0% found this document useful (0 votes)

379 views34 pages

Aashto R18

Uploaded by

Sardar Khudhur

We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.

Available Formats

Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

0% found this document useful (0 votes)

379 views34 pages

Aashto R18

Uploaded by

Sardar Khudhur

We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.

Available Formats

Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd

You are on page 1/ 34

Standard Recommended Practice for

Establishing and Implementing a

Quality Management System for
Construction Materials Testing
Laboratories

AASHTO Designation: R 18-161

Release: Group 1 (April 2016)

American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials

444 North Capitol Street N.W., Suite 249
Washington, D.C. 20001

--``,```,,```,`,,,```,```,,````,-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---

Copyright American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials

Provided by IHS under license with AASHTO Licensee=Colorado Department of Transporation/5971061001, User=falls, dan
No reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS Not for Resale, 02/08/2017 07:12:24 MST
Standard Recommended Practice for

Establishing and Implementing a Quality

Management System for Construction

--``,```,,```,`,,,```,```,,````,-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
Materials Testing Laboratories

AASHTO Designation: R 18-16 1

Release: Group 1 (April 2016)

1. SCOPE
1.1. This document contains criteria and guidelines for establishing and implementing a quality
management system (QMS) for use by a construction materials testing (CMT) laboratory.

1.2. The criteria in this document only apply to the following testing areas: soil, aggregate, asphalt
binder, cutback asphalt, emulsified asphalt, asphalt mixtures, hydraulic cement, portland cement
concrete, unit masonry, metals, plastic pipe, and sprayed fire-resistive material.

2. REFERENCED DOCUMENTS
2.1. AASHTO Standards:
 M 92, Wire-Cloth Sieves for Testing Purposes
 M 152M/M 152, Flow Table for Use in Tests of Hydraulic Cement
 R 28, Accelerated Aging of Asphalt Binder Using a Pressurized Aging Vessel (PAV)
 R 59, Recovery of Asphalt Binder from Solution by Abson Method
 R 61, Establishing Requirements for Equipment Calibrations, Standardizations, and Checks
 R 68, Preparation of Asphalt Mixtures by Means of the Marshall Apparatus
 T 19M/T 19, Bulk Density (“Unit Weight”) and Voids in Aggregate
 T 22, Compressive Strength of Cylindrical Concrete Specimens
 T 23, Making and Curing Concrete Test Specimens in the Field
 T 48, Flash and Fire Points by Cleveland Open Cup
 T 49, Penetration of Bituminous Materials
 T 50, Float Test for Bituminous Materials
 T 51, Ductility of Asphalt Materials
 T 53, Softening Point of Bitumen (Ring-and-Ball Apparatus)
 T 59, Emulsified Asphalts
 T 72, Saybolt Viscosity
 T 79, Flash Point with Tag Open-Cup Apparatus for Use with Material Having a Flash Point
Less Than 93ºC (200ºF)
 T 84, Specific Gravity and Absorption of Fine Aggregate
 T 88, Particle Size Analysis of Soils
 T 89, Determining the Liquid Limit of Soils

TS-AMRL R 18-1 AASHTO

© 2016 by the American Association of State
Copyright American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials
Provided by IHS under license with AASHTO Highway and
Licensee=Colorado Transportation
Department Officials. User=falls, dan
of Transporation/5971061001,
No reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS All rights reserved. Duplication Not
is aforviolation of applicable
Resale, 02/08/2017 law.
07:12:24 MST
 T 96, Resistance to Degradation of Small-Size Coarse Aggregate by Abrasion and Impact in
the Los Angeles Machine
 T 98M/T 98, Fineness of Portland Cement by the Turbidimeter
 T 99, Moisture-Density Relations of Soils Using a 2.5-kg (5.5-lb) Rammer and a 305-mm
(12-in.) Drop
 T 100, Specific Gravity of Soils
 T 104, Soundness of Aggregate by Use of Sodium Sulfate or Magnesium Sulfate
 T 106M/T 106, Compressive Strength of Hydraulic Cement Mortar (Using 50-mm or 2-in.
Cube Specimens)
 T 119M/T 119, Slump of Hydraulic Cement Concrete
 T 121M/T 121, Density (Unit Weight), Yield, and Air Content (Gravimetric) of Concrete
 T 129, Amount of Water Required for Normal Consistency of Hydraulic Cement Paste
 T 131, Time of Setting of Hydraulic Cement by Vicat Needle
 T 134, Moisture-Density Relations of Soil-Cement Mixtures
 T 135, Wetting-and-Drying Test of Compacted Soil-Cement Mixtures
 T 136, Freezing-and-Thawing Tests of Compacted Soil-Cement Mixtures
 T 137, Air Content of Hydraulic Cement Mortar
 T 152, Air Content of Freshly Mixed Concrete by the Pressure Method
 T 153, Fineness of Hydraulic Cement by Air Permeability Apparatus
 T 154, Time of Setting of Hydraulic Cement Paste by Gillmore Needles
 T 162, Mechanical Mixing of Hydraulic Cement Pastes and Mortars of Plastic Consistency
 T 167, Compressive Strength of Hot Mix Asphalt
 T 176, Plastic Fines in Graded Aggregates and Soils by Use of the Sand Equivalent Test
 T 179, Effect of Heat and Air on Asphalt Materials (Thin-Film Oven Test)
 T 180, Moisture-Density Relations of Soils Using a 4.54-kg (10-lb) Rammer and a 457-mm
(18-in.) Drop
 T 186, Early Stiffening of Hydraulic Cement (Paste Method)
 T 190, Resistance R-Value and Expansion Pressure of Compacted Soils
 T 192, Fineness of Hydraulic Cement by the 45-μm (No. 325) Sieve
 T 193, The California Bearing Ratio
 T 196M/T 196, Air Content of Freshly Mixed Concrete by the Volumetric Method
 T 201, Kinematic Viscosity of Asphalts (Bitumens)
 T 202, Viscosity of Asphalts by Vacuum Capillary Viscometer
 T 209, Theoretical Maximum Specific Gravity (Gmm) and Density of Hot Mix Asphalt (HMA)
 T 228, Specific Gravity of Semi-Solid Asphalt Materials
 T 231, Capping Cylindrical Concrete Specimens
 T 240, Effect of Heat and Air on a Moving Film of Asphalt Binder (Rolling Thin-Film Oven
Test)
 T 245, Resistance to Plastic Flow of Asphalt Mixtures Using Marshall Apparatus
 T 246, Resistance to Deformation and Cohesion of Hot Mix Asphalt (HMA) by Means of
Hveem Apparatus
 T 247, Preparation of Test Specimens of Hot Mix Asphalt (HMA) by Means of California
Kneading Compactor
 T 300, Force Ductility Test of Asphalt Materials
 T 301, Elastic Recovery Test of Asphalt Materials by Means of a Ductilometer

TS-AMRL R 18-2 AASHTO

--``,```,,```,`,,,```,```,,````,-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---

© 2016 by the American Association of State

Copyright American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials
Provided by IHS under license with AASHTO Highway and
Licensee=Colorado Transportation
Department Officials. User=falls, dan
of Transporation/5971061001,
No reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS All rights reserved. Duplication Not
is aforviolation of applicable
Resale, 02/08/2017 law.
07:12:24 MST
 T 308, Determining the Asphalt Binder Content of Hot Mix Asphalt (HMA) by the
Ignition Method
 T 312, Preparing and Determining the Density of Asphalt Mixture Specimens by Means of the
Superpave Gyratory Compactor
 T 313, Determining the Flexural Creep Stiffness of Asphalt Binder Using the Bending Beam
Rheometer (BBR)
 T 314, Determining the Fracture Properties of Asphalt Binder in Direct Tension (DT)
 T 315, Determining the Rheological Properties of Asphalt Binder Using a Dynamic Shear
Rheometer (DSR)
 T 316, Viscosity Determination of Asphalt Binder Using Rotational Viscometer

2.2. ASTM Standards:

 C29/C29M, Standard Test Method for Bulk Density (“Unit Weight”) and Voids in Aggregate
 C31/C31M, Standard Practice for Making and Curing Concrete Test Specimens in the Field
 C39/C39M, Standard Test Method for Compressive Strength of Cylindrical Concrete
Specimens
 C67, Standard Test Methods for Sampling and Testing Brick and Structural Clay Tile
 C88, Standard Test Method for Soundness of Aggregates by Use of Sodium Sulfate or
Magnesium Sulfate
 C91/C91M, Standard Specification for Masonry Cement

--``,```,,```,`,,,```,```,,````,-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
 C109/C109M, Standard Test Method for Compressive Strength of Hydraulic Cement Mortars
(Using 2-in. or [50-mm] Cube Specimens)
 C115/C115M, Standard Test Method for Fineness of Portland Cement by the Turbidimeter
 C128, Standard Test Method for Density, Relative Density (Specific Gravity), and Absorption
of Fine Aggregate
 C131/C131M, Standard Test Method for Resistance to Degradation of Small-Size Coarse
Aggregate by Abrasion and Impact in the Los Angeles Machine
 C138/C138M, Standard Test Method for Density (Unit Weight), Yield, and Air Content
(Gravimetric) of Concrete
 C143/C143M, Standard Test Method for Slump of Hydraulic-Cement Concrete
 C173/C173M, Standard Test Method for Air Content of Freshly Mixed Concrete by the
Volumetric Method
 C185, Standard Test Method for Air Content of Hydraulic Cement Mortar
 C187, Standard Test Method for Amount of Water Required for Normal Consistency of
Hydraulic Cement Paste
 C191, Standard Test Methods for Time of Setting of Hydraulic Cement by Vicat Needle
 C204, Standard Test Methods for Fineness of Hydraulic Cement by Air-Permeability
Apparatus
 C230/C230M, Standard Specification for Flow Table for Use in Tests of Hydraulic Cement
 C231/C231M, Standard Test Method for Air Content of Freshly Mixed Concrete by the
Pressure Method
 C266, Standard Test Method for Time of Setting of Hydraulic-Cement Paste by Gillmore
Needles
 C305, Standard Practice for Mechanical Mixing of Hydraulic Cement Pastes and Mortars of
Plastic Consistency
 C430, Standard Test Method for Fineness of Hydraulic Cement by the 45-μm (No. 325) Sieve
 C451, Standard Test Method for Early Stiffening of Hydraulic Cement (Paste Method)
 C617/C617M, Standard Practice for Capping Cylindrical Concrete Specimens

TS-AMRL R 18-3 AASHTO

© 2016 by the American Association of State
Copyright American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials
Provided by IHS under license with AASHTO Highway and
Licensee=Colorado Transportation
Department Officials. User=falls, dan
of Transporation/5971061001,
No reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS All rights reserved. Duplication Not
is aforviolation of applicable
Resale, 02/08/2017 law.
07:12:24 MST
 C778, Standard Specification for Standard Sand
 C1072, Standard Test Methods for Measurement of Masonry Flexural Bond Strength
 D5/D5M, Standard Test Method for Penetration of Bituminous Materials
 D36/D36M, Standard Test Method for Softening Point of Bitumen (Ring-and-Ball Apparatus)
 D70, Standard Test Method for Density of Semi-Solid Bituminous Materials (Pycnometer
Method)
 D88, Standard Test Method for Saybolt Viscosity
 D92, Standard Test Method for Flash and Fire Points by Cleveland Open Cup Tester
 D113, Standard Test Method for Ductility of Bituminous Materials
 D139, Standard Test Method for Float Test for Bituminous Materials
 D244, Standard Test Methods and Practices for Emulsified Asphalts
 D422, Standard Test Method for Particle-Size Analysis of Soils
 D558, Standard Test Methods for Moisture-Density (Unit Weight) Relations of Soil-Cement
Mixtures
 D559, Standard Test Methods for Wetting and Drying Compacted Soil-Cement Mixtures
(withdrawn 2012)
 D560, Standard Test Methods for Freezing and Thawing Compacted Soil-Cement Mixtures
(withdrawn 2012)
 D698, Standard Test Methods for Laboratory Compaction Characteristics of Soil Using
Standard Effort (12400 ft-lbf/ft3 (600 kN-m/m3))
 D854, Standard Test Methods for Specific Gravity of Soil Solids by Water Pycnometer
 D1074, Standard Test Method for Compressive Strength of Bituminous Mixtures
 D1557, Standard Test Methods for Laboratory Compaction Characteristics of Soil Using
Modified Effort (56,000 ft-lbf/ft3 (2,700 kN-m/m3))
 D1560, Standard Test Methods for Resistance to Deformation and Cohesion of Bituminous
Mixtures by Means of Hveem Apparatus
 D1561/D1561M, Standard Practice for Preparation of Bituminous Mixture Test Specimens by
Means of California Kneading Compactor
 D1754/D1754M, Standard Test Method for Effects of Heat and Air on Asphaltic Materials
(Thin-Film Oven Test)
 D1856, Standard Test Method for Recovery of Asphalt From Solution by Abson Method
 D1883/D1883M, Standard Test Method for CBR (California Bearing Ratio) of Laboratory-
Compacted Soils
 D2041/D2041M, Standard Test Method for Theoretical Maximum Specific Gravity and
Density of Bituminous Paving Mixtures
 D2168, Standard Test Methods for Calibration of Laboratory Mechanical-Rammer Soil
Compactors
 D2170/D2170M, Standard Test Method for Kinematic Viscosity of Asphalts (Bitumens)
 D2171/D2171M, Standard Test Method for Viscosity of Asphalts by Vacuum Capillary
Viscometer
 D2419, Standard Test Method for Sand Equivalent Value of Soils and Fine Aggregate
 D2844/D2844M, Standard Test Method for Resistance R-Value and Expansion Pressure of
Compacted Soils
 D2850, Standard Test Method for Unconsolidated-Undrained Triaxial Compression Test on
Cohesive Soils
 D2872, Standard Test Method for Effect of Heat and Air on a Moving Film of Asphalt
(Rolling Thin-Film Oven Test)

TS-AMRL
--``,```,,```,`,,,```,```,,````,-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---

R 18-4 AASHTO
© 2016 by the American Association of State
Copyright American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials
Provided by IHS under license with AASHTO Highway and
Licensee=Colorado Transportation
Department Officials. User=falls, dan
of Transporation/5971061001,
No reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS All rights reserved. Duplication Not
is aforviolation of applicable
Resale, 02/08/2017 law.
07:12:24 MST
 D3143/D3143M, Standard Test Method for Flash Point of Cutback Asphalt with Tag Open-
Cup Apparatus
 D4318, Standard Test Methods for Liquid Limit, Plastic Limit, and Plasticity Index of Soils
 D4402/D4402M, Standard Test Method for Viscosity Determination of Asphalt at Elevated
Temperatures Using a Rotational Viscometer
 D4753, Standard Guide for Evaluating, Selecting, and Specifying Balances and Standard
Masses for Use in Soil, Rock, and Construction Materials Testing
 D4829, Standard Test Method for Expansion Index of Soils
 D6084/D6084M, Standard Test Method for Elastic Recovery of Bituminous Materials by
Ductilometer
 D6307, Standard Test Method for Asphalt Content of Hot-Mix Asphalt by Ignition Method
 D6521, Standard Practice for Accelerated Aging of Asphalt Binder Using a Pressurized Aging
Vessel (PAV)
 D6648, Standard Test Method for Determining the Flexural Creep Stiffness of Asphalt Binder
Using the Bending Beam Rheometer (BBR)
 D6723, Standard Test Method for Determining the Fracture Properties of Asphalt Binder in
Direct Tension (DT)
 D6925, Standard Test Method for Preparation and Determination of the Relative Density of

--``,```,,```,`,,,```,```,,````,-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
Asphalt Mix Specimens by Means of the Superpave Gyratory Compactor
 D6926, Standard Practice for Preparation of Bituminous Specimens Using Marshall
Apparatus
 D6927, Standard Test Method for Marshall Stability and Flow of Bituminous Mixtures
 D7000, Standard Test Method for Sweep Test of Bituminous Emulsion Surface Treatment
Samples
 D7115, Standard Test Method for Measurement of Superpave Gyratory Compactor (SGC)
Internal Angle of Gyration Using Simulated Loading
 D7175, Standard Test Method for Determining the Rheological Properties of Asphalt Binder
Using a Dynamic Shear Rheometer
 E11, Standard Specification for Woven Wire Test Sieve Cloth and Test Sieves
 E77, Standard Test Method for Inspection and Verification of Thermometers

3. TERMINOLOGY
3.1. calibration—a process that, under specified conditions, establishes metrological traceability by
determining: (1) the relation between the quantity values provided by measurement standards and
the corresponding indications from a measuring instrument or system, and (2) the resulting
measurement uncertainty (Note 1).
Note 1—This definition for calibration and the following definitions for check, standardization,
traceability, uncertainty, and verification of calibration are based on the definitions in R 61.

3.1.1. Examples—analytical balances (measurement instrument) and dynamic shear rheometer

(measurement system).

3.1.2. Discussion—the purpose of calibration is to establish the traceability of a measurement.

Uncertainty estimates obtained during calibration are used to judge if an instrument is suitable for
its intended purpose. There is a need to re-establish traceability or recalibrate only when
instrument measurements drift out of control (as determined through verification of calibration).

3.2. check—a specific type of inspection and/or measurement performed on equipment and materials
to indicate compliance or otherwise with stated criteria.

TS-AMRL R 18-5 AASHTO

3.2.2. Discussion—Stated criteria can be dimensional tolerances.

3.3. date—the month, day, and year in which an event takes place.

3.4. maintenance—a regularly scheduled preventive measure taken to preserve the effective working
condition of test equipment.

3.5. measurement standard—The embodiment of the definition of a given quantity, with a stated value
and measurement uncertainty, used as a reference. 2 This term is often called “reference standard.”

3.6. metrological traceability—the property of a result of a measurement whereby it can be related to

stated references, usually national or international standards, through a documented, unbroken
chain of calibrations, each contributing to the measurement uncertainty.

3.6.1. Discussion—There is a need for traceable measurements. Measurements, not the instrument, can
be traceable. Measurement traceability is established through calibration. Measurement
traceability is maintained through verification of calibration (a regular check of instrument output
using a control standard).

3.7. quality management system (QMS)—the organizational structure, staff responsibilities, policies,
standard operating procedures, processes, and records that assist the laboratory in achieving its
quality objectives.

3.8. standardization—a process that determines (1) the correction to be applied to the result of a
measuring instrument, measuring system, material measure, or measurement standard when its
--``,```,,```,`,,,```,```,,````,-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---

values are compared with the values realized by standards, or (2) the adjustment to be applied to a
piece of equipment when its performance is compared with that of an accepted standard or
process.

3.8.1. Discussion—Standardization in case (1) is a simplified form of calibration that estimates

systematic error but does not identify random error. Standardization, therefore, does not address
all of the elements of uncertainty of measurement and does not lead to traceable measurements.
An example of case (2) standardization is adjusting the number of blows of a mechanically
operated hammer so it applies the energy equivalent to that of a manually operated hammer.

3.9. subcontracting—the practice of a testing agency utilizing another testing agency to perform testing
due to unforeseen circumstances such as temporary increased workload, personnel shortage,
equipment malfunction, damage to facilities, or other reasons.

3.9.1. Discussion—Using an outside agency for the purchase or calibration of equipment is not
considered subcontracting.

3.10. top management—the most senior level of laboratory management personnel with the authority to
make decisions on policies and allocation of resources.

3.11. uncertainty—a parameter associated with the result of a measurement that defines the range of the
values that could be attributed to the measured quantity.

3.11.1. Discussion—The uncertainty of a measurement is required in order to establish its traceability.

The uncertainty estimates obtained during calibration are used to judge if an instrument is suitable
for its intended purpose.

TS-AMRL R 18-6 AASHTO

Copyright American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials
Provided by IHS under license with AASHTO © 2016 by the American Association of State Highway and
Licensee=Colorado Transportation
Department Officials. User=falls, dan
of Transporation/5971061001,
No reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS All rights reserved. Duplication Not
is aforviolation of applicable
Resale, 02/08/2017 law.
07:12:24 MST
3.12. verification of calibration—a process that establishes whether the results of a previously
calibrated measurement instrument, measurement system, or material measure are stable.

3.12.1. Discussion—Verification of calibration is used to maintain the traceability of a measurement and

to determine when to recalibrate. Control charts are often used to plot the results and determine
whether instrument measurements have drifted out of control.

4. SIGNIFICANCE AND USE

4.1. This document provides guidance to laboratories in the establishment and implementation of a
quality management system. By use of the concepts in this document, a laboratory may prepare
policies, procedures, and records that describe the elements and functions of its quality
management system.

4.2. This document is not intended to prescribe the methods by which a laboratory achieves the desired
level of quality, but does provide acceptable approaches.

4.3. This document is intended to be used as a basis for laboratory assessment and accreditation along
with the policies and procedures of an assessment or accreditation body such as The AASHTO
Accreditation Program Procedures Manual for the Accreditation of Construction Materials
Testing Laboratories.
--``,```,,```,`,,,```,```,,````,-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---

4.4. The user is cautioned that a QMS prepared by following this document can only serve a useful
purpose if it describes or references procedures that are practiced on a routine basis by the
laboratory. A QMS only describes the elements of the system and how they are intended to be
implemented. It is not the existence but the implementation of an effective quality management
system that is important.

5. MANAGEMENT REQUIREMENTS
5.1. Quality Management System (QMS):

5.1.1. The laboratory shall establish, implement, and maintain a quality management system (QMS)
appropriate to the scope of its activities. The QMS shall be available for use and understood by
laboratory staff.
Note 2—A QMS may be documented and distributed in hard copy or electronic format.
Note 3—Examples of some QMS documents are provided in the Appendix. The laboratory may
establish methods other than those shown in the Appendix to meet QMS requirements.

5.2. Document Control:

5.2.1. Each QMS document shall indicate its preparation date. When a document is revised, the date of
revision shall be indicated on the document.

5.2.2. Test Methods, Practices, Procedures, and Specifications—The laboratory shall maintain copies of
standards for the testing performed and shall ensure that the procedures are the most current and
are readily accessible to the employees performing the testing.

5.3. Organization:

5.3.1. The legal name and address of the laboratory—and that of the main office or company, if
different—and any other information needed to identify the organization shall be documented.

TS-AMRL R 18-7 AASHTO

Copyright American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials
Provided by IHS under license with AASHTO © 2016 by the American Association of State Highway and
Licensee=Colorado Transportation
Department Officials. User=falls, dan
of Transporation/5971061001,
No reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS All rights reserved. Duplication Not
is aforviolation of applicable
Resale, 02/08/2017 law.
07:12:24 MST
5.3.2. The ownership and management structure of the laboratory shall be documented. Names,
affiliations, and positions of principal officers and directors shall be listed.

5.3.3. The laboratory shall maintain an organization chart showing relevant internal organizational
components, including positions and names, which are part of the organization. The organization
chart shall clearly define relationships with other partner organizations where applicable.

5.4. Staff:

5.4.1. The laboratory shall maintain a position description for each technical operational position shown
on the laboratory’s organization chart. Position descriptions shall identify the position and include
a description of the duties, required skills, and education and experience associated with the
position.

5.4.2. The laboratory shall maintain a brief biographical sketch, noting the education, work experience,
licensure, certifications, and current position for each supervisory technical staff.

5.4.3. Technical Manager—The laboratory shall have a technical manager (however named) who has
overall responsibility for the technical operations of the laboratory. In addition, the laboratory
shall nominate an individual to serve in the technical manager’s absence.

5.4.4. QMS Management—The laboratory shall designate a person(s) having responsibility for
determining whether quality management system activities are being implemented by laboratory
staff. This individual(s) shall have direct access to top management (Note 4).
Note 4—This individual(s) may have other responsibilities (e.g., laboratory manager).

5.5. Technician Training and Evaluation:

5.5.1. The laboratory shall maintain a procedure that describes the method used to ensure that laboratory
personnel are trained to perform tests in accordance with standard procedures. In addition to the
description of training methods, the document shall indicate what position or employee is
responsible for the laboratory training program and the maintenance of training records (see
Figure X1.1).
Note 5—There may be several different methods employed for differing levels of staff
experience, including (1) on-the-job apprentice training (one-on-one) for new employees with
little or no experience in laboratory or inspection work; (2) formal in-house training sessions for
certification, rating, or competency evaluation; and (3) training by external organizations. An
individual with prior experience performing a specific test need only have competency evaluated
by the laboratory (see Section 5.5.2).

5.5.2. The laboratory shall maintain a procedure describing the method used to evaluate staff
competency to ensure that each technician is qualified to perform the tests they perform in
accordance with standard procedures. This procedure shall include the frequency of competency
evaluations for each technician and indicate the position or employee responsible for evaluating
staff competency and maintaining records (see Figure X1.2). The frequency selected shall be
based on experience and competency of each technician.
Note 6—Multiple intervals may be established based on the experience of the technician being
evaluated and the methods used for administering the competency evaluation activities. For
example, an experienced technician who consistently performs at a high level of competency may
not need to have their competency evaluated as frequently as a less-experienced technician who is
still actively learning how to perform the sampling and testing activities.

5.5.3. Evaluations of staff competency shall be conducted through observation of test demonstration by
the laboratory technicians for the tests they are qualified to perform. The demonstrations shall be
evaluated either by in-house personnel, a representative of a certification program, a representative

--``,```,,```,`,,,```,```,,````,-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---

TS-AMRL R 18-8 AASHTO

5.5.4. The laboratory shall maintain records of technician training and competency evaluation activities.
The records shall include the following information:

5.5.4.1. Test method designation for which the technician was evaluated;

5.5.4.2. Date on which competence was evaluated;

5.5.4.3. Name of the individual who evaluated the technician’s competency; and

5.5.4.4. A field for recording comments about the training or competency evaluation activity.

5.5.5. If an external certification or assessment program is used as a means of evaluating competency,

the date of the evaluation (referred to in Section 5.5.4.2) and the name of the evaluator (referred to
in Section 5.5.4.3) shall be reported on the competency evaluation record.

5.6. Internal Audits:

5.6.1. The laboratory shall maintain a document describing the scope of internal audits. Internal audits
shall verify that the laboratory’s operations continue to comply with its policies and procedures
and the requirements of this standard (see Figure X1.3).

--``,```,,```,`,,,```,```,,````,-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
5.6.2. The document shall include the frequency of the reviews and identification of the individual(s)
responsible for the review. The internal audit program shall address all elements of the quality
management system and shall be conducted at least every 12 months by trained personnel
independent of the activity being audited, where possible.

5.6.3. Findings from internal audits shall be recorded (see Figure X1.4).

5.7. Management Reviews:

5.7.1. The laboratory’s top management shall review its QMS at planned intervals at least every 12
months to ensure its continuing adequacy and effectiveness in satisfying the relevant requirements,
including those specified in this standard. The results of the management reviews shall be
recorded (see Figures X1.5 and X1.6). The following information shall be included as part of the
management reviews:

5.7.1.1. Results of internal and external audits;

5.7.1.2. Proficiency sample performance;

5.7.1.3. Status of corrective actions;

5.7.1.4. Personnel staffing changes and training needs;

5.7.1.5. Updates to QMS policies and procedures; and

5.7.1.6. Complaints.

5.8. Corrective Action:

5.8.1. The laboratory shall maintain a procedure for implementing corrective action when
nonconforming work or departures from policies and procedures have been discovered (Note 7).

TS-AMRL R 18-9 AASHTO

5.8.2. The laboratory shall maintain a procedure used in responding to customer complaints (see
Figure X1.8). Records of customer complaints and the resulting actions shall be maintained.

5.9. Records Retention:

5.9.1. The laboratory shall establish a policy and procedure for the retention, storage, and disposal of
records. The policy shall ensure that records pertaining to the following activities are retained for a
minimum of 5 years:

5.9.1.1. External assessments;

5.9.1.2. Internal audits;

5.9.1.3. Management reviews;

5.9.1.4. Proficiency sample testing;

5.9.1.5. Technician training and evaluations;

5.9.1.6. Personnel;

5.9.1.7. Test data and reports;

--``,```,,```,`,,,```,```,,````,-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---

5.9.1.8. Equipment calibrations, standardizations, checks, and maintenance;

5.9.1.9. Customer complaints; and

5.9.1.10. Corrective actions.

Note 8—Although a 5-year retention schedule is adequate in some instances, there are many
circumstances when a longer retention period may be advantageous to the laboratory. Records
concerning the calibrations, standardizations, checks, and maintenance of equipment are an
example. Retention schedules of this type usually require such records to be held throughout the
useful life of the equipment.

6. TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS
6.1. Equipment Lists:

6.1.1. Inventory List—The laboratory shall maintain an inventory list of major sampling, testing,
calibration, standardization and check equipment, and measurement standards. The list shall
include, where available, the name, date placed in service, manufacturer, and model and serial
number.
Note 9—A unique identification number assigned by the laboratory or other unique identifying
information may be substituted for the model and serial number if this is the practice normally
followed by the laboratory.

TS-AMRL R 18-10 AASHTO

Copyright American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials
Provided by IHS under license with AASHTO © 2016 by the American Association of State Highway and
Licensee=Colorado Transportation
Department Officials. User=falls, dan
of Transporation/5971061001,
No reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS All rights reserved. Duplication Not
is aforviolation of applicable
Resale, 02/08/2017 law.
07:12:24 MST
Note 10—Major equipment includes all equipment that is normally amortized by a laboratory,
such as shakers, physical or chemical testing machines, balances, baths, ovens, microscopes, and
computing equipment dedicated to testing. Equipment such as chairs, desks, and file cabinets may
be excluded. Major equipment does not usually include expendable items such as miscellaneous
glassware, sieves, molds, and viscometers.

6.1.2. Equipment Calibrations, Standardizations, Checks, and Maintenance List(s):

6.1.2.1. The laboratory shall maintain a list(s) giving a general description of equipment and measurement
standards that requires calibrations, standardizations, checks, and maintenance. For each item the
list(s) shall include the interval of calibrations, standardizations, checks, or maintenance and either
a reference to the procedure used or a statement that an external agency is used to complete the
activity (Note 11) (see Figure X1.9).
Note 11—When standard procedures are used, the standard designation should be referenced
(e.g., for an aggregate unit weight measure, T 19M/T 19 or C29/C29M would be referenced, if
used). When the procedure used has been prepared by the laboratory, the name or identifying
number of the in-house procedure should be referenced. If the work is performed by an outside
agency, that should be indicated rather than the name of a procedure.

6.2. General Equipment Procedures:

6.2.1. The laboratory shall have a general procedure that describes the method for ensuring that the
calibration, standardizations, checks, and maintenance are performed for all required equipment
and measurement standards at the specified intervals. This procedure shall include the name of the
individual(s) or position(s) responsible for ensuring that these activities are performed, and
procedures for handling equipment that is newly acquired, removed from service, moved to a new
location, or defective (see Figure X1.10). The general procedure shall describe how the laboratory
meets the following requirements:

6.2.1.1. The laboratory shall calibrate, standardize, check, and perform maintenance on significant
equipment associated with tests the laboratory performs (Note 12). As a minimum, the applicable
equipment listed in Tables A1.1 through A1.9 shall be included.
Note 12—Refer to R 61 for guidance on performing equipment calibrations, standardizations,
and checks.

6.2.1.2. Equipment and measurement standards that have been removed from service and newly acquired
equipment and measurement standards without a manufacturer’s certification shall be calibrated,
standardized, or checked before being placed in service. Manufacturer’s certification records shall
conform to the requirements of Section 6.5 in order to be considered as an acceptable calibration
record.

6.2.1.3. Equipment and measurement standards that may be affected by moving them to a new location or
environment shall be calibrated, standardized, or checked before being placed in service.
Examples of equipment that may be affected by a move include, but are not limited to, balances,
compression machines, mechanical compaction equipment, and sensitive measurement equipment.

6.2.1.4. Measurement standards used to perform calibrations, standardizations, and checks shall be
calibrated or shall have a certified value reported by the manufacturer. The calibration record shall
include estimates of measurement uncertainty.

6.2.1.5. Measurement standards shall be calibrated by a calibration agency accredited to ISO/IEC 17025.

6.2.1.5.1. Manufacturers that perform calibrations on the equipment they produce do not need to maintain
accreditation for the activity of performing calibrations.

TS-AMRL --``,```,,```,`,,,```,```,,````,-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`--- R 18-11 AASHTO

6.3. Procedures for Individual Pieces of Equipment:

--``,```,,```,`,,,```,```,,````,-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
6.3.1. The laboratory shall have detailed written procedures for all in-house calibrations,
standardizations, checks, and maintenance activities not addressed in standards or operating
instructions (Note 11). These procedures shall be uniquely identified, shall describe the equipment
required to perform the calibrations, standardizations, checks, or maintenance, and shall include a
step-by-step procedure for performing the activity (see Figures X1.11 to X1.18).

6.3.1.1. If a piece of laboratory testing equipment is used over a range of measurements (e.g.,
thermometer, dial indicator), the calibration or standardization procedure shall specify taking
several measurements over that range unless otherwise specified by (1) the manufacturer of the
equipment, or (2) in a consensus calibration standard that is being referenced.

6.3.1.2. The laboratory shall establish maintenance procedures and intervals based on frequency of use and
risk of equipment damage under normal operating conditions. The laboratory shall refer to
manufacturer’s instructions, where possible, to establish procedures for performing maintenance.
If manufacturer’s instructions for maintenance are available, they shall be referenced on the in-
house maintenance procedure.

6.4. Equipment Intervals:

6.4.1. Applicable equipment and measurement standards shall be calibrated, standardized, checked, and
maintained at the intervals specified in the laboratory’s QMS. The laboratory shall establish
intervals according to the following guidelines:

6.4.1.1. The intervals specified by the laboratory shall be no greater than those indicated in Tables A1.1
through A1.9 unless such equipment is calibrated, standardized, checked, or receives maintenance
before each use. Calibration, standardization, and check intervals may be extended provided the
laboratory has documented evidence to show that the conformance of the equipment to the
specification requirements is stable (Notes 13, 14, and 15).
Note 13—The intervals for the calibration of measurement equipment may be extended provided
that verification of calibration data obtained with frequent measurement checks using control
standards indicates that equipment measurement results are stable over time. Process-control
charts are commonly used to display the data.
Note 14—Equipment check intervals may be extended provided that equipment check data
indicate that equipment wear is predictable over time.
Note 15—Analysis of the verification of calibration, standardization, and check data for some
equipment may indicate that intervals should be decreased to ensure that the equipment
consistently meets the specification requirements or is removed from service when appropriate.

6.4.1.2. When a maximum interval for a specific piece of equipment is specified in a standard, the interval
specified by the laboratory shall not exceed this interval unless the equipment is calibrated,
standardized, checked, or receives maintenance before each use.

6.5. Equipment Records:

6.5.1. The laboratory shall maintain calibration, standardization, check, and maintenance records for all
equipment and measurement standards specified in the QMS. Such records shall include:

TS-AMRL R 18-12 AASHTO

6.5.1.2. All information specifically required by the standard in which the equipment is used;

6.5.1.3. The measurement uncertainty for any equipment where calibration is specifically required by this
standard or the standard in which the equipment is used;

6.5.1.4. A description of the equipment calibrated, standardized, checked, or maintained, including model
and serial number or other acceptable identification (Note 9);

6.5.1.5. The date the work was done;

6.5.1.6. An identification of the individual who performed the work;

6.5.1.7. Identification of the name of the calibration, standardization, check, or maintenance procedure
used; and

6.5.1.8. A verifiable statement or symbol regarding the accreditation of the calibration agency, where
applicable;

6.5.1.9. An identification of any reference equipment or measurement standards used to perform the
calibration, standardization, or check, including serial numbers, laboratory numbers, or other
identification (see Note 9).

6.6. Sample Management:

6.6.1. The laboratory shall have a procedure for the storage, retention, and disposal of test samples
(see Figure X1.19).
Note 16—In this context, the term “storage” refers to sample placement and handling before
testing. The term “retention” refers to sample placement and handling after testing.

6.6.2. The laboratory shall have a procedure for identifying test samples. The identification shall be
retained throughout the life of the sample in the laboratory.

6.7. Test Records and Reports:

6.7.1. The laboratory shall have a document that describes methods used by the laboratory to produce
test records and to prepare, check, and amend test reports. The document shall identify the
individual(s) responsible for maintaining test records and reports and shall describe the
distribution of test reports (see Figure X1.20).

6.7.2. Test Records—The laboratory shall maintain test records that contain sufficient information to
permit verification of any test reports. Records pertaining to testing shall include original
observations, calculations, derived data, and an identification of personnel involved in sampling
and testing. The laboratory shall prepare test reports that clearly and accurately present the
following information:

6.7.2.1. Identification of the report and the date issued;

--``,```,,```,`,,,```,```,,````,-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---

6.7.2.2. Description, identification, and condition of the test sample;

6.7.2.3. Identification of the standard test method used;

6.7.2.4. Test results and other pertinent data required by the standard test method;

TS-AMRL R 18-13 AASHTO

6.7.2.6. Identification of any test results obtained from tests performed by a subcontractor; and

6.7.2.7. Name of the person(s) accepting technical responsibility for the test report (if applicable).

6.7.3. In addition to the requirements listed in Section 6.7.2.1, the following information shall be
available and traceable to the test reports:

6.7.3.1. Name and address of the testing laboratory;

6.7.3.2. Name and address of the client or identification of the project;

6.7.3.3. Date of receipt of the test sample; and

6.7.3.4. Date(s) of test performance.

6.7.4. The procedure for amending reports shall require that the previously existing report be clearly
referenced when an amendment is made. The references shall establish a clear audit trail from the
latest issuance or deletion to the original report and its supporting data.
--``,```,,```,`,,,```,```,,````,-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---

6.8. Subcontracting—The laboratory shall maintain a document describing the policies that the
laboratory follows relative to subcontracting, if it engages in such activities. These policies shall
include procedures followed by the laboratory in selecting competent subcontractors and reporting
the results of testing performed by subcontractors.

6.9. Assuring the Quality of Results:

6.9.1. The laboratory shall have procedures for monitoring the validity of test results. The monitoring
shall be planned and may include one or more of the following:

6.9.1.1. Participation in external assessment programs (Note 17);

6.9.1.2. Participation in proficiency sample or interlaboratory comparison testing (Note 17); and

6.9.1.3. Retesting of retained items.

Note 17—The AASHTO Materials Reference Laboratory (AMRL) and the Cement and Concrete
Reference Laboratory (CCRL), located in Frederick, Maryland, conduct on-site assessment and
proficiency sample programs that the laboratory may use.

6.9.2. Records—The laboratory shall retain results of the monitoring activities, including the steps
taken to determine the root cause of any nonconformities and the corrective actions taken.

7. KEYWORDS
7.1. Calibration; check; construction materials testing; equipment maintenance; internal audit; quality
management system; standardization.

TS-AMRL R 18-14 AASHTO

Table A1.1—General Testing Equipment

Max. Interval
Equipment Requirement (months)
Mechanical Shakers Check Sieving Thoroughness 12
Ovens Standardize Thermometric Device 12
Coarse Sieves (Openings ≥4.75 mm) Check Physical Condition and Dimensions of Openings 12
Fine Sieves (Openings <4.75 mm) Check Physical Condition 12
Specimen Molds Check Critical Dimensions 12
General Purpose Balances and Masses Standardize 12
Thermometers Standardize 12
Analytical Balances and Masses Calibrate 12
Calipers Standardize 12
Vacuum/Pressure Measurement Devices Standardize 12
(Bourdon Gauges, Pressure Manometers, Digital
Vacuum Gauges, and Electronic Pressure Transducers)
Length Measurement Devices Standardize 12
Compression, Loading, or Tensile Testing Devices Standardize 12

Table A1.2—Aggregate Testing Equipment

--``,```,,```,`,,,```,```,,````,-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
Test Method Max. Interval
Equipment (AASHTO/ASTM) Requirement (months)
Unit Weight Measures T 19M/T 19/ Standardize 12
C29/C29M
Sulfate Ovens T 104/C88 Check Rate of Evaporation 12
Sulfate Soundness Sample Containers T 104/C88 Check Physical Condition 12
L.A. Machines T 96/C131 Check RPM and Critical Dimensions 24
Steel Balls T 96/C131 Check Individual Weight and Charge Weight 24
Conical Molds, Tampers T 84/C128 Check Critical Dimensions 24
Specific Gravity Flasks T 84/C128 Standardize Volume 12
Uncompacted Void Measures T 304/C1252 Standardize Volume 12

TS-AMRL R 18-15 AASHTO

Table A1.4—Asphalt Mixtures Testing Equipment

Test Method Max. Interval
Equipment (AASHTO/ASTM) Requirement (months)
Mechanical Compactors R 68 Standardize 36
CA Kneading Compactors T 247/D1561 Standardize 24
T 246, T 247/
Follower, Calibration Cylinders Check Critical Dimensions 12
D1560, D1561
Manual Compaction Hammers, Check Critical Dimensions,
T 245/D6926, D6927 12
Breaking Heads Check Mass of Hammer

--``,```,,```,`,,,```,```,,````,-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
Plungers T 167/D1074 Check Critical Dimensions 12
Standardize Ram Pressure, Frequency of
Gyratory Compactors T 312/D6925 12
Gyration, LVDT
Gyratory Compactors T 312 Standardize Internal Angle of Gyration 12
Standardize External or Internal Angle of
Gyratory Compactors D6925 12
Gyration
Ram Faces, Base Plate Faces T 312/D7115 Check Critical Dimensions 12
Ignition Oven Internal Balances T 308/D6307 Standardize 12
Specific Gravity Flasks, Pycnometers T 209/D2041 Standardize 12

TS-AMRL R 18-16 AASHTO

Table A1.6—Portland Cement Concrete Testing Equipment

Test Method Max. Interval
Equipment (AASHTO/ASTM) Requirement (months)
Unit Weight Measures T 121M/T 121/ Standardize 12
C138/C138M
Air Meters (pressure type) T 152/ Standardize 3a
C231/C231M
Air Meters (volumetric type) T 196 Standardize 12a
C173/C173M
Capping Materials T 231/C617 Check Strength 3
Retainers (Retaining Rings) C1231 Check Planeness 12
Slump Cones T 119M/T 119/ Check Critical Dimensions 12
C143/C143M
Metallic Reusable Molds T 23/C31 Check Critical Dimensions 12
Single Use Molds T 23/C31 Check Dimensions of Each Shipment —
Recording Thermometers M 201/C511 Standardize 6
Bearing Blocks T 22/C39 Check Planeness 12
a
The individual test methods specify conditions that require restandardization, such as changes in elevation and rough handling.

TS-AMRL R 18-17
--``,```,,```,`,,,```,```,,````,-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
AASHTO
© 2016 by the American Association of State
Copyright American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials
Provided by IHS under license with AASHTO Highway and
Licensee=Colorado Transportation
Department Officials. User=falls, dan
of Transporation/5971061001,
No reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS All rights reserved. Duplication Not
is aforviolation of applicable
Resale, 02/08/2017 law.
07:12:24 MST
Table A1.7—Hydraulic Cement Testing Equipment
Test Method Max. Interval
Equipment (AASHTO/ASTM) Requirement (months)
Recording Thermometers M 201/C511 Standardize 6
Storage Water M 201/C511 Check for Lime Saturation 6
No. 325 Sieves T 192/C430 Clean after 5 Determinations, Standardize —
after 100 Determinations
No. 325 Nozzles T 192/C430 Check Flow Rate 6
Bearing Blocks T 106M/T 106/ Check Planeness 12
C109/C109M
Wagner Turbidimeters T 98M/T 98 Standardize 6
C115/C115M
Standard Sand — Check Each New Shipment for —
Conformance to C778
Air-Permeability Apparatuses T 153/C204 Standardize Using NIST 114 30
Flow Tables M 152M/M 152/ Standardize Flow Resultsa 30

--``,```,,```,`,,,```,```,,````,-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
C230/C230M
Air Content Measures T 137/C185 Standardizea 30
Cube Molds and Tampers T 106M/T 106/ Check Critical Dimensions and Physical 30
C109/C109M Conditiona
Vicat Apparatuses and Vicat Rings T 129, T 131, T 186/ Check Physical Condition, Critical 30
C187, C191, C451 Dimensions, and Massa
Gillmore Test Apparatuses T 154/C266 Check Physical Condition, Critical 30
Dimensions, and Massa
Mechanical Mixing Apparatuses T 162/C305 Check Critical Clearances and Speedsa 30
Water-Retention Apparatuses C91 Check Critical Dimensionsa 30
a
The equipment evaluation provided by CCRL during their routine inspection satisfies this requirement.

Table A1.8—Masonry Testing Equipment

Test Method Max. Interval
Equipment (AASHTO/ASTM) Requirement (months)
Micrometer C67 Standardize 12
Air Content Measures T 137/C185 Standardizea 30
M 152M/M 152/
Flow Tables Standardize Flow Resultsa 30
C230/C230M
a
Water-Retention Apparatus C91 Check Critical Dimensions 30
Water Retention C91 Standardize Vacuum 12
Cube Molds and Tampers T 106M/T 106/ Check Physical Condition and
30
C109/C109M Critical Dimensionsa
Bearing Blocks T 106/C109, C780 Check Planeness 12
Flexural Bond Apparatus C1072 Standardize 12
Mixers T 162/C305 Check Paddle to Bowl Clearance 24
Recording Thermometer(s) M 201/C511 Standardize 6
a
The equipment evaluation provided by CCRL during their routine inspection satisfies this requirement.

TS-AMRL R 18-18 AASHTO

Copyright American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials
Provided by IHS under license with AASHTO Licensee=Colorado Department of Transporation/5971061001, User=falls, dan
No reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS Not for Resale, 02/08/2017 07:12:24 MST
Table A1.9—Equipment Maintenance
Test Method
Equipment (AASHTO/ASTM) Max. Interval (months)
Rolling Thin-Film Ovens T 240/D2872 12
Mechanical Marshall Compactors T 245 12
California Kneading Compactors T 190, T 247/D1561, D2844 12
Gyratory Compactors T 312/D6925 12
Mechanical Compactors T 99, T 180/D698, D1557 12
Compression Machines Where Applicable 12
Mechanical Shakers Where Applicable 12
Curing Tanks/Curing Facilities M 201/C511 12

Note A1—There may be more items added to the laboratory’s list of equipment that require
maintenance. Maintenance activities will typically involve lubricating, tightening fittings,
cleaning, replacing fluids, checking and replacing damaged or worn parts, etc. These activities will
vary based on the type of equipment, how often the equipment is used, the manufacturer’s
recommendations, etc.

APPENDIX 3
(Nonmandatory Information)

X1. TYPICAL EXAMPLES OF DOCUMENTS, FORMS, AND STANDARD

OPERATING PROCEDURES

(Date)

TRAINING PROGRAM FOR TESTING TECHNICIANS

The Laboratory Manager is responsible for the training program and maintenance of all training records. Copies of the results of all
training shall be distributed to and retained by the Office Manager. Training records shall be retained in the Office Manager’s office. All
materials technicians shall be trained prior to performing test procedures not previously performed. The following training procedures
shall be followed for each test:

1. The trainee shall obtain a copy of the applicable test procedure and report form.

2. The trainee shall study the test procedure and test report forms to become familiar with the equipment, terminology, test procedure,
calculations, and test reports.

3. A qualified technician shall demonstrate the test procedure for the trainee.
--``,```,,```,`,,,```,```,,````,-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---

4. The trainee shall repeatedly perform the test procedure under the guidance of a qualified technician until proficiency is obtained.

5. The Laboratory Supervisor shall observe the trainee demonstrating the procedure and document that the trainee has demonstrated the
ability to perform the test procedure, if it is performed properly, by making an entry in the trainee’s training record.

Figure X1.1—Description of Testing Technician Training Program

TS-AMRL R 18-19 AASHTO

METHOD FOR REVIEWING TECHNICIAN’S COMPETENCY

The Laboratory Supervisor is responsible for evaluating the testing technician’s competency at least once every 12 months by requiring each
technician to demonstrate the AASHTO and/or ASTM test procedures for which he/she has been trained to perform. Technicians with more
than 6 years of satisfactory testing experience at the company shall be evaluated every 24 months for each test they perform. Newly hired
technicians shall be evaluated after their first 6 months and prior to their 12-month competency evaluation for the tests they perform
routinely. If a technician does not routinely perform a test, it may not be necessary to evaluate his or her competency to perform the test
every 12 months. However, the technician’s competency shall be evaluated prior to performing the test. The Laboratory Manager is
responsible for evaluating the Laboratory Supervisor’s competency for performing all tests performed at least once every 24 months. Copies
of the results of all competency evaluations shall be maintained by the Office Manager in the employee competency evaluation files.

The records shall include the identification of the test demonstrated, the date of the demonstration, the name of testing personnel, the name of
the evaluator, and the results of the evaluation (satisfactory or unsatisfactory along with any other relevant comments). The Supervisor shall
sign each entry on the evaluation record.

If an unsatisfactory result is recorded for a specific test, the Supervisor shall review all observed deviations from the standard AASHTO or
ASTM procedure with the testing technician, observe the technician redemonstrate the test procedure, and record the results as indicated
above.

Figure X1.2—Method for Reviewing Testing Personnel Competency

(Date)

INTERNAL AUDIT PROCEDURE

1. The Quality Manager and/or his designee shall audit a representative sampling of each of the following policies, procedures, and
records every 12 months to ensure that established quality procedures are being followed:

a) QMS policies and procedures, including document control

b) Technician training records
c) Technician competency evaluation records
d) Previous internal audit findings and corrective actions
e) Management review findings and corrective actions
f) Customer complaints and corrective actions
g) Records retention
h) Equipment inventory list
i) Equipment calibration, standardization, check, and maintenance lists and records
j) Test records and reports
k) Proficiency Sample Reports

2. Records, reports, corrective actions, etc. are reviewed to ensure completeness and conformance to the requirements of R 18 and any
other applicable quality management system standards, and to ensure that established laboratory policies and procedures are being
followed. Such documentation is also checked to ensure a minimum of 5 years retention. Access to current AASHTO and ASTM
literature is also evaluated.
3. Quality management system policies and procedures are reviewed to ensure conformance to the requirements of R 18 and any other
applicable quality management system standards.
4. Interviews with applicable staff shall be included during the audit to ensure that QMS policies and procedures accurately reflect
current practices.
5. The results of the internal audit shall be recorded on the Internal Audit Check Sheet and any additional pages as needed to identify
nonconformities and describe the planned corrective actions.
6. The Quality Manager shall discuss any findings and improvement opportunities noted with appropriate staff. Corrective actions
will be taken where applicable.
7. The Quality Manager shall maintain a file containing all documents relating to internal audits in his office.
--``,```,,```,`,,,```,```,,````,-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---

Figure X1.3—Internal Audit Procedure

TS-AMRL R 18-20 AASHTO

Are records and

corrective actions
Item List specific record(s) reviewed. complete?
Technician training records

Technician competency evaluation records

Previous internal audit findings

Customer complaints

Records retention

Equipment inventory list

Equipment calibration, standardization, check,
and maintenance lists and records
Test records and reports

Proficiency sample reports

On-site assessment reports

Comments:
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________________

List specific QMS policies and procedures reviewed. Does the information accurately reflect current practices? Do they fulfill the requirements of
standards we use? Is the preparation or revision date for each document correct? Include any revisions and improvements needed.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________________

List employees interviewed during the audit:

_____________________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________________

List audit findings that require corrective action:

_____________________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________________

Audit conducted by: _____________________________________________________________________________________________

Date: ____________________________

Figure X1.4—Internal Audit Check Sheet and Report

--``,```,,```,`,,,```,```,,````,-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---

TS-AMRL R 18-21 AASHTO

The laboratory shall maintain a document describing management reviews. The laboratory’s top management shall review and discuss the
laboratory’s QMS policies, procedures and records at planned intervals not exceeding once per year. The purpose of the management
review is to ensure the continuing suitability and effectiveness of the QMS in satisfying the relevant requirements, including those
specified in this standard, and to introduce any necessary changes or improvements. At a minimum, the following information shall be
included in the management review:

a) Summary of follow-up actions from the previous management review

b) Suitability of QMS policies and procedures
c) Results of internal audits
d) Results of external assessments
e) Results of proficiency sample testing
f) Status of corrective actions
g) Changes in the volume and type of work
h) Resource needs

--``,```,,```,`,,,```,```,,````,-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
i) Complaints
j) Improvement recommendations

Results of management reviews, including the actions that arise from them, shall be recorded.

Note: Management review is a “big picture” examination of the laboratory’s QMS and performance over the past year. The focus should be on the
effectiveness of the QMS as well as continual improvement.

Figure X1.5—Management Review Procedure

TS-AMRL R 18-22 AASHTO

Attendees:

Summary of Follow-up Actions from Previous Management Review:

Internal Audit(s):
Summary of audit findings over past year:

External Assessment(s):
Summary of assessments and assessment findings over past year.

Proficiency Sample Testing:

Summary of results over past year.

Corrective Actions:
Have all corrective actions been closed?

--``,```,,```,`,,,```,```,,````,-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
If not, list status of open corrective actions.

Changes in the Volume and Type of Work:

Suitability of QMS Policies and Procedures/Revisions Needed:

Resource Needs (staffing, training, equipment, computer hardware and software, etc.):

Complaints:
Summary of complaints received over past year.

Improvement Recommendations:

Other:

Figure X1.6—Management Review Record

TS-AMRL R 18-23 AASHTO

Copyright American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials
Provided by IHS under license with AASHTO Licensee=Colorado Department of Transporation/5971061001, User=falls, dan
No reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS Not for Resale, 02/08/2017 07:12:24 MST
(Date)
MONITORING AND CORRECTIVE ACTION
GENERAL:
It is the responsibility of the Quality Manager to review all reports pertaining to proficiency sample testing, on-site assessment, and quality
management system evaluations and to bring poor results or differences to the attention of the appropriate Unit Supervisor. It is the
responsibility of the Unit Supervisor to ensure that corrective action is taken and documented. (In some cases it may be necessary for the
Quality Manager to take corrective action and prepare documentation relative to specific differences.)

Reports covering the results of proficiency sample testing and on-site assessment and quality management system evaluations, and
memorandums summarizing investigations and any corrective action taken, shall be maintained by the Quality Manager in the Quality
Manager’s office.

PROFICIENCY SAMPLE TESTING:

Participation:
AMRL Soil Proficiency Sample Program
AMRL Aggregate Proficiency Sample Program
CCRL Concrete Proficiency Sample Program

Identifying poor results:

Any result that is beyond 2 standard deviations from the average value.

Procedures to follow when poor results occur:

1. Determine if the Agency conducting the program correctly entered the data reported.
2. Determine if the test result obtained was properly transferred to the data sheet submitted.
3. Determine if all calculations leading to the test results obtained were correct.
4. Determine if the equipment used to perform the test meets specification requirements.
5. Determine if the procedures followed when performing the test conformed to specification requirements.
6. Take corrective action to repair or take steps to replace defective equipment or instruct the technician of the correct procedure to follow.
7. Prepare a memorandum of record summarizing the results of the investigation, identifying the cause of the poor results if determined,
and describing any corrective action taken.

ON-SITE ASSESSMENTS:
Participation:
AMRL Soils Inspection
AMRL Aggregate Inspection
CCRL Portland Cement Concrete Inspection

Procedures to follow when findings are reported:

(Apparatus Deficiencies)
1. Determine if the equipment meets specification requirements.
2. If the equipment is found to be defective, take necessary steps to repair or replace it.
3. Prepare a memorandum of record summarizing the results of the investigation and any corrective action taken.

(Procedural Deficiencies)
--``,```,,```,`,,,```,```,,````,-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---

1. Discuss each procedural deficiency with the testing technician and review the proper procedure.
2. Observe the technician perform the test properly.
3. Prepare a memorandum of record summarizing the action taken.

(Quality Management System Deficiencies)

1. The Quality Manager shall review each deficiency cited by the evaluator with the responsible employee.
2. Take appropriate action.
3. Prepare a memorandum of record summarizing the action taken.

Figure X1.7—Procedures Related to Monitoring and Corrective Action

TS-AMRL R 18-24 AASHTO

Upon receipt of a customer complaint, the following actions shall be taken:

1. The Director of the laboratory shall be notified.

2. Complaint is brought to the attention of the Supervisor of the department or section in question.
3. Supervisor contacts the customer to verify all aspects of the complaint and establish resolution date (if necessary).
4. All reports, records, and pertinent data shall be reviewed; and all calculations are to be checked for accuracy.
5. The technician(s) performing the test is consulted by the Supervisor to determine any unusual problems or circumstances involved.
6. Supervisor reports all information gathered to the Director.
7. The Director shall formulate an appropriate reply and issue same to the complainee.
8. A record of the complaint shall be maintained by the Director.

Figure X1.8—Procedure for Responding to Customer Complaints

(Date)

EQUIPMENT CALIBRATION, STANDARDIZATION, CHECK, AND MAINTENANCE INFORMATION

Item(s) Interval Requirement Procedure
Balances 12 Mo. Standardize ASTM D4753
Analytical Balances 12 Mo. Calibrate Outside Calibration Provider
Standard Masses 24 Mo. Calibrate Outside Calibration Provider
Mechanical Compactors 12 Mo. Standardize ASTM D2168
Mechanical Compactors 6 Mo. Clean In-House Procedure M-5
Lubricate
Check for wear
L.A. Abrasion Equipment 12 Mo. Check In-House Procedure A-2
Clean
L.A. Abrasion Machine 6 Mo. Lubricate In-House Procedure M-4
Proctor Hammer 12 Mo. Check In-House Procedure S-1
Compression Machines 12 Mo. Standardize Outside Calibration Provider
Compression Machines 3 Mo. Clean In-House Procedure M-1
Lubricate
Check for wear
Proctor Molds 4 Mo. Check In-House Procedure S-2
Marshall Molds 4 Mo. Check In-House Procedure B-2
Unit Weight Buckets 6 Mo. Standardize AASHTO T 19M/T 19
Testing Thermometers 6 Mo. Standardize ASTM E77
Reference Thermometers 12 Mo. Calibrate Outside Calibration Provider
Ensure spray nozzles
unclogged
Check for leaks
Check position of
Moist Room 3 Mo. temperature recorder probe In-House Procedure M-2
Temperature Controller 6 Mo. Standardize C511
Concrete Field Thermometers 6 Mo. Standardize C1064

Figure X1.9—Excerpt from List Showing Equipment Calibration, Standardization, Check, and Maintenance
Information

TS-AMRL R 18-25 --``,```,,```,`,,,```,```,,````,-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---

AASHTO
© 2016 by the American Association of State
Copyright American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials
Provided by IHS under license with AASHTO Highway and
Licensee=Colorado Transportation
Department Officials. User=falls, dan
of Transporation/5971061001,
No reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS All rights reserved. Duplication Not
is aforviolation of applicable
Resale, 02/08/2017 law.
07:12:24 MST
(Date)

EQUIPMENT CALIBRATION, STANDARDIZATION, CHECK, AND

MAINTENANCE POLICIES AND PROCEDURES

General Policies:

1. Required equipment shall be calibrated, standardized, checked, or maintained at specified intervals following the general
procedures indicated below.

2. Newly acquired equipment without a manufacturer’s certification and equipment that has not been calibrated, standardized, or
checked because it has been removed from service shall be calibrated or checked before being returned to service.

3. When any of the Unit’s test equipment is overloaded, mishandled, giving results that are suspect, or is not meeting specification
tolerances, the Supervisor shall remove it from service and clearly mark it by attaching a red ribbon or tape. The equipment
shall be returned to service only after appropriate repairs are made and calibration, standardization, or checks confirm the
equipment functions satisfactorily or meets specification tolerances.

General Procedures:

1. The Supervisor is responsible for ensuring that calibration, standardization, checks, and maintenance activities
are performed. He shall maintain a file for each piece of equipment in his unit requiring calibration, standardization, check, or
maintenance. The file for each piece of equipment shall contain detailed records of calibration, standardization, check, or
maintenance work performed in chronological order and shall be kept in the Supervisor’s office.

2. The Supervisor shall maintain calendar with deadlines for the calibration, standardization, check, or maintenance of all equipment
on his calendar. For in-house standardization, check, or maintenance activities, the calendar will have a 2-week alert and 1-week
alert to remind him of the due date for the activities. For external calibration activities, the calendar will have 5-week and 4-week
alerts so that there is adequate time to schedule the calibration with the external agency.

3. When the supervisor is prepared to complete the standardization, check, or maintenance activity, he will print the appropriate
blank record from the calibration folder on the network. At no time shall the Supervisor use the previous year’s record to perform
the activity.

4. The Supervisor or his designee will perform the necessary calibration, standardization, check, or maintenance work within the
next week.

5. If the Supervisor did not perform the calibration, standardization, check, or maintenance himself, the Supervisor shall review the
resulting record. If the record shows that the equipment is satisfactory, the Supervisor shall return the completed written records
--``,```,,```,`,,,```,```,,````,-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---

to the current year folders located in the calibration cabinet in the Supervisor’s office.

6. If the equipment is not satisfactory, the Supervisor will determine if repairs can be made or a replacement is required. Any
maintenance will be documented on the equipment record. If the equipment is taken out of service, the procedures for removing
equipment from service and acquiring new equipment shall be followed. When the activity is complete, including repairs and
confirmation of effective repairs through check or standardization, all work is to be documented clearly on the equipment record.
The written records are to be placed in the current year folders located in the calibration cabinet in the Supervisor’s office.

Figure X1.10—Policies and Procedures for Conducting Equipment Calibration, Standardization, Checks, and
Maintenance

TS-AMRL R 18-26 AASHTO

Equipment Checked: MECHANICAL SHAKERS

Purpose:
This method provides instructions for checking the sieving thoroughness and time required to sieve a sample.

Equipment Required:

1. Stopwatch readable to 0.1 s.

2. Balance, readable to 0.1 g.

3. Appropriate sieves, pans, lids.

Tolerance:
Equipment shall meet the sieving thoroughness specified in the applicable test method(s).

Procedure:
1. Obtain a well graded sample that covers the range of sieves to be used in the mechanical shaker.

2. Starting at the lower end of the estimated sieving time, run the mechanical shaker.

3. Using the stopwatch, determine the actual sieving time versus the time set on the machine.

1. Conduct a hand check on each sieve in the stack for sieving sufficiency as follows:
a. Hold the individual sieve, provided with a snug-fitting pan and cover, in a slightly inclined position in one hand.
b. Strike the side of the sieve sharply and, with an upward motion against the heel of the other hand at the rate of about 150 times per
minute, turn the sieve about one-sixth of a revolution at intervals of about 25 strokes.
c. In determining the sufficiency of sieving for sizes larger than the 4.75-mm (No. 4) sieve, limit the material on the sieve to a single
layer of particles. If the size of the mounted testing sieves makes the described motion impractical, use 203.2-mm (8-in.) diameter
sieves to verify the sufficiency of sieving.

4. Determine the sieving sufficiency according the applicable test method(s).

5. Repeat the sieving and sufficiency check procedure for at least two more sieving times.

6. The first sieving time the sufficiency check meets the tolerance should be noted as the standard sieving time for your mechanical shaker.

Considerations:

1. Certain test methods note that excessive sieve time (more than 10 minutes) to achieve adequate sieving can result in degradation of the
sample.

2. Different aggregate hardness or aggregate angularity may require different sieving times with a mechanical shaker to avoid sample
degradation. Additional checks may be required using the different types encountered by the laboratory. (required if complying with C1077)

3. Overloading individual sieves with too much material during the check will result in erroneous results.

Figure X1.11—Procedure for Checking Mechanical Shakers

TS-AMRL R 18-27 --``,```,,```,`,,,```,```,,````,-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---

Equipment Checked: SIEVES

Purpose:
This method provides instructions for checking the physical condition of laboratory test sieves ranging in size from 75 mm (3 in.) to 0.075
mm (No. 200) and for measuring the openings of coarse sieves having openings greater than or equal to 4.75 mm (No. 4).

Equipment Required:
1. A caliper readable to 0.01 mm (use for 4.75-mm sieve and coarser).
2. An eye comparator with a 0.1-mm scale or a magnifier (for use with sieves finer than 4.75 mm).

Tolerance:
Sieves shall meet the physical requirements specified in AASHTO M 92 (ASTM E11).

Procedure:
1. For sieves having openings equal to or greater than 4.75 mm, select and measure, using the calipers, the dimensions of at least four or
five sieve openings in each sieve to ensure that the openings in the wire cloth conform to the requirements in Table 1 of AASHTO M 92
(ASTM E11). Be sure to include, in the selection, any openings that appear distorted or unusual in size. Measure each of the openings
as the distance between parallel wires measured at the center of each opening. Measure each opening in both the x (horizontal) and y
(vertical) directions. Record the measurements for each of the selected openings. If a sieve has fewer than five full openings, measure
all full openings.
2. For sieves smaller than 4.75 mm, inspect the sieve cloth against a uniformly illuminated background. Use the eye comparator or
magnifier to examine any suspicious areas of the cloth. If obvious deviations, such as weaving defects, creases, wrinkles, or excessive
foreign matter in the cloth, are found, the wire cloth is unacceptable.
3. Inspect the general condition of the sieve. Check the frame and solder joints for cracks or holes. (Check for pinholes in the finer
sieves.)
4. Ensure that the sieve has an appropriate label.
5. Check for tightness of the wires on each individual sieve.

Figure X1.12—Procedure for Checking Sieves

(Date) Procedure: S-1

Equipment Checked: MANUAL HAMMER (AASHTO T 99, T 180) (ASTM D698, D1557)

Purpose:
This method provides instructions for checking the critical dimensions of the proctor hammers.

Equipment Required:
1. Calipers readable to 0.01 mm.
2. Tape measure readable to 1 mm.
3. Balance, capacity 5 kg, readable to 1 g.

Tolerance:
Equipment shall meet the dimensional tolerances specified in the applicable test method.

Procedure:
1. Measure and record the diameter of the rammer face determined by taking two readings 90° apart using the calipers.
2. Pull up the handle, measure, and record the drop height of the hammer. Determine this height inside the guide sleeve using the tape
measure.
3. Remove the hammer from the guide sleeve. Determine and record its mass to the nearest 1 g.
4. Measure and record the diameters of the vent holes near the end of the hammer.

Figure X1.13—Procedure for Checking Manual Compaction Hammers

TS-AMRL R 18-28
--``,```,,```,`,,,```,```,,````,-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`--- AASHTO
© 2016 by the American Association of State
Copyright American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials
Provided by IHS under license with AASHTO Highway and
Licensee=Colorado Transportation
Department Officials. User=falls, dan
of Transporation/5971061001,
No reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS All rights reserved. Duplication Not
is aforviolation of applicable
Resale, 02/08/2017 law.
07:12:24 MST
(Date) Procedure: A-1

Equipment Checked: CONICAL MOLD, TAMPER (AASHTO T 84) (ASTM C128)

Purpose:
This method provides instructions for checking the critical dimensions of the sand cone and tamper used in the above test method.

Equipment Required:
1. Calipers readable to 0.1 mm.
2. Balance, 500-g capacity, readable to 0.1 g.
3. Ruler readable to 1 mm.

Tolerance:
Equipment shall meet the dimensional tolerances specified in the test method.

Procedure:
(Cone)
1. Measure the inside diameter at the top of the cone to the nearest 1 mm by taking two readings 90° apart using the ruler and record the
results.
2. Invert the cone and repeat step 1.
3. Place the cone on a flat glass surface. Measure and record the depth of the cone.
4. Using the calipers, measure the thickness of the cone to the nearest 0.1 mm by taking two readings 90° apart at the top of the cone and
two readings 90° apart at the bottom of the cone and record the results.
(Tamper)
1. Measure and record the diameter of the tamping face to the nearest 1 mm by taking two readings 90° apart using the ruler.
2. Determine and record the mass of the tamper to the nearest 0.1 g.

Figure X1.14—Procedure for Checking Conical Molds and Tampers

--``,```,,```,`,,,```,```,,````,-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---

TS-AMRL R 18-29 AASHTO

Equipment Checked: L.A. ABRASION MACHINE (AASHTO T 96) (ASTM C131)

Purpose:
This method provides instructions for checking the critical dimensions and general operating condition of the L.A. abrasion machine and
the mass of the spheres used as test charges.

Equipment Required:
1. Steel rule readable to 1 mm.
2. Stopwatch readable to 0.1 s.
3. Balance with a 5-kg capacity, readable to 1 g.

Tolerance:
The L.A. machine shall meet the dimensional tolerances specified in the applicable test method listed above and shall be in good operating
condition. The steel spheres used to charge the L.A. machine shall meet the mass tolerances specified in the applicable test method listed
above.

Procedure:
(L.A. Machine)
1. Measure and record the inside diameter of the drum at the left and right edges to the nearest 1 mm.
2. Measure and record the width and height of the opening to the nearest 1 mm.
3. Measure and record the wall thickness at the left and right edge to the nearest 1 mm.
4. Determine if the cylinder is horizontal using a steel ball to check left-to-right roll.
5. Measure and record the shelf width inside the drum to the nearest 1 mm.
6. Measure and record the distance from the shelf to the opening in the direction of rotation.
7. Using the stopwatch, determine the r/min to the nearest whole number over a 5-minute period. Record the r/min.
8. Check that the number of revolutions is 500 by looking at the counter on the machine.

(Steel Spheres)
1. Determine and record the mass of each individual sphere to the nearest 1 g.
--``,```,,```,`,,,```,```,,````,-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---

2. Determine and record the mass of the collective charge(s) to the nearest 1 g.

Figure X1.15—Procedure for Checking L.A. Abrasion Machines

(Date) Procedure: B-3

Equipment Checked: TIMERS (AASHTO T 72, T 201, T 202) (ASTM D88, D2170, D2171)

Purpose:
This procedure provides instructions for checking the accuracy of timing devices.

Inspection Equipment Required:

1. Timer, readable to 0.1 s, having a verified accuracy within the tolerance listed in above test methods.

Tolerance:
Timers shall meet the accuracy requirements specified in the applicable test methods listed above.

Procedure:
1. Hold the calibrated timer in one hand and the timer to be checked in the opposite hand.
2. Start the timers simultaneously by pressing the “start” buttons at the same time.
3. Allow the timers to run for at least 15 min. Then stop the timers simultaneously. Record the time indicated by both timers.
4. Record the difference between the two timers. Calculate and record the percent accuracy.
( A − B)
% accuracy
= × 100
B
A = Reading on lab timer (s)
B = Reading on standard timer (s)

Figure X1.16—Procedure for Checking Timing Devices

TS-AMRL R 18-30 AASHTO

Equipment Checked: PENETRATION APPARATUS (AASHTO T 49) (ASTM D5)

Purpose:
This procedure provides instructions for checking the equipment used to perform the penetration test.

Equipment Required:
1. Balance, readable to 0.01 g.
2. Microscope or eyepiece, 10×.
3. Metal block, 10.0 mm high. Metal block, 25.4 mm (1 in.) high.
4. Support block, 75 to 87.5 mm high.
5. Ruler, readable to 1 mm.
6. Calibrated stopwatch, readable to 0.1 s.

Tolerance:
The equipment shall meet the tolerances specified in test methods AASHTO T 49 and ASTM D5.

Procedure:
1. Remove the spindle, 50- and 100-g weights from the penetrometer. Record the weight of each to the nearest 0.01 g.
2. Weigh each needle to the nearest 0.01 g. Visually examine each needle with a microscope or eyepiece. Each needle should be straight
and free of burrs. The base of each needle should be flat.
3. If an automatic timing mechanism is used on the penetrometer, start the calibrated stopwatch when the plunger is released and stop the
calibrated stopwatch when the plunger stops. Record the time indicated on the calibrated stopwatch to the nearest 0.1 s. If a manual
device is used to release the plunger, check the accuracy of the timing device used over a 60-s interval. Record the elapsed time to the
nearest 0.1 s.
4. Place the support block on the base of the penetrometer. Place the 10-mm block on the support block. Adjust the needle height so that
its tip just touches the top of the 10-mm block. Remove the 10-mm block and release the needle to the support block. Adjust the
instrument to measure the distance moved. Repeat step 4 using the 25.4-mm (1-in) block. Determine dial accuracy by comparing
readings with the height of the blocks.
5. Measure and record the distance from the perforated shelf to the bottom of the water bath. Measure and record the distance from the
perforated shelf to the surface of the water. Measure and record the distance the thermometer is immersed in the water.
6. Observe and record the temperature of the water in the bath to the nearest 0.1°C (0.2°F).
--``,```,,```,`,,,```,```,,````,-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---

Figure X1.17—Procedure for Checking Penetration Test Apparatus

TS-AMRL R 18-31 AASHTO

MECHANICAL SHAKER MAINTENANCE PROCEDURE

Equipment Needed: wrench, grease, brush

Procedure:
1. Clean all loose dust and particles from all exposed surfaces of machine.
2. Check each paddle for looseness—tighten where necessary.
3. Replace any paddles that are in poor condition.
4. Clean and grease rotating base.
5. Operate shaker without sieves in place to determine how shaker is working.
6. Explore any other possible issues and resolve them.

MECHANICAL SHAKER MAINTENANCE RECORD

Date Name Comments

1/5/08 Technician A Replaced 2 paddles
4/3/08 Technician A Done
7/7/08 Technician A Screws were loose on rotating base
10/2/08 Technician B Done
1/3/09 Technician B Installed sound dampener on door

Figure X1.18—Mechanical Shaker Maintenance Procedure and Record

______(Date)______
PROCESSING OF SAMPLES

IDENTIFICATION:
Each sample shall be accompanied by a sample tag indicating the sample number. This identifies the material in terms of the project, the location
of use within the project, the quantity of material represented by the sample, and the material’s intended use. The sample tag is kept with the
sample as long as it remains in the materials laboratory.

STORAGE:
After being logged in, samples are stored in the area of the laboratory in which testing is to be done. During storage, care is taken to avoid
disturbance or contamination. Any AASHTO requirements for storage (e.g., the moist storage of portland cement concrete cylinders) are
followed.

RETENTION:
Samples with acceptable test results are generally discarded when testing is completed. Those with failing results are retained until review of
those results is completed. At that time, the decision is made whether to discard, retest, or continue to retain the sample.

DISPOSAL:
Discarded nonhazardous materials are transported daily by materials section personnel to an appropriate area. Hazardous materials (e.g.,
bituminous concrete extraction solution) are stored in proper containers in an isolated area of the laboratory. Disposal by an approved disposal
contractor is arranged periodically by the hazardous waste disposal officer.

Figure X1.19—Procedure for Sample Management

TS-AMRL R 18-32 AASHTO

--``,```,,```,`,,,```,```,,````,-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---

PREPARING SAMPLE LOG:

Each sample brought to the materials laboratory for testing is recorded in a log book maintained by the Laboratory Manager. The following
information is recorded for each sample:

1. Sample number (this is assigned sequentially to each line of the log book).
2. Project name or contract number.
3. Description of the material.
4. Supplier of the material.
5. Location from which the sample was taken.
6. Name of person(s) who sampled the material.
7. Date of sampling.
8. Date the sample was received in the materials laboratory.
9. The word “RESAMPLE” in red ink (when applicable).
10. The date testing was completed.
11. The initials of the tester.

PREPARING AND CHECKING TEST REPORTS:

Test results are recorded on standard materials section worksheets, which are submitted to the Materials Lab Supervisor who reviews them
prior to preparing a test report. An original and two copies of the test report are prepared for review by the Laboratory Manager. The
original test report is filed in the project folder. One copy of the test report is kept on file with the worksheets in the materials laboratory,
and the other copy is sent to the project engineer for review. Test records and reports are maintained by the Office Manager.

AMENDING REPORTS:
When a report must be amended, a report form shall be filled out indicating the amended test results; the report status field “amended” on
the report form shall be checked; the comment section on the report form shall state the reason for the amended report; the amended report
shall be attached to the original report and processed in the normal manner; and the amended report shall be filed with the original report.

Figure X1.20—Procedures for Producing Test Records and Preparing, Checking, and Amending Test Reports

1
This document is under the jurisdiction of the American Association of State Highway and Transportation
Officials (AASHTO) Highway Subcommittee on Materials and is the direct responsibility of the Administrative
Task Group.
2
The definition is from the International Vocabulary of Metrology (abbreviated VIM), 3rd edition, 2008, published
by the International Organization for Standardization (ISO), in the name of the eight organizations that supported its
development and nominated the experts who prepared it: the Bureau International des Poids et Mesures (BIPM), the
--``,```,,```,`,,,```,```,,````,-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---

International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC), the International Federation of Clinical Chemistry (IFCC), the
International Laboratory Accreditation Cooperation (ILAC), ISO, the International Union of Pure and Applied
Chemistry (IUPAC), the International Union of Pure and Applied Physics (IUPAP), and the International
Organization of Legal Metrology (OIML). The VIM should be the first source consulted for the definitions of terms
not included in this practice.
3
The figures in this Appendix illustrate typical examples of documents, forms, and standard operating procedures
that address the requirements of this practice. A laboratory may employ other methods that satisfy the intent of this
practice. The figures are intended as examples of documents in a laboratory’s Quality Management System. They
are not intended to include all possible laboratory organizational structures or capabilities.

TS-AMRL R 18-33 AASHTO

Practical No. 3: Use Measuring Instruments: Ammeter, Voltmeter, and Wattmeter
100% (5)
Practical No. 3: Use Measuring Instruments: Ammeter, Voltmeter, and Wattmeter
4 pages
Astm A970 A970m 18
No ratings yet
Astm A970 A970m 18
6 pages
ASTM C142 - C142M - 17 (23) Clay Lumps and Friable Particles in Aggregates
No ratings yet
ASTM C142 - C142M - 17 (23) Clay Lumps and Friable Particles in Aggregates
2 pages
Astm C33 C33M 23
No ratings yet
Astm C33 C33M 23
2 pages
Astm C192 C192M 19
No ratings yet
Astm C192 C192M 19
4 pages
Cracks Chapter 6
100% (1)
Cracks Chapter 6
32 pages
Astm D 4914 08
No ratings yet
Astm D 4914 08
13 pages
Aashto T166-13
100% (1)
Aashto T166-13
6 pages
300mm HDP-CVD Ultima SSPS Manual
No ratings yet
300mm HDP-CVD Ultima SSPS Manual
180 pages
AASHTO R18 10 Establishing and Implementing A Quality Management
No ratings yet
AASHTO R18 10 Establishing and Implementing A Quality Management
28 pages
AASHTO R-18 QA For Testing Labs
100% (1)
AASHTO R-18 QA For Testing Labs
27 pages
ASTM C110 - Ensaios Físicos Da Cal Virgem
No ratings yet
ASTM C110 - Ensaios Físicos Da Cal Virgem
25 pages
ASTM C595 - C595M-23 Standard Specification For Blended Hydraulic Cements
No ratings yet
ASTM C595 - C595M-23 Standard Specification For Blended Hydraulic Cements
9 pages
Making, Accelerated Curing, and Testing Concrete Compression Test Specimens
No ratings yet
Making, Accelerated Curing, and Testing Concrete Compression Test Specimens
10 pages
Silica Fume Used in Cementitious Mixtures: Standard Specification For
No ratings yet
Silica Fume Used in Cementitious Mixtures: Standard Specification For
7 pages
Aashto T180 PDF
No ratings yet
Aashto T180 PDF
10 pages
Astm C 1758
No ratings yet
Astm C 1758
1 page
ASTM C1693 - Technical
No ratings yet
ASTM C1693 - Technical
41 pages
M 80-87 (2003) Coarse Aggregate For PCC
100% (1)
M 80-87 (2003) Coarse Aggregate For PCC
5 pages
Astm G51
No ratings yet
Astm G51
3 pages
Astm C1019-24
No ratings yet
Astm C1019-24
8 pages
211.1-22 Preview
No ratings yet
211.1-22 Preview
6 pages
Astm C827 / C827M: C109/C109M C125 C138/C138M C143/C143M C185 C191 C192/C192M C305 C403/C403M C670 C807 C939 C953 C1437
No ratings yet
Astm C827 / C827M: C109/C109M C125 C138/C138M C143/C143M C185 C191 C192/C192M C305 C403/C403M C670 C807 C939 C953 C1437
1 page
Astm A996-05
No ratings yet
Astm A996-05
5 pages
MB Value in Sand PDF
No ratings yet
MB Value in Sand PDF
6 pages
Astm C618 02
No ratings yet
Astm C618 02
1 page
Test-Summary Formation Factor
100% (1)
Test-Summary Formation Factor
15 pages
Establishing and Implementing A Quality Management System For Construction Materials Testing Laboratories
100% (1)
Establishing and Implementing A Quality Management System For Construction Materials Testing Laboratories
28 pages
Aashto PP 65
No ratings yet
Aashto PP 65
58 pages
Making and Curing Concrete Test Specimens in The Field: Standard Practice For
No ratings yet
Making and Curing Concrete Test Specimens in The Field: Standard Practice For
7 pages
Astm C617
No ratings yet
Astm C617
6 pages
ASTM A184 Welded Deformed Steel Bar Mats For Concrete Reinforcement
100% (1)
ASTM A184 Welded Deformed Steel Bar Mats For Concrete Reinforcement
2 pages
226 PDF
No ratings yet
226 PDF
8 pages
Steel Welded Wire Reinforcement, Plain, For Concrete
No ratings yet
Steel Welded Wire Reinforcement, Plain, For Concrete
6 pages
T 396 22 Evaluating Workability
No ratings yet
T 396 22 Evaluating Workability
8 pages
R76
No ratings yet
R76
8 pages
Aashto T260-97 (2001)
100% (1)
Aashto T260-97 (2001)
15 pages
Slump of Hydraulic-Cement Concrete: Standard Test Method For
No ratings yet
Slump of Hydraulic-Cement Concrete: Standard Test Method For
4 pages
C652 PDF
No ratings yet
C652 PDF
7 pages
Preparing and Testing Specimens From Shotcrete Test Panels: Standard Practice For
No ratings yet
Preparing and Testing Specimens From Shotcrete Test Panels: Standard Practice For
3 pages
Astm C128-22 - Astm C128-22
No ratings yet
Astm C128-22 - Astm C128-22
4 pages
Concrete Pipe, Manhole Section's, or Tile: Standard Method of Test For
No ratings yet
Concrete Pipe, Manhole Section's, or Tile: Standard Method of Test For
6 pages
Iso 16140-3
No ratings yet
Iso 16140-3
55 pages
Bulk Density ("Unit Weight") and Voids in Aggregate: Standard Test Method For
No ratings yet
Bulk Density ("Unit Weight") and Voids in Aggregate: Standard Test Method For
5 pages
Reinforced Concrete Arch Culvert, Storm Drain, and Sewer Pipe
No ratings yet
Reinforced Concrete Arch Culvert, Storm Drain, and Sewer Pipe
7 pages
C 183
No ratings yet
C 183
8 pages
Measurement of Rate of Absorption of Water by Hydraulic-Cement Concretes
No ratings yet
Measurement of Rate of Absorption of Water by Hydraulic-Cement Concretes
6 pages
CalCert. 26837
No ratings yet
CalCert. 26837
2 pages
ASTM C490-17 Standard Practice For Use of Apparatus For The Determination of Length Change of Hardened Cement Paste, Mortar, and Concrete
No ratings yet
ASTM C490-17 Standard Practice For Use of Apparatus For The Determination of Length Change of Hardened Cement Paste, Mortar, and Concrete
5 pages
Complete Bundle VHDL For Engineers 1st Edition Short
No ratings yet
Complete Bundle VHDL For Engineers 1st Edition Short
406 pages
M154
No ratings yet
M154
2 pages
Sem 8 All Report PDF
100% (1)
Sem 8 All Report PDF
62 pages
Arabic-English-Arabic Literary Translation Issues and Strategies (2023)
No ratings yet
Arabic-English-Arabic Literary Translation Issues and Strategies (2023)
192 pages
Ge1 - Understanding-The-Self
No ratings yet
Ge1 - Understanding-The-Self
18 pages
Community Paediatrics Oxford Specialist Handbooks in Paediatrics Official Test Bank
No ratings yet
Community Paediatrics Oxford Specialist Handbooks in Paediatrics Official Test Bank
405 pages
M 42M - M 42-95
No ratings yet
M 42M - M 42-95
5 pages
Silica Fume Used in Cementitious Mixtures: Standard Specification For
No ratings yet
Silica Fume Used in Cementitious Mixtures: Standard Specification For
7 pages
ASTM C1260 14 Reactividad en Barras
No ratings yet
ASTM C1260 14 Reactividad en Barras
5 pages
ASTM C33 11 Conc Aggregates
No ratings yet
ASTM C33 11 Conc Aggregates
11 pages
Air Content of Freshly Mixed Concrete by The Volumetric Method
No ratings yet
Air Content of Freshly Mixed Concrete by The Volumetric Method
9 pages
Astm C39 C39M 18
No ratings yet
Astm C39 C39M 18
4 pages
Astm C 128
No ratings yet
Astm C 128
4 pages
Method of Making and Curing Concrete Test Specimens in The Field Fop For Aashto T 23 Scope
No ratings yet
Method of Making and Curing Concrete Test Specimens in The Field Fop For Aashto T 23 Scope
6 pages
Astm G85-11
No ratings yet
Astm G85-11
14 pages
Astm C940 (Revisar)
No ratings yet
Astm C940 (Revisar)
3 pages
W4 How Public Policy Is Made
No ratings yet
W4 How Public Policy Is Made
14 pages
What Is Political Theory Philosophy - M Warren
No ratings yet
What Is Political Theory Philosophy - M Warren
8 pages
Astm D 2729
No ratings yet
Astm D 2729
6 pages
IB English Paper 1
No ratings yet
IB English Paper 1
21 pages
Midterm Hge Probs
No ratings yet
Midterm Hge Probs
2 pages
Astm C127-15
No ratings yet
Astm C127-15
6 pages
Astm C1077
No ratings yet
Astm C1077
6 pages
C490 Practice For Use of Apparatus For The Determination of
No ratings yet
C490 Practice For Use of Apparatus For The Determination of
5 pages
Daftar Pustaka: of Management Journal, Vol. 27, Pp. 95-112
No ratings yet
Daftar Pustaka: of Management Journal, Vol. 27, Pp. 95-112
10 pages
Donald Trump Horoscope
No ratings yet
Donald Trump Horoscope
47 pages
Shrink Disc Type HSD: Mounting and Removal Instructions For
No ratings yet
Shrink Disc Type HSD: Mounting and Removal Instructions For
1 page
Diby Diallo - Unit 5 Lesson 5
No ratings yet
Diby Diallo - Unit 5 Lesson 5
8 pages
Impact Sheet
No ratings yet
Impact Sheet
2 pages
Activities Guide and Evaluation Rubric - Unit 3 - Task 4 - Oral Production - Voices in Motion
No ratings yet
Activities Guide and Evaluation Rubric - Unit 3 - Task 4 - Oral Production - Voices in Motion
7 pages
10 1 1 472 9746 PDF
No ratings yet
10 1 1 472 9746 PDF
12 pages
Yr 11 WK 4 F. Math L. Plan 24-25
No ratings yet
Yr 11 WK 4 F. Math L. Plan 24-25
4 pages
8627 2 Assignment
No ratings yet
8627 2 Assignment
15 pages
Bloque - Grupo - Frase - Sintagma: Nucleo
No ratings yet
Bloque - Grupo - Frase - Sintagma: Nucleo
11 pages
Normal Approx To BD
No ratings yet
Normal Approx To BD
8 pages
Livpure Product Borchure
No ratings yet
Livpure Product Borchure
4 pages
2024 - 2025 MLS CLS Curriculum - Sheet
No ratings yet
2024 - 2025 MLS CLS Curriculum - Sheet
1 page
Optimised Psychology Base Study Guide by Eksiiy
No ratings yet
Optimised Psychology Base Study Guide by Eksiiy
6 pages
Chemistry-FUNGAT/ECAT: (Chapter 8+9 B-I)
No ratings yet
Chemistry-FUNGAT/ECAT: (Chapter 8+9 B-I)
2 pages
Slum Area Houses
No ratings yet
Slum Area Houses
2 pages
Extended Abstract Template
No ratings yet
Extended Abstract Template
2 pages