Lab 2-3 - Analysis
Lab 2-3 - Analysis
Purpose: In this lab you will investigate physical properties of solids to characterize and understand the
forces of attraction between atoms and between molecules.
Analysis:
Part 1: Of the three types of solids (molecular polar, molecular non-polar, ionic) which is held together
the strongest? Which is held together the weakest?
Claim: Of the three solids, ionic holds the strongest forces, and nonpolar
A claim is a statement that solids have the weakest.
answers the question. It will
usually only be one sentence in
length.
Reasoning: This means that sodium chloride has the highest melting point
The reasoning is the explanation because it’s an ionic solid which we know because the
of “why and how” the evidence electronegativity between sodium and chloride is 2.1which
supports the claim and should makes it ionic due to the large difference between
include an explanation of the electronegativities. This makes the giving of electrons possible
underlying scientific concept that since sodium wants to lose an electron and chloride wants to gain
produced the evidence or data. one. The complete transfer of electrons are stronger than covalent
bonds because they completely transfer electrons adverse to
dipoles attracting the ends of another dipole.
1. Complete the table based on the chemical models and the data from the lab.
2. Using data from the lab, rank the solids according to strength of attractive force.
3. Using information from the table above, correlate the rankings from question #2 to the type of
attractive force and type of substance.
Part 2: Consider the following 3D model for trifluoroacetic acid. Do you predict trifluoroacetic acid to
be soluble in water or hexane?
Reasoning: \Different outer atoms cause polarity because the electrons move
The reasoning is the explanation towards the most electronegative particle, in this case it’s oxygen.
of “why and how” the evidence
supports the claim and should The molecule being polar is so important because the relation
include an explanation of the between solvent and solute is that a like solute will dissolve a like
underlying scientific concept that solvent. This is referring to polarity.
produced the evidence or data.
Trifluoroacetic acid is soluble in water because of the idea that
**You must talk about the like dissolves like. Since the molecule is deduced to be polar
different types of interactions because of the different outer atoms, it would also be dissolvable
between solute and solvent in water, which is also a polar substance.
molecules in your reasoning.
1. Complete the following table based on the chemical models of each substance
Relative strength of
force(s) between
particles in a pure
sample
2. Consider a collection of magnets and a collection of marbles, if the magnets and marbles are
mixed together in one bowl, what do you expect to happen? Why?
3. Considering your solubility data from the lab, when something dissolves, how does the relative
strength of the attractive force between particles in the solvent compare to that in the solute?
4. Considering your solubility data from the lab, when something does not dissolve, how does the
relative strength of the attractive force between particles in the solvent compare to that in the
solute?
5. How do your answers to questions #3 and #4 relate to the scenario with magnets and marbles
(question #2)?
6. As matter can neither be created or destroyed, what do you think happens to the solid when it
dissolves and is no longer visible as a solid? In other words, why does the solid disappear when it
dissolves?
7. Looking at the 3D model for trifluoroacetic acid, do you expect the molecule to be polar or
nonpolar?
8. Given your answer to 7, with which of the solvents- water or hexane- would you expect the
trifluoroacetic acid molecules to interact? Via what type of interaction?