Motion 2: AI should be used in classrooms to personalize student learning.

*Definition:

+ AI, or artificial intelligence, refers to the simulation of human intelligence in machines that can perform tasks such as
learning, problem-solving, and decision-making.

+ personalize student learning: refers to tailoring educational content, methods, and pace to suit the individual needs,
preferences, and abilities of each student.

Proposition: Đồng ý

Speaker 1: Introduction and Personalized Learning

Ladies and gentlemen, honorable judges, and esteemed opposition,

We firmly support the motion: "AI should be used in classrooms to personalize student learning." Education is not
one-size-fits-all. Every student learns differently—some excel in a fast-paced environment, while others need
additional time and support. However, traditional classrooms often struggle to accommodate these diverse needs.
Our first argument is that AI revolutionizes personalized learning.

 Reason: AI can analyze individual student data, such as their pace of learning, strengths, and weaknesses,
to provide customized lessons. Imagine a student struggling with fractions. An AI system like Khan
Academy will adapt, offering extra exercises and video tutorials tailored to that concept until mastery is
achieved. On the other hand, an advanced student can access challenging content that pushes them beyond
the curriculum.

 Evidence: A 2024 study from the World Economic Forum showed that students using AI tools
experienced a 24% improvement in learning outcomes compared to those in traditional settings. Adaptive
technologies like Duolingo’s language learning platform provide a tangible example of this success.
Duolingo adjusts question difficulty in real-time, ensuring a balance between challenge and comfort.

 Impact: Personalized learning through AI creates an equitable environment where no student is left
behind. Struggling learners receive the support they need, and high-achievers are empowered to soar
higher.

To conclude, AI is not just a tool—it is a bridge to a more inclusive and effective educational experience.

Speaker 2: Enhancing Teacher Efficiency

Honorable judges,
While AI greatly benefits students, it also transforms how teachers work. This brings us to our second argument:
AI enhances teacher efficiency, allowing educators to focus on meaningful interaction with their students.

 Reason: Teachers often spend hours grading papers, creating lesson plans, and tracking student progress
—time that could be better spent mentoring students. AI streamlines these tasks. For example, systems like
Google Classroom automatically grade multiple-choice tests, freeing teachers from repetitive work.

 Evidence: According to the ArtSmart Report (2024), teachers using AI for administrative tasks saved an
average of 10 hours per week. Tools like Grammarly not only check grammar but suggest improvements
in student writing, providing instant feedback that would take a teacher much longer to deliver.
  Practical example: Imagine a teacher in a large class of 40 students. With AI analyzing homework
patterns, the teacher is notified that 10 students are struggling with geometry. This insight allows the
teacher to design targeted lessons or hold personalized consultations.

 Impact: By reducing their workload, teachers can spend more time engaging with students, addressing
their emotional and academic needs. This strengthens the teacher-student relationship, which remains
irreplaceable despite technological advances.In conclusion, AI empowers teachers to prioritize what truly
matters: nurturing and inspiring their students.

Speaker 3: Future Skills and Rebuttal

Ladies and gentlemen,

Our final argument focuses on the future. AI equips students with critical skills necessary for thriving in the
4.0 era.

 Reason: The modern job market demands adaptability, problem-solving, and technological fluency. AI in
classrooms prepares students for these challenges by fostering these exact skills. For instance, coding
platforms like Scratch or PythonTutor, powered by AI, guide students in problem-solving while learning
programming— a skill increasingly valued across industries.

 Evidence: A 2024 LinkedIn Learning Report revealed that 75% of employers prioritize candidates with AI
literacy. In addition, 43% of higher education students already use AI tools to enhance their academic
performance, demonstrating its growing relevance.

 Impact: Integrating AI in education is not just an investment in today’s students but in tomorrow’s
workforce. It ensures they are competitive in an evolving global economy.

 Rebuttal to the Opposition: The opposing team may argue that AI creates dependency or diminishes the
role of teachers. However, we emphasize that AI is a tool, not a replacement. Teachers remain the
architects of education, guiding how AI is used. Far from diminishing their importance, AI amplifies their
impact by enabling more focused, tailored, and meaningful teaching.

 Conclusion: To summarize, AI is not merely enhancing education; it is reshaping the future of learning.
Let us embrace this opportunity to empower both students and teachers alike. Education is not about
resisting change but embracing tools that make learning inclusive, efficient, and future-ready. AI in
classrooms is not just an option—it is a necessity for progress."

Opposition: Phản đối

Honorable judges, esteemed audience, thank you for your time. Picture a classroom where every student is personalized
with technology, but the human touch is missing. Is this the future we want for education? Today, we stand in opposition
to the motion that "AI should be used in classrooms to personalize student learning." While AI offers some advantages,
we believe it will lead to more harm than good. Education is not just about efficiency; it's about connection, equality, and
nurturing each student’s potential. We will present three key arguments showing why AI should not be used in
classrooms.

Speaker 1: AI Reduces Critical Human Interaction in Education

Education is not just about efficiency; it's about connection, equality, and nurturing each student’s potential. Picture a
classroom where every student is personalized with technology, but the human touch is missing. Is this the future we
want for education? Today, we stand in opposition to the motion that "AI should be used in classrooms to personalize
student learning."

Next, I’d like to present our first argument, which is: AI reduces critical human interaction in education.

 Reason: Human interaction is crucial in education. Teachers not only deliver lessons but also guide, encourage,
and inspire students. AI lacks the ability to provide emotional support, adapt to unique student needs, and build
relationships, which are vital for students' personal growth. Over-reliance on AI risks turning education into a
mechanical, impersonal process.

 Evidence: A study by the OECD (2021) revealed that students who had more interactions with teachers scored
10% higher in problem-solving tests compared to those heavily reliant on technology.

 Practical Example: Imagine a classroom where students rely solely on AI programs for feedback. While they
may receive tailored responses, they miss out on emotional support and guidance, which only a teacher can
provide when a student struggles.

 Impact: Lack of human interaction can hinder students' emotional growth and communication skills, which are
vital for collaboration, leadership, and adapting to real-life situations. Without these skills, students may struggle
to thrive in workplaces or communities where emotional intelligence is critical.

 Conclusion: In conclusion, over-reliance on AI can erode essential teacher-student relationships, depriving

students of the mentorship they need for overall success.

Speaker 2: AI Can Reinforce Inequalities Among Students

Honorable judges, while proponents of AI claim that it provides personalized learning, it also risks deepening existing
inequalities in our education system. This brings us to our second argument: AI can reinforce inequalities among
students.

 Reason: AI systems require advanced infrastructure—devices, internet access, and trained staff—which not all
students have. Wealthier schools are more likely to implement AI effectively, while underfunded schools are left
behind. This creates a divide where some students benefit from personalized learning while others fall further
behind.

 Evidence: According to UNESCO (2023), only 30% of schools in low-income regions have the necessary
technology for AI-based learning, compared to 95% in high-income areas.

 Practical Example: Consider a rural school with limited internet access. While urban schools enjoy advanced AI
systems, rural students struggle with outdated materials, deepening the divide between their opportunities and
achievements.

 Impact: AI-based learning systems could prioritize privileged students, leaving disadvantaged communities
further behind in education. This creates a cycle where the rich have access to better education and opportunities,
while the poor face increasing barriers.

 Conclusion: Instead of bridging gaps, AI risks creating unequal opportunities, undermining the principle of fair
access to quality education.

Speaker 3: AI is Prone to Errors and Lacks Ethical Judgment

Honorable judges, while AI may seem like an infallible tool, it is far from perfect. This brings us to our third and final
argument: AI is prone to errors and lacks ethical judgment.

 Reason: AI systems are only as good as the data they are trained on, and this data is often biased or incomplete.
Unlike human teachers who can make ethical decisions and adapt to individual situations, AI operates rigidly and
lacks the judgment needed to navigate complex human learning needs.

 Evidence:
The Stanford Human-Centered AI Institute (2022) found that 40% of AI systems used in education had biases
that led to inappropriate learning suggestions for minority students.

 Practical Example:
For instance, an AI tool may misclassify a student’s learning style based on incomplete data, leading to
frustration and disengagement rather than effective learning.

 Impact:
AI’s inability to adapt ethically and critically to students' unique needs could harm their academic journeys,
potentially leading to mistrust in the educational system.

 Conclusion:
Education is not just about personalization; it’s about equity, growth, and preparing students for life beyond
algorithms. Let us ensure that human-driven learning remains at the heart of education.

Summary: In summary, we oppose using AI in classrooms because it diminishes essential teacher-student interaction,
reinforces inequalities, and lacks the ethical judgment required for effective education. While technology has its place, it
must complement, not replace, the critical human elements in learning.