Aristophanes and the Greek Shadow Puppet theatre Karaghiozis
have been connected in a variety of interesting ways. Karaghiozis is a popular theatrical genre that was flourishing the first half of the 20th century in Greece. It has stock characters, traditionally made of leather or cardboard, who are animated behind an illuminated white screen. The shadow puppet theatre’s hero is Karaghiozis, a grotesque figure who is always hungry. The improvised plots typically evolve around Karaghiozis’ comic efforts to find something to eat. Humour is earthy, farcical and grotesque. The soul of the shadow puppet theatre is the animator who improvises the action, moves the puppets on the screen, sings and does the voices of all the characters. Scholars have noted similarities between Karaghiozis and the heroes of Aristophanes. Moreover, they have pointed out the existence of structural resemblances between the scenarios of the shadow puppet theatre and Attic comedy. 1 Other studies have focused on establishing links between the two genres, tracing the origin of both to ancient Greek festivities and rituals. 2 A hitherto almost unexplored field of research concerns the relationship of Karaghiozis to the performance of Attic comedy in modern Greece. Just like Karaghiozis, Attic comedy has been interpreted as popular theatre on the Greek stage since the early 1900s. Characteristically, translators would not hesitate to render the original into demotic Greek, the low variety of the language used in colloquial situations. 3 This is of course also the language of Karaghiozis. In the early part of the century performance of both genres was strongly associated with low class popular entertainment. 4 There is also evidence that the revue, another extremely popular theatrical genre at that time was a common source of inspiration in shaping both the translations of Aristophanes and the scenarios of Karaghiozis. 5 In the second part of the 20th century Greek artists have perhaps explored the connection between Karaghiozis and Aristophanes in a more direct way. For example, the Karaghiozis animator G. Michopoulos did an adaptation of Aristophanes’ Birds for the shadow puppet theatre in 1984. 6 The composer Dionysis Savvopoulos created a highly original performance piece based on The Acharnians, freely mixing immediately recognisable elements from Karaghiozis in his work. 7 Perhaps the initial inspiration for this project came from a production of The Acharnians presented by Karolos Koun in 1976, in which the director emphasised a close parallel between the Aristophanic hero 180 Karlos Koun, Karaghiozis and The Birds ______________________________________________________________ Dikaiopolis and Karaghiozis. 8 In all the instances I mentioned, Greek artists have approached Attic comedy as popular theatre. It is this association that invites the connection to the shadow puppet theatre. In an article published in 1963, the painter Yannis Tsarouchis explains that he has drawn a common lesson from Aristophanes and Karaghiozis:
The voice of the majestic Dedousaros (a major shadow
puppet player) in the night, the voice of Pan and the Satyrs, of Zeus and of Aristophanes, was haunting me all my life, [...] compelling me to scorn with the harshness of youth 9 everything “philological,” “civilized,” “artistic.”
Tsarouchis was a major collaborator in a landmark production of
Aristophanes’ Birds, directed by Karolos Koun in 1959. Koun (1908-1987), probably the most significant director of the 20th century in Greece, is also a key figure in the modern stage history of Attic comedy; he directed most of Aristophanes’ extant plays, fully articulating in his work a sophisticated popular aesthetic drawn from the Greek folk culture. Far from being picturesque, folk influence is well assimilated and refined in his work to produce a powerful modern interpretation of Attic comedy as ritual. At the same time Koun was sensitive to the political nature of Aristophanes’ plays and was successful in recasting their relevance in a contemporary context. Karaghiozis has been a major folk source of inspiration for Koun in developing his popular approach to Attic comedy. Influence from Karaghiozis is easy to detect in Koun’s later productions of Attic comedy, such as The Acharnians (1976) and Peace (1977), in which the Oriental aesthetic of the mise en scene directly evokes the shadow puppet theatre. In this article I focus on The Birds and argue that, even though more subtle and indirect, influence from Karaghiozis is already present in the earlier production and has inspired Koun to develop a highly original and imaginative interpretation of the play. His work deserves to be acknowledged, along with the French director Charles Dullin’s better known production of The Birds of 1928, as one of the two most significant productions of the play in the twentieth century. The Birds is one of Aristophanes’ wildest fantasy plays. At the opening of the comedy, two Athenians, Pisthetairos and Evelpides are searching for the land of the birds, as they hope to live there a life free of the decadence and demagogy of political life which suffocated them in their native city. The birds are initially hostile to the strangers but welcome them