0% found this document useful (0 votes)
13 views24 pages

Chapter 16

Uploaded by

tom71219
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
13 views24 pages

Chapter 16

Uploaded by

tom71219
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 24

Acct 361

Cost Allocation:
Joint Products
Joint Cost Terminology
 Joint Costs – costs of a single production
process that yields multiple products
simultaneously
 Splitoff Point – the place in a joint production
process where two or more products become
separately identifiable
 Separable Costs – all costs incurred beyond
the splitoff point that are assignable to each of
the now-identifiable specific products
What is a Joint Product?

 Joint Products
• Outputs of a joint production process that
yields two or more products with a high sales
value compared to the sales values of any
other outputs
• But are not separately identifiable as individual
products until after the split-off point
Joint-Cost Example

Raw milk

Cream Liquid Skim


Industries Incurring Joint Costs
Reasons for Allocating Joint Costs

 Required for GAAP and taxation purposes


 Computation of inventoriable costs and cost of
goods sold for financial accounting and tax reporting
 Internal analysis of divisional profitability
 Cost-based contracting
 Insurance settlements
 Required for rate and price regulations
 Litigation
Joint Cost Allocation Methods
 Market-Based – allocate using market-
derived data (dollars):
1. Sales value at splitoff
2. Net Realizable Value (NRV)
3. Constant Gross-Margin percentage NRV
• Physical Measures – allocate using
tangible attributes of the products, such
as pounds, gallons, barrels, etc.
Joint Cost — Illustration
Overview
Joint Cost — Illustration Data
blank Joint Costs blank
Joint costs (costs of 4,400 hL
of raw milk and processing to
splitoff point) $ 345,000 blank
blank Cream Liquid Skim
Beginning inventory (hectolitres) 0 0
Production (hL) 1,000 3,000
Sales (hL) 800 900
Ending inventory (hL) 200 2,100
Selling price per hL $155.00 $75.00
Physical Measure Method

 Allocates joint costs on the basis of their relative


proportions at the splitoff point
• Using a common physical measure such as
weight or volume
 Less desirable as physical allocation measure has
no relationship to revenue-producing power of the
individual products
 Can be problematic if no common physical measure
is available
Physical Measure — Example
blank Cream Skim Total
Physical Measure of Production 1,000 3,000 4,000
Weighting 0.25 0.75 blank
Joint Costs Allocated: blank blank blank
Joint Cost X Weighting $ 86,250 $ 258,750 $ 345,000
Joint production cost per hL $ 86.25 $ 86.25 blank
Sales Value at Splitoff Method
 Uses the sales value of the entire
production in the accounting period to
calculate allocation percentage
• Costs are allocated to products in proportion
to their revenue-generating power
• Consistent with the benefits-received criterion
of cost allocation
 Ignores inventories
Sales Value at Splitoff —
Example
blank Cream Skim Total
Sales Value of Production blank blank blank
Cream: 1,000 hL@ $155/hL $ 155,000 blank blank
Skim: 3,000 hL@ $75/hL blank $ 225,000 blank
Total blank blank $ 380,000
Allocation Based on % of Total Sales (rounded) 40.79% 59.21% blank
Joint Costs Allocated: blank blank blank
Joint Cost X Allocation % $ 140,724 $ 204,276 $ 345,000
Joint production cost per hL $ 140.72 $ 68.09 blank
Net Realizable Value Method
 Allocates joint costs on the basis of relative
estimated net realizable value (NRV) of total
production of the joint products
• Expected sales value less expected
separable costs of production and
marketing of total production
NRV = Final Sales Value – Separable Costs
 An alternative when selling prices of one or
more products at splitoff do not exist
Exhibit 16-6
NRV — Example
blank Condensed
Buttercream Milk Total
Final Sales Value of Production blank blank blank
Buttercream: 800 hL@ $420/hL $ 336,000 blank blank
Condensed milk: 2,000 hL@ $305/hL blank $ 610,000 blank
Total blank blank $ 946,000
Less: Separable Costs 135,000 270,000 405,000
NRV 201,000 340,000 541,000
NRV Weighting: blank blank blank
Product NRV ÷ Total NRV 37.15% 62.85% blank
Joint Costs Allocated $ 128,179 $ 216,821 $ 345,000
Production Cost per hL $ 328.97 $ 243.41 blank
Constant Gross Margin
Percentage of NRV Method
 Allocates joint costs to joint products in a
way that the overall gross-margin
percentage is identical for the individual
products
 Joint costs are calculated as a residual
amount
Constant Gross Margin % of NRV
Method — Example
Final Sales Value of Production blank blank blank
Buttercream: 800 hL @ $420/hL blank blank $ 336,000
Condensed milk: 2,000 hL @ $305/hL blank blank $ 610,000
Total blank blank $ 946,000
Less: Joint and separable costs blank blank
($345,000+$135,000+$270,000) 750,000
Gross margin blank blank $ 196,000
Gross margin percentage blank blank 20.719%
Blank Buttercream Condensed milk Total
Sales values $ 336,000 $ 610,000 $ 946,000
Less gross margin @ 20.719% 69,615 126,385 196,000
Total Product Costs $ 266,385 $ 483,615 $ 750,000
Less Separable Costs 135,00
0 270,000 405,000
Joint Costs Allocated $ 131,385 $ 213,615 $ 345,000
Method Selection

 If selling price at splitoff is available, use the sales


value at splitoff method.
 If selling price at splitoff is not available, use the NRV
method.
 If simplicity is the primary consideration, physical-
measures method or the constant gross-margin
method could be used.
 Despite this, some firms choose not to allocate joint
costs at all.
16-33 page 667
Sell-or-Process Further
Decisions
 In sell-or-process further decisions, joint costs are
irrelevant. Joint products have been produced, and a
prospective decision must be made: to sell
immediately or process further and sell later.
 Joint costs are sunk costs.
 Don’t assume all separable costs in joint-cost
allocations are always incremental costs.
 Some separable costs may be fixed costs.
 Separable costs need to be evaluated for relevance
individually.
Irrelevance of Joint Costs
for Decision Making

Assume that products A, B, and C can be sold


at the splitoff point or processed further
into A1, B1, and C1.
Selling Selling Additional
Units price price costs
10,000 A: $10 A1: $12 $35,000
10,500 B: $30 B1: $33 $46,500
11,500 C: $20 C1: $21 $51,500
Irrelevance of Joint Costs
for Decision Making

Should A, B, or C be sold at the splitoff


point or processed further?
Product A: Incremental revenue $20,000
– Incremental cost $35,000 = ($15,000)
Product B: Incremental revenue $31,500
– Incremental cost $46,500 = ($15,000)
Product C: Incremental revenue $11,500
– Incremental cost $51,500 = ($40,000)
16-18 page 659

You might also like