Modern Chess Analysis Robin Smith 2024 Scribd Download
Modern Chess Analysis Robin Smith 2024 Scribd Download
https://ebookgate.com
https://ebookgate.com/product/modern-chess-
analysis-robin-smith/
https://ebookgate.com/product/robin-hood-1st-edition-neil-smith/
ebookgate.com
https://ebookgate.com/product/instructive-modern-chess-masterpieces-
igor-stohl/
ebookgate.com
https://ebookgate.com/product/geotechnical-slope-analysis-1st-edition-
robin-chowdhury/
ebookgate.com
https://ebookgate.com/product/chemical-process-design-and-
integration-2nd-edition-robin-m-smith/
ebookgate.com
The Modern Chess Problem 3rd Edition Philip Hamilton
Williams
https://ebookgate.com/product/the-modern-chess-problem-3rd-edition-
philip-hamilton-williams/
ebookgate.com
https://ebookgate.com/product/starting-out-modern-benoni-starting-out-
everyman-chess-1st-edition-endre-vegh/
ebookgate.com
https://ebookgate.com/product/handbook-of-forensic-drug-analysis-1st-
edition-fred-smith/
ebookgate.com
https://ebookgate.com/product/u-s-chess-federation-s-official-rules-
of-chess-6th-edition-u-s-chess-federation/
ebookgate.com
https://ebookgate.com/product/sensing-the-sacred-in-medieval-and-
early-modern-culture-1st-edition-edited-by-robin-macdonald/
ebookgate.com
Modern Chess Analysis
'Robin Smith
@Ali~IBIIT/
First published in the UK by Gambit Publications Ltd 2004
The right of Robin Smith to be identified as the author of this work has been asserted in accordance
with the Copyright, Designs and Parents Act I 988. ·
All rights reserved. This book is sold subject to the condition that it shall not, by way of trade or
otherwise, be lent, re-sold, hired our or otherwise circulated in any fonn of binding or cover other
than that in which it is published and without a similar condition including this condition being im-
posed on the subsequent purchaser.
A copy of the British Library Cataloguing in Publication data is available from the British Library.
ISBN I 904600 08 5
DISTRIBUTION:
Worldwide (except USA): Central Books Ltd, 99 Wallis Rd, London E9 5LN.
Tel +44 (0)20 8986 4854 Fax +44 (0)20 8533 5$21.E-mail:[email protected]
USA: BHB lntematio,1al, Inc., 302 West North 2nd Street, Senec°' SC 29678, USA.
For all other enquiries (including a full list of all Gambit chess titles) please contact the publishers,
Gambit Publications Ltd, P.O. Box 32640, London Wl4 OJN. E-mail: [email protected]
Or visit the GAMBIT w~b site at http://www.gambitbooks.com
10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 I
Symbols 5
Dedication 5
Acknowledgements 5
Introduction 6
Why Analysis? 7
General Information about Computers and Chess Programs 8
Buying a Computer for Chess Analysis 9
Which Chess Program Should I Get? 10
General Comments on Chess Program Algorithms 10
3 Opening Analysis 64
Game Database Statistics 64
MODERN CHESS ANALYSIS
Annotated Games 65
Using the Bookup Program 67
4 Middlegame Analysis 70
Deep Tactics and Highly Forcing Lines 70
Outposts, Weak Squares, Targets, Passed Pawns and Other Positional Features 72
Positional Sacrifices 79
Prisons 81
~~ ~
King Hunts and 'King Drift' 93
The Problem of Exchanging 104
Material Imbalances l 06
Quiet Manoeuvring 106
Critical Positions 113
+ che.:k
++ double check
# che.:klllate
x capture
!! brillianl move
good move
l? interesting move
7! dubious move
? bad move
?? blunder
+- White has a won position
± White is much better
;!;; White is slightly better
= the game is equal (or drawn)
'j: Black is slightly better
+ Black is much better
--+ Black has a won position
"' the position is unclear
D the 'only move'; all other moves are bad
Ch championship
Corr. correspondence game
ICCF International Correspondence Chess Federation
1-0 the game ends a win for White
'h-'h the game ends a draw
0-1 the game ends a win for Black
(n) nth match game
(D) see next diagram
Dedication
To my daughters, Eva and Danielle. Your enthusiasm was my inspiration.
Acknowledgements
Many thanks to Graham Burgess and John Nunn, for their invaluable suggestions, and to the
chess programmers and other posters at the Computer Chess Club Internet bulletin board
(http://www.icdchess.com) for the numerous insights into chess programs I gleaned by reading
there.
Introduction
"Computers are incredibly fast, accurate and the Spaniard Lucena in 1497, is another matter,
stupid; humans are incredibly slow, inaccurate containing analysis of several openings still
and brilliant; together they are powerful beyond played today. However, it should be noted that
imagination." 1 the common l:i+i\ vs l:r ending bearing Lu-
cena's name was not actually given until more
Chess analysis is nearly as old as the game it~ than 100 years after Lucena's death, by Salvio
self. The fust theorists of the game were proba- in 1634. The Gottingen Manuscript, a Latin
bly the Arabs, who had themselves adopted the document of 33 pages containing analysis of
game from the Persians. Without a notation openings and chess problems, also believed to
system for recording moves, analysis is hardly have been written by Lucena around 1490, in-
possible, and it was the Arabs who introduced cluded limited analysis of the Giuoco Piano,
the algebraic system of notation, long before also known as the 'Italian Opening' or 'Quiet
modem rules of castling, and before modem rule Game' and the Ruy Lopez.
changes expanded the power of many pieces. Later Pedro Damiano's book Questa libro e
Early manuscripts, prior to the invention of da impare giocare a scachi et de le partite, first
the printing press, were very limited in circula- published in 1512, was a big success, with eight
tion. Many involved analysis of endgames and, editions in several languages over a period of 50
in the words of Murray's A History of Chess: years. Next Spain took the lead in chess develop-
"The endgame is certainly the principal feature ment and analysis, with Ruy Lopez publishing
in all the early literature of chess, both in his book, Libro de lo i,n,encion liberal y arte de/
Muslim lands and in Europe .... These endgame juegode/ Axedrez in 1561, in which among other
positions are called in Arabic 'mansuba' ... in things he claimed that after the moves l e4 e5 2
modem chess language, a 'problem"'. li:lf3 li:lc6 3 i.b5, White has a good game. Of
The game of chess as it exists today first course, this opening remains highly popular to-
started to emerge in southern Europe toward day, and still bears his name, the 'Ruy Lopez', in
the end of the 15th and beginning of the 16th English-speaking countries, as well as the name
century. People such as Ruy Lopez, Damiano 'Spanish Game' in much of the rest of the world.
and Lucena also wrote the first printed (and While the Ruy Lopez had already been men-
thus more widely available) books around this tioned in the Gottingen manuscript, Lopez was
same time. The first printed book on chess was the frrst to treat this opening systematically.
William Caxton's 1476 translation from French, Chess analysis, theory, and knowledge have
The Game and Playe of rhe Chesse (only the continued to advance ever since, with analysts
second book ever to be printed in English, and building upon the knowledge of those who
the first printed book to use woodcut illustra- went before, using methods that have changed
tions!). While it did not apparently contain little since these earlier times. That is until now.
analysis, it did help standardize the rules of Modern personal computers, and the pawerful
play for a while, as well as pave the way for fu- chess software available for them, are having a
ture chess authors and analysts. Repeticion by profound effect on chess analysis and theory.
Anonymous. This quote has been attributed to Albert Einstein. Given the state of computation in Ein-
stein's day and the fact that Einstein quotes are more common than Elvis sightings, I find this attribu-
tion high! y suspect. However, it sums up the spirit of this book perfectly.
INTRODUCTION 7
Only a few short years ago, strong grandmas- with a computer, the program will catch any
ters paid Jittle attention to computers) generally short-term tactical analytical errors; however,
seeing them as interesting curiosities perhaps, the human must still do his/her part. and catch
but certainly computers could not understand the computer's errors. Only when the human
chess, nor could they be of much use as re.- analyst knows what to look for, can he hope to
search or analysis tools. Today it is hard to find do this diligently.
a grandmaster who is not using one. Yet there While many chess books, particularly those
has not previously been a book devoted exclu- about analysis, contain reams of analytical lines
sively to using a computer for chess analysis. with sub, sub, sub variations nested 10 or more
This book will show you many techniques deep, the reader will find this book on analysis
for using a computer to aid you in your chess contains relatively few concrete variations. The
analysis and to help you improve your game. It intent is to teach how, using the aid of a com-
is intended for players of all levels, from rela- puter, to generate your own analysis, not how to
tive beginners to top grandmasters. Like any follow someone else's. Many readers will be
other powerful tool, there are many ways to use able to get a great deal out of reading without
computers very effectively. and just as many the necessity of using a chessboard to follow
ways for computers to lead you astray. I intend the variations at all, while perhaps the best
to help you tell the difference. Moreover, while way to read will not be with a set and board but
the field of computers and computer chess is by following along with your favourite chess
changing at a breakneck pace, and many previ- program.
ou~ books about computer chess have quickly
become dated, the general analysis methods
and techniques that will be taught, as well as Why Analysis?
the inherent and fundamentally different way
people and computers 'think' about chess, are "Chess is the art of analysis."'
changing much less rapidly. The tool keeps get-
ting stronger, but the ideas and metl,ods remain There are many reasons why chess-players may
much lhe same. The goal of this book is to cover want to use chess engines (a chess engine is that
these ideas and methods, and for !his book to portion of a chess program that contains the
retain its relevance for many years to come. chess knowledge and performs the chess calcu-
In the course of this book, I will offer a num- lations - the 'brains' of a chess program) to as-
ber of examples and discuss how well a variety sist with analysis. For starters, a chess engine
of chess programs understand the positions can be a great aid in helping someone improve
involved. A majority of the examples I use will his or her game. It has often been noted !hat the
be cases where programs have more difficulty best way for someone to improve is by review-
than their human counterpat1s. I do this not ing games they have already played to find any
with the intent of implying !hat computers don't mistakes or possible improvements. By care-
understand most chess positions. Far from it. fully going over one's games using a chess en-
Most of the time modern programs do remark- gine, one can quickly spot blunders, as well as
ably well. Recent matches between computer alternative move choices.
programs and the top human GMs tend to con- Playing through the games of grandmasters
firm that under most conditions the chess pro- is also a time-tested means of improving one's
grams understand chess about as well as the game. However, what often happens is that
world's best players. However, there are still the student of these games is left wondering,
numerous cases where programs do less well, "why not 27 ltlg5?". Chess-engine assistance
and will most likely continue to struggle for can quickly spot obvious refutations of such
many years. For the human analyst working questions, and often less obvious ones as well.
I Mikhail B01vinnik
MODERN CHESS ANALYSIS
Anyone who has annotated a chess game in side. Many people tend to treat chess computers
recent times undoubted Iy knows how useful the as some kind of infallible oracle. They will plug
assistance of computers can be when engaged a particular position into the computer and wait
in such a task. Again, the computer quickly for it to spit out 'the answer'. The 1rouble is that
spots the obvious errors, and it can usually also computer programs, while incredii:,ly powerful
help with those questions that are more diffi- and becoming more powerful every year, still
cult. have weaknesses. lt is very dangerous to turn
For opening preparation, computers are al- off your brain and just tum a position you want
most indispensable. Tens of thousands of high- analysed over to a computer program. Much
level chess games are played each year. No one better is to work with the computer and to-
has the time to play over, or even sort through, gether make the most accurate analysis possi-
every single game. However, with the advent ble.
of computers, games databases and powerful
search routines, everyone can quickly find the
newest and most relevant games for keeping General Information
their own opening repertoire up-to-date. about Computers and
Analysis is at the heart of correspondence
chess and in top-level correspondence play Chess Programs
computers are everywhere'. Very rare these
days is a top-level correspondence player who Before we dig into the main material of this
does not use computers, including chess en- book, how to use computers to assist with
gines, in some fashion or another. Usually the many different types of chess analysis, it is im-
winner of correspondence garnes is the one portant first to point out a few things about
who makes the best use of all available re- computers and chess programs in general, as
sources to find the best possible moves. Re- well as 10 outline what this book does not in-
search using chess reference books has long tend to cover.
been the domain of correspondence players Every program has a different user inter-
and now, whether we like it or not, the research face, each with different features and different
tools available have been extended to include jnstructions on how to use those features. In
use of computers. addition, these features are constantly chang-
Of course, there are numerous other reasons ing. It is not the intent of this book to provide
for computer-assisted chess analysis: playing instructions on exactly what buttons to push to
over GM games just for the challenge and en- make your program(s) do what you wane Each
joyment of trying to spot the errors almost ev- program should have come with instructions
ery game has; testing out a new opening idea; on how to operate the program, or have built-
preparing for a game against a particular oppo- in help files that describe the program's opera-
nent; practising endgame technique; assisting tion. Rather than providing detailed descrip-
with chess coaching; analysing an adjourned tions of how to operate your program, which
game (if you still have these); preparing a chess should be adequately documented elsewhere,
book or article for publication; and undoubt- this book intends to show you how to use those
edly others. features common to most chess programs to
In all these endeavours, computers can be an obtain maximum benefit when performing
invaluable analysis aid. They also have a dark analysis.
Note that the International Correspondence Chess Federation, or ICCF, does not prohibit the use of
chess analysis engines in correspondence play for the simple reason that such a ban could not be enR
forced. This reality has caused some co1Tespondence players to give up rhe game. However, if there
were such a ban, only those players following the rules would be penalized, by not having access to a
powerful tool that is available to their opponents.
INTRODUCTION 9
of any such position, people often think thal Crafty, Ruffian, Yace, etc., are all excellent.
tablebases provide a huge boost in playing Likewise, database programs such as ChessBase
strength to computers. In fact, any increase in and Chess Assisllllll are outstanding as well.
strength is tiny. The only time tablebases be- Program features are constantly being improved
come critical is in the very late stages of the and the engines are constantly getting stronger;
endgame. In addition, the hard disk size you so whatever I might .recommend now might not
need to hold these databases is enormous. All be what l would recommend six months from
of the five-piece endings take a whopping 9 GB now. When you are ready to make your pur-
of hard-disk storage, and the six-piece table- chase(s), read some reviews, perhaps check out
bases will take vastly more than this (most esti- the ratings of various programs at the SSDF
mates are that when all six-piece endings are program rating website', and select the pro-
completed it will require more than 1,000 GB, gram(s) you think best suits your needs. Most
one terabyte, to hold all these endings). Al- of the methods I will be describing to you in
though these databases contain perfect play in- this book can be used with all of them. Just be
fonnation~ the information comes at a price. It sure that you can run multiple chess engines. If
is far too much data to hold in the RAM of a you limit yourself to one engine, your analysis
computer and must be accessed from the (rela- options will be dramatically limited. For this
tively slow) hard drive. The infonnalion con- reason, I personally prefer ChessBase pro-
tained is perfect, but accessing it slows down grams. Far more top-strength engines can run
the search! The bottom line is that while they from within ChessBase interface's than any
probably do improve play somewhal, the effect other.
is small and if you do not have tahlebases on
your computer, don't worry about it. It won't General Comments on Chess
usually make much difference. That is unless
you are analysing very late endgame positions,
Program Algorithms
in which case for top-level analysis, tablebases A chess program's chess engine, while highly
become essential. If you do plan to do a lot of sophisticated, complex, and consisting of nu~
late endgame analysis, and you have a lot of merous interrelated sub-routines, can be con-
money to spend, then you might even want to ceptually simplified by thinking of ii as being
consider getting a 10,000 or even a 15,000 composed of two main sections; search and
RPM hard drive. Since these will access the )l(lsition evaluation. Search can be thought of
tablebase data much faster than the more com- as those parts of a program I.hat detennine
mon 5,400 or 7,200 RPM hard drives, it will which lines to extend (search more deeply) and
have the added bonus of also using your CPU at which lines to prune (not search any more).
closer to !00% and the speed penalty for using Evaluation, on the other hand, is how the pro-
tablebases will be reduced. gram evaluates those positions it comes across
at the ends of each line it searches. Most pro-
Which Chess Program Should I Get? grams don't directly evaluate the position on
the board at all. They generate a search, and
Many people want to know which chess pro- then evaluate the positions that arise out of that
gram is the 'best'. The truth is, there are so search, backing up best play on both sides to
many excellent programs of nearly equal see what the starting position's evaluation is, In
strength and similar features I.hat the question computer chess jargon, the analogy of a 'search
truly cannot be answered. The commercial pro- tree' is used; 'branches' are all the various lines
grams ChessMaster, Chess Tiger, Fritz, Hiarcs, that are searched, while the 'leaves' are the end
Junior, Rebel, Shredder, and others, as well as a positions of each branch, which are then evalu-
large number of freeware programs such as ated by a program's evaluation function. Search
is about which branches to extend or prune, position to be. A score of 0.00 would be dead
while evaluation has to do with the conclusion even. +LOO would mean White (or for some
a program reaches regarding each leaf position. programs, the side to move) is a pawn up, or its
In any particular position, chess programs equivalent in positional factors. This numerical
give their position evaluation as a numerical . score is then used by the programs to decide
score, typically in units of pawns, which repre- which lines (branches) to extend or prune, and
sent how good or bad they evaluate a particular ultimately to decide what move to make.
1 Relative Strengths of Computers
versus Humans (and resulting
implications for computer-aided
analysis)
the computer's search horizon. And somewhat 25 .. .J:hh2!, which forces checkmate in lO
surprisingly, there still are quite a number of moves~ in a second or even less!
things that fall outside a computer's search ho-
riwn, and will most likely continue to fall out- While all programs are better than people at
side it for some years to come. solving mate in N problems (within their hori-
However, let's talk about what computers zon). not all programs are equal in tl1is area.
can calculate, and calculate very well. First Chess programs do a search through possible
and foremost is checkmate. Computers can find future positions, and just like humans, they
mates in 5, 6, 7 .. . sometimes even IO. 11 or must decide which lines to extend and which
more moves, with blinding speed. With the ex- ones not to, or even which they will prune
ception of just a few programs, and then only completely. Each program handles extensions
when analysing uncommon positions, comput- and pruning somewhat differently. All top pro~
ers can calculate mate in N problems so fast grams do what is called a 'quiescence' search.
your head will spin. They do so much more After the main search of a particular line (or
quickly and much more accurately than even branch) of the 'search tree' is completed. pro-
the very strongest of people. Ironically, this grams look at the resulting position to see if it is
strength is the complement of one of the com- 'quiet'. For computer chess purposes, a quiet
puter's major weaknesses, the gradual king at- position is typically one where there are no re-
tack build-up, which we will cover later. When captures possible, no one is in check, and no
it comes to direct attach against the king, a pawns are close to promotion. In these quiet po-
computer is a bit like a bloodhound. Before it sitions (which may not be quiet at all, from a
catches the scent (or in computer chess terms, human perspective), after the main search is
outside the computer's search horizon), the over, the computer stops searching this branch.
computer may have no clue about the impend- But what if the position isn't quiet? In such
ing danger. Like bloodhounds without a scent, cases, programs extend their search, to look
programs may wander around a bit aimlessly. deeper into the position. And each program
However. let them get a whiff of their quarry, extends the search differently. In the case of
and off they go, relentless in their pursuit of the checkmate, how a program extends those lines
enemy king. involving check is often highly relevant. A pro-
gram that aggressively extends checking lines
will tend to find checkmates faster than one that
extends checking lines less aggressively. Of
course, the price the program pays is that it
spends less time looking at other lines. and if
the checks are not relevant to what ultimately
turns out to be the strongest line (for example
when no forced mate is found) that search time
can end up wasted and the program weakened.
Because of its design choices. the widely avail-
able and popular program ChessMaster is no-
toriously fast at finding checkmates~ and can
often find them several hundred times faster
than other programs that are a bit stronger in
other types of positions.
Przepiorka - W. Cohn Besides checkmate, computers are excep-
Berlin 1907 tionally good at calculating material or other
gains that can be found within their search hori-
Clearly Black is much better. But how bad is zon. If 1here is the win of a piece within four or
it really? Most computer programs can find five moves, the programs will almost invariably
14 MODERN CHESS ANALYSIS
find it. If there is the forced promotion of a that would have been weaker if left undoubled,
pawn within four or five moves, again the pro- all because within their search horizon they
grams will almost always find it. Double at- cannot find a reason to think such an exchange
tacks, discovered attacks, forks, skewers, etc., is had. And even if they do decide that such a
are an seen nearly instantly. Let's look at an- material-winning exchange is bad, ~hey won't
other example: ever miss the possibility of doing so, if it is
within their search horizon.
Lastly, the ultimate in computer calculation,
endgame databases, also known as endgame
tablebases in computer chess circles. Table-
bases are (typically very large to huge file size)
databases of pre-computed endgame positions,
along with information about whether the posi-
tion is won or drawn ( and if won, Jn how many
moves). Computers can play positions that are
in these databases both perfectly and instantly.
No grandmaster on earth could play these posi-
tions as well. And God could do no better.
Still, there are some significant limits on
tablebases. Al the time of writing, the maxi-
mum number of pieces for which all tahlebase
Vladimirov - Epishin positions have been calculated is five, including
Tashkent J987 both kings'. So positions such as Icing, queen
and pawn versus Icing and queen can be played
Black has just captured White's queen on b3. perfectly. But add a second pawn and it is no
So what is the reply? longer a 5-piece tablebase position and perfect
26 i.h6!! play is no longer available to the computers
Many programs will find this remarkable without access to 6-piece tablebases. Because
move in a fraction of a second, and most find it of this severe limitation on the number of pieces,
in no more than a few seconds. in the early days of tablebases, they had very
26.../Zlg4 27 l:!.h7+ 1Zlxh6 28 l:txh8+ Wxf7 little impact on a program's strength. Such re-
29 l:!.h7+ 1-0 duced material oonfigurations do not occur with
enough frequency to make a great deal of dif-
What is less well known is that computers ference, and when they did occur, the programs
can be 'materialistic' for positional factors as could often work out the correct lines on their
well, and will usually find their encoded posi- own. However, in practical play, it is not always
tional factor gains, such as the doubling of enough to know how to win a certain five-piece
pawns, with equally lightning speed. Moreover, ending. You want to know if it is won, or not,
as in the case of king-hunts, this strength is also before exchanging into such a position in the
one of the oomputer's most notorious weak- first place. Several years ago, a new tablebase
nesses. While programmers have made great format was developed that allowed much faster
strides in this area, computers still tend to be access to the tablebase data. As a result, pro-
materialistic. They may allow exchange sacri- grams have now been developed which can ac-
fices that should be avoided, or double pawns cess this data from within the search, before
Some six-piece tablebases have already been calculated at the time of writing, and the remainder are
likely to be completed du1ing 2005. Because of the exponential nature of the computer resources re-
quired to calculate tablebases, it is highly unlikely that calculation of seven-piece endings will be
completed for many more years.
RELATIVE STRENGTHS OF COMPUTERS VERSUS HUMANS 15
7 .ixf6 is much better, but Black has already +-) 13 ... l2lxg4 14 hxg31Zld4 15 li'\c3 c6 16 a3
more than equalized. d5-+.
7,..gS 8 .ig3 (D) How well do computers do in the position
after White's move 8? Not very well. No mat-
ter which programs I have tried, nor how long
l have let them think, none has ever found
B 8...h5! !. Yet a man playing one and a half cen-
turies ago did find it, and subsequent analysis
bas proved that Black's idea is entirely sound.
This, in a position that is a tactical king-hunt ...
the kind of position that is supposed to be a
computer's forte, not a person's. How did
Steinitz manage this? First, the position has
some flags, which indicate there might be
something there.
Black's pieces are extraordinarily well co-
ordinated for attack. The pinned f2-pawn can-
not be easily freed. The h8-rook bears down
In this positi.on Steinitz played the incredible on the soon-to-be-opened h-file. Black also
and strong ... has a bishop on c8, which can develop to g4
8...hS!! with tempo, and a knight on c6, which can join
Not just an offer of the g5-pawn, but allow- in the attack in one move from d4. Finally
ing a fork on f7 and in the main line giving up there is Black's f6-knight, which from g4 can
Black's queen' Dubois declined the sacrifice. hit both f2 and h2.
But what would have happened had it been ac- Meanwhile White's pieces have been ar-
cepted? Uncredited analysis from ChessBase's ranged to pressure Black on f7, but nol to de-
Mega Database gives 91Zlxg5 h4 IO 1Zlxf7 hxg3, fend White's castled king. White's c4-bishop
and now: is cut off from any defence by the d3-pawn.
a) 11 !1:lxh& and here: White's g3-bishop has no escape-squares. And
al) 1L...ig4(?) 12 '1Wd2 1Zld4 is suggested White's queenside is undeveloped. All these
in Megabase, but then White has the strong re- flags undoubtedly alened Steinitz that there
ply 13 1Zlc3 \!We7 14 '!lih6 with a large advan- might be so1nething to look more deeply into.
tage. Next, all the lines are both very deep and
a2) l L.\!We7 121Zlf7 :lxf2+ 13l:lxf2 gxf2+ very narrow ( forcing), yet at the same time
14 @xf2 ltlg4+ 15 lilg3 'i!i'f6 16 'i'f3 'ill'g7 wins there are few checks in the main lines. When
for Black. the lines are narrow, humans can calculate
b) 11 itlxd8 il.g4! and then: quite deeply. For a computer searching for mate,
bl) 12 'i'd2 li'\d4 13 li'\c3 (13 h3 li'\e2+ 14 they can do phenomenally well when a mate is
lt>hl l:l.xh3+ 15 gxh3 il.f3# (0-1) Ashley- within their search horizon, but if the line is too
Tolitt, Birmingham 1923) 13 ... li'\f3+ 14 gxf3 deep, and especially if there are few checking
.ixf3 -+. moves (which would extend their horizon) the
b2) 121Zlxc6 gxf2+ 13 lilhl .axdl 14 :!i!.xdl computers sometimes don't search deep enough
/Zlg4 15 h3 li'\e3 also leads to a winning position to 'get the scent'.
for Black. Lastly, Steinitz's move was probably the re-
b3) 12 1Zlf7 .iih5? (12 ... :!i!.xh2f, not men- sult of home preparation. People do relatively
tioned in MegaBase, is better: 13 'i!Vel li'\d4 14 better with a lot of time to think. Computers
l1:ld21Zle2+ 15 'li'xe2 j_xe2 -+) 13 'i!l'xg4? (the wil1 also do better with more time., but are rela-
MegaBase annotator missed 13 'i'd2! itld4 14 tively stronger compared to people at faster
li'\c31Zlt3+ 15 gxf3 ..lxf3 16 h4 :!i!.xh4 17 \/ih6 time-controls.
RELATlVE STRENGTHS OF COMPUTERS VERSUS HUMANS 17
Mikhail Chigorin
2 Early in the histoty of computer chess, Mikhail Botvinnik worked on a chess program that auempted
to think schematically. However, time has demonstrated that computers perform better when taldng
advantage of their unique strengths, ra1her than trying to emulate the strengths of people.
18 MODERN CHESS ANALYSIS
Let's start with the doubled f-pawns. Dou- on the e-file and Black's total lack of piece
bled pawns are generally weak. and programs coordination.
will virtually always have some penalty built So Black can't win the f5-pawn quickly. But
into their evaluation function for the position what about longer term? Winning the f5-pawn
with doubled pawns. But is the f5-pawn really would still be exceedingly problematic. Black's
weak? Can it be easily captured? Is it even serv- bishop will never become a light-squared one,
ing a useful function? The answer to the last and his knights are unlikely to gravitate to g7 or
question is a resounding 'yes'. Black's e-pawn h6 without conceding too much in the centre or
is being restrained by the f5-pawn, preventing on the queenside, while other squares are gen-
Black from establishing a strong centre with his erally unavailable. That leaves only the rooks.
two central pawns. Black cannot safely advance It is possible that late in the game a rook will
the e-pawn without the f5-pawn capturing, se- gain access to c5 or f6, causing trouble. But this
verely weakening Black's kingside. Back to the is a long way off. And in the mean time, the f5-
second question, is the f5-pawn easily cap- pawn is strong, not weak! The above line of rea-
tured? With some schematic thinking, plus a soning is schematic thinking, and is vastly dif-
tiny amount of calculation, we can determine ferent from how a computer will look at the
that the answerto this is 'no'. As soon as Black same f5-pawn; "is it doubled? yes = weak",
attacks the f-pawn, White can play .ild3 to next move, '"is it doubled? yes = weak", etc.
protect it (or 'i!i'd3 if Black somehow manages This kind of thinking will continue, more or
to exchange off the bishop) and thus Black will less, until the end of the game.
need two pieces to attack f5 before he has any A similar analysis can be done on the relative
chance of capturing it safely. Black's queen safety of White's and Black's kings. In fact,
can very easily provide one of the pieces. from Whites king is very secure, since the g- and h-
either c8 or d7, but what about the second pawns have both been effectively immobilized.
piece? Black's dark-squared bishop is obvi- The g- and h-pawn storm is all show, no go.
ously no use at all, the rooks are still a very And to their credit, many programs will realize
long way from getting into play, and the king this. What they might not see is that contrary to
hardly wants to wander out into the open. That White's king being in jeopardy, it is Black's
only leaves one of the knights. From where king that has difficulties. Black can do three
might a black knight hit f5? The squares e7, things with his king: keep it in the centre, run
e3, g3 and h4 are all out (a knight's only rea- (or castle) to the queenside, or run (or castle) on
sonable route to h4 is first through f5). Equally the kingside. Each is problematic.
unpromising is the d4-square, since White can Keeping the king in the centre is not so
quickly control this square with llle2, c3 or much a problem for the black king, because
both. Getting to the d6-square would require White has no pawn-breaks in the centre, and
Black first to play ... d5, leaving the d-pawn e7 is easily defended. It is Black's king's rook
very weak. This leaves only g7 or h6. What if that will be a problem, since it will have great
Black tries the plan ...'!!l'd7, ... 0-0-0, ... .ilh6, difficulty getting into the game until Black's
.. .1Zle8, and .JJ',g7? That's five full moves be- king leaves e8. White will just commence op-
fore Black can gang up on the f5-pawn, during erations on the queenside, where Black would
which time White has too many possible coun- he forced to play effectively a rook down. If
ters to name them all. OK, so the best try might Black runs to the queenside, things aren't any
be ... 'l!i'd7, ... lllg8, and ... lllh6. How might the better, as White has pawns there to storm and
game progress? eventually break into Black's camp, while on
15 ... 'i!fd7 16 .;ld3 lllg8?l (Black's intentions the opposite side Black does not have any
are now crystal clear) I 7 llld5 J:lb8 (White was equivalent pawn-breaks. This leaves only the
threatening 18 lllb6, winning an exchange) 18 kingside, but here too Black will have diffi-
c3 tilh6?? (this logical follow-up just loses) 19 culty. For example, if Black were to castle im-
f6 ! and Black's position is a mess due to the pin mediately, White could reply 16 f3, after which
RELATIVE STRENGTHS OF COMPUTERS VERSUS HUMANS 19
Black's h5-pawn would fall and his king would moves, which the programs cannot see. In or-
be exposed. der for the bishop ever to move, the black b- or
So, using schematic thinking we can con- d-pawn must move first, and in order for these
clude that White has a significant advantage, al- to move, White's blockading pawns will have
though computers will most likely not see it, or . to be eliminated. But there are no safe ap-
if they do, will tend to undervalue White's ad- proaches to White's b- or d-pawn. The only
vantage. ls this pcsition unique? On the con- way to untie the noose is for Black to sacrifice
trary, positions such as this, where schematic material with ... il..c7, ... JJ..a7 or ... ll:a6, but these
thinking can add understanding above what a moves will leave Black both material down and
computer can see, are by far the norm, not the still much worse positionally. Black is hope-
exception. Sometimes the knowledge gap ad- lessly lost., yet many programs see approximate
vantage for humans using schematic thinking equality, because of their inability to think sche-
can even be comical. Take mis position: matically.
Computer programs evaluate pcsitions with
Smith - Brandhorst very simple evaluation functions. Any added
13th US Corr. Ch finals 1999-00 complexity slows them down, and a computer's
strength is its speed, so many things that pro-
l e4 e5 21Zlf3 /Zlc6 3 i.c4 i.c5 4 b4 .i.b6 5 a4 grammers could encode are intentionally left
a6 61Zlc3 1Zlf6 7 12:lds 1Zlxd5 S exd5 1Zld4 9 d6 out. This approach is fully justified since often
1/Vf6 100-01Zlxf3+ 11 'l\l'xf3 'i!!'xf3 12 gxf3 a5 their search is so fast, and so deep, that they
13 b5 cxd6 14 i.b2 g5 15 d4 f6 16 ll:fel h5 17 don't need a more complex evaluation, as has
liadl h4 18 i.a3 JJ..c7 19 h6 .tbs 20 d5 @dS been demonstrated repeatedly in practice. A
2lf4 (D) fast-searching program can often make surpris-
ingly strategic looking moves. But here is the
critical point: when a key feature of a position is
I) too complex to be easily encoded or too rare
to warrant being encoded into a program's eval-
uation, and 2) likely to continue to have an
influence beyond the search horizon of the
computer, then a human 's schematic thinking
will be superior to the computer's search for the
purpcses of long-range planning and positional
evaluation.
Positional Evaluation
Computer evaluation functions vs
1-0 human positional evaluation
A computer sees that Black has 'poor mobil-
ity' and tends to evaluate this as approximately 'The scheme of a game is played on positional
balancing out White's two-pawn deficit (after lines; the decision of it, as a rule, is effected by
Black captures on f4). Most programs seem to combinations."'
think tl1e position is about equal. Humans eval-
uate things quite differently! The c8-bishop not A critical skill needed by any chess analyst is po-
only has zero moves, which the programs can sitional understanding, the ability to evaluate po-
see, but it is unlikely that it will ever have any sitions. No matter how good one's calculation
I Richard Reti
20 MODERN CHESS ANALYSIS
abilities are, at some point you have to halt the such as certain immobilized pawn-formations.
analysis, look at the position, and assess what is And finally, people often do better than com-
going on. What are the relevant features of the puters in positions that are highly unbalanced.
position? What plans might make sense going such as where one side has sacrificed material
forward, and what are each player's chances to create a positional bind, becaus" people are
associated wilh each of those plans? Is the posi- better able co determine which of the unbal-
tion simple or complex? Who has the advan- anced features are most relevant.
tage? Is it even clear who has the advantage?
Both people and chess programs are capable of Gulko - Kaidanov
evaluating chess positions, but they each go USA Ch IKey West) 1994
about it in different ways, sometimes yielding
very different results. J c4 c6 2 e4 d5 3 exdS li:lf6 4 d4 cxd5 51Zlc3 e6
When a program evaluates a leaf position, it 6 li:lf3 Jt.e7 7 cxd5 .'t:lxd5 8 ..td3 li:lc6 9 0-0 0-0
considers many positional factors: material, 10 liel :lf6 11 a3 :ld7 12 -ill.c2 :!lc8 13 11:le4
mobility, king safety, pawn-stmcture, advanced :le7 14 '!illd3 g6 15 :ld2 '!!Vb6 16 b4 l!.fd8 17
pawns, control of open files, control of the cen- .tb3 ii.es 18 l!.acl a6 19 h4
tre, rooks on the 7th rank, the two bishops. etc. An excellent plan, which most programs of
Programs sometimes get a bad rap as being today don't choose. However, to be fair White
dunces wh~n it comes to positional evaluation. is already better and the various program ideas
For the programs of today, this is no longer true, might also be quite effective.
and in some situations programs can have a 19, ..llla7 20 li:lc5 .'t:lc6 21 h5 (D)
better evaluation than the supposedly superior
human experts. h all depends on the nature of
the position. If it is a position where a computer
does relatively well or where a human does rel-
atively well, the computer might excel at posi-
tion evaluation, be a dunce, or anywhere in
between.
Although computers may still have trouble
with some positions, they will evaluate (and
thus play!) relatively better than people in
messy, open positions, where several pawns are
already gone, and the remainder of the pieces
look like they were scattered on the board at
random. And they tend to do better when there
are dynamic, mobile pawn-structures. With the
advent of endgame tablebases, computers also GM Babmin, in his book Winning Pawn
excel at some endgames with extremely reduced Structures, states: "suggest this position to a
material (not always, though). If the main lines computer... and give it some time. You will
are unlikely to lead to exchanges into a five- probably see that the program assesses this po-
piece ending, computers can still struggle con- sition as roughly equal. Yet, in lnforma/or, GM
siderably with positions with as few as six Gulko assessed this position as winning for
pieces. White and I agree with him." Many program
By contrast, people generally evaluate best improvements have been made since 1998 when
in closed positions, often where no pawns have Baburin 's book was published. What do today's
been exchanged. People will also do relatively programs say? They all prefer White. I tried
better when there are long-term features to play Junior, Fritz, Chess Tiger, Shredder, Hiarcs,
against, but those features have not been en- ChessMaster, Rebel and the freeware engines
coded Into the program's evaluation functions. Crafty, Yace, and Ruffian. Most see at least 0.9
Another random document with
no related content on Scribd:
and his hands trembling, for many weird tales had been told of this
same Señor Zorro and his brutality, none of which was true.
"I am sure that you will pardon me," Señor Zorro said, "when I ask
you to sit at the far end of the room. As I take each bite, I must
raise the bottom of my mask, for I have no wish to become known. I
put the pistol before me on the table, so, to discourage treachery.
And now, Don Carlos Pulido, I shall do justice to the meal you have
furnished."
Don Carlos and his daughter sat where they had been directed, and
the bandit ate with evident relish. Now and then he stopped to talk
to them, and once he had Don Carlos send out for more wine,
declaring it to be the best he had tasted for a year.
Don Carlos was only too glad to oblige him. He was playing to gain
time. He knew the horse the native rode, and judged that he had
reached the presidio at Reina de Los Angeles before this, and that
the soldiers were on their way. If he could hold this Señor Zorro until
they arrived!
"I am having some food prepared for you to carry with you, señor,"
he said. "You will pardon me while I get it? My daughter will
entertain you."
Señor Zorro bowed, and Don Carlos hurried from the room. But Don
Carlos had made a mistake in his eagerness. It was an unusual thing
for a girl to be left alone in the company of a man in such fashion,
especially with a man known to be an outlaw. Señor Zorro guessed
at once that he was being delayed purposely. For, again, it was an
unusual thing for a man like Don Carlos to go for the package of
food himself when there were servants that could be called by a
mere clapping of the hands. Don Carlos, in fact, had gone into the
other room to listen at a window for sounds of galloping horses.
"Señor!" Lolita whispered across the room.
"What is it, señorita?"
"You must go—at once. I am afraid that my father has sent for the
soldiers."
"And you are kind enough to warn me?"
"Do I wish to see you taken here? Do I wish to see fighting and
bloodshed?" she asked.
"That is the only reason, señorita?"
"Will you not go, señor?"
"I am loath to rush away from such a charming presence, señorita.
May I come again at the next siesta hour?"
"By the saints—no! This must end, Señor Zorro! Go your way—and
take care! You have done some things that I admire, hence I would
not see you captured. Go north, as far as San Francisco de Asis, and
turn honest, señor. It is the better way."
"Little priest!" he said.
"Shall you go, señor?"
"But your father has gone to fetch food for me. And could I depart
without thanking him for this meal?"
Don Carlos came back into the room then, and Señor Zorro knew by
the expression on his face that the soldiers were coming up the trail.
The don put a package on the table.
"Some food to carry with you, señor," he said. "And we would relish
more of your reminiscences before you start on your perilous
journey."
"I have spoken too much of myself already, señor, and it ill becomes
a caballero to do that. It were better that I thank you and leave you
now."
"At least, señor, drink another mug of wine."
"I fear," said Señor Zorro, "that the soldiers are much too close, Don
Carlos."
The face of the don went white at that, for the highwayman was
picking up his pistol, and Don Carlos feared he was about to pay the
price for his treacherous hospitality. But Señor Zorro made no move
to fire.
"I forgive you this breach of hospitality, Don Carlos, because I am an
outlaw and there has been a price put upon my head," he said.
"And, also, I hold you no ill will because of it. Buenas noches,
señorita! Señor, á Dios!"
Then a terrified servant who knew little concerning the events of the
evening rushed in at the door.
"Master! The soldiers are here!" he cried. "They are surrounding the
house!"
CHAPTER IX
THE CLASH OF BLADES
Here was a fix! Don Carlos had no wish to anger Don Diego Vega or
a man who stood high in the governor's regard. And how was he to
evade it? If Lolita could not force her heart to accept Don Diego,
perhaps she could learn to love Captain Ramón. After Don Diego, he
was the best potential son-in-law in the vicinity.
"Your answer, señor?" the captain was asking.
"I trust you will not misunderstand me, señor," Don Carlos said, in
lower tones. "I must make a simple explanation."
"Proceed, señor."
"But this morning Don Diego Vega asked me the same question."
"Ha!"
"You know his blood and his family, señor. Could I refuse him? Of
rights I could not. But I may tell you this—the señorita weds no man
unless it is her wish. So Don Diego has my permission to pay his
addresses, but if he fails to touch her heart—"
"Then I may try?" the captain asked.
"You have my permission, señor. Of course, Don Diego has great
wealth, but you have a dashing way with you, and Don Diego—that
is—he is rather—"
"I understand perfectly, señor," the captain said, laughing. "He is not
exactly a brave and dashing caballero. Unless your daughter prefers
wealth to a genuine man—"
"My daughter will follow the dictates of her heart, señor!" Don Carlos
said proudly.
"Then the affair is between Don Diego Vega and myself?"
"So long as you use discretion, señor. I would have nothing happen
that would cause enmity between the Vega family and mine."
"Your interests shall be protected, Don Carlos," Captain Ramón
declared.
As Don Diego talked, the Señorita Lolita observed her father and
Captain Ramón, and guessed what was being said. It pleased her, of
course, that a dashing officer should enter the lists for her hand, and
yet she had felt no thrill when first she looked into his eyes.
Señor Zorro, now, had thrilled her to the tips of her tiny toes, and
merely because he had talked to her, and touched the palm of her
hand with his lips. If Don Diego Vega were only more like the
highwayman! If some man appeared who combined Vega's wealth
with the rogue's spirit and dash and courage!
There was a sudden tumult outside, and into the room strode the
soldiers, Sergeant Gonzales at their head. They saluted their captain,
and the big sergeant looked with wonder at his wounded shoulder.
"The rogue escaped us," Gonzales reported. "We followed him for a
distance of three miles or so, as he made his way into the hills,
where we came upon him."
"Well?" Ramón questioned.
"He has allies."
"What is this?"
"Fully ten men were waiting for him there, my captain. They set
upon us before we were aware of their presence. We fought them
well, and three of them we wounded, but they made their escape
and took their comrades with them. We had not been expecting a
band, of course, and so rode into their ambush."
"Then we have to contend with a band of them!" Captain Ramón
said. "Sergeant, you will select a score of men in the morning, and
have command over them. You will take the trail of this Señor Zorro,
and you will not stop until he is either captured or slain. I will add a
quarter's wages to the reward of his excellency, the governor, if you
are successful."
"Ha! It is what I have wished!" Sergeant Gonzales cried. "Now we
shall run this coyote to earth in short order! I shall show you the
color of his blood—"
"'Twould be no more than right, since he has seen the color of the
captain's," Don Diego put in.
"What is this, Don Diego, my friend? Captain, you have crossed
blades with the rogue?"
"I have," the captain assented. "You but followed a tricky horse, my
sergeant. The fellow was here, in a closet, and came out after I had
entered. So it must have been some other man you met with his
companions up in the hills. This Señor Zorro treated me much as he
treated you in the tavern—had a pistol handy in case I should prove
too expert with the blade."
Captain and sergeant looked at each other squarely, each wondering
how much the other had been lying; while Don Diego chuckled
faintly and tried to press the Señorita Lolita's hand, and failed.
"This thing can be settled only in blood!" Gonzales declared. "I shall
pursue the rascal until he is run to earth. I have permission to select
my men?"
"You may take any at the presidio," the captain said.
"Sergeant Gonzales, I should like to go with you," Don Diego said
suddenly.
"By the saints! It would kill you, caballero! Day and night in the
saddle, up hill and down hill, through dust and heat, and with a
chance at fighting!"
"Well, perhaps it were best for me to remain in the pueblo," Don
Diego admitted. "But he has annoyed this family, of which I am a
true friend. At least, you will keep me informed? You will tell me how
he escapes if he dodges you? I at least may know that you are on
his trail, and where you are riding, so I may be with you in spirit?"
"Certainly, caballero—certainly!" Sergeant Gonzales replied. "I shall
give you the chance of looking upon the rogue's dead face. I swear
it!"
"'Tis a terrible oath, my sergeant. Suppose it should come to pass—"
"I mean, if I slay the rascal, caballero. My captain, do you return this
night to the presidio?"
"Yes," Ramón replied. "Despite my wound, I can ride a horse."
He glanced toward Don Diego as he spoke, and there was almost a
sneer upon his lips.
"What magnificent grit!" Don Diego said. "I, too, shall return to
Reina de Los Angeles, if Don Carlos will be as good as to have his
carriage around. I can tie my horse to the rear of it. To ride
horseback the distance again this day would be the death of me!"
Gonzales laughed and led the way from the house. Captain Ramón
paid his respects to the ladies, glowered at Don Diego, and followed.
The caballero faced Señorita Lolita again as her parents escorted the
captain to the door.
"You will think of the matter?" he asked. "My father will be at me
again within a few days, and I shall escape censure if I am able to
tell him that it is all settled. If you decide to wed me, have your
father send me word by a servant. Then I shall put my house in
order against the wedding day."
"I shall think of it," the girl said.
"We could be married at the mission of San Gabriel, only we should
have to make the confounded journey there. Fray Felipe, of the
mission, has been my friend from the days of my boyhood, and I
would have him say the words, unless you prefer otherwise. He
could come to Reina de Los Angeles and read the ceremony in the
little church on the plaza there."
"I shall think of it," the girl said again.
"Perhaps I may come out again to see you within a few days, if I
survive this night. Buenas noches, señorita! I suppose I should—er—
kiss your hand?"
"You need not take the trouble," Señorita Lolita replied. "It might
fatigue you."
"Ah—thank you! You are thoughtful, I see. I am fortunate if I get me
a thoughtful wife."
Don Diego sauntered to the door. Señorita Lolita rushed into her
own room and beat at her breasts with her hands, and tore at her
hair a bit, too angry, too enraged to weep. Kiss her hand, indeed!
Señor Zorro had not suggested it—he had done it. Señor Zorro had
dared death to visit her! Señor Zorro had laughed as he fought, and
then had escaped by a trick! Ah, if Don Diego Vega were half the
man this highwayman appeared!
She heard the soldiers gallop away, and after a little time she heard
Don Diego Vega depart in her father's carriage. And then she went
out into the great room again to her parents.
"My father, it is impossible that I wed with Don Diego Vega," she
said.
"What has caused your decision, my daughter?"
"I scarcely can tell, except that he is not the sort of man I wish for
my husband. He is lifeless; existence with him would be a continual
torment."
"Captain Ramón also has asked permission to pay you his
addresses," Doña Catalina said.
"And he is almost as bad. I do not like the look in his eyes," the girl
replied.
"You are too particular," Don Carlos told her. "If the persecution
continues another year we shall be beggars. Here is the best catch
in the country seeking you, and you would refuse him. And you do
not like a high army officer because you do not fancy the look in his
eyes!
"Think on it, girl! An alliance with Don Diego Vega is much to be
desired. Perhaps, when you know him better, you will like him more.
And the man may awaken. I thought I saw a flash of it this night,
deemed him jealous because of the presence of the captain here. If
you can arouse his jealousy—"
Señorita Lolita burst into tears, but soon the tempest of weeping
passed, and she dried her eyes.
"I—I shall do my best to like him," she said. "But I cannot bring
myself to say, yet, that I will be his wife."
She hurried into her room again, and called for the native woman
who attended her. Soon the house was in darkness, and the grounds
about it, save for the fires down by the adobe huts, where the
natives told one another grim tales of the night's events, each trying
to make his falsehood the greatest. A gentle snore came from the
apartment of Don Carlos Pulido and his wife.
But the Señorita Lolita did not slumber. She had her head propped
on one hand, and she was looking through a window at the fires in
the distance, and her mind was full of thoughts of Señor Zorro.
She remembered the grace of his bow, the music of his deep voice,
the touch of his lips upon her palm.
"I would he were not a rogue!" she sighed. "How a woman could
love such a man!"
CHAPTER XII
A VISIT
Don Carlos read that epistle aloud to his wife and daughter, and then
looked up to see how they took it. He scoffed at the danger himself,
being an old war-horse, but did not wish to put his womenfolk in
jeopardy.
"What think you?" he asked.
"It has been some time since we have visited the pueblo," Doña
Catalina said. "I have some friends left among the ladies there. I
think it will be an excellent thing to do."
"It certainly will not injure our fortunes to have it become known we
are house guests of Don Diego Vega," Don Carlos said. "What does
our daughter think?"
It was a concession to ask her, and Lolita realized that she was
granted this unusual favor because of Don Diego's wooing. She
hesitated some time before answering.
"I believe it will be all right," she said. "I should like to visit the
pueblo, for we see scarcely anybody here at the hacienda. But
people may talk concerning Don Diego and myself."
"Nonsense!" Don Carlos exploded. "Could there be anything more
natural than that we should visit the Vegas, since our blood is almost
as good as theirs and better than that of others?"
"But it is Don Diego's house, and not that of his father. Still—he will
not be there for two or three days, he says, and we can return when
he comes."
"Then it is settled!" Don Carlos declared. "I shall see my
superintendent and give him instructions."
He hurried into the patio and rang the big bell for the
superintendent, being well pleased. For when the Señorita Lolita saw
the rich furnishings in the house of Don Diego Vega, she might the
more readily accept Don Diego as a husband, he thought. When she
saw the silks and satins, the elegant tapestries, the furniture inlaid
with gold and studded with precious stones, when she realized that
she could be mistress of this and much more besides—Don Carlos
flattered himself that he knew the feminine heart.
Soon after the siesta hour, a carreta was brought before the door,
drawn by mules and driven by a native. Doña Catalina and Lolita got
into it, and Don Carlos bestrode his best horse and rode at its side.
And so they went down the trail to the highway, and down the
highway toward Reina de Los Angeles.
They passed folk who marveled to see the Pulido family thus going
abroad, for it was well known that they had met with ill fortune and
scarcely went anywhere now. It was even whispered that the ladies
did not keep up with the fashions, and that the servants were poorly
fed, but remained at the hacienda because their master was so kind.
But Doña Catalina and her daughter held their heads proudly, as did
Don Carlos, and they greeted the people they knew, and so
continued along the highway.
Presently they made a turning and could see the pueblo in the
distance—the plaza, and the church with its high cross on one side
of it, and the inn and storehouses, and a few residences of the more
pretentious sort, like Don Diego's, and the scattered huts of natives
and poor folk.