CRI415-LESSON 18

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 2

1.

TESTIMONIAL KNOWLEDGE

SEC. 36. TESTIMONY GENERALLY CONFINED TO PERSONAL


KNOWLEDGE; HEARSAY EXCLUDED.

1. Testimonial Knowledge Rule/ Hearsay Rule- a witness may testify only those
facts which he knows of his own knowledge, that is, which are derived from his
own perception through his organ of sense. OR TESTIMONIAL KNOWLEDGE
RULE- THAT TESTIMONY WITNESS IS GENERALLY CONFINED TO
HIS/HER PERSONAL KNOWLEDGE OF FACTS. It is also called SECOND
HAND EVIDENCE.
2. Oral evidence of a witness not based on personal knowledge is considered as
HEARSAY.
3. It not necessary that the witness knowledge of facts to which he testifies should
have been obtained in any particular manner, and he may testify to what he
hears, feels, tastes, smells or sees.
Examples of written hearsay evidence are:
1. A medical certificate issued by a doctor who was not called to testify;
2. An affidavit of an accused implicating another in the commission of an
offense where the accused is not placed on the witness stand;
3. A newspaper clipping, a letter and a telegram to show the death of an
insured in an action on the life insurance policy.
Examples of oral hearsay evidence are:
1. The testimony of a mother that the alleged father of her heirs, read to
her a document wherein he acknowledge her son as his- hearsay
because the father is still alive but if the father is already dead it is
admitted as exception to the hearsay-declaration about pedigree;
2. To show his innocence, the testimony of an accused that the third person
had confessed to the crime; and
3. Testimony of a witness to a highway accident that the driver told him that
the automobile belonged to the defendant.(Evidence in action by
Pronove)
4. Doctrine of Independent Relevant Statement or tenor statement rule- when the
testimony is presented to established not the truth but the tenor of the statement
of the fact that the statement was made, it is not hearsay.
5. It is when a statement is presented for the purpose of proving the truth of the
facts asserted therein, it is hearsay and inadmissible;

Example: a witness in a slander case testified that he heard Juana say that Pedro
was a thief, it will not be admitted being hearsay. But if the testimony is presented to
prove that Juana uttered those words, regardless of whether her statement is true or
false, the testimony is admissible

You might also like