Writing a journal manuscript
Writing a journal manuscript
Writing a journal manuscript
Publishing your results is a vital step in the research lifecycle and in your career as a scientist.
Publishing papers is necessary to get your work seen by the scientific community, to exchange
your ideas globally and to ensure you receive the recognition for your results. The following
information is designed to help you write the best paper possible by providing you with points
to consider, from your background reading and study design to structuring your manuscript and
figure preparation.
get the most out of your tables and figures so that they clearly represent your most
important results.
A good research paper begins long before you start writing. Giving some deep thought as to the
topic you are researching, the question you are answering and the study design, as well as
ensuring you follow appropriate research laws and regulations, all contribute to making a
publishable paper.
Study design
Reference managers
Making informed decisions about what to study, and defining your research question, even
within a predetermined field, is critical to a successful research career, and can be one of the
Being knowledgeable about the state of your field and up-to-date with recent developments
Identify top researchers in your field whose work you can follow and potentially
collaborate with
Explain to others why your work is important by being able to recount the bigger picture
Reading regularly is the most common way of identifying a good research question. This
enables you to keep up to date with recent advancements and identify certain issues or
Begin by searching for and reading literature in your field. Start with general interest journals,
but don’t limit yourself to journal publications only; you can also look for clues in the news or
on research blogs. Once you have identified a few interesting topics, you should be reading the
table of contents of journals and the abstracts of most articles in that subject area. Papers that
are directly related to your research you should read in their entirety.
TIP Keep an eye out for Review papers and special issues in your chosen subject area as they
TIP: Joining a journal club is a great way to read and dissect published papers in and around
your subject area. Usually consisting of 5-10 people from the same research group or institute
they meet to evaluate the good and bad points of the research presented in the paper. This not
only helps you keep up to date with the field but helps you become familiar with what is
necessary for a good paper which can help when you come to write your own.
If possible, communicate with some of the authors of these manuscripts via email or in person.
Going to conferences if possible is a great way to meet some of these authors. Often, talking
with the author of an important work in your research area will give you more ideas than just
Study design
You must have a good study design to get publishable results. When designing an experiment,
Do you have the required ethics and regulatory permissions? For example, if your experiment
will have animal subjects, you will probably need approval from your institution’s review board.
If you are publishing a clinical trial then you need register it in a clinical trials registry. Not
getting the correct permissions will stop you from publishing your work in reputable journals.
Will your experiment have enough statistical power to give useful results? Is your sample size
large enough to draw valid conclusions? Which statistical tests will you use for your analysis? If
you are not sure, consult a statistician; they can provide you with expert advice that may save
Reference managers
Reference managers (or reference formatting software such as BibTeX for LaTeX documents)
make it easy to organize and format citations. They can also assist with managing libraries
containing citations, PDFs, and image files by organizing important documents by subject and
allowing you to search your library using keywords. Add and organize any papers that are
relevant to your research as you read them. This will help you remember to appropriately cite
Some widely used reference management and formatting software applications are:
BibTeX
EndNote
Mendeley
Papers
RefWords
Zotero
ReadCube
TIP: When using a reference manager, make sure you have the correct style file for your target
journal. The reference style used by the journal can usually be found in the Instructions for
Authors on their website. Formatting references using a reference manager with a style file is
very simple.
It is helpful to familiarise yourself with the different types of articles published by journals.
Although it may appear there are a large number of types of articles published due to the wide
variety of names they are published under, most articles published are one of the following
types; Original Research, Review Articles, Short reports or Letters, Case Studies, Methodologies.
Original Research:
This is the most common type of journal manuscript used to publish full reports of data from
research. It may be called an Original Article, Research Article, Research, or just Article,
depending on the journal. The Original Research format is suitable for many different fields and
different types of studies. It includes full Introduction, Methods, Results, and Discussion
sections.
These papers communicate brief reports of data from original research that editors believe will
be interesting to many researchers, and that will likely stimulate further research in the field. As
they are relatively short the format is useful for scientists with results that are time sensitive
(for example, those in highly competitive or quickly-changing disciplines). This format often has
strict length limits, so some experimental details may not be published until the authors write a
full Original Research manuscript. These papers are also sometimes called Brief
communications.
Review Articles:
perspective on the state of the field and where it is heading. They are often written by leaders
in a particular discipline after invitation from the editors of a journal. Reviews are often widely
read (for example, by researchers looking for a full introduction to a field) and highly cited.
TIP: If you would like to write a Review but have not been invited by a journal, be sure to check
the journal website as some journals to not consider unsolicited Reviews. If the website does
not mention whether Reviews are commissioned it is wise to send a pre-submission enquiry
letter to the journal editor to propose your Review manuscript before you spend time writing it.
Case Studies:
These articles report specific instances of interesting phenomena. A goal of Case Studies is to
make other researchers aware of the possibility that a specific phenomenon might occur. This
type of study is often used in medicine to report the occurrence of previously unknown or
emerging pathologies.
Methodologies or Methods
These articles present a new experimental method, test or procedure. The method described
may either be completely new, or may offer a better version of an existing method. The article
paper which tells the story of your research. Researchers are busy people and so it is imperative
that research articles are quick and easy to read. For this reason papers generally follow a
standard structure which allows readers to easily find the information they are looking for. In
the next part of the course we will discuss the standard structure and what to include in each
section.
IMRaD refers to the standard structure of the body of research manuscripts (after the Title and
Abstract):
Introduction
Results
Not all journals use these section titles in this order, but most published articles have a
Provides a “map” so that readers can quickly find content of interest in any manuscript
Provides all content needed for the work to be replicated and reproduced
Although the sections of the journal manuscript are published in the order: Title, Abstract,
Introduction, Materials and Methods, Results, Discussion, and Conclusion, this is not the best
order for writing the sections of a manuscript. One recommended strategy is to write your
2. Results
These can be written first, as you are doing your experiments and collecting the results.
3. Introduction
4. Discussion
5. Conclusion
Write these sections next, once you have had a chance to analyse your results, have a sense of
their impact and have decided on the journal you think best suits the work
6. Title
7. Abstract
Write your Title and Abstract last as these are based on all the other sections.
Following this order will help you write a logical and consistent manuscript.
Use the different sections of a manuscript to ‘tell a story’ about your research and its
implications.
The title of your manuscript is usually the first introduction readers (and reviewers) have to
your work. Therefore, you must select a title that grabs attention, accurately describes the
Be concise
Attract readers
Writing a good title for your manuscript can be challenging. First, list the topics covered by the
manuscript. Try to put all of the topics together in the title using as few words as possible. A
title that is too long will seem clumsy, annoy readers, and probably not meet journal
requirements.
Example:
Does Vaccinating Children and Adolescents with Inactivated Influenza Virus Inhibit the Spread
This title doesn’t give enough information about what makes the manuscript interesting.
Trial
This is an effective title. It is short, easy to understand, and conveys the important aspects of
the research.
Think about why your research will be of interest to other scientists. This should be related to
the reason you decided to study the topic. If your title makes this clear, it will likely attract more
colleagues their opinion. Spending the time needed to do this will result in a better title.
Many readers will only read the Abstract of your manuscript. Therefore, it has to be able to
stand alone. In most cases the abstract is the only part of your article that appears in indexing
databases such as Web of Science or PubMed and so will be the most accessed part of your
article; making a good impression will encourage researchers to read your full paper.
A well written abstract can also help speed up the peer-review process. During peer review,
referees are usually only sent the abstract when invited to review the paper. Therefore, the
abstract needs to contain enough information about the paper to allow referees to make a
judgement as to whether they have enough expertise to review the paper and be engaging
helps them decide whether they want to read the rest of the paper. Make sure you follow the
TIP: Journals often set a maximum word count for Abstracts, often 250 words, and no citations.
Keywords are a tool to help indexers and search engines find relevant papers. If database
search engines can find your journal manuscript, readers will be able to find it too. This will
increase the number of people reading your manuscript, and likely lead to more citations.
Examples:
Better keywords: single-molecule interaction, Kerr effect, carbon nanotubes, energy level
structure
signaling
transitions
Introduction
The Introduction should provide readers with the background information needed to
understand your study, and the reasons why you conducted your experiments. The
Well balanced: If experiments have found conflicting results on a question, have you cited
Current: Every field is different, but you should aim to cite references that are not more than 10
years old if possible. Although be sure to cite the first discovery or mention in the literature
Relevant: This is the most important requirement. The studies you cite should be strongly
TIP: Do not write a literature review in your Introduction, but do cite reviews where readers can
Once you have provided background material and stated the problem or question for your
study, tell the reader the purpose of your study. Usually the reason is to fill a gap in the
of a study could be to test the efficacy and safety of the drug in the second population.
The final thing to include at the end of your Introduction is a clear and exact statement of your
study aims. You might also explain in a sentence or two how you conducted the study.
This section provides the reader with all the details of how you conducted your study. You
should:
Describe new methods in enough detail that another researcher can reproduce your
experiment
Describe established methods briefly, and simply cite a reference where readers can
TIP: Check the ‘Instructions for Authors’ for your target journal to see how manuscripts should
present the Materials and Methods. Also, as another guide, look at previously published papers
Results
In the Results section, simply state what you found, but do not interpret the results or discuss
their implications.
As in the Materials and Methods section, use subheadings to separate the results of different
experiments.
Results should be presented in a logical order. In general this will be in order of importance, not
necessarily the order in which the experiments were performed. Use the past tense to describe
your results; however, refer to figures and tables in the present tense.
Do not duplicate data among figures, tables, and text. A common mistake is to re-state much of
the data from a table in the text of the manuscript. Instead, use the text to summarize what the
reader will find in the table, or mention one or two of the most important data points. It is
Include the results of statistical analyses in the text, usually by providing p values wherever
TIP: There is a famous saying in English: “A picture is worth a thousand words.” This means that,
sometimes, an image can explain your findings far better than text could. So make good use of
figures and tables in your manuscript! However, avoid including redundant figures and tables
(e.g. two showing the same thing in a different format), or using figures and tables where it
would be better to just include the information in the text (e.g. where there is not enough data
Your Discussion and Conclusions sections should answer the question: What do your results
mean?
In other words, the majority of the Discussion and Conclusions sections should be an
Mention any inconclusive results and explain them as best you can. You may suggest additional
Briefly describe the limitations of your study to show reviewers and readers that you have
considered your experiment’s weaknesses. Many researchers are hesitant to do this as they
feel it highlights the weaknesses in their research to the editor and reviewer. However doing
this actually makes a positive impression of your paper as it makes it clear that you have an in
depth understanding of your topic and can think objectively of your research.
Discuss what your results may mean for researchers in the same field as you, researchers in
other fields, and the general public. How could your findings be applied?
If your findings are preliminary, suggest future studies that need to be carried out.
At the end of your Discussion and Conclusions sections, state your main conclusions once again.
Figures and tables (display items) are often the quickest way to communicate large amounts of
Many readers will only look at your display items without reading the main text of your
manuscript. Therefore, ensure your display items can stand alone from the text and
attractive display items will hold the interest of readers, compel them to take time to
understand a figure and can even entice them to read your full manuscript.
Finally, high-quality display items give your work a professional appearance. Readers will
assume that a professional-looking manuscript contains good quality science. Thus readers may
be more likely to trust your results and your interpretation of those results.
When deciding which of your results to present as display items consider the following
questions:
Are there any data that readers might rather see as a display item rather than text?
Do your figures supplement the text and not just repeat what you have already stated?
Have you put data into a table that could easily be explained in the text such as simple statistics
or p values?
Tables
Tables are a concise and effective way to present large amounts of data. You should design
them carefully so that you clearly communicate your results to busy researchers.
Figures
Images
Data plots
Maps
Schematics
Just like tables all figures need to have a clear and concise legend caption to
accompany them.
Images
Images help readers visualize the information you are trying to convey.
Data plots
Data plots convey large quantities of data quickly. The goal is often to show
details about the individual data points are often omitted to place emphasis
Maps
Maps are important for putting field work in the context of the location where it was
performed. A good map will help your reader understand how the site affects your study.
Moreover, it will help other researchers reproduce your work or find other locations with
Schematics
Schematics help identify the key parts to a system or process. They should highlight only the
key elements because adding unimportant items may clutter the image. A schematic only
includes the drawings the author chooses, offering a degree of flexibility not offered by images.
They can also be used in situations where it is difficult or impossible to capture an image. Below
is a schematic explaining how nanotubes could be used to harvest energy from a fluid.
TIP: it’s important to consider how your figures will look in print as well as online. A resolution of
72 ppi is sufficient for online publication whilst in print 100 ppi is recommended. You can adjust
the resolution of your figure within the original program you used to create it at the time you
TIP: There are two main colour models; RGB which stands for red, green, blue and CMYK or
cyan, magenta, yellow and black. Most microscopes will take images using the RGB however
CMYK is the standard used for printing so it is important to check that your figures will display
You should never knowingly manipulate your images to change or improve you results. To avoid
inadvertent manipulation you should only minimally process your figures before submitting
them to the journal, your submitted images should faithfully represent the original image files.
Adjusting the brightness or contrast of an image, in fluorescent microscopy for example, is only
The cropping of images in the creation of figures should be avoided unless it significantly
improves the clarity of conciseness of presentation. Be sure that the cropping does not exclude
any necessary information for the understanding of the figure, such as molecular markers in
electrophoresis gels.
TIP: keep copies of the original images, files and metadata used to create your figures as these
Acknowledgments
This usually follows the Discussion and Conclusions sections. Its purpose is to thank all of the
people who helped with the research but did not qualify for authorship (check the target
journal’s Instructions for Authors for authorship guidelines). Acknowledge anyone who
provided intellectual assistance, technical help (including with writing and editing), or special
equipment or materials.
TIP: The International Committee of Medical Journal Editors has detailed guidelines on who to
list as an author and who to include in the Acknowledgments that are useful for scientists in all
fields.
Some journals request that you use this section to provide information about funding by
including specific grant numbers and titles. Check your target journal’s instruction for authors
for specific instructions. If you need to include funding information, list the name(s) of the
funding organization(s) in full, and identify which authors received funding for what.
References
As references have an important role in many parts of a manuscript, failure to sufficiently cite
other work can reduce your chances of being published. Every statement of fact or description
TIP: Be sure to cite publications whose results disagree with yours. Not citing conflicting work
will make readers wonder whether you are really familiar with the research literature. Citing
conflicting work is also a chance to explain why you think your results are different.
It is also important to be concise. You need to meet all the above needs without overwhelming
the reader with too many references—only the most relevant and recent articles need to be
cited. There is no correct number of references for a manuscript, but be sure to check the
TIP: Never cite a publication based on what you have read in a different publication (such as a
review), or based only on the publication’s abstract. These may mislead you and readers. Read
the publication itself before you cite it, and then check the accuracy of the citation again before
When you refer to an idea or theory, it is important to let your readers know which
researcher(s) came up with the idea. By citing publications that have influenced your own work,
you give credit to the authors and help others evaluate the importance of particular
Justify claims
In a scientific manuscript, all statements must be supported with evidence. This evidence can
come from the results of the current research, common knowledge, or from previous
publications. A citation after a claim makes it clear which previous study supports the claim.
By highlighting related works, citations help show how a manuscript fits into the bigger picture
of scientific research. When readers understand what previous studies found and what puzzles
or controversies your study relates to, they will better understand the meaning of your work.
Citations show that other researchers are performing work similar to your own. Having current
citations will help journal editors see that there is a potential audience for your manuscript.
which can be found in the Instructions for Authors. This will speed up the submission
process because the journal’s editorial team will not have to send your manuscript back to you
for formatting. It can also increase your chances of success because you will not omit materials
TIP: Before writing a complete draft of your manuscript, it is a good idea to select an initial
target journal. Read the formatting requirements for the journal on its website, then write your
draft. This could save you a lot of time, as you won’t have to reformat an already-written
Review all guidelines and ensure that your manuscript meets them. Have you:
Obeyed all word and character limits (title, running title, abstract, manuscript text)?
Inserted figures in the correct location (in text, end of manuscript, separate files)?
Used the correct file format for your images (.jpg, .png, .pdf, .ppt)?
TIP: Some journals provide templates to assist authors. Also look for template style files for use