º) before the eclipse, and Mars, in Horoscope 1, was in 14º
Cancer, which corresponds to midheaven of Horoscope 18; this sign is also
the moon’s domicile, which implies that the moon governs it. Besides, the
position of the moon in Horoscope 18 (29;43º) is in quartile aspect with the
position of Mars in Horoscope 1 (104º), because the difference of longitudes
between the two planets is 74;17º, which means that Mars (Horoscope 1) is in
the third sign from that of the moon (Horoscope 18). All this implies a posi-
tion of power for Mars and allows Batt×n÷ to “predict” wars and quarrels.
41r:3-6 Batt×n÷ adds to this a new intih×’, computed from the position of
the eclipse (29;43º), which he considers to correspond approximately to the
sign of Taurus, although he actually calculates the advance from Aries. By
the time of þAl÷’s death (14 January 661), five years will have elapsed from
the date of the eclipse (21 October 655). This means that the intih×’ will have
progressed five signs and reached the sign of Virgo. Virgo corresponds to the
position of Saturn (173º) in the eclipse of þAl÷’s accession (Horoscope 18),
which is in opposition to the position of Mars (342º) in the eclipse of þAl÷’s
death (Horoscope 19), the difference of longitudes between the two amount-
ing to 169º.
41r:5-6 þAl÷ died on 24 January, 661, corresponding to 17 RamaÅ×n, 40
Hijra (civil).
Small errors are found in the horoscope positions of Saturn and Jupiter,
whereas that for Mercury (9s 10;30º) seems to contain a scribal error (10º for
20º). The intihā’ is in agreement with that in the preceding horoscopes.
The astrological indications follow. These infer, among other things, the
rise of Marw×n b. al-©akam and þAbdall×h b. Zubayr, and their subsequent
displacement by the resuscitated Umayyads. The latter were in turn replaced
by the Baný Marw×n.
41v:4-5 From the indications, the length of the reign of Muþ×wiya is in-
ferred as 19y 3mo 25d (lunar). This is confirmed by Batt×n÷, vol. 2, p. 4. The
text states that this span reaches to 30 N÷s×n of a year that may in the manu-
script be read as either 972 or 992 Byzantine. The further data in the text and
the table in Battānī’s zīj, however, indicate that the Byzantine year intended is
991, so the above date stands for 30 April, 680 = 24 Rajab, 60 Hijra. Also
according to M. Hinds (Encyclopaedia of Islam, new edition, vol. VII, p.
264a), Muþ×wiya died in Rajab of the year 60 Hijra. Thus taking 24 Rajab,
60 Hijra as the death date of Muþ×wiya, and considering that, according to
Batt×n÷, vol. 2, p. 4, there was a period of 6 months and 3 days until Muþ×-
wiya was officially recognized as Caliph after þAl÷’s death on 17 RamaÅ×n,
40 Hijra (see 41r:6), the length of his reign becomes 19y 4mo 4d. This leaves a
difference of only nine days from the text and Batt×n÷’s z÷j which we cannot
conclusively account for. It might be explained by assuming that the date in
the text should be 21 instead of 30 Nīsān, 991 Byzantine, which corresponds
to the date 15 Rajab, 60 Hijra given in Battānī, vol. 2, p. 4.
41v:5-6 The sun has passed midheaven (8º Aquarius), and the lord of the
sign of Aquarius is Saturn because it has its domicile in it at night. Saturn is
also in quartile aspect with the sign of midheaven (difference of longitudes
77º).
41v:6-7 Mercury is in sextile aspect with Saturn (difference of longitudes
49;30º), which is in opposition to Jupiter (diff. long. 175º); this favors the
benefic influence of Jupiter.
41v:8-11 The final passage of Batt×n÷’s astrological commentary is diffi-
cult to understand. One can try to interpret its first sentence as meaning that
the intih×’ computed from the solar position of Horoscope 19 (Capricorn)
reaches the sign of the eclipse in the same horoscope (Cancer). The problem
is that Batt×n÷ does not specify which period of time he means. To this he
adds that the intih×’ counted from the ascendant of the nativity (Horoscope 2,
Capricorn) reaches the same sign as the eclipse of Horoscope 19. The date of
the Prophet’s nativity is 20 April 571 and that of Horoscope 19 is 22 Decem-
ber 660. Assuming that the intih×’ changes in the spring equinox, the number
of years elapsed between the two dates will be 660 - 571 = 89 years, during
which the intih×’ will have passed through seven complete rotations plus five
signs and it will have reached the sign of Gemini, not Cancer. It is clear,
however, that Batt×n÷ refers to the sign of Cancer, which is the sign of Saturn
in the eclipse of Muþ×wiya’s death (Horoscope 21) and the sign of the sun in
Horoscope 19. From Cancer, now identified with the sign of the eclipse in
Horoscope 20, we calculate the corresponding intih×’ in Horoscope 20 (12
128 E.S. Kennedy, Colleagues and Former Students
January 670), which corresponds to the lunar eclipse preceding the sixth con-
junction of Saturn and Jupiter; as the latter date takes place before the spring
equinox, the calculation is 669 - 660 = 9, which implies that the intih×’ has
progressed nine signs from Cancer, thus reaching Aries, in which we find
Mars in Horoscope 21 (the eclipse of Muþ×wiya’s death).
41v:11-
41v:11-12 The Sixth Conjunction
The sixth conjunction occurred during the year 980 Byzantine in the life-
time of Muþ×wiya. According to Tuckerman, p. 353, it occurred on 27
January, 670 at longitude 329;53º (in the air triplicity). The text says that
during the conjunction there was a lunar eclipse in the night of 12 K×nýn II.
On 12 January, 670, at 0:50h, Oppolzer, p. 354, reports lunar eclipse 2,905,
which satisfies the requirements of Horoscope 20 below. For K×nýn II, 980
Byzantine to coincide with January 670 the Byzantine year would have to
start with the month Adh×r (March). This arrangement was less common, but
was in fact used by Battānī in the tables of his zīj (see, for example, Battānī,
vol. 2, p. 74). However, both at 34v:17 and in Battānī, vol. 1, p. 67 (corre-
sponding to vol. 3, p. 100) Aylūl is mentioned as the first month of the year.
It thus seems more plausible that the Byzantine year 980 in the text is a mis-
take for 981.
The recomputation has been carried out for the time at which the ascendant
and upper midheaven are in full agreement with the text. Since the ¼×bi’ Z÷j
places the lunar eclipse at 114;51º and the Mumta¬an Z÷j at 114;55º, it seems
possible that both the solar and the lunar position contain a scribal error (11′
instead of 51′). The conjunction of Saturn and Jupiter implied by the horo-
scope is confirmed by the recomputations, but is positioned in the wrong
degree of the ecliptic. This may also be attributed to a scribal error (23º for
26º or 27º), although this confusion is not very common. Both for Venus and
for Mars the recomputation on the basis of Batt×n÷’s parameters is slightly
better than that from the Mumta¬an Z÷j. The intihā’ Sagittarius is not in
agreement with that in the preceding horoscopes, according to which it
should have been Capricorn. Since it is not in agreement with the system of
al-Sijz÷ either, according to which it should have been in Aquarius, we may
assume that it is a mistake, although it seems clear that Batt×n÷’s following
argument is based on Sagittarius.
Calculating with the parameters from Battānī’s zīj, the first to fifth true
conjunctions are found to take place at the following dates and degrees:
Zubayr) because:
1) The next conjunction, called the conjunction of the return (qir×n al-þawda),
returned to the sign of Scorpio, a sign belonging to the triplicity of water.
Battānī here refers to the seventh conjunction of Saturn and Jupiter occur-
ring on 3-4 March 690 in 21;9º Scorpio, with which the true conjunction
returned to the triplicity of water (Cancer, Scorpio, Pisces), after the sixth
had been in Aquarius (triplicity of air). Batt×n÷ also mentions an eclipse in
connection with this conjunction, which was most likely the full lunar
eclipse on 28 May 690, which took place in 7º Capricorn according to Bat-
tānī’s zīj. At this time Saturn and Jupiter were already 3º away from each
other but still in Scorpio.
2) As we have seen, in Horoscope 20 Mars is very near the beginning of
Aquarius but not precisely in this sign, as it was (Aquarius 13;30º) in
Horoscope 8 (eclipse of the fourth conjunction).
These two reasons invalidate the possibility of a change of dynasty repre-
sented by Ibn al-Zubayr.
42r:12-
42r:12-14 Accession of Yaz÷d b. Muþ×wiya
The nocturnal lunar eclipse which indicated the death of Muþ×wiya and the
accession of his son Yaz÷d was on 22 December, 679. It is Oppolzer, lunar
eclipse 2,920 on 23 December, 679, time after midnight 1:38h. The last horo-
scope in Battānī’s treatise is for this eclipse.
At Mecca, when midheaven is at 150º, the ascendant is 237º. Thus the po-
sitions indicated in the text, respectively “at the end of Scorpio” and “at the
beginning of Virgo”, are in agreement. There seems to be an error in the
horoscope position for Jupiter, but all other positions are accurate. The in-
tihā’ is in agreement with the one in Horoscope 19 and the preceding horo-
scopes, confirming that the incorrect intihā’ given in Horoscope 20 was a
mistake. Batt×n÷ remarks that Scorpio is the sign of the radical horoscope,
meaning that it is the sign of the Saturn-Jupiter conjunction and of the lunar
eclipse in Horoscope 1.
42r:17 - 42v:2 The lunar eclipse is in 4;5º Cancer, which is the sign occu-
pied by Mars (14º Cancer) in Horoscope 1. Mars (20º Aries) is in quartile
aspect with the position of the eclipse (4;5º Cancer), both in Horoscope 21
(difference of longitudes 70;5º), as well as with the ascendant of the nativity
horoscope (Horoscope 2: difference of exactly 90º).
42v:2 Saturn is in 14;20º Cancer, which is the sign of the eclipse. The sun
(4;5º Capricorn) is in opposition to Saturn, which, according to Batt×n÷, indi-
cates the death of Muþ×wiya.
42v:3 Cancer is a solstitial sign, and the moon, which has its domicile in
this sign, is the lord which occupies this solstitial sign.
42v:3-5 The opposition of Saturn and the sun is harmful and the sun is
progressing towards the degree of opposition which it will attain in about
eleven days. The sun (4;5º Capricorn) is in quartile aspect with Mars ( 14º
Cancer) and with Saturn ( 14;20º Cancer). This implies that the sun will give
to the subject of the horoscope one fifth of its small years (19), which corre-
sponds to 3 years, 9 months and 18 days. This is due to the favorable situa-
tion created by Venus (in 12º Capricorn), which is in the same sign of the sun
and rises after it.
42v:6-7 According to the text, the reign of Yaz÷d would last 3y 3mo (lunar).
Batt×n÷, vol. 2, p. 4, has 3y 8mo 0d, which is apparently the correct value since
Yazīd died on 15 Rab÷þ I, 64 Hijra (see below), whereas the end of the rule of
his predecessor Muþ×wiya is given as 24 Rajab, 60 Hijra at 41v:4-5 (the exact
time period between these dates is 3y 7m 21d) and as 15 Rajab, 60 Hijra, in
Battānī’s zīj. Although the number of months is written in words in the text,
it seems possible that the error ultimately stems from a confusion of abjad 3
and 8.
42v:7-8 The death date of Yaz÷d is given as 11 Tishr÷n II, 995 Byzantine =
11 November, 683 = 15 Rab÷þ I, 64 Hijra. This is confirmed by G.R. Haw-
132 E.S. Kennedy, Colleagues and Former Students
ting (Encyclopaedia of Islam, new edition, vol. XI, p. 309b/310a), who states
that he died in Rab÷þ I, 64 Hijra.
42v:8-11 Finally Batt×n÷ computes a new intih×’ from the sign of the
eclipse of Horoscope 21 (Cancer, 23 December 679), apparently for the date
of Yaz÷d’s death (11 November 683). If we assume that the change of sign of
the intih×’ takes place in the spring equinox of each year, the intih×’ should
be in Scorpio (not in Libra) in November 683. The situation changes, how-
ever, if the date of change corresponds to the moment of the eclipse of
Horoscope 21 (December 679): in that case Libra would be correct. What-
ever the case, Mars is, in this horoscope, in 20º Aries, in opposition to Libra.
Venus has just crossed midheaven (0º Virgo), which is the domicile of Mer-
cury in daytime, and this planet is in 22º Capricorn, a solstitial sign, in
quartile aspect with Mars (the difference of longitudes being 88º), meaning
that the evil influence of Mars is reinforced by Mercury.
42v:12 Colophon.
3
Extensive use was also made of Van Dalen’s DOS programs CALH (for the conversion
of dates in more than ten different calendars used in Islamic astronomical works) and SCTR
(for carrying out calculations in the sexagesimal system). DOS programs can still be run on
most Windows system, if necessary in a DOS emulator such as DOSBox. All three programs
may be obtained from Benno van Dalen at no cost.
Al-Battānī’s Astrological History—Commentary 133
The parameters
parameters used for the calculation of the horoscopes
At 31v:17 the text states clearly that the planetary positions in the horoscopes
were determined “according to the Mumta¬an computations”, i.e., presuma-
bly according to the tables in the Mumta¬an Z÷j by Ya¬y× ibn Ab÷ Man½ýr
(ca. AD 830). The recomputations presented here are therefore based on pa-
rameters explicitly found in, or extracted from, the extant recension of the
Mumta¬an Z÷j in the manuscript Escorial ms. árabe 927. Although the value
23º35′ for the obliquity of the ecliptic has also been associated with astrono-
mers belonging to the Mumta¬an group, here we have used the value
23º33′0″ found in the declination table in the Escorial manuscript. All pa-
rameters used in the recomputations are listed in Appendix C. For compa-
rison, the horoscopes were also recomputed for the parameters of Batt×n÷’s
¼×bi’ Z÷j (including the value 23º35′ for the obliquity of the ecliptic; note
that we do not know whether Batt×n÷’s astrological history was written before
or after the ¼×bi’ Z÷j).
For practical purposes, we will call a recomputed position “correct” if it
differs by less than 30′ from the horoscope value, even if the latter is given to
an accuracy of minutes. For the slowest planet, Saturn, both the Mumta¬an
Z÷j and the ¼×bi’ Z÷j produce correct positions for 14 out of 20 horoscopes
(Horoscope 15 does not list the positions of the five planets) and almost iden-
tical positions for the remaining six; it seems plausible that in those cases the
horoscope contains a scribal or possibly computational error. Also for Jupiter
and Venus the two z÷jes produce similarly good positions, although the num-
ber of deviations is somewhat larger. However, for Mars we find noticeable
discrepancies in the recomputations: in only six out of 20 cases both z÷jes
produce the same position as found in the horoscope; in four cases they are
both off by similar amounts. In seven of the remaining eight horoscopes
Batt×n÷’s parameters for Mars produce a noticeably better fit. The situation is
somewhat similar for Mercury, for which the ¼×bi’ Z÷j gives a better result in
six cases, the Mumta¬an Z÷j in two (in the remaining nine horoscopes the
produced positions are very close to each other). Since, as will be shown
below, the solar longitudes and the positions at which solar and lunar eclipses
take place are also more accurately produced by Batt×n÷’s parameters than by
those of Ya¬y×, there is some reason to believe that Batt×n÷ in fact used the
parameters from his own z÷j for computing the horoscopes, in spite of what
he writes in the text. Therefore we will present recomputed values for the
Mumta¬an Z÷j as well as for the ¼×bi’ Z÷j. Cases in which the two z÷jes yield
clearly different planetary positions are mentioned in the remarks following
134 E.S. Kennedy, Colleagues and Former Students
Folio 31v, line 16 of the text connects the horoscope of the birth of the
Prophet (Horoscope 1) with Mecca. Since all horoscopes are related to the
life of the Prophet and the early history of Islam, it seems a reasonable asser-
tion that they were all cast for Mecca. This can in fact be verified by esti-
mating the geographical latitude underlying the ecliptical longitudes of the
ascendant and midheaven presented for most of the horoscopes. This estima-
tion is carried out here by means of the method described in North, pp. 17-20.
The table below lists, for each horoscope with the ascendant and midheaven
given to an accuracy of at least degrees, the estimated geographical latitude
plus a plausible interval for the latitude obtained by varying the ascendant
and midheaven by a degree. Note that only four longitudes of ascendants and
midheavens have an explicit number of minutes, but that these also appear to
be rounded rather than computed exactly. In each case, the obliquity of the
ecliptic was taken equal to the Mumta¬an value 23º33′. If Batt×n÷’s value
23º35′ were used, the estimated latitude values would differ by at most 4′
from those presented in the table. Note that, depending on the nearness of the
ascendant and midheaven to multiples of 90º, the confidence interval may
become very large.
In spite of the presence of various “outliers” and generally very large plau-
sible intervals, it seems probable that the horoscopes were cast for Mecca,
which occurs in the earliest Islamic geographical tables with latitude 21º0′, in
later ones with 21º40′. Since the results of the estimation do not allow us to
distinguish between these two values, we will recompute the longitude of the
ascendant and midheaven in all horoscopes for the earlier value of the geo-
graphical latitude, namely 21º0′ (the difference of 40′ in the latitude leads to
differences of at most 20′ in the ascendant).
The geographical longitude underlying the horoscopes cannot be deter-
mined with certainty. Since a change in geographical longitude is equivalent
to a change in local time, we would need to know the exact times of day for
which the horoscopes were cast in order to be able to determine the underly-
ing geographical longitude. However, these times are never explicitly men-
tioned, and where they can be reliably determined from the longitudes of the
ascendant and midheaven they are usually not in precise agreement with the
remainder of the horoscope, in particular with the lunar longitude or the time
of the connected conjunction or opposition. We will therefore simply assume
that the horoscopes were calculated for the geographical longitude of Mecca,
which, according to most Islamic geographical tables, lies 3º west of Bagh-
dad, where the Mumta¬an observations were made, and 1º east of Raqqa, the
base locality of Batt×n÷’s ¼×bi’ Z÷j.
As we noted above, the exact time of day for which each horoscope was cast
is not indicated in Batt×n÷’s text. However, in most cases the time can be
determined with reasonable accuracy from the longitude of the ascendant or
midheaven. If the two longitudes are not fully compatible with the latitude of
Mecca, and hence the two times that are obtained from them are different,
136 E.S. Kennedy, Colleagues and Former Students
preference will be given to the more important of the two, the ascendant. A
few horoscopes for which the time cannot be reliably determined from the
ascendant or midheaven will be recomputed for the time at which, according
to the parameters of the ¼×bi’ Z÷j, the associated solar or lunar eclipse took
place or the lunar position was in agreement with the horoscope.
For 14 of the 21 horoscopes, the time of day for which they were cast can
be determined from the longitudes of the ascendant and/or midheaven as well
as by calculating the exact moment of the associated true opposition or con-
junction of sun and moon. We have performed these calculations not only on
the basis of the Mumta¬an Z÷j and the ¼×bi’ Z÷j, but also using Ptolemy’s
Almagest and the z÷j of ©abash al-©×sib, another astronomer connected to the
Mumta¬an group. We were not able to find a relationship between the times
for which Batt×n÷ most likely calculated his horoscopes and the times of the
true oppositions and conjunctions found from any of these four astronomical
works. The differences in time are typically of the order of half an hour, and
the syzygies occur sometimes earlier and sometimes later than the times cal-
culated from the ascendant and/or midheaven. Generally the differences are
too large (and too unsystematic) to be explainable by the use of different geo-
graphical base localities. At first sight the divergences are also too irregular
and too large to be caused by consideration of the equation of time, but we
have not generally investigated this possibility in detail. In the three cases of
solar eclipses we have not investigated whether Battānī included the lunar
parallax in his computations.
Note that in calculating the time from the ascendant and / or midheaven it
does not make a significant difference whether the Mumta¬an Z÷j is used or
the ¼×bi’ Z÷j (the calculation involves the obliquity of the ecliptic and the true
solar longitude, which vary only minimally between the two z÷jes). However,
the positions of the sun and the moon at the time of an opposition or conjunc-
tion are generally much better reproduced by Batt×n÷’s solar and lunar theory
(typical errors of 0–2 minutes of arc) than by Ya¬y×’s parameters (errors
between 6 and 10 minutes of arc). As was mentioned above, for Mars and
Mercury the ¼×bi’ Z÷j also produces a somewhat better fit with the longitudes
in the horoscopes than the Mumta¬an Z÷j. All in all, it seems more likely that
Battānī computed the horoscopes with his own zīj than with the Mumta¬an
Z÷j.
The recomputations of the syzygies on the basis of the ¼×bi’ Z÷j have al-
lowed us to correct a number of scribal errors in the solar and lunar positions;
in all these cases the two positions differ by precisely 0º or 180º, but the re-
computation shows that in all likelihood the lunar position was obtained
Al-Battānī’s Astrological History—Commentary 137
directly from the solar position or vice versa rather than by an independent
computation. Note that, since in most cases we determine the time for which
the horoscopes were cast from the longitudes of ascendant and/or midheaven
rather than from the associated opposition or conjunction, the agreement of
the solar and lunar positions with the recomputed values is usually not as
good as it could have been. However, following this particular procedure we
reach the best overall agreement of the horoscopes with the recomputation.
Other remarks
Oppolzer’s canon of solar and lunar eclipses gives the times of the eclipses in
“Weltzeit”, i.e. Universal Time. Since Mecca has a longitude of nearly 40º
east of Greenwich, this time can be converted to local time by adding 2h40m.
for the solar longitude, since the sun needs around 25 minutes to move
through one minute of arc, and for the lunar longitude if it is given to degrees
(the moon takes nearly two hours to travel through a degree). The ascendant
and midheaven change by a whole degree in only four minutes, whereas the
moon travels through a minute of arc in around two minutes of time. Note
that we have assumed the use of modern rounding of the planetary longi-
tudes. Thus, if, according to the horoscope, the sun is located in 4;5º Taurus
(34;5º), the intervals given below are those for which, according to the two
zīj es, the unrounded longitude lies between 34;4,30º and 34;5,30º. For other
types of rounding, trivial adjustments would be necessary.
Since it is beyond the scope of this publication to compare Ya¬y×’s and
Batt×n÷’s planetary theory with modern computations, the column “modern”
only contains the times of solar and lunar eclipses. These were taken from
Oppolzer’s Canon and adjusted for the difference in geographical longitude
between Greenwich and Mecca by adding 2:40 hours. Oppolzer’s times dif-
fer by amounts up to 20 minutes from calculations based on the theory
underlying, e.g., Tuckermann’s tables.
Horoscope 1:
Saturday, 25 April, 571, 20:36 hours after midnight (lunar eclipse)
phenomenon Mumta¬an Batt×n÷ modern
Ascendant in 246º 20:36 20:36
Midheaven in 164º 20:46 20:46
Sun in 34;5º (scribal error?) 23 April, 15:30 23 April, 19:14
Sun in 36;5º 17:13–17:37 20:58–21:22
Moon in 214;5º (scribal error?) 16:33 16:34
Moon in 216;5º 19:58 19:59
Sun-Moon opposition: time 20:11 19:54 20:23
Sun-Moon opposition: long. 216;12º 216;2º
Horoscope 2:
Monday, 20 April, 571, 0:09 hours after midnight (birth of the Prophet)
Times between 19:53 and 24:00 hours here refer to Monday, 19 April.
phenomenon Mumta¬an Batt×n÷
Ascendant in 290º 0:09 0:09
Midheaven: not given
Sun in 30;25º 19:53–20:17 23:34–23:58
Moon in 122º (scribal error?) 18 April, 16:10 18 April, 16:03
Al-Battānī’s Astrological History—Commentary 139
Horoscope 3:
Wednesday, 18 October, 590, 21:19 hours after midnight (lunar eclipse)
phenomenon Mumta¬an Batt×n÷ modern
Ascendant in 85º 21:19 21:19
Midheaven in 344º 21:20 21:20
Sun in 207;4º 17:09–17:32 19:29–19:52
Moon in 27;4º 20:33 20:33
Sun-Moon opposition: time 20:48 20:37 20:53
Sun-Moon opposition: long. 27;13º 27;6º
Horoscope 4:
Sunday, 15 March, 610, 10:47 hours after midnight (lunar eclipse)
phenomenon Mumta¬an Batt×n÷ modern
Ascendant in 79º 10:47 10:47
Midheaven in 337º 10:47 10:48
Sun in 357;30º (scribal error?) 16 March, 8:19 16 March, 11:09
Sun in 356;30º (corrected) 7:40–8:03 10:29–10:52
Moon in 177;30º (scribal error?) 12:31 12:25
Moon in 176;30º (corrected) 10:35 10:29
Sun-Moon opposition: time 10:48 10:28 11:11
Sun-Moon opposition: long. 176;37º 176;29º
Horoscope 5:
Monday, 20 September, 622, 11:00 hours after midnight (Hijra)
phenomenon Mumta¬an Batt×n÷
Ascendant in Sagittarius 10:28–12:41 10:26–12:39
Midheaven: not given - -
Sun in 179º 19 Sept, 20:26– 19 Sept, 22:59–
20 Sept, 20:38 20 Sept, 23:10
Moon in 302º 9:36–11:29 9:32–11:25
Horoscope 6:
Tuesday, 1 February, 622, 23:46 hours after midnight (lunar eclipse)
Note that, for this horoscope, 24:07 indicates 0:07 on the following day, 2
February.
140 E.S. Kennedy, Colleagues and Former Students
Horoscope 7:
Monday, 19 April, 622, 6:50 hours after midnight (nativity transfer)
phenomenon Mumta¬an Batt×n÷
Ascendant in Taurus 5:40–7:24 5:41–7:25
Midheaven in Aquarius 6:16–8:14 6:16–8:14
Sun in 30;25º 2:18–2:42 5:34–5:58
Moon in 73;30º (scribal error?) 20 April, 12:22 20 April, 12:17
Moon in 58;30º (correction) 6:56 6:50
Horoscope
Horoscope 8:
Tuesday, 28 August, 630, 15:34 hours after midnight (lunar eclipse)
phenomenon Mumta¬an Batt×n÷ modern
Ascendant in 291;10º 15:33 15:34
Midheaven in 213;5º 15:29 15:30
Sun in 156;37º 12:59–13:23 15:51–16:15
Moon in 336;37º 15:31 15:22
Sun-Moon opposition: time 15:43 15:18 15:29
Sun-Moon opposition: long. 336;43º 336;35º
Horoscope 9:
Thursday, 7 February, 631, 3:23 hours after midnight (solar eclipse)
phenomenon Mumta¬an Batt×n÷ modern
Sun in 327;27º (scribal error) 14 February 14 February
Sun in 320;27º (corrected) 1:02–1:25 3:05–3:28
Moon in 327;27º (scribal error) 17:24 17:16
Moon in 320;27º (corrected) 3:31 3:23
Sun-Moon conjunction: time 3:43 3:23 3:53
Sun-Moon conjunction: long. 320;33º 320;27º
Al-Battānī’s Astrological History—Commentary 141
Horoscope 10:
Thursday, 19 April, 630, 4:37 hours after midnight (nativity transfer)
phenomenon Mumta¬an Batt×n÷
Ascendant in 10º 4:37 4:37
Midheaven in 276º 4:32 4:33
Sun in 35;25º (scribal error) 24 April 24 April
Sun in 30;25º (corrected) 0:29–0:53 3:41–4:05
Moon in 38;30º 3:52 3:46
Horoscope 11:
Monday, 25 May, 632, 9:00 hours after midnight (death of the Prophet)
phenomenon Mumta¬an Batt×n÷
Sun in 65;25º 0:57–1:22 4:29–4:53
Moon in 71º 8:08–10:09 7:59–10:00
Mars in 345;30º 27 May, 6:47 11:13–11:47
Venus in 105;40º 10:52–11:12 6:40–7:01
Mercury in 91º 16:20–26 May, 11:33 12:20–26 May, 8:36
Horoscope 12:
Saturday, 18 April, 632, 16:24 hours after midnight (nativity transfer)
phenomenon Mumta¬an Batt×n÷
Ascendant in 184º 16:23 16:24
Midheaven in 94º 16:23 16:24
Sun in 35;25º (scribal error) 23 April, 16:52 23 April, 20:07
Sun in 30;25º (corrected) 12:02–12:26 15:13–15:37
Moon in 315;20º 14:10 14:07
Horoscope 13:
Monday, 27 January, 632, 7:05 hours after midnight (solar eclipse)
phenomenon Mumta¬an Batt×n÷ modern
Ascendant in 320º 7:06 7:06
Midheaven in 240;5º 7:04 7:04
Sun in 309;21º 5:52–6:15 7:46–8:09
Moon in 309;21º 8:33 8:28
Sun-Moon conjunction: time 8:46 8:30 9:23
Sun-Moon conjunction: long. 309;28º 309;22º
142 E.S. Kennedy, Colleagues and Former Students
Horoscope 14:
Friday, 17 June, 634, 2:21 hours after midnight (lunar eclipse)
phenomenon Mumta¬an Batt×n÷ modern
Ascendant in 40º 2:20 2:21
Midheaven in 305º 2:43 2:43
Sun in 87;47º (scribal error?) 18 June, 0:00 18 June, 3:34
Sun in 86;47º (corrected) 16 June, 22:49 2:11–2:35
Moon in 267;[47º] (scribal error?) 3:53 3:50
Moon in 266;47º 2:11 2:08
Sun-Moon opposition: time 2:26 2:06 2:10
Sun-Moon opposition: long. 266;56º 266;46º
Horoscope 15:
Wednesday, 1 June, 634, 16:03 hours after midnight (solar eclipse)
phenomenon Mumta¬an Batt×n÷ modern
Ascendant in 244º 17:59 17:59
Midheaven in [4s] 23º 16:58 16:59
Midheaven in [5s] 23º 18:51 18:52
Sun in 72;3º 11:30–11:54 15:02–15:26
Moon in 72;3º 16:06 15:59
Sun-Moon conjunction: time 16:27 16:03 16:23
Sun-Moon conjunction: long. 72;14º 72;5º
Horoscope 16:
Thursday, 27 May, 644, 11:08 hours after midnight (lunar eclipse)
phenomenon Mumta¬an Batt×n÷ modern
Ascendant in 127;9º 9:45 9:45
Midheaven in 48º 10:38 10:39
Sun in 67;41º 7:14–7:38 10:41-11:05
Moon in 247;41º 11:14 11:06
Sun-Moon opposition: time 11:33 11:08 11:47
Sun-Moon opposition: long. 247;51º 247;42º
Horoscope 17:
Thursday, 8 July, 650, 17:28 hours after midnight (lunar eclipse)
phenomenon Mumta¬an Batt×n÷ modern
Ascendant in Capricorn 17:22–19:24 17:23–19:24
Al-Battānī’s Astrological History—Commentary 143
Horoscope 18:
Wednesday, 21 October, 655, 4:27 hours after midnight (lunar eclipse)
phenomenon Mumta¬an Batt×n÷ modern
Ascendant in 184º 4:26 4:26
Midheaven in 94º 4:26 4:27
Sun in 209;43º 0:35–0:58 2:23–2:47
Moon in 29;43º 3:33 3:27
Sun-Moon opposition: time 3:47 3:31 3:15
Sun-Moon opposition: long. 29;51º 29;45º
Horoscope 19:
Tuesday, 22 December, 660, 14:24 hours after midnight (lunar eclipse)
phenomenon Mumta¬an Batt×n÷ modern
Ascendant in 50º 14:24 14:24
Midheaven in 308º 14:24 14:24
Sun in 274;6º 12:21–12:44 13:43–14:06
Moon in 94;6º 14:07 13:57
Sun-Moon opposition: time 14:15 13:57 14:22
Sun-Moon opposition: long. 94;10º 94;6º
Horoscope 20:
Friday, 12 January, 670, 3:22 hours after midnight (lunar eclipse)
phenomenon Mumta¬an Batt×n÷ modern
Ascendant in 250º 3:22 3:22
Midheaven in 166º 3:21 3:21
Sun in 294;11º (scribal error?) 11 Jan., 10:19 11 Jan., 11:44
Sun in 294;51º (corrected) 1:53–2:16 3:19–3:41
Moon in 114;11º (scribal error?) 2:04 1:53
144 E.S. Kennedy, Colleagues and Former Students
Horoscope 21:
Friday, 23 December, 679, 4:01 hours after midnight (lunar eclipse)
phenomenon Mumta¬an Batt×n÷ modern
Ascendant in 239º 4:01 4:01
Midheaven in 150º 3:50 3:51
Sun in 274;5º 2:02–2:25 3:15–3:38
Moon in 94;5º 3:43 3:35
Sun-Moon opposition: time 3:50 3:35 4:18
Sun-Moon opposition: long. 94;9º 94;5º
All calculations of planetary positions have been carried out on the basis of
the following parameters. Some of these have been taken directly from the
tables in the Mumta¬an Z÷j and the ¼×bi’ Z÷j, others have been derived from
those tables in such a way that our calculations result in numbers as close as
possible to those that would be obtained directly from the tables. Note that
both zīj es use different epochs for the mean longitudes, centrums, and anom-
alies on the one hand and the apogees on the other.
Bibliography
Bibliography
Blochet: Edgar Blochet, Catalogue des manuscrits arabes des nouvelles ac-
quisitions (1884-1924). Leroux, Paris, 1925.
Conrad: Lawrence I. Conrad, “Abraha and Mu¬ammad. Some Observations
a propos of Chronology and Literary Topoi in the Early Arabic Historical
Tradition”. B.S.O.A.S. 50 (1987), 225-240. Reprinted in Uri Rubin (ed.),
The Life of Mu¬ammad. The Formation of the Classical Islamic World,
vol. 4. Ashgate Variorum, Aldershot, 1998, 41-56.
van Dalen 1: Benno van Dalen, “A Second Manuscript of the Mumta¬an
Z÷j”. Suhayl 4 (2004), 9-44.
van Dalen 2: Benno van Dalen, Article “al-Battānī”. In Thomas Hockey et
al. (eds.), Biographical Encyclopedia of Astronomers. Springer, New
York, 2007, 101-103
Díaz Fajardo: Montse Díaz-Fajardo, Tasy÷r y proyección de rayos en textos
astrológicos magrebíes. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Barcelona, 2009.
The full text of this dissertation in PDF format is available from the web-
site http://www.tesisenxarxa.net/TDX-0309109-112444.
Encyclopaedia of Islam. New edition. 12 vols. Brill, Leiden, 1960-2004.
Guesmi: Chedli Guesmi, El Kit×b al-amÐ×r wa’l-asþ×r de Abý þAbd All×h al-
Baqq×r. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Barcelona, 2005.
Hartner: Willy Hartner, Article “Al-Batt×n÷, Abý þAbd All×h Mu¬ammad
...”. In Charles C. Gillispie (ed.), Dictionary of Scientific Biography.
Scribners, New York, 1970, vol. I, 507-516.
Ibn Ab÷ l-Rij×l: Aly Aben Ragel, El Libro Conplido en los Iudizios de las
Estrellas. Partes 6 a 8. Introduction and edition by Gerold Hilty. Instituto
de Estudios Islámicos y del Oriente Próximo & Grupo “Millás-Vallicrosa”
de Historia de la Ciencia Árabe-Universidad de Barcelona. Zaragoza,
2005.
de Jong & de Goeje: Pieter de Jong & Michael Jan de Goeje, Catalogus
Codicum Orientalium Bibliothecae Academiae Lugduno Bataviae. Volu-
men Tertium. Brill, Leiden, 1865.
Kennedy: Edward S. Kennedy, “Ramifications of the World-Year Concept
in Islamic Astronomy”. In Henry Guerlac (ed.), Ithaca. Actes du Dixième
Congrès International d’Histoire des Sciences, 26 VIII 1962 - 2 IX 1962.
Hermann, Paris, vol. 1, 23-43. Reprint in SIES, 351-371.
Kennedy, Colleagues and Former Students: see SIES.
Kennedy & Pingree: Edward S. Kennedy and David Pingree, The Astro-
logical History of M×sh×’all×h. Harvard University Press, Cambridge,
Mass., 1971.
Al-Battānī’s Astrological History—Commentary 147