Peer Review Form
Peer Review Form
Guidelines: Respond to all sections of this review guide as accurately as possible. If you cannot answer a
factual question, that probably indicates a problem with the paper, so point that out. Remember that your
only goal is to help the author improve his/her paper. If you see a problem, you need to point it out,
trying to suggest ways to fix it.
You are strongly encouraged to add comments on the paper as well as on this form since those are
metrics used to mark your peer review.
Proofreading may be noted, but proofreading should not be the focus of your efforts. Read through these
questions; then read the paper carefully and answer the questions, referring to the paper as needed.
Preliminary Questions
What is the data structure/algorithm described by the paper?
The XGBoost algorithm.
Were you familiar with the data structure/algorithm before reading this paper? Yes No
Content:
Does the paper clearly describe the data structure/algorithm?
It is unclear.
Could you implement the data structure/algorithm based on the information in the paper?
No.
Does the paper clearly explain the advantages/disadvantages of the data structure/algorithm?
There are advantages and disadvantages listed, but the algorithm itself is difficult to understand.
There are some terms and information not covered in this course or prerequisites, such as linear
regression, gradient descent, and what a histogram is and does.
Writing Style:
Is the organization of the paper clear and easy to follow?
The organization of the paper was confusing to follow.
Comments on format:
Try to keep the paper more structured with paragraphs and topics.
Comments:
Make sure to include in-text citations. You’re also missing many commas. Try to flesh out your
paragraphs and keep a central topic, you could combine the ones you’ve split.