On_ESP

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 5

Page 12

Influence of ESP® – "Electronic Stability Program“ – on Road Safety

Dr. E. Liebemann, Dr. W. Schroeder


Chassis Systems Control Department
Robert Bosch GmbH

Introduction
Many people feel that their individual mobility is directly linked to owning a private car. Studies indicate that practically
all regions of the world show an unmistakable correlation between the gross domestic product and mobility. It is thus safe
to assume that with increasing economic wealth, individual mobility is also further increasing with all the known conse-
quences as regards to consumption, emissions and road safety.
Europe's great wealth resulted in a vehicle fleet of 261 million vehicles in 2003. In the same year, the number of accidents
with bodily injuries registered amounted to 1.3 million and a total of 44,100 fatalities were counted. Over the same period
of time, more than 104,000 people were killed in some 500,000 accidents in China, which has a vehicle population of a
mere 22.2 million cars. Aside from differences in the infrastructure and personal habits, this is mainly due to the different
equipment of the vehicles when it comes to passive and active safety systems.

The number of people killed in road accidents has been declining for years in Europe, despite a simultaneous increase of
the mobility rate. One reason is the better equipment of vehicles with greatly improved passive safety in the structure and
passenger cell as well as the use of seat belts, head rests and airbags. Improvements in passive safety are sure to continue,
however, major progress was achieved in the active safety systems when ESP® was launched in 1995. In the following, we
are going to describe the action of the "Electronic Stability Program" ESP® and the positive effect on driving safety in
greater detail.

Mode of Action of ESP®


The ESP® system receives the required information of the driver's intentions regarding steering and braking and thus on
the vehicle's intended course through the steering and brake pressure sensors (see fig. 1).

Fig.1: Components of the ESP® system and triggered units.


The wheel speed sensors determine the current speed driven by the vehicle. The turning movement of the vehicle around
the vehicle vertical axis and the resulting lateral acceleration are measured by the lateral acceleration and yaw rate sensors.
ESP® becomes active whenever the course of the vehicle determined by this information deviates beyond a certain toler-
ance level from the course intended by the driver. Which means, that as rule, first the engine drive torque is reduced. If
this is not enough, brake pressure is generated at one wheel by the ESP® hydraulics unit. The resulting, one sided braking
torque causes a yaw moment which brings the vehicle back onto the course intended by the driver within the scope of
physics (see fig. 2).
www.rcar.org. Page 13

Fig.2: Rotation of the resulting forces


on wheels (lateral/longitudinal) through
specific increase of braking torque at
wheels.

Course deviations only occur in critical driving situations. These can be broken into the two categories of "understeering"
and "oversteering. Oversteering, also commonly referred to as skidding, frequently leads to completely losing control over
the car. A study by the German National Federation of Insurance Companies GDV indicated as early as in 1998 that 25 %
of all accidents with serious bodily injuries are caused by skidding.
In these situations of oversteering, ESP® intervenes by rapidly building up braking torque at the curve outside front wheel,
thus stabilizing the vehicle. A similar braking intervention is also initiated in driving situations which threaten to bring the
car into a roll-over situation, and has proven to be especially efficient for cars with a raised center of gravity. In addition to
the braking intervention in situations of oversteering or understeering, the drive torque of the engine is equally adjusted.
In situations of understeering, during which the vehicle is pushesd to the outside of the curve over its front wheels, ESP®
builds up braking torque on the curve inside rear wheel. This practically pulls the vehicle back into the curve. Should the
driver insist on tightening the radius of the curve even further, this will finally result in reducing the vehicle's speed (see
fig. 3).

Fig.3: Principle of enhanced


understeering control
Page 14

Most drivers react to such emergency situations by turning the steering wheel even more into the curve, which, however,
cannot yield any better driving dynamics. The error is equalized by the Bosch ESP® system with the function "Enhanced
Understeering Control". The standard understeering intervention is overridden at all four wheels by a braking torque which
reduces the vehicle speed to the extent that the curve radius requested by the driver can be achieved (see fig. 4). Normally,
the vehicle would have shot off the road in such a situation, now accidents can be prevented.

Fig.4: Improvement generated by “Enhanced Understeering Control” in mid-range cars.

Improving Road Safety


Accident research has shown that many types of accidents occur with similar relevance all over the world. Loss of control
over the vehicle due to skidding leads to single-car accidents with lateral collision, such as with posts and trees. The risk
study by the GDV for Germany indicates that 60% of all fatal accidents by single cars are lateral collisions, caused mainly
by skidding. Since ESP® effectively prevents skidding, there were very early high expectations of a confirmed, positive
impact on road safety. In the meantime, many studies from all over the world indeed provide evidence, produced by a
variety of methods, of the major positive effect of ESP® (see fig. 5).

Fig.5: Selected studies on the effectiveness of ESP® on road safety.


www.rcar.org. Page 15

DaimlerChrysler produced evidence that the share of Mercedes-Benz passenger cars involved in driving accidents went
down by some 40% since the launch of ESP® as standard equipment in Mercedes cars.

Toyota conducted a comparative study in the Japanese market. Three models, partially equipped with ESP®, were investi-
gated to find the share of vehicles with and without ESP® involved in severe driver accidents. The result was that the same
vehicle models with ESP® were about 50% less frequently involved in severe accidents than those without the system.

A study from Sweden in 2002 showed that vehicles equipped with ESP® were overall 22% less frequently involved in acci-
dents. This included all accidents registered by the police independent of their severity.

No matter what the methodological design of the study, they all arrive at similar conclusions: the more severe the type of
accidents observed, the more positive the effect of ESP® on road safety.

Even though many mid-range cars in Europe are offered with ESP® as standard equipment, the installation rate for all new
cars all over Europe in 2004 reached only some 37%. Thus the relatively small share in the total vehicle fleet indicates the
immense potential for improvement in road safety which could be realized by a wider employment of ESP® .

The slogan should be "No car without ESP®“.

References:
Liebemann E.K., Meder K., Schuh J., Nenninger G.: Safety and Performance Enhancement: The Bosch Electronic Stability
Control (ESP), SAE 2004-21-0060, ESV Conference Washington, June 2005

Van Zanten, A.T.: "Bosch ESP systems: 5 years of experience”. SAE 2000-01-1633, 2000

Dang, Jennifer N.; National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (2002): Preliminary results analyzing the effectiveness
of electronics stability control (ESC) systems;
URL: http://www.nhtsa.dot.gov/cars/rules/regrev/evaluate/809790.html [25.10.2005]

Farmer, Charles M.; Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (2004): Effect of electronic stability control on automobile
crash risk

Unselt, Thomas; Dr. Breuer, Jörg; Dr. Eckstein, Lutz; Frank, Peter; DaimlerChrysler AG (2004): Avoidance of “loss of
control accidents” through the benefit of ESP

Tingvall, Claes; Krafft, Maria; Kullgren, Anders; Lie, Anders (2002): The effectiveness of ESP (Electronic Stability Pro-
gramme) in reducing real life accidents, Paper Number 261
URL:
http://www.vv.se/filer/25588/2.%20ESP-studie%20(V%C3%A4gverket%20och%20Folksam).pdf [27.10.2005]
Aga, Masami; Okada, Akio; Toyota (2003): Analysis of vehicle stability control (VSC)´s effectiveness from accident data,
Paper No. 541
URL: http://www.esceducation.org/downloads/toyota_VSC_study.pdf [27.10.2005]

Ohono & Shimura; National Agency for Automotive Safety & Victims´ Aid (2005): Results from the survey on effective-
ness of electronic stability control (ESC), Press Release 18.02.2005

Putting Pedestrian Safety in the Driving Seat


Every year in the European Union there are over 9,000 deaths and 200,000 injured victims in
road accidents in which pedestrians and cyclist collide with a car. Hoping to improve on
these grim statistics is a cutting edge system that could ultimately help to save the lives of
vulnerable road users (VRUs). The concept is relatively straightforward, explains Dr Marc-
Michael Meinecke of Volkswagen, which is one of the chief partners in the IST-sponsored
SAVE-U project along with other key industry players such as Daimler Chrysler, MIRA and
Siemens VDO Automotive. “SAVE-U combines sensors such as radar, vision and infra-red
camera, as well as senor fusion and actuators to increase safety for pedestrians. The main
idea is that the sensors will recognize pedestrians and if the pedestrian has a high probability
to collide with the vehicle then automatic braking will be initiated by the system,” he says.
For further information contact Dr Marc -Michael Meinecke, Pre-Crash Sensing/Pedestrian Recognition, Volkswagen AG.
E-mail: [email protected].
(Source: Information Society Technologies. http://istresults.cordis.lu) - for this and other similar interesting topics.
From The Secretary General
Research Council for Automobile Repairs

Newsletter
——————————————————————— –

Welcome to the March 2006 edition of the RCAR Newsletter. This


Pound House issue contains news from thirteen of our twenty-six centres. Pride of
Lockeridge place on the front page is given to IAG Australia who opened their
Marlborough, Wiltshire
new centre this month. This seems to me to be a very bold statement,
SN8 4EL United Kingdom
if one were needed, of the importance of our RCAR Members’ work
Phone: +44 1672 861072 in influencing safety and the economic aspects of motoring. We con-
Fax: +44 870 705 8565 gratulate IAG on the opening of their new research facility. However
Email: [email protected] other very important work is being undertaken elsewhere in Asia,
North and South America, and in Europe. I am grateful for centres in
Dates For Your Diary these regions for sharing their progress with us in this issue.

International Bodyshop Industry Symposium I also welcome two new European heads of centre into the RCAR
(IBIS) is to be held in Montreux, Switzerland, Community: Vincent Claeys has taken over Cesvi France from Jean-
31 May—2 June 2006. Denis Gosselin and Frank Leimbach has taken over from Klaus-
Details: www.ibisworldwide.com Dieter Moser at KTI, Germany. We hope that they both settle in and
enjoy their work and we look forward to meeting them in October at
Crash Test Expo Europe 2006 is to be held in the RCAR meeting in Japan.
Stuttgart, Germany, 9-11 May 2006.
Details: www.crashtest-expo.com In respect of the October meeting, I have started the planning process
with our colleagues in JKC and I am sure Mr Minoru Suzuki and his
50th Annual Conference of the Association for
team will host a memorable RCAR Conference later this year.
the Advancement of Automotive Medicine
(AAAM) is to be held in Chicago, Illinois, I noted with interest that Thatcham have organised a two-day sympo-
15-18 October 2006. sium on Electronic Stability Control (ESC) which I look forward to
Details: www.carcrash.org attending. This very important issue is covered in a technical article in
this newsletter. I am indebted to Hartmuth Wolff of AZT for liaising
Annual RCAR Conference 20006 is to be held
with Robert Bosch GmbH. Drs Liebemann and Schroeder of the
in Tokyo, Japan 22-28 October 2006, and will be
Chassis Systems Control Department of Robert Bosch have produced
hosted by The Jiken Centre .
an excellent article, for which I am most grateful.
NACE 2006 is to be held in Las Vegas, Nevada,
2-4 November 2006. In the UK we are just emerging from our winter and I know a number
Details: www.naceexpo.com. of northern hemisphere centres have had a harsh winter, Japan and
Korea in particular, and some of you may find the pictures of the Ko-
50th STAPP Car Crash Conference is to be held rean centre, KART, under snow of interest.
in Dearborn, Michigan, 6-8 November 2006 De-
tails: www.stapp.org I look forward to seeing most of you later in the year.

SAE 2007 World Congress is to be held in De- With best wishes,


troit, Michigan, 16-20 April 2007.
Details: www.sae.org Michael Smith

The RCAR Network


Of the 26 RCAR Centres in 19 countries, all have web sites. Addresses are to be found on www.rcar.org.
For convenience, web sites are also listed below.

AZT Germany www.allianz-azt.de KTI Germany www.k-t-i.de


Centro Zaragoza Spain www.centro-zaragoza.com Lansforsakringar Sweden www.lansforsakringar.se
Cesvimap Spain www.cesvimap.com MPI Camada www.mpi.mb.ca
Cesvi Argentina www.cesvi.com.ar JKC Japan www.jikencenter.co.jp
Cesvi Brasil www.cesvibrasil.com.br KART Korea www.kidi.co.kr
Cesvi Colombia www.cesvicolombia.com MRC Malaysia www.e-mrc.com.my
Cesvi France www.cesvifrance.fr FNH Norway www.fnh.no
Cesvi Mexico www.cesvimexico.com.mx IAG Australia www.nrma.com.au
CESTAR Italy www.cestar.it State Farm USA www.statefarm.com
VAT Finland www.liikennevakuutuskeskus.fi Tech-Cor USA www.tech-cor.com
Folksam Auto Sweden www.folksamauto.com Thatcham UK www.thatcham.org
ICBC Canada www.icbc.com VIC/IBC Canada www.vicc.com
IIHS USA www.highwaysafety.org Winterthur Switzerland www.winterthur.com

You might also like