Introduction to Corsi Block Task

The Corsi Block Test (CBT) is a well-established neuropsychological tool for evaluating

visuospatial working memory and spatial attention (Kessels et al., 2000). Created by

neuropsychologist Philip Michael Corsi in 1972, it has become a standard in assessing spatial

memory capabilities across clinical and research contexts. The CBT, available on the PEBL

(Psychology Experiment Building Language) platform, provides an open-source, digital format

that enhances the reliability and accessibility of visuospatial working memory assessments. This

digital adaptation has extended CBT’s usability, making it a valuable resource for clinicians and

researchers alike, especially those in cognitive psychology and neuroscience.

The CBT consists of nine blocks, which are highlighted in various sequences that the participant

must reproduce by tapping in the same order. As the task progresses, the sequences lengthen,

requiring increased memory capacity and attention. The longest sequence a person can

accurately repeat is often used as a measure of their visuospatial working memory (Berch et al.,

1998). This introduction will examine the CBT’s significance, its use within the PEBL platform,

and the neuroscientific foundations that support spatial memory assessments.

Applications

The Corsi Block Test is widely utilized in clinical psychology, neuropsychology, and

neuroscience research. Clinically, it aids in evaluating cognitive impairments related to

conditions such as Alzheimer’s disease, traumatic brain injury (TBI), and other

neurodegenerative disorders (Pillon et al., 1991). For example, reduced CBT performance is

commonly seen in Alzheimer’s patients, serving as an indicator of spatial memory impairment

associated with disease progression (Sahakian & Owen, 1992). It is also frequently applied in

research investigating TBI's impact on working memory, with studies showing that individuals

with brain injuries often experience marked declines in visuospatial memory and attention

(Wilde et al., 2006).

Beyond clinical applications, the CBT is used in cognitive neuroscience research to explore the

neural underpinnings of spatial and working memory (Smith et al., 2014). It is commonly

included in studies of age-related cognitive decline, as performance tends to decrease with age,

reflecting changes in brain regions associated with memory (Myerson et al., 2003). Moreover,

the CBT has proven valuable in developmental research on children and adolescents, where it

provides insight into the maturation of spatial memory and attention across developmental stages

(Piccardi et al., 2008).

Neuroscience of Corsi Block Test

The neurobiological mechanisms underlying CBT performance involve the hippocampus and

parietal cortex, which are integral to spatial and working memory processes (Astur et al., 2002).

The posterior hippocampus is particularly important for encoding and retrieving spatial

information, playing a key role in spatial memory tasks like the CBT (Burgess et al., 2002).

Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies have shown a positive correlation

between hippocampal activation and performance on visuospatial memory tasks, including the

CBT (Hartley et al., 2003).

The right posterior parietal cortex is also highly active during CBT, as it is essential for spatial

attention and coordinating motor responses (Simon et al., 2002). This area works in concert with

the hippocampus to facilitate encoding, maintaining, and replicating spatial sequences. Poor CBT
performance in individuals with lesions in these regions highlights their importance in spatial

working memory and reinforces CBT’s utility as a cognitive assessment tool (Berch et al., 1998).

Conclusion

The Corsi Block Test, particularly in its PEBL adaptation, is a validated and widely respected

instrument for assessing visuospatial working memory. Its extensive use across clinical and

research settings demonstrates its versatility in measuring cognitive abilities such as spatial

attention and memory. The test’s sensitivity to neural processes in the hippocampus and parietal

cortex underscores its utility in assessing spatial memory. Overall, the CBT remains an

accessible and essential tool for investigating the intricacies of human attention and memory

through the PEBL platform.

 REFERENCES

● Astur, R. S., Ortiz, M. L., & Sutherland, R. J. (2002). A characterization of performance

by men and women in a virtual Morris water task: A large and reliable sex difference.

Behavioral Brain Research, 93(1-2), 185-190.

● Berch, D. B., Krikorian, R., & Huha, E. M. (1998). The Corsi Block-Tapping Task:

Methodological and theoretical considerations. Brain and Cognition, 38(3), 317-338.

● Burgess, N., Maguire, E. A., & O'Keefe, J. (2002). The human hippocampus and spatial

and episodic memory. Neuron, 35(4), 625-641.

● Hartley, T., Maguire, E. A., Spiers, H. J., & Burgess, N. (2003). The well-worn route and

the path less traveled: Distinct neural bases of route following and wayfinding in humans.

Neuron, 37(5), 877-888.

● Kessels, R. P., van Zandvoort, M. J., Postma, A., Kappelle, L. J., & de Haan, E. H.

(2000). The Corsi Block-Tapping Task: Standardization and normative data. Applied

Neuropsychology, 7(4), 252-258.

● Mueller, S. T., & Piper, B. J. (2014). The Psychology Experiment Building Language

(PEBL) and PEBL Test Battery. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 222, 250-259.

● Myerson, J., Emery, L., White, D. A., & Hale, S. (2003). Effects of age, domain, and

processing demands on memory span: Evidence for differential decline. Aging,

Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 10(1), 20-27.

● Pillon, B., Dubois, B., Ploska, A., & Agid, Y. (1991). Severity and specificity of

cognitive impairment in Alzheimer's, Huntington's, and Parkinson's diseases and

progressive supranuclear palsy. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry,

54(10), 936-941.
● Piccardi, L., Bianchini, F., Iasevoli, L., Giannone, G., Guariglia, C., & Palmiero, M.

(2008). Visuospatial memory in congenital blindness: A compensatory role of auditory

representations. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 102(9), 546-554.

● Raz, N., Lindenberger, U., Rodrigue, K. M., Kennedy, K. M., Head, D., Williamson, A.,

& Acker, J. D. (2005). Regional brain changes in aging healthy adults: General trends,

individual differences and modifiers. Cerebral Cortex, 15(11), 1676-1689.

● Sahakian, B. J., & Owen, A. M. (1992). Computerized assessment in neuropsychiatry

using CANTAB: Discussion paper. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 85(7), 399-

402.

● Simon, O., Mangin, J. F., Cohen, L., Le Bihan, D., & Dehaene, S. (2002). Topographical

layout of hand, eye, calculation, and language-related areas in the human parietal lobe.

Neuron, 33(3), 475-487.

● Smith, E. E., & Jonides, J. (1997). Working memory: A view from neuroimaging.

Cognitive Psychology, 33(1), 5-42