UAS PRAKTIKUM METODOLOGI PENELITIAN

NAMA : ANDINI HERNANINGTYAS

NIM : 202207005
KELAS : RMIK 4A

PRAK 1. Analisi Deskriptif Kategorik (Frekuensi, Crosstabulation, dan

Uji Kendall’s tau-b) pada Data Tingkat Kecemasan, Tingkat Depresi dan Hasil Belajar

1. VARIABEL VIEW

2. DATA VIEW
3. OUTPUT

FREQUENCIES VARIABLES=TingkatKecemasan TingkatDepresi HasilBelajar

/HISTOGRAM

/ORDER=ANALYSIS.

Frequencies

Notes

Output Created 28-MAY-2024 14:27:21

Comments

Active Dataset DataSet0

Filter <none>
Weight
Input <none>
Split File
<none>
N of Rows in Working
Data
193
File

Definition of Missing User-defined missing

Missing Value values are treated as

Handling missing.
Cases Used
Statistics are based on
allcases with valid
data.

FREQUENCIES
Syntax
VARIABLES=TingkatKe
cemasan TingkatDepresi
HasilBelajar
Processor Time
Resources /HISTOGRAM
Elapsed Time
/ORDER=ANALYSIS.

00:00:01,27

00:00:01,3
6
 Tingk Tingk Hasil
at at Belajar
Kecema Depres
i
s an
Valid 193 193 193
N
Missin 0 0 0
g
Frequency Table

Tingkat Kecemasan

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulati

ve
Percent
Minimal 42 21.8 21.8 21.8
Ringan 98 50.8 50.8 72.5
Valid Sedang 28 14.5 14.5 87.0
Berat 25 13.0 13.0 100.0
Total 193 100.0 100.0

Tingkat Depresi

Frequency Percent Valid Cumulati

Percent v
ePercen
t
Tidak ada gejala 45 23.3 23.3 23.3
Gejala Depresi 65 33.7 33.7 57.0
Ringan
Depresi Ringan 33 17.1 17.1 74.1
Valid
Depresi Sedang 23 11.9 11.9 86.0
Depresi Berat 27 14.0 14.0 100.0
Total 193 100.0 100.0

Hasil Belajar

Frequency Percent Valid Cumulati

Percent v
ePercen
t
Kurang 118 61.1 61.1 61.1
72 37.3 37.3 98.4
Cukup
Valid 3 1.6 1.6 100.0
Baik
193 100.0 100.0
Total
 Hasil Belajar

Histogram
 FREQUENCIES VARIABLES=TingkatKecemasan TingkatDepresi HasilBelajar

/PIECHART FREQ

/ORDER=ANALYSIS.

Frequencies

Notes
Output Created 28-MAY-2024 14:27:40
Comments
Active Dataset DataSet
0
Filter
Weig <none>
Input <none>
ht
<none>
Split File 193
N of Rows in Working
DataFile
User-defined missing
Definition of
Missing valuesare treated as missing.
Missing Value
Handling Statistics are based on
Cases Used
all cases with valid
data.

FREQUENCIES
VARIABLES=TingkatKecema
san
TingkatDepresi HasilBelajar
Syntax
/PIECHART FREQ
/ORDER=ANALYSIS.

Processor Time 00:00:01,11

Resources
Elapsed Time 00:00:01,33
 Tingkat Tingkat Hasil Belajar
Kecemasa Depresi
n
Valid 193 193 193
N
Missing 0 0 0
Frequency Table

Tingkat Kecemasan

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulati

ve
Percent
Minimal 42 21.8 21.8 21.8
Ringan 98 50.8 50.8 72.5
Valid Sedang 28 14.5 14.5 87.0
Berat 25 13.0 13.0 100.0
Total 193 100.0 100.0

Tingkat Depresi

Frequenc Percent Valid Percent Cumulati

y v
ePercen
t
Tidak ada gejala 45 23.3 23.3 23.3
Gejala Depresi Ringan 65 33.7 33.7 57.0
Depresi Ringan 33 17.1 17.1 74.1
Valid
Depresi Sedang 23 11.9 11.9 86.0
Depresi Berat 27 14.0 14.0 100.0
Total 193 100.0 100.0

Hasil Belajar

Frequenc Percent Valid Cumulati

y Percent ve
Percent
Kurang 118 61.1 61.1 61.1
Cukup 72 37.3 37.3 98.4
Valid
Baik 3 1.6 1.6 100.0
Total 193 100.0 100.0
Pie Chart
CROSSTABS

/TABLES=HasilBelajar BY TingkatKecemasan TingkatDepresi

/FORMAT=AVALUE TABLES

/CELLS=COUNT

/COUNT ROUND CELL.

Crosstabs

Notes
Output Created 28-MAY-2024 14:30:45
Comments
Active Dataset DataSet0
Filter <none>
Weight <none>
Input
Split File <none>
N of Rows in Working DataFile
193
User-defined missing valuesare
Definition of Missing
treated as missing.

Statistics for each table are

Missing Value Handling based on all the cases with
Cases Used
valid data in the specified
range(s) for all variables in
each table.

CROSSTABS

/TABLES=HasilBelajar BY
TingkatKecemasan
TingkatDepresi
Syntax
/FORMAT=AVALUE
TABLES

/CELLS=COUNT

/COUNT ROUND CELL.

Processor Time 00:00:00,00
Elapsed Time 00:00:00,06
Resources
Dimensions Requested 2
Cells Available 131072
 Case Processing Summary

Cases

Vali Missin Tota

d g l

N Percent N Percent N Percent

Hasil Belajar *
193 100.0% 0 0.0% 193 100.0%
Tingkat Kecemasan

Hasil Belajar *
193 100.0% 0 0.0% 193 100.0%
Tingkat Depresi

Hasil Belajar * Tingkat Kecemasan Crosstabulation

Tingkat Kecemasan Total

Minimal Ringan Sedang Berat
Kurang 26 47 20 25 118
Hasil Belajar Cukup 16 48 8 0 72
Baik 0 3 0 0 3
Total 42 98 28 25 193

Tingka
t
Depre
si

Tidak ada Gejala Depresi Ringan Depresi

gejala Depres Sedang
i
Ringan
Kurang 22 35 19 15

Hasil Cukup 20 30 14 8
Belajar
Baik 3 0 0 0
Total 45 65 33 23
 Hasil Belajar * Tingkat Depresi Crosstabulation

Tingkat Depresi Tota

Depresi Berat l

Kurang 27 118
Hasil Belajar Cukup 0 72
Baik 0 3
Total 27 193

CROSSTABS

/TABLES=HasilBelajar BY TingkatKecemasan

/FORMAT=AVALUE TABLES

/STATISTICS=BTAU

/CELLS=COUNT

/COUNT ROUND CELL.

Crosstabs

Output Created 12-JUL-2024 08:22:12

Comments
C:\Users\ASUS\Docume
nts\
Data COOLYEAHH\SEMES
TER

Active Dataset 4\METOPEN\Bu

Input
Filter Irma\Data1Prak1,4 Deskriptif

Weight Analitik [Frekuensi dan

Split File Crosstabulation].sav
N of Rows in Working DataFile
DataSet1
<none>
<none>
<none>

193
 User-defined missing
Definition of Missing
valuesaretreated as missing.

Missing Value Statistics for each table

Handling arebasedon all the cases
Cases Used
withvalid data in the specified
range(s) for all variables in
each table.

CROSSTABS

/TABLES=HasilBelaja
r BYTingkatKecemasan
Syntax
/FORMAT=AVALUETABLES

/STATISTICS=BTAU

/CELLS=COUNT
Processor Time
Elapsed Time /COUNT ROUND CELL.
Resources
Dimensions Requested 00:00:00,02

Cells Available 00:00:00,02

2
131072

Case Processing Summary

Cases

Vali Missing Tota

d l

N Percent N Percent N Percent

Hasil Belajar *
193 100.0 0 0.0 193 100.0
Tingkat Kecemasan % % %
 Hasil Belajar * Tingkat Kecemasan Crosstabulation

Tingkat Kecemasan Total

Minima Ringan Sedang Berat

l
Kurang 26 47 20 25 118

Hasil Belajar Cukup 16 48 8 0 72

Baik 0 3 0 0 3

Total 42 98 28 25 193

Symmetric Measures

Value Asymp. Approx. Approx.

Std. Tb Sig.
Errora
Ordinal by Ordinal Kendall's tau-b -.193 .059 - .001
3.219
N of Valid Cases 193

a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

NONPAR CORR

/VARIABLES=TingkatKecemasan HasilBelajar

/PRINT=KENDALL TWOTAIL NOSIG

/MISSING=PAIRWISE.

Nonparametric Correlations

Notes

Output Created 12-JUL-2024 08:24:19

Comments
 C:\Users\ASUS\Docume
nts\
COOLYEAHH\SEMES
Data
TER
4\METOPEN\Bu

Active Dataset Irma\Data1 Prak1,4

Input
Deskriptif Analitik
Filter
[Frekuensi dan
Weight Crosstabulation].sav
Split File
DataSet1
N of Rows in Working
Data <none>
File <none>

<none>
Definition of Missing

Missing Value 193

Handling
Cases Used
User-defined missing
values are treated as
missing.

Statistics for each pair of

variables are based on all
Syntax the cases with valid data
for that pair.

NONPAR CORR

Processor Time
/VARIABLES=TingkatKe
Resources Elapsed Time cemasan HasilBelajar
Number of Cases Allowed
/PRINT=KEND
ALLTWOTAIL
NOSIG

/MISSING=PAIRWISE.

00:00:00,00

00:00:00,00

157286 casesa
 Correlations

Tingkat Hasil Belajar

Kecemasa
n
Correlation 1.000 -.193**
Tingkat Kecemasan . .004
Coefficient Sig. (2-
193 193
Kendall's tau_b tailed)
-.193** 1.000
N
.004 .
Hasil Belajar
Correlation
193 193
Coefficient Sig. (2-

tailed)

**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).

PRAK 2. Analisis Deskriptif Numerik pada Data Berat Badan Bayi Lahir

1. VARIABELVIEW

2. DATA VIEW
 3. OUTPUT
FREQUENCIES VARIABLES=beratbadanbayilahir
/NTILES=4
/STATISTICS=MINIMUM MAXIMUM MEAN MEDIAN MODE
/ORDER=ANALYSIS.

Frequencies

Notes

Output Created 03-JUN-2024 13:52:51

Comments
Input Active Dataset DataSet0
Filter <none>
Weight <none>
Split File <none>
N of Rows in Working 27
Data File
Missing Value Definition of Missing User-defined
Handling missing values are
treated asmissing.
Cases Used Statistics are based on
allcases with valid
data.
Syntax FREQUENCIES
VARIABLES=beratbad
anb ayilahir
/NTILES=4
/STATISTICS=MINI
MUM MAXIMUM
MEAN MEDIAN
MODE
/ORDER=ANALYSIS.
Resources Processor Time 00:00:00.00
Elapsed Time 00:00:00.02
 Statistics
beratbadanbayilahir

N Valid 27
Missing 0
Mean 2477.78
Median 2500.00
Mode 2600
Minimum 2100
Maximum 2800
Percentiles 25 2300.00
50 2500.00
75 2600.00

beratbadanbayilahir

Cumulati
Frequency Percent Valid Percent ve
Percent
Valid 2100 1 3.7 3.7 3.7
2200 2 7.4 7.4 11.1
2300 4 14.8 14.8 25.9
2400 4 14.8 14.8 40.7
2500 4 14.8 14.8 55.6
2550 2 7.4 7.4 63.0
2600 6 22.2 22.2 85.2
2700 3 11.1 11.1 96.3
2800 1 3.7 3.7 100.0
Total 27 100.0 100.0

FREQUENCIES VARIABLES=beratbadanbayilahir
/NTILES=4
/PERCENTILES=25.0 50.0 75.0
/STATISTICS=STDDEV VARIANCE RANGE SKEWNESS SESKEW KURTOSIS SEKURT
/HISTOGRAM NORMAL
/ORDER=ANALYSIS.

Frequencies
 Notes

Output Created 03-JUN-2024 13:56:08

Comments
Input Active Dataset DataSet0
Filter <none>
Weight <none>
Split File <none>
N of Rows in Working 27
Data File
Missing Value Definition of Missing User-defined
Handling missing values are
treated asmissing.
Cases Used Statistics are based on
allcases with valid
data.
Syntax FREQUENCIES
VARIABLES=beratbad
anb ayilahir
/NTILES=4
/PERCENTILES=2
5.0 50.0 75.0
/STATISTICS=STDDE
VVARIANCE RANGE
SKEWNESS SESKEW
KURTOSIS SEKURT
/HISTOGRAM
NORMAL
/ORDER=ANALYSIS.
Resources Processor Time 00:00:01.53
Elapsed Time 00:00:02.84
 Statistics
beratbadanbayilahir

N Valid 27
Missing 0
Std. Deviation 175.594
Variance 30833.333
Skewness -.330
Std. Error of Skewness .448
Kurtosis -.530
Std. Error of Kurtosis .872
Range 700
Percentiles 25 2300.00
50 2500.00
75 2600.00

beratbadanbayilahir

Cumulati
Frequency Percent Valid Percent ve
Percent
Valid 2100 1 3.7 3.7 3.7
2200 2 7.4 7.4 11.1
2300 4 14.8 14.8 25.9
2400 4 14.8 14.8 40.7
2500 4 14.8 14.8 55.6
2550 2 7.4 7.4 63.0
2600 6 22.2 22.2 85.2
2700 3 11.1 11.1 96.3
2800 1 3.7 3.7 100.0
Total 27 100.0 100.0
 Histogram

8 Mean = 2477.78
Std. Dev. = 175.594
N = 27

6
Frequency

0
20
00 2200 2400 2600 2800 3000
beratbadanbayilahir
PRAK 3. Uji Chi Square pada Data Status Klaim dan Kelengkapan RM

1. VARIABLE VIEW

2. DATA VIEW
3. OUTPUT
CROSSTABS
/TABLES=NameX BY VariasiY
/FORMAT=AVALUE TABLES
/STATISTICS=CHISQ
/CELLS=COUNT
/COUNT ROUND CELL.

Crosstabs

Notes

Output Created 04-JUN-2024 14:46:46

Comments
Input Active Dataset DataSet0
Filter <none>
Weight <none>
Split File <none>
N of Rows in Working 111
Data File
Missing Value Definition of Missing User-defined
Handling missing values are
treated asmissing.
Cases Used Statistics for each table
are based on all the
cases with valid data in
the specified range(s)
for all variables in each
table.
Syntax CROSSTABS
/TABLES=NameX BY
VariasiY
/FORMAT=AVA
LUE TABLES
/STATISTICS=CHISQ
/CELLS=COUNT
/COUNT ROUND
CELL.
Resources Processor Time 00:00:00.02
Elapsed Time 00:00:00.13
Dimensions Requested 2
Cells Available 524245
 Case Processing Summary

Cases
Valid Missing Tota
l
N Percent N Percent N Percent
Kelengkapan RM * 111 100.0% 0 0.0% 111 100.0%
Pending Klaim

Kelengkapan RM * Pending Klaim Crosstabulation

Count
Pending Klaim
Ya Tidak Total
Kelengkapan RM Lengkap 53 11 64
Tidak Lengkap 10 37 47
Total 63 48 111

Chi-Square Tests

Asymptotic
Significance Exact Sig. Exact Sig.
Value df (2-sided) (2-sided) (1-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 1 .000
41.810a
39.340 1 .000
Continuity Correctionb
Likelihood Ratio 44.459 1 .000
Fisher's Exact Test .000 .000
Linear-by- 41.433 1 .000
Linear
Association
N of Valid Cases 111
a. 0 cells (0.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 20.32.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
CROSSTABS
/TABLES=NameX BY VariasiY
/FORMAT=AVALUE TABLES
/STATISTICS=CHISQ BTAU
/CELLS=COUNT
/COUNT ROUND CELL.
 Notes

Output Created 04-JUN-2024 14:58:21

Comments
Input Active Dataset DataSet0
Filter <none>
Weight <none>
Split File <none>
N of Rows in Working 111
Data File
Missing Value Definition of Missing User-defined
Handling missing values are
treated asmissing.
Cases Used Statistics for each table
are based on all the
cases with valid data in
the specified range(s)
for all variables in each
table.
Syntax CROSSTABS
/TABLES=NameX BY
VariasiY
/FORMAT=AVA
LUE TABLES
/STATISTICS=CH
ISQBTAU
/CELLS=COUNT
/COUNT ROUND
CELL.
Resources Processor Time 00:00:00.02
Elapsed Time 00:00:00.02
Dimensions Requested 2
Cells Available 524245

Case Processing Summary

Cases
Valid Missing Tota
l
N Percent N Percent N Percent
Kelengkapan RM * 111 100.0% 0 0.0% 111 100.0%
Pending Klaim
 Kelengkapan RM * Pending Klaim Crosstabulation
Count

Pending Klaim
Ya Tidak Total
Kelengkapan RM Lengkap 53 11 64
Tidak Lengkap 10 37 47
Total 63 48 111

Chi-Square Tests

Asymptotic
Significance Exact Sig. Exact Sig.
Value df (2-sided) (2-sided) (1-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 1 .000
41.810a
39.340 1 .000
Continuity Correctionb
Likelihood Ratio 44.459 1 .000
Fisher's Exact Test .000 .000
Linear-by- 41.433 1 .000
Linear
Association
N of Valid Cases 111
a. 0 cells (0.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 20.32.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Symmetric Measures

Asymptotic
Standard Approxima
Approximate
Value Errora te
Tb Significan
ce
Ordinal by Ordinal Kendall's tau-b .614 .076 7.869 .000
N of Valid Cases 111
a. Not assuming the null hypothesis.
b. Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.
 NONPAR CORR
/VARIABLES=NameX VariasiY
/PRINT=KENDALL TWOTAIL NOSIG FULL
/MISSING=PAIRWISE.

Nonparametric Correlations
Notes

Output Created 04-JUN-2024 15:00:01

Comments
Input Active Dataset DataSet0
Filter <none>
Weight <none>
Split File <none>
N of Rows in Working 111
Data File
Missing Value Definition of Missing User-defined
Handling missing values are
treated asmissing.
Cases Used Statistics for each pair
of variables are based
on all the cases with
valid data for that pair.
Syntax NONPAR CORR
/VARIABLES=NameX
VariasiY
/PRINT=KENDAL
L TWOTAIL NOSIG
FULL
/MISSING=PAIRWISE.
Resources Processor Time 00:00:00.00
Elapsed Time 00:00:00.00
Number of Cases
629145 casesa
Allowed
a. Based on availability of workspace memory
 Correlations

Kelengkapa
n RM Pending
Klaim
Kendall's tau_b Kelengkapan RM Correlation 1.000
.614**
Coefficient
Sig. (2-tailed) . .000
N 111 111
Pending Klaim Correlation 1.000
.614**
Coefficient
Sig. (2-tailed) .000 .
N 111 111
**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).
PRAK 4. Analisis Multivariat Regresi Logistic Biner pada Data Pemberian ASI Eksklusif

1. VARIABLE VIEW

2. DATA VIEW
3. OUTPUT

LOGISTICREGRESSIONVARIABLESY
/METHOD=ENTER X1 X2
/CONTRAST(X1)=Indicator
/CLASSPLOT
/CASEWISE
/PRINT=GOODFIT
/CRITERIA=PIN(0.05) POUT(0.10) ITERATE(20) CUT(0.5).

Logistic Regression
Notes

Output Created 11-JUN-2024 14:04:09

Comments
Input Active Dataset DataSet0
Filter <none>
Weight <none>
Split File <none>
N of Rows in Working 40
Data File
Missing Value Handling Definition of Missing User-defined
missing values are
treated asmissing
Syntax LOGISTIC
REGRESSION
VARIABLES Y
/METHOD=ENTER
X1 X2
/CONTRAST (X1)
=Indicator
/CLASSPLOT
/CASEWISE
/PRINT=GOODFIT
/CRITERIA=PIN(0.05)
POUT(0.10)
ITERATE(20) ...
Resources Processor Time 00:00:00.02
Elapsed Time 00:00:00.02
 Case Processing Summary

Unweighted Casesa N Percent

Selected Cases Included in 40 100.0
Analysis
Missing Cases 0 .0
Total 40 100.0
Unselected Cases 0 .0
Total 40 100.0
a. If weight is in effect, see classification table for the total number of cases.

Dependent Variable Encoding

Original Value Internal Value

tidak diberi atau bukan 0
ASIeksklusif
jika diberikan ASI 1
eklusif

Categorical Variables Codings

Paramete
r coding
Frequency (1)
Status Pekerjaan tidak bekerja 21 1.000
jika bekerja 19 .000

Block 0: Beginning Block

a,b
Classification Table

Predicted
ASI Eksklusif
tidak diberi
atau
bukan jika Percentag
Observed ASI diberikan e
eksklusi ASI Correct
f eklusif
Step 0 ASI tidak diberi atau bukan 0 15 .0
Eksklusif ASIeksklusif
jika diberikan ASI 0 25 100.0
eklusif
Overall ge 62.5
Percenta
a. Constant is included in the model.

b. The cut value is .500

 Variables in the Equation

B S.E. Wald df Sig. Exp(B)

Step 0 Constant .511 .327 2.446 1 .118 1.667

Variables not in the Equation

Score df Sig.
Step 0 Variables Status Pekerjaan(1) 14.764 1 .000
Pengetahuan Ibu 14.000 1 .000
Overall Statistics 18.335 2 .000

Block 1: Method = Enter

Omnibus Tests of Model Coefficients

Chi-square df Sig.
Step 1 Step 20.952 2 .000
Block 20.952 2 .000
Model 20.952 2 .000

Model Summary

-2 Log Cox & Snell Nagelkerke

Step likelihood RSquare RSquare
1 .408 .556
31.973a
a. Estimation terminated at iteration number 5 because parameter estimates changed by less than .001.

Hosmer and Lemeshow Test

Step Chi-square df Sig.

1 10.812 6 .094
 Contingency Table for Hosmer and Lemeshow Test

ASI Eksklusif = tidak diberi ASI Eksklusif = jika diberikan

atau bukan ASI ASIeklusif
eksklusif Total
Observed Expected Observed Expected
Step 1 1 3 4.516 2 .484 5
2 6 4.777 0 1.223 6
3 3 1.861 0 1.139 3
4 1 1.624 3 2.376 4
5 1 .534 1 1.466 2
6 0 .795 5 4.205 5
7 1 .733 9 9.267 10
8 0 .160 5 4.840 5

a
Classification Table

Predicted
ASI Eksklusif
tidak diberi
atau
bukan jika Percentag
Observed ASI diberikan e
eksklusi ASI Correct
f eklusif
Step 1 ASI tidak diberi atau bukan 12 3 80.0
Eksklusif ASIeksklusif
jika diberikan ASI 2 23 92.0
eklusif
Overall ge 87.5
Percenta
a. The cut value is .500
 Variables in the Equation

B S.E. Wald df Sig. Exp(B)

Status Pekerjaan(1) 2.156 .979 4.846 1 .028 8.636
Step 1a
Pengetahuan Ibu .872 .428 4.144 1 .042 2.391
Constant -3.106 1.335 5.416 1 .020 .045
a. Variable(s) entered on step 1: Status Pekerjaan, Pengetahuan Ibu.

Step number: 1

Observed Groups and Predicted Probabilities

 16 +
+
I
I
I
I
F I
I
R 12 +
+
E I
I
Q I
j I
U I
j I
E 8 +
j +
N I
j I
C I t
j I
Y I j t
j j j I
4 + j t j
j j j +
I t t t j
j j j I
I t t t j
j j j I
I t t t t
t j j t j I
Predicted ---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+---------+--------
-+---------+---------+----------

Prob: 0 .1 .2 .3 .4 .5 .6
.7 .8 .9 1
Group: ttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjj

Predicted Probability is of Membership for jika diberikan ASI eklusi

f
 The Cut Value is .50
Symbols: t - tidak diberi atau bukan ASI eksklusifj - jika diberikan ASI
eklusif
Each Symbol Represents 1 Case.

Casewise List

Selected Observed Temporary Variable

Predicte
Statusa ASI Predicted d Resid ZResid SResid
Case Eksklusif Group
1 S t .097 t -.097 -.327 -.470
2 S t .097 t -.097 -.327 -.470
3 S t .204 t -.204 -.506 -.700
4 S t .204 t -.204 -.506 -.700
5 S t .204 t -.204 -.506 -.700
6 S t .204 t -.204 -.506 -.700
7 S t .380 t -.380 -.782 -1.015
8 S j .778 j .222 .535 .793
9 S t .204 t -.204 -.506 -.700
10 S t .204 t -.204 -.506 -.700
11 S t .097 t -.097 -.327 -.470
12 S j .594 j .406 .827 1.097
13 S j** .097 t .903 3.056 2.254
14 S t .380 t -.380 -.782 -1.015
15 S j .594 j .406 .827 1.097
16 S j .968 j .032 .182 .259
17 S j .841 j .159 .435 .615
18 S j .927 j .073 .281 .399
19 S j .968 j .032 .182 .259
20 S j .841 j .159 .435 .615
21 S j .927 j .073 .281 .399
22 S j .927 j .073 .281 .399
23 S j .841 j .159 .435 .615
24 S j .927 j .073 .281 .399
25 S j .968 j .032 .182 .259
26 S j .841 j .159 .435 .615
27 S j .927 j .073 .281 .399
28 S t** .689 j -.689 -1.487 -1.716
29 S j .927 j .073 .281 .399
 Casewise
List

Selected Observed Temporary Variable

Predicte
Statusa ASI Predicted d Resid ZResid SResid
Case Eksklusif Group
30 S j .927 j .073 .281 .399
31 S t** .594 j -.594 -1.210 -1.443
32 S j** .097 t .903 3.056 2.254
33 S t .380 t -.380 -.782 -1.015
34 S j .594 j .406 .827 1.097
35 S j .968 j .032 .182 .259
36 S j .841 j .159 .435 .615
37 S j .927 j .073 .281 .399
38 S j .968 j .032 .182 .259
39 S t** .927 j -.927 -3.555 -2.337
40 S j .927 j .073 .281 .399
a. S = Selected, U = Unselected cases, and ** = Misclassified cases.
PRAK 5. Uji Manova pada Data Tiga Metode Belajar dengan Nilai Matematika dan B.Inggris

1. VARIABEL VIEW

2. DATA VIEW
3. OUTPUT
Your temporary usage period for IBM SPSS Statistics will expire in 4220 days.

GLM Matematika Bahasa_Inggris BY Metode

/METHOD=SSTYPE(3)
/INTERCEPT=INCLUDE
/POSTHOC=Metode(LSD BONFERRONI)
/EMMEANS=TABLES(OVERALL)
/EMMEANS=TABLES(Metode) COMPARE ADJ(BONFERRONI)
/PRINT=DESCRIPTIVE HOMOGENEITY
/CRITERIA=ALPHA(.05)
/DESIGN= Metode.

General Linear Model

Notes

Output Created 11-JUN-2024 14:55:33

Comments
Input Active Dataset DataSet0
Filter <none>
Weight <none>
Split File <none>
N of Rows in Working 36
Data File
Missing Value Definition of Missing User-defined missing
Handling values are treated as
missing.
Cases Used Statistics are based on all
cases with valid data for
all variables in the model.
Note
Syntax GLM Matematika
Bahasa_Inggris BY
Metode
/METHOD=SSTYPE(3)
/INTERCEPT=INCLUD
E
/POSTHOC=Metode
(LSD BONFERRONI)
/EMMEANS=TABLES
(OVERALL)
/EMMEANS=TABLES
(Metode) COMPARE
ADJ (BONFERRONI)
/PRINT=DESCRIPTIVE
HOMOGENEITY
/CRITERIA=ALPHA(.05
)
/DESIGN= Metode.
Resources Processor Time 00:00:00.00
Elapsed Time 00:00:00.02

Between-Subjects Factors
Value Label N
Metode Mengajar 1.00 Metode A 12
2.00 Metode B 12
3.00 Metode C 12

Descriptive Statistics
Metode Mengajar Mean Std. Deviation N
Nilai Matematika Metode A 62.5000 1.78377 12
Metode B 62.5833 1.67649 12
Metode C 62.5000 1.78377 12
Total 62.5278 1.69851 36
Nilai Bahasa Inggris Metode A 62.5833 1.67649 12
Metode B 64.4167 1.92865 12
Metode C 69.5000 1.78377 12
Total 65.5000 3.44342 36
Box's Test of Equality of Covariance Matricesa

Box's M
8.321
F
2.500
3 df1
df2
87120.000
.058Sig.
Tests the null hypothesis that the observed covariance matrices of the dependent variables are equal across
groups.
a. Design: Intercept + Metode

Multivariate Testsa

Effect Value F Hypothesis df Error df Sig.

Intercept Pillai's Trace .999 23139.304b 2.000 32.000 .000
Wilks' Lambda .001 23139.304b 2.000 32.000 .000
Hotelling's Trace 1446.207 23139.304b 2.000 32.000 .000
Roy's Largest Root 1446.207 23139.304b 2.000 32.000 .000
Metode Pillai's Trace .986 16.043 4.000 66.000 .000
Wilks' Lambda .015 116.737b 4.000 64.000 .000
Hotelling's Trace 67.790 525.374 4.000 62.000 .000
Roy's Largest Root 67.790 1118.530c 2.000 33.000 .000
a. Design: Intercept + Metode
b. Exact statistic
c. The statistic is an upper bound on F that yields a lower bound on the significan
 Levene Statistic df1 df2 Sig.
Nilai Matematika Based on Mean .040 2 33 .961
Based on Median .040 2 33 .961
Based on Median and .040 2 32.853 .961
with adjusted df
Based on trimmed mean .040 2 33 .961
Nilai Bahasa Inggris Based on Mean .107 2 33 .899
Based on Median .106 2 33 .899
Based on Median and .106 2 31.777 .899
with adjusted df
Based on trimmed mean .107 2 33 .899
Tests the null hypothesis that the error variance of the dependent variable is equal across groups.
a. Design: Intercept + Metode

Tests of Between-Subjects Effects

Type III Sum of

Source Dependent Variable Squares df Mean Square F
Corrected Model Nilai Matematika .056a 2 .028 .009
Nilai Bahasa Inggris 308.167b 2 154.083 47.595
Intercept Nilai Matematika 140750.028 1 140750.028 46025.608
Nilai Bahasa Inggris 154449.000 1 154449.000 47708.115
Metode Nilai Matematika .056 2 .028 .009
Nilai Bahasa Inggris 308.167 2 154.083 47.595
Error Nilai Matematika 100.917 33 3.058
Nilai Bahasa Inggris 106.833 33 3.237
Total Nilai Matematika 140851.000 36
Nilai Bahasa Inggris 154864.000 36
Corrected Total Nilai Matematika 100.972 35
Nilai Bahasa Inggris 415.000 35
 Source Dependent Variable Sig.
Corrected Model Nilai Matematika .991
Nilai Bahasa Inggris .000
Intercept Nilai Matematika .000
Nilai Bahasa Inggris .000
Metode Nilai Matematika .991
Nilai Bahasa Inggris .000
Error Nilai Matematika
Nilai Bahasa Inggris
Total Nilai Matematika
Nilai Bahasa Inggris
Corrected Total Nilai Matematika
Nilai Bahasa Inggris
a. R Squared = .001 (Adjusted R Squared = -.060)
b. R Squared = .743 (Adjusted R Squared = .727)
Estimated Marginal Means
1. Grand Mean

95% Confidence Interval

Dependent Variable Mean Std. Error Lower Bound Upper Bound
Nilai Matematika 62.528 .291 61.935 63.121
Nilai Bahasa Inggris 65.500 .300 64.890 66.110

2. Metode Mengajar
Estimates

95% Confidence Interval

Dependent Variable Metode Mengajar Std. Error Lower Bound Upper Bound
Mean
Nilai Matematika Metode A 62.500 .505 61.473 63.527
Metode B 62.583 .505 61.556 63.610
Metode C 62.500 .505 61.473 63.527
Nilai Bahasa Inggris Metode A 62.583 .519 61.527 63.640
Metode B 64.417 .519 63.360 65.473
Metode C 69.500 .519 68.443 70.557
 Pairwise
Mean Dependent Variable (I) Metode Mengajar (J) Metode Mengajar Compariso
Difference (I-J) Std. Error ns

Nilai Matematika Metode A Metode B -.083 .714

Metode C 1.894E-14 .714
Metode B Metode A .083 .714
Metode C .083 .714
Metode C Metode A -1.894E-14 .714
Metode B -.083 .714
Nilai Bahasa Inggris Metode A Metode B -1.833 .735
Metode C -6.917* .735
Metode B Metode A 1.833 .735
Metode C -5.083* .735
Metode C Metode A 6.917* .735
Metode B 5.083* .735
95%
Confidence
b...
Dependent Variable (I) Metode (J) Metode Sig.b Lower Bound
Mengajar Mengajar
Nilai Matematika Metode A Metode B 1.000 -1.884
Metode C 1.000 -1.801
Metode B Metode A 1.000 -1.717
Metode C 1.000 -1.717
Metode C Metode A 1.000 -1.801
Metode B 1.000 -1.884
Nilai Bahasa Inggris Metode A Metode B .053 -3.686
Metode C .000 -8.769
Metode B Metode A .053 -.019
Metode C .000 -6.936
Metode C Metode A .000 5.064
Metode B .000 3.231
95% Confidence Interval for b...

Dependent Variable (I) Metode Mengajar (J) Metode Upper Bound

Mengajar
Nilai Matematika Metode A Metode B 1.717
Metode C 1.801
Metode B Metode A 1.884
Metode C 1.884
Metode C Metode A 1.801
Metode B 1.717
Nilai Bahasa Inggris Metode A Metode B .019
Metode C -5.064
Metode B Metode A 3.686
Metode C -3.231
Metode C Metode A 8.769
Metode B 6.936
Based on estimated marginal means
*. The mean difference is significant at the .05 level.
b. Adjustment for multiple comparisons: Bonferroni.
Multivariate Tests

Value F Hypothesis df Error df Sig.

Pillai's trace .986 16.043 4.000 66.000 .000
Wilks' lambda .015 116.737a 4.000 64.000 .000
Hotelling's trace 67.790 525.374 4.000 62.000 .000
Roy's largest root 67.790 1118.530b 2.000 33.000 .000
Each F tests the multivariate effect of Metode Mengajar. These tests are based on the linearly independent
pairwise comparisons among the estimated marginal means.
a. Exact statistic
b. The statistic is an upper bound on F that yields a lower bound on the significance level.
 Sum of
Dependent Variable Squares df Mean Square F Sig.
Nilai Matematika Contrast .056 2 .028 .009 .991
Error 100.917 33 3.058
Nilai Bahasa Inggris Contrast 308.167 2 154.083 47.595 .000
Error 106.833 33 3.237
The F tests the effect of Metode Mengajar. This test is based on the linearly independent pairwise
comparisons among the estimated marginal means.

Post Hoc Tests Metode Mengajar

Multiple Comparisons

Mean Dependent Variable (I) Metode Mengajar (J) Metode Mengajar Difference
(I-J)
Nilai Matematika LSD Metode A Metode B -.0833
Metode C .0000
Metode B Metode A .0833
Metode C .0833
Metode C Metode A .0000
Metode B -.0833
Bonferroni Metode A Metode B -.0833
Metode C .0000
Metode B Metode A .0833
Metode C .0833
Metode C Metode A .0000
Metode B -.0833
Nilai Bahasa Inggris LSD Metode A Metode B -1.8333*
Metode C -6.9167*
Metode B Metode A 1.8333*
Metode C -5.0833*
Metode C Metode A 6.9167*
Metode B 5.0833*
Bonferroni Metode A Metode B -1.8333
Metode C -6.9167*
Dependent Variable (I) Metode Mengajar (J) Metode Mengajar Std. Error Sig.
Nilai Matematika LSD Metode A Metode B .71392 .908
Metode C .71392 1.000
Metode B Metode A .71392 .908
Metode C .71392 .908
Metode C Metode A .71392 1.000
Metode B .71392 .908
Bonferroni Metode A Metode B .71392 1.000
Metode C .71392 1.000
Metode B Metode A .71392 1.000
Metode C .71392 1.000
Metode C Metode A .71392 1.000
Metode B .71392 1.000
Nilai Bahasa Inggris LSD Metode A Metode B .73455 .018
Metode C .73455 .000
Metode B Metode A .73455 .018
Metode C .73455 .000
Metode C Metode A .73455 .000
Metode B .73455 .000
Bonferroni Metode A Metode B .73455 .053
Metode C .73455 .000
 95% ...
Dependent Variable (I) Metode (J) Metode Lower Bound
Mengajar Mengajar
Nilai Matematika LSD Metode A Metode B -1.5358
Metode C -1.4525
Metode B Metode A -1.3691
Metode C -1.3691
Metode C Metode A -1.4525
Metode B -1.5358
Bonferroni Metode A Metode B -1.8840
Metode C -1.8007
Metode B Metode A -1.7173
Metode C -1.7173
Metode C Metode A -1.8007
Metode B -1.8840
Nilai Bahasa Inggris LSD Metode A Metode B -3.3278
Metode C -8.4111
Metode B Metode A .3389
Metode C -6.5778
Metode C Metode A 5.4222
Metode B 3.5889
Bonferroni Metode A Metode B -3.6860
Metode C -8.7694
95% Confidence .

Dependent Variable (I) Metode Mengajar (J) Metode Mengajar Upper Bound
Nilai Matematika LSD Metode A Metode B 1.3691
Metode C 1.4525
Metode B Metode A 1.5358
Metode C 1.5358
Metode C Metode A 1.4525
Metode B 1.3691
Bonferroni Metode A Metode B 1.7173
Metode C 1.8007
Metode B Metode A 1.8840
Metode C 1.8840
Metode C Metode A 1.8007
Metode B 1.7173
Nilai Bahasa Inggris LSD Metode A Metode B -.3389
Metode C -5.4222
Metode B Metode A 3.3278
Metode C -3.5889
Metode C Metode A 8.4111
Metode B 6.5778
Bonferroni Metode A Metode B .0194
Metode C -5.0640

Multiple Comparisons

Mean
Dependent Variable (I) Metode Mengajar (J) Metode Mengajar Difference (I-J)
Metode B Metode A 1.8333
*
Metode C -5.0833
*
Metode C Metode A 6.9167
*
Metode B 5.0833
 Dependent Variable (I) Metode Mengajar (J) Metode Mengajar Std. Error Sig.
Metode B Metode A .73455 .053
Metode C .73455 .000
Metode C Metode A .73455 .000
Metode B .73455 .000

Multiple Comparisons
95% ...

Dependent Variable (I) Metode Mengajar (J) Metode Mengajar Lower Bound
Metode B Metode A -.0194
Metode C -6.9360

Metode C Metode A 5.0640

Metode B 3.2306

Multiple Comparisons

95% Confidence . Upper

Dependent Variable (I) Metode Mengajar (J) Metode Metode
Mengajar Bound
Metode B A 3.6860
Metode C -3.2306

Metode C Metode A 8.7694

Metode B 6.9360

Based on observed means.

The error term is Mean Square(Error) = 3.237.
*. The mean difference is significant at the .05 level