CHAPTER 1 and 2
CHAPTER 1 and 2
INTRODUCTION
Theoretical framework
This framework draws upon several key studies to provide a
comprehensive understanding of the complex relationship between
Students' Attitudes towards mathematics and their achievement.
Hwang and Son (2021) and Wen and Dubé (2022) argue that
attitude is not a monolithic construct but rather the result of the interplay
of multiple components. Hwang and Son identify three key dimensions:
"Like Mathematics,""Value Mathematics," and "Confidence in
Mathematics," each making a unique contribution to achievement.
According to Wen and Dubé, this is multidimensionality, a phenomenon
that could be better described by adding that attitudes include
mathematical cognitions, affects, and behavioral intentions that will drive
the performance of students in different ways.
Conceptual framework
Students'
Attitudes Academic
Towards Performance
Mathematics
Statement of the Problem
1. What are the particular factors that affect Students attitude towards
mathematics?
FOREIGN STUDIES
LOCAL STUDIES
The study of Capuno, R., et al., (2019) revealed that there was a
negligible positive correlation between the attitudes and academic
performance of the respondents in terms of their self-confidence,
enjoyment, and motivation while there was a weak positive correlation
between the value of math and their academic performance in math. It
was concluded that students' attitudes and their study habits are
significant factors that affect their performance in mathematics. Low
performance in Mathematics is also a problem in the Philippines. For
instance, in the National Achievement Test (NAT) result for SY 2011 2012,
students showed poorly in this subject with an overall Mean Percentage
Score (MPS) of 46.37. It is second to the lowest rank which is Science with
40.53. This Chinese Taipei , and Japan are among the world’s leader in
Mathematics achievement (Mullis et al., 2011). The 2018 Program for
International Student Assessment (PISA) revealed that the Philippines
ranked near the bottom in math, with students scoring well below the
global average. This situation highlights the urgent need to improve math
education in the country. One significant barrier is the limited access to
quality teaching resources (Rivera, 2024). PISA 2022, going from 353
in 2018 to 355 in 2022 (Pisa, 2022). In Malibud National High School
under the Gingoog City Division, students have the Mean Percentage
Score (MPS) of 32.67 in Mathematics which is interpreted as low
performance.From these poor results of Mathematics assessment, Filipino
learners had already a glaring difficulty in understanding the subject, and
it became more challenging for the to catch up learning the subject when
the pandemic came in 2020 (Mejares & Tan, 2023).
Kiwanuka, H. N., Van Damme, J., Van Den Noortgate, W., Anumendem, D.
N., & Namusisi, S. (2020). The relationship between students' attitudes
toward mathematics and mathematics achievement in Uganda. Journal of
Mathematics Education, 13(2), 202-218.
Dowker, A., Sarkar, A., & Looi, C. Y. (2019). Mathematics anxiety: What
have we learned in 60 years? Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1-18. DOI:
10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01436.
OMOSIGHO, D. O., RAJI, Y. M., & RAJI, (2020) I. I. Modelling the risk factors
affecting students ‘attitude and performance in mathematics.
International Journal of Computer Application ,10(5), pp, 2250-1797.
Capuno, R., Necesario, R., Etcuban, J. O., Espina, R., Padillo, G., &
Manguilimotan, R. (2019). Attitudes, Study Habits, and Academic
Performance of Junior High School Students in Mathematics. International
Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 14(3), 547-561.
Peteros, E., Gamboa, A., Etcuban, J. O., Dinauanao, A., Sitoy, R., & Arcadio,
R. (2019). Factors affecting mathematics performance of junior high
school students. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics
Education, 15(1), em0556.
Mullis, I. V. S., Martin, M. O., Foy, P., Kelly, D. L., & Fishbein, B. (2020).
TIMSS 2019 international results in mathematics and science. Paper
presented at the TIMSS & PIRLS International Association for the
Evaluation of Educational Achievement.
Goldin, G. A., Hannula, M. S., Heyd-Metzuyanim, E., Jansen, A., Kaasila, R.,
Lutovac, S., & Zhang, Q. (2016). Attitudes, beliefs, motivation and identity
in mathematics education: An overview of the field and future directions.
ICME-13 topical survey. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
Vukovic, R. K., Roberts, S. O., & Green Wright, L. (2013). From Parental
Involvement to Children’s Mathematical Performance: The Role of
Mathematics Anxiety. Early Education & Development, 24(4), 446-467.
Retrieved on February 11, 2019 from http://goo.gl/CiCFo8
Choi B., Jung J. & Baek Y. (2013). In what way can technology enhance
student learning? A preliminary study of Technology Supported learning in
Mathematics. In R. McBride & M. Searson (Eds.), Proceedings of Society for
Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference
2013 (pp. 3-9). Chesapeake, VA: AACE. Retrieved on February 7, 2019
from http://goo.gl/Bczti5
Wang, L., Peng, F., & Song, N. (2022). The impact of students’
mathematical attitudes on intentions, behavioral engagement, and
mathematical performance in the China’s context. Frontiers in
Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1037853