Pedagogy vs
Pedagogy vs
Pedagogy vs
Andragogy:
What's the Difference?
FOR RESEARCHERS , FOR TEACHERS , LEARNING SCIENTISTS
POSTS
By Cindy Nebel
This has been a fundamental question that I have been asked time
and time again. Much of what we know about learning and memory
comes from research on students – college students (1,2), middle
school students (3), etc. – but usually individuals who are in the
formal education part of life. To generalize from these studies to
someone mid-career, perhaps with grown children, who is choosing
to engage in self-study; to say that we understand how you think
because we know how teenagers think… is that reasonable?
Let’s start with Knowles’ framework. Here are the components that
Knowles claims make for successful adult education and how they
differ from the instruction of children:
Need to Know
o Pedagogy: Learners only need to know what it takes to pass
the class, not to apply it to their lives.
o Andragogy: Learners need to know WHY they need to know
the information.
Self-Concept
o Pedagogy: The learner is dependent.
o Andragogy: The learner is a self-directed human who learns
more when they have some control over their learning and
don’t just sit back and wait to be taught.
Role of Experience
o Pedagogy: The learner’s experience doesn’t matter, only
the teacher’s or textbook writer’s.
o Andragogy: Adults have so much more experience in life
that adults are much more diverse than students and
therefore learn more from experiential (hands-on, active)
learning techniques.
Readiness to Learn
o Pedagogy: Learners will be ready to learn if they want to
pass the class.
o Andragogy: Adults need just-in-time learning so that they
are learning things they can use right away.
Orientation to Learning
o Pedagogy: Learners see their role as acquiring subject
matter.
o Andragogy: Adults see the purpose of learning as acquiring
information about a task or problem-at-hand.
Motivation to Learn
o Pedagogy: Learners’ motivation is purely extrinsic – grades
and approval are all that matter.
o Andragogy: While adults do have some extrinsic motivation
regarding promotions and the like, they also have intrinsic
motivation to simply “be better”.
While the above are my words, they are very close to what is written
in Knowles (1989). And, if I’m being honest, I’m really glad I wasn’t
teaching in the pedagogical era that Knowles is referring to. This
seems like a pretty pessimistic way of looking at education and a
negative way of looking at our students!
Image from Pixabay
From what I can tell (and from what others have shared on twitter, it
seems as though pedagogy has shifted to look more and more like
the andragogy that Knowles describes. The primary difference
between child and adult learners? Their motivation to learn…
sometimes. Children are put in classrooms and aren’t really given a
choice about whether or not to be there, although when they do feel
as though they have choice they will be more motivated to learn.
Adults sometimes are choosing to learn. This is certainly true for
adults coming back to school, but I would argue that most adults are
put in formal or informal learning situations that they also aren’t
choosing. Ever sat through an annoying PD session that had nothing
to do with your role? Completed that annual training that required
you to watch a bunch of online videos and take a quiz? How
engaged were you in those learning situations?
Bottom Line
Educators should know their learners, make content relevant to
those individuals, give them choice in the learning process, and
build on their prior knowledge – whether they are novices or experts
in the domain at hand. These principles are true for learners of any
age.
References:
(3) McDaniel, M. A., Agarwal, P. K., Huelser, B. J., McDermott, K. B., &
Roediger III, H. L. (2011). Test-enhanced learning in a middle school
science classroom: the effects of quiz frequency and placement.
Journal of Educational Psychology, 103(2), 399.