Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering

Rubrics used for evaluation assignments:

Quality of Assignment and its relevance to Cos
Assignments are given to the students so as to improve their intelligent quotient, self
learning and logical thinking. Student has to answer the assignment by applying knowledge
on engineering sciences, recent trends and contemporary issues.
Assignment kindles their out of box thinking, which helps the students to attain certain
COs, POs and PSOs.
Criteria LOW MEDIUM HIGH
The Student
Able to analyze
Minimal ability to demonstrates a
Analytical Skills the
analyze the given task moderate level of the
given task
subject knowledge
The content is quite The content is The content is
Writing Skills
relevant to the given relevant highly relevant to
a) Content
task. to the given task. the given task
The organization of The organization of The organization
the paper is weak and the of
b) Organization support is paper is good and the paper is well
insubstantial or generally supported supported with
unconvincing with little evidence evidence
Sentences are
somewhat varied, and Sentences are
Sentences are
c) Language some are correctly
correctly
inappropriate with Constructed and
Constructed
minimal grammatical well articulated
errors
The Student The Student
The Student demonstrates a demonstrates
d)Knowledge Skills demonstrates a sufficient level of the sound
and Creative idea moderate level of the
subject knowledge subject knowledge
subject knowledgewith some creative with a creative
idea idea
Table 1: Rubrics used for evaluation assignments
In order to bridge the gap in the curriculum, students are given assignments beyond the
syllabus.
The following types of assignments are given to the students to make them attain the
Course outcomes of the programme.
 Library Assignment on latest Trends.
 Practice based
 Problem oriented

Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering

The rubrics for project evaluation are furnished below

Review Weightag
Agenda Assessment Overall
No. e
(a)Internal Evaluation
1 Project Proposal Evaluation Rubric 1 5
2 Mid Term Project Evaluation Rubric 2 5
End Semester Internal
3 Rubric 3 20 65
Project Evaluation
4 Project Report Evaluation Rubric 4 20
5 Evaluation by guide Rubric 5 15
(b)External Evaluation
1 Report submission 15
35
2 Viva-voce 20
Total Marks 100
Table 1: Rubrics for Project Evaluation
Rubrics for project evaluation in the review of project are furnished in the table
below
Zeroth & First Review
Rubric -1 & 2
Project Proposal Evaluation & Mid Semester Project work Evaluation
Level of Achievement
Acceptable (2) Average (3) Good (5)
Identification of Minimal explanation Average explanation Good and detailed
problem Domain of the purpose and of the purpose and explanation of the
and Detailed need of the project need of the project purpose and need of
Analysis the project
Explanation of the Moderate study of Detailed explanation
specifications and the of the specifications
Proposed Project
limitation of the existing system, and good study of
existing system not collects some basic the
up to the level information existing system
Objectives and Only Some To the objectives Proposed work are
Methodology of the objectives proposed; well defined,
Proposed work of the proposed Methodologies are Methodology to be
work mentioned but followed to solve the
are well defined; unclear; without defined problem are
Methodology to be justification to clearly specified
followed to solve the objectives
 defined problem are
not specified
properly

Table 2: Rubrics for Project Evaluation for Zeroth & First Review

Second & Third Review

Rubric 3 & 4
End Semester Internal Project Evaluation & Project Report Evaluation
Level of Achievement
Acceptable (10) Average (15) Good (20)
Appropriate design Appropriate design
Design Appropriate design
methodology methodology
Methodology methodology not
partially properly
defined properly
justified justified
Planning of Time frame not
Specified time frame Specified time frame
Project Work & Specified and
without appropriate with appropriate
Report without Project
Project Report Project Report
Report
Table 3: Rubrics for Project Evaluation for Second & Third Review
Model Review with Demonstration
Rubric 5
Evaluation by guide
Level of Achievement
Acceptable (5) Average (7.5) Good (15)
Project report is in Project report is in
Project report is in
specified format with specified format.
Project specified format with some
some mistake. References are
Report mistake
References appropriate. Project
References are not
are appropriate. Project work must be
appropriate
work may be Published published
Complete
Complete explanation of
Explanation of key explanation
key concepts
concepts are not proper of key concepts
Demonstration Description of in
Description of in sufficient - Good description of
sufficient
technical requirements of technical
- technical requirements
the project requirements
of the project
of the project
Conclusion Results are presented in Results are presented in Results are
 presented
partial manner partial manner
and in good manner
Project work is Project work is
Discussion Project work is well
summarized without summarized and
summarized and
proper conclusion concluded
concluded well

Table 4:Rubrics for Project Evaluation for Model Review with Demonstration

Process to assess individual and team performance

The assessment of the performance on individual and team are carried as per the
parameters given below.
 Innovation & creativity of the project
 Review of literature & related studies about the project
 Implementation methodologies
 Presentation skills
 Answer for the Queries

S.No Performance Indicator Marks

1 Quality 20

2 20
State of art technology
3 Relevance to industry and academics 20

The use and development of theoretical and experimental

4 20
method

5 The coverage of border area of the program. 20

Total 100

Table 5: Process to assess individual and team performance