Instant Download for Macroeconomics 7th Edition Hubbard Solutions Manual 2024 Full Chapters in PDF
Instant Download for Macroeconomics 7th Edition Hubbard Solutions Manual 2024 Full Chapters in PDF
Instant Download for Macroeconomics 7th Edition Hubbard Solutions Manual 2024 Full Chapters in PDF
https://testbankdeal.com
https://testbankdeal.com/product/macroeconomics-
7th-edition-hubbard-solutions-manual/
https://testbankdeal.com/product/macroeconomics-7th-edition-hubbard-
test-bank/
testbankdeal.com
https://testbankdeal.com/product/macroeconomics-5th-edition-hubbard-
solutions-manual/
testbankdeal.com
https://testbankdeal.com/product/macroeconomics-6th-edition-hubbard-
solutions-manual/
testbankdeal.com
https://testbankdeal.com/product/cultural-landscape-an-introduction-
to-human-geography-11th-edition-rubenstein-solutions-manual/
testbankdeal.com
Canadian Business Law Today Canadian 1st Edition Breen
Test Bank
https://testbankdeal.com/product/canadian-business-law-today-
canadian-1st-edition-breen-test-bank/
testbankdeal.com
https://testbankdeal.com/product/c-how-to-program-early-objects-
version-9th-edition-deitel-test-bank/
testbankdeal.com
https://testbankdeal.com/product/western-civilization-a-brief-
history-11th-edition-perry-test-bank/
testbankdeal.com
https://testbankdeal.com/product/zoology-10th-edition-miller-
solutions-manual/
testbankdeal.com
https://testbankdeal.com/product/groups-process-and-practice-9th-
edition-corey-test-bank/
testbankdeal.com
South Western Federal Taxation 2019 Comprehensive 42nd
Edition Maloney Solutions Manual
https://testbankdeal.com/product/south-western-federal-
taxation-2019-comprehensive-42nd-edition-maloney-solutions-manual/
testbankdeal.com
CHAPTER 9 | Unemployment and Inflation
9.5 Using Price Indexes to Adjust for the Effects of Inflation (pages 298–300)
Use price indexes to adjust for the effects of inflation.
▪ To correct for the effects of inflation, we divide a nominal variable by a price index and
multiply by 100 to obtain a real variable.
9.6 Nominal Interest Rates versus Real Interest Rates (pages 301–302)
Distinguish between the nominal interest rate and the real interest rate.
▪ The real interest rate is the nominal interest rate minus the inflation rate.
Key Terms
Consumer price index (CPI), p. 296. A Labor force participation rate, p. 282. The
measure of the average of the prices a typical percentage of the working-age population in the
urban family of four pays for the goods and labor force.
services they purchase.
Menu costs, p. 303. The costs to firms of
Cyclical unemployment, p. 291. Unemployment changing prices.
caused by a business cycle recession.
Natural rate of unemployment, p. 292. The
Deflation, p. 302. A decline in the price level. normal rate of unemployment, consisting of
frictional unemployment and structural
Discouraged workers, p. 281. People who are unemployment.
available for work but have not looked for a job
during the previous four weeks because they Nominal interest rate, p. 301. The stated
believe no jobs are available for them. interest rate on a loan.
Efficiency wage, p. 295. An above-market wage Price level, p. 295. A measure of the average
that a firm pays to increase workers’ prices of goods and services in the economy.
productivity.
Producer price index (PPI), p. 298. An average
Employed, p. 280. In government statistics, of the prices received by producers of goods and
someone who currently has a job or who is services at all stages of the production process.
temporarily away from his or her job.
Real interest rate, p. 301. The nominal interest
Employment-population ratio, p. 282. The rate minus the inflation rate.
percentage of the working-age population that is
employed. Structural unemployment, p. 291.
Unemployment that arises from a persistent
Frictional unemployment, p. 291. Short-term mismatch between the skills or attributes of
unemployment that arises from the process of workers and the requirements of jobs.
matching workers with jobs.
Unemployed, p. 280. In government statistics,
Inflation rate, p. 295. The percentage increase someone who is not currently at work but who is
in the price level from one year to the next. available for work and who has actively looked
for work during the previous month.
Labor force, p. 280. The sum of employed and
unemployed workers in the economy. Unemployment rate, p. 280. The percentage of
the labor force that is unemployed.
Chapter Outline
Why Would Boeing Cut Thousands of Jobs As the Economy Expands?
Boeing Company is one of the world’s largest manufacturers of commercial and military aircraft. During
recessions, air travel declines and airlines cut back on orders for new planes. The recession of 2001 caused a
decline of more than 50 percent of Boeing’s deliveries of planes. As a result, the firm laid off 30,000
workers. The recession of 2007–2009 caused Boeing to lay off 7,000 workers. By 2015, Boeing’s deliveries
of planes reached a new peak, before declining again in 2016. Boeing faced three challenges. First, it had to
cut prices to compete with rival firms such as Airbus Group and Bombardier. Second, Airbus had made
improvements to its competing A320 model and began winning a majority of new orders for jetliners. Third,
cuts to military spending harmed sales in Boeing’s defense and space unit.
G. Revisions in the Establishment Survey Employment Data: How Bad Was the
2007–2009 Recession?
To avoid long waits in supplying data, such as the employment data from the establishment survey, to
policymakers and the general public, government agencies typically issue preliminary estimates that they
revise as additional information becomes available.
Teaching Tips
The end of the chapter in the main text includes a special category of exercises titled Real-Time Data
Exercises (RTDA). These exercises help students become familiar with a key data source, learn how to
locate data, and develop skills in interpreting data. Those exercises marked with a red circle allow
students and instructors to use the latest data from the Web site of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis
(FRED). Many RTDA exercises require more elaborate calculations than other problems as well as the
use of Excel spreadsheets.
Extra
How Unusual Was the Unemployment Situation Following the
Apply the
2007–2009 Recession?
Concept
The Great Depression of the 1930s left its mark on nearly everyone who lived through it. The Depression
began in August 1929, became worse after the stock market crash in October 1929, and reached its lowest
point in 1933, following the collapse of the banking system. Real GDP fell by more than 25 percent
between 1929 and 1933—the largest decline ever recorded. The unemployment rate in 1933 was above 20
percent—the highest rate ever recorded. The unemployment rate did not return to its 1929 level until
1942, the year after the United States entered World War II. With the unemployment rate so high for so
long, many people were out of work for years. As one historian put it: “What was distinctive about the
Great Depression, in fact, was . . . the extraordinary lengths of time that most jobless men and women
remained out of work.”
By the 2000s, many people in the United States, including most economists and policymakers, believed
that prolonged periods of unemployment such as the U.S. economy had suffered from during the 1930s
were very unlikely to happen again. Although the 1981–1982 recession had been severe and the
unemployment rate had risen above 10 percent for the first time since the 1930s, the recovery was strong,
and many unemployed workers found new jobs relatively quickly. So, following the 2007–2009
recession, most economists and policymakers were unprepared for how slowly the unemployment rate
declined and for how much the average period of unemployment rose. During the 1981–1982 recession,
the unemployment rate peaked at 10.8 percent in December 1982, but 18 months later, in June 1984, it
had already declined to 7.2 percent. In contrast, after the recession of 2007–2009, the unemployment rate
peaked at 10.0 percent in October 2009, while 18 months later it had declined by only 1 percentage point
to 9.0 percent. The following figure shows that the average period of unemployment was twice as high
following the 2007–2009 recession as following any other recession since the end of World War II.
Unemployment was so persistent and widespread that a survey taken by the Pew Research Center in the
spring of 2011 found that more than half of all households had experienced at least one member losing his
or her job during the previous year. Another Pew survey taken in June 2011 found that more than half of
people with jobs expected to receive a pay cut or to lose their job during the next year. As we have seen,
one drawback to the unemployment data is that workers who drop out of the labor market are no longer
counted by the BLS as unemployed. As a result, some economists focus on the employment–population
ratio because it measures the fraction of the population that has jobs. The following figure shows the
employment–population ratio for the period from 1948 through mid-2013. The overall upward trend of
the ratio reflects the increased labor force participation rate of women. In each recession, the
employment–population ratio falls as some workers lose their jobs. The fall of the employment–
population ratio was particularly dramatic during the recession of 2007–2009, and the ratio was actually
even lower four years after the end of the recession. The fall of the employment–population ratio may be
the best indication of how weak the U.S. labor market was during and after the 2007–2009 recession.
As we will see in later chapters, explaining the weakness of the U.S. labor market during these years had
become a top priority of economists and policymakers.
Sources: Alexander Keyssar, Out of Work: The First Century of Unemployment in Massachusetts, New York: Cambridge University
Press, 1986, p. 290; Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis; U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics; Pew Research Center, “The Recession,
Economic Stress, and Optimism,” May 4, 2011; and Pew Research Center, “Views of Personal Finances,” June 23, 2011.
Question
An article published in the New York Times in July 2011 argued: “For the second straight year, the
recovery in the job market has essentially stalled. This chart, showing the share of adults with jobs, offers
the best summary you’ll find.” The “share of adults with jobs” is known more formally as the
employment–population ratio. Why might the employment–population ratio provide the “best summary”
of the state of the job market rather than the unemployment rate?
Source: David Leonhardt, “Overly Optimistic, Once Again,” New York Times, July 8, 2011.
Answer
A weakness of the unemployment rate is that it does not count as unemployed those workers who drop
out of the labor force. As a result, some economists focus on the employment-population ratio because it
measures the fraction of the working-age population that has jobs.
B. Structural Unemployment
Structural unemployment is unemployment that arises from a persistent mismatch between the skills or
attributes of workers and the requirements of jobs. This type of unemployment can last for longer periods
than frictional unemployment because workers need time to learn new skills.
C. Cyclical Unemployment
When the economy moves into recession, many firms find their sales falling and cut back on production.
As production falls, firms lay off workers. Cyclical unemployment is unemployment caused by a
business cycle recession.
D. Full Employment
The natural rate of unemployment is the normal rate of unemployment, consisting of frictional
unemployment and structural unemployment. The natural rate of unemployment is also called the full-
employment rate of unemployment.
Teaching Tips
Though categorizing unemployment as frictional, structural, or cyclical is useful in understanding the
sources of unemployment, the Bureau of Labor Statistics provides estimates of total unemployment. It
does not classify unemployment as frictional, structural, or cyclical.
a. Calculate the percentage of the unemployed who lost their jobs (Job Losers) and the percentage
that left their jobs (Job Leavers) from 2008 to 2014.
b. Calculate the percentage of the unemployed who were unemployed as the result of entering the
labor force, either for the first time or as reentrants, from 2008 to 2014.
Step 3: Calculate the percentage of the unemployed who were unemployed as the result
of entering the labor force from 2008 to 2014.
The percentage of reentrants and new entrants for 2008 is [(2,472 + 766)/8,924] 100 = 36.3
percent. The percentages for each year are included final column in the above table. The main
source of unemployment is job losers, followed by reentrants and new entrants. There were
more reentrants—people who lost or quit jobs in the past, dropped out of the labor force and
are now looking for new jobs—than new entrants to the labor force.
In 1938, the federal government enacted a minimum-wage law. If the minimum wage is set above the
market wage, the quantity supplied of labor will be greater than the quantity of labor demanded. As a result,
the unemployment rate will be higher than it would be without the minimum wage. Studies estimate that a
10 percent increase in the minimum wage reduces teenage unemployment by about 2 percent.
B. Labor Unions
Labor unions are organizations of workers that bargain with employers for higher wages and better
working conditions for their members. In unionized industries, the wage is usually above what otherwise
would be the market wage, but most economists believe that this does not result in an increase in the
overall unemployment rate because only about 6.5 percent of workers outside the government sector are
unionized.
C. Efficiency Wages
An efficiency wage is an above-market wage that a firm pays to increase workers’ productivity.
Efficiency wages are another reason economies experience some unemployment even when cyclical
unemployment is zero.
33 percent in 1948 to 57 percent in 2016. In the early part of the twenty-first century, the labor force will
be affected by the aging of the “baby boomers”—Americans born between 1946 and 1964. According to
the U.S. Census Bureau by 2050 the number of Americans aged 65 and older is expected to rise to 83.7
million from about 47.8 million in 2015. Despite improvements in health care and the increased life
expectancy of Americans, many older workers are leaving the labor force. In 1960, 78 percent of men
between the ages 60 and 64 and 31 percent of men 65 years and older were in the labor force. Today these
figures are about 55 percent and 17 percent, respectively. The average age of retirement today is 62,
compared to an average age of 65 in 1965.
There are several reasons why many workers today retire earlier than in years past. First, many boomers
have greater disposable incomes than people in other age groups and choose to use this income to
consume more leisure. Second, career advancement becomes more difficult after age 40. Third, over
60 percent of U.S. corporations offer older workers early retirement plans, while only about 5 percent
offer incentives to delay retirement. If these trends continue, the disappearance of baby boomers from the
labor force will have a significant impact on the size of the labor force.
a. What effect will the retirement of the baby boomers have on the unemployment rate?
b. Can the size of the labor force increase despite of the retirement of older workers?
Step 2: What effect will the retirement of baby boomers will have on the unemployment
rate?
Holding other factors that affect the labor force constant, as baby boomers retire, the
unemployment rate will rise because the numerator of the unemployment rate formula would
not change much (relatively few baby boomers are unemployed), while the denominator
becomes smaller as the labor force declines.
Step 3: Explain whether the size of the labor force can increase despite the retirement of
older workers.
It is possible, but unlikely, that the labor force will increase due to the retirement of older
workers, because the birth rate in the 1980s and 1990s was less than in the 1950s and 1960s.
To offset the decline in the labor force due to the retirement of the baby boomers, there would
have to be new job seekers—either immigrants or current U.S. residents who had not been in
the labor force.
The price level is a measure of the average prices of goods and services in the economy. The inflation
rate is the percentage increase in the price level from one year to the next. The GDP deflator is the
broadest measure of the price level, but to know the impact of inflation on the typical household, the
deflator can be misleading. Changes in the consumer price index come closest to measuring changes in
the cost of living as experienced by the typical household.
Theatre
Admission
for One Diet
Year Person Popcorn Pizza Coke
1 $5.00 $2.00 $12.00 $1.25
2 6.00 2.50 12.50 1.40
3 6.50 3.00 13.00 1.50
Assume that Year 1 is the base year. Calculate the value of the CPI for each year and the rate of inflation
for Years 2 and 3.
Step 3: Calculate the value of the CPI and the inflation rates for Years 2 and 3.
The CPI is the ratio of the value of the market basket in a given year to the value of the
market basket in the base year, multiplied by 100. We can use the CPI to calculate the
inflation rate, which is the percentage change in the CPI from Year 1 to Year 2 and from Year
2 to Year 3. These values are in the following table:
Value of the
Market Rate of
Year Basket CPI Inflation
1 $25.25 100.0 —
2 28.40 112.5 12.5%
3 30.50 120.8 7.4%
Extra
Explaining How the CPI Measures the Price Level and Rate of
Apply the
Inflation
Concept
There are many misconceptions about how the consumer price index (CPI) is constructed and exactly
what it measures. Economists John Greenlees and Robert McCelland addressed these misconceptions in
an article published in the Monthly Labor Review. They explain that “…when prices change, the goal of
the CPI is to measure the percentage by which consumers would have to increase their spending to be as
well off with the new prices as they were with the old prices…” The following information regarding the
CPI and its construction are taken from the Greenlees and McCelland article.
Since 1978, the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) has published the CPI for all urban consumers (CPI-U)
and the CPI for urban wage earners and clerical workers (CPI-W). Though the items and prices included
in both indexes are the same, the weights given to some of the index components differ. The U.S. Census
Bureau administers a Telephone Point-of-Purchase Survey in which consumers are asked where they
recently purchased goods and services. The BLS uses these data to select a sample of grocery stores,
service stations, doctors’ offices and other locations at which to collect prices. Representative samples of
items from these locations are selected and prices of the items are collected regularly by BLS employees.
Individual item-area indexes are constructed and the indexes are averaged together using weights based
on the Consumer Expenditure Survey, which is conducted for the BLS by the Census Bureau.
The all-items CPI-U is the CPI that is reported most widely, but the CPI-U and the CPI-W are both used
to make cost-of-living adjustments. The CPI-W is the index used to make annual Social Security and
federal retirement cost-of-living adjustments and is often used for periodic wage adjustments in collective
bargaining agreements. The CPI-U is used for indexation of tax brackets and personal exemption amounts
in the federal tax system. CPI data are also used in the construction of the National Income and Products
Accounts (NIPA). For example, CPI component indexes are inputs into the NIPA Personal Consumption
Expenditures (PCE) price index and are used in the calculation of real GDP.
In 2002, the BLS began publishing the chained Consumer Price Index for urban consumers (C-CPI-U).
This more closely approximates a cost-of-living index by reflecting consumer substitution among item
categories. Over time, some goods and services consumers commonly bought are replaced by new goods
and services. Adjustments to the CPI must be made to avoid having a shrinking market basket that is
unrepresentative of what consumers are buying. For many food items, the substitution is facilitated
because the BLS measures prices on a per-ounce or per-pound basis, rather than a per-item, basis.
Greenlees and McCelland use a simple example of a maker of a candy bar that replaces a 1-ounce bar
with a 1.5-ounce bar that sells for the same 75 cent price. The BLS would record a 50 percent increase in
price rather than recording that the price of the bar had not changed. More complicated adjustments are
required when an item, such as a standard-definition television set, is replaced in a store by a high-
definition set that has a much higher price, but also higher quality. The BLS uses sophisticated techniques
to estimate how much of the price difference is due to the higher quality of the set, rather than an increase
in price for a given quality.
Source: John S. Greenlees and Robert B. McCelland, “Addressing misconceptions about the Consumer Price Index,” Monthly
Labor Review, August 2008, pp. 3–19.
Using Price Indexes to Adjust for the Effects of Inflation (pages 298–300)
9.5 Learning Objective: Use price indexes to adjust for the effects of inflation.
Price indexes give us a way of adjusting for the effects of inflation so that we can compare dollar values
from different years. To correct for the effects of inflation, we divide a nominal variable by a price index
and multiply by 100 to obtain a real variable. Economic variables that are calculated in current-year
prices are referred to as nominal variables.
Step 2: Begin by defining the real wage in 2013 and 2018 and explaining what the
values of the real wage represent.
The number of dollars a worker receives is the worker’s nominal wage. To calculate the
worker’s real wage, we have to divide the nominal wage by the CPI for that year and multiply
by 100. We can make the following calculations for the two years:
For 2013:
$27
100 = $11.59
233
For 2018:
$27
100 = $10.38
260
The base year for the CPI is the average of prices during the period 1982–1984. So, the
values for the real wage we calculated are in 1982–1984 dollars. In other words, these values
for the real wage tell us that in 2013, $27 would buy what $11.59 would have bought in
1982–1984, and that in 2018, $27 would buy what $10.38 would have bought in 1982–1984.
Step 3: Complete the answer by calculating the percentage change in the real wage
Caterpillar workers will receive.
This percentage change equals:
$10.38 − $11.59
100 = −10.4%.
$11.59
We can conclude that if the estimate of the CPI in 2018 is correct, an average Caterpillar worker
will experience about a 10 percent decline in his or her real wage between 2013 and 2018.
Extra Credit: The values we computed for the real wages Caterpillar workers earn are measured in
1982–1984 dollars. Because this period is more than 30 years ago, the values are somewhat difficult to
interpret. We can convert the earnings to 2013 or 2018 dollars by using the method we used earlier to
calculate your mother’s salary. But notice that, for purposes of calculating the change in the value of real
average hourly earnings over time, the base year of the price index doesn’t matter. The change from 2013
to 2018 would still be −10.4 percent, no matter what the base year of the price index was. If you don’t see
that this is true, test it by using the mother’s salary method to calculate the real wage for 2013 and 2018 in
2013 dollars. Then calculate the percentage change. Unless you make an arithmetic error, you should find
that the answer is still −10.4 percent.
Question
In 1924, the famous novelist F. Scott Fitzgerald wrote an article for the Saturday Evening Post titled
“How to Live on $36,000 a Year,” in which he wondered how he and his wife had managed to spend all
of that very high income without saving any of it. The CPI in 1924 was 17, and the CPI in 2012 was 230.
What income would you have needed in 2012 to have had the same purchasing power that Fitzgerald’s
$36,000 had in 1924? Be sure to show your calculation.
Source: F. Scott Fitzgerald, “How to Live on $36,000 a Year,” Saturday Evening Post, April 5, 1924.
Answer
We can convert Fitzgerald’s 1924 nominal income of $36,000 to an equivalent income in 2012 by
multiplying the 1924 nominal income by the ratio of the CPI for 2012 to the CPI for 1924: $36,000 ×
(230/17) = $487,059. So, you would have needed an income of $487,059 in 2012 to have the same
purchasing power that Fitzgerald’s $36,000 had in 1924.
a. What was the real interest rate in the years 1981, 1984, 1985, 2014, 2015, and 2016?
b. In which of these years was the real interest highest? In which years was the real interest rate
negative?
Step 2: Calculate the real interest rate for the years 1981, 1984, 1985, 2014, 2015, and 2016.
Real interest rates for the given years are
1981 1984 1985 2014 2015 2016
3.65 5.15 3.95 −1.58 −.07 −0.96
Step 3: In which of these years was the real interest rate highest? In which years was the
real interest rate negative?
The real interest rate was highest, 5.15 percent, in 1984 and was negative in 2014, 2015, and
2016. A negative real interest rate means that lenders are receiving a negative real return on
funds they have loaned. Eventually, nominal interest rates must rise to make the real interest
rate positive. At some point investors will demand a positive interest rate in order to convince
them to keep buying Treasury bills.
Extra
Low Real Interest Rates on Treasury Debt Force Investors to
Apply the
Consider Alternatives
Concept
The federal government’s deficit declined from $1.4 trillion in fiscal year (October 1–September 30) 2009
to $439 billion in fiscal year 2015. Although the size of deficit fell, the total national debt climbed to over
$19 trillion in 2016. The U.S. Treasury has to sell hundreds of billions of dollars in securities annually to
pay interest on this debt. Holding the demand constant, an increase in supply of Treasury securities will
lead to lower prices and higher interest rates. But because the demand for Treasury securities also
increased, interest rates remained low throughout 2015. Low real interest rates encourage firms and
consumers to borrow to fund construction of new buildings, equipment and purchases of automobiles and
other durable goods. But bondholders and retirees who seek steady income view low real interest rates on
Treasury securities differently. William Gross, cofounder of PIMCO, the world’s largest bond fund
advised bondholders to “. . . find something else that’s attractive.” While Princeton economist Burton
Malkiel agreed that U.S. Treasury securities are currently poor choices for investors, he endorsed two
other types of bonds: (1) Tax-exempt municipal bonds, issued by state and local governments, that offer
yields higher than those on Treasury debt, some of which are tied to reliable sources of revenue (for
example, bridge and tunnel fees) and are free of state and local taxes and (2) bonds issued by foreign
countries that are in better fiscal condition than the United States. Australia, for example, has a low debt-
to-GDP ratio and abundant natural resources that can be used to fuel economic growth. Malkiel suggests
that another strategy for savers: buy a portfolio of blue-chip common stocks that offer dividends.
Sources: Matt Phillips, “Real Interest Rates: 1919–The Present,” Wall Street Journal, October 13, 2011; Burton G. Malkiel, “The
Bond Buyer’s Dilemma,” Wall Street Journal, December 7, 2011; Matt Cover, “At Current Rate of Federal Borrowing,
Government on Track to Hit Legal Limit on National Debt on March 14,” cnsnews.com, February 24, 2011; and “U.S. deficit
falls to $680 billion,” CNNMoney, October 30, 2013.
At that very moment she was Ia wa, lilo iho la keia i luahine a
transformed into an old woman make loa me kahi hulilau
wandering along the seashore kahakai, me kahi laau ohiuhiu
with a stick in her hand picking ina, wana. I loko o ka loko ia a
out sea-eggs. Kahalaokolepuupuu, he
aholehole ka ia, he nehu, he iao,
Within this fish pond owned by na ia a pau loa, me ka limu, hao
Kahalaokolepuupuu, were kept ae la ka mana o
the aholehole, 9 nehu, 10 iao, 11 Laukiamanuikahiki, pau a
and all fish of this species and panoonoo ka loko.
moss. Through the supernatural
powers of Laukiamanuikahiki all Iaia e kokolo ana me kahi hulilau
the fish in the pond disappeared, ma ke kahakai, hiki mai la na
which left the pond without a elele a Kahalaokolepuupuu, a
single fish. While she was kahea ana: “E kahi luahine, pau
crawling along the seashore two loa ka ia a ke ’lii wahine ia oe,
messengers from aihue maoli oe e na wahi
Kahalaokolepuupuu arrived and luahine.” I aku keia: “Aole na’u,
called out: “Say, you old woman, he pau kahiko no ko ka ia o keia
you have taken all the queen’s loko, o ko’u hele ana mai nei,
fish. You are a thieving old kapili oukou i pau ia’u.” I loko o
woman.” She replied: “I did not keia wa, loaa hou kekahi inoa o
take them. The fish from this ia nei, mai na elele mai, o
pond disappeared long before Lipewale, he mai no
this; but since you have seen me Kahalaokolepuupuu. Olelo mai
here you are attributing their na elele: “E pii kakou i ka hale; o
disappearance to me.” At this kou inoa, o ka inoa o ka mai o
time she was given a new name, ke ’lii wahine, o Lipewale.”
Lipewale, by the messengers.
They then said to the old A hiki lakou i ka hale, olelo aku
woman: “Let us go to the house, la na elele: “Aohe ia i koe o ka
your name, Lipewale, is that of loko, ua pau i nei wahi luahine, e
the queen’s sickness.” When they noke ana keia i ka ohiu i ka ina, i
arrived at the house, one of the ka wana.” I mai o
messengers said: “There is not a Kahalaokolepuupuu: “E kahi
single fish in the pond, all have luahine, o ka inoa o kuu mai o
been taken by this old woman. Lipewale, o kou inoa ia, ea, he ai
When we found her she was ia’u, he kapa, he hale, noho no
taking the sea-eggs.” kaua.”
Kahalaokolepuupuu then
addressed the old woman
saying: “I am going to call you
Lipewale, the name of my
ailment. You will take this name,
will you not? I will supply you
with food, clothing, house to live
in and you will live with me.”
That night when they retired, Moe iho la lakou i ka po, hele
Kahikiula approached the place mai la o Kahikiula ma kahi o
where Lipewale was sleeping Lipewale e moe nei, lele iho la
and kissed her. She then cried honi i ka ihu, kahea ae keia:
out: “Who is kissing me?” Upon “Owai keia e honi nei ia’u?”
hearing this Kahalaokolepuupuu Kahea mai o
called out: “What is it, Kahalaokolepuupuu: “E Lipewale,
Lipewale?” But she would not heaha ia?” Paa loa ko ia nei
answer. In doing this Kahikiula waha, aohe ekemu aku. Ma keia
showed that he had recognized ano kino luahine o ia nei, ua ike
his sister, Laukiamanuikahiki. mai no o Kahikiula ma na
[606] hiohiona maka, a ua maopopo
no iaia o ke kaikuahine o
Laukiamanuikahiki. [607]
At that very moment her beauty Ia wa, hoi mai la ke kino maikai
was restored to her, while the o ia nei a pili, hao mai la ke ’kua,
gods set fire to the dancing pau ka hale i ke ahi, pau ka hale
house, consuming the house, hula, pau ke kaikoeke, na mea a
her sister-in-law and all the pau i olelo ino iaia nei, pau loa i
people who had insulted her; ka make.
they all perished.
[i]
[597]
Aa, 420;
rubble lava, 104.
Ahewahewa, 560;
also killed, 564;
mamane the wood of umu for, 566.
Ahukaiolaa, 14.
Ahulumai, 14.
Aiea, 400.
Aihakoko, 25;
attendant of, killed by Piilani, 232;
mourns on the ocean and lands in Kapaahu, hence the name Kalua-o-, 232.
of Umi and Piikea, 228, 405.
Alaikaaukoko, 25.
Alakapoki, 372.
Alamihi, 378.
Alapoki, 372.
Albino, sacred, 4, 8.
or Kekea, 8.
Aloalo, 374.
Aloiloi, 100.
Asia, 40.
Companions-in-death, 150.