0% found this document useful (0 votes)
34 views4 pages

05 08 Edge-Connectivity

Edge chromatic number

Uploaded by

Nadeem
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
34 views4 pages

05 08 Edge-Connectivity

Edge chromatic number

Uploaded by

Nadeem
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 4

Math 38 - Graph Theory Nadia Lafrenière

Edge-connectivity 05/08/2020

Last class, we considered connectivity to be the minimum number of


vertices one can remove to get a disconnected graph. Today, we will
look at a similar notion, but this time we are removing edges.

Definition
A disconnecting set is a subset of edges F ⊆ E such that G-F has at
least 2 components. separating ≠ disconnecting
The edge-connectivity is the minimum size of a disconnecting set, and
is noted κ'(G). A graph is k-edge-connected if it has edge-
connectivity at least k.

Examples

Complete graphs have edge-connectivity n-1. You can prove it!

Let S⊆V be a vertex subset of a connected graph G. Let [S,S] be the


set of all edges with one endpoint in S and one in S. Then [S,S] is
an edge cut.

Edge cut Disconnecting set

Edge cut ⇔ Minimal disconnecting set


Connection to vertex-connectivity 2

Theorem (Whitney, 1932)


If G is simple, then κ(G)≤ κ'(G)≤ δ(G). In words: vertex-connectivity
is at most edge-connectivity, which is always at most the smallest
degree.

Example of inequalities

κ(G)<κ'(G)=δ(G) κ(G)=κ'(G)<δ(G) κ(G)<κ'(G)<δ(G)

Proof
We first prove κ'(G)≤ δ(G). Let v be a vertex with degree δ(G).
The edge cut for the set {v} has δ(G) edges, so an edge cut with
δ(G) edges exist, and the minimum edge cut has size at most δ(G).

We also need to prove κ(G)≤ κ'(G). To do so, we start with a


minimum edge cut, and construct a vertex cut with at most the same
size. If this process is always possible, that proves the desired
inequality.

Consider a minimum edge cut [S,V-S]. There are two cases:


- If every vertex of S is connected to every vertex of V-S, then
#[S,V-S]=|S||V-S|≥ |V|-1. Also, we proved last class that κ(G)≤|V|-1.
So κ(G)≤ |V|-1 ≤ #[S,V-S]=κ'(G).
- Otherwise, there is one vertex x in S and y not in S that are not
adjacent. We construct a set of vertices T:

- All neighbors of x in V-S.


- All vertices of S\{x} that are adjacent to vertices in V-S.
3
Then, T is a vertex cut: There is no way to go from x to y without
passing through one edge of T, so G-T is disconnected. We need
to show that T has at most #[S, V-S] vertices.
For each vertex t of T:
- If t is a neighbor of x, then xt is in the
edge cut.
- If t is in S, then t is adjacent to at least
one vertex u in V-S. Then ut is in the edge cut.

No edge is counted twice in this list, because x is not in T.


Since every edge in this list is in the edge cut, then |T|≤ #[S, V-S],
and κ(G)≤ κ'(G).

Proposition
Let G be a connected graph. Then, an edge cut F is minimal if and
only if G-F has exactly two components.

Remark
If we replace minimal by minimum, then the statement becomes
false: G-F can have two components while there are edge cuts with
size smaller than |F|.

With your study group, try to agree on an explanation of why this is


true.
4
Edge connectivity for regular graphs

Theorem
If G is a 3-regular graph, then κ(G)=κ'(G).

Proof
We already know that κ(G)≤ κ'(G), in general. To prove the statement,
we only need to show the reverse inequality (≥), that is, from a
minimum vertex cut, create an edge cut of the same size.
Let S be a minimum vertex cut, and let H and J be two components of
G-S. Since S is minimum, every vertex of it has a neighbor in H and a
neighbor in J. Also a vertex cannot have at least two neighbors in both
H and J since G is 3-regular. For each vertex v in S, delete the edge
from v to the component in which in has only one neighbor (if there is
one neighbor in H, one in J and another one (in S for example),
delete the edge to H)­
.

That process breaks all the paths between H and J, so the deleted
edges form an edge cut. Also, the size of that edge cut is |S|, which
proves the statement.

Are there any other values of r such that any r-regular simple graph G
inevitably has κ(G)=κ'(G)? Discuss it with your study group.

Reference: Douglas B. West. Introduction to graph theory, 2nd edition, 2001.


Section 4.1

You might also like