Importance of Inductive and Deductive Ap
Importance of Inductive and Deductive Ap
net/publication/375119471
CITATIONS READS
0 154
1 author:
Md Kaikubad Ali
Jamia Millia Islamia
10 PUBLICATIONS 7 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
All content following this page was uploaded by Md Kaikubad Ali on 01 November 2023.
Introduction:
The concept of research is pertained to the scholastic process of adding more information (not
necessarily different but with some new findings) to the existing knowledge. Geographers
around the world are adding new dimensions to the field of geographic knowledge.
Researches in the field of geography, along with other science and social science subjects, are
accomplished through certain approaches. As research encompasses with the philosophy,
inductive and deductive reasoning are the two kinds of logic, which are used in the field of
research to develop the hypothesis, so as to arrive at a conclusion, on the basis of
information, which is believed to be true. Both inductive and deductive approaches are
widely used in researches in every branches of knowledge. Here the discussion is focused on
the importance of the inductive and deductive approaches in geographical researches.
Deductive Approach:
Deductive approach requires the researcher to work from general to specific. The study of the
specific phenomenon is done in relation to the general established laws and theories. In this
approach the researcher or group of researchers start the work with deciding theory for
fulfilling the research objectives. Then the theory is narrowed down to more specific
hypothesis for testing. To test the hypothesis observation is made which is done after
collecting and analyzing data and relevant information. Testing the hypothesis helps the
researcher to draw conclusion and make confirmation whether to accept or to reject the
hypothesis. This justifies the existing theory and its validity. As this approach begins with
broad and general idea and brings the researcher to narrow and more specific conclusion, this
approach is also known as ‘top-down’ approach.
Fig: Deductive Approach in Research
For example, if a researcher seeks to enquire about the role of education in poverty in a
region, he would first look for the existing theories related to poverty. Then he will narrow
down his research interest to hypothesis as low level of education results in high level of
poverty. Then the researcher makes field observation and collects data for analysis. After
analyzing the information the researcher tests the hypothesis, whether it is true or false to the
ground.
Inductive Approach:
Inductive approach is just opposite of the deductive one. When particular examples are used
to reach a general conclusion about something the approach is considered to be inductive. In
this approach empirical observation plays a vital role and the study begins with the scientific
observation of the specific phenomenon. The researcher or group of researchers collects
individual scattered facts, condition or process through filed study. Then similarities and
patterns are analyzed among the individual phenomenon to prove the tentative hypothesis
scientifically in order or sequence. The phenomena are tested regarding to their reality and
factualness based on the direct observed and experienced events. This leads the researcher to
general conclusion and the theory is developed. This approach is called ‘bottom-up approach’
as the research is done from specific to general information.
Likewise researches in other social sciences, geographical research also walk with inductive
and deductive approaches of reasoning. In geographical research earlier studies were
accompanied with deductive method, where conclusions were drawn out from the premises.
There were no serious attempts, by any geographer, made in past to test the validity of the
existing premises. This was because of the reliability of the geographers on metaphysical
world views (teleological approaches. It was believed that the changes in the phenomena
were caused by law of nature. However there were geographers who put emphasis on
empirical observation and studied geography inductively.
Modern geographical time period starts with two great German geographers viz. Alexander
von Humboldt and Carl Ritter. Both were contemporary to each other but each had different
approach to explore the geography. Humboldt was a believer of inductive approach and
considered scientific observation as the sole tool for exploring the nature. He made several
expeditions and field works to many places of South America, North America, Europe and
Asia and came with many theories in the field of climatology, geomorphology, zoology,
botany, geology etc. His book Kosmos is a comprehensive account of his journeys and
expeditions. On the contrary, Carl Ritter, through fieldworks and empirical observation, put
emphasis on deducing new conclusions from fundamentals assumptions or from already
established truths. Thus his method was followed by deductive approach.
In geographical studies, there has always been methodological problem of dualism and
dichotomy. Majority of the researches in the fields of geomorphology, climatology,
oceanography and earth sciences are done using inductive approach, while specialized
branches of geography rely on deductive methods. However both the approaches are used in
researches irrespective of their fields in geography. It depends on the nature and objectives of
the research.
While conducting research it is essential to determine whether to use and inductive or
deductive approach. For this the researcher, geographer in this case, has to consider the
purpose of the study first, and secondly the methods which are best suited for either testing
hypothesis or to find answer of specific research questions.
References:
Hussain, M., (2009) Evolution of Geographical Thought, Rawat Publication, Jaipur India
Kothari, C.R., (2004), Research Methodology: Methods and Techniques, New Age
International Publishers, New Delhi
Soiferman, L.K., (2010), Compare and Contrast Inductive and Deductive Research
Approaches, University of Manitoba.
Trochim, M.K.W, (2006), Deduction & Induction
https://www.socialresearchmethods.net/kb/dedind.php accessed on 08/15/2017