Closing Theory of Writing
Closing Theory of Writing
Introduction
This essay is both a reflection on what I have learned and a guide for how I intend to
improve. It emphasizes writing as not merely a static act but a dynamic process where ideas are
constantly evolving, connecting, and engaging with broader contexts and audiences. Rather than
viewing a piece of writing as a self-contained artifact, this theory positions it as part of a larger
of writing rooted in this concept focuses on three key elements: connecting to the bigger picture,
understand how this theory shapes effective and meaningful conclusions, fostering deeper
of Literary Form, provides a foundation for this theory. Burke likens writing to entering a parlor
where a discussion is already in progress. You listen for a while, contribute your perspective, and
then leave, knowing the conversation will persist in your absence. This idea underscores the
collaborative and iterative nature of writing, where individual contributions build on existing
In this context, a closing theory of writing serves as an invitation for readers to continue
engaging with the ideas presented. The conclusion is not a definitive endpoint but a stepping
stone, connecting the writer’s thoughts to the broader discourse. This perspective shifts the role
of the conclusion from simply summarizing arguments to actively engaging readers in ongoing
One of the primary functions of a strong closing theory is to link the specific discussion
of the text to broader contexts or implications. This connection can take many forms: addressing
situating the discussion within a larger framework, the conclusion adds depth and significance to
the writing, encouraging readers to think beyond the immediate scope of the text.
For example, in Martin Luther King Jr.’s “Letter from Birmingham Jail,” the conclusion
transcends the specific context of the civil rights movement, addressing universal themes of
justice, morality, and the human condition. King’s closing remarks resonate not only with his
immediate audience but with future generations, emphasizing the enduring relevance of his
message. This ability to connect the particular to the universal is a hallmark of the ongoing
conversation theory, demonstrating how a well-crafted conclusion can extend the life and impact
of a piece of writing.
Writing as an Ongoing Conversation: A Closing Theory of Writing
Kevin Chris Carpio
Professor Sunshine
WRT 200
12/08/2024
Encouraging Reflection
Reflection is a cornerstone of the ongoing conversation theory, both for writers and
readers. A strong conclusion invites readers to consider the implications of the arguments
presented, prompting them to explore their own perspectives and beliefs. This reflective process
is not passive; it demands active engagement, encouraging readers to question assumptions, draw
offering nuanced insights, or suggesting avenues for further exploration, the writer creates a
space for intellectual growth and dialogue. This approach aligns with Paulo Freire’s concept of
transformation. In the context of writing, the conclusion becomes a site of mutual discovery,
Maintaining Momentum
Unlike traditional conclusions that seek to “wrap up” an argument, the ongoing
conversation theory emphasizes maintaining momentum. This involves crafting a conclusion that
leaves readers with a sense of curiosity and inspiration, compelling them to engage further with
the ideas presented. By framing the conclusion as a beginning rather than an end, the writer
Writing as an Ongoing Conversation: A Closing Theory of Writing
Kevin Chris Carpio
Professor Sunshine
WRT 200
12/08/2024
encourages readers to take action, whether through continued research, discussion, or personal
reflection.
One effective strategy for maintaining momentum is to end with a call to action or a
writing, where the goal is to inspire change or advocate for a cause. For instance, climate activist
Greta Thunberg often concludes her speeches with urgent appeals to her audience, reinforcing
the immediacy and importance of her message. Similarly, academic writers can use their
conclusions to highlight unresolved questions or propose new areas of inquiry, signaling that the
theory of writing. While the conclusion should provide a clear and accessible summary of the
main arguments, it must also acknowledge the complexity of the issues discussed. This balance
ensures that the conclusion is both intellectually rigorous and engaging, appealing to a diverse
audience.
Achieving this balance requires thoughtful word choice, logical transitions, and a
nuanced understanding of the subject matter. For example, a scientific article might conclude by
summarizing key findings while also acknowledging limitations and suggesting directions for
Writing as an Ongoing Conversation: A Closing Theory of Writing
Kevin Chris Carpio
Professor Sunshine
WRT 200
12/08/2024
future research. This approach not only reinforces the validity of the research but also invites
The ongoing conversation theory emphasizes the collaborative nature of writing, where
feedback and interaction play a crucial role in shaping ideas. This collaborative process extends
to the conclusion, which often incorporates insights gained through dialogue with peers,
instructors, or readers. By engaging with diverse perspectives, the writer can create a conclusion
that resonates with a broader audience, reflecting the collective nature of knowledge production.
This social dimension of writing aligns with Vygotsky’s social learning theory, which
highlights the role of interaction in cognitive development. In the context of writing, the
conclusion becomes a site of shared understanding, where the writer synthesizes multiple
viewpoints to create a cohesive and impactful message. This process not only enhances the
quality of the writing but also reinforces the idea that writing is a communal, iterative endeavor.
The ongoing conversation theory has practical implications for writers across genres and
disciplines. In academic writing, it encourages students to view their work as part of a larger
writing, it inspires authors to craft endings that linger in the reader’s mind, sparking imagination
Writing as an Ongoing Conversation: A Closing Theory of Writing
Kevin Chris Carpio
Professor Sunshine
WRT 200
12/08/2024
and emotion. In professional contexts, it emphasizes the importance of adaptability and audience
awareness, guiding writers to craft conclusions that align with the goals and expectations of their
intended audience.
For educators, this theory provides a framework for teaching writing as a dynamic and
and exploration, educators can help them develop critical thinking skills and a deeper
appreciation for the power of writing. This approach aligns with contemporary pedagogical
practices that prioritize active learning and student-centered instruction, creating a more
Conclusion
larger dialogue, this theory challenges traditional notions of closure, inviting readers and writers
professional contexts, this theory provides a powerful framework for creating meaningful and
impactful writing that transcends the boundaries of the text. As we embrace writing as an
evolving and collaborative endeavor, the closing theory of writing reminds us that every
conclusion is also a new beginning, a catalyst for thought, action, and connection.