The Pre Shakespearean: Drama The Literary Lighthouse
The Pre Shakespearean: Drama The Literary Lighthouse
The Pre Shakespearean: Drama The Literary Lighthouse
PRE-SHAKESPEAREAN DRAMA
The Elizabethan age is the golden age of the drama. While the influence of the
classics and of foreign countries is everywhere to be felt, the drama is truly
national, a true expression of the national genius, despite the various foreign
influences to which it was subjected. The drama was everywhere; performances
were given every night, and hence there was an amazing prodigality of
dramatic output. The variety and abundance of the dramatic output even
during the pre-Shakespearean period would be clearly brought out, if we briefly
consider the various types of drama that flourished during the age:
(1) there was the chronicle play based on events from national history and
witnessing the patriotism of the people.
(2) The domestic drama presents rather crude scenes from domestic life as in
Grammar Gurton's Needle. It developed into such plays as Shakespeare's
Taming of the Shrew.
(3) The courtly comedy intended for cultured and learned audiences and
dealing with the life of the court and the courtiers. Its chief features were witty
dialogues, jests and puns, rather than action. The appeal was to the intelligence
and imagination of scholarly audiences.
(4) The classical plays are based on the drama of ancient Greece and Rome.
(5) The melodrama which depended not upon plot or characterisation but on
sensation and thrills. There was a heaping up of sensational events.
(6) The revenge tragedy is full of bloody events.
(7) Farces full of clownage and appealing to the lower sections of the audience.
Dramatic Activity
The development of drama during the Age of Shakespeare was greatly
influenced by the establishment of the private and the public theaters. Towards
the end of the sixteenth century, dramatic activity was in full swing. The number
of audiences day by day. Hence, the idea of establishing permanent theaters
took shape. The first playhouse in London was erected in the year 1576 in
Shoreditch, well out of the reach of civic authorities. During the next thirty years
at least seven regular theaters and a dozen or more innyards, permanently
fitted for performances, were established in the city of London and its
immediate suburbs. The Theatre, the Rose, the Globe, the Swan, the Fortune
were built in the Shoreditch area or on the Bankside. The Blackfriars was the
only theater within the city.
Theaters were of two kinds. First, the private theaters, which were roofed in and
lit by artificial light, were attended by a better class audience. Blackfriars,
Salisbury Court and Drury Lane were famous private theaters. Secondly, the
public theaters were open to the sky and performances took place in broad
daylight. All classes of contemporary society intermingled in yards or galleries.
The whole idea of these early theaters was like that of the Roman amphitheater.
These theaters were round or octagonal, with a stage set in the middle of a
The main stage was open, with a curtain at the back and two or more doors
through which the actors entered. The groundlings surrounded the platform, but
gallants able to pay for the privilege sat on the stage itself. Two important
consequences resulted from this. First, no scenery could be introduced on the
main stage. Primitive scenic effects were created with the help of movable
properties; for example, a tree in the tub might symbolize a forest. The absence
of scenery necessitated the introduction of a large amount of explanatory
reference. The audiences had to be told it was dark, a hall or a garden, and to
this we owe a great deal of sheer poetry and the late sixteenth century and
early seventeenth century drama. As the audiences surrounded the stage and
the actors, there was close intimacy between the two. It resulted in the
introduction of the device of soliloquy and aside. The audiences believed in
superstitions and were fond of thrilling actions. So, Elizabethan plays abound in
superstitions, ghosts, witches and fairies, blood curdling scenes of murder and
bloodshed, and revenge. In these plays female parts were taken up by boy
actors, who evidently were more distressing than the crude scenery.
The university wits —Kyd, Nash, Lyly, Peele, Greene and Marlowe—completely
revolutionized English drama and made it a suitable medium for the expression
of the genius and temperament of their age. They brought the English drama to
a point where Shakespeare began to experiment upon it. Let us now consider
the contribution of the university wits to the remarkable development of British
drama.