DILG CONCISE ILLUSTRATIVE GUIDE FOR

THE PREPARATION, REVIEW, MONITORING

AND UPDATING OF THE COMPREHENSIVE
DEVELOPMENT PLAN (CDP)
AND
LOCAL DEVELOPMENT INVESTMENT
PROGRAM (LDIP)

W
E

S
 DILG CONCISE ILLUSTRATIVE GUIDE FOR THE
PREPARATION, REVIEW, MONITORING AND UPDATING
OF THE COMPREHENSIVE DEVELOPMENT PLAN (CDP)
and
LOCAL DEVELOPMENT INVESTMENT PROGRAM (LDIP)

This Manual was developed with

support from the European union

Under the project

“Support to the local Government Units
for more effective and accountable
Public Financial Management
(LGU PFM 2 project)”
 65
Review
Process
CDP & LDIP
W
N

38
S

Forms
CDP & LDIP
E

35
Process
Planning
Integrated
LD

A
IP

R
Up
da Ra
tin t io
g na
p3 le
2

3
Guide

p1
About the

I
CHAP

CHAP

XI
Sy
nc
4

hr Th
Policy

a De e C
Issuances

(S n on ve om
LP d ize lo p
BC Bu d pm re
Re dg Loc e n he
vi etin al t P nsi
se g P
d l la ve
n
20 Ca ann (C
16 len ing DP
) da )
p3 r
II
CHAP

0 C
p6

X
CHAP
St DP
O e
A ROADMAP
CDP & LDIP ILLUSTRATIVE GUIDE

rg p
-L
an 1 DI
iz P
e
an p Pr
CD d 9 e
P M p
 P M pa
CD ob
-L ili ra
P Re ze tio
th
vis DI
i P e n
an
d tE Pl
L xi Pr an
sti S ep ni
Pr DIP ng te
a ng
an Pl p Te
d
oc R an 2 ra am
es ev Se V s a ti
s ie cto isio nd p on
ra n, R 1
p2 w l M e 1 O v
8 bj iss iew
ec io
tiv n
es

CHAP

III

CHAP
CHAP

IV

IX
C
St DP
P e -L
St repa p
ru r 3 DI
ctu e 1
r e Ec 3
P
d o P re
Lis logi
t o ca pa
fP lP ra
PA rof
s ile tio
an n
d

CHAP
CHAP
CHAP
CHAP

VI

VII

VIII
C C h T Ra
P D P D In e L Da tio
Au repa P - (LD repa P - ve o
th re L IP re L ta na
or N D ) t h D stm ca
ity e I
e
Le de PP e IP
Lo
l Se liz
ve d ca P en De t ( ed
rs Im re l D re t P ve Ra P
pl p ev p
em a
r el
o
a r
ro lop PI lan
en a pm a gr m DS n
ta ti
tio o e t
nt on i am en ) ing
n n I n
In S ve S
p1 In
s t (LD t
str te
um p tm p e IP 7 dic
en 5 en
tP 4 ) a to
ts ro r
an p gr p p1
d am 2 9
25 2
Contents

Message from the Secretary ............................................................................... viii

Message from the Undersecretary ....................................................................... ix

Rationale ..................................................................................................................1

About the Guide .......................................................................................................2

Policy Issuances ......................................................................................................4

Chapter I. The Comprehensive Development Plan (CDP) ...................................6

Chapter II. CDP - LDIP Preparation Step 1 ...........................................................9

Organize and Mobilize the Planning Team

Chapter III. CDP - LDIP Preparation Step 2 ........................................................11

Revisit Existing Plans and Review Vision, Mission and Sectoral Objectives

Chapter IV. CDP - LDIP Preparation Step 3 ........................................................13

Prepare Ecological Profile and Structured List of PPAs

Chapter V. RATIONALIZED PLANNING INDICATOR DATA SET (RaPIDS) .......17

Chapter VI. THE LOCAL DEVELOPMENT INVESTMENT PROGRAM (LDIP) ....19

Chapter VII. CDP - LDIP Preparation Step 4 .......................................................22

Prepare the Local Development Investment Program (LDIP)

Chapter VIII. CDP - LDIP Preparation Step 5 ......................................................25

Prepare Needed Implementation Instruments and Authority Levers

Chapter IX. CDP AND LDIP REVIEW PROCESS .................................................28

Chapter X. SYNCHRONIZED LOCAL PLANNING AND BUDGETING

CALENDAR (SLPBC REVISED 2016) ....................................................................30

Chapter XI. LDIP UPDATING ................................................................................33

Figures

Table I. CLUP vs. CDP.............................................................................................7

Figure I. Relationship of Plans ...............................................................................8

Table II. NGA Mandated/Prescribed Sectoral and Thematic Plans ..................12

Figure II. The Enhanced Comprehensive Development Planning Cycle ..........14

Figure III. ................................................................................................................14

Figure IV. “Readily Useable” Ecological Profile and LDI Matrix .......................15

Figure V. LDIS VS. RAPIDS ...................................................................................15

Figure VI. The Structured List Of PPAs ...............................................................16

Figure VII. The Structured List Of PPAs as an Output Document ....................16

Figure VIII. RaPIDS Screenshot............................................................................17

Figure IX. RaPIDS Indicator Composition ...........................................................18

Figure X. Funds Available For Development Investment ...................................19

Figure XI. The LDIP As An Output Document .....................................................20

Figure XII. LDIP Streams.......................................................................................24

Figure XIII. Implementation Instruments As Output Documents ......................27

Figure XIV. CDP-LDIP Review Process ...............................................................28

Figure XV. LDIP Updating .....................................................................................33

Annex ......................................................................................................................34

A. INTEGRATED PLANNING PROCESS WITH LOCAL SPECIAL BODIES

AND ADVISORY COUNCILS .........................................................................35
B. CDIP AND LDIP FORMS ................................................................................38
C. CDP AND LDIP REVIEW PROCESS .............................................................65
DILG CONCISE ILLUSTRATIVE GUIDE FOR THE PREPARATION, REVIEW, MONITORING AND UPDATING OF THE CDP & LDIP

Message from the Secretary

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipisicing elit, sed do eiusmod
tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim
veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea
commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate
velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat
cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id
est laborum.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipisicing elit, sed do eiusmod
tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim
veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea
commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate
velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat
cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id
est laborum.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipisicing elit, sed do eiusmod
tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim
veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea
commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate
velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat
cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id
est laborum.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipisicing elit, sed do eiusmod
tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim
veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea
commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate
velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat
cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id
est laborum.

viii
 CDP-LDIP PREP GUIDE

Message from the

Undersecretary
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipisicing elit, sed do eiusmod
tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim
veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea
commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate
velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat
cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id
est laborum.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipisicing elit, sed do eiusmod
tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim
veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea
commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate
velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat
cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id
est laborum.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipisicing elit, sed do eiusmod
tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim
veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea
commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate
velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat
cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id
est laborum.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipisicing elit, sed do eiusmod
tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim
veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea
commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate
velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat
cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id
est laborum.

ix
DILG CONCISE ILLUSTRATIVE GUIDE FOR THE PREPARATION, REVIEW, MONITORING AND UPDATING OF THE CDP & LDIP

x
 CDP-LDIP PREP GUIDE

Rationale
Low LGU interest in preparing the CDP
CDPs formulated as of 2015 is only at 48.71% nationwide while multiplicity
of sectoral plans at the local level is still prevailing. Countless resources and
efforts have been put into separate planning processes just to comply with
the 33 NGA prescribed plans. There is a need to harmonize these plans
while encouraging LGUs to comply with their mandates.

48+52+Y
48.71%
Local planners are intimidated by the highly technical CDP Guidebook
The CDP Guide is a very good technical document but local planners
specially those who are relatively new find it difficult to digest its content
or to even start reading its pages. There needs to be a simpler guide that
will present the process in a manner not so intimidating.

Recent statutes require the mainstreaming of thematic and sectoral

concerns in the CDP
RA 10121 and RA 9729 are one of the many laws and policies that require
the mainstreaming of specific thematic concerns in the CDP. There is a need
to provide guidelines for mainstreaming these and other future thematic
concerns in the CDP. The DILG-BLGD identified entry points and came up
with the mainstreaming framework to your right. This framework needs to
be operationalized.

This Illustrative Guide aims to encourage more LGUs to prepare the

CDP and LDIP as well as assist them in mainstreaming thematic and
sectoral concerns in the local development planning process.

1
DILG CONCISE ILLUSTRATIVE GUIDE FOR THE PREPARATION, REVIEW, MONITORING AND UPDATING OF THE CDP & LDIP

About the Guide

This illustrative guide is part of the enhancement to the CDP guidebook.
The Illustrative Guide is one of the enhancements to the CDP Guide enrolled
under the “Support to Local Government Units for More Effective and
Accountable Public Financial Management” Project funded by the
European Union. Aside from the Quick Guide, a supplemental Guide to
the Rationalized Planning Indicator and Data Set (RaPIDS), a policy
paper on CDP-BuB Process integration and a Guide for the conduct of
the CDP Review were also enrolled under the project mainly to address
current challenges in the local planning system.

The DILG Concise and Illustrative Guide for the Preparation, Review,
Monitoring and Updating of the Comprehensive Development Plan (CDP)
and the Local Development Investment Program (LDIP), the CDP-LDIP
Illustrative Guide for brevity, is:
• A detailed summary of the key steps for the preparation and subsequent
annual and mid-term updating of the CDP and LDIP;
• A toolkit for the review of the form, process and content of the CDP and
LDIP for the purpose of enhancing the relevance and responsiveness
of the CDP and LDIP to local needs and to strengthen alignment and
complementation with Provincial and National-level plans;
• An update to the CDP Guidebook covering changes in policies and
agreements with other Oversight Agencies (e.g., relationship to the
Budget Operations Manual) as manifested by executive issuances after
2010;
• A primer for members of the technical planning team and the Local
Development Council (LDC) who may not have or have little planning
background to enable them to participate actively and substantially in
the preparation of the CDP and LDIP;
• An advisory for plan monitoring and updating; and
• A process, output and documentary checklist for the city and municipal
planner to aid him/her in advising the Local Development Council and
2
 CDP-LDIP PREP GUIDE

the technical planning team and to direct him/her to the appropriate

key reference materials required for the detailed preparation of the
CDP and LDIP. These reference materials are:
◉ Rationalized Planning System Guidebook (RPS);
◉ Comprehensive Development Plan Guidebook;
◉ Guide to Ecological Profiling; and
◉ Rationalized Planning Indicators and Data Set (RaPIDS) Manual.

The illustrative guide may be clustered into three parts.

The first two major steps of the CDP-LDIP Illustrative Guide are mainly
1.) Preparatory activities for the actual planning process. The third step
primarily discusses 2.) Planning process. The fourth and fifth step are
discussions on the different 3.) Authority levers and implementation
instruments to aid in the implementation of the PPAs and to complete
the planning cycle. These include the Investment Programming, CAPDEV
agenda, Legislative requirements and M&E strategy.

The output documents in the illustrative guide

The output documents in the CDP-LDIP Illustrative Guide is consistent
with those that will be used in the CDP Review Guide Tool. These
documents will serve as the basis in reviewing if the CDP was prepared
as prescribed by pertinent policies and other issuances on mainstreaming
sectoral and thematic concerns.

3
DILG CONCISE ILLUSTRATIVE GUIDE FOR THE PREPARATION, REVIEW, MONITORING AND UPDATING OF THE CDP & LDIP

Policy Issuances
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipisicing elit, sed do eiusmod
tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim
veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea
commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate
velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat
cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id
est laborum.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipisicing elit, sed do eiusmod
tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim
veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea
commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate
velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat
cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id
est laborum.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipisicing elit, sed do eiusmod
tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim
veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea
commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate
velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat
cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id
est laborum.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipisicing elit, sed do eiusmod
tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim
veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea
commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate
velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat
cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id
est laborum.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipisicing elit, sed do eiusmod
tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim
veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea
commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate

4
 CDP-LDIP PREP GUIDE

velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat
cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id
est laborum.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipisicing elit, sed do eiusmod
tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim
veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea
commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate
velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat
cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id
est laborum.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipisicing elit, sed do eiusmod
tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim
veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea
commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate
velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat
cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id
est laborum.

5
DILG CONCISE ILLUSTRATIVE GUIDE FOR THE PREPARATION, REVIEW, MONITORING AND UPDATING OF THE CDP & LDIP

Chapter

The Comprehensive Development

Plan (CDP) I

T
he Comprehensive Land Use Plan (CLUP) and the Comprehensive Development
Plan (CDP) are distinct and separate.
The term “comprehensive” in the CLUP is understood in its geographical,
territorial sense, while the term “comprehensive” in the CDP has to be understood in the
sense of “multi-sectoral” development. Yet, the two plans are intimately related.
The CLUP can well be regarded as the plan for the long-term management of the local
territory. As the skeletal-circulatory framework of the territory’s physical development,
it identifies areas where development can and cannot be located and directs public and
private investments accordingly. The CDP, on the other hand, is the action plan utilized
by every local administration to develop and implement priority sectoral and cross-
sectoral programs and projects in the proper locations to put flesh on the skeleton as
it were, gradually and incrementally, until the desired shape or form of development is
eventually attained over the long term. This is consistent with the definition of planning
as “public control of the pattern of development”.

CLUP

CDP ELA
6
 CDP-LDIP PREP GUIDE

Table I. CLUP vs. CDP

CLUP CDP
9 years 6 years
Spatial Sectoral
"Comprehensive" encompassing territorial "Comprehensive" embracing all development
jurisdiction between land and water sectors and sub-sectors and concerns of each
Defines the policy direction for the use of Outlines specific application of the available
land resources within territorial jurisdiction land resources
Accounts for available supply of land Demand for land resources based on sectoral
resources development goals
Has four (4) policy areas: production Covers 5 development sectors: social,
settlements, protection and infrastructure economic, physical, environmental,
institutional
Diagrams the desired physical pattern of Provide convergence mechanism to integrate
growth of the locality NGA's plans with local plans
Invariably takes a long time to carry out Short timeframe and should be used as a
medium to implement the CLUP
Local equivalent or counterpart of the Must coincide with the MTPDP/MTPIP
NIRIPPFP

O
ne thing that bolsters the interpretation that the CLUP and CDP are distinct
and separate is the fact that the responsibility for each plan is given to separate
bodies in the LGU. The CLUP is assigned to the Sanggunian as provided
for in Sections 447, 458 and 468 (Powers, Duties, Functions and Compensation of
the Sangguniang Bayan, Panlungsod and Panlalawigan, respectively) of the Local
Government Code; whereas the CDP is the responsibility of the LDC as provided
for under Sections 106 (Local Development Councils) and 109 (Functions of Local
Development Councils) of the Code. The Code has correctly assigned responsibility
for the CLUP to the Sanggunian considering that most if not all of the instruments
for implementing the CLUP involve regulating the use of lands that are mainly
privately held and this requires the exercise of the political powers of the LGU
through legislative action by the Sanggunian.
A common concern often raised by local planners is how to keep the long-term
plan from being thrown away with every change in administration. The answer to
this concern lies precisely in having a separate CLUP from a CDP. It is the “people’s
plan”. The CLUP, once enacted into a zoning ordinance (Sec. 20, c), becomes a law. It
remains in effect even after the incumbent officials have been replaced. Being a law,
the CLUP-turned Zoning Ordinance cannot be simply “thrown away” without going
through the proper legislative procedures for repealing or amending an ordinance.
The truth of the matter is, the long-term CLUP, once in place, can no longer be
claimed by, nor attributed to a particular administration. Rather, the CLUP belongs
to the people.

7
DILG CONCISE ILLUSTRATIVE GUIDE FOR THE PREPARATION, REVIEW, MONITORING AND UPDATING OF THE CDP & LDIP

W
ith the CLUP separated from the CDP, the review process by the Provincial Land Use
Committee (PLUC) is also immensely simplified. The Code requires a review by the provincial
government of the CLUP, not the CDP, of component cities and municipalities [see Sec. 468
(a)].
The Executive and Legislative Agenda (ELA) on the other hand is a planning document, covering a
3-year period corresponding to the term of local elective officials that is mutually developed and agreed
upon by both the executive and legislative departments of an LGU. The ELA is not meant to replace or
duplicate existing planning systems in LGUs. Rather, it adds greater value to the CLUP and the CDP by
moving them forward to getting implemented and monitored.
It is the CDP-based Executive and Legislative Agenda (ELA) that is associated with a particular
administration.

Comprehensive Land Use Plan

Long-Term Framework Plan Settlements Protection Protection Infrastructure
Policies Policies Policies Policies

Zoning Ordinance Other Regulatory Measures

Comprehensive Land Use Plan

Multi-year, Multi-sectoral
Environmental
Development Plan Social Economic
Management
Infrasrtucture Institutional

Term-based Agenda Executive & Legislative Agenda

Local Development Legislative Support

Investment Program Measures
Implementation Instruments
Annual Investment Annual/Supplemental
Program Budget

• Improved Public Services • Increased Private Sector

Outputs • New or Improved Public Facilities/Infrastructure Investment in Local Economic &
• Inccreased Public Awareness & Participation Social Development

• Change in Economic & Social Well-Being of Residents

Outcomes • Change in Configuration & Quality of the Physical Environment
• Change in Local Institutional Capacities

Figure I. Relationship of Plans

An illustration of the relationship of the CLUP
with the CDP, ELA and other implementation
instruments
(Source: CDP guidebook, chart designed by Prof.
Ernesto Serote)

8
 CDP-LDIP PREP GUIDE

Chapter

II CDP - LDIP Preparation Step 1

Organize and Mobilize the Planning Team

Major Activities Helpful Tips

T
1. Select members of the planning team. he first step in CDP preparation will lay
down the foundation for the succeeding
2. Prepare the Executive Order. steps. The composition of the
3. Orient the members of the Planning team planning team will dictate the inclusiveness,
on their roles and responsibilities. comprehensiveness and ownership of the
CDP. It is not necessary for LGU Department
4. Prepare and adopt a work and financial Heads to be members. Knowledgeable
plan for the updating of the CDP. technical staff will be sufficient. Be guided by
the prescribed core planning team in the CDP
Guide.
It is very important that the commitment of
Indicative Dates every member of the planning team is ensured
thru an Executive Order with a corresponding

1st to 2nd Week

work and financial plan. The team should
be organized and mobilized to take on the
required task in the preparation of the CDP.

of January 2016

Lead Office/Persons

• C/MPDC with the assistance of C/ ROLES OF C/MLGOO:

MLGOO
1. Assist the C/MPDC in the identification of
ROLES OF C/MPDC: the members of the core planning team.
1. Identify members of the core planning team 2. Assist the C/MPDC in the orientation of
based on the five development sectors. the Planning team.
2. Orient the members of the planning team 3. Facilitate the preparation and approval of
on their responsibilities. executive order.
3. Prepare the Executive Order and Work
Plan for the approval of the LCE.

9
DILG CONCISE ILLUSTRATIVE GUIDE FOR THE PREPARATION, REVIEW, MONITORING AND UPDATING OF THE CDP & LDIP

Mainstreaming Entry Point Output Documents

Make sure to include in the planning structure • Executive Order creating the Planning
sectoral committees that advocate for specific Team
thematic concerns so that their concerns are
properly represented and addressed: • Approved Work and Financial Plan for the
preparation of the CDP
• CCA/DRR (MENRO, LDRRMO, CSOs/
POs)
• Persons with Disability, Children, Senior
Citizens, Women (DSWD, OSCA, GFPS,
etc.) References

• ICCs/IPs Communities
CDP Guide Chapter I
• Representatives of LSBs and Local
Advisory Councils (See Annex A)

10
 CDP-LDIP PREP GUIDE

Chapter
CDP - LDIP Preparation Step 2
III Revisit Existing Plans and Review Vision, Mission
and Sectoral Objectives

Major Activities Indicative Dates

1. Inventory existing local plans (CLUP, CDP,

ELA, LDRRMP, GPB, FLUP, etc.) and 3rd to 4th Week
higher level plans such as PDPFP.
2. Review the Vision, Mission, Goals and of January 2016
Objectives of all existing plans for relevance
and applicability to the prevailing situation
and new mandates.
Output Documents
3. Check if the plans are aligned with each
other and the PDPFP.
• Final Vision for the City/Municipality
4. Identify outdated plans that will need to be
updated and plans that can be absorbed in • List of ‘responsive’ Plans that will be
the CDP. Include the accomplished PPAs as absorbed in the updated CDP
inputs.
• List of Plans that needs to be updated
• List of accomplished PPAs

Lead Office/Persons

• C/MPDC with the assistance C/MLGOO ROLES OF C/MLGOO:

& LGU Department Heads
1. Assist the C/MPDC in conducting the
ROLES OF C/MPDC: inventory and review of the existing plans.
1. Inventory of existing plans and lead in 2. Assist the C/MPDC in coordinating with
identifying which plans are still relevant concerned Department Heads and Sectoral
and which plans need to be updated, Committees.
2. Coordinate with concerned department ROLE OF LGU DEPARTMENT HEADS:
heads and sectoral committees in checking
the consistency of the vision and mission Assist the MPDC in determining the
with the sectoral objectives. consistency of the vision, mission and
objectives of existing plans and its alignment
3. Check if the vision, mission and objectives with the PDPFP and other higher level sectoral
of existing plans are aligned with the LGU’s plans.
own Vision and that of the PDPFP and
other national plans.

11
DILG CONCISE ILLUSTRATIVE GUIDE FOR THE PREPARATION, REVIEW, MONITORING AND UPDATING OF THE CDP & LDIP

Mainstreaming Entry Point Helpful Tips

T
There are 33 legally-mandated local plans that he second step of this Quick Guide
represent sectoral or thematic concerns. Each aims to identify and profile the existing
LGU is required to prepare them in order plans the LGU has. This will help
to ensure that the needs of these sectors are the planning team in limiting or expanding
known and addressed. All of them can be the scope of the Ecological Profile. Existing
mainstreamed or integrated in the CDP so sectoral and thematic plans that are still
long as they are included or represented in the responsive to the prevailing situation can be
whole CDP Process. If the LGUs don’t have incorporated in the CDP. There is no need to
them yet, it can be extracted from the CDP. re-do the profiling and project identification
for these plans. However, if these existing
plans are determined to be obsolete, then
there is a need to update them by including the
concerned sector or theme in the Ecological
References Profile. The inventory of NGA-mandated or
prescribed sectoral and thematic plans are
provided in Table 2 below.
1. CDP Guide Chapter I
2. Other NGA issued policy guides for specific
sectoral or thematic concerns

Table II. NGA Mandated/Prescribed Sectoral and Thematic Plans

NGA-mandated plans Other sectoral/thematic plans
1. Action Plan for the Protection of Children 1.Nutrition Action Plan
2. Aquatics and Fisheries Management Plan 2.ICT Plan
3. Annual Culture and the Arts Plan 3.Local Shelter Plan
4. Anti-Poverty Reduction Plan 4.Plan for the Elderly
5. Local Coconut Development Plan 5.Plan for Health and Family Planning
6. LDRRMP 6.Coastal Management Plan
7. Food Security Plan 7.Information Strategic and
8. Forest Management Plan Management Plan
9. Gender and Development Plan 8.People's Plan
10. Integrated Area Community Public Safety Plan 9.Business Plan/Strategy
11. Local Entrepreneurship Development Plan 10.Capacity Development Agenda/HRMD Plan
12. Sustainable Area Development Plan 11.Transportation Management Plan
13. Local Tourism Plan
14. Small and Medium Enterprise Development Plan
15. SAFDZ Plan
16. Solid Waste Management Plan
17. Watershed Management Plan
18. ADSDPP
19. Plan for PWDs
20. Forest Land Use Plan
21. Local Climate Change Action Plan (LCCAP)
22. Peace and Order Public Safety Plan (POPS Plan)

12
 CDP-LDIP PREP GUIDE

Chapter
CDP - LDIP Preparation Step 3
IV Prepare Ecological Profile and Structured List of
PPAs

Major Activities Helpful Tips

T
Based on the inventory of existing plans and he third step will essentially start
the review of the vision, mission and sectoral the Comprehensive Development
objectives, the LGU can now start the process Planning Cycle as prescribed in the
of: CDP Guide.
1. Ecological Profiling This step will correspond to Steps 2-8 of
the planning cycle. More than half of the
2. Structured list of PPAs work plan for the preparation of the CDP is
primarily involves Ecological Profiling and the
identification of issues and the interventions
to address them as contained in the structured
Indicative Dates list of PPAs. This is where consultations with
all stakeholders are of primary importance.
Their participation should be prioritized to
1st Week of ensure that their concerns are made known
and addressed.

February to
Last week of
April 2016 Lead Office/Persons

• City/Municipal Planning Team

Output Documents
ROLES OF CITY/MUNICIPAL PLANNING
TEAM:
• Ecological Profile (Form 1.a)*
1. Correctly and comprehensively profile
• Local Development Indicators Table their respective sectors.
(Form 1.b)*
2. Consult with members of each sector and
• Structured List of PPAs (Form 2)* inform them of the result of the profile and
validate the same
* The CDP-LDIP Illustrative Guide assigned
Form Numbers to the output documents that 3. Field-validate the PPAs in the structured
correspond to steps in the planning cycle. This list
serves as a guide for LGUs in the preparation
4. Participate in all activities as identified in
of their CDP. The same form numbers are also
the
referred to in the CDP Review Guide.

13
 DILG CONCISE ILLUSTRATIVE GUIDE FOR THE PREPARATION, REVIEW, MONITORING AND UPDATING OF THE CDP & LDIP

Figure II. The Enhanced Comprehensive Development Planning Cycle

Organizing
& Mobilizing the
Planning Team 3
Determining Vision-
Reality Gap

1 2 4
Setting/Revisiting Determining Generating New
the Vision Current Reality Information
Year 2022

Extracting Intelligence
13
Plan Monitoring and
Evaluation
Year
6
2017-2021
12 Determining Policy
Year 2016 Options
14 Implementing the Plan
Adjusting
the LDIP 7
accordingly 11 Setting Goals and
Budgeting Objectives

10 9 8
Investment Approving and
Structuring Solutions
Programming Legitimizing the Plan

Figure III.
Mainstreaming Entry Point
A graphical representation of the CDP Preparation
steps (Steps 1-2) which are activities involved in
Ecological Profiling. Note that one Ecological • Ecological Profiling is the most critical
Profile (EP) which represents the “current reality”
(based on one year or period only) is not sufficient entry point in mainstreaming a specific
for planning purposes. At least two EPs covering thematic concern in the CDP.
two time periods is needed.
• The planning team should ensure that
the prescribed tools for mainstreaming
1
Setting/Revisiting
2
Determining
are used in the gathering and analysis of
the Vision Current Reality information.
• Tools such as Disaster Risk and
b. Validate the said a. Gather data and information Vulnerability Assessment for DRR/CCA
data through based on the identified Vision concerns are used in this step.
consultations and Element or Descriptors for the five
comparisons with development sectors (Economic, • Data disaggregation for Gender Sensitivity
the data from higher Social, Environment, Infrastructure
or lower-level LGUs and Institutional Development). (M or F) and age groups for children
You may refer to the DILG Guide and the Senior Citizens must be made
to Ecological Profiling for the list whenever applicable and possible.
of data requirements for each
Ecological Profile Development Sector.

14
 CDP-LDIP PREP GUIDE

Figure IV. “Readily Useable” Ecological

Profile and LDI Matrix
A graphical representation of the steps involved in making Helpful Tips
a readily useable Ecological Profile and its output tool the

W
Local Development Indicator System Matrix. This output
documents will yield the issues or levels of development or hile the LDIS’ old list of data is a
underdevelopment of a particular City or Municipality that need very useful tool for identifying
to be addressed thru interventions in the form of PPAs. issues based on the LGUs’
particular vision, most planning practitioners
find it very hard to populate or complete. The
Steps 1-5
DILG assisted by the European Union thru the
“Readily Usable”
Ecological Profile LGU PFM 2 project developed an alternative
analytical dataset that LGUs may use if they
do not have the capacity to complete the
3
Determining Vision- old data set. The Rationalized Planning
Reality Gap Indicator and Data Set (RaPIDS) prescribes a
minimum data set applicable to all LGU types
4 and prescribes additional data set unique
Generating New
Information
to specific LGUs. For example, data sets or
indicators for Upland LGUs are different from
5
those prescribed for Coastal LGUs. Special
sectoral data requirements are also prescribed
Extracting Intelligence
depending on the LGUs priority development
thrust.

Local Development Indicator System

(LDIS)

Indicator System
Features LDIS RaPIDS
Comprehensiveness ✓ ✗
Resources
✗ ✓
Requirement
Customization ✗ ✓

Figure V. LDIS VS. RAPIDS

If an LGU does not have the capacity or resources to
complete the data requirements in the old LDIS list,
they may opt to use the RaPIDS as their starter data
set instead. However, the RaPIDS does not provide
an analysis as comprehensive as that in the old set if
LGUs will not opt to add additional indicators to the
basic minimum data set. Please see the RaPIDS guide
for more information.

15
DILG CONCISE ILLUSTRATIVE GUIDE FOR THE PREPARATION, REVIEW, MONITORING AND UPDATING OF THE CDP & LDIP

Figure VI. The Structured List Of PPAs 6

Determining Policy
Figure VI demonstrates the steps involve in the preparation of the Structured Options
List of PPAs. This list is what the LGUs call the long list of PPAs from the five
development sectors. This will be the main source of PPAs that will later be
prioritized for implementation. Note that this list should be traceable or linked
7
to the descriptors in the LGU vision, goals and objectives. Setting Goals and
Objectives

• Goal formulation or the process of determining what citizens

want their city or municipality to become is often considered the
8
most important step in the planning process
Structuring Solutions
• Sectoral goals are the desired ends consistent with the Success
indicators. These are results that are the same, or derived from,
the particular element of the vision statement pertaining to a
specific sector. This relationship is necessary to ensure that every
policy and action (programs, projects, activities, legislative and
other regulatory measures) formulated in the CDP will contribute Structured List of
to the realization of the vision. PPAs

Figure VII. The Structured List Of PPAs

as an Output Document
13
Figure VII situates the Structured List of PPAs as an
Plan Monitoring and output document of steps 6-8 of the CDP Planning Cycle.
Evaluation implementation. Note that this list should be traceable or linked
to the descriptors in the LGU vision, goals and objectives.

12

Implementing the Plan (Steps 1-5)

14
Adjusting the LDIP “Readily Usable” Local Development
accordingly Ecological Profile Indicator System
11 Including the Updated LGU (LDIS) Table
Budgeting Vision

10 9
Investment Approving and Structured List of
Programming Legitimizing the Plan PAPs

References

1. DILG Guide to Ecological Profiling (DILG- 5. Tourism Development Planning Guide

BLGD) (DILG-BLGD)
2. Guide to the Rationalized Planning Indicator 6. Guide to the Localization of Magna Carta of
Data Set (RaPIDS) (DILG-BLGD) Women (PCW)
3. Guidelines on Mainstreaming CCA and DRR 7. Mainstreaming Bio-diversity in Local Plans
in the CDP (DILG-BLGD) (DENR)
4. Supplemental Guidelines on Mainstreaming
Climate and Disaster Risk in the CLUP
Preparation (HLURB)

16
 CDP-LDIP PREP GUIDE

Chapter

V
RATIONALIZED PLANNING
INDICATOR DATA SET (RaPIDS)

T
he Rationalized Planning Indicator and Data Set (RaPIDS) is a tool developed under the EU PFM 2
Project that aims to guide Local Planners in identifying development indicators that specifically applies
to their LGU’s needs and characteristics. RaPIDS still follow the principles of the Local Development
Indicator System which is based on the LGU’s vision and success indicators. RaPIDS only updated the indicators
to make them consistent with those required and accepted by National Government Agencies and International
institutions. It also added several indicators required by recent statutes such as DRR/CCA indicators and
indicators used to articulate certain thematic and sectoral concerns such as gender and conflict sensitivity.
It also has specific indicators that LGUs may need should they have particular development thrusts such as
indicators for tourism development and indicators that can help LGUs identify PPAs to make themselves more
business-friendly. Indicators for specific eco-systems are also identified. RaPIDS aims to address the issue on
data gathering by helping planners identify indicators that applies to them and those that they really need as
compared to prescribing a one size fits all data set which makes data gathering very challenging at the onset.

Figure VIII. RaPIDS Screenshot

Helpful Tips

T
he RaPIDS is presented as a shopping
list of indicators where LGU can
choose those that specifically applies to
them. RaPIDS has a basic minimum indicator
set generally applicable to all LGUs plus
additional set of indicators depending on an
LGU’s eco system, development thrust and
priority concern based on national policies.
RaPIDS also identified indicators consistent
with other instruments used by the DILG
and other Government Agencies such as
the Community Based Monitoring System
(CBMS), Seal of Good Local Governance
(SGLG) and Conflict Sensitivity and Peace
Promoting (CSPP) Principles as espoused
by the Office of the Presidential Adviser on
the Peace Process (OPAPP) and Climate and
Disaster risk Assessment (CDRA) tool by the
Climate Change Commission (CCC). This
grouping of indicators according to ecosystem
and themes made the choosing of indicators
easier by eliminating indicators that does
not particularly apply to a certain LGU even
before they start data gathering. This can
actually save LGUs time and resources.

17
DILG CONCISE ILLUSTRATIVE GUIDE FOR THE PREPARATION, REVIEW, MONITORING AND UPDATING OF THE CDP & LDIP

Figure IX. RaPIDS Indicator Composition

Minimum Basic
Indicators

Ecosystem-Based Sectoral/Thematic
Indicators Indicators

Customized LGU
Development Indicators

18
 CDP-LDIP PREP GUIDE

Chapter

VI
THE LOCAL DEVELOPMENT
INVESTMENT PROGRAM (LDIP)

T
he Local Development Investment Program (LDIP) is the principal instrument for implementing the
Comprehensive Development Plan. It is a document that translates the CDP into programs and projects
and selects those that will be picked up by the LGU for funding in the annual general fund budget or
through special fund generation schemes.
The LDIP should have a time frame of three (3) years. Its annual component is what is referred to as the
Annual Investment Program (AIP). The preparation of the LDIP is mentioned as one of the basis for the budget
document in DBM’s Budget Operations Manual (BOM).

34+19+2210285A
Investment program in public finance is also a program for utilizing the investible portion of the local budget.
The investible portion of the local development fund is that component of the local budget which will be
earmarked for financing the priority programs and projects in the AIP; while the remaining portion will go
into financing the costs of functions and services of the different LGU offices and departments.

Figure X. Funds Available For Development Investment

Personal Services
Maintenance & Other Operating Expenses
Office Capital Outlay
Statutory Obligations
IRA
Non-Office Capital Outlay
Non-Office MOOE
19
DILG CONCISE ILLUSTRATIVE GUIDE FOR THE PREPARATION, REVIEW, MONITORING AND UPDATING OF THE CDP & LDIP

T
he local development fund is that portion of the local budget that is “plowed back” to
the people in the form of programs, projects and services.
It consists of the following:
a. 20% of the IRA
b. Non-office maintenance and other operating expenses (e.g., balloons, T-shirts for
sports fests and office anniversary, streamers and banners, etc.)
c. Non-office capital outlay (draperies, microwave oven, refrigerator and other equipment
that are not essential for the delivery of services of a particular office or department)
The local development fund DOES NOT INCLUDE that portion of the local budget which is
consumed by the local government machinery for salaries, wages and other personnel costs,
office maintenance and other operating expenditures, and office capital outlay.
Investment programming in the context of the LGU’s planning and development function
involves generating the programs and projects derived from the detailed elaboration of the
CLUP and the CDP.
Specifically, this form of public spending will:
a. modify, guide, direct, control or otherwise elicited the desired private sector response
in order to accelerate local economic development;
b. raise the level of socio-cultural well-being;
c. improve the standard of public services, utilities and infrastructures, and, on the whole;
and
d. attain the desired urban form in the CLUP and the general welfare goals of the CDP.

Figure XI. The LDIP As An Output Document

Figure XI situates the LDIP as an output document for steps 9-10 in the
CDP Planning cycle.

13
Plan Monitoring and (Steps 1-5) Local Development
Evaluation “Readily Usable” Indicator System
Ecological Profile (LDIS) Table
Including the Updated LGU Vision
12

Implementing the Plan

11

Budgeting
(Steps 9-10)
3-Year Local Development
Investment Program Structured List of
(LDIP) – Ranked List of PPAs for PAPs
investment programming with
financial plan and project brief

20
 CDP-LDIP PREP GUIDE

Helpful Tips

T
he 20% of IRA share is NOT the only
source of development funds. It is
intended to be the floor, not the ceiling,
when it comes to determining the LGU’s
development fund.

I
nvestment programs must be spatially, rather than merely sectorally focused. The
projects must therefore be selected not only for their potential to satisfy sectoral
requirements but also for their impact on the direction and intensity of urban
growth geared toward the realization of the desired urban form. Some examples of
investment projects are listed below:
a. Investment projects that encourage growth
i. “anchor” facilities like a university, hospital, public market
ii. Interchanges, bus terminals, transit stops
b. Investment projects that discourage development in the vicinity
i. Waste disposal site
ii. Sewage treatment plan
iii. Prison or mental hospital
c. Investments that limit growth in the urban fringe
i. Land reservation or acquisition for conservation
ii. Utility extension limits
iii. Low-density institutional uses such as military camps, university campuses,
research/science parks
iv. Reservations for open space and outdoor recreation areas

References

CDP Guide Chapter IV Part 1

21
DILG CONCISE ILLUSTRATIVE GUIDE FOR THE PREPARATION, REVIEW, MONITORING AND UPDATING OF THE CDP & LDIP

Chapter
CDP - LDIP Preparation Step 4
Prepare the Local Development Investment
Program (LDIP) VII
Major Activities Output Documents

1. Prepare project briefs for every PPA.

• Project Brief for every identified PPAs
2. Conduct of further screening and prioritization (Form 3b)
of the Structured List of PPAs.
• Ranked List of Projects for the 3 year
3. Determine total investible funds. Investment Programming (Form 3a)

4. Formulate the corresponding financial plan. • New Investment Financing Potential Form
(Form 3c)
• Resource Mobilization Plan (c/o Local
Indicative Dates Treasurer)
*These three (3) documents combined plus the

May 2016
LDIP Summary Form will comprise the Local
Development Investment Program (LDIP) of
the City/Municipality

Lead Office/Persons

• City/Municipal Planning Team and Local Finance Committee

ROLES OF CITY/MUNICIPAL PLANNING TEAM:
1. Participate in the prioritization activities and ensure that all sectors are properly represented.
2. Ensure that the prioritization process is diligently and judiciously done.
ROLES OF THE LOCAL FINANCE COMMITTEE:
1. Formulate a sound and objective Resource Mobilization Plan and Financing Plan for the LDIP
2. Coordinate with the BLGF, DBM or other NGAs for assistance on forecasting if necessary
3. Coordinate closely with the planning team in the preparation of the LDIP
4. The Local Treasurer in consultation with the Bureau of Local Government Finance (BLGF) will
generate Medium-Term Revenue Forecasts (3-6 years) for the Internal Revenue Allotment (IRA),
own-source revenues, borrowings and other grants and in consultation with an LDC prepare the
Resource Mobilization Plan and Financing Plan.
5. The Local Budget Officer in consultation with Department of Budget and Management will prepare
the medium-term Forward Estimates for Personal Services (PS), Maintenance and Other Operating
Expenses (MOOE) and Capital (minor) Outlay (CO), collectively the Current Operation Expenses
(COE).

22
 CDP-LDIP PREP GUIDE

Helpful Tips

T
he fourth step in CDP formulation is investment programming. This is where the PPAs are given their
corresponding resource requirements like funding, time and manpower. Usually, LGUs prepare the
Annual Investment Program (AIP) which should be the annual slice of the LDIP and only provides a
year’s worth of PPAs. The LDIP, on the other hand, is a 3-year investment program that provides for a more
impactful and SUSTAINABLE list of PPAs. LDIP preparation consists of three (3) Streams.
• STREAM 1 – The Structured List of PPAs should be the primary source for project ideas when the LCE
calls for it in the LDC. This is the first step in approving and legitimizing the CDP.
• The list will then be subjected to screening using the following tools and shortlist them by sector:
◉ Urgency Test Matrix
◉ Resource Impact Matrix
◉ Conflict-compatibility-complemantarity matrix
• The Executive Committee of the LDC shall then present the shorlisted or Ranked List of PPAs including
their project brief in plenary for approval
• The Ranked list of PPAs according to the screening tools shall further be subjected to the Goal
Achievement Matrix (GAM) Analysis for further prioritization to produce the Ranked List of PPAs for
Investment Programming.
• STREAM 2 – After, the Ranked List of PPAs for investment programming will then be cross-matched with
available resources including investible funds as identified by the Local Finance Committee through the
evaluation of the Revenue Forecasts with the Medium-Term Estimates of Current Operating Expenses,
manpower and period of implementation
• STREAM 3 – The LDC with the assistance of the Local Finance Committee shall determine the Financing
Approach they will take:
◉ Developmental Approach
◉ Conservative Approach
◉ Pragmatic Approach
• If the LGU will choose the Conservative Approach, they would have to cut down the list of PPAs to be
implemented to work within the resources under the new investment financing potential only
• If the LGU has to take the developmental or pragmatic approach, they have to prepare a Resource
Mobilization Plan and financing plan for each of the three (3) years included in the LDIP.

Mainstreaming Entry Point

• Ensure that the necessary analytical tools

for mainstreaming thematic concerns in the References
prioritization of PPAs are applied such as the
Conflict Tree Analysis and Issue Prioritization
1. CDP Guide Chapter IV Part 1
Matrix for conflict-sensitivity and the gender
sensitivity checklist for GAD. 2. Treasurer’s Operations Manual
• Ensure that every sector is represented and are 3. Budget’s Operations Manual
given a chance to participate in the prioritization
exercise.

23
DILG CONCISE ILLUSTRATIVE GUIDE FOR THE PREPARATION, REVIEW, MONITORING AND UPDATING OF THE CDP & LDIP

Figure XII. LDIP Streams

Comprehensive Development Plan

Development (CDP)
Planning
(January-April)

Structured List of Programs,

Projects and Activities (PPAs)

Stream 1 Stream 2

• Prioritization of PPAs • The LTO will provide

New Investment
using tools (CCC, Urgency the Revenue Forecast
Financing Potential
Test, Resource Impact and for 6 years and the
(Net amount of Revenue
GAM Analysis) Forecast minus LBO will provide
• Planning Team & LDC Forward Estimates of the corresponding
Expenditures) forward estimates of
expenditures to net out
the New Investment
Ranked List of PPAs Resource Mobilization Financing Potential
Plan (RMP) (Additional • LFC + LDC
Funds from improved
Fiscal Management)
Conservative Approach – cut
the list of PPAs to work within
the New Investment Financing
Potential only Other Financing
Options (Additional
funds from Borrowings,
Bond flotations, PPPs)
Developmental Approach – find
other sources of funds NO
Stream 3

Matched?

YES
• If a match has been made, the LPDC
Investment 3-Year Local Development prepares LDIP with its corresponding
Planning Investment Program RMP and/or Financing options to be
(May-June 7) (LDIP) approved by the LDC and endorsed to
the Sanggunian for adoption
• LPDC prepares the A1P (annual slice of
the LDIP) for approval by the LOC and
Annual Investment submits to the Sanggunian for adoption
Program (AIP)

Budgeting
Annual Budget
(June-September)

24
 CDP-LDIP PREP GUIDE

Chapter

VIII
CDP - LDIP Preparation Step 5
Prepare Needed Implementation Instruments
and Authority Levers

Helpful Tips
Major Activities

T
he fifth and last step in CDP
1. Prepare the Annual Investment Program
Preparation is the preparation of
(annual slice of the LDIP)
several instruments and authority
2. Identify Priority Legislative Requirements levers that will aid in the implementation of
needed to implement the LDIP the priority PPAs in the LDIP. A very good
plan remains to be just another document if
3. Identify priority capacity development it is not implemented. This step also provides
interventions to implement the LDIP the linkage from planning to budgeting and
completes the cyclical nature of planning thru
4. Prepare Plan M & E Strategy
monitoring and evaluation strategies.

Lead Office/Persons

• C/MPDC, Budget Officer, SB/SP Secretary • C/MPDC, Budget Officer, SB/SP Secretary
and HRMO and HRMO
ROLES OF SB/SP SECRETARY: ROLES OF C/MPDC:
1. Identify together with the C/MPDC, the 1. Ensure that the approved AIP is derived from
needed legislative requirements for the the LDIP.
implementation of priority PPAs based on the
LDIP. 2. Coordinate with the Sanggunian in the
identification of legislative requirements.
2. Inform the concerned Sanggunian of
the legislative requirements for the 3. Prepare the Monitoring and Evaluation
implementation of the LDIP and calendar the Strategies with the assistance of the planning
same to serve as basis for subsequent sessions. team.

ROLES OF THE HRMO: 4. At the end of every year, prepare the Annual
Accomplishment Report.
1. Assist the C/MPDC in the formulation of the
CapDev Agenda. ROLES OF THE BUDGET OFFICER:

2. Coordinate with the concerned department 1. Prepare the budget document based on the
heads in identifying priority institutional approved AIP and LDIP.
and administrative requirements and 2. Assist the C/MPDC in updating the LDIP
interventions (i.e. trainings, systems and should there be changes in the AIP.
equipment procurements) to implement the
PPAs in the LDIP.

25
DILG CONCISE ILLUSTRATIVE GUIDE FOR THE PREPARATION, REVIEW, MONITORING AND UPDATING OF THE CDP & LDIP

11 12

Budgeting Implementing the Plan

Helpful Tips Helpful Tips

• In accordance with the provisions of JMC • The CDP, to be implemented effectively,

No. 001 series of 2007, the LDC shall cull out requires a set of competencies and
the AIP from the current slice of the LDIP, institutional arrangements that should be
which upon approval of the Sanggunian, present in the LGU. This set of competencies
shall serve as the basis for preparing the and institutional arrangements comprise
Executive Budget. an organization’s capacity. Thus, the LGU
needs to prepare a Capacity Development
• The LDC shall endorse the AIP to the local Program/ Agenda as part of the institutional
budget officer for the budget preparation sector of the CDP
and in determining the annual budgetary
allocations for PAP vis-à-vis allocations • A capacity development program/agenda is
for other purposes as indicated in the AIP a document that
Summary Form.
◉ Seeks to rationalize and strategically
focus the capability building efforts of
LGUs;
◉ Outlines the capability building
interventions or programs that need to
Indicative Dates
be undertaken to address an identified
capability deficiency; and
1. AIP Sanggunian-approved - June 07, 2016
◉ Draws the capacity development
2. Priority Legislative Requirements & strategies, programs and initiatives
CapDev Agenda - July-September 2016 that need to be undertaken to
address identified organizational
3. Plan M&E Strategy - September 2016 competency gaps, indicating the target
groups, specific approaches that are
recommended, resources required and
the timeline.
• Legislative requirements is as important
Output Documents
as the resources. Since the authority levers
will make the implementation of the CDP
• Annual Investment Program (AIP possible.
Summary) (Form 4)
• The legislative requirements of the CDP
• Legislative Requirements (ELA) & are the priority legislations that need to
Capacity Development Agenda (CapDev) be enacted by the Sanggunian to support
(Form 5a & 5b) development priorities of the LGU in the
medium – and long – term. These may include
• Monitoring and Evaluation Instrument new legislation as well as amendments and
(M&E) (Form 6a & 6b) updates to existing legislation. This may also
be included in the ELA.

26
 CDP-LDIP PREP GUIDE

13
Plan Monitoring and Mainstreaming Entry Point
Evaluation
• This is the step where sectoral and thematic plans
can be culled from the LDIP, if there are none,
and included in the AIP for implementation.
Helpful Tips
• vThe Legislative requirements for these sectoral
plans can also be included in the ELA. Other
• For planning to be truly continuous, it resources can be included in the CapDev
must form part of the regular function of Agenda.
the LDC. One major activity that the LDC
is mandated to perform is to “coordinate,
monitor, evaluate the implementation
of development programs and projects”
(Section 109 (a) (5), RA 7160). References

• M & E serves as the link between one

planning cycle to the next 1. CDP Guide Chapter III Part 2-4

• M & E for cyclical comprehensive planning 2. CDP Guide Chapter IV

is concerned with determining the changes 3. NEO Program Module (LGA)
attributed to planned and unplanned
developments. These changes manifest
themselves in terms of a changed state of
the following:
1. social and economic well – being of
the inhabitants;
2. quantity and quality of the physical
environment; and Figure XIII. Implementation
Instruments As Output Docu-
3. institutional capabilities for local ments
governance
Figure XIII shows how the implementation
instruments are situated in the CDP planning
cycle as output documents.

(Steps 1-5)
“Readily Usable”
Ecological Profile
13 Including the Updated LGU Vision
Accomplishment
Report & M&E Strategy
Local Development Indicator
Template
System Matrix (LDIS)

11
Annual Investment
Program (AIP) (Steps 6-8)
CAPDEV Program Structured List of
PAPs

12 Medium Term Local Development

Legislative Measures Investment Program (LDIP)
(Steps 9-10)

27
DILG CONCISE ILLUSTRATIVE GUIDE FOR THE PREPARATION, REVIEW, MONITORING AND UPDATING OF THE CDP & LDIP

Chapter

IX
CDP AND LDIP REVIEW PROCESS

Purpose of the Review Who Conducts the Review

• Assess the compliance of LGU’s CDP

• For component LGUs, the PDC with the
and LDIPs to the policy based budgeting
PPDO acting as technical secretariat.
principles embodied in the CDP and LDIP
guidelines. • For highly urbanized and independent
cities, the RDC with either NEDA & DILG
• Determine the alignment with the PDPFP
ROs acting as technical reviewers.
and PDIP with regards to:
◉ oDevelopment goals, objectives and
strategies
Components of the Review Process
◉ oPhysical framework
◉ oInvestment program • Form Review – to ensure that the submitted
CDP and LDIP documents are complete.
• Assess adherence of the preparation process,
and content of the CDP and LDIP submission • Process Review – to determine whether
vis-à-vis the requirements of policy based the CDP and LDIP submission reflects
budgeting as embodied in DILG’s guidelines. the organizational/institutional processes
(including information sharing and
• Provide a basis for improvements in in the consensus building) and content
CDP and LDIP. generation linkages envisioned by the
• Establish a measure for the future CDP guide.
qualification and provision of performance • Content Review – to assess the substance
grants and other support and assistance from and logic of the CDP and LDIP
the National Government. submission with emphasis on the clarity,
comprehensiveness, and quality of
various components of the planning and
investment programming processes.

Figure XIV. CDP-LDIP Review Process

FORM PROCESS CONTENT

Looks if the prescribed Looks if the prescribed Looks at the consistency

templates in the CDP process was followed as of the plan including
Guide was used in the evidenced by minutes its vertical alignment
process and membership with higher level plans
and horizontal linkages
across sectors and LDIP

28
 CDP-LDIP PREP GUIDE

CDP and LDIP Form Review CDP and LDIP Content Review

Completeness: The availability and

Quality of output and analysis internal to each
timeliness of the key documents and
main CDP component. This concerns the
forms comprising the CDP and LDIP.
quality of analytical inputs and corresponding
Structure and sequence: The extent to which outputs in each component, relative to internal
the draft CDP and LDIP follows the structure objectives and logic, as described in the CDP
and sequence prescribed in the CDP Guide. guide:
Minimum maps and tables: The presence ◉ Vision/goals and objectives.
(or absence) of selected maps and tables.
◉ Ecological profile
Source acknowledgement: Proper
acknowledgement of sourced material through ◉ Strategies and PPAs
footnotes, endnotes, bibliographical entries, etc.
Quality of linkages between components.

◉ Development framework
CDP and LDIP Process ◉ Development issues, goals, objectives,
and targets
Leadership involvement. The extent to which ◉ Strategies and PPAs
the CDP and LDIP reflects the vision, policies
and participation of the LGU leadership, Coverage of LDIP policies:
especially the LCE, as indicated by: ◉ PPAs limited to those identified in
◉ The participation of the LCE in the the CDP;
visioning activity; and ◉ Tie up of prioritization criteria to
◉ The provision of updates to the LDC. CDP objectives;

Consultation and participation. The extent to ◉ Coverage of revenue policies, use of

which the CDP and LDIP reflects the views debt, special assessments and other
and aspirations of LGU stakeholders and financing tools; and
other constituents. ◉ Use of cost recovery policies.
Quality of the LDIP financing plan and
investment schedule:
References ◉ Historical analyses of revenue and
expenditure projections;
Annex C. CDP and LDIP Review Process and ◉ Use of expected trends and
Checklist developments for revenue and
expenditure projections;
◉ Investment financing needs covered
by projected fund sources; and
◉ Total annual debt service within 20%
of total annual revenues.

29
DILG CONCISE ILLUSTRATIVE GUIDE FOR THE PREPARATION, REVIEW, MONITORING AND UPDATING OF THE CDP & LDIP

SYNCHRONIZED LOCAL PLANNING Chapter

X
AND BUDGETING CALENDAR
(SLPBC REVISED 2016)
NG Oversight Agencies
YEAR/MONTH Guidelines, Manuals, Tools, PROVINCE CITY/MUNICIPALITY
Systems and Activities
Year 0/ October 1. LGFPMS (BLGF) RaPIDS/LDIS Financial RaPIDS/LDIS Financial
-December Indicators generated and Indicators generated and
2. Financial Sustainability made available to LGU by made available to LGU by
Scorecard (BLGF) BLGF. BLGF.
3. E-SRE (BLGF)
4. LGPMS (DILG)
5. RPS Guide (DILG)
6. CDP Guide and Illustrative
Guide (DILG)
7. RaPIDS Guide (DILG)

Year 1/January 1. PLPEM (NEDA) Guidelines for Data

Collection and Gathering
Issued.
Year 1/February 1. RPS Guide (DILG) RaPIDS/LDIS completed.
2. CDP Guide and Illustrative
Guide (DILG)
3. RaPIDS Guide (DILG)

Year 1/March 1. PLPEM (NEDA) Updated Planning

database completed.
Year 1/April 1. PLPEM (NEDA) Draft Situational Analysis Medium-Term Revenue
and Assessment of (Own-Source and External)
Plan Implementation Forecasts for Planning
completed. Purposes generated
(latest year Yt-2) by Local
Treasurers.
2. Fiscal Capacity Model
System (BLGF)
3. PFM Tools using the Medium-Term Revenue Medium-Term Forecasts for
E-SRE (BLGF) (Own-Source and Current Operating Expenses
External) Forecasts prepared by Local Finance
for Planning Purposes Committee.
generated (latest year Yt-
2) by Local Treasurers.
4. BOM (DBM)
5. LTOM (BLGF) Medium-Term Forecasts Comprehensive
for Current Operating Development Plan (CDP)
Expenses prepared completed (Structured List
by Local Finance of PPAs completed)
Committee.
6. RMM (BLGF)
30
 CDP-LDIP PREP GUIDE

NG Oversight Agencies
YEAR/MONTH Guidelines, Manuals, Tools, PROVINCE CITY/MUNICIPALITY
Systems and Activities
7. RPS Guide (DILG)
8. CDP Guide and Illustrative
Guide (DILG)
Year 1/May 1. PLPEM (NEDA) Annual Revenue Targets Annual Revenue Target
generated and issued to generated and issued to all
all LGUs by BLGF. LGUs by BLGF
2. BOM (DBM)
3. LTOM (BLGF) Draft Resource Resource Mobilization Plan
Mobilization Plan (RMP) (RMP) generated by Local
generated by Local Treasurer.
Treasurer.
4. PFM Tools using the
E-SRE (BLGF)
5. DOF Departmental Provincial Development Project Briefs completed.
Order ___ (BLGF) Investment Program
completed.
6. RMM (BLGF)
7. CDP Guide and Illustrative Annual Investment Ranked Projects, Activities
Guide (DILG) Program completed and Programs completed
and approved by Local
Sanggunian.

Financing Plan completed.

3-6-year LDIP completed.

Year 1/June 1. Release of Official Internal Receipt of Announcement Annual Investment
Revenue Allotment of Official Internal Program approved by Local
by DBM (June 7). Revenue Allotment by Sanggunian.
DBM (June 7).
2. BOM (DBM) (June 7).
3. CDP Guide and Illustrative Budget Call (June 15)
Guide (DILG)
Receipt of Announcement
of Official Internal Revenue
Allotment by DBM (June 7).

Budget Call (June 15)

Year 1/July 1. PLPEM (NEDA) Final Annual Revenue Final Annual Revenue
Target issued. Target issued.
2. BOM (DBM)
3. LTOM (BLGF) Conduct of Budget Adjusted Resource
Forums (NEP) – July 5, Mobilization Plan
completed by Local
Treasurer, if necessary due
to substantive changes
in Final Annual Revenue
Target vis-à-vis Current
Year Forecast.

31
DILG CONCISE ILLUSTRATIVE GUIDE FOR THE PREPARATION, REVIEW, MONITORING AND UPDATING OF THE CDP & LDIP

NG Oversight Agencies
YEAR/MONTH Guidelines, Manuals, Tools, PROVINCE CITY/MUNICIPALITY
Systems and Activities
4. PFM Tools using the
E-SRE (BLGF)
5. DOF Departmental Prepare and submit Legislative Requirements,
Order ___ (BLGF) Budget Proposals (July ELA and Capacity
15) Development Agenda
completed.
6. RMM (BLGF)
7. CDP Guide and Illustrative Resource Mobilization Conduct of Budget Forums
Guide (DILG) Plan completed by Local (NEP) – July 5,
Treasurer.

Legislative Requirements, Prepare and submit Budget

ELA and Capacity Proposals (July 15)
Development Agenda
completed.
Year 1/August 1. BOM (DBM) Conduct Budget Hearings Conduct Budget Hearings
(Aug 15) (Aug 15)
Year 1/September 1. CDP Guide and Illustrative C/M: Monitoring and
Guide (DILG). Evaluation Plan completed
2. CDP Review Guide (DILG)
Year 1/October 1. BOM (DBM). Preparation of Executive Preparation of Executive
Budget (Oct 10) Budget (Oct 10)

Preparation of Budget Preparation of Budget

Message (Oct 10) Message (Oct 10)

Submission of Executive Submission of Executive

Budget to Local Budget to Local Sanggunian
Sanggunian for approval. for approval. (Oct 16)
(Oct 16)

Budget Authorization Budget Authorization

issued. issued.
Year 1/November - 1. BOM (DBM). Budget Authorization Budget Authorization issued
December issued
Year 2/ January-March 1. BOM (DBM). Budget Review. Budget Review.
2. CDP Review Guide (DILG) CDP Review. CDP Review

Year 2/January- 1. BOM (DBM). Budget Execution. Budget Execution.

December

Budget Accountability Budget Accountability

32
 CDP-LDIP PREP GUIDE

Chapter

XI LDIP UPDATING

Annual Updating of the 3-year LDIP Preparation of the Second 3-year LDIP

I A
f an LGU was not able to fund and pursue fter the implementation of the first
the PPAs in the current slice of the LDIP three year LDIP of the LGU’s CDP,
(AIP), the LDIP should be updated the LDC and the LFC will have to
accordingly in the ensuing year. This entails undergo Streams 1-3 of the LDIP Process
the adjusting of the list of prioritized PPAs and again taking into consideration those PPAs
the corresponding financing plan. LGUs thru that were completed and those that were not
the Local Finance Committee and the LDC implemented in the last three years. LGUs
should undergo Streams 2 and 3 of the LDIP may have to revisit priorities based on the
process to ensure that the list of PPAs to be implementation of the first LDIP and may
funded and implemented in the ensuing year consider other financing options to ensure
are adjusted to accommodate those that were that most if not all the PPAs in the CDP are
not funded or pursued in the preceding year. implemented during the second half of the
LGUs may update their resource generation CDP’s period of implementation. Again, there
strategy or consider other financing options is a need for the annual updating of the second
to fund the projects so that PPAs maybe be LDIP to ensure sustainability and continuity
implemented according to the scheduled of PPA implementation and goal achievement.
period of implementation in the CDP. This
also ensures the continuity of the LDIP in
each of its AIP.
Figure XV. LDIP Updating
(Based on RPS, Serote, 2008)
Organizing
& Mobilizing the
3
Planning Team Determining Vision-
Reality Gap

1 2 4
Setting/Revisiting Determining Generating New
the Vision Current Reality Information
Year 2022

Extracting Intelligence
13
Plan Monitoring and
Evaluation
Year
6
2017-2021
12 Determining Policy
Year 2016 Options
14 Implementing the Plan
Adjusting
the LDIP 7
accordingly 11 Setting Goals and
Budgeting Objectives

10 9 8
Investment Approving and
Structuring Solutions
Programming Legitimizing the Plan

33
DILG CONCISE ILLUSTRATIVE GUIDE FOR THE PREPARATION, REVIEW, MONITORING AND UPDATING OF THE CDP & LDIP

ANNEX

34
 CDP-LDIP PREP GUIDE

Annex INTEGRATED PLANNING PROCESS

A
WITH LOCAL SPECIAL BODIES AND
ADVISORY COUNCILS
A. Stage One: Establishing and Populating the Planning Database.

1. Convene the Local Development Council to design and collectively agree on the local planning
database.

2. Prepare the database utilizing, but not limited to, the following data sources, manuals and
guides:

a. Rationalized Planning Indicator and Data System (RaPIDS) – DILG

b. Community-Based Monitoring System (CBMS) – DILG
c. Local Governance Performance Management System (LGPMS) – DILG
d. Electronic Statement of Receipts and Expenditures (E-SRE) – BLGF-DOF
e. Local Government Financial Performance Monitoring System (LGFPMS) – BLGF-DOF
f. LGU Fiscal Sustainability Scorecard – BLGF-DOF
g. Public Financial Management Assessment Tool (PFMAT) – DBM
h. Public Financial Management Assessment Tool Improvement Plan (PFMAT IP) – DBM
i. Provincial Development Physical Framework Plan (PDPFP) – Province and NEDA
j. Comprehensive Land Use Plan/Existing Land Use Map
k. Base, Hazard and Other Maps – Province, DILG, NAMRIA, etc.

3. Assign key members, divisions and offices in the LGU to undertake the responsibility for popu-
lating and maintaining the database.

4. Disseminate the data to the Provincial Planning Office and to local special planning bodies, local
advisory councils and sectoral or functional committees.

35
DILG CONCISE ILLUSTRATIVE GUIDE FOR THE PREPARATION, REVIEW, MONITORING AND UPDATING OF THE CDP & LDIP

B. Stage Two: Preparing the Draft Comprehensive Development Plan (CDP) and Local Develop-
ment Investment Program (LDIP).

1. Based on the Planning Database, prepare the Situational Analysis and Ecological Profile utiliz-
ing the format in the CDP Guide (DILG) and the Supplements to the CDP Guide (DILG).
.
2. Based on the Ecological Profile (ECOPROFILE), identify the development targets, timeframes,
and measurable outcomes.

3. Based development targets, timeframes, and measurable outcomes, identify the necessary proj-
ect and programs required to achieve these objectives – CDP Projects – Long List.

4. Prioritize the projects and programs utilizing the Goal Achievement Matrix (GAM) in the CDP
Guide (DILG) and the Supplements to the CDP Guide (DILG).

5. Draft the Comprehensive Development Plan utilizing the CDP Guide (DILG) and the Supple-
ments to the CDP Guide (DILG).

6. Draft the Local Development Investment Program based on the CDP and utilizing the CDP
Guide (DILG) and the Supplements to the CDP Guide (DILG).

7. Disseminate copies of the Ecological Profile, CDP and draft LDIP to local special planning bod-
ies, local advisory councils and sectoral or functional committees.

C. Stage Three: Preparation of the Plans of Local Advisory Councils and Sectoral or Functional
Committees for the Implementation of National Government Programs at the LGU level

1. The local advisory councils and sectoral or functional committees, especially for the implemen-
tation of national government programs at the LGU level, develops a long list of projects based
on the planning database, Ecoprofile, CDP and draft LDIP of the LGU as well as other data and
consultations with their members.

2. The members of the local advisory councils and sectoral or functional committees agree on the
prioritization criteria and votes on projects to be included in their annual plan.

3. The local advisory councils and sectoral or functional committees prepare a draft plan and dis-
seminates this to the Local Development Council (LDC) and the Provincial Development Council
(PDC).

36
 CDP-LDIP PREP GUIDE

D. Stage Four: Integration and Harmonization of Local Plans.

1. The Local Development Council convenes the Expanded LDC which would include representation
from the local advisory councils and sectoral or functional committees especially for the implementa-
tion of national government programs at the LGU level, and the PDC.

2. Through consultation, the long list of projects from these plans including the coming year priority
projects for the years are integrated into the final harmonized version of the Local Development
Investment Program (LDIP). The process should allow for the identification of areas of project dupli-
cation as well as were economies of scale and/or synergy can be achieved by combining projects.
In the latter case, the project can be implemented by the next higher level of LGU (e.g., province)
consequently freeing up the resource for other projects.

3. The Annual Investment Program (AIP), as a slice of the LDIP, will now also contain all projects in-
cluding those funded through national government programs.

4. The LDC prepares the Annual Budget based on the AIP.

5. The results will feedback to the long-list and short-list of projects of the local advisory councils and
sectoral or functional committees for the purpose of possible revision.

E. Stage Five: Plan Implementation Monitoring and Evaluation.

1. The Local Development Indicator System will be utilized to develop measures to monitor the imple-
mentation and outcomes of projects. Since plans and projects were based on these data, tracking of
their benefits will be more objective and measureable.

2. The Enhanced Local Development Council will meet regularly to review the reports of the different
monitoring groups.

37
DILG CONCISE ILLUSTRATIVE GUIDE FOR THE PREPARATION, REVIEW, MONITORING AND UPDATING OF THE CDP & LDIP

Annex

CDIP AND LDIP FORMS B

CDP Preparation Template Form 1.a (Ecological Profile)

LGU Vision & Mission:

(Please ensure that the vision is compliant with recent statutes such as CCA/DRR and gender
sensitivity. You may also include in this part the presentation of the success indicators per
vision element descriptor)

I. History
(The LGU may include a brief history of the city or municipality to highlight the unique
characteristics and significance of the locality in relation to the country or to its specific
region)

II. Profile, Analysis, and Development Goals:

(Part I will mainly be composed of the presentation of the data into graphs and tables per
sector and the results of the analysis of the data gathered as presented in the local
development indicators table or matrix (Form 1.b.). Analysis should include the vision reality
gap result and problem solution finding matrix (PSFM) per sector. Using the PSFM, policy
options and sectoral goals maybe derived. Please present the information per development
sector)

A. Social
B. Economic
C. Environmental
D. Physical/Infrastructure
E. Institutional

38
 CDP-LDIP PREP GUIDE

CDP Preparation Template Form 1. . ocal De elopment n icator tem aP D

SMALLER
INDICATOR OF SPATIAL
CORE PLANNING LARGER
SECTOR / SUB-SECTOR DEVELOPMENT OR UNITS OF
CONCERNS AREA SPATIAL UNIT
UNDERDEVELOPMENT PLANNING
AREA
1 2 3 ...n
1. SOCIAL

Demography • Population size

Population (all census years
Size available
including latest)

• Growth rate,
Population urban and rural,
Growth Rate short-term
medium term,
long term
(formula used)

• Gross population
Population density, 2
Distribution reference years
• Net population
density, 2
reference years
• Percent of urban
population, 2
reference years
• Urban population
density, 2
reference years

• Proportion of 6-
Level of Well-Being Access to 12 year old
education children who are
not in elementary
school, by sex,
latest
• Proportion of 13-
16 year olds who
are not in
secondary school,
by sex, latest

• Percent of
Access to households
health without sanitary
services toilets, latest
• Proportion of
children 0-5 years
old who are

39
DILG CONCISE ILLUSTRATIVE GUIDE FOR THE PREPARATION, REVIEW, MONITORING AND UPDATING OF THE CDP & LDIP

below normal
weight for their
age
• Proportion of
children under 5
years old who
died of illness, 2
reference years
• Proportion of
women who died
due to pregnancy,
2 reference years
• Proportion of 2
births attended by
skilled health
personnel to total
deliveries, latest
• Prevalence rates
of HIV/AIDS,
malaria,
tuberculosis, and
other diseases,
latest
• Death rates of
HIV/AIDS, malaria,
tuberculosis and
other diseases
latest

Social Justice Poverty • Proportion of

households whose
members eat less
than 3 full meals
a day, 2 reference
years
• Proportion of
population with
incomes below
poverty line
(consult data for
region)

INDICATOR OF LARGER SMALLER SPATIAL

CORE PLANNING
SECTOR / SUB-SECTOR DEVELOPMENT OR SPATIAL UNITS OF
CONCERNS AREA
UNDERDEVELOPMENT UNIT PLANNING AREA
1. SOCIAL 1 2 3 ...n

Social Justice • Proportion of

Security households who
are informal
settlers, 2
reference years

40
 CDP-LDIP PREP GUIDE

• Proportion of
households with
dwelling
structures unable
to protect them
from the
elements, 2
reference years
(focus on roofing
and outer walls)
• Proportion of
households with
members
victimized by
crime to total
households, 2
reference years
• Proportion of
households
without access to
level II and level
III water supply
system, 2
reference years

• Ratio of girls to
Gender boys in
Equality elementary,
secondary and
tertiary school,
latest
• Share of women
in non-
agricultural wage
employment
2. ECONOMIC

• Percent labor
General Labor and force employed by
employment sex, 2 reference
years
• Dependency ratio,
2 reference years
(youth and old
age)
• Percent of
workers in non-
agricultural
occupation, 2
reference years
• Proportion of
persons 15 years
old and above

41
DILG CONCISE ILLUSTRATIVE GUIDE FOR THE PREPARATION, REVIEW, MONITORING AND UPDATING OF THE CDP & LDIP

who are not

working but
actively seeking
work
• Proportion of
children below 15
years old who are
employed to the
total number of
employed persons

Agriculture • Volume/value of
Agricultural agricultural crop
Production production by
major crop, 2
reference years
• Volume/value of
fish production
inland & marine,
2 reference years
• Fishing HH/Total
HH

• Food self-
Food self- sufficiency index
sufficiency by food groups,
latest

INDICATOR OF LARGER SMALLER SPATIAL

CORE PLANNING
SECTOR / SUB-SECTOR DEVELOPMENT OR SPATIAL UNITS OF
CONCERNS AREA
UNDERDEVELOPMENT UNIT PLANNING AREA
2. ECONOMIC 1 2 3 ...n

Agriculture Forestry • Per capita value

of production
• Employment
contribution of
forestry in percent
of total
employment

Fishery • Per capita fish

consumption
(m.t./year)
• Ratio of
commercial
fishing production
versus municipal
fishing production

• Ratio of electrical
Industry energy
consumption in

42
 CDP-LDIP PREP GUIDE

industry &
commerce to total
consumption
• Volume/value or
mining/quarrying
production, 2
reference years

• Percentage of
Industry and Services Household households with
Income secondary/
tertiary source of
income
• Percentage of
households
engaged in main
source of income
only to total
number of
households

• Total number of
Services commercial
establishments, in
EEU, 2 reference
years
• Tourism receipts
per year
3. ENVIRONMENT &
NATURAL RESOURCES
• Change in stock
of forestry
Forest Ecosystem Resource resources:
Base and dipterocarp, tree
Land Use plantation,
mangroves, pine,
rattan (ha/year)
• Soil erosion in
upland areas
(mm/year)
• Forest land
classification
ratios (in %)
• Ratio of
population to
certified A&D
areas (in percent)
• Percentage of
timberland
proclaimed as
forest reserve

43
DILG CONCISE ILLUSTRATIVE GUIDE FOR THE PREPARATION, REVIEW, MONITORING AND UPDATING OF THE CDP & LDIP

Forest Ecosystem Tenure • Area covered by

Arrangement leases and
permits per
lessee/permittee

SMALLER SPATIAL
SECTOR / SUB-
UNITS OF
SECTOR INDICATOR OF LARGER
CORE PLANNING PLANNING AREA
DEVELOPMENT OR SPATIAL
3. ENVIRONMENT CONCERNS AREA 1 2 3 ...n
UNDERDEVELOPMENT UNIT
& NATURAL
RESOURCES
• Area covered by
CBFMA as percent of
Forest Ecosystem Tenure total forest area
Arrangement • Number of families
benefitting from
community-based
projects as percent of
total number of
families
• Growth rate of upland
population (per
annum)

Lowland/ • Extent of area

Agricultural Land Use and devoted to agriculture
Ecosystem Land in percent of A&D
Productivity • Land Use changes
(ha/year)
• Land productivity
(m.t./ha)
• Ratio of upland
devoted to agriculture
over total upland area
(in percent)
• Areas under IPM
relative to total
cropland (in percent)

• Cropland per
Other agricultural worker
Agricultural (ha)
Areas • Extent of agricultural
area under
mechanized
cultivation (in %)
• Ratio of agricultural
workers to the
number of
harvesters/threshers
servicing the area

44
 CDP-LDIP PREP GUIDE

• Extent of irrigable,
irrigated, rainfed, non-
irrigated and prime
lands converted to
non-agricultural uses
(ha/year)

• Extent of problem
Soil soils (hectarage) as
degradation percent of total land
area
• Erosion rates by land
use (mm/year)
• Area distribution of
erosion/degradation
classes as percent of
total land area
• Extent of soil
conservation (area
coverage) as percent
of eroded/degraded
soils
Fertilizer and • Nitrogen use per unit
Pesticides of agricultural output
Use (kg/m.t.)
• Pesticide use per unit
of agricultural output
(kg/m.t.)
• Inorganic fertilizer
used per unit area
(kg/ha)

SMALLER SPATIAL
SECTOR / SUB-
UNITS OF
SECTOR INDICATOR OF LARGER
CORE PLANNING PLANNING AREA
DEVELOPMENT OR SPATIAL
1. ENVIRONMENT CONCERNS AREA 1 2 3 ...n
UNDERDEVELOPMENT UNIT
& NATURAL
RESOURCES

Lowland/ Fertilizer and • Organic fertilizer used

Agricultural Pesticides per unit area (kg/ha)
Ecosystem Use • Ratio of organic to
inorganic fertilizer used

• Area by tenure of farm

Tenure per household, 2
reference years

Urban Ecosystem • Concentration of air

Air quality pollutants at selected
sites: number of
violations of standards
in a year per site

45
DILG CONCISE ILLUSTRATIVE GUIDE FOR THE PREPARATION, REVIEW, MONITORING AND UPDATING OF THE CDP & LDIP

• Incidence in a year per

site per 1000
inhabitants
• Emission levels of
different pollutants per
source

• Solid waste per capita in

Solid Waste m.t. or cu.m.
Management • Non-biodegradable
waste per capita (m.t. or
cu,m.)

• Waste generated per

Water capita per year (in m.t. or
Quality cu.m.)
• Effluents by source
(various units)
• Concentration of water
pollutants in selected
water bodies (various
units)

• Informal settler density

Land Use (informal settlers/total
population)
• % of total land area
occupied by squatters
• Rate of change in
industrial land use
(ha/year)

Coastal Marine • Mangrove area: annual

Ecosystem Resource rate of depletion
Base (ha/year)
• Seagrass beds: number
of species, 2 reference
year
• Seagrass beds: status or
condition, 2 reference
year
• Coral reef and coral
cover: status or
condition, 2 reference
years
• Area of fishing ground
relative to fishing
population (ha/1,000
population)

46
 CDP-LDIP PREP GUIDE

SMALLER SPATIAL
SECTOR / SUB-
UNITS OF
SECTOR
INDICATOR OF LARGER PLANNING AREA
CORE PLANNING
DEVELOPMENT OR SPATIAL 1 2 3 ...n
CONCERNS AREA
4. ENVIRONMENT & UNDERDEVELOPMENT UNIT
NATURAL
RESOURCES

Coastal Marine • Marine protected areas

Ecosystem Resource as percent of total area
Base of municipal waters
• Presence of indicator
fish species, 2 reference
years

• Concentration of key
Threats pollutants in selected
sites, 2 reference years
• Concentration of
coliform in selected
beaches (in ppm)
• Oil spills: number and
magnitude
• Rate of sedimentation
on selected bays
(mm/year)

• Physical quality
Freshwater Surface indicators, 2 reference
Ecosystem and Ground years
Water • Chemical quality
Quality indicators, 2 reference
years
• Biological quality
indicators, 2 reference
years
• Nitrate content of
selected rivers, 2
reference years

• Rating of the general

Quality of condition of freshwater
Major body, latest
Freshwater • Number of licensed
Bodies abstractors and volume
of abstraction in mcm
per annum
• Area of fishpens as
percent of area of
freshwater bodies
Critical resources

47
DILG CONCISE ILLUSTRATIVE GUIDE FOR THE PREPARATION, REVIEW, MONITORING AND UPDATING OF THE CDP & LDIP

Minerals and • Ratio of mining

Mines incidents and accidents
to total no. of mining
industry workers
• Incidence of illness due
to mining operations per
year
• Hectarage disturbed by
mining as percent of
total mineralized areas
• Estimates of mineral
deposits, by type of
minerals in metric tons

• Proportion of ecosystem
Biodiversity Ecosystem area highly threatened
Diversity species over total
number of known
species

SMALLER SPATIAL
SECTOR / SUB-
UNITS OF
SECTOR
INDICATOR OF LARGER PLANNING AREA
CORE PLANNING
DEVELOPMENT OR SPATIAL 1 2 3 ...
CONCERNS AREA
. ENVIRONMENT & UNDERDEVELOPMENT UNIT n
NATURAL
RESOURCES

• Number of sites
Biodiversity Ecosystem identified for migratory
Diversity birds per 100 hectares
• Number of exotic
species introduced over
total number of species
• Species diversity index

• Proportion of protected
Conservation
areas with illegal
Efforts
settlements to total
protected areas
• Level of ex situ
conservation in percent
• Critical habitat/areas
restored in ha/year
• Number of conservation
programs implemented
per five years
• Habitat size
restored/rehabilitated
per year

48
 CDP-LDIP PREP GUIDE

• Number of visitors in
protected areas per year
• Percent of protected
areas converted to
other uses
• Number of households
per square km. of
protected area
4. INFRASTRUCTURE

Social Support • Percent of HH served by

Utilities electric power
• Ratio of HH served by
piped water supply to
total urban HH

• No. of hospital beds per

Health 1000 population

• Classroom-to-pupil
Education ratio in elementary
schools; in secondary
schools

• No. of telephones/1000
Telecom-
urban HH
munications
• Ratio of postal
employees to total HH
population

• Road density (area

Economic Support Public covered by roads to
Roads total land area)

SMALLER SPATIAL
SECTOR / SUB-
UNITS OF
SECTOR
INDICATOR OF LARGER PLANNING AREA
CORE PLANNING
DEVELOPMENT OR SPATIAL 1 2 3 ...n
CONCERNS AREA
6. ENVIRONMENT & UNDERDEVELOPMENT UNIT
NATURAL
RESOURCES
• Total length of roads in
km/total land area of
Economic Support Public Roads A&D land
• Kilometer of road per
100 population
• Density of farm to
market roads (km/100 ha
of farmland)
• Percent of permanent
bridges

49
DILG CONCISE ILLUSTRATIVE GUIDE FOR THE PREPARATION, REVIEW, MONITORING AND UPDATING OF THE CDP & LDIP

• Total office floor space

Administrative Office Space per municipal employee
Support (in sq. m)

• No. of fire trucks per

Public Safety capita
• No. of police
outposts/1000
households
• No. of
prisoners/detention cell

• Percent occupancy of
Municipal municipal cemetery
Cemetery

• Total area of public

Open Space open space per 1000
inhabitants
• Total number of covered
courts/number of
barangays
5. INSTITUTIONAL

Local Fiscal • Total revenue per capita,

Management Revenue 2 reference years
Performance • Self-reliance index, 2
reference years
• Proportion of
delinquencies to total
RPT collected, 2
reference years
• Proportion of delinquent
RPT payers to total
listed taxpayers
• Ratio of proceeds from
special levies to total
revenues, 2 reference
years in previous and
present administrations
• Ratio of financial grants
or donations to total
LGU income, 2 reference
years in previous and
present administrations
Expenditure • Total public expenditure
on capital outlay per
capita, 2 reference years
• Ratio of municipal
government employees
to total no. of local
taxpayers

50
 CDP-LDIP PREP GUIDE

SMALLER SPATIAL
SECTOR / SUB-
UNITS OF
SECTOR
INDICATOR OF LARGER PLANNING AREA
CORE PLANNING
DEVELOPMENT OR SPATIAL 1 2 3 ...
CONCERNS AREA
. ENVIRONMENT UNDERDEVELOPMENT UNIT n
& NATURAL
RESOURCES

Local Fiscal • No. of big

Management RPT taxpayers who
account for 80% of
tax revenues
• Total revenue
collected as
percent of annual
collection target, 2
reference years
• Percent RPT
collected to total
potentially
collectible
• Amount of tax
arrears recovered
over total tax
arrears at the
beginning of
budget year

• Proportion of
Municipal receipts from
Enterprises municipal
enterprises to total
local revenues

• Proportion of
Organization and vacancies to total
Management plantilla positions,
previous and
present
administrations
• Ratio of casual
employees,
previous and
present
administrations
• Ratio of employees
to total no. of
personnel by type,
2 reference years
o Managerial
o Technical
o Administrative

51
DILG CONCISE ILLUSTRATIVE GUIDE FOR THE PREPARATION, REVIEW, MONITORING AND UPDATING OF THE CDP & LDIP

• Ratio of
confidential
positions to total
plantilla positions,
previous and
present
administrations

• Ratio of LDC
Public member NGOs and
Participation POs per capita,
previous and
present
administrations

Development • Proportion of
Administration Legislative “development”
Output legislation to total
sanggunian output,
last and current
administrations

• Total public debt

Credit incurred by the
Financing LGU per capita,
past and present
administrations

52
 CDP-LDIP PREP GUIDE

CDP Preparation Template Form a . tr ct re i t of PP per ector ( ong i t)

Sectoral Goal: To raise average income of farming households
Strategy 1 : Enhance farm-based income

NO. PROGRAM PROGRAM COMPONENTS ACTIONS/ INTERVENTIONS

1.0 Increased farm yield 1.1 Intensify production 1.1.1 Develop gravity irrigation
support services 1.1.2 Install communal pump irrigation
1.1.3 Increase water yield of aquifer
1.1.4 Promote use of certified seed

1.2 Improve post harvest 1.2.1 Construct mechanical dryers

facility 1.2.2 Regulate use of streets as solar dryers
1.2.3 Put up storage facilities
1.2.4 Encourage investments in processing
plants

2.0 Better prices of farm 2.1 Competitive pricing by 2.1.1 Encourage competition
produce traders 2.1.2 Regulate prices
2.1.3 Improve market infrastructure

2.2 Improve post harvest 2.2.1 Install internet-based access to

facility commodities market
2.2.2 Promote organization of coops

3.0 Agricultural product 3.1 Farming system research 3.1.1 Land suitability analysis
diversification 3.1.2 Pilot-test livestock & crop raising (silvi-
pasture)
3.1.3 Encourage utilization of idle lands
through imposition of idle land tax

3.2 Product research & 3.2.1 Utilize results of DOST studies

development 3.2.2 Hold agricultural & industrial fairs &
exhibits

4.0 Alternative livelihood 4.1 Raise awareness levels 4.1.1 Offer short courses on entrepreneurship
services 4.1.2 Conduct skills training on non-farm
trades & crafts
4.1.3 Adult literacy program

4.2 Attract investors in the area 4.2.1 Offer tax breaks

4.2.2 Improve transport and communication
facilities
4.2.3 Ensure peace and order
4.2.4 Maintain cleanliness & livability of the
environment

4.3 Foreign placement 4.3.1 Create PESO

assistance 4.3.2 Information exchange re: Job Orders
4.3.3 Establish linkages with employment
agencies

4.4 Facilitation of processing 4.4.1 Crackdown on illegal recruiters

4.4.2 Offer financial assistance
4.4.3 Public forum re: Experiences of
Returning OFWs

- LGU may choose to present a combined template of Forms 1.b and Form 2 as illustrated in Form
1.c

53
54

DILG CONCISE ILLUSTRATIVE GUIDE FOR THE PREPARATION, REVIEW, MONITORING AND UPDATING OF THE CDP & LDIP
CDP Preparation Template Form 2.b. Structured List of PPAs per Sector and development indicator (Long List)
 CDP Preparation Template Form 3.a. Ranked List of PPAs for Investment Programming

RANKED LIST OF PROPOSED PROJECTS FOR INVESTMENT PROGRAMMING

COST ESTIMATE Period of Implementation

RANK PROPOSED PROJECT/ FILE LOCATION / SECTOR INDIVIDUAL CUMULATIV From To

NO. E

10

CDP-LDIP PREP GUIDE

55
DILG CONCISE ILLUSTRATIVE GUIDE FOR THE PREPARATION, REVIEW, MONITORING AND UPDATING OF THE CDP & LDIP

CDP Preparation Template Form 3. . Pro e t rief for ea PPA

Box 5

CONTENTS OF PROJECT BRIEF

(With Guide Questions)

1. Name and Type of Project

• What is the working name of the project? It must be brief and catchy
• Short description must be added. How would it be described in 2 – 3 sentences?
• Project proponent or originator of idea
• In what category does it fall?
o Infrastructure & other physical capital?
o Public and private institutions?
o Social, local economic development, environmental management?
o Other?
• Where is the proposed location of the project?
• Are the project’s demands on the natural resources assured of being met for the life of the project?
• Would the project be at any risk from environmental or human-made hazards?
• Are the project’s demands on the natural resources assured of being met for the life of the project?
2. Activity Components
• State indicative duration of each component. What places, activities, and groups in the same area are targeted by the project?
• List the things that need to be done to produce the desired output
o Is a formal feasibility/ design study required?
• Who would manage implementation?
• What complementary measures are needed to ensure project success or reinforce the intended effects?
• Who would manage implementation?
3. Estimated Cost of Resource Inputs - What amount of implementation funding is required?
Classified into human power, materials, equipment, etc. by activity component, where applicable and in pesos if possible)
• Materials ______________
• Human Resources (Labor) ______________
• Equipment ______________
• Etc. ______________
TOTAL Php ____ __________
• What is the likely funding source?
• Is the project expected to be financially self-sustaining?
4. Justification of the Project
• Rationale / objective derived from the CLUP/ CDP
• Indicate the issue being addressed as identified in the plan
• What indicators of development does the proposed project address?
• On what other places is the project likely to have an effect, and how?
• What social and economic activities in what locations are likely to be affected by the project, and how?
• In what way, if any, is the proposed project related to other planned or on-going area development activities?
5. Target Beneficiaries
• Population Sectors or geographical areas
• Specify how men and women or specific areas will be benefited
6. Target Outputs or Success Indicators
• Quantify if possible
• Include indicator of success and means of verification
• What complementary measures are needed to ensure project success or reinforce the intended effects?
• Will the project lower transaction cost?
• Will the project reduce barriers to participation?
• Will the project increase local area employment?
• Will the project increase income multiplication?
• What will be the public revenue and expenditure impacts of the project?
• Is the project meant to improve area socio-economic performance in any other ways?
7. Possible Risks or External Factors that Could Frustrate the Realization of the Project
• May be natural, social, economic, etc.
8. Expected Private Sector Response
• Specify desired private sector participation, e.g., investments
• What are the expected responses by the private sector and other stakeholders to the changes that will result from the project?

56
 CDP Preparation Template Form 3. . Pro e tion of e Investment Finan ing Potential

FORM 12 – PROJECTION OF NEW INVESTMENT FINANCING POTENTIAL

ITEM NO. ITEM 1 4 5

1 Projected Revenue

2 Less: Projected Operating Expenditures

3 Sub – Total (Item 1 minus Item 2)

4 Less: Obligated Debt Service

5 New Investment Potential (Item 3 minus Item 4)

CDP-LDIP PREP GUIDE

57
58

DILG CONCISE ILLUSTRATIVE GUIDE FOR THE PREPARATION, REVIEW, MONITORING AND UPDATING OF THE CDP & LDIP
CDP Preparation Template Form 3.d. LDIP Summary Form
CDP Preparation Template Form 3.d. LDIP Summary Form
LOCAL DEVELOPMENT INVESTMENT PROGRAM
Summary Form

for Planning Period: 2017-2022

Years Covered: 2017-2019

City/Municipality: ___________________________________

o No Climate Change Expenditure (Please tick box if your LGU does not have any climate change expenditure)

Amount of Climate Change

Scehdule of Implementation Amount (In Thousand Pesos)
Expenditure (In Thousand Pesos)
AIP Implementing
Program/ Project/ Activity Funding Source
Reference Office/ Expected Output Maintenance
Description (2) (7) Climate
Code (1) Department (3) Personal and Other Capital Climate Climate
Completion Total Change
Start Date (4) Services Operating Outlay Change Change
Date (5) (8+9+10) Typology
(PS) (8) Expenses (10) Adaptation Mitigation
Code
(MOOE) (9)

Prepared by: Attested by: Certified correct and approved by the LDC:

Local Planning and Development Coordinator Local Budget Officer Local Treasurer City/Municipal Mayor/LDC Chairman
 CDP Preparation Template Form . nnual In e tment Pro ram IP

CDP-LDIP PREP GUIDE

59
DILG CONCISE ILLUSTRATIVE GUIDE FOR THE PREPARATION, REVIEW, MONITORING AND UPDATING OF THE CDP & LDIP

CDP Preparation Template Form 5.a. CapDev Agenda Summary Form

Priority Target Office Staff Desired outcome Implementation

HRD/Capacity Details
Sectoral Goal Development
Intervention (timeframe, who
are involved)

Example 1: Computerization of Treasurer’s Office, Revenue collection 1 year; treasury staff

real property tax Assessor’s Office from RPT increased
Increased own-source revenue by ___%

Example 2: Training of rural Rural health workers Upgraded knowledge 2 weeks, all rural
health workers and skills of rural health workers in the
Improve access of the poor to health workers on LGU
quality primary health care primary health care
services

Box 9
Example of Capacity Assessment for a Revenue Goal

The LCE together with other stakeholders sets a goal to double the amount of real property taxes
collected over the next 3 years. In the process of setting the goal, several issues were identified:

• There is no computer or software available in the LGU

• There are staff available but they lack computer skills
• The treasurer will retire at the end of this year
• The revenue code is out of date
• Many people are behind in their tax payments

Clearly, more detailed work will have to be done. There will be a need for budget estimates (cost
of computer, software and training). Other information, e.g. how can we find out about better tax
assessment methods? Why are people behind in paying their taxes? will be needed. One of the
managers will have to be assigned responsibility for developing an operational plan over the
coming months. Perhaps a small task force will be needed to gather more information and to follow
up on this work.

In preparing the operational plan for this result area, the following issues may have to be
addressed:

60
 CDP-LDIP PREP GUIDE

CDP Preparation Template Form 5. . Priority egi lative e uirement Summary Form
Sample Table of Legislative Requirements

Goal Objective Priority Programs and Legislative Time Committee

Sector Projects Requirements Frame Responsible

Improved local Increased Investment Promotion Amendment of 2007 Finance,

Economic economy investments Program Investment Code Appropriations,
Ways & Means

Improved capacity Reduced fiscal Revenue Enhancement Updating the 2008 Finance,
Institutional of LGU gap Program Revenue Code Appropriations,
Ways & Means

Improved marine Mangrove Rehabilitation 2008 Environment

Environment environment Program

61
62

DILG CONCISE ILLUSTRATIVE GUIDE FOR THE PREPARATION, REVIEW, MONITORING AND UPDATING OF THE CDP & LDIP
CDP Preparation Template Form 6.a. Annual Accomplishment Report

CY __________ ANNUAL/END-OF-TERM ACCOMPLISHMENT REPORT

Province/City/Municipality of ______________________________________

Programs and Projects per Output Indicators

Sector Target Accomplishment Beneficiary Area Covered Estimated Project Actual Disbursement
Cost (Php)
Sector

1. Social Sector

Nutri-Health Program § Number of barangays All barangays 50% of barangays Women and Children 50 % of 2 Million
covered by micro- barangays
nutrient
supplementation
§ Number of barangays
covered by nutrition
education
20% of barangays Women and children
50 % of
All barangays barangays 1.2 Million

Water Supply Project % of total number 5% of all households 10% of all households Urban Poor Barangay 5 Million
households covered Poblacion

2. Economic Sector
 CY __________ ANNUAL/END-OF-TERM ACCOMPLISHMENT REPORT

Province/City/Municipality of ______________________________________

Programs and Projects per Output Indicators

Sector Target Accomplishment Beneficiary Area Covered Estimated Project Actual Disbursement
Cost (Php)
Sector

3. Infrastructure

4. Environment

5. Institutional

CDP-LDIP PREP GUIDE

63
 CDP Preparation Template Form 6. . onitorin aluation trate Template
64

DILG CONCISE ILLUSTRATIVE GUIDE FOR THE PREPARATION, REVIEW, MONITORING AND UPDATING OF THE CDP & LDIP
M E STRATE Y

DATA SOURCE TO COLLECTION FRE UENCY RESPONSI ILITY

ASSESS METHODS CENTER
RESULTS PERFORMANCE TAR ETS FOR PERFROMANCE
INDICATORS INDICATORS
In ivi ual
eneficiarie
roup of
eneficiarie
or ani ation
partner
ocu ent etc

Goal/Impact (Long term) Mortality Rate of children Reduce children under-five LGU Health Office Document review Every three years and Monitoring Team
aged 1-5 (LGPMS mortality rate by two-thirds by at the end of nine
outcome indicator) 2015 (MDG Target no. 4) years
o Reduce infant mortality
(MDG no. 4)

Objective/ Outcome (Medium

term)
Every three years Monitoring Team

Outputs/ Deliverables/
Products and Services
delivered (Short term) Annual Monitoring Team

Activities (Ongoing) Every executive Department Heads

committee meeting

Inputs (Ongoing) Every executive Department Heads

committee meeting
 CDP-LDIP PREP GUIDE

Annex

C CDP AND LDIP

ANNEX CREVIEW PROCESS

CDP AND LDIP REVIEW PROCESS

A. Purpose of the Review:

• Assess the compliance of LGU’s CDP and LDIPs to the policy based budgeting
principles embodied in the CDP and LDIP guidelines.

• Determine the alignment with the PDPFP and PDIP with regards to:

o Development goals, objectives and strategies

o Physical framework
o Investment program

• Assess adherence of the preparation process, and content of the CDP and LDIP
submission vis-à-vis the requirements of policy based budgeting as embodied in
DILG’s guidelines.

• Provide a basis for improvements in in the CDP and LDIP.

• Establish a measure for the future qualification and provision of performance grants
and other support and assistance from the National Government.

B. Who Conducts the Review:

• For component LGUs, the PDC with the PPDO acting as technical secretariat.

• For highly urbanized and independent cities, the RDC with either NEDA & DILG ROs
acting as technical reviewers.

C. Components of the Review Process:

• Form Review - to ensure that the submitted CDP and LDIP documents are complete
(i.e. there are no missing pages and all the tables, maps and graphs are clear and in
place) and determine whether the draft CDP and LDIP conforms to the structure and
sequence described in the CDP and LDIP guidelines, and with other minimum form
requirements.

• Process Review - to determine whether the CDP and LDIP submission reflects the
organizational/institutional processes (including information sharing and consensus
building) and content generation linkages envisioned by the enhanced guidelines.

• Content Review - to assess the substance and logic of the CDP and LDIP submission
with emphasis on the clarity, comprehensiveness, and quality of various components
of the planning and investment programming processes.

• The individual results of the process and content reviews are the bases for feedback
and for revising or augmenting the CDP/LDIP submission, if necessary.

65
DILG CONCISE ILLUSTRATIVE GUIDE FOR THE PREPARATION, REVIEW, MONITORING AND UPDATING OF THE CDP & LDIP

D. CDP Form Review:

• Comp eteness: The availability and timeliness of the key documents and forms
comprising the CDP and LDIP.

• Structure nd se uence: The e tent to which the draft CDP follows the structure and
sequence prescribed in the enhanced CDP guidelines.

• inimum m ps nd t es: The presence (or absence) of selected maps and tables.

• Source c now ed ement: Proper acknowledgement of sourced material through

footnotes, endnotes, bibliographical entries, etc.

E. CDP Process Review:

• Le dership invo vement. The e tent to which the draft CDP reflects the vision,
policies and participation of the LGU leadership, especially the LCE, as indicated by:

o The participation of the LCE in the visioning activity and

o The provision of updates to the LDC.

• Consu t tion nd p rticip tion. The e tent to which the draft CDP reflects the views
and aspirations of LGU stakeholders and other constituents. This covers the amount
or frequency of consultation as well as the entities involved whether they constitute
the appropriate representatives of the sectors or interests concerned. Consultation
and participation is also distinguished according to horizontal and vertical linkages
horizontal linkages refer to consultation and participation within the municipal/city level
while vertical linkages refer to those with the barangay, and provincial levels.

o Number of hearings/consultations conducted

o Number and type of municipal/city-level sectoral agencies, offices or organizations
(public or private/NGO/PO) represented in various stages of CDP preparation and
o Number and type of barangay and provincial-level sectoral agencies, offices or
organizations (public or private/NGO/PO) represented in various stages of CDP
preparation.

F. CDP Content Review:

• u it of output nd n sis intern to e ch m in CDP component. This

concerns the quality of analytical inputs and corresponding outputs in each
component, relative to internal objectives and logic, as described in the enhanced CDP
guidelines.

o Vision o s nd o ectives: Characteristics of the development vision/goals and

objectives: long term, strategic, and realistic.

o Eco o ic profi e:

§ Description of location, land area and political subdivisions

66
 CDP-LDIP PREP GUIDE

§ Description of population and settlements relative to regional and provincial

conte t.
§ Description of e isting settlements and overall growth trends.
§ Description of land and water resources, land use potentials and
constraints, identification of protection areas, delineation of hazard zones.
§ Description of local economic structure, assessment of industries with
respect to potentials for contributing to local economic growth and declining
potentials.
§ Identification of local factors that may enhance efficiency and
competitiveness.
§ Description of e ternal linkages and internal circulation.
§ Identification of priority e ternal and internal linkages relative to population
and settlement trends, physical resources and protection areas and priority
industries.
§ Description of employment and unemployment conditions and family
income levels.
§ Description of levels and e tent of services (.e.g., health, education,
housing, utility and infrastructure, others).
§ Description of levels and e tent of poverty.
§ Description of e isting land uses, land use trends, and potential e pansion
areas.

o Str te ies nd PPAs:

§ ector-specific and/or location-specific characteristics of PPAs.

§ Presence of poverty reduction strategies/PPAs.
§ Presence of DRR strategies/PPAs.
§ Description of initial funding estimate and legislative requirements, if any.

• u it of in es etween components. This concerns the way the components

relate to each other in the overall planning process, which culminates in the identification
of PPAs. The CDP process is designed so that the output of each component feeds into
others and are eventually integrated in the development planning framework and serves
as basis for deriving issues, goals, objectives, targets, strategies and PPAs.

o Development framework

§ Consideration of spatial growth trends

§ Consideration for economic production potentials
§ Consideration of infrastructure requirements and
§ Consideration of environmental issues including DRR .

o Development issues, goals, objectives, targets

§ Issues based on planning analysis of ecological profile

§ Goals, objectives and targets as responses to identified issues and
§ Consistency with vision.

o trategies and PPAs

§ trategies link to specific goals/objectives.

67
DILG CONCISE ILLUSTRATIVE GUIDE FOR THE PREPARATION, REVIEW, MONITORING AND UPDATING OF THE CDP & LDIP

§ PPAs link to specific strategies.

. LDIP Form Review:

• Structure nd se uence: The e tent to which the draft LDIP follows the structure and
sequence prescribed in the LDIP guidelines.

• inimum m ps nd t es: The presence (or absence) of selected maps and tables.

• Source c now ed ement: Proper acknowledgement of sourced material through

footnotes, endnotes, bibliographical entries, etc.

. LDIP Process Review:

The quality of the underlying organizational/institutional structures and processes behind the
preparation of the draft LDIP. This covers the following indicators:

• E istence and quality of a LDIP committee.

o E istence of a formal and duly constituted LDIP committee

o LDIP committee membership consistent with the guidelines and
o Technical secretariat role of the unicipal/City Planning and Development Office
( /CPDO) in the LDIP committee.

• E istence and adherence to a LDIP preparation calendar.

• Promotion of public interest, consultation and participation.

o E istence of effective information dissemination

o Frequency of information dissemination and
o Conduct of public consultation during key stages of LDIP preparation.

• Content generation by appropriate bodies

o LDIP policy preparation by the LDIP committee

o LDIP prioritization criteria preparation by the LDIP committee and
o Revenue and e penditure projections preparation by finance group of LDIP
committee.

I. LDIP Content Review:

eeks to ensure that the PPAs are properly prioritized, ranked, and integrated into an effective
and realistic financing plan and investment schedule.

• Cover e of LDIP po icies:

o PPAs limited to those identified in the CDP

o Tie up of prioritization criteria to CDP objectives
o Coverage of revenue policies, use of debt, special assessments and other
financing tools and

68
 CDP-LDIP PREP GUIDE

o Use of cost recovery policies.

• u it of the LDIP fin ncin p n nd investment schedu e

o istorical analyses of revenue and e penditure projections

o Use of e pected trends and developments for revenue and e penditure
projections
o Investment financing needs covered by projected fund sources
o Total annual debt service within of total annual revenues
o Cost recovery provisions and
o Timing and staging considerations of investment phases.

. R tin Comp i nce Option :

• R tin S stem:

o Fu comp i nce: The CDP and LDIP fully or close to fully complies with the
planning and investment programming principles embodied in the RP .

o Su st nti comp i nce: The CDP and LDIP complies with the basic
requirements. hile the CDP and LDIP submission is capable of serving its overall
objectives, it is recommended that the parts that are found lacking be remedied or
revised during the finalization or in the ne t review, if not earlier.

o Deficient: The CDP and LDIP does not comply with the basic requirements and
its objectives are significantly compromised. In this case, it is recommended that
the deficient parts be revised or remedied as soon as possible.

• R tin Form Process nd Content:

o Fu Comp i nce: all rating criteria result in full compliance.

o Su st nti comp i nce: no deficiency is noted in each of the rating criteria.

o Deficient: at least one of the rating criteria is deficient.

• Over R tin :

o Fu comp i nce over : process and content reviews result in full compliance.

o Su st nti comp i nce over : At least one of the process and content
reviews result in substantial compliance but none are deficient.

o Deficient over : At least one of the process and content reviews is deficient.

69
DILG CONCISE ILLUSTRATIVE GUIDE FOR THE PREPARATION, REVIEW, MONITORING AND UPDATING OF THE CDP & LDIP

CONSOLIDA ED CO PRE ENSIVE DEVELOP EN PLAN CDP AND

LOCAL DEVELOP EN INVES EN PRO RA LDIP
EVAL A ION FOR

L N me:
Chec One:
€ unicip it € Cit

A. Form Presence of Re uired Forms nd Supportin P nnin Documents: Chec

A Items h t ve Been Su mitted. See Anne A.

FOR S AND DOC EN S Form No. es √

No X
A. Forms:
Local Development Indicator ystem/RaPID Form .b
tructured List of PPAs per ector Long List Form
Ranked List of PPAs for Investment Programming Form .a
Project riefs for Each PPA Form .b
Projection of New Investment Financing Potential Form .c
AIP ummary Form Form
CapDev Agenda ummary Form Form .a
Priority Legislative Requirements Form Form .b
Annual Accomplishment Report Form .a
onitoring and Evaluation trategy Form .b

. Other Documents
Provincial Development Physical Framework Plan
Comprehensive Land Use Plan/E isting Land Use ap
arangay Development Plans
arangay PPAs

70
 CDP-LDIP PREP GUIDE

Earthquake ap
cale: : ,
cale: : ,
Others (Please specify)

Flood ap
cale: : ,
cale: : ,
Others (Please specify)

torm urge ap
cale: : ,
cale: : ,
Others (Please specify)

Rain-Induced Landslide ap
cale: : ,
cale: : ,
Others (Please specify)

Other aps (Please specify):

cale: : ,
cale: : ,
Others (Please specify)

No. of Forms nd Documents Present:

No. of Forms nd Document n v i e:

B. Process Proof th t Ade u te nd Appropri te Consu t tions ve Been

Conducted s evidenced the inutes of the eetin :

71
DILG CONCISE ILLUSTRATIVE GUIDE FOR THE PREPARATION, REVIEW, MONITORING AND UPDATING OF THE CDP & LDIP

Consu t tion A end es √

No X
A. eeting of the Local Development Council on the CDP and CDP/LDIP
Preparation
PDO Reporting on the Eco Profiling
Project Call Long List of Projects
Prioritization of Projects
Approval of the CDP and LDIP.

B. eeting with the Provincial Planning and Development Office (PPDO)

Provincial and LGU Goals and trategies
Investment Programs and Programs, Projects and Activities (PPAs)

C. eeting/Consultations with ector Groups on CDP and LDIP

Economic ector profiling, project call, project prioritization and approval.
ocial ector profiling, project call, project prioritization and approval.
Environment ector profiling, project call, project prioritization and
approval.
Institutional ector profiling, project all, project prioritization and approval.
Physical/Infrastructure - profiling, project all, project prioritization and
approval.

D. eetings/Consultations with Local pecial odies and Advisory Councils

Local Finance Committee - profiling, project call, project prioritization and
approval.
Peace and Order Council - profiling, project call, project prioritization and
approval.
Local chool oard - profiling, project call, project prioritization and approval.
Local ealth oard - profiling, project call, project prioritization and approval.
Fisheries and Aquatic Resources anagement Council - profiling, project
call, project prioritization and approval (if applicable).
unicipal Disaster Risk Reduction and anagement Council - profiling,
project call, project prioritization and approval.

72
 CDP-LDIP PREP GUIDE

unicipal olid aste anagement Council - profiling, project call, project

prioritization and approval.
Other Advisory Councils and ectoral or Functional Committees ( pecify)
profiling, project call, project prioritization and approval.

Comp i nce with inimum Re uirement of Process: € es € No

Chec on one sed on the resu t of the ove chec ist.

C. Content u it of nd Consistenc in the Lo ic of the Lin es in the P nnin

Outputs:

Criteri es √ If No E p in.
No X
A. Consistenc of the CDP:

There is a logical and consistent linkage

between Columns , , and of Form .b
(Local Development Indicator ystem) and
Columns , , , and of Form ( tructured
List of PPAs per ector Long List). See
Anne B e .

B. Consistenc of the CDP nd LDIP:

The Comprehensive Development Plan (CDP)

Goals Goal Achievement atri (GA )
Results.

The LDIP PPAs are a subset of the CDP

PPAs.

C. Consistenc of the LDIP:

All Projects are rated higher the more sectors

or goals they apply to, benefit or cut across.

All prioritized projects are those with the

highest scores.

73
DILG CONCISE ILLUSTRATIVE GUIDE FOR THE PREPARATION, REVIEW, MONITORING AND UPDATING OF THE CDP & LDIP

Criteri es √ If No E p in.
No X

The Number of Project riefs on hand are

equal to the Number of Projects listed.

The Investment Financing Proposal is

available and provided.

Any surplus in the Investment Financing

Proposal is greater than the LDIP less the
aintenance and Other Operational E penses
( OOE) for each year. (IFP LDIP OOE)

The Annual Investment Plan for ear t is equal

to the Local Development Investment Program
for ear t (The AIP is the annual slice of the
LDIP.)

D. A i nment with CL P Provinci o s

Pro ects nd Pro r ms.

The vision, mission and goals of the LGU are

aligned with the vision, mission and goals of
the Province as provided in the PDPFP.

The CDP is overall supportive of the Provincial

Development Plan.
The LDIP of the LGU is complementary to the
Provincial DIP.

The projects in the LDIP of the LGU do not

overlap or duplicate the projects in the LDIP of
the Province.

The CDP is consistent with the Provincial

Physical Framework.
The plans and programs of the LGU are
harmonized or consistent with the
Comprehensive Land Use Plan.

Aligned is defined as does not conflict or neutral with at the minimum and compatible, supportive and
complementary at the desired level.

74
 CDP-LDIP PREP GUIDE

Criteri es √ If No E p in.
No X

Rem r s:

Prep red nd recommended for pprov :

Provinci P nnin nd Deve opment Coordin tor echnic Review Committee e d

Province of

D te dd mm :

Approved :

Vice overnor
Province of

D te dd mm :

75
76
Table 1: Integrated Form 1.b and 2 (for CDP Review Guide): STRUCTURED LONG LIST OF PPAS WITH LOCAL DEVELOPMENT INDICATORS
TABLE/RaPIDS
INDICATOR OF
SECTOR / SUB- GOALS STRATEGY/ CORE DEVELOPMENT OR
SECTOR OBJECTIVES CONCERNS UNDERDEVELOPMENT PROGRAM PROGRAM ACTIONS/ INTERVENTIONS
COMPONENTS
(LDIs/RaPIDS)
1.10 Intensify 1.11 Install communal
production pump irrigation
support
1. Increased farm services 1.12 Promote use of
yield certified seed
To raise
average income Enhance 1.20 Improve 1.21 Construct
of farming farm based post- harvest mechanical dryers
SECTOR: • Volume/value of
households income facility 1.22 Put up storage
ECONOMIC agricultural crop
Agricultural facilities
production by major crop,
Production 2. Agricultural 2.10 Farming 2.11 Land suitability
SubSector: 2 reference years product system analysis
Agriculture diversification research 2.12 Pilot-test livestock
& crop raising
(silvi-pasture)
2.13 Encourage
utilization of idle
lands through
imposition of idle
land tax
DILG CONCISE ILLUSTRATIVE GUIDE FOR THE PREPARATION, REVIEW, MONITORING AND UPDATING OF THE CDP & LDIP
CDP-LDIP PREP GUIDE

77
DILG CONCISE ILLUSTRATIVE GUIDE FOR THE PREPARATION, REVIEW, MONITORING AND UPDATING OF THE CDP & LDIP

78
CDP-LDIP PREP GUIDE

79
DILG CONCISE ILLUSTRATIVE GUIDE FOR THE PREPARATION, REVIEW, MONITORING AND UPDATING OF THE CDP & LDIP

80