Chapter 13

Qualitative
Methodologies to
Understanding Research
Doris Chasokela
https://​orcid​.org/​0009​-​​0001​-​​5983​-​​8508
National University of Science and Technology, Zimbabwe

ABSTRACT
This chapter dwells into the world of qualitative methods, exploring their value
in research and providing a comprehensive overview of their various types and
applications. Qualitative methodologies are a critical component of understand-
ing research. They offer a rich and nuanced view of the phenomena under study,
providing in-​depth insights that are often unavailable through quantitative methods
alone. Qualitative methods are used in a variety of fields, including social sciences,
humanities, and even natural sciences. They allow researchers to explore complex
and often subjective phenomena such as human behaviour, culture, and social norms,
as well as emotions, experiences, and perceptions. Through this chapter, different
qualitative methodologies, including case studies, ethnography, phenomenology,
narrative analysis, and discourse analysis are explored.

INTRODUCTION

Qualitative methods offer a rich and nuanced understanding of complex phe-

nomena by examining people's experiences, perspectives, and contexts. There are
different types of qualitative instruments, such as interviews, focus groups, eth-
nography, case studies, and document analysis. Interviews are a key component of
qualitative research methods, allowing researchers to gather rich and detailed data

DOI: 10.4018/979-8-3693-6021-7.ch013

Copyright © 2025, IGI Global. Copying or distributing in print or electronic forms without written permission of IGI Global is prohibited.

321
about participants' experiences, beliefs, and perspectives. There are different types
of interviews in qualitative research, including structured, semi-​structured, and
unstructured interviews. Structured interviews use a pre-​determined set of ques-
tions, while semi-​structured interviews follow a general outline and allow for more
spontaneous conversation. Unstructured interviews are open-​ended conversations
where the researcher allows the participant to guide the discussion. Interviews have
their unique strengths and limitations. Strengths include richer data: Interviews
can provide rich and detailed data about participants' experiences, beliefs, and
perspectives. Individual Perspective: Interviews allow researchers to understand
individual differences within a larger group or population, providing insights that
might be missed in other methods. Limitations include participant bias: participants
in interviews may consciously or unconsciously present information in a way that
aligns with their self-​image or values.
Focus groups are another valuable qualitative research tool. Group Dynamics:
Focus groups involve gathering several participants (typically between 5 and 12)
to discuss a particular topic or issue. The interaction between participants and the
group dynamic can provide valuable insights into shared experiences, beliefs, and
perspectives. Facilitation: A skilled facilitator leads the discussion, ensuring that
everyone has an opportunity to contribute and that the discussion stays focused on
the topic at hand. The facilitator also plays an important role in managing group
dynamics and encouraging diverse perspectives. Focus groups also have their unique
strengths and limitations. Strengths include group dynamics: focus groups allow
researchers to observe and understand group processes and interactions, which can
be particularly useful for understanding social norms and behaviors. Efficient Data
Collection: Focus groups allow researchers to collect data from multiple partici-
pants at once, which can be more time and cost-​effective than individual interviews.
Limitations include dominant participants: some participants may be more vocal
or persuasive than others, potentially influencing the discussion or suppressing
diverse perspectives.
Ethnography is an immersive approach to qualitative research that seeks to
understand the social and cultural contexts in which human behavior occurs. Eth-
nography works on observations. Observation: ethnographic research involves direct
observation of people in their natural settings, often over a prolonged time. This
allows researchers to observe and understand the routines, practices, and cultural
norms that shape people's lives. Participant observation: In ethnography, research-
ers often participate in the daily routines and activities of the community they are
studying, which provides a deeper understanding of the culture and social dynamics.
Ethnography provides rich insights into human behavior and culture but also comes
with its own set of strengths and limitations. Strengths include cultural Immersion:
ethnography allows researchers to fully immerse themselves in the culture and daily

322
lives of the participants, providing a deep understanding of their experiences and
perspectives. Longitudinal data: ethnography often involves long-​term observation
and participation, which can provide insights into change over time. Limitations
include participant reaction: participants may alter their behavior or modify their
presentation of self when they know they are being observed.
Case studies are in-​depth investigations of a single event, person, group, or com-
munity. Case Selection: the selection of a study case is often based on factors such
as uniqueness, representativeness, or theoretical relevance. The case should provide
insight into the broader research questions or themes being investigated. Data col-
lection: case studies can involve a wide range of data collection methods, including
interviews, observation, documents and records, and other forms of data. The goal is
to build a comprehensive understanding of the case from multiple perspectives. Case
studies can provide rich and detailed data about a single phenomenon or situation,
but they also have their strengths and limitations: Strengths include rich data: case
studies allow researchers to gather a wide range of data sources, including inter-
views, observations, and documents, providing a detailed picture of the phenomenon.
Theory development: case studies can be useful in developing and testing theories,
particularly when the phenomenon is unique or not well understood. Limitations
include generalizability: because case studies focus on a single phenomenon, they
may not be generalizable to other contexts or populations.
Document analysis is a valuable method for qualitative researchers who want to
analyze texts and other artifacts to gain insights into culture, attitudes, and experi-
ences. Types of documents: document analysis can involve a wide range of written
or visual materials, including diaries, letters, interviews, newspaper articles, social
media posts, films, photographs, and more. Thematic analysis: researchers analyze
the documents to identify themes and patterns related to the research questions or
topics. This can involve coding and categorizing the data, often using qualitative
software such as NVivo. Document analysis is a valuable method for understanding
human behavior, but it also has its strengths and limitations:
Strengths include rich historical data: document analysis can provide access to
historical data and primary sources that are not available through other research
methods. Diversity of sources: documents can provide diverse perspectives on a
topic, including perspectives that may not be readily apparent in other forms of data.
Limitations embrace subjective interpretation: the interpretation of documents
can be influenced by the researcher's own biases and assumptions, which can limit
the validity of the findings.
Observations are a key component of qualitative research that allows researchers
to gain insights into human behavior in natural settings. Types of Observations:
observations can be structured or unstructured. Structured observations involve a
specific plan or protocol for observing and recording behavior. Unstructured ob-

323
servations are more open-​ended and allow the researcher to observe and note any
behavior that seems relevant to the research question. Observations are a valuable
tool for understanding human behavior, but they also have their strengths and lim-
itations. Strengths include unbiased data: observations allow researchers to collect
data without influencing the behavior of the participants, providing unbiased in-
formation about their natural behaviors. Holistic understanding: observations can
provide a more holistic understanding of human behavior by capturing nonverbal
cues, spatial relationships, and environmental factors. Limitations include obser-
vational bias: researchers may misinterpret or miss important aspects of behavior
due to their own biases or assumptions.
There are various reasons why researchers may choose to adopt qualitative
methods such as:

• Explore complex social phenomena: Qualitative methods allow researchers

to understand the complexities and nuances of social phenomena that may
not be easily captured through quantitative methods.
• Give a voice to the participants: Qualitative methods can give participants a
platform to express their experiences and perspectives, which can be particu-
larly important for marginalized or underrepresented groups.
• Challenge dominant narratives: Qualitative methods can challenge the domi-
nant or mainstream narratives of social phenomena by highlighting the expe-
riences and perspectives of those who may not be represented in other forms
of research.
• Understand the meaning of phenomena: Qualitative methods allow re-
searchers to understand the subjective meanings that participants attach to
their experiences, which can be important for understanding complex social
phenomena.
• Capture the “lived experience”: Qualitative methods can help researchers
understand how social phenomena are experienced and understood by the
people who live them, which can be important for understanding how so-
cial phenomena are shaped and influenced by social, cultural, and historical
factors.
• Generate theory from data: Qualitative methods can generate new theories or
challenge existing theories, providing a more flexible and dynamic approach
to theory-​building.
• Provide an alternative perspective: Qualitative methods can provide an alter-
native perspective to existing research and can complement other forms of
research by providing a richer understanding of social phenomena.
• Address the limitations of quantitative methods: Qualitative methods can
help address some of the limitations of quantitative methods, such as the lack

324
 of depth and detail, by providing a more nuanced and contextualized under-
standing of social phenomena.

Ethical Considerations in Qualitative Research

In qualitative research, ethical considerations are crucial to ensure that the re-
search process is conducted responsibly and respectfully. One of the primary con-
cerns is the potential for harm or exploitation to research participants, particularly
those who may be vulnerable or marginalized. Researchers must ensure that they
obtain informed consent from participants and that they are aware of the potential
risks and benefits associated with participating in the study. It is also important for
researchers to maintain confidentiality. Additionally, researchers must be mindful
of their own biases and perspectives, and take steps to minimize their impact on
the research findings. This may involve using techniques such as data triangulation,
member checking, and peer debriefing to validate and verify the data. Furthermore,
researchers must also consider the potential impact of the research on the partici-
pants and the broader community, and take steps to mitigate any potential negative
effects. For example, researchers may need to ensure that participants are not put at
risk of further harm or stigmatization as a result of their participation in the study.
Addressing ethical issues in qualitative research is essential to ensure that the
research is conducted responsibly and ethically. This involves proactively identifying
and addressing potential ethical concerns, such as the potential for harm or exploita-
tion to participants, the need to maintain confidentiality and anonymity, and the
potential for bias or contamination of the data. To address these issues, researchers
can take steps such as obtaining informed consent from participants, ensuring that
they have a clear understanding of the research purpose and methodology, and es-
tablishing protocols for data collection and storage. Additionally, researchers may
need to establish procedures for handling sensitive or confidential information,
such as data encryption or secure storage. By being proactive and transparent in
addressing these ethical issues, researchers can help to ensure that their research is
conducted responsibly and ethically and that the results are credible and trustworthy.

Potential Biases in Qualitative Research

Qualitative research is inherently subjective, and as a result, researchers can in-

troduce biases that can impact the validity and reliability of the findings. One of the
most significant biases that can arise in qualitative research is researcher bias, where
the researcher's own experiences, beliefs, and values influence the data collection
and analysis process. This can lead to a selective interpretation of the data, with
the researcher emphasizing certain findings while ignoring others. Another type of

325
bias that can occur is confirmation bias, where the researcher looks for evidence
that supports their existing theories or assumptions while ignoring or dismissing
contradictory information.
Selection bias is another potential issue in qualitative research, where the research-
er's sampling strategy or data collection methods can lead to an unrepresentative
sample of participants. This can occur when the researcher selects participants who
are already familiar with the topic or have a specific perspective, which can limit the
scope of the findings. Furthermore, interviewers may also exhibit biases, such as
asking leading questions or assuming certain characteristics about the participants.
To minimize these biases, researchers can employ various strategies. One approach
is to use triangulation techniques, such as combining multiple data sources (e.g.,
interviews, observations, and documents) and using multiple coders to analyze the
data. This can help to validate and verify the findings, reducing the risk of bias.
Additionally, researchers can take steps to increase their objectivity, such as using
open-​ended questions and avoiding assumptions about participants' characteristics.
They can also seek feedback from participants through member checking, which
involves presenting preliminary findings to participants and asking for their feedback.
Finally, researchers can engage in ongoing self-​reflection and critical evaluation of
their own biases and assumptions, recognizing that they are an integral part of the
research process. By acknowledging and addressing these biases, researchers can
increase the validity and reliability of their findings and provide a more compre-
hensive understanding of the phenomenon being studied.

Phenomenology and Study of Human Experience

Phenomenology is a qualitative research methodology that seeks to understand

human experiences in their full complexity (Gupta & Zieske, 2024; Kuchinke, 2023;
Koopman & Koopman, 2017). It focuses on the meaning and subjective experienc-
es that shape our lives and actions, rather than on abstract, objective knowledge.
In phenomenological research, the researcher aims to understand the world as it
is experienced and lived by individuals, rather than to test hypotheses or discover
universal truths. Phenomenological researchers often use in-​depth interviews or
other qualitative methods to gain a deeper understanding of the lived experiences
of their participants. Phenomenology involves reflexivity and empathy (Pandin &
Yanto, 2023; Jobling & Alberti, 2022).
Reflexivity involves being aware of and reflecting on how the researcher's own
experiences, biases, and assumptions may influence the research process. This is
particularly important in phenomenological research, where the researcher aims
to understand the experiences of others. Reflexivity is an important element of
qualitative research, particularly in the context of interpretivist and postmodernist

326
paradigms. It involves the researcher's awareness of their position and biases about
the research process and the phenomena being studied. Reflexivity acknowledges
the influence of the researcher's personal experiences, social identities, and theoret-
ical assumptions on the research process. It requires researchers to reflect on their
positionality and the way their subjectivity shapes their understanding of the data
and the phenomena being studied. (Welsh, 2024; Zhang, 2024)
Empathy is essential in phenomenological research as it allows the researcher to
empathize with and understand the participant's experiences from their perspective.
Empathy is an important skill in qualitative research, particularly when conducting
interviews or observations. It involves understanding the feelings and experiences
of the participants by putting oneself in their shoes and trying to understand their
perspectives and emotions. Empathy allows researchers to build trust and rapport
with participants, which can result in richer and more honest data. It also helps
researchers to recognize their own biases and assumptions about the participants,
allowing them to overcome potential misunderstandings or barriers to understanding.
(Brown, 2024; Mardon, 2024)
Bracketing, also known as the “epoche,” is a methodological technique used
in phenomenology to set aside pre-​existing assumptions and beliefs to understand
the lived experience of participants. According to Raza (2024) & Neubauer, et al.
(2019), assumptions are classified as identity, suspend, and focus on lived experience
assumptions. On identity assumptions, the researcher identifies their assumptions and
beliefs about the phenomenon being studied. On suspend assumptions the researcher
“brackets” or suspends these assumptions, to gain access to the lived experience of
the participants. Focus on lived experience involves the researcher focusing on the
lived experience of the participants, without imposing their assumptions or inter-
pretations on the data (Bailey & Bailey, 2021; Heredia, et al. 2024).
In phenomenology, the body is recognized as an essential part of human expe-
rience, and not just as a physical or biological entity (Ye, 2021; Fei, 2020). There
is embodied experience and the lived body. In embodied experience, the body is
understood as a way of being in the world and shapes our experience and understand-
ing of the world. The lived body is not just a physical entity, but a lived body that
is shaped by social, cultural, and historical factors. The embodiment body is not a
neutral container for experience but is actively involved in shaping our experiences
and perceptions of the world.

Ethnography and Cultural Immersion

Ethnography is a qualitative research method that involves immersing oneself in

a culture or social setting to understand its norms, beliefs, and practices. It is often
used to study communities, groups, and organizations in their natural contexts. The

327
goal of ethnographic research is to understand the meanings and lived experiences of
the people under study by observing and participating in their day-​to-​day activities
and interactions. This approach requires the researcher to adopt a non-​judgmental
and open-​minded attitude, allowing them to gain a deep understanding of the culture
and society under study.
Several other aspects of ethnography and immersion in culture, including:

• Cultural Sensitivity: Ethnographers must be sensitive to the cultural norms

and practices of the communities they are studying, avoiding any actions that
could be perceived as disrespectful or intrusive. Cultural sensitivity is a crit-
ical component of qualitative research, particularly in the context of ethno-
graphic or cross-​cultural research. It involves being aware of and respectful
of the cultural norms, values, and traditions of the participants being studied.
Cultural sensitivity requires researchers to understand the historical, politi-
cal, and social context of the participants, and to adapt their research methods
and approaches accordingly. It involves recognizing the potential power dy-
namics between the researcher and the participants and working to minimize
any potential exploitation or harm.
• Triangulation: Triangulation involves using multiple sources of data and
perspectives to gain a fuller understanding of a culture or phenomenon.
Ethnographers may use observations, interviews, and other forms of data to
cross-​check their findings and ensure the validity of their interpretations. Ways
in which researchers can use triangulation in qualitative methods to enhance
the validity and reliability of their findings: -​Data Source Triangulation: This
involves collecting data from multiple sources, such as interviews, observa-
tions, and documents, to provide a richer understanding of the phenomena
being studied. -​Methodological Triangulation: This involves using multiple
data collection methods, such as individual and focus group interviews, to
cross-​check findings and confirm or disconfirm interpretations.
• Participant observation: A method of immersing oneself in a culture or com-
munity by participating in their daily activities and routines. Participant ob-
servation involves immersing oneself in a culture or community by partici-
pating in their daily activities and routines. It involves becoming a participant
in the social world that one is studying, and observing and recording the ex-
periences, behaviours, and interactions of the members of that social world.
Participant observation can take various forms, from long-​term, immersive
ethnographic fieldwork to shorter-​term research projects. It allows research-
ers to gain a deeper understanding of the culture and community under study
by experiencing it first-​hand, rather than relying solely on interviews or other
forms of data collection.

328
• Field notes: The practice of taking detailed notes during participant observa-
tion, which can be used to document and analyse the researcher's experiences
and observations. Field notes are an essential part of participant observation,
and they serve several purposes: -​Recording observations: Field notes al-
low researchers to record their observations of the social world, including
behaviors, interactions, and patterns of activity. -​Reflecting on experiences:
Field notes provide a space for researchers to reflect on their own experiences
and reactions to the social world, including their emotions, assumptions, and
biases. -​Generating data: Field notes can be analyzed to generate data and
develop insights about the culture or community being studied.
• Insider-​outsider dynamics: The ethical and methodological challenges of
conducting ethnographic research as an outsider, particularly concerning is-
sues of power and representation. Insider-​outsider dynamics refer to the ethi-
cal and methodological challenges of conducting ethnographic research as an
outsider in a culture or community. This can involve issues of power, repre-
sentation, and insider knowledge. Insider-​outsider dynamics can pose ethical
challenges because researchers may be perceived as privileged outsiders, and
their presence may alter the social dynamics and behavior of the community
being studied. This can lead to issues of power and exploitation, as well as
difficulties in gaining the trust and cooperation of community members.

Focusing on Individual Experiences

Focusing on individual experiences is an important aspect of qualitative research,

particularly in phenomenology, narrative inquiry, and life history approaches.
These methods are concerned with understanding the world from the perspective
of the individual, rather than from a detached, objective viewpoint. By focusing on
individual experiences, researchers can gain a deeper understanding of how peo-
ple make sense of their lives, the meanings they attach to events and interactions,
and the cultural, social, and psychological influences that shape their experiences.
This focus on the individual can reveal insights that are not always apparent from
aggregate or statistical data.
Emotional Experiences: By focusing on individual experiences, researchers can
explore the emotional dimensions of people's lives, including the feelings, moods,
and attitudes that shape their experiences. Emotions are an important part of human
experience, and they can play a key role in qualitative research. Ways in which
emotions can be explored and understood through qualitative methods: -​Emotion
Work: Emotion work refers to how individuals manage or display their emotions in
different social contexts. Researchers can explore how people navigate emotions in
different settings, such as workplaces, schools, or families. -​Affective Qualitative

329
Analysis: This approach involves analyzing the affective dimensions of qualitative
data, such as tone, gestures, and facial expressions, to understand the emotional
experiences of participants.
The Role of Memory: Memories and recollections are an important part of indi-
vidual experience and can be used by researchers to understand how people construct
narratives and meanings around their experiences. Memory is an important factor
in qualitative research, particularly in methods such as life history and narrative
analysis. Memory can influence qualitative data by: -​Recall Bias: Memory is not
always accurate, and individuals may recall events differently depending on their
emotional state, experiences, or social interactions. This can introduce a degree of
bias into qualitative data. -​Collective Memory: Memory is not just an individual
phenomenon, but is also shaped by social and cultural influences. Collective mem-
ories can play a role in how individuals understand and remember events.
Life Stories: Life stories are complex and multi-​faceted, and can provide rich
insights into people's identities, values, and beliefs. Life stories are also an important
element of qualitative research, particularly in methods such as narrative analysis
and life history. Life stories can be explored in qualitative research by coherent life
narratives: many people tell stories about their lives that are coherent and make sense
in the context of their social and cultural environment. Researchers can explore these
narratives to understand how people make sense of their experiences and identities.

Ground Theory Understanding Emergent Themes

Grounded theory is an inductive research methodology that seeks to understand

complex social phenomena by identifying and analyzing the key concepts, catego-
ries, and relationships that emerge from the data. Unlike deductive research, which
begins with a hypothesis or theory and tests it against the data, grounded theory
begins with an open-​ended exploration of the data, allowing themes and categories
to emerge naturally from the data itself. In grounded theory, researchers use a pro-
cess of constant comparison to identify patterns, themes, and relationships in the
data, which are then refined and developed into a theory or conceptual framework
that is grounded in the data.
Saturation is the point at which new data stops adding new information or
themes to the research, indicating that the researcher has reached a comprehensive
understanding of the phenomenon. Saturation is a term used in qualitative research
to describe the point at which no new themes or patterns emerge in the data. It is an
important concept because it helps researchers determine when they have collected
enough data to support their findings and make generalizable claims. Saturation is
not a fixed point, and different researchers may have different definitions of what
constitutes saturation. Some researchers may consider saturation to be reached

330
when a certain number of themes have emerged or when new themes are no longer
emerging in the data.
Theoretical sensitivity refers to the researcher's ability to identify and develop
theoretical concepts and relationships from the data. Theoretical sensitivity refers
to the researcher's ability to recognize, identify, and engage with theory in qualita-
tive research. It involves being aware of the theoretical assumptions that inform the
research, as well as being sensitive to the theoretical implications of the findings.
Theoretical sensitivity is important because it helps researchers to link their findings
to broader theoretical frameworks and discussions within their field. It also enables
researchers to explore the potential implications of their findings for theory and to
contribute to theoretical development.
Coding and categorization: The process of analyzing data and identifying emergent
themes, which involves coding and categorizing the data into meaningful patterns.
Coding involves assigning labels or codes to the data, which helps to organize and
classify the data according to different themes or patterns. Codes can be descriptive,
reflecting the content of the data, or theoretical, reflecting the researcher's interpreta-
tions or theories. Categorization: Once the data has been coded, it can be categorized
into broader groups or categories, based on similarities or relationships between
the codes. Categories can help to identify broader themes or patterns in the data.
Memos are informal notes that researchers write during the coding and cate-
gorization process to capture their thoughts and ideas about the data. They serve
several purposes: -​Capturing thoughts and ideas: Memos allow researchers to
capture their thoughts and ideas about the data, including their interpretations, in-
sights, and hunches. -​Reflecting on analysis: Memos can help researchers reflect
on their analysis, evaluate their interpretations, and identify gaps or areas for further
exploration. -​Generating theory: Memos can help researchers generate and refine
their theoretical ideas, including the identification of core categories, concepts, and
theoretical propositions.
Constant comparative analysis (CCA): CCA is a key technique in grounded
theory that involves comparing data across different categories and codes to iden-
tify emergent themes and patterns. It involves: -​Data collection: The researcher
collects and analyses data, coding and categorizing it according to similarities and
differences. -​Comparison: The researcher compares codes and categories, looking
for similarities and differences, and identifying patterns in the data. -​Theoretical
sampling: Based on the patterns identified, the researcher engages in theoretical
sampling, collecting additional data to explore and refine the emerging theory.

331
Narrative Analysis Exploring Stories and Meaning-​Making

Narrative analysis is a qualitative research method that uses stories and story-
telling to understand how people make meaning of their experiences and identities.
It emphasizes the importance of narrative as a tool for self-​reflection, communica-
tion, and social interaction. In narrative analysis, researchers examine the stories
that individuals tell about their lives, their experiences, and their relationships with
others. These stories can reveal patterns and themes that reflect the individual's
worldview, values, and beliefs, as well as the social and cultural contexts in which
they are situated.
Life Course Narratives: Life course narratives are stories that people tell about
the major events and turning points in their lives. These stories can provide insights
into how individuals make sense of their past, present, and future. Life course nar-
ratives are an important tool for understanding people's experiences over the course
of their lives. They can be used to understand how people make sense of their lives,
how they negotiate social changes and transitions, and how they construct their
identities. In qualitative research, life course narratives can be explored through
methods such as life history interviews, which involve asking participants to talk
about their experiences and memories concerning their life stories. Researchers can
use these narratives to explore how people's life experiences are shaped by social,
cultural, and historical factors, and how they have adapted to and made sense of
these experiences.
Narrative Identity: Narrative identity refers to the stories that individuals tell about
themselves, which can reveal their self-​concepts, values, and goals. These stories
can also change over time, reflecting a person's life experiences and changing social
circumstances. Narrative identity refers to how people construct and understand
their identities through storytelling. In qualitative research, narrative identity can be
explored through methods such as life history interviews and narrative analysis. In
these methods, researchers can examine how participants construct and reconstruct
their identities through stories about their past experiences, their relationships, their
social identities, and their values. These stories can provide insights into the cultural
and social processes that shape identity formation, as well as how people negotiate
multiple identities and social roles.

Discourse Analysis Investigating Language and Power

Discourse analysis is a method of research that examines the role of language

in shaping social, cultural, and political relationships. It seeks to understand how
language is used to construct, maintain, or contest social identities and power re-
lations. In discourse analysis, researchers analyze how language is used in specific

332
contexts, such as in conversations, interviews, or media texts, to reveal the underlying
assumptions, values, and ideologies that are embedded in these texts. By doing so,
discourse analysts can identify how language is used to reproduce or challenge dom-
inant social hierarchies, including those based on race, gender, class, or other factors.
Critical discourse analysis is a form of discourse analysis that explicitly chal-
lenges dominant ideologies and power structures. It seeks to expose how language
is used to reinforce or legitimize social inequalities and proposes alternative ways
of speaking and understanding. Critical discourse analysis (CDA) is a qualitative
method that examines how language and discourse are used to produce, reproduce,
and challenge power relations in society. It involves analyzing the language and
discourses that are used in different social and cultural contexts, and exploring
how they shape people's understandings and experiences of the world. In CDA,
researchers look for patterns in language and discourse that reinforce or challenge
dominant social narratives, stereotypes, and power relations.
Multimodal discourse analysis examines not only the verbal language of a text but
also its visual, auditory, and other sensory aspects. Multimodal discourse analysis
(MDA) is a qualitative method that examines the multiple modes of communica-
tion, such as visual, auditory, and gestural, to understand how meaning is created
and negotiated in different social and cultural contexts. MDA takes a broad view of
communication, recognizing that meaning is not just conveyed through language,
but also other modes of expression such as images, gestures, and body language.
By examining these multiple modes of communication, researchers can gain a more
nuanced understanding of how people communicate and negotiate meaning in their
social interactions.

Hermeneutics Interpreting the Meaning

Hermeneutics is a methodological approach that is concerned with understanding

and interpreting the meaning of texts and other cultural artifacts. It is rooted in the
fields of philosophy, theology, and literary criticism, and has been widely applied in
various disciplines, including history, sociology, and psychology. In hermeneutics,
the primary goal is to understand the meaning and significance of a text or artifact
in its original context, taking into account the historical, cultural, and social factors
that shaped its production and reception.
Multiple Interpretations: Hermeneutics recognizes that there can be multiple, valid
interpretations of a text or artifact, depending on the perspective and background of
the interpreter. This recognition of multiple interpretations challenges the idea of a
single, objective truth and encourages a dialogic engagement with the text. Multiple
interpretations are an important feature of qualitative research, particularly in in-
terpretive and postmodernist paradigms. In these paradigms, researchers recognize

333
that there is no single objective or true interpretation of social phenomena, but that
meaning is constructed through social interaction and cultural context. Multiple
interpretations can be a source of richness and depth in qualitative research, as they
allow researchers to explore how different people understand and make sense of their
experiences and the world around them. They can also be a source of complexity
and uncertainty, as researchers must navigate different perspectives and negotiate
multiple understandings of phenomena.
The Role of the Reader: In hermeneutics, the reader plays a crucial role in the
process of interpretation, bringing their own experiences, beliefs, and values to bear
on the text. The role of the reader in qualitative research is an important aspect of
interpretivism, postmodernism, and other qualitative paradigms that emphasize
subjectivity and meaning-​making. In these paradigms, the reader is seen as an active
participant in the process of constructing meaning from the data. The researcher
presents their findings and interpretations to the reader, who then engages with the
text and uses their own experiences, perspectives, and knowledge to interpret and
make sense of the findings.

Interpretive Making Sense of the Social World

Interpretivism, also known as interpretive sociology, is a research paradigm that

seeks to understand human behavior and social phenomena through the meanings
and interpretations of social actors. In contrast to positivist approaches that focus
on the objective, quantifiable aspects of reality, interpretivists argue that social
reality is inherently subjective and cannot be understood through measurement or
experimentation alone. In interpretive research, the goal is to explore the meanings
that individuals ascribe to their experiences and the social world around them, which
are often shaped by culture, language, and social relationships.
Verstehen is a German term that refers to the interpretive goal of understand-
ing the subjective experience of social actors. In this view, social phenomena are
meaningful only concerning the individuals who experience them. This approach
emphasizes empathy and reflexivity, as the researcher seeks to understand the par-
ticipants' experiences from their perspective.
Symbolic Interactionism: Symbolic interactionism is a school of thought within
interpretive sociology that focuses on how individuals create meaning through their
interactions with others and with their social environment. symbolic interactionism
is a theoretical perspective in sociology that emphasizes the importance of symbols
and meaning in human interaction. It is closely related to verstehen, as it emphasizes
the role of shared meanings and understandings in shaping social interaction. In qual-
itative research, symbolic interactionism can be applied to understand the meanings
that participants attach to symbols, practices, and social structures. Researchers may

334
use methods such as participant observation and open-​ended interviews to explore
how participants make sense of their experiences and how they interact with others
in their social world.
Social constructivism is a theoretical perspective that emphasizes the role of
social interaction and cultural context in the construction of knowledge and mean-
ing. -​Reality is socially constructed: Social constructivists argue that reality is not
objective or fixed, but is socially constructed through social interaction and cultural
processes. -​Knowledge is socially constructed: Social constructivists argue that
knowledge is not a representation of an objective reality, but is shaped by social,
cultural, and historical factors.
Narrative analysis is a method of understanding human experience and identity
through stories and life histories. Key aspects of this approach include: -​Narrative
as a form of identity: Narrative analysis recognizes that people construct and under-
stand their identities through storytelling and that stories can provide a rich source
of insight into people's experiences and perceptions. -​Analysis of narrative form
and content: Narrative analysis involves analyzing the form and content of stories,
including the characters, plots, settings, and themes. This analysis can reveal the
social, cultural, and historical contexts in which stories are constructed and shared.

Benefits, Challenges, and Opportunities of Qualitative

Methodologies to Understand Research

Qualitative methodologies offer valuable insights into human behavior and social
phenomena, but they also face several challenges and opportunities in the field of
research. Some key points to consider include generalizing. Qualitative research
methods often involve in-​depth analysis of a small number of cases, which can limit
the generalizability of findings. Developing methods for sampling and triangulation
of data sources can help to address this challenge.

Benefits of Qualitative Methodologies

Qualitative methods come with a lot of benefits for researchers and their
subjects including:
• Rich, detailed data: Qualitative methods provide a lot of depth and in-
sight that can't always be captured with numbers alone. They allow you
to understand the why and how, not just the what.
• Flexibility: Qualitative methods can be tailored to the specific research
question and context, allowing for greater flexibility than more rigid,
structured approaches.

335
 • Responsiveness: Because qualitative methods are often more respon-
sive to change, researchers can adapt their approach as they learn more
about their subject, making them more adaptable than other methods.
• Contextual understanding: Qualitative methods can provide insight into
the wider social, cultural, and historical context in which a phenomenon
is occurring.
• Nuanced insights: By understanding the complexities and nuances of a
phenomenon, qualitative methods can provide a more complete picture
of the social world than other research methods.
• Empowering for participants: Qualitative methods can empower par-
ticipants to express themselves and provide their perspectives on their
experiences and social worlds.

Challenges of Qualitative Methodologies

to Understanding Research

• Subjectivity: Qualitative methods often involve the researcher's judgment

and interpretation, which can introduce bias into the research process.
Developing techniques for mitigating and acknowledging researcher bias is
critical in qualitative research.
• Validity and Reliability: Establishing validity and reliability in qualitative
research can be challenging due to the subjective nature of data collection
and analysis. Developing clear and rigorous criteria for assessing the quality
of qualitative data and findings can help to address this challenge.
• Time-​Intensive Data Analysis: Qualitative data analysis can be time-​
consuming and labor-​ intensive, especially when using approaches like
grounded theory or thematic analysis. Developing efficient and rigorous
methods for analyzing large amounts of qualitative data is essential in this
field.
• Ethical Considerations: Qualitative research often involves collecting sensi-
tive or personal information from participants, which raises ethical concerns
related to privacy, informed consent, and research ethics. Developing robust
ethical frameworks and protocols is important in qualitative research.

Opportunities of Qualitative Methodologies to Understand Research

While qualitative methodologies face several challenges, they also offer unique
opportunities for understanding research. Some of these opportunities include:

336
• Capturing Rich Data: Qualitative methods allow researchers to capture the
complexity and richness of human experience, which can be difficult to quan-
tify or measure using quantitative methods.
• Understanding Context: Qualitative research enables researchers to explore
the social and cultural contexts in which human behavior takes place, provid-
ing valuable insights into how people make sense of their experiences and the
world around them.
• Facilitating Action and Social Change: Qualitative research can provide a
voice for marginalized or underrepresented groups, facilitating the identifica-
tion of social issues and the development of interventions to address them.
• Creating New Knowledge: Qualitative research can generate new knowledge
about social phenomena and human behavior, offering valuable contributions
to the development of theory in a variety of fields, including sociology, an-
thropology, psychology, and education.
• Encouraging Collaboration: Qualitative research methods often involve col-
laborative and participatory approaches to data collection and analysis, which
can promote dialogue and collaboration between researchers and participants.
• Enhancing Methodological Rigor: Qualitative researchers are continually de-
veloping new and innovative approaches to data collection, analysis, and in-
terpretation, which can enhance the rigor and validity of qualitative research.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, qualitative methodologies offer valuable tools for understanding

complex social phenomena and human experiences. By using methods such as phe-
nomenology, narrative analysis, discourse analysis, hermeneutics, and interpretivism,
researchers can uncover the meanings, values, and worldviews that shape human
behavior and social relationships. These methodologies remind us that social reality is
not a fixed, objective entity, but a dynamic and contested construction that is shaped
by the interactions between people, culture, language, and other social factors. As
such, they offer a valuable corrective to positivist approaches that privilege objective
knowledge over subjective experiences and interpretations.

337
REFERENCES

Bailey, C., & Bailey, C. (2021). Exploring lived experience. Researching Virtual
Play Experiences: Visual Methods in Education Research, 89-​178.
Brown, C. (2024). How Can the Literature on Phenomenology Inform the Teach-
ing of Accurate Empathy in Social Work Practice? Practice, 36(1), 39–54. DOI:
10.1080/09503153.2023.2223368
Fei, D. (2020). From ‘the mind isolated with the body to ’the mind being embodied’:
Contemporary approaches to the philosophy of the body. Cultura e Scuola, 3(3),
206–219. DOI: 10.1177/2096608320960242
Gupta, N., & Zieske, C. (2024). Arts-​based phenomenological research: Theory and
praxis. Qualitative Psychology, 11(1), 95–109. DOI: 10.1037/qup0000285
Heredia, M. G., Sanchez, C. S. G., & Gonzalez, F. J. N. (2024). Integrating lived
experience: Qualitative methods for addressing energy poverty. Renewable & Sus-
tainable Energy Reviews, 189, 113917. DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2023.113917
Jobling, K., & Alberti, H. (2022). Exploring student perceptions of empathy devel-
opment during medical school–A phenomenological study. Patient Education and
Counseling, 105(12), 3515–3520. DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2022.08.015 PMID: 36064517
Koopman, O., & Koopman, O. (2017). Phenomenology as a method in education
research. Science education and curriculum in South Africa, 1-​24.
Kuchinke, K. P. (2023). Phenomenology and human resource development: Philo-
sophical foundations and implication for research. Human Resource Development
Review, 22(1), 36–58. DOI: 10.1177/15344843221139352
Mardon, G. (2024). Dis-​jointed time: A Husserlian phenomenology of the shared
world (Doctoral dissertation, University of Tasmania).
Neubauer, B. E., Witkop, C. T., & Varpio, L. (2019). How phenomenology can help
us learn from the experiences of others. Perspectives on Medical Education, 8(2),
90–97. DOI: 10.1007/S40037-​019-​0509-​2 PMID: 30953335
Pandin, M. G. R., & Yanto, E. S. (2023). The what and how of existential-​phenomeno-
logical research. The Qualitative Report, 28(3), 816–827. DOI: 10.46743/2160-​
3715/2023.6268
Raza, S. (2024). On the Uses of Phenomenology in Sociological Research: A Ty-
pology, some Criticisms, and a Plea. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour,
54(2), 185–215. DOI: 10.1111/jtsb.12415

338
Welsh, S. (2024). Reflections on first sociology learnings: The phenomenology of
sociology. Reflective Practice, 25(1), 1–10. DOI: 10.1080/14623943.2022.2148241
Ye, H. (2021). The educational value of the body: A perspective of phenomenology.
Educational Research in China: Articles from Educational Research, 177-​192.
Zhang, N. (2024). Toward a Phenomenological Understanding of Internet-​Mediated
Meme-​ing as a Lived Experience in Social Distancing via Auto Ethnography. Journal
of Contemporary Ethnography, 53(2), 181–211. DOI: 10.1177/08912416231216980

KEY TERMS AND DEFINITIONS

Case Study: This is a form of research that examines an individual, a group, or

an event in-​depth. It involves collecting and analyzing data from a single or limited
number of subjects to understand a phenomenon.
Discourse Analysis: Is a qualitative research method that examines the language
used in social interactions and texts to understand how meaning is constructed,
negotiated, and contested in specific social, cultural, and political contexts.
Ethnography: Is a qualitative research method that involves immersive and
prolonged observation and participation in a particular cultural setting or community.
Grounded Theory: Is a qualitative research method that involves the systematic
analysis of data to generate a theory that is grounded in the lived experiences and
actions of the participants.
Hermeneutics: Is a philosophical approach that seeks to understand and inter-
pret text, actions, and social phenomena by considering their historical, cultural,
and linguistic context.
Interpretivism: Is a theoretical perspective that emphasizes the importance of
understanding the meanings and interpretations that individuals and groups ascribe
to their experiences, social actions, and the world around them.
Narrative Analysis: Is a qualitative research method that examines the stories
and personal accounts of individuals and groups to understand their experiences,
perspectives, and cultural contexts.
Phenomenology: Is a philosophical and research approach that seeks to under-
stand the world from the perspective of lived experience, focusing on the meanings,
structures, and consciousness of human experience.
Postmodernism: Is a broad philosophical movement that emerged in the late
20th century as a reaction to the Enlightenment-​era belief in objective knowledge,
truth, and progress.

339
 Qualitative Data Analysis: Is the process of examining, interpreting, and making
sense of qualitative data collected through methods such as interviews, observations,
focus groups, and document analysis.
Qualitative Methods: Refers to a diverse range of research approaches that seek
to understand human experiences, behaviors, and social phenomena.

340