Scribd
Upload
1 views

CapgeminiRealTimeInterview

Uploaded by

tellapuri.naresh
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as TXT, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
1 views

CapgeminiRealTimeInterview

Uploaded by

tellapuri.naresh
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as TXT, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 4

If you use a custom object in a `HashMap` and override its `hashCode()` method to

always return `100`, it will have significant performance implications for the
`HashMap`. Here’s what happens:

---

### **Impact of Always Returning the Same Hash Code**


1. **All Objects Fall into the Same Bucket**:
- `HashMap` organizes entries into buckets based on the hash code of the key.
- If all objects return `100` for `hashCode()`, they all will be placed in the
same bucket.

2. **Collisions Increase**:
- A hash collision occurs when multiple keys map to the same bucket.
- In this case, every key will map to the bucket corresponding to hash code
`100`.

3. **Degraded Performance**:
- When retrieving or storing an entry, the `HashMap` first identifies the bucket
using the hash code.
- If all entries are in one bucket, the `HashMap` must iterate through all
entries in that bucket to find the correct one.
- **Time Complexity**:
- Ideal: `O(1)` (when the hash codes are well-distributed).
- Worst Case: `O(n)` (if all entries fall into one bucket, which happens
here).

4. **Memory and Lookup Inefficiency**:


- The primary purpose of using `HashMap` is its efficient key-based retrieval.
- By always returning the same hash code, you're negating the benefits of
hashing, making the `HashMap` behave like a **linked list** for that bucket.

---

### **Example Scenario**


```java
import java.util.HashMap;

class CustomKey {
private String value;

public CustomKey(String value) {


this.value = value;
}

@Override
public int hashCode() {
return 100; // Same hash code for all keys
}

@Override
public boolean equals(Object obj) {
if (this == obj) return true;
if (obj == null || getClass() != obj.getClass()) return false;
CustomKey that = (CustomKey) obj;
return value.equals(that.value);
}
}
public class Main {
public static void main(String[] args) {
HashMap<CustomKey, String> map = new HashMap<>();
map.put(new CustomKey("key1"), "value1");
map.put(new CustomKey("key2"), "value2");
map.put(new CustomKey("key3"), "value3");

System.out.println("Size of map: " + map.size()); // Output: 3


System.out.println("Retrieve key2: " + map.get(new CustomKey("key2"))); //
Output: "value2"
}
}
```

---

### **Key Observations**:


1. **Insertion**:
- All entries go into the same bucket because their hash codes are identical.
- The `HashMap` must iterate over the bucket's list to check for duplicate keys.

2. **Retrieval**:
- For every retrieval, the `equals()` method is called for every object in the
bucket until a match is found.

---

### **Best Practices**


1. **Use a Properly Defined `hashCode()`**:
- The `hashCode()` method should distribute keys uniformly across buckets to
minimize collisions.
- Include fields of the custom object in the hash calculation.

Example:
```java
@Override
public int hashCode() {
return Objects.hash(value); // Generate hash code based on fields
}
```

2. **Maintain `hashCode()` and `equals()` Contract**:


- Ensure that if two objects are equal according to `equals()`, their
`hashCode()` values must also be the same.

---

By ensuring a well-implemented `hashCode()` method, you preserve the efficiency and


performance of the `HashMap`. Always returning a constant value like `100` defeats
the purpose of hashing.
==========================================
If you don't override the `hashCode()` method in a custom object and use it as a
key in a `HashMap`, the default implementation provided by the `Object` class will
be used. Here's the impact of this decision:

---

### **Default `hashCode()` Behavior**


The `Object` class's `hashCode()` implementation typically returns a value derived
from the memory address of the object. As a result:
- Each instance of the custom class will have a unique hash code (unless the JVM
optimizes memory addresses).

---

### **Implications of Not Overriding `hashCode()`**

#### **1. Unique Hash Codes for Every Object**


- Since the default `hashCode()` implementation generates unique hash codes for
objects, even two logically equal objects (based on their field values) will have
different hash codes unless they're the same object reference.

Example:
```java
class CustomKey {
private String value;

public CustomKey(String value) {


this.value = value;
}
}

public class Main {


public static void main(String[] args) {
HashMap<CustomKey, String> map = new HashMap<>();
CustomKey key1 = new CustomKey("key");
CustomKey key2 = new CustomKey("key");

map.put(key1, "value1");

// Retrieve using logically equal key


System.out.println(map.get(key2)); // Output: null
}
}
```
- Even though `key1` and `key2` logically represent the same value, their hash
codes will be different because `hashCode()` is not overridden.

---

#### **2. Breaks `HashMap` Contract**


- The `HashMap` relies on the **`hashCode()` and `equals()` contract**:
- If two objects are equal according to the `equals()` method, they must have
the same `hashCode()`.
- Not overriding `hashCode()` can lead to incorrect behavior in a `HashMap` if
`equals()` is overridden to compare field values.

---

#### **3. Unexpected Retrieval Failures**


- When you store an object in a `HashMap` and try to retrieve it using another
logically equivalent object, retrieval will fail because the hash code of the
second object does not match the hash code of the first.

---

### **When You Must Override `hashCode()`**


You must override `hashCode()` whenever:
1. You plan to use the object as a key in a `HashMap`, `HashSet`, or any other
hash-based collection.
2. You override the `equals()` method to compare object values instead of object
references.

---

### **Proper Implementation of `hashCode()`**


1. Use all relevant fields of the class to generate a consistent and unique hash
code.
2. You can use `Objects.hash()` or implement your logic manually.

Example:
```java
class CustomKey {
private String value;

public CustomKey(String value) {


this.value = value;
}

@Override
public boolean equals(Object obj) {
if (this == obj) return true;
if (obj == null || getClass() != obj.getClass()) return false;
CustomKey that = (CustomKey) obj;
return value.equals(that.value);
}

@Override
public int hashCode() {
return Objects.hash(value); // Generate hash code using fields
}
}

public class Main {


public static void main(String[] args) {
HashMap<CustomKey, String> map = new HashMap<>();
CustomKey key1 = new CustomKey("key");
CustomKey key2 = new CustomKey("key");

map.put(key1, "value1");
System.out.println(map.get(key2)); // Output: value1
}
}
```

---

### **Conclusion**
If you don’t override `hashCode()`:
- The `HashMap` may behave incorrectly, especially if you override `equals()`.
- Objects that are logically equal will not work as expected when used as keys in a
hash-based collection.
To ensure correctness and maintain the `HashMap` contract, always override
`hashCode()` and `equals()` together.
=========================

You might also like