Assignment 2
Assignment 2
ASSIGNMENT TWO
This assignment accounts for 10% of the total course mark. (Remarks for each problem is
indicated at the end of the question. This will be translated to the final course grade
proportionally.)
Some problems need to be completed by R. Please include your code at the end of the
assignment as Appendix.
Please hand in on time. Otherwise there will be a 50% discount on your remark.
1
1. Consider the following two models:
(1) 𝑍! = 𝛽" + 𝛽# 𝑡 + 𝑎! ,
(2) (1 − 𝐵)𝑍! = 𝑐 + (1 − 𝜃𝐵)𝑎! ,
assuming that 𝑎! ~𝑖. 𝑖. 𝑑. 𝑁(0,1), |𝜃| < 1 (for (2)).
(a) Given observations 𝑍# , 𝑍$ , … , 𝑍% , forecast 𝑍%&' , i.e., find 𝑍:% (𝑙) and
𝑉𝑎𝑟(𝑒% (𝑙)) for 𝑙 = 1,2, … , 𝐿. (10’)
(b) Show the similarity and differences in the nature of forecasts under the
two models. (Hint: Compare 𝑍:% (𝑙), 𝑍:%&# (𝑙), 𝑉𝑎𝑟(𝑒% (𝑙)) and
𝑉𝑎𝑟(𝑒%&# (𝑙)). What conclusions do you get?). (20’)
2. Let 𝑢! be an i.i.d. sequence with mean zero and variance 𝜎 $ , and let 𝑦! =
𝑢# + 𝑢$ + ⋯ + 𝑢( with 𝑦" = 0. Deduce that
𝑇 )#/$ F 𝑢( 1 1/2
, 0
D G → 𝑁 IJ K , 𝜎 $ L OP,
0 1/2 1/3
𝑇 )+/$ F 𝑦()#
where Σ indicates summation over t from 1 to T. Comparing this result with
Proposition 17.1, argue that
𝑊(1)
0 1 1/2
R U ~𝑁 IJ K , L OP,
T 𝑊(𝑟)𝑑𝑟 0 1/2 1/3
Where the integral sign denotes integration over r from 0 to 1. (Hint:
Exercise 17.1 in Hamilton(1994)) (20’)