PROBLEM BASE LEARNING

Pet-E-422L
Principles of Reservoir Simulation
Semester: Fall 2024

Author:
Dr. -Ing. Faisal Mehmood / Engr. Syed Ahmad Altaf
Associate Professor / Lab Engineer

Course Learning Outcome GAs/PLOs

CLO2: Students will be able to Design/ Develop Solutions for reservoir PLO-3;
performance prediction and incorporate various production strategies in Design/Development
reservoir modelling. of Solutions
CLO3: Students will be able to practice, how to investigate using software PLO-9; Individual
for reservoir performance prediction. and Team Work

DEPARTMENT OF PETROLEUM & GAS ENGINEEIRNG

1|Page
 Problem Base Learning

To evaluate a more detailed 3-D model between the injector and producer well.

Instructions:

1. Select the corresponding data file but make sure include the physics of the reservoir in
your final report.
2. Sandstone, shale, mudstone.
3. Please update your data file with the specific values assigned to you in the provided
excel sheet, based on your registration number.
4. Use 2 saturation tables having 5 rows and 1 PVT table having 3 rows.
5. Reservoir Pressure: 6000 psi
6. Porosity: 20%
7. Production rate: 1500, 2000 & 2500 STB/D
8. Injection rate: 1500, 2000 & 2500 STB/D
9. BHP limit of production and injection well is 2000 and 9000 psi respectively.
10. Time period: 5 years with a time step of 2 days.
11. Compared with corresponding base cases, without injection.
12. Evaluate the field oil recovery efficiency (FOE) vs time.
13. Evaluate the field water production total (FWPT) with field oil production total
(FOPT) vs time in the single graph.
14. Evaluate the field oil production rate (FOPR) with field water production rate
(FWPR) vs time in the single graph.

Please submit your PBL in hard copy, including the last two pages printed out.

Plagiarism Policy:

Please follow the academic integrity policy, laid down by the University of Engineering and
Technology, which strongly prohibits plagiarism in all forms and manifestations. No
tolerance for plagiarism. Plagiarized work will give zero weightage.

2|Page
 Problem Base Learning Rubrics CLO 02
Graded
0 0.5 0.75 1 Marks
Criteria Poor Moderate Good Excellent /1

Explanation and Very little understanding Some basic understanding Understanding is okay but Excellent and complete
Understanding of of problem is there, but still missing still missing some minor understanding of the
Problem some major points points problem. Everything is
in its place.
Exploration of Didn’t play with variables Consider a few possible Played with a number of Played with maximum
Problem at all variables variables but could have been number of variables.
better

Completeness Section covered with Sections are mostly in All sections in order, Good All sections in order,
minimum details order. Moderate coverage coverage of details in all well-written Excellent
of sections coverage of details in all
details in all sections sections
Accuracy Of Results and interpretation Results are not fully right, Results are okay but there are Absolutely accurate
Results are wrong still minor problems in results.
calculations

Arrangement of Format is not right (Line Formatting is according to Formatting of data is okay Excellent formatting
data and Drafting spacing, font type, font instructions but still some but still could have been and arrangement of data
size etc.) Data is not error with minor errors in improved. without any error.
arranged fully. arrangement of data

3|Page
 Problem Base Learning Rubrics CLO 03
Graded
0 0.5 0.75 1 Marks
Criteria Poor Moderate Good Excellent /1

Explanation and Very little understanding Some basic understanding Understanding is okay but Excellent and complete
Understanding of of problem is there, but still missing still missing some minor understanding of the
Problem some major points points problem. Everything is
in its place.
Exploration of Didn’t play with variables Consider a few possible Played with a number of Played with maximum
Problem at all variables variables but could have been number of variables.
better

Completeness Section covered with Sections are mostly in All sections in order, Good All sections in order,
minimum details order. Moderate coverage coverage of details in all well-written Excellent
of sections coverage of details in all
details in all sections sections
Accuracy Of Results and interpretation Results are not fully right, Results are okay but there are Absolutely accurate
Results are wrong still minor problems in results.
calculations

Arrangement of Format is not right (Line Formatting is according to Formatting of data is okay Excellent formatting
data and Drafting spacing, font type, font instructions but still some but still could have been and arrangement of data
size etc.) Data is not error with minor errors in improved. without any error.
arranged fully. arrangement of data

4|Page