Scribd
Upload
10 views2 pages

Daniel - Ift306

Docs for ift

Uploaded by

trapique.1
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
10 views2 pages

Daniel - Ift306

Docs for ift

Uploaded by

trapique.1
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

Difference between CORBA and RMI (Remote Method Invocation)

CORBA (Common Object Request Broker Architecture) and RMI (Remote Method Invocation) are both
middleware technologies for distributed computing, but they have different scopes and designs:\

CORBA RMI

Cross-platform and language-independent. It Java-specific. RMI is designed for Java objects to


allows objects from various programming interact across a network, thus is easier to use
languages (Java, C++, Python, etc.) to interact within a Java-only ecosystem.
over a network.

Uses IIOP (Internet Inter-ORB Protocol) for Uses JRMP (Java Remote Method Protocol) by
communication, which is platform-neutral. default, though it can use IIOP (RMI-IIOP) for
limited compatibility with CORBA

Interfaces are defined in IDL (Interface Definition Directly uses Java interfaces without needing a
Language), making it suitable for large, separate language for interface definition, which
heterogeneous environments where systems with simplifies development in Java-only systems.
different languages need to communicate.

CORBA is suitable for cross-language communication in diverse systems but requires more setup with
IDL, while RMI is simpler to use in Java-only environments, making it less flexible but easier to
implement.

Integrative Technologies and Methods in Application Integration

Application integration is the process of enabling independently designed applications to work together.
Here are some common integrative technologies and methods:

● Middleware: Middleware solutions like Enterprise Service Buses (ESB) or Message-Oriented


Middleware (MOM) act as intermediaries, enabling applications to communicate, regardless of
their design or platform.
● APIs: RESTful APIs and SOAP APIs allow applications to interact over a network, making
services accessible for integration. REST is popular for web-based applications, while SOAP is
common in enterprise systems needing more structured communication.
● Data Integration: Technologies like ETL (Extract, Transform, Load) and data pipelines enable
the movement and transformation of data between systems, allowing applications to share
consistent data.
● Web Services and Microservices: Microservices architecture enables modular services to
communicate with each other via lightweight protocols (e.g., HTTP), enhancing scalability and
flexibility. Web services allow for language-independent integration over the Internet.
● Message Queues: Systems like RabbitMQ or Apache Kafka provide asynchronous
communication channels, decoupling applications while ensuring data exchange is reliable and
fast.

Difference Between Data Level and Function Level Integration Models

In application integration, data-level and function-level models define different approaches:

● Data-Level Integration:
○ Involves direct access to and synchronization of data between systems.
○ This model focuses on sharing or consolidating data (e.g., using databases or ETL
processes).
○ Typically less complex because it doesn't involve calling specific functions but
only requires data consistency.

● Function-Level Integration:
○ Involves sharing and invoking specific functions or services between systems.
○ This model relies on one application calling another's services or methods (e.g.,
through APIs or web services).
○ More complex because it requires mapping and managing interactions between
different systems’ logic, ensuring function compatibility.

You might also like