Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 260 views

    FPFC v. Nawasa-Oblicon

    Uploaded by

    Czarina Lea D. Morado
    (1) FPFC filed a collection suit against NAWASA in 1967 for unpaid balances on a 1961 contract to supply iron pipes. The trial court ordered NAWASA to pay in negotiable bonds but NAWASA failed to satisfy the decision. (2) FPFC then filed another complaint seeking adjustment due to currency inflation. The Supreme Court ruled that the inflation was not "extraordinary" as defined by Article 1250 despite proven currency devaluation, as this was a worldwide trend rather than extraordinary in the Philippines. (3) Article 1250 allows for currency value adjustment in cases of extraordinary inflation or deflation, but the court found the inflation in this case did not meet the standard of being unusual or unforeseeable

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    FPFC v. Nawasa-Oblicon

    Uploaded by

    Czarina Lea D. Morado
    260 views1 page
    (1) FPFC filed a collection suit against NAWASA in 1967 for unpaid balances on a 1961 contract to supply iron pipes. The trial court ordered NAWASA to pay in negotiable bonds but NAWASA failed to satisfy the decision. (2) FPFC then filed another complaint seeking adjustment due to currency inflation. The Supreme Court ruled that the inflation was not "extraordinary" as defined by Article 1250 despite proven currency devaluation, as this was a worldwide trend rather than extraordinary in the Philippines. (3) Article 1250 allows for currency value adjustment in cases of extraordinary inflation or deflation, but the court found the inflation in this case did not meet the standard of being unusual or unforeseeable

    Original Title

    Fpfc v. Nawasa-oblicon

    Copyright

    © Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    (1) FPFC filed a collection suit against NAWASA in 1967 for unpaid balances on a 1961 contract to supply iron pipes. The trial court ordered NAWASA to pay in negotiable bonds but NAWASA failed to satisfy the decision. (2) FPFC then filed another complaint seeking adjustment due to currency inflation. The Supreme Court ruled that the inflation was not "extraordinary" as defined by Article 1250 despite proven currency devaluation, as this was a worldwide trend rather than extraordinary in the Philippines. (3) Article 1250 allows for currency value adjustment in cases of extraordinary inflation or deflation, but the court found the inflation in this case did not meet the standard of being unusual or unforeseeable

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    260 views1 page

    FPFC v. Nawasa-Oblicon

    Uploaded by

    Czarina Lea D. Morado
    (1) FPFC filed a collection suit against NAWASA in 1967 for unpaid balances on a 1961 contract to supply iron pipes. The trial court ordered NAWASA to pay in negotiable bonds but NAWASA failed to satisfy the decision. (2) FPFC then filed another complaint seeking adjustment due to currency inflation. The Supreme Court ruled that the inflation was not "extraordinary" as defined by Article 1250 despite proven currency devaluation, as this was a worldwide trend rather than extraordinary in the Philippines. (3) Article 1250 allows for currency value adjustment in cases of extraordinary inflation or deflation, but the court found the inflation in this case did not meet the standard of being unusual or unforeseeable

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as docx, pdf, or txt
    of 1

    Obligations and Contracts Article 1250 Czarina

    Filpino Pipe and Foundry Corporation (FPFC) v. National Waterworks and Sewage Authority (NAWSA)
    G.R. No. L-43446 May 3, 1988 The Case: An appeal by FPFC of the dismissal of its complaint against NAWASA. Facts: On June 12, 1961, NAWASA entered into a contract with the plaintiff FPFC for the latter to supply it with iron pressure pipes worth P270, 187.50. NAWASA paid in installments on various dates, leaving a balance of P135, 500.50 excluding interest. After completing the delivery of the pipes, FPFC demanded payment of the remaining balance and interest. When NAWASA failed to pay the balance of its account, the FPFC filed a collection suit on March 16, 1967. Trial Court Ruling (Nov. 23, 1967): Ordered the defendant to pay the unpaid balance of P135, 507.50 in NAWASA negotiable bonds, redeemable after ten years from their issuance with interest at 6% per annum, P40, 944.73 as interest up to March 15, 1966 and the interest accruing thereafter to the issuance of the bonds at 6% per annum and the costs. Defendant, however, failed to satisfy the decision. FPFC filed another complaint seeking adjustment of the unpaid balance in accordance with the value of the Philippine peso. NAWASA filed a motion to dismiss on ground of prior judgment but was denied by the trial court. Issue: (1) Whether the economic conditions then, and still prevailing, would justify the application of Article 1250 of the Civil Code (2)Whether, on the basis of the continously spiralling[sic] price index indisputably shown by the plaintiff, there exists an extraordinary inflation of the currency justifying an adjustment of NAWASA s unpaid judgment obligation to the FPFC. Ruling: (1) There is no denying that the price index of commodities, which is the usual evidence of the value of the currency has been rising. The trial court pointed out, however, than this is a worldwide occurence, but hardly proof that the inflation is extraordinary in the sense contemplated by Article 1250 of the Civil Code, which was adopted by the Code Commission to provide "a just solution" to the "uncertainty and confusion as a result of Malabanan contracts entered into or payments made during the last war." (Report of the Code Commission, 132-133.) (2) Extraordinary inflation exists "when there is a decrease or increase in the purchasing power of the Philippine currency which is unusual or beyond the common fluctuation in the value said currency, and such decrease or increase could not have reasonably foreseen or was manifestly beyond contemplation the the parties at the time of the establishment of the obligation. (Tolentino Commentaries and Jurisprudence on the Civil Code Vol. IV, p. 284.) While appellant's voluminous records and statistics proved that there has been a decline in the purchasing power of the Philippine peso, this downward fall of the currency cannot be considered "extraordinary." It is simply a universal trend that has not spared our country.

    Article 1250 of the Civil Code provides: In case an extraordinary inflation or deflation of the currency stipulated should supervene, the value of the currency at the time of the establishment of the obligation shall be the basis of payment, unless there is an agreement to the contrary..

    You might also like