Full download Labour in Turkey 1st Edition Abreg Çelem pdf docx
Full download Labour in Turkey 1st Edition Abreg Çelem pdf docx
Full download Labour in Turkey 1st Edition Abreg Çelem pdf docx
https://ebookgate.com
https://ebookgate.com/product/labour-in-
turkey-1st-edition-abreg-celem/
https://ebookgate.com/product/advances-in-agronomy-80-1st-edition-
donald-l-sparks/
ebookgate.com
https://ebookgate.com/product/warships-in-the-war-of-the-
pacific-1879-83-1st-edition-angus-konstam/
ebookgate.com
https://ebookgate.com/product/political-parties-in-turkey-1st-edition-
barry-rubin/
ebookgate.com
https://ebookgate.com/product/commercial-electrical-inspector-
icc-e2-exam-prep-2018th-edition-cliff-burger/
ebookgate.com
Advances in Cancer Research 80 1st Edition George F. Vande
Woude (Editor)
https://ebookgate.com/product/advances-in-cancer-research-80-1st-
edition-george-f-vande-woude-editor/
ebookgate.com
https://ebookgate.com/product/islamic-schools-in-modern-turkey-iren-
ozgur/
ebookgate.com
https://ebookgate.com/product/labour-law-in-namibia-1st-edition-
collins-parker/
ebookgate.com
https://ebookgate.com/product/a-slow-death-83-days-of-radiation-
sickness-nhk-tv-crew/
ebookgate.com
A. S. ÇELEM & P. AKÇAGÜN (Eds.)
Abreg S. ÇELEM & Pelin AKÇAGÜN (Eds.)
Abreg S. ÇELEM & Pelin AKÇAGÜN (Eds.)
Labour in Turkey: Economic, Political and Social Perspectives
Abreg S. Çelem received his Ph.D. in Econometrics with his dissertation entitled
“New Open Economy Macroeconomics; Exchange Rates and Current Account: An
Empirical Analysis” from Gazi University, Ankara in 2011. His fields of expertise
Labour in Turkey
are time series analysis, panel data analysis and microeconometrics.
Pelin Akçagün obtained her B.Sc., M.Sc. and Ph.D. from Middle East Technical
University Department of Economics. As a visiting research scholar, she studied
at University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign and worked on spatial econo-
metrics. Her Ph.D. thesis received Middle East Technical University Best Ph.D.
Thesis Award and Central Bank of the Republic of Turkey Academic Encourage-
ment Award. Her research interests include theoretical econometrics and applied
econometrics with special focus on regional development and labour economics.
Abreg S. Çelem received his Ph.D. in Econometrics with his dissertation enti-
tled “New Open Economy Macroeconomics; Exchange Rates and Current
Account: An Empirical Analysis” from Gazi University, Ankara, in 2011. His fields
of expertise are time series analysis, panel data analysis and microeconometrics.
He works at the Department of Economics, Ondokuz Mayıs University, Samsun,
since 2005. E-mail: [email protected]
Pelin Akçagün is Assistant Professor in the Department of Economics at
Ondokuz Mayis University. She received her B.Sc., M.Sc. and Ph.D. from Middle
East Technical University, Department of Economics. As a visiting research
scholar, she studied at University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign during 2013–
2014. Her Ph.D. thesis on Spatial Econometric Analysis of Regional Growth and
Employment Convergence in Turkey received Middle East Technical University
Best Ph.D. Thesis Award and Central Bank of the Republic of Turkey Academic
Encouragement Award. Her research interests include theoretical economet-
rics and applied econometrics with special focus on regional development and
labour economics. E-mail: [email protected]
Nihan Ciğerci Ulukan is Assistant Professor in Labour Economics and
Industrial Relations Department at Ordu University in Turkey. She has a B.A.,
M.A and Ph.D. in Labour Economics and Industrial Relations from Marmara
University, Istanbul, Turkey. Her Ph.D. dissertation is entitled “Migrants and
Labour Market: Bulgarian Migrants in Bursa”. Throughout her academic career,
she has been mainly concentrating on the migration and labour relations in
Turkey. Her current research focuses on circular migration and seasonal migrant
labour. E-mail: [email protected]
Umut Ulukan is Assistant Professor in Labour Economics and Industrial
Relations Department at Ordu University in Turkey where he has been a faculty
member since 2009. He has a B.A. and M.A in Labour Economics and Industrial
Relations from Marmara University, Istanbul, Turkey. He holds a Ph.D. in
Development Economics from the same university. His Ph.D. dissertation enti-
tled “Structural Change of Turkish Agriculture and Contract Farming” was
published in 2009 (in Turkish) and was also awarded by Turkish Social Sciences
Association. His current research focuses on the new patterns of social differ-
entiation among small-scale fishers in Turkey. E-mail: [email protected]
Contributors 13
Abstract: In this study, the implications and limits of Industry 4.0 project will be discussed.
Industry 4.0 is a European project that aims to integrate digital networks and manufacturing
process with the whole commodity-value chain by using sensors and cyber-physical sys-
tems, that is, the integration of computation, networking, and physical processes. In order
to understand the Digital Age, the study will first examine Marx’s analysis of evolution of
Machinery and the social relations that produce this machinery. This will pave the way for
conceptualizing automation and artificial intelligence as the key elements of Industry 4.0.
After analysing the origins and social context of Industry 4.0 project, the study will discuss
the implications and limits of the “Industry 4.0 initiative”. The discussion is built over some
crucial questions: If the whole process is digitalized and controlled by computer algorithms
as projected, can the industrial production as a whole be optimized and integrated? Do
the Big Data and analytics make “online capitalism” possible? On the condition of the
contradicting interests and profits in capitalist competition, is it possible to think optimi-
zation only as a technical problem? Does “the invisible hand” of the market become visible
by the Big Data gathered from cyber-physical systems? By discussing these questions,
the study will criticise the blackboxing of “algorithms”, “optimization” paradigms of the
Industry 4.0 discourse. It will argue that blackboxing the “algorithms”, “cyber-physical
systems” or “Big Data and Analytics” would not hide the problem of agency, the actors
seeking for profit particularly under real-time competition. In the end, the study will sug-
gest that the project would be a false promise for capitalism but an important possibility
for another world.
Keywords: Industry 4.0, Cybernetics, Babbage, capitalist competition
1. Introduction
The past decade has seen the rapid development of internet and the digitaliza-
tion of different aspects of the social production. The digital technologies called
the Internet of Things (IoT) collected our data, processed and accumulated it as
the Big Data. It was inevitable that the big data and data analytics would enter
248 Özgür NARİN
1 Note that the controversy about the originality of the idea of programming the analyt-
ical engine has some patriarchal echoes (Hollings, Martin et al., 2017, 2018).(Swade,
2001, pp. 168–170). Although Babbage designed and built the Analytical Engine,
Lovelace seems to have her originality about the table and the form of successive
iterations (Hollings, Martin et al., 2017, 2018).
2 Nick Dyer-Witheford suggested to start from Marx at the time of “Difference Engine”.
Although used the similar dual analysis, had a different emphasis on the development
of the components of machinery (Dyer-Witheford, 1999).
250 Özgür NARİN
3 For the details, c.f. Roth’s comprehensive article on Marx and technical change (Roth,
2010, p. 1237).
4 The distinction was as two parts in Babbage, “1) machines for the production of power;
2) Machines for power transmission and work machines. This subdivision -which
actually contains three categories, but formally only two- is a contradiction that Marx
later resolves in Capital” (Winkelmann, 1982, p. XCIII). c.f. (Roth, 2010, p. 1238).
Industry 4.0: Brand New World or False Promise? 251
All of these mechanisms had been considered important for Marx but appar-
ently, he thought them as automatic, just self-acting machines5 making qual-
ified workers superfluous which was and is still true (Marx, 1988, p. 346).
Nevertheless, those machines had the property of self-stopping or some kind
of self-control which meant that they had also the elementary forms of feedback
mechanism. “[T]he way forward towards a clear understanding and a mathemat-
ical formulation of the theory of feedback systems was through engineering: first
through mechanics — the regulation of prime movers led to an understanding of
stability, ... to the development of servomechanisms” (Bennett, 2008).
The self-actor and fly-ball governors used in mules and engines to regulate
the engine, either to stop or adapt to new conditions were the first elements of
feedback and servomechanisms (Rolt, 1965), (Ramtin, 1991, p. 45). Self-acting
machine was a machine “reflecting upon itself ” to control itself according to a
feedback. It is possible to trace back the elementary forms of the feedback up to
1700s (Bennett, 2008).6
As we will see later, feedback mechanism will be more important when
automatic machines gained the capabilities of regulating themselves according
to these feedback inputs and note that, transmitting mechanism and working
mechanism not just took part in all these different processes but also changed in
relation to these requirements. It is not hard intuitively to realize the transforma-
tion of these transmission process to information process.
When the great nineteenth-century tool-makers produced their machine tools and used
them to create a variety of new and complex special-purpose machines such as Roberts’
self-acting spinning mule, it speedily became obvious that the old system of power trans-
mission was totally inadequate to the demands which the new machines made upon it. The
best method of transmitting power to machines became the subject of great debate among
engineers. (Rolt, 1965, p. 123)
7 As Caffentzis argued, along with the British Government and “venture capitalists”,
Marx also ignored Babbage’s engine. He draws our attention to the reasons (Caffentzis,
2013, pp. 193–194).
Industry 4.0: Brand New World or False Promise? 253
Babbage’s most important work was the invention and construction of a com-
puting machine, which would contribute to the improvement of astronomical
calculations as well as the printing of logarithm tables (Winkellman, 1982, p. 63).
Back then, error-free calculation and printing of those large tables had been a
huge and toiling task, and it was better to compute and print by mechanical
tools, using steam power.8 From 1834 to 1843, Babbage improved his “difference
engine” by using punched cards to input numbers into his engine – a series of
cards with holes in them to represent the numbers. This procedure had been
invented in France by Jacquard, a hundred years earlier and, around 1800, it was
perfected for weaving complex patterns (Collier and McLachlan, 1998, p. 68).9
The new machine, “analytical engine” was not only a calculator. Ada Lovelace
wrote that it “weaves algebraical patterns just as the Jacquard-loom weaves
flowers and leaves” (Fuegi and Francis, 2003, p. 16).
To weave algebraic patterns meant that it can calculate different functions as
coded in the punch cards. But as Ada Lovelace brilliantly realized, this meant
that with successive iterations and using variable punch cards, it was possible to
“weave” the algebraic patterns, that is to program the analytical engine.
[T]he Analytical Engine,’ as A.A.L. [Ada Lovelace] so clearly stressed, ‘does not occupy
common ground with mere ‘calculating machines’.’ This formulation, based on what only
existed as a virtual machine in 1843, went beyond any known statement of Babbage, and
beyond distinguished predecessors in mechanical calculation such as Blaise Pascal and
Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz. A.A.L. anticipated advanced work in the next century of Alan
Turing, Konrad Zuse, Howard Aiken, Grace Hopper, and John von Neumann. (Fuegi and
Francis, 2003, p. 24).
This was not just an early step towards computers (Zuse, Aiken, Turing and von
Neumann) and the digital world that will flourish a century later but also a crucial
change in the development of the machinery system.10 The transmission mech-
anism and working mechanism gradually switched to the role of information
8 As Babbage, once said “I wish to God these calculations had been executed by steam”
(Swade, 2001, p. 9).
9 “The first programmable machine was a loom, devised in 1805 by Joseph Marie
Jacquard (1752–1834), that used punched cards to store instructions for the pattern
to be woven” (Russell & Norvig, 2016, p. 14).
10 It is interesting that Babbage had also taken the idea of using electromechanical
switching instead of mechanical techniques for the Calculating Engines from his friend,
Wheatstone. “Considering the date, 1839, the idea is breathtaking, coming almost a
century ahead of Howard Aiken making his first advanced calculator proposals to
IBM” (Fuegi & Francis, 2003, p. 24).
254 Özgür NARİN
transfer, which had the clues of data processing, transfer or storage. That was
an early birth of digital world which would be completed in the next century.
Indeed, just a century later, first computers would be built with the same archi-
tecture (data storage, processor, and input/output).11 As Caffentzis argued: “a
new theory of machines was developed in the 1930s (associated with Turing,
von Neumann, Wiener, and Shannon) that could not have been known to Marx
and the classical Marxists (and its ideological impact began to be increasingly felt
in the years after the revolt of 1960s)” (2013, p. 157).
During World War II, anti-aircraft fire control posed a critical problem.
US military-industrial complex backed a set of research projects that brought
together diverse threads of control.12 From this work emerged new theories and
practices of feedback, control, and computing. Besides, the feedback and control,
or in a way transmitting mechanism and working mechanism had to be merged.
Hence engineers merged the communications and control in the integrated sys-
tems, that is servomechanisms (Mindell, 2002, p. 9). This was the beginning of
cybernetics and the digital age. Now the machinery system became a complex
totality of integrated systems of transmitting and working mechanisms.13
Norbert Wiener, in his 1948 book Cybernetics: or Control and Communication in the
Animal and the Machine, articulated the marriage of communication and control for a
generation of engineers, systems theorists... Wiener declared the merger occurred instantly,
obviously and completely in the course of his work on anti-aircraft prediction devices. ‘I
think that I can claim credit,’ Wiener wrote in his memoir, ‘...for transferring the whole
theory of the servomechanism bodily to communication engineering’. (Mindell et al.,
2003, p. 68)
11 Cf. On similarities with the major components of modern computer (Caffentzis, 2013,
p. 192). Alan Turing, Von Neumann admitted A.A.L’s contribution.
12 Just for the sake of simplicity and limits, a full discussion of cybernetics, so the USSR
counterpart of Cybernetics research (Kolmogorov, Andronov, Kitov, Glushkov etc.)
lies beyond the scope of this paper. Cf. (Gerovitch, 2002).
13 The integrated totality that the feedback mechanisms can’t be distinguished (Ashby,
1957, p. 54).
Industry 4.0: Brand New World or False Promise? 255
mechanism had the potentiality of “learning sequence”14 that could adapt itself
to multiple conditions, which meant the clues of nowadays’ Artificial Intelligence
systems. Industry 4.0 is based on such developments in cybernetic and network
theory, includes evolution of the computers, data analytics, sensors, and artifi-
cial intelligence. For example, the main element of Industry 4.0, Cyber-Physical
Systems (CPS) is defined with feedback loops and networks. CPS are integrations
of computation with physical processes. Through sensors gathering data,
embedded computers and networks monitor and control the physical processes,
usually with feedback loops where physical processes affect computations and
vice versa. The analysis of the machinery in Industry 4.0 will be examined later,
but the technical analysis and social analysis of the Cybernetic age of machinery,
as well as the machinery system of Industry 4.0 will follow the same historical
and theoretical path.
14 “Such a designed structure can respond to multiple conditions affecting the output
or product being produced. It is, in an extremely simplified and ‘primitive’ sense, a
‘learning’ sequence” (Ramtin, 1991, p. 45).
256 Özgür NARİN
15 Sometimes translated as “all the sciences have been pressed into the service of capital”
(Marx, 1973).
16 As Roman Rosdolsky wrote, some facsimiles of Grundrisse (“Rohentwurf ”) were avail-
able but to a limited circle after 1939. The manuscript became lost in circumstances
was first effectively published, in the German original, in 1953. “it is clear that the
Grundrisse invites reexamination and possible revision of widely received comparisons
of Marx’s and Schumpeter’s respective visions of capitalism’s future” (Eliott, 1979,
p. 149).
Industry 4.0: Brand New World or False Promise? 257
process, the relative surplus value and the cycles of “analysis” (science enlisted
by capital).
First part is known as labour-saving machinery. Both Babbage and Ure
pointed out this characteristic of mechanization. But Marx’s analysis is more
complex. Marx, frequently cited Ure’s well known example of invention of the
“Iron Man”, that is Roberts’ Self-acting mule. In one of the periods of growing
class struggle, the Manchester capitalists asked Roberts to design a machine that
would replace the rebel workers. He designed the self-acting spinning machine
called Iron Man. Machinery substituting labour had been discussed for a long
time. Marx’s analysis transcends labour saving characteristics since class struggle
in the process of production is a continuous process that needs not show itself
as only strikes or riots. As Braverman, the development and design trajectory of
machinery is shaped by class struggle in broad sense.17 Not just struggle amongst
the workers and employers or day-to-day resistances to the speed of production
or to the worsening conditions in the workplace but also inner struggle of the
capitalist class shapes this trajectory: competition between the capitalists. This is
related to the second part.
Second part is about the inner core of surplus value creating mechanism.
While Marx was analysing the forms of surplus value, he pointed out the dual
nature of it as absolute surplus value creation and relative surplus value creation.
These two alternative mechanisms are in fact different methods of increasing
surplus value. Former is to increase the working hours whereas the latter, relative
surplus value creation is to increase surplus value by mechanization of produc-
tion process (Heinrich, 2013), cheapening the commodities, hence decreasing
the time necessary to earn the wage. So relative surplus value creation is the
drive for mechanization of the production process. The inner motive for rela-
tive surplus value appears as external competition and leads to mechanization.
Machinery does not create surplus value or value. Its value is transferred to the
product over the economic lifetime of the machine. Marx corrected his argument
in the French edition of Capital: “C’est une méthode particulière pour fabriquer
de la plus-value relative” (Marx, 1989, p. 317). Mechanization is method to create
surplus value. For any given working day, the use of machinery increases the rate
of surplus value via cheapening commodities. This compulsion is at the heart of
the dynamics of capitalist production and has several social consequences that
17 “It would be possible to write a whole history of the inventions made since 1830,
for the sole purpose of providing capital with weapons against working class revolts”
(Marx, 1976).
258 Özgür NARİN
affects the class struggle, hence shapes and limits the development of machinery.
Reducing labour time means deskilling and domination of the constant cap-
ital (machinery) over living labour, unemployment and last but not least, the
“immanent contradiction” within the sphere of production. The dual antago-
nistic forces (tendencies and counter-tendencies) leading to crises and the fall of
rate of profit are unleashed. Mechanization is the rising technical composition
of production and general reduction in living labour time. This creates the ten-
dency of rate of profit to fall. This limits the investments in scientific produc-
tion hence mechanization. But there is also a counter tendency. Rising technical
composition means productivity and hence producing machinery cheaper. That
is value composition of technology decreases, i.e. counter-tendency to rate of
profit to fall. All these cyclic movements of production also form an arena of
class struggle so this contradictory class relations determine the production of
machinery and also more importantly, the innovation process of the machinery,
that is scientific production. This takes us to the complementing last part.
Third part is about the scientific production that is increasingly becoming cap-
italist labour process. As Marx had given the clue, invention has already become
a business, “and the application of science to direct production itself becomes
a prospect which determines and solicits” (Marx, 1973). Moreover, science has
become a sector of capitalist production although it has inner contradictions.
The cyclical processes that lead to crises also affects scientific production and
hence the innovation and development of the machinery. But it would be inter-
esting to reconsider one of Marx’s point as historically reoccurring. As Babbage,
he related the great inventions of machinery in the first half of 19th century with
the analysis of the labour process, division of labour. Analysis in both senses, sci-
entific analysis of the process and also the dissection of the production process.
It is, firstly, the analysis and application of mechanical and chemical laws, arising directly
out of science, which enables the machine to perform the same labour as that previously
performed by the worker. However, the development of machinery along this path occurs
only when large industry has already reached a higher stage, and all the sciences have
been pressed into the service of capital; … But this is not the road along which machinery,
by and large, arose, and even less the road on which it progresses in detail. This road is,
rather, dissection [Analyse] – through the division of labour, which gradually transforms
the workers’ operations into more and more mechanical ones, so that at a certain point a
mechanism can step into their places. (Marx, 1973)
Noting that dual sense, let us reconsider the epoch as epoch of scientific analysis,
that uses the dissection of the labour process and gradually transforms it. Then
it would be possible to see the post-war years of the 1950s as the new epoch of
analysis that leads to information theory, Cybernetic theory (Narin, 2017). This
Industry 4.0: Brand New World or False Promise? 259
epoch of analysis led to new forms of “dissection”. Following era would be the
new analysis period of digital networks, internet, and computers. Maybe “Big
Data” and algorithms are the signals of another one?
All these epochs of “analysis” are actually phases of scientific production in the
process of real subsumption of scientific labour to capital. So, all these analysis
processes leading to new waves of mechanization have the same governing
dynamics, that is increasing surplus value and profit. But under the conditions of
the tendency of rate of profit to fall, scientific innovations, machinery, and auto-
mation have their inner cyclical movements, contradictions, and limits.
So, today’s new technologies have their origins at this continuity in the devel-
opment of machinery, but at the same time, limits in such social relations. Let us
now consider the Industry 4.0 project in the light of these arguments.
learning systems for gathering, evaluating, and analysing data. Hence new dis-
coveries in machine learning like deep learning. The implementation of these
developments in manufacturing was inevitable. On the manufacturing side, as
Naude et al. noted (2019), there are technological innovations such as digital
platforms, artificial intelligence (based on big data) and automation, additive
manufacturing (3D-printing), and smart materials. According to these writers,
this was a disruption and was already evident in manufacturing. That was a
“new” industrial revolution (Marsh, 2012), a “second machine age” (Brynjolfsson
& McAfee, 2015), or a “4th industrial revolution” (Schwab, 2016). As analysed in
the development of machinery, technology is a social construction, so whether it
is named as “second machine age” or “4th industrial revolution”, either way that
is technological determinism and neglects the social relations of production of
new technologies and new machinery.
What seems as if there is a “disruption” is the diffusion of recent digital
innovations in the manufacturing. There were already technological innovations
diffused in other parts of social production such as distribution, marketing, even
finance, etc. The capitalist competition was also evident in these developments.18
While the value chain in commodity production was actually a complex and
international one, the cycles of value chain were fragmented and were ever
expanding. Different parts of capitalist production did always grow unequally
both globally and locally: the distribution, circulation, advertisement, mar-
keting and purchase parts were always more visible in this development phase.
Internet of Things (IoT) was primarily for creating new products, new commod-
ities for the consumers, that is not for manufacturing. On the other hand, ac-
cording to OECD ranking of the 20 companies with the highest spending on
R&D in 2018, the first and second are a retail company and an internet (mainly)
company (OECD, 2019).19 They are definitely not manufacturing companies. As
of the artificial intelligence investments, OECD (2018) points out the dramatic
increase in Autonomous vehicles (AV) and AV start-ups. Those new technolo-
gies mostly implemented at the end-user side or consumer side. Most of the AI
innovations are used in marketing in either measuring the behaviour of con-
sumers, evaluating the consumer profile in order to market the commodities
18 “Many of these digital tools are most widely diffused in ICT-intensive and services
sectors; however, large potential also lies in their usage in manufacturing and industrial
production” (OECD, 2019: 51).
19 The former invested 22.6 billion USD for R&D, while the latter 16,2 billion USD.
Comparing these giant companies with the R&D expenditure of Turkey would be inter-
esting. In 2018, it was 2.5 billion USD, that is less than one-tenth of the first company.
Industry 4.0: Brand New World or False Promise? 261
or in the health sector. It is important to note that the production of new tech-
nologies also belongs to manufacturing side but the role of implementing those
innovations to conventional manufacturing sector is still important. Making
robots or AI for consumers is something, but making robots that produce robots
is another thing. So, although digital technologies themselves are manufacturing
facilities, implementing those innovations in conventional manufacturing sector
has various consequences. Diffusion of these technologies in industry and
manufacturing is important (Hirsch-Kreinsen, 2014). From this point of view,
Industry 4.0 is related to our technical analysis of development of machinery
in the previous section. Automation, artificial intelligence, and data analytics
implemented in manufacturing means a new stage in the machinery system.
But technical analysis of the machinery is not enough and leads to technolog-
ical determinism if not accompanied by the social analysis of this development.
“Industry 4.0” might be important in this technical sense, but would it fulfil its
promises? This needs the social analysis in the previous section.
If the investigation is not completed with the social analysis of machinery, the
limits and inner contradictions will not be clear. This will end up in a highly opti-
mistic view of “fourth industrial revolution”: a brand-new world!
The limits of the project are actually inherent in its origination. The conditions
of its birth determine its development. So how did this project start and can it
fulfil its promises?
The project – at least as a discourse – that spread around the world is actu-
ally about “securing the future of German Industry” as written in one of the
main documents of the Initiative (Kagermann et al., 2013). Industry 4.0 was
actually another step in the global capitalist competition. The previous step
by Europe was as a part of the Lisbon Strategy, to catch up and overtake USA
in the development of digital technologies (Fuchs, 2018), (Schiller et al., 2017,
p. 76). EU tried it until 2010 and failed. But the competition was not “withering
on both sides of the Atlantic”. It was possible to see that in the steps toward
Industry 4.0 as suggested by Germany. While US capital had been the initiator
of the Internet of Things (IoT) and Industrial Internet of Things as the imple-
mentation of it to manufacturing (Greengard, 2015), the response on the other
side of the Atlantic came from Germany. The United States did not adopt the
term as “Industry 4.0”. For example, General Electric used the term Industrial
Internet or Industrial Internet of Things and CISCO coined the term “Internet
of Everything” (Gilchrist, 2016), (Bartodziej, 2017).
After a failed step in the competition, instead of competing in the arena that
US is superior, Germany chose the digitalization of the manufacturing sector.
The country’s competitive advantage was to implement IoT to manufacturing
262 Özgür NARİN
40
30
China
Germany
European Union
20
OECD members
United States
10
0
1991 1993 1995 1997 1999 2001 2003 2005 2007 2009 2011 2013 2015 2017
THE PURSUIT.
QUEENIE’S CALLER.
THE CRISIS.
Marjorie, however, did not hear of John’s visit the next day, for all
night long she tossed in a fever, and towards morning she relaxed
into a sort of stupor. The whole family were seriously alarmed; Jack
was sent for, and the physician summoned earlier than he was
expected.
The man, an old friend of the family, re-examined her most
thoroughly, and noted the symptoms again. Mrs. Wilkinson watched
anxiously at the bedside, and Queenie, in the doorway, was very
near to tears.
“Pleurisy!” he muttered finally. “I feared it yesterday.” Then he
gave Mrs. Wilkinson some directions, and went down stairs in search
of her husband. Stealthily Queenie followed, pausing in the hall, to
hear if possible the real verdict.
“It looks pretty serious to me, Wilkinson,” she heard the doctor
say; “Marjorie’s condition is poor—she is completely run down. I
should advise a nurse.”
Queenie stifled a sob, not only at the gravity of her illness, but at
the idea of bringing in some one strange to do for her what Queenie
herself longed to do. If she were only a nurse!
“Certainly—by all means,” Mr. Wilkinson was saying. “Will you
arrange for it, Doctor?”
“Yes; I’ll get the most capable one I know of—and hope to have
her here by noon. In the meantime, Mrs. Wilkinson has directions.”
Queenie could restrain herself no longer; she burst into the room
and took hold of the doctor’s coat lapels.
“You—you don’t think that she will die, do you?” she blurted out
hysterically.
“Oh, no,” answered the doctor gravely; “she has a good chance.
Marjorie has always been healthy.”
“It’s her first real sickness since childhood,” supplied Mr. Wilkinson,
with an effort towards cheerfulness. “And that ought to help.”
“No doubt it will,” came the doctor’s reassuring reply.
“But please tell me what I can do!” begged the girl tremulously.
“Just whatever Mrs. Wilkinson tells you,” answered the physician.
“And try to keep your spirits up,” he added, as he picked up his case.
After he had gone, Queenie looked desperately at Mr. Wilkinson,
and repeated her question.
“Well, I should think that you could wait on Mrs. Wilkinson, as the
doctor said, and answer the telephone when friends inquire about
Marjorie, and write notes if she receives flowers, and help with the
housework and marketing——”
“Oh, I can! I’m sure I can!” she cried, in relief to find that she
could actually be of some service.
The hours dragged wearily by; Marjorie almost a ghost of her
former self, lay on the bed, motionless and almost lifeless while the
hideous disease worked its calamity in her system. Queenie tiptoed
in and out of the room at Mrs. Wilkinson’s call, but Marjorie was
totally unaware of her presence. At noon the nurse, a splendidly
capable young woman, arrived and relieved the tired mother, who
consented to go to bed. Queenie was thankful to go out and do the
marketing; for a while at least she would be too busy to think.
Early in the evening Mr. Richards came to inquire after Marjorie,
and, seeing how tired and nervous Queenie was, offered to take her
out for a ride in the car. Queenie assented indifferently, unable to
find much interest in anything.
“Isn’t she the least bit better?” he asked, as they started. “Not the
tiniest bit?”
“No,” returned Queenie dismally. “If anything, she’s worse. The
doctor’s afraid of pneumonia now. A night-nurse is coming on to-
morrow.”
“I wish that I could do something,” said Mr. Richards.
To his amazement, Queenie suddenly burst out crying.
“That’s the dreadful thing, Mr. Richards—we can’t do anything!
Those strange nurses, who mean nothing to her, can do everything,
and all we can do is sit back and hope. Oh, it makes me feel terrible!
Suppose she dies!—I can’t help thinkin’ of all the mean things I’ve
done to her, and said to her—Oh!—Oh!——” Suddenly she drooped
her head upon the back of the seat and sobbed miserably.
“Don’t—please don’t take it so hard, little girl,” the young man
pleaded, surprised and affected by the depth of the girl’s feeling. “I
don’t think Miss Wilkinson ever thinks of anything like that.”
“Yes, yes, she must!” Queenie protested. “The first night she saw
us we were so awful, made fun of her, and laughed at her—and then
that hike, when we picked up those fellows—Gee! How I wish I’d
never seen them! And then the time I left her in the lurch at the
game on account of that worthless Sam MacDonald and forced her
to play! Oh, Mr. Richards, do you s’pose that’s what made her sick?
If it’s my fault—and she dies——” She ended in another volley of
weeping.
Mr. Richards slowed down and laid a sympathetic hand upon her
shoulder.
“Please don’t blame yourself so, Queenie,” he said softly. “Of
course it wasn’t your fault. And you were young and thoughtless
then—and didn’t know any better. Now you’re a young woman—and
a very admirable young woman; Miss Wilkinson must be proud and
happy to know how splendidly you have developed. Six months ago
you didn’t have the capacity to feel in this way. And surely your
captain isn’t going to die; she’s going to live, and rejoice in your
friendship. Your duty is not to dwell on the past, and what you have
been but to think of what you can still do to make her proud of you!”
Queenie grew calmer at these reassuring words and the
sympathetic manner and sat up and dried her eyes. At that moment,
Mr. Richards seemed like the most wonderful man in the world to
her.
“I’m going to live in that belief,” she announced resolutely. “Now
drive me home, so that I can write some notes to the scouts. All of
the girls in the troop will want to hear just how Miss Wilkinson is.”
“All right, and I’ll help you if I may,” he rejoined. “I can drop your
notes into the post office tonight.”
As soon as he was gone she crept noiselessly to bed—half happy
and half sad. This new friendship seemed wonderful to her, yet if she
was to have it at the cost of Marjorie’s illness, it was not worth it.
The next day brought little change in the patient’s condition.
Flowers and notes and messages continued to arrive, but Marjorie
was oblivious to all that was going on. Queenie took charge of
everything, and presently fell into a routine of duties which at least
kept her calm.
To her surprise, however, she found no word from John Hadley, no
expression of concern from the one person who she expected would
be most solicitous. This seemed so strange to her that she
mentioned the fact to Jack at dinner, and he replied that he had
heard that he had gone out of town.
“But he knows she is sick,” continued Queenie; “because I told
him the day he brought me to college.”
“I believe he was here that first night to inquire,” remarked Jack.
“Are you sure he hasn’t telephoned?”
“Not when I was at home,” answered the girl.
The day nurse entered the room softly and stood in the doorway,
a mute appeal in her eyes. Mrs. Wilkinson rose anxiously.
“I’m afraid Miss Marjorie’s worse,” she whispered. “I think we had
better call the doctor—and suggest a consultation. I expect the crisis
tonight.”
“Oh!” gasped Queenie, choking over the food she had put into her
mouth, but with a great effort summoning her control. She had
already learned the necessity of self-restraint.
Mr. Wilkinson went to the telephone, and Mrs. Wilkinson returned
to the sick room with the nurse. Queenie turned to her supper and
tried to eat.
In half an hour the doctors were there, and the young people
retired to the library, to await the result of the consultation. The
minutes dragged by; neither Jack nor Queenie made any attempt to
talk; both sat listlessly staring at the newspapers in their hands,
without making any pretense at reading them. At last the doctors
left, but it was some time before they could get any information.
Finally the nurse came down to telephone a prescription and Jack
seized upon her eagerly.
“We don’t know anything more,” she replied quietly; “only that if
your sister lives through tonight, she is likely to get well.”
Jack swallowed hard and Queenie began to sob.
“Do—you expect her to?” he finally managed to inquire.
“We hope so,” was the unassuring reply. “She is asleep now, under
a drug. When she wakens up——”
“About what time?” demanded Queenie.
“Probably about midnight. The doctor is coming back to spend the
night here.”
Queenie watched the nurse go back to the sick room and she sat
still, pondering.
“I tell you what I’m going to do, Jack,” she said slowly: “I’m going
to bed now and set my alarm for about two o’clock.” She began to
weep again. “Oh, Jack! She must live!”
“Sure—she’s going to!” he managed to say, with forced
cheerfulness.
Queenie went sound asleep the minute her head touched the
pillow, fortified by the belief that she would be awake at the crucial
moment. But so tired was she from the exhaustion and strain of the
last three or four days, that she slept more soundly than she had
expected. The alarm went off unheeded; it was not until the
morning sun streamed into the room that she finally opened her
eyes. Then she jumped up in horror and remorse at her error.
Suppose—suppose—that Marjorie had died!
She rushed out into the hall, flinging a kimona around her
shoulders as she went, and almost bumped into Mrs. Wilkinson in
the passageway. The mother’s face was haggard, but a great look of
peace flooded it.
“Tell me! Tell me!” whispered the girl, clutching her arm.
“The crisis is past—and Marjorie’s alive!” replied Mrs. Wilkinson.
“But so weak! She spoke once to me—calling ‘Mother,’ but she
doesn’t seem to know anybody else.”
“Thank God!” breathed Queenie devoutly.
She went back into her room, and dressed. A deep feeling of
thankfulness filled her heart; she made tremendous resolves as she
went about her task, pledging herself to a veritable life of service.
She would do anything, anything at all, that Marjorie asked, in the
future.
The morning brought many visitors, inquiring for the sick girl, and
many boxes of flowers. Queenie received them all, happier than she
had ever been in her life before.
In the evening Mr. Richards came again, and took her for a ride.
To him, too, she seemed like a totally different girl.
“You are ready to think about your own future now?” he asked,
smiling at her gaiety.
“I guess so—when I’m sure Miss Wilkinson’s better. Oh, Mr.
Richards, do you think she will be able to graduate?”
“I should think so. Spring vacation isn’t over yet—she really hasn’t
been ill long.”
“No, it only seems long.”
Again he made an effort to induce Queenie to talk about herself.
“I have something in mind for you, Queenie,” he said. “Are you
interested?”
“Yes, if it will wait until next week. I have a lot to do here, now.”
He saw that it was indeed useless, for when they returned to the
house, they found that the night nurse had been called away and
Queenie was swift to offer her services.
“Please try me tonight, Mrs. Wilkinson!” she urged. “I’ll be ever so
careful!”
“You are sure you want to?” asked the mother. “I will sleep in the
next room, and the day nurse on the other side.”
“Oh, yes, please!” She put her whole soul into her pleading.
“All right then—and promise to call me if anything happens.”
“I promise!” breathed Queenie, thankful to be considered so
responsible.
CHAPTER XXIV.
CONCLUSION.