L19-Synthetic Unit Hydrograpxhs
L19-Synthetic Unit Hydrograpxhs
Learning Objectives
The Soil Conservation Service (SCS) has performed a synthesis of a great number of unit
hydrographs for river basins of various sizes located in different regions of the USA. In order
to compare these unit hydrographs their ordinates and abscissas were normalized. Were
divided the ordinates by the peak discharges up while the abscissas were divided by the time
to peak tp. Furthermore, the non-dimensional ordinates and abscissas were averaged
obtaining the non-dimensional synthetic hydrograph (SUH), the abscissas t/tp and ordinates
of which u(t)/up are given in Table 4.2.
The synthetic unit hydrograph and its corresponding "S" curve are presented in Figure 4.3.
Also in the same Figure the triangular approximation of the SCS-synthetic unit hydrograph
and its "S" curve is shown.
Figure 4.3 The SCS-synthetic unit hydrograph and its triangular approximation
The concentration time tc between the end of effective rainfall and the inflexion point
of the hydrograph;
The lag time t1 between the mid-point of the effective rainfall and the time of the peak
discharge (approx. t1 = 0.66 tc);
(4.9)
(4.10)
From equation 4.9 one obtains the expression of the peak discharge as a function of
increase time:
(4.11)
(4.12)
with
Considering that:
(4.13)
Linking the SCS-synthetic unit hydrograph with the reference duration of effective rainfall, D,
one obtains:
(4.14)
As such, SCS consider that the following relation is valid for the United States:
(4.15)
The "S" curve allows for deriving the unit hydrograph of certain duration Tτ of effective
rainfall, starting from a unit hydrograph having the reference duration τ, through the following
steps (Figure 4.5):
For cases where the duration T is a multiple n integer of τ (T = nτ), the unit hydrograph can
be found more easily by applying the principle of convolution. Thus the unit hydrograph of
duration τ is shifted n times with the duration τ, the ordinates are added and the resulted
hydrograph is divided by n.
It is reminded that the product of convolution of two mathematical functions is defined as:
(4.16)
where:
Let S(t) be the dimensionless ordinates of the time t of the "S" curve of a river basin.
According to Figure 4.5 the ordinates of the unit hydrograph of a duration τ are given by the
relation:
(4.17)
where u(t) has the dimensions [h-1, min-1], S is dimensionless and τ is a duration
(4.18)
and
(4.19)
Furthermore, the intensity function should be now defined. Let Ie(τ) represent the effective
rainfall intensity function that is multiplied by the area of the river catchment A and by the
duration τ in order to determine effective rainfall volume.
(4.20)
Figure 4.7 Convolution of the intensity function Ie(t) with the instantaneous
unit hydrograph u0(t) giving the discharge hydrograph Q(t)
t - τ should not exceed the base time of the unit hydrograph Tb , that is
The product of convolution allows for maintenance of the linearity and invariance hypotheses
of the theory of the unit hydrograph.
The conceptual unit hydrographs result from the representation of the integration process of
the effective rainfall as a cascade of reservoirs that fill and deplete according to certain laws.
Let us consider one reservoir as presented in the Figure 4.8 that is characterised by three
functions that are the rate of filling I(t), the storage S(t), and the rate of depletion (drainage)
Q(t).
Figure 4.8 A linear reservoir
The behaviour of the function of this reservoir is ruled according to the following laws:
Continuity law:
(4.21)
Storage law:
(4.22)
where K is the storage coefficient and it is a constant that confers to the reservoir the
property of linearity.
(4.23)
(4.24)
where M(d) and N(d) are the differential operators relative to the I and Q, respectively. The
ratio M(d)/N(d) is defined as the transfer function of the system. The methods for establishing
above relations as proposed by several authors is discussed below.
The instantaneous unit hydrograph proposed by Nash (1957) is a conceptual model that
uses the effect of "lamination" of an effective rainfall having the depth of 1mm and duration
that tends towards zero. This lamination is performed by a cascade of n linear reservoirs
having identical storage coefficient K (Figure 4.9).
Figure 4.9 The Nash concept for deriving the instantaneous unit hydrograph
(4.25)
(4.26)
The integration of equation (4.25) is obtained by multiplying both terms from the right and left
side with et/K and one obtains:
(4.27)
Thus the output from the first reservoir becomes the input in the second one and so on.
Therefore, replacing t - τ by τ yields:
(4.28)
Again the convolution equation allows for determining the output from the second reservoir:
(4.29)
or:
(4.30)
Reiterating the procedure for n reservoirs the general expression of the ordinates of the
Nash instantaneous unit hydrograph is obtained as:
(4.31)
(4.32)
.......
Relation 4.31 is the probabilistic Γ distribution function with two parameters. It is well known
that the integral of the probabilistic distribution function is always equal to 1, which is the
volume of the unit hydrograph.
The increase time tp and the peak discharge Qp are derived by solving the equation dQ/dt =
0, as follows:
(4.34)
and:
(4.35)
Finally, the ordinates of the instantaneous unit hydrograph might be expressed as a function
of the increase time and the peak discharge, as given below:
(4.36)
The instantaneous unit hydrograph derived by Nash is determined only as a function of two
parameters, namely n and K . The influence of these parameters upon the shape and the
magnitude of the hydrograph are presented in Figure 4.10. One observes that while the
parameter n influences the shape of the hydrograph, the parameter Kdetermines the position
of the peak discharge. The higher the parameter K, the further the peak discharge is shifted
with respect to abscissa. When the parameter naugments the peak discharge Q augments
too, since, under the circumstances that tp is kept constant, the increase of the parameter n
corresponds to the diminution of the storage coefficient; and therefore the wave becomes
sharper.
Figure 4.10. Sensitivity of the Nash model to the parameters n and K(tp)
Another example of the sensitivity of the Nash instantaneous unit hydrograph to the
parameter n while the storage K parameter is kept constant is presented in Figure 4.11.
Figure 4.11. Sensitivity of the Nash instantaneous unit hydrograph to the parameter
n
By taking first order M1k, M1Q and second order M2k, M2Q moments of the effective rainfall
hyetograph and the resulting discharge hydrograph respectively, and taking into account the
convolution equation 4.20 and the analytical expression for the instantaneous unit
hydrograph 4.25, Nash (1957) found the following relations between the parameters n, K and
these moments:
(4.37)
where the moments are computed as presented in Figure 4.12.
Figure 4.12 The method of moments for deriving the instantaneous hydrograph
Moments of the hyetograph of effective rainfall and the hydrograph of the discharge were
determined as follows:
(4.38)
(4.39)
(4.40)
(4.41)
where:
hi depth of effective rainfall [m/s] throughout the time interval Δt between the
ordinates i and i + 1;
N
number of ordinates the hydrograph has been split.
Q
(4.42)
(4.43)
The unit hydrograph is considered a constant function of the basin while actually it
depends on the effective rainfall intensity, which will vary from one flood event to
another.
for this reason the method of moments is jointly applied with an optimisation procedure of the
parameters that involves the following operations:
For each pair of j parameters the ordinates of the instantaneous unit hydrograph are
computed.
Applying the "S" curve method, the unit hydrographs specific to the considered
reference duration are determined for all flood events. These unit hydrographs are
multiplied by convolution with the corresponding effective rainfalls, resulting in
computed hydrographs.
The computed Qij(c) and measured Qij(m) hydrographs are then compared using a
criteria function F as follows:
(4.44)
where NQ(j) is the number of the ordinates of each of j hydrographs (that is different from the
number of effective rainfall segments of τ reference duration).
Those relating the unit hydrographs characteristics (peak discharge, time to peak, base time, etc.)
to the morphologic parameters of the catchment. The procedure of such geographical interpolation
is called regionalisation.
Those based on a procedure that makes dimensionless the unit hydrograph (see the US-Soil
Conservation Service unit hydrograph). This could be used for assessing the unit hydrograph in
the similar regions with those for which the dimensionless unit hydrograph is available.
Those based on conceptual models of the effective rainfall integration process over the basin (see
chapters 4.2.3 - 4.2.5). This type of approach determines the synthetic unit hydrograph either on
the basis of parameters of the mathematical expression of the instantaneous unit hydrograph or on
the basis of moments of several orders of the unit hydrograph. These are further linked with the
morphologic parameters of the catchment. Thus, the third category represents in fact the first one
to which the mathematical model was added.
(4.83)
For a standard unit hydrograph, the following relations have been derived:
(4.84)
where:
L length of the main river course in km from the outlet to the upstream divide line
Lc distance in km from the outlet to the point of the river nearest the centroid of
the catchment
C1 coefficient derived from the gauged catchments in the same region (1 for the
English system)
The specific peak discharge [m3/km2] of the standard hydrograph is given by:
(4.85)
where:
For a given effective rainfall tR that is different of durations tr of the standard hydrograph the
"derived unit hydrograph obtained from the data on effective rainfall and corresponding
hydrograph" would be defined by several parameters as shown in Figure 4.2:
If then tlaf R = 5.5 tR and tR = tr and upR = up and Ct and Cp are computed applying equations 4.82
and 4.83.
If tlaf R ≠ 5.5 tR then the lag time of the standard basin is:
(4.86)
and values of tlag and tr are obtained from equations 4.83 and 4.85, which are solved
simultaneously. Values of the coefficients Ct and Cp are computed from 4.84 and 4.85 with upR =
up and tlaf R = tlag.
Figure 4.20. Snyder's unit hydrograph; (a) Standard unit hydrograph (tlag= 5.5 tr )
(b) Required unit hydrograph (tlag ≠ 5.5 tr). (Chow et al., 1988)
Once the coefficients Ct and Cp are derived for both cases tlaf R = 5.5 tR or tlaf R ≠ 5.5 tR the unit
hydrograph indicators of an ungauged catchment situated in a region that is similar, from the
point of view of physiographical characteristics of the landscape, with the basins from which the
coefficients Ct and Cp were derived, are given by:
(4.87)
The base time is derived assuming the shape of the unit hydrograph is a triangle of an unit
area (1mm):
(4.88)
where:
(4.89)
where:
Cper = 1,22 (440 for the English system) for per = 75%
Cper = 2,14 (770 for the English system) for per = 50%
Mention is made that practically one-third of the width is distributed before the peak time and
two-thirds after the peak.
The synthetic unit hydrograph for ungauged basins are obtained from relationships 4.87-
4.89, which are derived from the correlation of the parameters of the mathematical
expressions of the instantaneous unit hydrograph and the morphologic characteristics of the
catchments. These relations are conceptually based on the physical meaning of the
parameters while performing the conceptual model of unit hydrograph. For example,
according to relations 4.34 and 4.35 the time to peak and the maximum discharge of Nash
instantaneous unit hydrograph are function of the parameters n and K, which define the
ordinates of IUH given by the function of distribution Γ with two parameters. At their turn the
time to peak tp and the maximum discharge Qp are physically related with the morphologic
parameters of the basin. Good relationships have been found between the time to peak tp
and the morphologic parameter , where Ib, Ir are the mean slopes of the basin and the
river, respectively, and F is the area of the basin. This parameter can be written as
and the first term expresses the velocity along the river and the second one the
velocity along the slope. Both velocities are determinant for the time to peak of the
hydrograph. Thus
(4.90)
Again, the peak discharge is a function of the shape of the basin (see Figure 4.16) and the
concentration time of the basin. Physically, the shape of the basin is dependent on the shape
coefficient of the basin B/L where B and L are the mean width of the basin F/L and the
length, respectively. Also the concentration time depends on both the slope of the river and
of the basin so that finally the peak discharge of the unit hydrograph may be written as a
function:
(4.91)
Further on the determination of the parameters of the instantaneous unit hydrograph function
is made as follows:
The morphologic parameters are determined on the basis of maps of the catchments
The system of equations 4.34 and 4.35 is solved by constructing the function
and having the product Qp.tp from the graph of the types presented in Figures 4.21
and 4.22 the value of the parameter n is determined.
The value of the second parameter is then obtained from equation 4.34:
(4.92)
Figure 4.23 Graph of the function