Appendix-II For SAS - Rev04 - STANDARD FACTORY SIMULATION TEST PLAN
Appendix-II For SAS - Rev04 - STANDARD FACTORY SIMULATION TEST PLAN
LOA No :
PROJECT NAME :
Prepared by :
Reviewed by :
Recommended by :
Approved by:
Page |1
Contents
General: 3
1 Test Configuration.................................................................................................................. 3
1.1 Equipment .............................................................................................................................. 3
1.2 Engineering documents.......................................................................................................... 4
1.3 Station level equipment: ........................................................................................................ 6
1.3.1 Hardware Component ........................................................................................................... 6
1.3.2 Software Components: .......................................................................................................... 7
1.3.2.1 Firmware Verification ............................................................................................................ 7
1.3 Test Equipment ...................................................................................................................... 9
1.4.1 Test Equipment Inspection .................................................................................................... 9
1.5 Power Checks ......................................................................................................................... 9
2. Functional testing ................................................................................................................. 10
2.1 Start-up and SAS system availability .................................................................................... 10
2.2 Monitoring and control ........................................................................................................ 11
2.2.1 BCU – displays and handling ................................................................................................ 11
2.2.2 HMI – modes of operation and user management .............................................................. 12
2.2.3 HMI – Displays and Handling ............................................................................................... 13
2.2.4 Inspections of HMI typical bay screens ................................................................................ 15
2.2.5 SCADA connection ............................................................................................................... 17
2.2.6 Control tests ......................................................................................................................... 18
2.2.7 Control method .................................................................................................................... 19
2.2.8 Control of dummy circuit breaker ........................................................................................ 19
2.2.9 Control of circuit breaker ..................................................................................................... 19
2.2.10 Synch-check ......................................................................................................................... 20
2.2.11 Control of isolator and earthing switch ............................................................................... 22
2.2.12 Interlocking (bay and station based).................................................................................... 23
2.2.13 Switching sequences for GIS ................................................................................................ 23
2.2.14 Digital RTCC Functions (if applicable)) ................................................................................. 23
2.2.15 Event processing .................................................................................................................. 24
2.2.16 Alarm processing.................................................................................................................. 25
2.2.17 Analogue measurement handling ........................................................................................ 26
2.2.18 Changing of alarm limits ...................................................................................................... 28
2.2.19 Redundancy/Availability and diagnostic function................................................................ 29
2.2.20 Additional Tests ................................................................................................................... 34
2.2.21 Remote Desktop .................................................................................................................. 35
2.2.22 Time synchronization ........................................................................................................... 35
2.3.1 Validation of OWS Memory and Disk Utilization ................................................................. 36
2.3 EWS TEST.............................................................................................................................. 36
2.4.1 Setting and Configuring of BCUs .......................................................................................... 36
2.5 Auto Reclose Test ................................................................................................................. 37
2.5.1 Test for Auto-Reclose Successful case:- ............................................................................... 37
2.5.2 Test for Auto-Reclose Failure case:- .................................................................................... 37
2.6 Setting of Protection Relays ................................................................................................. 37
2.6.1 Setting of Main-1 Protection Relays .................................................................................... 37
2.6.2 Setting of Main-2 Protection Relays ............................................................................ 38
2.7 DR Configuration : Check DR is configured as per TS as per following ............................ 38
2.8 Disturbance File Retrieval ........................................................................................... 38
3.2 BCU Input/output Data Retrieval ................................................................................ 39
3.3 Substation Controller Device Reporting ....................................................................... 40
3.3.1 IEC 60870-5-101 Data Retrieval................................................................................... 41
3.3.2 Master Digital Inputs Retrieval .................................................................................... 41
3.4 Master Analog Inputs Retrieval ................................................................................... 41
3.5 Statement of System Acceptance ................................................................................ 41
3.6 Duration of Factory Acceptance Test .......................................................................... 41
Page |2
Doc. No. : PG/CC/AM/STD/SAS/FAT Rev0
General:
This document is used as a standard test protocol of all tests to be done at the Factory Acceptance
Test (FAT) for the typical Substation Automation System (SAS) and Control &Protection system of
every substation.
Aim of the Factory Acceptance Test (FAT) is to demonstrate equipment and functionality as well as
the approval of the system-parameterization by POWERGRID to reduce the change requests during
commissioning at site. The general philosophy shall be to deliver a system to site only after it has been
thoroughly tested and its specified performance has been verified, as far as site conditions can be
simulated in a test lab. During FAT the entire Sub-station Automation System including complete
control and protection system to be supplied shall be tested for complete functionality and
configuration in factory itself. The extensive testing shall be carried out during FAT. The purpose of
Factory Acceptance Testing is to ensure trouble free installation at site. No major configuration setting
of system is envisaged at site.
This document details the equipment and functions under test and the corresponding test methods as
well as the test documentation.
1 Test Configuration
1.1 Equipment
For the FAT configuration the following equipment will be present:
Computer type: Quantity (complete SW installed)
(Make e.g. Advantech) Engg./DR PC Server PC Client/HMI PC Gateway PC
(Model)
Ethernet Switch
GPS Time server
Router cum Firewall
Networking Panel
Auxiliary BCU Panel
Protection & Relay Panels NA NA
Peripheral Quantity
Make/Model Nos.
Event Printer
DR Printer (Color)
Logbook Printer
Auto-Changeover switch for
redundant UPS supply
UPS (5 kVA)
Verify by:
POWERGRID Representative Manufacturer Representative
Signature : Signature :
Name : Name :
Date : Date :
Page3
Factory Simulation Test (FST) /Factory Acceptance Test (FAT) Procedure Rev0.doc
Doc. No. : PG/CC/AM/STD/SAS/FAT Rev0
Note: These equipment quantities shall be verified w.r.t. Engg. approved SAS Architecture and
BOM.
19.
Notes:1) Typical units will be present which can be loaded with different configurations
For an overview drawing of the equipment installed for the FAT please refer to the Appendix.
Verify by:
POWERGRID Representative Manufacturer Representative
Signature : Signature :
Name : Name :
Date : Date :
Page4
Factory Simulation Test (FST) /Factory Acceptance Test (FAT) Procedure Rev0.doc
Doc. No. : PG/CC/AM/STD/SAS/FAT Rev0
5. Guaranteed Technical Particulars (GTPs) as approved by POWERGRID are included in Appendix A for
reference.
6. Copy of Customer Technical Specification for reference is made available in the FAT room.
Verify by:
POWERGRID Representative Manufacturer Representative
Signature : Signature :
Name : Name :
Date : Date :
Page6
Factory Simulation Test (FST) /Factory Acceptance Test (FAT) Procedure Rev0.doc
Doc. No. : PG/CC/AM/STD/SAS/FAT Rev0
6 Gateway #2 □
7 Disturbance Recorder PC □
8 Color Laser JET Printer NA □
9 Dot Matrix printer NA □
10 GPS Receiver Unit NA □
Panel Visual Inspections Log:
S.NO. Equipment Serial No. Circuit Name Quality of Wiring Checked
1 HMI-1 □
2 HMI-2 □
3 DR PC □
4 Color Laser JET Printer □
5 Dot Matrix Printer □
6 Gateway-1&2 □
7 Ethernet Switches □
Verify by:
POWERGRID Representative Manufacturer Representative
Signature : Signature :
Name : Name :
Date : Date :
Page7
Factory Simulation Test (FST) /Factory Acceptance Test (FAT) Procedure Rev0.doc
Doc. No. : PG/CC/AM/STD/SAS/FAT Rev0
SERVER 1 172 16 55 1 □
SERVER 2 □
OWS1 □
OWS2 □
EWS/DR PC □
SDC1 □
SDC2 □
GATEWAY1 □
GATEWAY2 □
GPS Time Server 1 □
GPS Time Server 2 □
Ethernet Switch 1 □
Ethernet Switch 2 □
Event Printer □
Color Laserjet Printer □
Router cum Firewall 1 □
Router cum Firewall 2 □
19 Port Managed LAN □
Switch
Verify by:
POWERGRID Representative Manufacturer Representative
Signature : Signature :
Name : Name :
Date : Date :
Page8
Factory Simulation Test (FST) /Factory Acceptance Test (FAT) Procedure Rev0.doc
Doc. No. : PG/CC/AM/STD/SAS/FAT Rev0
172 16 55 101 □
P444 _____ LINE #01_21M1
□
Setup/Program
Perform the steps below to confirm correct operation of all equipment connected to the power
supplies.
Procedure
1. Verify that all 220V AC/DC equipments are powered at the nominal AC/DC supply voltage input.
Using a Digital Multimeter verify that the nominal AC/DC supply voltage is present.
2. Verify that there are no abnormalities seen when the equipment are turned ON.
1 NA Server-1 □
2 NA Server-2 □
3 NA HMI-1 □
4 NA HMI-2 □
5 NA DR PC □
6 Gateway-1 □
7 Gateway-2 □
8 NA Laser JET Printer □
9 NA Dot Matrix Printer □
10 Networking Panel Auxiliaries (Lighting etc), LAN □
Switches, Gateway
2. Functional testing
General Substation Automation System (SAS) is a combination of different bay control units and
protection devices with a central operator placed as Human-Machine-Interface (HMI) and central data
storage and acquisition. These components and its connections are shown in the System Architecture.
For SAS-FAT a configuration is selected to check the basic system functions and the co-operation
between the different components. The test procedure will show the proper function of the system in
general. All of decentralized I/O devices (bay control units and protection devices) is provided for this
test. A complete test of all I/O signals (see SAS signal list) is objective of this test. All modules are
tested by type tests in general and by test routines during manufacturing.
the user has to register with his password. The timing of the Engineering PC and Protection Interface
PC starts with switching on the power supply and finishes after successful achievement of the working
condition.
After start-up of all devices the error free operation, communication and time synchronization of
components is checked on the SCADA displays.
S.NO. System Start-up Checked
Verify by:
POWERGRID Representative Manufacturer Representative
Signature : Signature :
Name : Name :
Date : Date :
P a g e 11
Factory Simulation Test (FST) /Factory Acceptance Test (FAT) Procedure Rev0.doc
Doc. No. : PG/CC/AM/STD/SAS/FAT Rev0
Purpose
To verify that the OWS/HMI system has Security Classes, that are enabled and configured properly.
Setup
1. Ensure that the HMI Servers are running.
Procedure
Verify by:
POWERGRID Representative Manufacturer Representative
Signature : Signature :
Name : Name :
Date : Date :
P a g e 12
Factory Simulation Test (FST) /Factory Acceptance Test (FAT) Procedure Rev0.doc
Doc. No. : PG/CC/AM/STD/SAS/FAT Rev0
Procedure
1. Verify the layout of each SLD on the OWS.
2. Verify the device number, device description and device symbol for each device.
3. Verify all displayed analog and digital values on the detailed bay view screens.
4. Click on each device object and confirm that the respective popup screen or bay/view detail screen
is displayed.
5. Repeat steps 1 to 4 for each SLD / Detailed Bay View.
(In case of extension packages, the existing make SCADA system of the substation where extension
is proposed shall be used to carry out the validation of extension bays signals, control commands,
etc., with the extension bays configured as the only bays that exist in the substation. For this
purpose, the existing SCADA system can be installed in a laptop. Further after completion of FAT, the
verified SCADA configuration shall be used for addition into the existing SCADA at site.)
Verify by:
POWERGRID Representative Manufacturer Representative
Signature : Signature :
Name : Name :
Date : Date :
P a g e 15
Factory Simulation Test (FST) /Factory Acceptance Test (FAT) Procedure Rev0.doc
Doc. No. : PG/CC/AM/STD/SAS/FAT Rev0
Purpose
To verify that the signals as per the specimen signal list provided by POWERGRID has been
correctly configured and are appearing on SCADA HMI as desired.
Setup
The Detailed signal list based on which the SCADA configuration has been prepared shall be taken and
each signal shall first be validated (e.g appearance of “Valid”, Reset/ Set/operated/Healthy, etc status
as per the appearance of on screen validity shall be checked). Any signal appearing as “unknown” /
“invalid” shall be flagged and configuration shall be modified for proper validation.
After validation of signals under SCADA configuration, various protection functions and appearance of
the desired signals on SCADA HMI shall be verified.
For certain signals (having Integer type attribute), the on-screen display of text displayed depends on
the value fetched from IED, (e.g. Auto-reclose status from function RREC wherein the value of
AutoRecSt 1 denotes ready, 2 denotes Auto-reclosure in-progress, etc). All types of text displays with
different inputs shall be verified by simulation of the state.
For all the IEDs subscribing to GOOSE messages from other IEDs ( e.g. BCUs), which are used to
perform logical actions, the appearance of GOOSE fail / GOOSE trouble alarm shall be configured and
verified by making one of the GOOSE message absent, to which the IED subscribes.
The Voltage selection logics for ICTs & Rector feeders, utilizing GOOSE messages shall also be verified
by simulating various switchgear status, which change the selected voltage.
Verify by:
POWERGRID Representative Manufacturer Representative
Signature : Signature :
Name : Name :
Date : Date :
P a g e 16
Factory Simulation Test (FST) /Factory Acceptance Test (FAT) Procedure Rev0.doc
Doc. No. : PG/CC/AM/STD/SAS/FAT Rev0
4 Verify that the Time Scale for trend curves are user settable. □
5 Verify that EHV Lines have Predefined trend of active and reactive □
power, ICT have Predefined trend of current, active and reactive
power. Bus have Predefined trend of voltage and frequency.
- spontaneous information □
- general interrogation
- time stamping of indications □
2.2.6 Control tests
Control is possible from Relay Panel/MIMIC Board, BCU, Operator Workstation (1 or 2) and
NTAMC/Backup NTAMC/RTAMC. During the test all check back indications from switchgear devices
will be simulated by an I/O simulation box. Preconditions for controls are correct switching conditions
(synch-check and interlocking). Switching the relevant local/remote switch will be displayed in event
list.
HMI/SCADA Display □ □ □ □
event list
□ □ □ □
400kV Circuit breaker
Control/Display BCU
Control/Display HMI □ □ □ □
Control/Display □ □ □ □
SCADA
HMI/SCADA Display □ □ □ □
event list □ □ □ □
2.2.10 Synch-check
Synchro check-function is parameterized in the BCU. Therefore control is demonstrated from bay
control unit for functionality-check. Positions of bus bar voltage transformer disconnecting switch are
simulated by an I/O simulation box and bus bar voltage by a test set (e.g., Relay Test Kit).
Purpose
To verify that Incoming and Running (Reference) voltages are within the synchronizing range before
the circuit breaker can close. The circuit breaker will not close if any of the limiting parameters is not
within the check synchronizing range. For practical reasons this FAT will not include the testing of
Running Voltage selection for the Synchronization.
Setup
1. Set up the BCU to check synchronizing ranges as follows:
• Phase Differences Specification requirement states Phase Difference shall not exceed 30° (1º
Hysterisis).
• Voltage Difference Specification requirement states Voltage Difference shall not exceed 10%
(2% Hysterisis).
• Frequency difference 0.1 Hz (Connected System).
2. Set up the 3 Phase Injection Kit to supply the Running Voltage & Selected Voltage to BCU TMU card
(CT/VT card).
3. Set up the 3 Phase Injection Kit to the following test cases:
1 0.20 40.0 No □
2 0.12 40.0 No □
3 0.10 20.0 No □
4 0.09 20.0 No □
5 0.09 17.0 No □
6 0.10 16.0 No □
7 0.10 15.0 Yes □
Verify by:
POWERGRID Representative Manufacturer Representative
Signature : Signature :
Name : Name :
Date : Date :
P a g e 20
Factory Simulation Test (FST) /Factory Acceptance Test (FAT) Procedure Rev0.doc
Doc. No. : PG/CC/AM/STD/SAS/FAT Rev0
CB CB Condition Checked
765KV Circuit Breakers
□
□
□
400KV Circuit Breakers
□
□
□
The above check sync verification is to be carried out for all possible voltage selection logics for
synchronization (e.g, for main bay breaker connected to Bus 1 in one and half scheme, Bus 1 Voltage-
Bus 2 Voltage, Bus 1 Voltage - Feeder 1 Voltage, Bus 1 Voltage – Feeder 2 voltage, as may be required
in the scheme). These possible voltage selection conditions are required to be simulated either by
simulated switchgear or by simulating GOOSE messages published by other BCUs, which are required
in the selection logic.
Purpose
To verify that when the following conditions are met, the Synchrocheck logic permits the Immediate
closure of the Circuit Breaker.
• Dead Line-Dead Bus
• Dead Line-Live Bus
• Live Line-Dead Bus
Setup
1. Set up the BCU to check synchronizing settings as follows:
• Presence of Line Voltage (Param1) – 70%
• Absence of Line Voltage (Param2)– 20%
• Presence of Bus Voltage (Param3)– 70%
• Absence of Bus Voltage (Param4)– 20%
Procedure
The absolute values of the two voltages (Vline and Vbusbar) must be above or below settable
thresholds, to permit the circuit breaker closing. The following voltage controls are available:
• not (Vline) and not(Vbusbar) – (Dead Line-Dead Bus)
Verify by:
POWERGRID Representative Manufacturer Representative
Signature : Signature :
Name : Name :
Date : Date :
P a g e 21
Factory Simulation Test (FST) /Factory Acceptance Test (FAT) Procedure Rev0.doc
Doc. No. : PG/CC/AM/STD/SAS/FAT Rev0
Verify by:
POWERGRID Representative Manufacturer Representative
Signature : Signature :
Name : Name :
Date : Date :
P a g e 22
Factory Simulation Test (FST) /Factory Acceptance Test (FAT) Procedure Rev0.doc
Doc. No. : PG/CC/AM/STD/SAS/FAT Rev0
list will also be tested. One bay for each voltage level will be checked (400kV-station: “C03” and for
132kV-station: “E05”). Furthermore some faults will be simulated (e.g. control authority, CMD
interlocked, CMD monitoring time).
SCADA-interface is simulated with test program IEC-Test.
Verify by:
POWERGRID Representative Manufacturer Representative
Signature : Signature :
Name : Name :
Date : Date :
P a g e 23
Factory Simulation Test (FST) /Factory Acceptance Test (FAT) Procedure Rev0.doc
Doc. No. : PG/CC/AM/STD/SAS/FAT Rev0
transformer feeder can be changed with the top/down slider by using the manual mode. The exit
button closes the window.
1. Select a Digital Input Point from one of the BCUs configured as an Event.
2. Change the state of the Selected Input
3. Verify that an Event is displayed in the Event Screen with proper description and Time Stamp.
4. Acknowledge this alarm.
5. Go to Event Screen and verify that this alarm is displayed in the list.
6. Verify that the same has been printed on the Dot Matrix Printer.
7. Repeat Steps 1 to 6 for the several Digital Input
1 Verify that separate logs are available for alarm and events □
2 Verify that suitable filters (sorting by date, time etc) are provided □
for both alarms and events
3 Verify that an Alarm and Event is displayed in the Alarm and Event □
Screen with proper description and Time Stamp
4 Verify the alarm acknowledgement facility and verify that their □
display changes in alarm viewer according to the alarm status
(active/inactive; acknowledged/not acknowledged)
Checked Comments see log sheet no.
Event processing - BCU □
- HMI
□
Verify by:
POWERGRID Representative Manufacturer Representative
Signature : Signature :
Name : Name :
Date : Date :
P a g e 24
Factory Simulation Test (FST) /Factory Acceptance Test (FAT) Procedure Rev0.doc
Doc. No. : PG/CC/AM/STD/SAS/FAT Rev0
□
Time tagging - BCU
- HMI □
Filter function - date/time □
- message group □
- message text □
- alarm group □
Check naming convention of one typical feeder
according signal list □
- hierarchical name
- signal name
□
Voltage Measurement:
Injected Expected Dead Indicated Value
second. measured band
Voltage value
R Y B
BCU HMI BCU HMI BCU HMI
6.35V
31.75V
63.5V
70V
Verify by:
POWERGRID Representative Manufacturer Representative
Signature : Signature :
Name : Name :
Date : Date :
P a g e 26
Factory Simulation Test (FST) /Factory Acceptance Test (FAT) Procedure Rev0.doc
Doc. No. : PG/CC/AM/STD/SAS/FAT Rev0
110V
Frequency Measurement:
Injected Dead band 48Hz 50Hz 52Hz
Frequency
BCU HMI BCU HMI BCU HMI
Indicated Value
Injected Phase
Value Angle
Active Reactive Power Factor
Power Power
V with Calculat BCU HMI Err. Expecte BCU HMI Err. ( %) Calculat BCU HMI Err.(%)
ref. to I ed (%) d Value ed
Value Value
I= 0° 1
U=
60° 0.5
90° 0
120° -0.5
-120° 0.5
-60° -0.5
........................................................... °C
Verify by:
POWERGRID Representative Manufacturer Representative
Signature : Signature :
Name : Name :
Date : Date :
P a g e 27
Factory Simulation Test (FST) /Factory Acceptance Test (FAT) Procedure Rev0.doc
Doc. No. : PG/CC/AM/STD/SAS/FAT Rev0
........................................................... °C
having been transgressed an alarm shall be generated and the value displayed on the VDU shall be
identified as in alarm status by use of color or other means to the approval of engineer.
Setup
Ensure setup as per approved SAS Architecture Drawing.
Procedure
1. With both Servers operational, verify that Clients are connected with their respective servers &
can perform normal function i.e. open different screens, alarm & trend screen.
2. On OWS-1 (Server1), Close the Server1 Application.
3. Check that Alarm appear on the client.
4. Observe that Client1 are now connected with the Server2
Verify by:
POWERGRID Representative Manufacturer Representative
Signature : Signature :
Name : Name :
Date : Date :
P a g e 29
Factory Simulation Test (FST) /Factory Acceptance Test (FAT) Procedure Rev0.doc
Doc. No. : PG/CC/AM/STD/SAS/FAT Rev0
5. Start the Server1 application on OWS1, Observe that Client1 are now connected with the OWS1
after some defined period of interval.
6. On OWS-2 (Server2), Close the Server2 Application.
7. Observe that Client2 are now connected with the Server1.
8. Check that Alarm appear on the client.
9. Start the Server2 application on OWS2, Observe that Client2 are now connected with the OWS2
after some defined period of interval.
Purpose
To verify that the HMI Redundancy is operational during the shutdown of the active server.
Setup
Ensure setup as per approved SAS Architecture Drawing.
Procedure
1. With both Servers operational, verify that Clients are connected with OWS-1.
2. Shutdown OWS-1. Observe that Client is now connected with the OWS-2 and receives
communications from the remote devices.
3. Startup OWS-1 . Observe that there is no interruption to the Bay Level Devices. Restart the Client.
4. Observe that Client is now connected with the OWS-1 (Primary Server) and receives
communications from the remote devices.
5. Shutdown OWS-2. Observe that Client is still connected with OWS-1.
6. Startup OWS-2. Observe that there is no interruption to the Bay Level Devices.
Voltage Level substation controller/Servers Checked Switch over Comments see log
time sheet no.
Server1 faulty:
Disconnect Server1 from LAN and generate
new inputs (events and alarms) on BCU.
Initiate control of any switching device.
• Check switchover of connected HMIs to SC 2
• Check updating of information □
event/alarm/analogue appearance on HMI 1 □
&2
• Check execution of command □
• Check event/alarm appearance on dot □
printer
• Check fault indication of SC 1
□
Server2 faulty: (Server1 healthy again)
Disconnect Server2 from LAN and generate □
new inputs (events and alarms) on BCU.
Initiate control of any switching device. □
• Check switchover of connected HMIs to □
Server 1
• Check updating of information □
event/alarm/analogue appearance on HMI 1 □
&2
Verify by:
POWERGRID Representative Manufacturer Representative
Signature : Signature :
Name : Name :
Date : Date :
P a g e 30
Factory Simulation Test (FST) /Factory Acceptance Test (FAT) Procedure Rev0.doc
Doc. No. : PG/CC/AM/STD/SAS/FAT Rev0
1. Choose a Switch in the LAN. Let it be Switch B in below fig having switches A & B adjacent to it.
There are two ports, 3 & 4 of switch B connected to two ports, 1 & 2 of switch A. Similarly
there are 2 other ports in switch B, 5 & 6 connected to ports 7 & 8 of switch C (as shown in
figure).
1 3 5 7
Switch A Switch B Switch C
2 4 6 8
Verify by:
POWERGRID Representative Manufacturer Representative
Signature : Signature :
Name : Name :
Date : Date :
P a g e 31
Factory Simulation Test (FST) /Factory Acceptance Test (FAT) Procedure Rev0.doc
Doc. No. : PG/CC/AM/STD/SAS/FAT Rev0
2. On switch B Disconnect port 3 LAN cable. Verify that no device in the entire system fails to
communicate.
3. On switch B Disconnect port 4 LAN cable. Verify that no device in the entire system fails to
communicate.
4. On switch B Disconnect port 5 LAN cable. Verify that no device in the entire system fails to
communicate.
5. On switch B Disconnect port 6 LAN cable. Verify that only those devices, which are connected
to switch B, fail to communicate.
6. Restore the LAN cables in reverse order and check that communication of the devices above
gets restored.
7. Repeat the above for all other switches in the Redundant RING LAN.
3 Networking Panel
SERVER-1
SERVER-2
OWS-1
OWS-2
DR/EWS PC
GATEWAY-1
GATEWAY-2
Verify by:
POWERGRID Representative Manufacturer Representative
Signature : Signature :
Name : Name :
Date : Date :
P a g e 36
Factory Simulation Test (FST) /Factory Acceptance Test (FAT) Procedure Rev0.doc
Doc. No. : PG/CC/AM/STD/SAS/FAT Rev0
• Configuration Management
• Fault Management
• Performance Monitoring
Note that the Network Management System is based on Simple Network Monitoring Protocol (SNMP).
Some background on this protocol is needed to understand how the application software works.
Procedure
1. Verify that NMS software used monitors LAN devices statistics and present these using displays.
2. Verify that it maintains connectivity and device status, issues alarms on errors conditions. This can
be verified in the OI client screens.
3. Verify that it has tools for maintenance of addressed and links.
Verify by:
POWERGRID Representative Manufacturer Representative
Signature : Signature :
Name : Name :
Date : Date :
P a g e 38
Factory Simulation Test (FST) /Factory Acceptance Test (FAT) Procedure Rev0.doc
Doc. No. : PG/CC/AM/STD/SAS/FAT Rev0
Testing of Typical Relays & BCU (One number of each type and function) is to be verified in Factory
Acceptance Test.
Purpose
To verify that the change of state of Digital Input points are updated in the BCU MMI, the Operator
Workstations and Master Station Simulator.
To verify that the Digital Inputs are mapped correctly as per the approved drawing.
Setup/Program
1. Connect the test jig to the BCU under test.
2. Go to the BCU MMI Digital Inputs Display screen.
3. On the OWS-1 go to relevant HMI screen.
4. On the OWS-2 go to Alarm/Event list.
Procedure
1. Select a Digital Input point on the BCU under test.
2. Change its state from ‘OFF’ to ‘ON’ (single points) or from ‘OPEN’ to ‘CLOSED’ (double points) by
toggling the corresponding jig.
3. Verify that the state of this point in the BCU MMI and HMI is changed correctly.
4. Verify that the state of this point in the OWS-2 event list screen is changed correctly.
5. For points configured with alarm, verify that alarms are displayed in the Alarm Screen of the OWS-
2 with correct time stamp.
6. For points considered in the IEC 60870-101 List, verify that the state of this point in the Master
Station Simulator is changed correctly with correct time stamp.
7. Change its state from ‘ON’ to ‘OFF’ (single points) or from ‘CLOSED’ to ‘OPEN’ (double points) by
toggling the corresponding jig.
8. Repeats step 3 to 6
9. Repeat 1 to 8 for all Digital Input points to be tested on this BCU.
10. Repeat steps 1 to 9 for all BCU’s.
Digital Output
Purpose
To verify that digital output operations are successfully executed.
To verify that the Digital Output points are mapped correctly according to the approved drawings &
Data List.
Setup/Program
1. Connect the test jig to the BCU under test.
2. Go to the BCU MMI Digital Outputs Display screen.
3. On the OWS-1 go to relevant HMI screen.
4. On the OWS-2 go to Alarm/Event list.
Procedure
1. Choose a BCU to test. From the HMI workstation initiate digital output requests.
Verify by:
POWERGRID Representative Manufacturer Representative
Signature : Signature :
Name : Name :
Date : Date :
P a g e 39
Factory Simulation Test (FST) /Factory Acceptance Test (FAT) Procedure Rev0.doc
Doc. No. : PG/CC/AM/STD/SAS/FAT Rev0
Interlock involving GOOSE signal shall also be checked. It shall be ensured that absence of required GOOSE signal does not
enable any interlocking condition.
Spare switching arrangement for Single phase reactor and transformer banks shall be verified by simulation and software
interlocks to be verified.
Verify by:
POWERGRID Representative Manufacturer Representative
Signature : Signature :
Name : Name :
Date : Date :
P a g e 40
Factory Simulation Test (FST) /Factory Acceptance Test (FAT) Procedure Rev0.doc
Doc. No. : PG/CC/AM/STD/SAS/FAT Rev0
2. Go to a remote device and disconnect the LAN cable, verify that the System Architecture screen
shows the bay device is Failed.
3. Connect the LAN cable. Monitor the communication between Server and remote device and verify
that the IEC 61850 packets between the two TCP/IP addresses are passing through.
4. Verify that the System Architecture Screen shows that the device is Normal.
5. Repeat the above procedures for other devices.
4. Comments
Any comments should be added in “log sheets”; a pattern is attached on next page.
Description
5. Glossary:
BCU: Bay Control Unit
DR: Disturbance Recorder
EWS: Engineering Work Station
FAT: Factory Acceptance Test
FPT: Functional Performance Test
FST: Factory Simulation Test
GTW: Gateway
GPS : Global Positioning System
IED: Intelligent Electronic Device
NMS: Network Management (Monitoring) System
OWS: Operator Workstation
RCC: Remote Control Centre
RSCC: Regional System Co-ordination Centre
SAS: Sub-station Automation System
SAT: Site Acceptance Test
SCADA: System Control & Monitoring System
Verify by:
POWERGRID Representative Manufacturer Representative
Signature : Signature :
Name : Name :
Date : Date :
P a g e 42
Factory Simulation Test (FST) /Factory Acceptance Test (FAT) Procedure Rev0.doc