Course0 Introduction
Course0 Introduction
Introduction
Christophe Gaillac
Autumn 2024
Motivation
Introduction 2 / 12
Motivation
Some nuances:
several scandals involving the use of algorithms have highlighted the
need to be able to explain their predictions (so called explainability ),
to study and correct their biases (see the fairness and bias
mitigation literature)
“p-hacking” (i.e., the practice of embarking on a specification search
to obtain significant results), or more generally the replicability crisis
in empirical economics can be seen as a problem of overfitting.
Introduction 3 / 12
Outline
2 Additional references
Introduction 4 / 12
High dimension and variable selection
Introduction 5 / 12
High dimension and variable selection
Introduction 6 / 12
High dimension and variable selection
Introduction 7 / 12
Estimation of heterogeneous effects
The average treatment effect (τ0 above) does not describe the
heterogeneity of responses to an intervention – some people may
benefit greatly from it, while others may not be affected or may
even be worse off.
Focus on a more complex parameter of interest, which is the
average treatment effect conditional on certain (observed) variables
τ : x 7→ E[Yi (1) − Yi (0)|Xi = x ].
Introduction 9 / 12
Text data
Introduction 10 / 12
Outline
2 Additional references
Introduction 11 / 12
Resources
General econometrics
1 Wooldridge, J. M. (2002). Econometric analysis of cross section and
panel data. Cambridge and London: MIT Press
2 Hansen, B. E. (2022). Econometrics. Princeton University Press.
Causal inference
1 Angrist, J. and J.-S. Pischke (2009). Mostly Harmless Econometrics:
An Empiricist’s Companion (1st ed.). Princeton University Press.
2 Chernozhukov, V., C. Hansen, N. Kallus, M. Spindler, and V.
Syrgkanis (2024). Applied causal inference powered by ML and AI.
Introduction 12 / 12
Resources
Introduction 13 / 12
Appendix
Introduction 14 / 12