GROUP_ASSIGNMENT_RMA_302[1]

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 3

GROUP ASSIGNMENT RMA 302

HUMAN RIGHTS AND CIVIL LIBERTIES

In many cases of counterterrorism, it is highly unlikely for human rights to be respected, this is
because, as much as protecting and respecting human rights is important some of the
counterterrorism measures put in place still risk violating these said rights. Focusing too much on
counterterrorism could possibly result in resentment and or even fuel extremism in turn countering
the agenda being sought.

In order to achieve the perfect balance; international cooperation and transparency is a major
factor. The balance between counterterrorism and protecting human rights involves navigating the
two areas with utmost delicacy and keenness. This will ensure that both agendas are met without
having to greatly compromise either.

The allegations of abuse or violations in counterterrorism efforts can vary widely, and specific cases
may involve complex, legal and ethical issues. Some examples are Surveillance and Privacy
Violations; the masses are concerned that surveillance programs can easily infringe on individuals'
privacy rights without proper oversight. Another one is the infringement on Freedom of Expression;
this is when allegations of suppressing dissent, restricting freedom of speech, or targeting individuals
based on their political beliefs are used as a “security measure”.

INTERNATIONAL SUPPORT AND COOPERATION

International organizations play a pivotal role in addressing terrorism by fostering cooperation


among nations, sharing intelligence, and establishing frameworks for coordinated action. Entities
such as the United Nations (UN), Interpol, and the European Union (EU) contribute to the global
counterterrorism effort. The UN, through its various bodies like the Security Council and specialized
agencies, facilitates the development of international legal instruments, conventions, and
resolutions to combat terrorism. Interpol acts as a central hub for law enforcement agencies
worldwide, facilitating information exchange and collaborative investigations. The EU employs a
comprehensive approach, integrating security, legal, and social measures to address the root causes
of terrorism. These organizations provide platforms for dialogue, capacity-building, and resource-
sharing, fostering a collective response to the transnational nature of terrorism. Challenges persist,
including differing national interests and legal frameworks, but the involvement of international
organizations remains crucial for building a unified and effective global response to the multifaceted
threat of terrorism.

Diplomatic efforts and cooperation among neighbouring countries are essential for addressing
shared challenges, including terrorism. Diplomatic channels provide a platform for dialogue, conflict
resolution, and the development of joint strategies to combat terrorism collaboratively.
Neighbouring countries often engage in information-sharing, intelligence cooperation, and joint law
enforcement operations to counter cross-border terrorist activities. Bilateral and multilateral
agreements, such as extradition treaties and regional security pacts, enhance coordination and
facilitate the pursuit of individuals involved in terrorism. Additionally, diplomatic engagement fosters
trust, reduces misunderstandings, and promotes stability in the region. While historical tensions may
pose challenges, ongoing diplomatic efforts play a crucial role in building a united front against the
complex and evolving threat of terrorism.

CASE STUDIES
All counterterrorism strategies vary in their effectiveness, and success is often context-dependent.
Here are two examples of the success and effectiveness that we looked into

United States and the Global Coalition Against ISIS (2014-2019):

 Successes: The coalition effectively combined military, intelligence, and diplomatic efforts to
weaken and ultimately defeat ISIS. Key achievements included reclaiming territory,
disrupting financial networks, and eliminating key leaders.

 Factors contributing to success: International collaboration, effective intelligence-sharing,


and a multi-dimensional approach combining military force with diplomatic and economic
measures.

U.S. Invasion of Iraq (2003):

 Failures: The invasion did not eliminate terrorism and, in fact, contributed to the rise of new
extremist groups, such as ISIS. It also strained international relations and fuelled anti-
Western sentiments.
 Factors contributing to failure: Lack of international support, inadequate post-invasion
planning, and insufficient understanding of the regional dynamics.

Successful counterterrorism requires a holistic approach that combines military, diplomatic, and
socio-economic measures. Political solutions, international collaboration, and addressing root causes
are critical. Military-centric strategies without broader contextual understanding can worsen
conflicts.

Some potential practices to move forward with can be to emphasize international cooperation,
employ multifaceted strategies addressing the root causes of terrorism, engage in political
negotiations, and ensure post-conflict planning. By balancing military force with diplomacy,
intelligence-sharing, and social programs we may be able to build lasting stability. Human rights
considerations are also vital to prevent radicalization and minimize civilian harm.

FUTURE RECOMMENDATIONS

Predicting the future trajectory of terrorism in Central Africa involves numerous uncertainties, but
certain trends and factors may influence the region. Persistent challenges such as weak governance,
socio-economic disparities, and ethnic tensions may contribute to the continued presence of
terrorist groups.

Emerging technologies may play a dual role. While advancements in surveillance and intelligence
could aid counterterrorism efforts, the exploitation of technology by terrorists for recruitment and
coordination remains a concern.

Political instability and unresolved conflicts, such as those in the Democratic Republic of Congo and
the Central African Republic, may create power vacuums exploited by extremist groups. Additionally,
spill over effects from neighbouring regions, like the Sahel, could further complicate the security
landscape.

Efforts to address root causes, promote good governance, and invest in socio-economic
development will be essential for long-term stability. International organizations, governments, and
local communities must work collaboratively to build resilience, enhance security capabilities, and
foster inclusive societies to mitigate the future trajectory of terrorism in Central Africa.
CONCLUSION

You might also like