MA417 Lecture 21
MA417 Lecture 21
Lecture 21
Debanjana Mitra
Department of Mathematics
Indian Institute of Technology Bombay
Powai, Mumbai - 76
October 1, 2021
Regular Sturm-Liouville’s problem
Regular Sturm-Liouville’s problem
Regular Sturm-Liouville’s problem:
Under the following assumptions:
1. The interval (a, b) is open and bounded, i.e., a and b are distinct
and finite real numbers.
2. The functions p ∈ C 1 ([a, b]), q ∈ C ([a, b]) and r ∈ C ([a, b]) are real
valued. Further, p(t) > 0 and r (t) > 0 on [a, b].
3. The boundary condtions:
U1 (y ) = 0, U2 (y ) = 0.
Wronskian for BVP
Theorem
Let φ and ψ be two solutions satisfying the Regular Sturm-Liouville’s
problem for a λ ∈ C : L(y )(t) = λr (t)y (t), on (a, b), with boundary
conditions U1 (y ) = 0 and U2 (y ) = 0, then the Wronskian W (φ, ψ)
satisfies: p(t)W (φ, ψ)(t) = constant, ∀, t ∈ [a, b], where
W (φ, ψ)(t) = φ(t)ψ 0 (t) − φ0 (t)ψ(t).
Proof: We have
L(φ)(t) = λr (t)φ(t), on (a, b), U1 (φ) = 0 = U2 (φ), (1)
L(ψ)(t) = λr (t)ψ(t), on (a, b), U1 (ψ) = 0 = U2 (ψ). (2)
Multiplying (1) with ψ and (2) with φ and taking difference between
them, we get
d d
(p(t)ψ 0 (t))φ(t) − (p(t)φ0 (t))ψ(t) = 0.
dt dt
Now taking integration of the above identity over [a, t], for any t ∈ (a, b],
we get
p(t)W (φ, ψ)(t) = p(a)W (φ, ψ)(a), ∀ t ∈ [a, b],
and hence the result is proved.
Proof of Property 3. in Main theorem (Lecture 20)
Theorem
Each eigenvalue of a regular Sturm-Liouville’s problem is simple, i.e., to
each eigenvalue, there corresponds one and only one eigenfunction, up to
a constant factor, i.e., the dimension of the eigenspace corresponding to
each eigenvalue is 1.
Proof: For any eigenvalue λ, let φ and ψ be eigenfunctions i.e.,
α1 φ(a) + α2 φ0 (a) = 0,
α1 ψ(a) + α2 ψ 0 (a) = 0.
Since (α1 , α2 ) 6= (0, 0), from above it follows that W (φ, ψ)(a) = 0.
Thus, using previous theorem along with p(t) 6= 0 on [a, b], we get
W (φ, ψ)(t) = 0, for all t ∈ [a, b].
It yields that φ, ψ are linearly dependent, i.e., there exists a c ∈ C such
that ψ(t) = cφ(t), ∀ t ∈ [a, b].
Regular Sturm-Liouville’s problem
Let all assumptions in the regular Sturm-Liouville’s problem hold.
Consider the eigenvalue problem:
Recall, we have
1. The regular Sturm-Liouville’s problem has an infinite sequence of
real eigenvalues
λ1 < λ2 < · · · < λn < · · · ,
with limn→∞ λn = ∞.
2. The set of normalized eigenfunctions {φn }∞ n=1 , where the
eigenfunction φn corresponds to the eigenvalue λn , form an
orthonormal basis in L2r (a, b). That is any f ∈ L2r (a, b) can be
represented by
∞
X
f = hf , φn iL2r φn , in L2r (a, b).
n=1
2
Further, if f ∈ C ([a, b]) satisfying U1 (f ) = 0 = U2 (f ), the series
converges absolutely and uniformly on [a, b].
Non-homogeneous ODE: Regular Sturm-Liouville’s problem
Let all assumptions in the regular Sturm-Liouville’s problem hold. For
any f ∈ C ([a, b]), consider the BVP:
d
L(y )(t) = − (p(t)y 0 (t)) + q(t)y (t) = λr (t)y (t) + f (t), ∀t ∈ (a, b),
dt
(5)
with homogeneous boundary conditions:
then (5) has a unique solution for every f ∈ C ([a, b]) and this
solution is given by
∞
X hf , φiL2
y (t) = r
φn (t), t ∈ [a, b].
n=1
λn − λ
Contd...
hf , φj iL2r = 0.
for any c ∈ C.
The advantage of the above result is the explicit represent formula of the
solution of the Non-homogeneous ODE.
Thus, U1 (φ1 ) = 0.
Let φ2 be the solution of the IVP:
Thus, U2 (φ2 ) = 0.
the two solutions of the second order ODE, φ1 and φ2 are linearly
independent on [a, b], and hence
Thus, we get
f (t)
C10 (t)φ01 (t) + C20 (t)φ02 (t) = − , t ∈ [a, b]. (8)
p(t)
Contd...
Writting (7)-(8) together,
we get
Note that using W (φ1 , φ2 )(t) 6= 0 for all t ∈ [a, b], to make U1 (φ) = 0,
we need C2 (a) = 0 and to make U2 (φ) = 0, we need C1 (b) = 0.
Thus, solving C1 and C2 , we get
Z b
φ2 (τ )
C1 (t) = − f (τ ) dτ, ∀ t ∈ [a, b],
t p(τ )W (φ1 , φ2 )(τ )
Z t
φ1 (τ )
C2 (t) = − f (τ ) dτ, ∀ t ∈ [a, b].
a p(τ )W (φ1 , φ2 )(τ )
Thus, we get that the solution φ satisfying
is represented by
Z b Z t
φ1 (t)φ2 (τ ) φ1 (τ )φ2 (t)
φ(t) = − f (τ ) dτ − f (τ ) dτ
t p(τ )W (φ1 , φ2 )(τ ) a p(τ )W (φ1 , φ2 )(τ )
Setting G (t, τ ) as
− φ1 (τ )φ2 (t) , a ≤ τ ≤ t,
p(τ )W (φ1 ,φ2 )(τ )
G (t, τ ) =
− φ1 (t)φ2 (τ ) , t ≤ τ ≤ b,
p(τ )W (φ1 ,φ2 )(τ )
we get
Z b
φ(t) = G (t, τ )f (τ ) dτ, ∀ t ∈ [a, b].
a
Properties of Green’s function