The Understanding by Design Guide To Advanced Concepts in Creating and Reviewing Units Sample Chapters 1st Edition Grant Wiggins
The Understanding by Design Guide To Advanced Concepts in Creating and Reviewing Units Sample Chapters 1st Edition Grant Wiggins
com
https://ebookfinal.com/download/the-understanding-by-design-
guide-to-advanced-concepts-in-creating-and-reviewing-units-
sample-chapters-1st-edition-grant-wiggins/
OR CLICK BUTTON
DOWNLOAD EBOOK
https://ebookfinal.com/download/the-understanding-by-design-guide-to-
creating-high-quality-units-1st-edition-grant-wiggins/
ebookfinal.com
https://ebookfinal.com/download/schooling-by-design-grant-p-wiggins/
ebookfinal.com
https://ebookfinal.com/download/understanding-by-design-2nd-edition-
gp-wiggins/
ebookfinal.com
https://ebookfinal.com/download/introducing-proteomics-from-concepts-
to-sample-separation-mass-spectrometry-and-data-analysis-lovric/
ebookfinal.com
Get Funded A Practical Guide to Understanding the Grant
Application Process and Writing Winning Proposals in the
Behavioral and Biomedical Fields 1st Edition Elias Phd
https://ebookfinal.com/download/get-funded-a-practical-guide-to-
understanding-the-grant-application-process-and-writing-winning-
proposals-in-the-behavioral-and-biomedical-fields-1st-edition-elias-
phd/
ebookfinal.com
https://ebookfinal.com/download/understanding-the-book-of-mormon-
grant-hardy/
ebookfinal.com
https://ebookfinal.com/download/inspired-philanthropy-your-step-by-
step-guide-to-creating-a-giving-plan-2nd-edition-tracy-gary/
ebookfinal.com
https://ebookfinal.com/download/understanding-american-government-
thirteenth-edition-no-separate-policy-chapters-version-susan-welch/
ebookfinal.com
Advance Uncorrected Copy --- Not for distribution
1703 N. Beauregard St. • Alexandria, VA 22311‑1714 USA
Phone: 800-933-2723 or 703-578-9600 • Fax: 703-575-5400
Website: www.ascd.org • E-mail: [email protected]
Author guidelines: www.ascd.org/write
Gene R. Carter, Executive Director; Ed Milliken, Chief Program Development Officer; Carole Hayward, Pub-
lisher; Julie Houtz, Director, Book Editing & Production; Darcie Russell, Senior Associate Editor; Georgia Park,
Senior Graphic Designer; Mike Kalyan, Production Manager; Sarah Plumb, Production Specialist, Valerie
Younkin, Desktop Publishing Specialist
© 2012 by Grant Wiggins and Jay McTighe. All rights reserved. It is illegal to reproduce copies of this
work in print or electronic format (including reproductions displayed on a secure intranet or stored in a
retrieval system or other electronic storage device from which copies can be made or displayed) without
the prior written permission of the publisher. By purchasing only authorized electronic or print editions
and not participating in or encouraging piracy of copyrighted materials, you support the rights of authors
and publishers. Readers who wish to duplicate this copyrighted material may do so for a small fee by
contacting the Copyright Clearance Center (CCC), 222 Rosewood Dr., Danvers, MA 01923, USA (phone:
978-750-8400; fax: 978-646-8600; Web: www.copyright.com). For requests to reprint or to inquire about
site licensing options, contact ASCD Permissions at www.ascd.org/permissions, or [email protected],
or 703-575-5749. For a list of vendors authorized to license ASCD e-books to institutions, see www.ascd.
org/epubs. Send translation inquiries to [email protected].
Understanding by Design® and UbD™ are trademarks of the Association for Supervision and Curric‑
ulum Development. ASCD EDge® is a trademark of the Association for Supervision and Curriculum
Development.
Printed in the United States of America. Cover art © 2012 by ASCD. ASCD publications present a variety
of viewpoints. The views expressed or implied in this book should not be interpreted as official positions
of the Association.
All web links in this book are correct as of the publication date below but may have become inactive or
otherwise modified since that time. If you notice a deactivated or changed link, please e-mail books@
ascd.org with the words “Link Update” in the subject line. In your message, please specify the web link,
the book title, and the page number on which the link appears.
PAPERBACK ISBN: 978-1-4166-1409-8 ASCD product #112026 n3/12
Also available as an e-book (see Books in Print for the ISBNs).
Quantity discounts for the paperback edition only: 10–49 copies, 10%; 50+ copies, 15%; for 1,000 or
more copies, call 800-933-2723, ext. 5634, or 703-575-5634. For desk copies: [email protected].
22 21 20 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
•••••
List of Figures..............................................................................................................vi
Introduction................................................................................................................ 1
The figures critical to exploring Understanding by Design are printed within and
page numbers are supplied. Additional figures that may be helpful are available
online and are noted with the OO (online only) designation. All figures may be
downloaded for your convenience.
Introduction
1 Outline of Modules.......................................................................................... 1
Module I
I.1 Unpacking Standards Stage 1—Mathematics................................................. 5
I.2 Unpacking Standards Stages 1–3—English Language Arts.......................... 13
I.3 Unpacking Standards Worksheet—Mathematics ........................................ 14
I.4 Unpacking Standards Matrix—Mathematics................................................ 15
I.5 Unpacking Standards Worksheet—Reading .............................................. OO
I.6 Unpacking Standards Worksheet—English Language Arts........................ OO
I.7 Unpacking Standards Matrix—Mathematics.............................................. OO
I.8 Unpacking Standards Matrix—History....................................................... OO
I.9 Unpacking Standards Worksheet—Civics................................................... OO
I.10 Unpacking Standards Worksheet—Social Studies ..................................... OO
I.11 Unpacking Standards Worksheet Stages 1–3.............................................. OO
I.12 Designing Units Based on Content Standards............................................ OO
I.13 Unpacking Standards Worksheet................................................................. OO
Module J
J.1 Evaluative Criteria and Related Evidence for Driver’s Education Unit.........21
J.2 Two Types of Criteria with Related Indicators.............................................. 24
J.3 Four Types of Criteria..................................................................................... 25
J.4 Four Types of Criteria with Sample Questions............................................. 27
J.5 Naive to Expert Understanding: A Continuum............................................ 28
J.6 Descriptive Terms for Differences in Degree................................................. 29
J.7 Holistic and Analytic Rubrics Compared—Examples for Graphing........... 30
J.8 Rubric for Assessing Autonomous Performance............................................31
J.9 Differentiation and Uniformity Within Assessments................................... 33
J.10 Four Types of Criteria with Descriptors/Indicators.................................... OO
J.11 Criterion-Based Performance List for Graphic Display of Data................. OO
J.12 Naive to Expert Understanding: A Continuum Worksheet........................ OO
J.13 An Analytic Scoring Rubric for Understanding........................................... OO
Module K
K.1 WHERETO Considerations for the Learning Plan........................................ 39
K.2 WHERETO Worksheet—Examples for the W (Where?)................................41
K.3 WHERETO Worksheet—Examples for the H (Hook and Hold Interest).... 43
K.4 Making Inferences Organizer—Adding Up the Facts (Pioneer Unit).......... 44
K.5 WHERETO Worksheet—Examples for E (Equip for Performance)............. 46
K.6 WHERETO—Examples for R (Rethink)........................................................ 47
K.7 Brainstorming Ways to Rethink and Revise Using the Six Facets................. 49
K.8 Rubric for Self-Assessment and Teacher Assessment—
Persuasive Essay...............................................................................................51
K.9 WHERETO—Examples for the Second E (Evaluate).................................... 52
Module L
L.1 Essential Questions Versus Knowledge Questions....................................... 55
L.2 Revising Essential Questions.......................................................................... 56
L.3 Overarching Versus Topical Questions.......................................................... 59
L.4 Understandings Versus Knowledge.................................................................61
L.5 Revising Understandings................................................................................ 63
L.6 Anticipating Misunderstandings.................................................................... 64
L.7 Overarching Versus Topical Understandings................................................ 65
L.8 From Skills to Understandings...................................................................... 66
Module M
M.1 Authentic Tasks Versus Simplified Exercises.................................................. 72
M.2 Performance Task Frames............................................................................... 76
M.3 Performance Task for Nutrition—GRASPS Example.................................... 79
M.4 GRASPS Task Scenario Builder....................................................................... 80
M.5 Possible Student Roles and Audiences...........................................................81
M.6 Possible Products and Performances............................................................. 82
M.7 Easier/More Difficult Situations.................................................................... 84
M.8 Brainstorming Realistic Situations................................................................. 85
M.9 Check: Is Every Desired Result Assessed?.................................................... OO
M.10 Matching Stage 1 Goals to Various Assessment Methods.......................... OO
M.11 GRASPS Performance Task Scenario for Social Studies.............................. OO
Module N
N.1 Backward Design and Differentiation............................................................91
N.2 Strategies for Differentiating Input................................................................ 94
N.3 Strategies for Differentiating Process and Product....................................... 95
N.4 Differentiating Using the Six Facets............................................................... 96
N.5 Using Information from Pre-assessment...................................................... 99
N.6 General Ideas for Differentiating Instruction and Assessment.................. OO
N.7 Ideas for Differentiating Instruction and Assessment for Reading............ OO
N.8 Ideas for Differentiating Instruction and Assessment for Writing............. OO
N.9 Ideas for Differentiating Instruction and Assessment
for Math and Science.................................................................................... OO
N.10 Ideas for Challenging High Achievers......................................................... OO
Module O
O.1 Beginning and Ending Lessons.................................................................... 109
O.2 Analyzing Sequence: Example and Worksheet............................................115
O.3 Lesson Plan Format...................................................................................... OO
O.4 Alternate Lesson Plan Format...................................................................... OO
O.5 Example of Lesson Plan Coding Using T-M-A:
Algebra Unit on Laws and Rules.................................................................. OO
O.6 Lesson Plan Coding Using WHERETO........................................................ OO
O.7 Using the Textbook Wisely........................................................................... OO
O.8 Sequence Options......................................................................................... OO
Module P
P.1 Unit Design and Feedback Loop..................................................................119
P.2 UbD Feedback Matrix................................................................................... 120
P.3 UbD Design Standards 2.0.......................................................................... 121
P.4 Observable Indicators in the Classroom (General).................................... 126
P.5 Final Self-Assessment Form......................................................................... 127
P.6 Observable Indicators in the Classroom (Learner Focused)...................... OO
P.7 Detailed Rubric for UbD Design Standards 2.0.......................................... OO
P.8 Final Self-Assessment Form Based on Feedback......................................... OO
P.9 Peer Review—Individual or Group Review Form....................................... OO
Fi gur e 1
Outline of Modules
Module N: Differentiating—
Module L: Sharpening Essential Module M: Authentic
Tailoring the Learning Plan
Questions and Understandings Assessment and Validity
to the Learners
Unpacking Standards
3
Advance Uncorrected Copy --- Not for distribution
4 The Understanding by Design Guide to Advanced Concepts in Creating and Reviewing Units
Many users of this Guide will need to address externally mandated goals of some
kind—most commonly state, provincial, or national standards. The UbD Template
has a specific box for such established goals, on the left side of Stage 1 (see Figure
I.1). This placement is meant to signal an important idea about state standards
and other such obligations. The standards are not the primary goals of your unit
design. Meeting them is necessary but not sufficient.
Consider an analogy with home building and renovation. The standards are
like the building code. Architects and builders must attend to them but they are not
the purpose of the design. The house to be built or renovated is to meet the needs
of the client in a functional and pleasing manner—while also meeting the build‑
ing code as a part of the larger integrated and coherent whole.
Similarly, although unit designs have to validly address external standards,
we always want to keep the long-term educational ends in mind: an engaging and
meaningful learning experience that develops learner understanding and curiosity
while also meeting standards. That’s why we place standards on the side of Stage 1.
In other words, standards by themselves are not a curriculum. A curriculum works
with the standards in a way to frame optimal learning experiences. The standards
are more like the ingredients list for a recipe than the final meal; they are more
like the rules of the game instead of strategy for succeeding at the game. A curricu‑
lum fleshes out the best ways to honor one’s obligations while making learning as
engaging and effective as possible.
Unpacking Standards
Standards can be somewhat opaque, and they often vary in clarity, complexity,
and specificity. Some standards are broad, cutting across many courses and grade
levels; others are narrow and content-specific. Some refer to content that must be
taught; other standards refer to performance levels that must be achieved.
A standard has to be treated like any other nonfiction text; that is, we have to
carefully analyze and interpret its meaning. A standard poses a challenge similar
to the one posed by determining the meaning of the Bill of Rights in specific situ‑
ations. In fact, a standard represents key principles that demand constant thought
and discussion. That’s what we mean by saying that educators need to “unpack”
standards for local use. The practical meaning of a standard is not self-evident even
if the writing is clear.
Consider this example:
Virginia History 5.7
The student will understand the causes and effects of the Civil War
with emphasis on slavery, states’ rights, leadership, settlement of the
west, secession, and military events. [Source: VA Curriculum Framework
United States History to 1865; Commonwealth of Virginia Board of
Education Richmond, Virginia Approved—July 17, 2008]
Common Core State Students will be able to independently use their learning to . . .
Standards in Math Solve nonroutine problems by persevering: simplify them, interpret expressions, and use equivalent forms based on the properties
of real numbers and the order of operations.
Interpret the structure of
expressions Meaning
1. Interpret expressions that
represent a quantity in terms of its UNDERSTANDINGS ESSENTIAL QUESTIONS
context. Students will understand that . . . Students will keep considering . . .
1. In mathematics, we accept certain truths as necessary to 1. What important rules and conventions are required to make
Write expressions in equivalent
permit us to solve problems with logical certainty (e.g., the algebra “work”?
forms to solve problems
properties of real numbers), whereas other rules are conven- 2. How can we simplify this expression?
3. Choose and produce an tions that we assume just for effective communication.
equivalent form of an expression 2. We can use the commutative, associative, and distributive
to reveal and explain properties properties to turn complex and unfamiliar expressions into
of the quantity represented by the simpler and familiar ones when problem solving.
expression.
Acquisition of Knowledge & Skill
Rewrite rational expressions
6. Rewrite simple rational expres- Students will know . . . Students will be skilled at . . .
sions in different forms. 1. The commutative property and to which operation it applies 1. Writing expressions in equivalent forms.
(and when it does not apply). 2. Revealing and explaining properties represented.
Mathematical Practices 2. The associative property and to which operation it applies 3. Rewriting rational expressions in different forms.
1. Make sense of problems and (and when it does not apply). 4. Identifying equivalence that results from properties and
persevere in solving them. 3. The distributive property and to which operation it applies equivalence that is the result of computation.
(and when it does not apply). 5. Justifying steps in a simplification or computation by citing
2. Reason abstractly and 4. The “order of operations” mathematicians use and why is it applicable laws, properties, conventions.
quantitatively. needed.
3. Construct viable arguments and 5. What PEMDAS mean.
Source: Goals from high school algebra standards, pp. 63–65. © Copyright 2011, National Governors Association Center for Best Practices and Council of Chief State School Officers.
Module I: Unpacking Standards
What does “understand” mean here? Does it mean make meaning of and transfer?
Or does it mean something narrower like analyze? Or is the demand far more
modest, namely “Accurately state and explain what others—credible experts—
have analyzed the causes and effects to be, as found in textbooks” (in other words
“understand” = “know”)? As you can see, how we teach and how we assess this
standard is greatly affected by the outcome of our inquiry. Such unpacking is essen‑
tial at the local level if the standards are to be validly and consistently addressed
across teachers, given the ambiguity of the key verb.
Even if we agree on what “understand” means here, there is a second ques‑
tion that must still be considered: What is an adequate understanding for a 5th
grader? In other words, how well must a student understand the causes and effects?
How sophisticated should that understanding be, to be a fair expectation of a 5th
grader? In other words, merely knowing the content to be addressed is not enough
information for local action. We need to analyze all relevant text to infer a reason‑
able performance standard for assessing student work, that is, to know when stu‑
dent work related to the standard is or isn’t meeting the standard.
Misconception Alert
Standards documents are written in a hierarchical list format. This analytic
framing of standards can easily mislead teachers into the following misconceptions:
• The standard clearly expects me to teach and test each objective in isolation.
• I’ll just focus on the top level (i.e., the broadest) standard. Then, I can jus‑
tify most of what I already do as meeting the standard.
• I’ll just focus on the lowest levels and check off these very specific objectives
that are covered in my normal unit. Then, I have addressed the standard.
Each claim is inaccurate and leads to needlessly isolated and ineffective teaching
and assessment.
Misconception Alert
Be careful if you work in a state that makes reference to “big ideas” and
“essential questions” in their standards. They do not always correspond to how we
define these terms in UbD. For example, Florida highlights certain standards by
labeling them big ideas, but this use of the phrase is meant to simply signal priori-
ties in general rather than specific transferable ideas to be grasped and used.
Similarly, some states have listed essential questions in their standards or resource
documents, but most of these would not meet the UbD design standard. For exam‑
ple, consider two listed “essential questions” in The Virginia History and Social Sci-
ence Standards of Learning Curriculum Framework 2008, a companion document to
the 2008 History and Social Science Standards of Learning:
Although these questions may point toward important knowledge, they are
certainly not essential in the UbD sense because they are factual questions, not
designed to cause in-depth inquiry and discussion. In sum, beware—especially
when familiar jargon is used in the documents.
Tip 3: Identify and analyze the key adjectives and adverbs to determine valid scor-
ing criteria and rubrics related to successful performance against the standards.
The qualifiers of the verbs and nouns can provide a useful and efficient way
to build a set of local rubrics to ensure that assessment is standards based and con‑
sistent across assignments. Here is an example, using a reading standard, in which
key qualifiers are in bold and implicit qualifiers are added in italics:
So the rubric titles might be Quality of Evidence Cited and Quality of Analysis
Made.
Tip 4. Identify and/or infer the long-term transfer goals by looking closely
at the highest-level standards and indicators for them, or inferring the transfer
goal from the content and justification for the standard. Even if the standard
stresses important content, it typically states or implies key performance related
to that content. In other words, if that’s the content, what are students eventually
expected to do with it? Long-term transfer goals answer the “Why are we learning
this?” question. Ask yourself
• What should students be able to do well on their own while using this con‑
tent, to truly meet this standard and its purpose? (complex performance ability)
• What does “perform well” mean for each standard? (specific performance
standards and criteria for evaluating complex performance)
In the event that the documents for your state, province, or nation do not identify
such long-term performance goals, we recommend that you look at the introduc‑
tory pages for each discipline. Larger goals, purposes, or intentions of the standards
are often presented in the opening section before the specifics are listed.
Tip 5: Consider the standards in terms of the long-term goal of autono
mous performance. To stress the transfer aspect of the goal, make a point of
highlighting the idea that students are expected to perform with content autono‑
mously. The most concrete and helpful way to do this is to make explicit and write
in a phrase that is unfortunately implicit in most standards: on their own. Students
must be able to use content autonomously, without the need for extensive scaf‑
folding, reminders, and hints. So, add “on their own” to each standard to better
grasp the kind of independent transfer expected.
Now, consider how the use of this phrase could influence assessment and
instruction. For example, it suggests the need for a “gradual release” of teacher
direction over time so that learners develop increasing capacity for independent
performance. The following examples, from the Common Core State Standards, in
which we added the key phrase, underscore this point:
ÂÂ
Design Tip: Here are some basic rules for interpreting established standards:
• Look closely at verbs, but be aware that not all standards documents use verbs con-
sistently to signal the type of goal or degree of cognitive demand. Check your state or
provincial documents for guidance.
• Some standards statements begin with a low-level verb (identify, describe, state).
Don’t be confused into thinking that this automatically signals a skill. Generally, such
statements call for knowledge. For example, “Identify parts of speech” specifies declara-
tive knowledge because it means that “the student will know the parts of speech,”
despite the action verb in the beginning. Look at the test specifications for the standards
for clarification.
• When higher-order verbs are used (analyze, infer, generalize), the goal can be ambigu-
ous. If the verb is followed by or describes general abilities, it is likely stating a transfer
goal. However, the verb may be used as a performance indicator and thus will be more
useful for determining specific assessment evidence in Stage 2. (See the following sec-
tion for further discussion.)
Online you will find worksheets set up in different ways and with varying examples to
help you unpack standards. Figure I.5, Unpacking Standards Worksheet—Reading; Figure I.6,
Unpacking Standards Worksheet—English Language Arts; Figure I.7, Unpacking Standards
Matrix—Mathematics; Figure I.8, Unpacking Standards Matrix—History; Figure I.9, Unpacking
Standards Worksheet—Civics; Figure I.10, Unpacking Standards Worksheet—Social Studies;
Figure I.11, Unpacking Standards Worksheet Stages 1–3; Figure I.12, Designing Units Based on
Content Standards; Figure I.13, Unpacking Standards Worksheet.
Fi gur e I. 2
What key FACTS must be known and used? Students need to know
such facts as . . .
• Definitions of “logical,” “inference,” “evidence,” “support.”
• The facts stated in the text.
Stage 2: Assessment
What are the key VERBS, and what do they suggest the specific
assessments need to be? Students will need to show they can . . .
• Determine what the text says explicitly.
• Make logical inferences (from the text).
• Support conclusions drawn from the text.
• Cite specific textual evidence.
What are the key ADJECTIVES and ADVERBS, and what do they
suggest the key criteria for judging work should be? Student perfor-
mance and products will need to reveal to what extent students . . .
• Read closely.
• Make logical inferences.
• Cite specific textual evidence.
Source: Standard excerpt from College and Career Readiness Anchor Standard in Common Core State Standards
for English Language Arts and Literacy in History/Social Studies, Science, and Technical Subjects, p. 35. © Copyright
2010. National Governors Association Center for Best Practices and Council of Chief State School Officers. All rights
reserved.
Fi gur e I. 3
Common Core Best Practice #4 Transfer goals in the VERBS: • Apply what they know to
everyday problems.
Model with mathematics. • Make assumptions and
Mathematically proficient students approximations.
can apply the mathematics they
know to solve problems arising • Analyze relationships
in everyday life, society, and the mathematically and draw
workplace. In early grades, this might conclusions.
be as simple as writing an addition • Interpret results in context.
equation to describe a situation. In • Simplify a complicated
middle grades, a student might apply situation.
proportional reasoning to plan a
• Reflect and improve model.
school event or analyze a problem in
the community. . . . • Be able to identify impor-
tant quantities in a practical
Mathematically proficient students situation.
who can apply what they know are
comfortable making assumptions and Criteria in the ADVERBS • Mathematically proficient
approximations to simplify a compli- and ADJECTIVES: • Context-sensitive
cated situation, realizing that these
may need revision later. They are • Comfortable
able to identify important quantities • Important quantities
in a practical situation and map their • Routinely interpret
relationships. . . .
Possible • Plan a school event.
They can analyze those relationships task ideas:
mathematically to draw conclusions. • Analyze a problem in the
They routinely interpret their math- community.
ematical results in the context of the
situation and reflect on whether the Stated or implied big ideas • Simplification of a compli-
results make sense, possibly improv- in the NOUNS: cated situation
ing the model if it has not served its • Proportional reasoning
purpose.
• Problems
Source: Standard excerpt from Common Core State Standards, Standards for Mathematical Practice, p. 7. © Copy-
right 2011, National Governors Association Center for Best Practices and Council of Chief State School Officers. All
rights reserved.
Insert (within 1 or more cells) important learning activities and performance tasks that require strategic thought and real-world competence in the use of content. Refer back
to the transfer and meaning goals to determine the kinds of complex work and thinking expected of students.
Source: Excerpt from mathematical practices and grade 3 overview standards, p. 22. © Copyright 2010, National Governors Association Center for Best Practices and Council of Chief
15
(as reflected in valid assessments) and if students have truly met the standards
locally (as reflected in valid and reliable scoring), then we should be confident
about their ability to perform on tests designed backward from the same standards.
Alas, the inability to make such an accurate prediction is arguably one of the
greatest weaknesses in U.S. education: local tests and grades rarely predict state and
national performance, with dire consequences for students, teachers, and admin‑
istrators. By contrast, think of sports where we can see in weekly results (based on
time) how our team stacks up against local, regional, state, and national competi‑
tion. A coach at a small school does not deceive herself about student performance.
The official times tell a different tale: not one of her runners is likely to place in
the top 50 in the end-of-season regional or sectional meet. The sooner the runners
know this, the better. And the same is true for academic achievement.
That is why more and more schools have signed on to provide Advanced
Placement or International Baccalaureate classes. Our point is not to promote
these or any other programs, but such adoption is sensible if we want to be sure
that local assessment is valid and compares reasonably with assessments used in
other schools. The ideal solution, we think, is to strive for valid and rigorous local
assessment, with regular audits of such validity and rigor, so that students, parents,
and other stakeholders can have confidence in local assessment.
Our students and their coaches, or teachers, need to know where they really
stand week in and week out against established performance benchmarks. Local
assessments must aspire to give us information about that standing, whether or
not we adopt external programs. No surprises, no excuses. We should know where
we stand against standards before it is too late to do anything about it.
Congratulations on completing this Guide! No doubt you’ll agree that UbD unit
design is challenging work. Nonetheless, we trust that the tools, tips, exercises, and
examples have been helpful. In this concluding section, we offer tips for moving
forward with UbD and cautionary notes to help you avoid unintentionally under‑
mining your efforts.
132
Advance Uncorrected Copy --- Not for distribution
Module P: Conclusion 133
References
Wiggins, G., & McTighe, J. (2007). Schooling by design. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
135
At the time of publication, the following ASCD resources were available (ASCD
stock numbers appear in parentheses). For up-to-date information about ASCD
resources, go to www.ascd.org.
Print Products
Integrating Differentiated Instruction and Understanding by Design: Connecting Content
and Kids Carol Ann Tomlinson and Jay McTighe (#105004)
Making the Most of Understanding by Design John L. Brown (#103110)
Schooling by Design: An ASCD Action Tool (#707039)
Schooling by Design: Mission, Action, and Achievement Grant Wiggins and Jay McTighe
(#107018)
Understanding by Design Expanded 2nd edition Grant Wiggins and Jay McTighe
(#103055)
The Understanding by Design Guide to Creating High-Quality Units Grant Wiggins and
Jay McTighe (#109107)
The Understanding by Design Professional Development Workbook Jay McTighe and
Grant Wiggins (#103056)
DVDs
Connecting Differentiated Instruction, Understanding by Design, and What Works in
Schools: An Exploration of Research-Based Strategies with Carol Ann Tomlinson, Jay
McTighe, Grant Wiggins, and Robert J. Marzano (#609012)