R22TB015 - Mini Project
R22TB015 - Mini Project
A Project Report On
MASTERS OF TECHNOLOGY
IN
CIVIL ENGINEERING
SEP 2023
www.reva.edu.in
SCHOOL OF CIVIL ENGINEERING
A Project Report on
MASTERS OF TECHNOLOGY
IN
CIVIL ENGINEERING
Submitted By
SEPT 2023
CERTIFICATE
Certified that the Project work entitled “Cost Analysis, Design,
Modeling, and Visualization of G+3 and G+4 Buildings in Virtual
Reality using a Set of Civil Engineering Software”
carried out by SHAIK ABDUL RASHEED (R22TB015) during the academic year 2021-22, have
submitted the Project report in partial fulfillment for the award of Master of Technology in Civil
Engineering during the academic year 2022-23. The Project report has been approved as it satisfies the
academic requirements in respect of Project work prescribed for the said degree.
EXAMINERS
I am student of M.Tech in Civil Engineering, REVA Univeresity, declare that this dissertation work
entitled “Cost Analysis, Modeling, and Visualization of G+3 and G+4 Buildings in Virtual Reality
using a set of Civil Engineering Software”
is the result of dissertation work done under the supervision of Prof. Sanjaya Raj A, School of
Civil Engineering, REVA University, Bengaluru.
I am submitting this Dissertation in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the award of the
degree of Master of Technology in Civil Engineering by the REVA University, Bangalore during
the academic year 2022-23.
I am further declare that this dissertation report or any part of it has not been submitted for the award
of any other Degree/ Diploma of this University or any other University/ Institution.
Certified that this Dissertation work submitted has been carried out under our guidance and the
declaration made by the candidate is true to the best of our knowledge.
Date: Date:
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
The satisfaction and euphoria that accompany the successful completion of any task would be
incomplete without mentioning the people who helped it making it possible whose constant
guidance and encouragement crowned our effort with success.
We take this opportunity to thank Dr. P. SHYAMA RAJU, Chancellor of REVA University
for providing us with all the facilities that lead to the successful completion of our project.
We wish to place on record our thanks to Mrs. Bhavana B, Director, School of Civil Engineering,
REVA University, Bengaluru for providing encouragement and valuable suggestions.
We would like to thank Mr. Sanjay Raj A, Professor, School of Civil Engineering, andP all the
teaching and non-teaching staff, School of Civil Engineering for periodic inspection, time to time
evaluation, and helping us with proper guidelines, encouragement, and valuable suggestions to
carry out this project work.
ABSTRACT
In recent years, rapid growth in technology is reshaping the world but Civil Engineering cost
estimates, drafting and modeling of structural models are still confined to charts and mini-
drafters. Nevertheless, with immersive technology design, designers, engineers, and builders can
mold CAD drawing into Virtual Reality, Augmented Reality, and Mixed Reality which not only
reduces the complexity of understanding data but also aids in achieving cost regulation of
structures consequently increases sustainable development in construction and environmental
safety.
The objective of this research work is to prove that employing a small set of Civil
Engineering software not only makes works simple and easy but also increases the
efficiency in planning, analysis, designing, and modeling of any structure. On the whole,
this thesis contemplates a G+4 and G+3 buildings and maneuvers between a set of
universally accepted Civil Engineering software such as AutoCAD, Revit Architecture,
STAAD.Pro, ETABS, M.S. Project and Enscape to draft plan using Indian Standard
structural by-laws, Model the exterior and interior structural elements, Analyze, Design,
Examine Cost of G+4 and G+3 buildings while visualizing the same in Virtual Reality
respectively. On the flip side, STAAD.Pro analysis and designs were compared with
ETABS designs forged using Indian Standard Codes to secure a conclusion that evincing
and endorsing the finest among both the computerized analysis and design of the building.
In addition to that, economic estimation, project scheduling, and workflow were affirmed
based on Standard Schedule of rates and the latest market price of labor and material as of
today.
Keywords: AutoCAD, Revit Architecture, Enscape, STAAD.Pro, ETABS, Virtual Reality,
Cost Estimation, MS Project, Construction Work flow, Project Management, Interior
Modeling, Exterior Modeling, Manual Design of RCCS members.
iv
CONTENTS
REVA/CE/2022-2024 v
3.4 MODELLING IN REVIT ARCHITECTURE 32
3.4.1 Model Generation 32
3.4.2 Elevation and 3D Views 36
3.4.3 Site Provision 38
3.5 VISUALIZATION IN VIRTUAL REALITY 38
3.5.1 Rendering Software/ Plug-ins 39
3.5.2 Why Enscape 39
3.5.3 VR in Enscape 39
3.6 MS PROJECT 41
3.7 ESTIMATION 53
4. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 65
4.1 DESIGN RESULTS 65
4.1.1 Shear Force Diagram 65
4.1.2 Bending Moment Diagram 67
4.1.3 Displacement Diagram 69
4.2 DESIGN COMPARISON 71
4.2.1 Comparison of Conventional and Hybrid Structu res 71
4.2.2 STAAD.Pro and ETABS Comparison 74
4.3 COST COMPARISON 75
4.3.1 Duplex and G+3 Building Comparison 75
4.3.2 SSR Based Estimation Vs MS Project Generated Esti tion 75
5. CONCLUSION 77
REFERENCES 79
APPENDIXES 1
APPENDIX-1 STAAD.Pro Program Code G+3 1
APPENDIX-2 STAAD.Pro Program Code Duplex 5
REVA/CE/2022-2024 vi
LIST OF FIGURES
REVA/CE/2022-2024 vii
3.45 Duplex 1st floor 2D model in Revit Architecture 34
3.46 Duplex 2nd floor 2D model in Revit Architecture 35
3.47 Project Browser 35
3.48 Properties Tab 35
3.49 Ribbon Tools 36
3.50 Path to create extrusions 36
3.51 G+3 Residential Building Elevation 36
3.52 Duplex Elevation 37
3.53 Rendered 3D view of G+3 Residential building 37
3.54 Rendered view of Duplex Building 38
3.55 Massing and Site window 38
3.56 Highlighted VR Headset icon at top right corner 40
3.57 Highlighted Mono Panorama icon 40
3.58 Highlighted Video Editor icon 41
4.1 Shear Force Diagram of G+3 building in STAAD.Pro
by applying load combinations 65
4.2 Shear Force Diagram of Duplex building in STAAD.Pro
by applying load combinations 66
4.3 Bending Moment Diagram of G+3 building in
STAAD.Pro by applying load combinations 67
4.4 Bending Moment Diagram of Duplex building in
STAAD.Pro by applying load combinations 68
4.5 Displacement Diagram of G+3 building in STAAD.Pro
by applying load combinations 69
4.6 Displacement Diagram of Duplex building in
STAAD.Pro by applying load combinations 70
4.7 SFD for single frame of Conventional Structure 71
4.8 SFD for single frame of Hybrid Structure 71
4.9 BMD for single frame of Conventional Structure 72
4.10 SFD for single frame of Hybrid Structure 72
4.11 Displacement for single frame of Conventional 73
Structure
4.12 Displacement for single frame of Hybrid Structure 73
REVA/CE/2022-2024 viii
LIST OF TABLES
REVA/CE/2022-2024 ix
Cost Analysis, Design, Modeling, and Visualization of G+3 and G+4 Buildings in
Virtual Reality using a Set of Civil Engineering Software
. CHAPTER -1
INTRODUCTION
1.1 INTRODUCTION
Structural design of buildings for different loads is primarily concerned with structural
safety during major ground motions, but serviceability and the potential for economic loss
are also of concern. In recent years, rapid growth in technology is reshaping the world but
Civil Engineering cost estimates, drafting and modeling of structural models are still
confined to charts and mini drafters. Nevertheless, with immersive technology design,
designers, engineers, and builders can mold CAD drawing into Virtual Reality, Augmented
Reality, and Mixed Reality which not only reduces the complexity of understanding data
but also aids in achieving cost regulation of structures consequently increases sustainable
development in construction and environmental safety.
The layout of the proposed G+3, G+4 individual buildings are based on a Plot size
of 30’x 50’ is drafted in the AutoCAD. The Analysis and Design of the entire structure has
been completed using STAAD.Pro. The design includes the various forces (seismic load,
dead load, live load, wind load) acting on the various members as well. On the other side
STAAD.Pro analysis and designs were compared with ETABS designs forged using Indian
Standard Codes to secure a conclusion that evincing and endorsing the finest among both
manual and computerized analysis and design of the building. The foundation has been
designed using soil conditions replicating the site location as Tirupati. Simultaneously, this
plan is modelled in the Revit Architecture.
Microsoft Project has been used for planning and estimating the various activities
that surround the construction of a building. Using Microsoft Project, we were able to
formulate a working schedule and progress bar for constant monitoring of the project. By
using Microsoft project, we were able to assign various resources aswell as responsibilities
on various people related to various stages of the project thereby increasing accountability.
The duration of the project has been calculated using Microsoft Project. The progress and
relationship between various activities has also shown in the form of an animated Gantt
chart. This chart also helps the project manager to explain to his clients the various aspects
as well as the progress of the project. The cost estimation of the building is estimated
manually by considering Standard Schedule of Rates (SSR).
REVA/CE/2022-2024 1
Cost Analysis, Design, Modeling, and Visualization of G+3 and G+4 Buildings in
Virtual Reality using a Set of Civil Engineering Software
The plan was drafted in the Unity using Indian Standard structural by-laws, Model
the exterior and interior structural elements, Analyze, Design, Examine G+4 and G+3
buildings while visualizing the same in Virtual Reality respectively.
1.2 SOFTWARE USED
1.2.1 AutoCAD
AutoCAD is a commercial computer aided design and drafting software application.
Developed by Autodesk and was first released in December 1983 as a desktop app on
microcomputers with internal graphics controllers. Before introduction of AutoCAD
commercial CAD drawings are ran on mainframe computers or minicomputers, with each
operator working at a separate graphics terminal.
1.2.2 STAAD.Pro
STAAD.Pro is a structural analysis and design software application originally developed
by Research Engineers International in 1997. In late 2005, Research Engineers
International was bought by Bentley Systems. STAAD.Pro is one of the most widely
used structural analysis and design software products worldwide. It supports over 90
international steel, concrete, timber & aluminum design codes. It canmake use of various
forms of analysis from the traditional static analysis to morerecent analysis methods like
p-delta analysis, geometric non-linear analysis, Pushover analysis (Static-Non-Linear
Analysis) or a buckling analysis. It can also make use of various forms of dynamic
analysis methods from time history analysis to responsespectrum analysis. The response
spectrum analysis feature is supported for both userdefined spectra as well as a number
of international code specified spectra. Additionally, STAAD.Pro is interoperable with
applications such as RAM Connection, AutoPIPE, SACS and many more engineering
design and analysis applications to further improve collaboration between the different
disciplines involved in a project. STAAD can be used for analysis and design of all
types ofstructural projects from plants, buildings, and bridges to towers, tunnels, metro
stations, water/waste water treatment plants and more.
1.2.3 ETABS
ETABS- Extended 3D Analysis of Building Systems is a product of CSI (Computers and
Structures Inc). It is an engineering software that is used in construction. It has efficient
structure analysis and design programs developed for catering to multi-story building
systems. It is loaded with an integrated system consisting of modelling tools
REVA/CE/2022-2024 2
Cost Analysis, Design, Modeling, and Visualization of G+3 and G+4 Buildings in
Virtual Reality using a Set of Civil Engineering Software
and templated, code-based load prescriptions, analysis methods and solutiontechniques. It
can handle the largest and most complex building models and
associated configurations. ETABS software is embedded with CAD-like drawingtools with
an object-based interface and grid representation.
For nearly 30 years ETABS software has been recognized worldwide as the
industry-standard software for the design and analysis of buildings.
1.2.4 Revit Architecture
Revit Architecture is a building information modelling software for architects, landscape
architects, structural engineers, mechanical, electrical, and plumbing (MEP) engineers,
designers and contractors. The original software was developed by Charles River Software,
founded in 1997, renamed Revit Technology Corporation in 2000, and acquired by
Autodesk in 2002. The software allows users to design a building and structure and its
components in 3D, annotate the model with 2D drafting elements, and access building
information from the building model's database. Revit is 4D building information
modeling capable with tools to plan and track various stages in the building's life cycle,
from concept to construction and later maintenance and/or demolition.
1.2.5 MS Project
Microsoft Project is a project management software product, developed by Microsoft. It is
designed to assist a project manager in developing a schedule, assigning resources to tasks,
tracking progress, managing the budget and analyzing workloads. It has become dominant
PC based project management software. It is a part of the Microsoft Office family but has
never been included in any of the office suites. It is currently available in two editions,
Standard and professional. It is an EPM (Enterprise Project Management) product.
1.2.6 Enscape
Enscape is a commercial real-time rendering and Virtual Reality plugin. It is mainly used in
the architecture and construction fields and is developed and maintained by Enscape
GmbH, founded in 2013 and based in Karlsruhe, Germany with a n office in New York,
USA.
Enscape has a BIM information plane that opens within the Enscape window itself
and allows easy selection and inspection of all the BIM information within a project. This
Plug-in feature is now available in the full version of Enscape for Revit and ArchiCAD. All
BIM information are listed and categorized according to how it was entered in the
CAD. The information is not editable in Enscape window anyalterations required are to
be performed within the CAD Software that we are using with Enscape.
REVA/CE/2022-2024 3
Cost Analysis, Design, Modeling, and Visualization of G+3 and G+4 Buildings in
Virtual Reality using a Set of Civil Engineering Software
. CHAPTER-2
LITERATURE SURVEY
Bahador. B. et al., (2012) observed the displacement obtained by static analysis are higher
than the dynamic analysis. Static analysis is not sufficient for high rise building and it is
necessary to provide dynamic analysis.
Rasikan. A, Rajendran. M.G (2013) presented the study and comparison of the difference
of wind behavior of the buildings with and without Shear Walls. It is concluded that
displacement for a 15-storey building with shear wall is 20.18% less than the 15-storey
building without a shear wall and displacement for a 20-storey building with shear wall is
14.6% less than the 20-storey building without a shearwall.
Raju. K.R. et al., (2013) adopted Limit State Method of analysis and design, 3B+G+40
story reinforced concrete high-rise building under wind and seismic loads were analyzed
using STAAD.Pro and concluded that wind and earthquake sensitive and the roof
displacement and inter-story drifts due to wind and earthquake exceeding the limits
prescribed, involve an increase in structural material to resist lateral loads in high rise
buildings.
Sharma. M, Maru. S (2014) results obtained by the dynamic analysis are higher than the
results obtained by the static analysis for the same points and conditions.
Thakur. A, Singh. A (2014) concluded that the building with shear wall at corner is more
efficient than all other types of shear wall.
Harne. V.R (2014) lateral deflection of column for building with Shear walls at corner is
reduced as compared other patterns.
Mahesh. S, Rao. B.P (2014) on comparing both STAAD.Pro and ETABS software
STAAD.Pro gives more values for reinforcement percentage.
Sulthan. MR, Peera. D.G (2015) Buildings with irregularity is vulnerable to earthquake
damages.
Soni. P. et al., (2016) It concludes that structure with shear wall is generated less values of
von- misses stress and deformation.
Kulkarni. T. et al., (2016) Top beam requires more reinforcement in Static Load
Combination compared to that of Dynamic Load Combination. Lower beam requires
REVA/CE/2022-2024 4
Cost Analysis, Design, Modeling, and Visualization of G+3 and G+4 Buildings in
Virtual Reality using a Set of Civil Engineering Software
REVA/CE/2022-2024 5
Cost Analysis, Design, Modeling, and Visualization of G+3 and G+4 Buildings in
Virtual Reality using a Set of Civil Engineering Software
installation. Revit architecture will give clear picture of building, excellent visualization
by using V-Ray software that is made for rendering purpose.
Kavya. HK (2020) The design of the residential building is done by manually,STAAD.Pro
and ETABS. The comparison between STAAD.Pro, ETABS and manual design,
reinforcement required is uneconomical in STAAD.Pro when compared with ETABS and
manual designs.
Agashe. R (2020) Comparison of manual calculation and STAAD.Pro software analysis is
same, but design is different using STAAD analysis and design of multi storey buildings
has completed quickly and easier than manual calculation.
Surendra. K (2020) STAAD.Pro and ETABS software’s gives almost same result. These
are the perfect software adopted for analysis. Usage of STAAD.Pro and ETABS software’s
minimizes the time required for analysis and design.
REVA/CE/2022-2024 6
Cost Analysis, Design, Modeling, and Visualization of G+3 and G+4 Buildings in
Virtual Reality using a Set of Civil Engineering Software
. CHAPTER-3
METHODOLOGY
3.1 AutoCAD PLANNING
It is the basic requirement for a Civil Engineer to provide options to his clients. In general
consultancies provide two or more different plans for provided site. So, we Civil Engineers
have to fulfil their requirement within budget constraints.
Plans are prepared by following Andhra Pradesh building Bye-Laws
G.O.Ms.No.119. Providing proper setbacks, spacious parking at ground floor and good
amount of ventilation to the building users. By-layer properties for the AutoCAD Drawings
are also taken from the Andhra Pradesh Building Bye-Laws. Building plans are to
accommodate 4-6 person in the given 30’*50’ land. Allowing setbacks 26’*36’ is
considered as the built-up/ plinth area.
Figures 3.1, 3.2, 3.3 represents building plans for G+3 and Duplex buildings.
Figures 3.4, 3.5, 3.6 represent the electrical layouts for 3.1, 3.2, 3.3 respectively.
Figures 3.7, 3.8, 3.9 represents the plumbing layouts for 3.1, 3.2, 3.3 respectively.
REVA/CE/2022-2024 7
Cost Analysis, Design, Modeling, and Visualization of G+3 and G+4 Buildings in
Virtual Reality using a Set of Civil Engineering Software
REVA/CE/2022-2024 8
Cost Analysis, Design, Modeling, and Visualization of G+3 and G+4 Buildings in
Virtual Reality using a Set of Civil Engineering Software
REVA/CE/2022-2024 9
Cost Analysis, Design, Modeling, and Visualization of G+3 and G+4 Buildings in
Virtual Reality using a Set of Civil Engineering Software
REVA/CE/2022-2024 10
Cost Analysis, Design, Modeling, and Visualization of G+3 and G+4 Buildings in
Virtual Reality using a Set of Civil Engineering Software
NOTE: Green lines represents pipes carrying fresh water from tank. Brown lines
represents waste water carrying pipes.
REVA/CE/2022-2024 11
Cost Analysis, Design, Modeling, and Visualization of G+3 and G+4 Buildings in
Virtual Reality using a Set of Civil Engineering Software
Analysis and Design is carried for both conventional and hybrid structures (Shear Wall).
Conventional Structure:
It is a framed structure designed with columns and beams as structural elements. This is a
traditional method of construction and the construction knowledge is passed from one
generation to other using reinforced cement concrete with columns, beams and slabs. In the
conventional framed structure though the brick masonry is not designed to counter the
gravity or seismic loads, they behave as shock absorbers to a certain extent and facilitate un
energy dissipation during seismic activities as well as contributes for strength of the
structure under gravity loads up to some extent.
Hybrid Structure:
This structure is a combination of framed and shear wall structure. This includes structural
elements of columns and beams with shear wall panels at places to provide required
stiffness to the structure. In this system RCC frames like columns and beams are braced
with reinforced concrete walls. The main reason for bracing a shear wall with reinforced
concrete frames are to counter the effects of lateral loads (wind or earthquake) acting on the
structure.
For the Hybrid structures Shear Walls are installed in three different ways
1. At the Corners as L-Shaped Walls
2. Along some portion of the Periphery
3. At the center as Cross type Shear Wall
Fig. 3.10. L-Shaped Shear Wall Fig. 3.11. Shear Wall at Periphery
REVA/CE/2022-2024 12
Cost Analysis, Design, Modeling, and Visualization of G+3 and G+4 Buildings in
Virtual Reality using a Set of Civil Engineering Software
REVA/CE/2022-2024 13
Cost Analysis, Design, Modeling, and Visualization of G+3 and G+4 Buildings in
Virtual Reality using a Set of Civil Engineering Software
REVA/CE/2022-2024 14
Cost Analysis, Design, Modeling, and Visualization of G+3 and G+4 Buildings in
Virtual Reality using a Set of Civil Engineering Software
Figures 3.13, 3.14, 3.15 represents the STAAD.Pro models for G+3 Conventional, Duplex
(G+4) and G+3 Hybrid structures.
For generating a RCC model in STAAD.Pro open the structure wizard and create a bay
frame of required dimensions providing required column alignment. Then providegeometry
for all the members of the structure from General→Properties→Define beam and column
dimensions as well as slab thickness and plate thickness (only for Hybrid Structure). Assign
the properties for the designated members. Generated model is shown as figure 3.16.
REVA/CE/2022-2024 15
Cost Analysis, Design, Modeling, and Visualization of G+3 and G+4 Buildings in
Virtual Reality using a Set of Civil Engineering Software
At the next step provide supports at the base of the structure. Create the fixed type
of support from General→Supports→Create→Fixed Support and assign the supports at
required base nodes. Figure 3.17 shows the structure assigned with fixed supports.
Firstly, we have to provide the Seismic definition as the primary loading condition forany
structure. Despite doing that STAAD.Pro error is obtained. Seismic loads are included
following Indian Standard codes IS 1893 – 2002. The seismic parameters to be included are
as generated based on the zone that the structure is to be constructed, type of structure and
soil. Seismic load generation is shown in figure 3.18.
REVA/CE/2022-2024 16
Cost Analysis, Design, Modeling, and Visualization of G+3 and G+4 Buildings in
Virtual Reality using a Set of Civil Engineering Software
REVA/CE/2022-2024 17
Cost Analysis, Design, Modeling, and Visualization of G+3 and G+4 Buildings in
Virtual Reality using a Set of Civil Engineering Software
. Then provide the wind load definition for the structures exceeding the height of
10m. Structures that we provided are above 10m say G+3 building is 12.2m and
G+4 Duplex building is 15.24m respectively. Wind load calculations are unique for each
building based on its dimensions. They are calculated using Indian Standard Code IS
875 – Part 3. Building height, life span, design wind speed, number of columns, wind
pressure, wind load are key aspects in defining the wind load for a structure. Wind load
intensities for the designed structure is shown in figure 3.20.
Fig. 3.20. Wind Load definition and Intensities of wind on cumulative heights
Also provide dead load and live load for the structure which includes the self-
weight of the structure, exterior and interior wall loads and load combinations.
Load combinations are Auto-Generated in STAAD.Pro with the type of load that we
have provided. 17 load combinations are generated for the provided seismic, wind, dead and
live loads. Load combinations are included as similar to addition of a load case like seismic,
wind, dead or live load. Load combination category is includedas General Structures.
REVA/CE/2022-2024 18
Cost Analysis, Design, Modeling, and Visualization of G+3 and G+4 Buildings in
Virtual Reality using a Set of Civil Engineering Software
For designing a structure in STAAD.Pro we can select and define few parameters like
Compressive Strength of the Concrete, Yield Strength of the Steel Reinforcement,
Maximum and Minimum Sizes of Main and Secondary Reinforcement to be used etc.
Heading with the commands design beam, design column, design element and takeoff
we can get the complete details of the concrete and the reinforcement. STAAD.Pro
provides the best possible design for a structure with in limited period of time and great
accuracy. Concrete take-off provides the total concrete required for the structure to be
constructed.
REVA/CE/2022-2024 19
Cost Analysis, Design, Modeling, and Visualization of G+3 and G+4 Buildings in
Virtual Reality using a Set of Civil Engineering Software
After successful completion of Concrete Frame Design, footing design is carried out in
STAAD.foundation including all the load cases considered in the present project as shown
in figure 3.23 and Run STAAD.foundation.
REVA/CE/2022-2024 20
Cost Analysis, Design, Modeling, and Visualization of G+3 and G+4 Buildings in
Virtual Reality using a Set of Civil Engineering Software
ETABS is a universally accepted analysis and design software. The convincing point to
work on ETABS is that, it provides 3d and 2d visualization simultaneously at same screen
at an instance as shown in figures 3.28 and 3.29.
REVA/CE/2022-2024 21
Cost Analysis, Design, Modeling, and Visualization of G+3 and G+4 Buildings in
Virtual Reality using a Set of Civil Engineering Software
Clicking on New model a model initialization dialogue box appears as figure 3.26. Here we
use Built-in settings to set the project with Indian Standard codes and Metric units.
On the next step, different templates are obtained for providing structural
dimensions. We mostly prefer the grid only using custom grid spacing shown in figure
3.27 to provide structural dimension s for regular structures.
REVA/CE/2022-2024 22
Cost Analysis, Design, Modeling, and Visualization of G+3 and G+4 Buildings in
Virtual Reality using a Set of Civil Engineering Software
. With this feature, ununiform grid lines are spaced in ordinates system or
spacing system for both plan and story.
Select define in the tool bar and click on material properties. Add new materials as M25 for
concrete and HYSD415 for Fe415 steel. Clicking on modify/show material set the required
parameters for the particular material.
REVA/CE/2022-2024 23
Cost Analysis, Design, Modeling, and Visualization of G+3 and G+4 Buildings in
Virtual Reality using a Set of Civil Engineering Software
REVA/CE/2022-2024 24
Cost Analysis, Design, Modeling, and Visualization of G+3 and G+4 Buildings in
Virtual Reality using a Set of Civil Engineering Software
Next from section properties click on slab sections and add new material andmodify as
for our requirement. Similarly add Diaphragms to get the slab load concentrated at one
position for the purpose of wind and seismic load.
At the left-hand side tool bar, we will find quick draw beams, quick draw columns and
quick draw floor or wall as shown in figure 3.34. Using these commands, we can
REVA/CE/2022-2024 25
Cost Analysis, Design, Modeling, and Visualization of G+3 and G+4 Buildings in
Virtual Reality using a Set of Civil Engineering Software
. drag the cursor to assign the properties to the structure. Unlike STAAD.Pro ETABS
recognizes the vertical elements as columns.
In the properties of object dialogue box change the property into materials that we
have defined earlier and simply drag the cursor over the structure to assign the properties to
the structure. Or click on assign in tool bar and click on frame→ section property and assign
the properties to their designated element.
Click on assign in tool bar→ joint→ restraints. Add fixed support at the ground
floor confining only up to one story at bottom of the right hand side.
For assigning loads go to assign→ frame loads→ distributed loads and add the load
values for both dead load and live load, changing the load pattern name, direction of
REVA/CE/2022-2024 26
Cost Analysis, Design, Modeling, and Visualization of G+3 and G+4 Buildings in
Virtual Reality using a Set of Civil Engineering Software
. application and apply the loads. For these live loads and dead loads we have to drag the
cursor over the elements in order to apply correct loads at correct places, replacing
one load with other, as exterior and interior walls impart different magnitudes of loadson a
structure.
Go to define in tool bar and click on load pattern to add seismic and wind loads as
shown in figure 3.35. Wind load and Seismic load get assigned to the whole structure.
REVA/CE/2022-2024 27
Cost Analysis, Design, Modeling, and Visualization of G+3 and G+4 Buildings in
Virtual Reality using a Set of Civil Engineering Software
Here click on add default design combos, a dialogue box for combination opens as
figure 3.38, there check concrete frame design, concrete slab design and convert to user
combinations and click ok.
REVA/CE/2022-2024 28
Cost Analysis, Design, Modeling, and Visualization of G+3 and G+4 Buildings in
Virtual Reality using a Set of Civil Engineering Software
. 3.3.5 Analysis
Go to analyze on the tool bar and first check the model for any warning messages that are
being generated. In check model dialogue box as shown in figure 3.39 click on select all
and ok. When a no warning messages are generated, we can further continue with the run
analysis.
REVA/CE/2022-2024 29
Cost Analysis, Design, Modeling, and Visualization of G+3 and G+4 Buildings in
Virtual Reality using a Set of Civil Engineering Software
Go to design in tool bar and click on concrete frame design and start the design check.Later
check whether all the members have passed the design check or not. If all the members
passed the design whole design is completed. If not, we need to check the failed member
and change the dimensions of that particular member and run the design check again, until
all the members are passed.
REVA/CE/2022-2024 30
Cost Analysis, Design, Modeling, and Visualization of G+3 and G+4 Buildings in
Virtual Reality using a Set of Civil Engineering Software
. Once the design is done 3D model is represented as shown in the figure 3.42. Also,we
need to design the slab separately. Go to design→ concrete slab design→ start
design. That ends the complete design of the structure. Also, ETABS providespredefined
report for the structure that is being designed.
Go to file→ create report→ and select the kind of report that we need from the above
available 3 formats of reports.
With the advancement in the modern technology not only our horizon has widened but it
also has made us utilize the 3D world effectively. The current era of technology has seen a
paradigm shift from 2D to 3D and 4D modelling. The concept of 3D modeling is to
represent a 2D area into 3D space. With the effective use of 3D modelling one can visualize
the finished product with all its functional elements even before the construction has starts.
REVA/CE/2022-2024 31
Cost Analysis, Design, Modeling, and Visualization of G+3 and G+4 Buildings in
Virtual Reality using a Set of Civil Engineering Software
For the purpose of 3D modelling, basically we generate 2D floor plans of the facility
and incorporate the height data. Here in Revit Architecture heights of floors are
represented with levels. Providing the height data, we generate a Basic Three- Dimensional
model. To this Basic Three-Dimensional model, we can add necessary details like texture,
doors, windows and staircase to generate Differentiated Texture model. By adding
components like beds, sofas, wash basins, chairs, etc., we can generate the final complete
functional model of the facility.
Here in Revit Architecture under projects we have different templates for model
creation as shown in figure 3.43. We here have used the construction template and
generated both the G+3 and Duplex models. Family templates are used to work on family
components like lightings, parametric components etc.
REVA/CE/2022-2024 32
Cost Analysis, Design, Modeling, and Visualization of G+3 and G+4 Buildings in
Virtual Reality using a Set of Civil Engineering Software
REVA/CE/2022-2024 33
Cost Analysis, Design, Modeling, and Visualization of G+3 and G+4 Buildings in
Virtual Reality using a Set of Civil Engineering Software
All the components are added using ribbon tools, details regarding project are
provided in project browser and properties of components are provided in the properties
box, where elemental characteristics can be viewed modified.
REVA/CE/2022-2024 34
Cost Analysis, Design, Modeling, and Visualization of G+3 and G+4 Buildings in
Virtual Reality using a Set of Civil Engineering Software
General structures can be modelled using the system provided ribbon tools. Clicking
on the components icon all the family components are installed into the project. For few
interior components to be installed into the project we have to use theModel-in-place ribbon
in order to create extrusions and void extrusions. These extrusions are mostly used to set a
plane for TV cabinets, Kitchen cabinets, Cupboards in bedrooms, false ceiling works etc.,
also the wall extrusions are used to model the elevation of the structures.
REVA/CE/2022-2024 35
Cost Analysis, Design, Modeling, and Visualization of G+3 and G+4 Buildings in
Virtual Reality using a Set of Civil Engineering Software
In elevations we have views from all four directions. Initially only level 1 and level 2 are
present in a Revit project file. These elevation views help us to add levels to form number
of floors over level 2. Similarly, we do have sectional and camera views.
REVA/CE/2022-2024 36
Cost Analysis, Design, Modeling, and Visualization of G+3 and G+4 Buildings in
Virtual Reality using a Set of Civil Engineering Software
These rendered views from figures 3.53 & 3.54 are generated by Native Rendering
the models within Revit Architecture. Better views are provided with plug- ins like V-ray,
Lumion, Enscape, Twinmotion and Cloud Rendering.
Massing and site window is used to provide topography, site components, roads etc., for the
model. Topography, site components and few other features are available within the
massing and site ribbon tool, for providing road we have to split the site area that is to be
occupied by road and provide asphalt material over the region.
Before entering into Virtual Reality, a good quality rendered walkthrough of the structure is
very important to view all the elements inside a structure. Our modelling software comes up
a set of rendering software/ plug-ins that does provide videos which make a visual treat to
those to watch them.
REVA/CE/2022-2024 37
Cost Analysis, Design, Modeling, and Visualization of G+3 and G+4 Buildings in
Virtual Reality using a Set of Civil Engineering Software
Blender Maxwell
Octane Render
Autodesk Revit
Cinema 4D Lumion
3D Viz Render
Punch Home Design StudioV-
ray
Enscape Corona
RenderShapespark
Among this set of plug-ins, we need one powerful plug-in that satisfies our need
with less efforts. Some among them require high set of skills to master, some lack in
features, some rather have steep price tag, low render speed and quality etc.,
3.5.3 VR in Enscape
REVA/CE/2022-2024 38
Cost Analysis, Design, Modeling, and Visualization of G+3 and G+4 Buildings in
Virtual Reality using a Set of Civil Engineering Software
. just click our cursor at VR headset option as shown in figure 3.56 on the Enscape
window to visualize the building.
REVA/CE/2022-2024 39
Cost Analysis, Design, Modeling, and Visualization of G+3 and G+4 Buildings in
Virtual Reality using a Set of Civil Engineering Software
. Similarly for creating a rendered video, we have video editor option. Wherewe
can provide video path of our interest and quality can also be varied based on
requirements. Keyframes are the positions that help to create the video path. Videocan
be rendered in required time stamp, focal point and field of view for providing real handy
cam feeling to the viewer.
3.6 MS PROJECT
MS Project is that one project management software that is in use all over the world for its
ease in working. Project management software helps project manager to develop a
schedule, assign resources to tasks, process tracking, budget management and to analyze the
workloads.
Resources are assigned to tasks based on the requirement and also influenced by
manual estimation as preferred number of days for certain work are brought over.
REVA/CE/2022-2024 40
Cost Analysis, Design, Modeling, and Visualization of G+3 and G+4 Buildings in
Virtual Reality using a Set of Civil Engineering Software
Sign
contract and
. 6 1d Thu 08-07-21 Thu 08-07-21 5 ₹ 10,000.00
notice to
proceed
Apply for
7 1d Fri 09-07-21 Fri 09-07-21 ₹ 40,000.00
Permits
Building
8 permits from 1d Fri 09-07-21 Fri 09-07-21 6 ₹ 40,000.00
Authorities
Mon 12-07-
9 Site Work 3d Sat 10-07-21 21 ₹ 6,750.00
Ground
10 1d Sat 10-07-21 Sat 10-07-21 8 ₹ 2,300.00
Clearance
11 Leveling 1d Sun 11-07-21 Sun 11-07-21 10 ₹ 2,300.00
12 Markings 1d Mon 12-07-21 Mon 12-07-21 11 ₹ 2,150.00
13 Foundation 18 d Tue 13-07-21 Fri 30-07-21 ₹ 125,773.00
Earthwork
14
Excavation 2d Tue 13-07-21 Wed 14-07-21 12 ₹ 27,650.00
Reinforceme
15 nt for 3d Thu 15-07-21 Sat 17-07-21 14 ₹ 50,660.00
Footing
16 Shuttering 2d Sun 18-07-21 Mon 19-07-21 15 ₹ 8,411.00
Pouring
17 3d Tue 20-07-21 Thu 22-07-21 16 ₹ 34,552.00
Concrete
18 curing 7d Fri 23-07-21 Thu 29-07-21 17 ₹ 2,000.00
19 Deshuttering 1d Fri 30-07-21 Fri 30-07-21 18 ₹ 2,500.00
Plinth Level
20 22 d Sat 31-07-21 Sat 21-08-21 ₹ 150,025.00
Work
21 Shuttering 2d Sat 31-07-21 Sun 01-08-21 19 ₹ 7,411.00
Reinforceme
22 nt 3d Mon 02-08-21 Wed 04-08-21 21 ₹ 50,660.00
Pouring
23 3d Thu 05-08-21 Sat 07-08-21 22 ₹ 24,142.00
Concrete
24 Curing 7d Sun 08-08-21 Sat 14-08-21 23 ₹ 2,000.00
25 Deshuttering 1d Sun 15-08-21 Sun 15-08-21 24 ₹ 3,000.00
Brickwork
26 upto Plinth 7d Sun 15-08-21 Sat 21-08-21 24 ₹ 62,812.00
Level
Ground Mon 02-08-
27 Floor 18 d 21 Thu 19-08-21 ₹ 237,213.00
Column
28 Reinforceme 3d Mon 02-08-21 Wed 04-08-21 21 ₹ 50,660.00
nt
29 Shuttering 2d Thu 05-08-21 Fri 06-08-21 28 ₹ 12,921.00
30 Concreting 5d Sat 07-08-21 Wed 11-08-21 29 ₹ 38,722.00
REVA/CE/2022-2024 41
Cost Analysis, Design, Modeling, and Visualization of G+3 and G+4 Buildings in
Virtual Reality using a Set of Civil Engineering Software
Shuttering
for Ground
. 33 2d Mon 02-08-21 Tue 03-08-21 21 ₹ 4,456.00
Floor
Staircase
Reinforceme
34 2d Wed 04-08-21 Thu 05-08-21 33 ₹ 51,340.00
nt
35 Concreting 2d Fri 06-08-21 Sat 07-08-21 34 ₹ 21,302.00
36 Curing 7d Sun 08-08-21 Sat 14-08-21 35 ₹ 2,000.00
37 Deshuttering 1d Sun 15-08-21 Sun 15-08-21 36 ₹ 2,730.00
Brickwork
38 Ground 4d Sun 15-08-21 Wed 18-08-21 36 ₹ 44,032.00
Floor
39 1st Floor 52 d Sun 15-08-21 Tue 05-10-21 ₹ 569,128.00
Shuttering
for ground
40 3d Sun 15-08-21 Tue 17-08-21 36 ₹ 11,531.00
floor slab
and beam
Reinforceme
41 nt for slab 4d Wed 18-08-21 Sat 21-08-21 40 ₹ 58,150.00
and beam
42 Concreting 7d Sun 22-08-21 Sat 28-08-21 41 ₹ 37,862.00
43 Curing 7d Sun 29-08-21 Sat 04-09-21 42 ₹ 2,000.00
Column
44 Reinforceme 3d Sun 05-09-21 Tue 07-09-21 43 ₹ 50,660.00
nt
45 Shuttering 2d Wed 08-09-21 Thu 09-09-21 44 ₹ 5,456.00
46 Concreting 5d Fri 10-09-21 Tue 14-09-21 45 ₹ 35,722.00
47 Curing 7d Wed 15-09-21 Tue 21-09-21 46 ₹ 2,000.00
REVA/CE/2022-2024 42
Cost Analysis, Design, Modeling, and Visualization of G+3 and G+4 Buildings in
Virtual Reality using a Set of Civil Engineering Software
Shuttering
for 1st floor
. 55 3d Wed 22-09-21 Fri 24-09-21 47 ₹ 8,491.00
slab and
beam
Reinforcem
56 ent for slab 4d Sat 25-09-21 Tue 28-09-21 55 ₹ 58,150.00
and beam
REVA/CE/2022-2024 43
Cost Analysis, Design, Modeling, and Visualization of G+3 and G+4 Buildings in
Virtual Reality using a Set of Civil Engineering Software
REVA/CE/2022-2024 44
Cost Analysis, Design, Modeling, and Visualization of G+3 and G+4 Buildings in
Virtual Reality using a Set of Civil Engineering Software
. Compound
99 41 d Sat 15-01-22 Thu 24-02-22 ₹ 1,259,198.00
Wall
100 Water Tank 5d Sat 15-01-22 Wed 19-01-22 98 ₹ 105,468.00
Compound
Wall
101 20 d Thu 20-01-22 Tue 08-02-22 100 ₹ 132,817.00
includes
painting
Exterior wall
102
painting 10 d Wed 09-02-22 Fri 18-02-22 101 ₹ 24,530.00
Floor
103 Finishes (All 20 d Thu 20-01-22 Tue 08-02-22 100 ₹ 84,192.00
Floors)
Cleaning
104 and 15 d Wed 09-02-22 Wed 23-02-22 101 ₹ 92,200.00
Finishing
Labor
105
Component 1d Thu 24-02-22 Thu 24-02-22 104 ₹ 146,833.00
Contractors
106 1d Thu 24-02-22 Thu 24-02-22 104 ₹ 673,158.00
Profit
Finish
107 Project and 0d Wed 23-02-22 Wed 23-02-22 104 ₹ 0.00
Handover
REVA/CE/2022-2024 45
Cost Analysis, Design, Modeling, and Visualization of G+3 and G+4 Buildings in
Virtual Reality using a Set of Civil Engineering Software
REVA/CE/2022-2024 46
Cost Analysis, Design, Modeling, and Visualization of G+3 and G+4 Buildings in
Virtual Reality using a Set of Civil Engineering Software
REVA/CE/2022-2024 47
Cost Analysis, Design, Modeling, and Visualization of G+3 and G+4 Buildings in
Virtual Reality using a Set of Civil Engineering Software
REVA/CE/2022-2024 48
Cost Analysis, Design, Modeling, and Visualization of G+3 and G+4 Buildings in
Virtual Reality using a Set of Civil Engineering Software
REVA/CE/2022-2024 49
Cost Analysis, Design, Modeling, and Visualization of G+3 and G+4 Buildings in
Virtual Reality using a Set of Civil Engineering Software
REVA/CE/2022-2024 50
Cost Analysis, Design, Modeling, and Visualization of G+3 and G+4 Buildings in
Virtual Reality using a Set of Civil Engineering Software
REVA/CE/2022-2024 51
Cost Analysis, Design, Modeling, and Visualization of G+3 and G+4 Buildings in
Virtual Reality using a Set of Civil Engineering Software
. (All
Floors)
119 Cleaning and Sat 19-03-22 Sat 02-04-22 ₹ 92,200.00
15 d 116
Finishing
120 Labor Sat 19-03-22 Sat 19-03-22 ₹ 175,209.00
1 d? 116
Component
121 Contractors Sat 19-03-22 Sat 19-03-22 ₹ 608,962.00
1 d? 116
Profit
122 Finish Project Fri 18-03-22 Fri 18-03-22 ₹ 0.00
and 0d 118
Handover
Above tables represents the Task sheet and Resource sheets that are produced using
MS Project. Task Sheet deals with the work progress or scheduling, work progress can also
be tracked in the Gantt chart. Resource Sheet has all the resources that are involved in the
project. Material, labor, machinery, etc., are all included in theresource sheet.
3.7 ESTIMATION
REVA/CE/2022-2024 52
Cost Analysis, Design, Modeling, and Visualization of G+3 and G+4 Buildings in
Virtual Reality using a Set of Civil Engineering Software
REVA/CE/2022-2024 53
Cost Analysis, Design, Modeling, and Visualization of G+3 and G+4 Buildings in
Virtual Reality using a Set of Civil Engineering Software
REVA/CE/2022-2024 54
Cost Analysis, Design, Modeling, and Visualization of G+3 and G+4 Buildings in
Virtual Reality using a Set of Civil Engineering Software
REVA/CE/2022-2024 55
Cost Analysis, Design, Modeling, and Visualization of G+3 and G+4 Buildings in
Virtual Reality using a Set of Civil Engineering Software
Mason
. Skilled 2 No 1 540 1080
Semi skilled 1 No 1 500 500
Mazdoor 4 No 1 460 1840
Total 3420
The working days = 2
The amount of PCC foundation work 3420*2
Total 6840
16. Steel
Barbender 4 No 1 665 2660
Barbender helper 2 No 1 500 1000
Total 3660
The total working days = 25
The amount of steel work = 3660*25
Total 91500
17 Concrete
Mason
Skilled 2 No 1 540 1080
Semi skilled 1 No 1 500 500
Mazdoor 4 No 1 460 1840
Total 3420
The total working days =36
The amount of steel = 36*3420
Total 123120
18. Brickwork
Mason
Skilled 2 No 1 550 1100
Semi skilled 1 No 1 500 500
Mazdoor 4 No 1 460 1840
Total 3440
The total working days =40
The amount of the brick work = 40*3440
REVA/CE/2022-2024 56
Cost Analysis, Design, Modeling, and Visualization of G+3 and G+4 Buildings in
Virtual Reality using a Set of Civil Engineering Software
Total 137600
. 19 Plastering in cement mortar (1:6)
Mason 2 No 1 550 1100
mazdoor 3 No 1 460 1380
Total 2480
The total working days = 20
The amount of the plastering work = 2480*20
Total 49600
20 Flooring in cement mortar (1:6) with 20 mm thickness
Mason
Skilled 2 No 1 550 1100
Semi skilled 1 No 1 500 500
Mazdoor 4 No 1 460 1840
Total 3440
The total working days = 10
The amount of the flooring work = 10*3440
Total 34400
21. Wood work
Carpenter
Skilled 4 No 1 615 2460
Semi skilled 3 No 1 500 1500
Total 3960
The total working days = 6
The cost of the painting = 6 *3960
Total 23760
22 Glass Fitter
Skilled 1 No 1 585 585
Semi skilled 1 No 1 500 500
Total 1085
The number of working days = 2
The amount of glass fitter = 2*1085
Total 2170
REVA/CE/2022-2024 57
Cost Analysis, Design, Modeling, and Visualization of G+3 and G+4 Buildings in
Virtual Reality using a Set of Civil Engineering Software
23 Painting
. Painter
Skilled 4 No 1 615 2460
Semi skilled 2 No 1 500 1000
Total 3460
The total working days = 21
The cost of the painting = 21*3460
Total 72660
24 Electrical
Electrician 4 No 1 610 610
Electrician helper 3 No 1 500 500
Total 1110
The total working days = 7
The amount of electrical work =1110*7
Total 7770
25. Shuttering and Deshuttering
Carpenter skilled 4 No 1 615 615
Carpenter semi skilled 3 No 1 500 500
Total 1115
The total working days= 27
The amount of shuttering and deshuttering = 1115*27
Total 30105
26. Plumbing
Plumber 4 No 1 615 615
Helper plumber 3 NOo 1 500 500
Total 1115
The total working days = 7
The amount of plumbing work = 1115 * 7
Total 7805
Total 587330
Add 25% extra on labour charges = 0.25*587330 =146833 146833
The total amount of material = 2863092
REVA/CE/2022-2024 58
Cost Analysis, Design, Modeling, and Visualization of G+3 and G+4 Buildings in
Virtual Reality using a Set of Civil Engineering Software
Description of
S.No Units Quantity Rate Total
Items
1 JCB 1 hr 1 1000 1000
3
Excavation capacity of JCB for 1 hr is 40 m
Total volume of Excavation = 281.68 m3
Excavation time = 281.68/40 = 7.042 hrs
Levelling of Earth Work = 2 hrs
Total work time of JCB = 7.042+2 = 9.042 hrs
Cost for excavation and levelling = 9.042*1000 = 9042
Total=9042
2 Materials
Cement 1 MT 0.45 3672 2379.46
Fine Aggregate 1 m3 0.45 510 229.5
Coarse Aggregate 1 m3 0.9 1220 1098
Total=3707
Volume of PCC Foundation in Building = 84.63 m3
Cost of PCC Foundation = 84.63*3707 = 313723
Total=313723.41
3 Steel
Steel 1 MT 1 41500 41500
Total tons of steel in building = 11
Cost of steel = 41500*11 = 456500
Total=456500
4 Concrete
Cement 1 MT 0.45 3672 2379.46
Fine Aggregate 1 m3 0.45 510 229.5
Coarse Aggregate 1 m3 0.9 1220 1098
Total=3707
Total Volume of Concrete = 125.10 m3
Total cost of concrete = 125.1*3707 = 463745.7
Total=463745.7
5 Brickwork
Bricks 1000 No 500 6750 3375
Cement 1 MT 0.0576 3672 211.5072
Fine Aggregate 1 m3 0.2 605 212
Total=3798.5
Total Brick masonry in building = 136.257 m3
Cost of the brickwork = 136.257*3798.5 = 24
REVA/CE/2022-2024 59
Cost Analysis, Design, Modeling, and Visualization of G+3 and G+4 Buildings in
Virtual Reality using a Set of Civil Engineering Software
Total=517572.21
6 Plastering in cement mortar (1:6) with 12 mm thickness
.
Cement 1 MT 0.025*144 3672 132.192
0
Fine Aggregate 1 m3 0.15 605 90.75
Total=222.94
Total Plastering = 1224.228 m2
Cost of Plastering = 222.94*1224.28 = 27292.939
Total=27292.939
7 Plastering in cement mortar (1:6) with 20 mm thickness
Cement 1 MT 0.035*1.4 3672 185.07
40
Fine Aggregate 1 m3 0.21 605 127.05
Total=312.12
2
Total Plastering = 434.4 m
Cost of Plastering = 312.12*434.4
Total=13558.492
8 Flooring in Cement mortar (1:6) with 25 mm thickness
Cement 1 MT 0.042*1.4 3672 222.08
4
Fine Aggregate 1 m3 0.25 605 127.5
Total=349.58
2
Total Flooring = 393 m
Cost of Flooring = 349.58*392.99
Total=13738.144
9 Ceiling Plastering in Cement mortar (1:6) with 6 mm thickness
Cement 1 MT 0.025*1.4 3672 132.19
4
Fine Aggregate 1 m3 0.15 605 90.75
Total=222.94
Total ceiling plastering = 97.3 m3
Cost of ceiling plastering = 222.94*97.3
Total=2169.2
10 Teak Wood
Wood 1 m3 1 130525 130525
Total=130525
3
Total quantity of wood = 9.843 m
Cost of wood = 9.843*130525
Total=1284757.57
11 Glass
2
Plan flat glass 8mm 1 m 0.66 193 391.38
Total=391.38
2
Total quantity of glass = 67.6 m
Cost of wood = 391.38*67.6
Total=26457.288
12 Paint
Oil based paint 1 liter 1 248 248
Total=248
2
One liter of paint covers 6.5 m
REVA/CE/2022-2024 60
Cost Analysis, Design, Modeling, and Visualization of G+3 and G+4 Buildings in
Virtual Reality using a Set of Civil Engineering Software
REVA/CE/2022-2024 61
Cost Analysis, Design, Modeling, and Visualization of G+3 and G+4 Buildings in
Virtual Reality using a Set of Civil Engineering Software
REVA/CE/2022-2024 62
Cost Analysis, Design, Modeling, and Visualization of G+3 and G+4 Buildings in
Virtual Reality using a Set of Civil Engineering Software
REVA/CE/2022-2024 63
Cost Analysis, Design, Modeling, and Visualization of G+3 and G+4 Buildings in
Virtual Reality using a Set of Civil Engineering Software
. CHAPTER-4
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Fig. 4.1. Shear Force Diagram of G+3 building in STAAD.Pro by applying load
combinations
REVA/CE/2022-2024 64
Cost Analysis, Design, Modeling, and Visualization of G+3 and G+4 Buildings in
Virtual Reality using a Set of Civil Engineering Software
Fig. 4.2. Shear Force Diagram of Duplex building in STAAD.Pro by applying load
combinations
REVA/CE/2022-2024 65
Cost Analysis, Design, Modeling, and Visualization of G+3 and G+4 Buildings in
Virtual Reality using a Set of Civil Engineering Software
Fig. 4.3. Bending Moment Diagram of G+3 building in STAAD.Pro by applying load
combinations
REVA/CE/2022-2024 66
Cost Analysis, Design, Modeling, and Visualization of G+3 and G+4 Buildings in
Virtual Reality using a Set of Civil Engineering Software
REVA/CE/2022-2024 67
Cost Analysis, Design, Modeling, and Visualization of G+3 and G+4 Buildings in
Virtual Reality using a Set of Civil Engineering Software
REVA/CE/2022-2024 68
Cost Analysis, Design, Modeling, and Visualization of G+3 and G+4 Buildings in
Virtual Reality using a Set of Civil Engineering Software
REVA/CE/2022-2024 69
Cost Analysis, Design, Modeling, and Visualization of G+3 and G+4 Buildings in
Virtual Reality using a Set of Civil Engineering Software
REVA/CE/2022-2024 70
Cost Analysis, Design, Modeling, and Visualization of G+3 and G+4 Buildings in
Virtual Reality using a Set of Civil Engineering Software
REVA/CE/2022-2024 71
Cost Analysis, Design, Modeling, and Visualization of G+3 and G+4 Buildings in
Virtual Reality using a Set of Civil Engineering Software
REVA/CE/2022-2024 72
Cost Analysis, Design, Modeling, and Visualization of G+3 and G+4 Buildings in
Virtual Reality using a Set of Civil Engineering Software
. Table. 4.1. Comparison of SFD, BMD and Displacement of Conventional and Hybrid
Structures
Here we have considered Live Load case in both Conventional and Hybrid structure to
study the difference in Shear Force, Bending Moment and Displacement. Similarly,there are
21 more load cases generated for this study.
Comparing the columns reinforcements at 3rd floor from both STAAD.Pro and ETABS.
This provides a brief overview on the area of steel obtained from each software.
Table. 4.2. Comparison of Area of Steel from STAAD.Pro and ETABS
Ast from STAAD.Pro Ast from
Column Number
(mm2) ETABS (mm2)
C1 804.25 675.7
C2 804.25 683.4
C3 804.25 675.7
C4 804.25 675.54
C5 804.25 675.7
C6 804.25 678.23
C7 804.25 675.7
C8 804.25 844.62
REVA/CE/2022-2024 73
Cost Analysis, Design, Modeling, and Visualization of G+3 and G+4 Buildings in
Virtual Reality using a Set of Civil Engineering Software
. C9 804.25 675.7
C10 804.25 676.92
C11 804.25 675.7
C12 452.39 676.95
C13 804.25 675.7
C14 452.39 675.7
C15 804.25 675.7
From the above table it can be stated that ETABS provides an economical section compared
to STAAD.Pro. ETABS provides required area of steel for a column or beam that is being
designed but in STAAD.Pro we find uniform section and uniform reinforcement while
going from bottom to top. In ETABS we find reduction in area ofsteel while moving from
bottom to top, this process of steel provision makes astructure economical while designing
using ETABS software. ETABS provides 9.2% less steel compared to STAAD.Pro
Comparing the G+3 building and Duplex building in terms of cost we find a difference of ₹
9,60,526. Rise in cost is due to an increased floor as Duplex is a G+4 structure, structural
elements are increased in number, interior and exterior works are also increased, these
components pay for the increased cost in Duplex Structure.
4.3.2 SSR Based Estimation vs MS Project Generated Estimation
Table. 4.4. Cost comparison of G+3 and Duplex Building Estimation by SSR and MS
Project
SSR MS Project
G+3 ₹ 51,36,753 ₹ 55,13,600
Duplex ₹ 60,97,279 ₹ 63,88,326
REVA/CE/2022-2024 74
Cost Analysis, Design, Modeling, and Visualization of G+3 and G+4 Buildings in
Virtual Reality using a Set of Civil Engineering Software
.
From this comparison we can find that the costs for building construction is a bit high for
MS Project Generated estimation. The reason behind the increase in cost is due to allocation
of resources and labor, few of the assigned resources are at critical stage. While overcoming
those critical allocation of labors, a greater number of labors are assigned for certain task,
thus final construction costs increase.
REVA/CE/2022-2024 75
Cost Analysis, Design, Modeling, and Visualization of G+3 and G+4 Buildings in
Virtual Reality using a Set of Civil Engineering Software
. CHAPTER-5
CONCLUSION
• Virtual Reality has bought great composure over construction field. Advancements in
technology are upgraded and they provide the final results at the initial stages. This does
provide greater amount of satisfaction to the users.
• VR and AR technologies has achieved higher standards by incorporating other frontier
technologies and commonly used in other application fields.
• AutoCAD drafting are way old technology but provides basic theme for further
implementation in 3D and 4D modellings.
• Analysis and Design outcomes are very quick in software compared to manual design.
• For G+3 Building (Conventional Structure)
o Maximum Shear Force is 95.349kN
o Maximum Bending Moment is 69.796kN-m
o Maximum Displacement is 19.036mm
• For Duplex Building
o Maximum Shear Force is 96.398kN
o Maximum Bending Moment is 98.571kN-m
o Maximum Displacement is 28.561mm
• For G+3 Hybrid Structure
o Maximum Shear Force is 64.708kN
o Maximum Bending Moment is 57.709kN-m
o Maximum Displacement is 2.979mm
• From STAAD.Pro Hybrid Structure provides 39.37% lesser deflection for aframe.
• This study states that ETASB provides 9.2% less amount of steel compared to
STAAD.Pro
• Manual SSR based estimation is more accurate compared to MS Project Software
generated estimation.
• SSR based estimation states that it costs around ₹ 51.5 Lakhs and ₹ 70 Lakhs for
constructing G+3 and Duplex (G+4) buildings respectively, without GST being
involved.
REVA/CE/2022-2024 76
Cost Analysis, Design, Modeling, and Visualization of G+3 and G+4 Buildings in
Virtual Reality using a Set of Civil Engineering Software
. FUTURE SCOPE
REVA/CE/2022-2024 77
Cost Analysis, Design, Modeling, and Visualization of G+3 and G+4 Buildings in
Virtual Reality using a Set of Civil Engineering Software
. REFERENCES
REVA/CE/2022-2024 78
Cost Analysis, Design, Modeling, and Visualization of G+3 and G+4 Buildings in
Virtual Reality using a Set of Civil Engineering Software
. 9. Sultan. M.R, Peera. D.G (2015). “Dynamic Analysis of Multi storey Building for
Different Shapes”. International Journal of Innovative Research in
Advanced Engineering. ISSN:2349-2163. Issue 8, vol 2. pp. 85-91
10. Lee. S, Tae. S, Roh. S and Kim. T (2015). “Green Template for Life Cycle
Assessment of Buildings Based on Building information Modeling; focus on
Embodied Environmental Impact”. Architectural Engineering, Hanyang University.
pp. 16498-16512
11. Soni. P, Tamrakar. P.L and Kumhar. V (2016). “Structural Analysis of Multistory
Building of Different Shear Wall Location and Heights”. International Journal of
Engineering Trends and Technology. Vol 32, number 1. pp. 50-57
12. Kulkarni. T, Kulkarni. S, Algur. A, Kolhar. M.H (2016). “Analysis and Design of
High Rise Building Frame using STAAD Pro”. International Journal of Research in
Engineering and Technology. eISSN; 2319-1163| pISSN: 2321- 7308, Volume:5
Issue:4| pp. 235-237
13. Deshmukh. D.R, Yadav. A.K, Supekar. S.N, Thakur. A.B, Sonawane. H.P and Jain.
I.M (2016). “Analysis and Design of G+19 Storey Building Using Staad- Pro”.
International Journal of Engineering Research and Application ISSN: 2248-9622,
Vol. 6, Issue 7, (Part-1), pp.17-19
14. Gupta. V, Goswami. A, Goel. N, Srivastava. A (2016). “3D Modelling of Amity
University Noida Campus Using Revit Architecture and ARCGIS”. International
Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology Volume 7, Issue 4,July-August 2016,
pp.48-61, Article ID: IJCIET_07_04_005
15. Jose. R, Mathew. R, Devan. S, Venu. S, Mohith. Y.S, (2017). “Analysis and Design
of Commercial Building using ETABS”. International Research Journal of
Engineering and Technology. Vol 04, Issue 06 . pp. 625-630
16. Panchal. A, Dwivedi. R (2017). “Analysis and Design of G+6 Building in Different
Seismic Zones of India”. International Journal of Innovative Research in Science,
Engineering and technology. Vol 06, issue 7, July 2017. pp. 14331-14338
17. Abhinav. V, Naidu. M.V, Sreenath. S, Mohan. S.M (2017). “Seismic Analysis of
Multi storey RC Buildings with Shear Walls Using STAAD.Pro”. International
Journal of Innovative Technology and Research. Vol 04, Issue 5.pp. 3776-3779
REVA/CE/2022-2024 79
Cost Analysis, Design, Modeling, and Visualization of G+3 and G+4 Buildings in
Virtual Reality using a Set of Civil Engineering Software
. 18. Harle S.M (2017). “Analysis by STAAD.Pro and Design Of Structural Events by
MATLAB”. Journal of Asian Scientific Research. Vol 07, number
5. pp. 145-164
19. Jayakrishna. T, Murali. K, Satish. P, Seetunya. (2018). “Seismic Analysis of
Regular and Irregular Multistory Buildings by using STAAD-Pro”. International
Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology, Volume 9, Issue 1, pp. 431-439,
Article ID: IJCIET_09_01_042
20. Kokate. P.B, Darade. M (2018). “Cost Planning and Estimation for Residential
Building”. International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology.
Vol 3, Issue 4. pp. 624-627
21. Vasilieva. N (2018). “Parametric Modelling in Architectural and Construction
Design in AUTOCAD”. South Ural State University, 76. pp. 1-6
22. Bhosale. A.D, Hatkhambkar. A.P, Katkar. R. V, Babar. S.B, Gorivale. S.P (2018).
“Analysis and Design of Multi Storey Building by Using STAAD. Pro V8i”.
International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology. Vol 3, Issue
4. pp. 148-150
23. Bahar. L, Vyas. J.N (2019). “Review Paper on Comparative Analysis of Flat Slabs
and Conventional RC Slabs with and without Shear Walls”. International Research
Journal of Engineering and Technology. Vol 06, Issue 02. pp. 77-81
24. Kumar. T.D, Mohammed. I, Mohammed. I.P.Q, Mohammed. S.A, Syed. A.R,
Mohammed. A.K (2019). “Design and analysis of high-rise building using
STAAD.Pro”. International Journal of Civil Engineering. Volume 6, Issue 6, 7-14.
pp. 7-14
25. Mohammed. S.A.Z, Mohammed. S.A, Moosa. A.B, Syed. S, Taher.U.Q and
Mohammed. I.K (2019). “Design and structural Analysis of Multi storey Building
(both commercial and residential) by using STAAD.Pro V8i”. International
research journal of engineering and technology. Vol 6, issue 7. pp. 148-151
26. Rakesh. E (2019). “Design and Modeling of G+5 Commercial Building by
Autodesk Revit Architecture”. International Journal of Engineering and Advanced
Technology. Vol 9, Issue 2, Dec 2019. pp. 4732-4736
REVA/CE/2022-2024 80
Cost Analysis, Design, Modeling, and Visualization of G+3 and G+4 Buildings in
Virtual Reality using a Set of Civil Engineering Software
27. Kavya H.K (2020). “Analysis and design of multi storey building using
STAAD.Pro and ETABS”. International Research Journal of Engineering and
Technology. Vol 7, Issue 1. pp. 1621-1627
28. Krishna. P.L (2020). “Analysis and Design of (G+20) Multi-Storey Residential
Building Using STAAD.Pro”. International journal for Innovative Engineering and
Management Research. Volume 09, Issue 03. pp. 22-26
29. Agashe. R, Baghele. M, Deshmukh. V, Khomane. S, Patle. G, Yadav. K(2020). “To
Study Analysis and Design of Multi-Storey building using Staad- pro. and
Comparing with Manual Calculations”. In the Proceedings of The International
Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e- ISSN: 2395-0056,
Volume: 07, 04 April 2020, p-ISSN: 2395-0072.
30. Vats. F (2020). “Review Paper on Design and Analysis of Multi storey building by
the Use of STAAD.Pro”. International journal of advanced research, ideas and
innovations in technology. Vol 5, issue 3. pp. 327-328
REVA/CE/2022-2024 81
Cost Analysis, Design, Modeling, and Visualization of G+3 and G+4 Buildings in
Virtual Reality using a Set of Civil Engineering Software
. APPENDIXES
APPENDIX-1
REVA/CE/2022-2024 1
Cost Analysis, Design, Modeling, and Visualization of G+3 and G+4 Buildings in
Virtual Reality using a Set of Civil Engineering Software
. 100 72 75; 101 4 19; 102 5 20; 103 6 21; 104 7 22; 105 8 23; 106 9 24;
107 10 25; 108 11 26; 109 12 27; 110 13 28; 111 14 29; 112 15 30; 113 19 34;
114 20 35; 115 21 36; 116 22 37; 117 23 38; 118 24 39; 119 25 40; 120 26 41;
121 27 42; 122 28 43; 123 29 44; 124 30 45; 125 34 49; 126 35 50; 127 36 51;
128 37 52; 129 38 53; 130 39 54; 131 40 55; 132 41 56; 133 42 57; 134 43 58;
135 44 59; 136 45 60; 137 49 64; 138 50 65; 139 51 66; 140 52 67; 141 53 68;
142 54 69; 143 55 70; 144 56 71; 145 57 72; 146 58 73; 147 59 74; 148 60 75;
ELEMENT INCIDENCES SHELL
156 4 5 20 19; 157 5 6 21 20; 158 20 21 36 35; 159 35 34 19 20;
160 34 35 50 49; 161 35 36 51 50; 162 50 51 66 65; 163 7 8 23 22;
164 8 9 24 23; 165 23 24 39 38; 166 38 37 22 23; 167 37 38 53 52;
168 38 39 54 53; 169 53 54 69 68; 170 10 11 26 25; 171 11 12 27 26;
172 26 27 42 41; 173 41 40 25 26; 174 40 41 56 55; 175 41 42 57 56;
176 56 57 72 71; 177 13 14 29 28; 178 14 15 30 29; 179 29 30 45 44;
180 44 43 28 29; 181 43 44 59 58; 182 44 45 60 59; 183 59 60 75 74;
ELEMENT PROPERTY
156 TO 183 THICKNESS 0.15
DEFINE MATERIAL START
ISOTROPIC CONCRETE
E 2.17184e+007
POISSON 0.17
DENSITY 23.6158
ALPHA 5e-006 DAMP
0.05
TYPE CONCRETE STRENGTH
FCU 27578.9 END DEFINE
MATERIAL
MEMBER PROPERTY INDIAN
9 11 12 14 15 17 18 20 29 TO 40 49 TO 60 69 71 72 74 75 77 78 80 89 TO 99 -
100 PRIS YD 0.381 ZD 0.2286
10 13 16 19 70 73 76 79 PRIS YD 0.2286 ZD 0.381
1 TO 8 21 TO 28 41 TO 48 61 TO 68 81 TO 88 101 TO 148 PRIS YD 0.4572 ZD
0.2286
CONSTANTS
MATERIAL CONCRETE ALL
SUPPORTS
1 TO 3 16 TO 18 31 TO 33 46 TO 48 61 TO 63 FIXED
DEFINE 1893 ACCIDENTAL LOAD
ZONE 0.1 RF 5 I 1 SS 1 ST 1 DM 0.05
SELFWEIGHT 1 MEMBER
WEIGHT
1 TO 8 21 TO 28 41 TO 48 61 TO 68 81 TO 88 101 TO 148 UNI 15
FLOOR WEIGHT
YRANGE 0 12 FLOAD 3.75
DEFINE WIND LOAD TYPE 1
WIND 1
INT 4.9058 8.884 7.87 8.96 8.96 4.51 HEIGT 1.9 3.425 3.05 3.05 3.05 1.525
EXP 0.8 JOINT 1 TO 75
LOAD 1 LOADTYPE Seismic TITLE SL X1893
LOAD X 1
REVA/CE/2022-2024 2
Cost Analysis, Design, Modeling, and Visualization of G+3 and G+4 Buildings in
Virtual Reality using a Set of Civil Engineering Software
. PERFORM ANALYSIS
CHANGE
LOAD 2 LOADTYPE Seismic TITLE SL Z1893
LOAD Z 1
PERFORM ANALYSIS
CHANGE
LOAD 3 LOADTYPE Wind TITLE WLWIND
LOAD X 1 TYPE 1 YR 0 12.2
WIND LOAD X -1 TYPE 1 YR 0 12.2
WIND LOAD Z 1 TYPE 1 YR 0 12.2
WIND LOAD Z -1 TYPE 1 YR 0 12.2 LOAD 4
LOADTYPE Dead TITLE DLSELFWEIGHT Y -
1
MEMBER LOAD
1 TO 6 61 TO 66 101 103 104 106 107 109 113 115 116 118 119 121 125 TO 132 -
133 UNI GY -11.9
21 TO 26 41 TO 46 102 105 108 114 117 120 126 129 132 UNI GY -5.18
7 8 88 110 112 122 124 134 136 148 UNI GY -2.4
FLOOR LOAD
YRANGE 3.05 12.2 FLOAD -1 GY
MEMBER LOAD
81 83 85 87 137 140 143 146 UNI GY -16.4
LOAD 5 LOADTYPE Live TITLE LL FLOOR
LOAD
YRANGE 3.05 12.2 FLOAD -3.75 GY
LOAD COMB 6 GENERATED INDIAN CODE GENRAL_STRUCTURES 14 1.5
5 1.5
LOAD COMB 7 GENERATED INDIAN CODE GENRAL_STRUCTURES 24 1.2
5 1.2 3 1.2
LOAD COMB 8 GENERATED INDIAN CODE GENRAL_STRUCTURES 34 1.2
5 1.2 3 -1.2
LOAD COMB 9 GENERATED INDIAN CODE GENRAL_STRUCTURES 44 1.2
5 1.2 1 1.2
LOAD COMB 10 GENERATED INDIAN CODE GENRAL_STRUCTURES 54 1.2
5 1.2 2 1.2
LOAD COMB 11 GENERATED INDIAN CODE GENRAL_STRUCTURES 64 1.2
5 1.2 1 -1.2
LOAD COMB 12 GENERATED INDIAN CODE GENRAL_STRUCTURES 74 1.2
5 1.2 2 -1.2
LOAD COMB 13 GENERATED INDIAN CODE GENRAL_STRUCTURES 84 1.5
3 1.5
LOAD COMB 14 GENERATED INDIAN CODE GENRAL_STRUCTURES 94 1.5
3 -1.5
LOAD COMB 15 GENERATED INDIAN CODE GENRAL_STRUCTURES 104 1.5
1 1.5
LOAD COMB 16 GENERATED INDIAN CODE GENRAL_STRUCTURES 114 1.5
2 1.5
LOAD COMB 17 GENERATED INDIAN CODE GENRAL_STRUCTURES 124 1.5
1 -1.5
LOAD COMB 18 GENERATED INDIAN CODE GENRAL_STRUCTURES 13
REVA/CE/2022-2024 3
Cost Analysis, Design, Modeling, and Visualization of G+3 and G+4 Buildings in
Virtual Reality using a Set of Civil Engineering Software
. 4 1.5 2 -1.5
LOAD COMB 19 GENERATED INDIAN CODE GENRAL_STRUCTURES 14
4 0.9 1 1.5
LOAD COMB 20 GENERATED INDIAN CODE GENRAL_STRUCTURES 154 0.9
2 1.5
LOAD COMB 21 GENERATED INDIAN CODE GENRAL_STRUCTURES 164 0.9
1 -1.5
LOAD COMB 22 GENERATED INDIAN CODE GENRAL_STRUCTURES 174 0.9
2 -1.5
PERFORM ANALYSIS PRINT ALL
START CONCRETE DESIGN CODE
INDIAN
FC 25000 ALL
FYMAIN 415000 ALL
FYSEC 415000 ALL
MAXMAIN 16 ALL
MAXSEC 12 ALL
MINMAIN 12 ALL
MINSEC 10 ALL
RATIO 8 ALL
DESIGN BEAM 1 TO 8 21 TO 28 41 TO 48 61 TO 68 81 TO 88 101 TO 148
DESIGN COLUMN 9 TO 20 29 TO 40 49 TO 60 69 TO 80 89 TO 100
DESIGN ELEMENT 156 TO 183
CONCRETE TAKE
END CONCRETE DESIGN PERFORM
ANALYSIS PRINT ALLFINISH
REVA/CE/2022-2024 4
Cost Analysis, Design, Modeling, and Visualization of G+3 and G+4 Buildings in
Virtual Reality using a Set of Civil Engineering Software
.
APPENDIX-2
REVA/CE/2022-2024 5
Cost Analysis, Design, Modeling, and Visualization of G+3 and G+4 Buildings in
Virtual Reality using a Set of Civil Engineering Software
REVA/CE/2022-2024 6
Cost Analysis, Design, Modeling, and Visualization of G+3 and G+4 Buildings in
Virtual Reality using a Set of Civil Engineering Software
REVA/CE/2022-2024 7
Cost Analysis, Design, Modeling, and Visualization of G+3 and G+4 Buildings in
Virtual Reality using a Set of Civil Engineering Software
REVA/CE/2022-2024 8