Thesis Presentation

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 15

Welcome

To Our Thesis Presentation


25th Batch
Major: Geotechnical Engineering
Department of Civil Engineering
Uttara University
Thesis Presentation on
COMPARATIVE STUDY OF SOIL
STABILIZATION USING LIME & BUILDING
RENOVATION WASTE MATERIALS

Supervised By Prsented By
01. Nur Alam Ahmed 2203391003
Joy Majumdar
02. Md. Shahadat Hossain Shajib 2203391010
Lecturer
03. Razib Mia 2203391025
Department of Civil Engineering
04. Sumon Howlader 2203391029
Uttara University
05. Md. Rajmahol Hossain 2182391031
Table Of Contents
1 Background of the Study

2 Objective of the Study

3 Methodology

4 Analysis of the Result

5 Conclusion

6 Recommendations
Background of the Study
Soil stabilization increase Soil Engineering performance, Compressibility,
Permeability, and Elimination of weak soils.

Lime and Building Renovation Waste (Bricks, Plaster, Tiles etc.) are the
most well-known stabilizing agents that have been tested by several
researchers.
In this test, the soil was combined with different agents, such as Lime and
Building Renovation Waste, in different percentages 5%, 10%, and 15%
accordingly used as to improve the soil strength.
Objective of the Study

To find out the geotechnical properties for the soil samples


by different types of test (Grain moisture, Grain size
analysis test, Specific gravity test and Atterberg limit test).

To determine the unconfined compressive strength of the


soil samples mixed with different proportions of Lime and
Building Renovation Waste.
Methodology

Soil Collection
Soil is collected from a under
construction site at Sector 7, Uttara,
Dhaka.
Methodology

Soil Sample Preperation


at Laboratory
Methodology

Laboratory Test
1. Grain Size Analysis Test (By Sieve)
2. Moisture Content
3. Specific Gravity of Soil
4. Atterberg Limit Test of Soil
5. Unconfined Compressive Test
Results of Sieve Analysis of Soil
Table 01: Data Sheet for Sieve Analysis
Wt. of Soil Cummulative
Opening Percent Percent
Sieve No. Retained Percent
(mm) Retained Finer
(gm) Retained
#4 4.750 0.0 0 0 100.00
#8 2.360 42.0 4.20 4.20 95.80
#16 1.180 75.0 7.5 11.7 88.30
#30 0.600 242.0 24.20 35.90 64.10
#50 0.300 354.0 35.4 71.3 28.70
#100 0.150 219.0 21.90 93.20 6.80
#200 0.075 62.0 6.2 99.4 0.60
Pan - 6.0 - - -
Fig 01: Percent Finer vs Particle Size
Results of Specific Gravity of Soil
Table 02: Data Sheet for Specific Gravity

Weight of the pycnometer (gm) 250


Weight of the pycnometer + Dry soil (gm) 300
Weight of the dry soil,Ws (gm) 50
Weight of the pycnometer + water + soil, W1 (gm) 1271
Weight of the pycnometer + water,W2 (gm) 1240
Room temparature 29°C
Specific gravity of water, Gw ( at 20°C) 0.9982
Specific gravity of water, Gw (at 29°C) 0.9972
Specific gravity of soil Gs (at 20°C) 2.62
Results of Atterberg Limit Test of Soil

Table 03: Atterberg Limit Test of Soil

Liquid limit (%) 29

Plastic limit (%) 19

Plasticity index (%) 10

Fig 03: Flow Curve for Liquid Limit Determination


Results of Unconfined Compressive Strength
Table 04: Summarize value for Unconfined
Compressive strength value for different percentages
of lime and building renovation waste.

Building
Percentage
Lime (CaO) Renovation
of mixing
Waste Material

% qu (kPa) qu (kPa)

0 179

5 206 189

10 219 198

15 235 215

Fig 03: Unconfined Compressive strength value for different


percentages of lime and building renovation waste.
From atterberg limit test for natural soil we get liquid limit, plastic limit
and plasticity index that are 29%, 19% and 10% respectively. Which was
indicates that plasticity clayey soil is higher according to unified soil
classification system.
The compressive strength for the collected natural soil is 179 kPa obtained
from the unconfined compression test. On the other hand, the compressive
strength of Lime mixed with collected natural soil at 5%, 10% and 15%
were found to be 206 kPa, 219 kPa and 235 kPa. Similarly, the compressive

Conclusion strength of Building Renovation Waste mixed with collected natural soil at
5%, 10% and 15% were fund to be 189 Kpa, 198 Kpa, and 215 kpa
respectively.

Finally it was observed that specimens prepared with Lime and Building
Renovation Waste mixed at 5% and 10% with reclaimed soil gave higher
compressive strength than natural soil. A sample of natural soil mixed with
Lime gives relatively high and maximum compressive strength than
Building Renovation Waste.
Recommendations
Further exploration of long-term durability: Future research should focus on the long-term performance and
environmental impact of soil stabilized with lime and building renovation waste materials, assessing factors such
as resistance to weathering, shrinkage, and cracking over extended periods.

Optimization of material ratios: It is recommended to conduct additional studies on the optimal ratios of lime
and renovation waste materials to achieve the best soil stabilization results in different soil types, ensuring cost-
effectiveness and sustainability.

Integration with sustainable construction practices: As building renovation waste materials contribute to
reducing landfill waste, further exploration should be undertaken on how this method can be scaled for use in large
infrastructure projects, aligning with sustainable construction practices and reducing dependency on virgin
materials.
Thank you

You might also like