A Real Intertemporal Model With Investment
A Real Intertemporal Model With Investment
CHAPTER 11
The Complete Real Inter-temporal Model
▶ When G increases, this will have two effects, one on output supply and one on output
demand.
▶ We have determined the effect on output demand, which is a shift to the right in the
output demand curve, where the horizontal shift is equal to the increase in G.
▶ Since lifetime wealth decreases due to the increase in the present value of taxes, leisure
will decrease (leisure is a normal good) for the representative consumer, given the current
real wage, and so the labor supply curve shifts to the right, and the output supply curve
also shifts to the right .
▶ Since both output demand and output supply curves shift to the right, current aggregate
output Y must increase.
▶ It may appear that the real interest rate may rise or fall; however, there is strong
theoretical support for an increase in the real interest rate.
▶ This is because the temporary increase in government spending should lead to only a
small decrease in lifetime wealth for the consumer, which will produce a small effect on
labor supply.
▶ Therefore, there should be only a small shift to the right in the Y s curve.
▶ Since shift in output demand must be larger than the shift in output supply, the real
interest rate must rise.
▶ Total government expenditure multiplier: The ratio of the equilibrium increase in real
output to the increase in government spending
▶ Since the output demand curve shifted to the right by the increase in government
spending, the equilibrium increase in current output must be less than the increase in
government spending.
▶ The total multiplier is less than 1
▶ It will become smaller as:
1 The size of the wealth effect on labor supply falls (this makes the rightward shift in the
output supply curve smaller)
2 The intertemporal substitution effect of the real interest rate on labor supply falls (this
makes the output supply curve steeper)
▶ On the demand side of the goods market, it is the crowding out of private consumption
and investment expenditure that causes the total government expenditure multiplier to be
less than one here.
▶ On the supply side, output increases because of two effects on labor supply:
1 There is a negative wealth effect on leisure from the increase in lifetime tax liabilities.
2 The increase in the real interest rate makes future leisure cheaper relative to current leisure,
and there is a further increase in labor supply.
▶ Basic Keynesian analysis neglects both the crowding-out effects and the effects on the
supply side of the goods market.
▶ The next step is to work through the effects of the increase in the real interest rate for
the labor market.
▶ Given the initial interest rate r1 , the labor supply curve shifts from N1s (r1 ) to N2s (r1 ),
because of the negative wealth effect arising from the increase in the present value of
taxes.
▶ With an increase in the equilibrium real interest rate to r2 , the labor supply curve shifts
further to the right, to N2s (r2).
▶ Therefore, the equilibrium real wage falls from w1 to w2 .
▶ What this analysis tells us is that increased temporary government spending, although it
leads to higher aggregate output, comes at a cost.
▶ With higher current government spending, the representative consumer consumes less and
takes less leisure, and he or she also faces a lower real wage rate.
▶ Further, current investment spending is lower, which implies that the capital stock will be
lower in the future, and the future capacity of the economy for producing goods will be
lower.
▶ In our figure, current consumption must fall, because the real interest rate has increased.
▶ The effects on investment appear to be ambiguous, because the decrease in K causes
investment to increase, while the increase in the equilibrium real interest rate causes
investment to fall.
▶ However, investment must rise, because less capital would otherwise cause
ever-decreasing investment, which would be inconsistent with the fact that the marginal
product of capital rises as the quantity of capital falls.
▶ In other words, as the quantity of capital falls, the marginal product of capital rises,
making the return on investment very high, so that ultimately investment must increase if
the capital stock decreases.
▶ Because of the increase in the real interest rate, there is intertemporal substitution of
leisure, with the representative consumer working harder in the current period for each
current real wage w.
▶ Therefore, the labor supply curve shifts to the right
▶ This reinforces the effect of the increase in labor demand on the real wage, and so the
real wage must fall, from w1 to w2 .
▶ The equilibrium effect on the quantity of labor is ambiguous, because the effect on labor
demand and on labor supply work in opposite directions on the quantity of employment.
▶ In our figure, we show employment falling from N1 to N2 .
▶ Now, suppose that we interpret these results in terms of the macroeconomic effects of a
natural disaster or a war that destroys part of the nation’s capital stock.
▶ The model shows that there are two effects on the quantity of output.
▶ The lower quantity of capital implies that less output can be produced for a given
quantity of labor input, which tends to reduce output.
▶ However, the lower quantity of capital acts to increase investment to replace the
destroyed capital, which tends to increase output.
▶ Theoretically, it is not clear whether output increases or decreases, and there appear to be
empirical cases in which the output supply and output demand effects roughly cancel, for
example during and after large natural disasters such as the Mississippi floods in 1993,
and Hurricane Katrina in 2005 or the 2004 Indian ocean tsunami.
▶ In the labor market, the decrease in the real interest rate causes intertemporal
substitution of leisure between the current and future periods, with current leisure
increasing, and so the labor supply curve shifts to the left
▶ In equilibrium, the real wage must increase from w1 to w2
▶ However, the net effect on the equilibrium quantity of employment is ambiguous.
▶ Empirically, however, the effect of the real interest rate on labor supply is small and as in
our figure, employment rises from N1 to N2 .
▶ When total factor productivity increases, this increases the current demand for labor,
which raises the market real wage.
▶ With the real wage increase, workers are willing to supply more labor, employment
increases, and output increases.
▶ In the goods market, the increased supply of goods decreases the market real interest
rate, which results in an increased demand for investment goods and consumption goods,
so that the demand for goods rises to meet the increased supply of goods on the market.
▶ Further, the increase in current income increases consumption.
▶ The anticipation of future events can have important macroeconomic consequences in the
present, as when an increase in total factor productivity is expected to happen in the
future.
▶ For example, firms might learn of a new invention, such as the design for a new
production process, which is not available currently but will come on line in the future.
▶ News about future events and the influence of this news has played an important role in
macroeconomic theory.
▶ For example, Keynes had interest in the “animal spirits” of financial market investors and
the influence of swings in investor sentiment on economic activity.
▶ Indeed, the stock market represents a forum in which people take bets on the future
health of firms in the economy.
▶ Therefore, news which is informative about future productivity will tend to be reflected
first in stock prices.
▶ In financial market theory, stock prices are typically the reflection of the average stock
market participant’s views on firms’ future dividends, which are in good part determined
by the future total factor productivity of firms.
▶ Empirical research in macroeconomics supports the view that news about future events is
a key determinant of aggregate economic activity in the present.