Internship Report
Internship Report
At
BY
A. VARUN SAI
160721736302
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
To make an effort over this period can be successful by the advice and support
of many well
wishers. We avail this opportunity to express our gratitude and appreciation to
all of them.
We express thanks to internal guide for internship report Dr. M Uday Kumar
valuable time in conducting presentations and timely suggestions during our
internship report period.
We are thankful to Dr. A Rajasekhar, HOS of MECH Department for the
guidance, valuable support and useful suggestions given to us during the course
of our internship report.
We would like to express our profound respect to Professor Dr. Prabhu G
Benakop, Principal, Methodist College of Engineering and Technology for his
useful suggestions during the course of internship report.
We extend our sincere thanks to staff of Mechanical Engineering Department
and all our friends for their good wishes, their helping hands and constructive
criticism, which led the successful completion of our internship report.
We immensely indebted to our parents, brothers and sisters for their love and
unshakable belief in us and understanding and ever-decreasing grudges for not
spending time more often.
Finally, we thank all those who directly and indirectly helped us in this regard I
apologize for not listing everyone.
A. VARUN SAI
160721736302
CHAPTER 1
INTRODUCTION
1.1. ROCKET PROPULSION
Rocket propulsion is the mechanism by which a rocket is propelled forward by
expelling mass at high velocity in the opposite direction, based on Newton's
third law of motion, which states that for every action, there is an equal and
opposite reaction.
Rocket propulsion systems may be classified in a number ways, for example,
according to energy source type (chemical, nuclear, or solar) or by their basic
function (booster stage, sustainer or upper stages, attitude control, orbit station
keeping, etc.) rocket propulsion systems may be classified in a number ways, for
example, according to energy source type (chemical, nuclear, or solar) or by
their basic function (booster stage, sustainer or upper stages, attitude control,
orbit station keeping, etc.)
Rocket propulsion systems may be classified in a number ways, for example,
according to energy source type (chemical, nuclear, or solar) or by their basic
function (booster stage, sustainer or upper stages, attitude control, orbit station
keeping, etc.)
Chemical Rocket Propulsion
Energy from the combustion reaction of chemical propellants, usually a fuel and
gases are sub sequently expanded in a supersonic nozzle and accelerated to high
velocities (1800 to 4300 m/sec or 5900 to 14,100 ft/sec). Since such gas
temperatures are about twice the melting point of steel, it is necessary to cool or
insulate all the surfaces and structures that are exposed to the hot gases.
According to the physical state of the stored propellant, there are several
different classes of chemical rocket propulsion devices.
FIGURE1–3. Schematic diagram of a typical hybrid rocket engine. The relative positions of the
oxidizer tank, high-pressure gas tank, and the fuel chamber with its nozzle depend on the particular
vehicle design.
Nuclear Rocket Engines
These are basically a type of liquid propellant rocket engine where the power
input comes from a single nuclear reactor and not from any chemical
combustion. During the 1960s an experimental rocket engine with a nuclear
fission graphite reactor was built and ground tested with liquid hydrogen as the
propellant. It delivered an equivalent altitude specific impulse (this performance
parameter is explained in Chapter 2) of 848 sec, a thrust of over 40,000 lbf at a
nuclear reactor power level of 4100 MW with a hydrogen temperature of 2500
K. No further ground tests of nuclear fission rocket engines have been
undertaken. Public concerns about any ground and/or flight accident with the
inadvertent spreading of radioactive materials in the Earth’s environment have
caused the termination of nuclear rocket engine work. It is unlikely that nuclear
rocket engines will be developed in the next few decades.
Electric Rocket Propulsion
Electric propulsion has been attractive because of its comparatively high perfor-
mance, producing desired amounts thrust with moderately low propellant
utilization, but they are limited to relatively low thrusts by existing electrical
power supplies. This type of propulsion is much too low for earth launches and
atmospheric fight because it requires rather massive and relatively inefficient
power sources (but in spacecraft they can often be shared with other
subsystems). Unlike chemical propulsion, electric propulsion utilizes energy
sources (nuclear, solar radiation, or batteries) not contained in the propellant
being utilized. The thrust is usually quite low, levels typical of orbit
maintenance (0.005 to 1 N). In order to accomplish significant increases in
vehicle velocity, it is necessary to apply such low thrusts (and their small
accelerations) during times considerably longer than with chemical propulsion,
some for months and even years.
The total impulse It is found from the thrust force F (which may
vary with time) integrated over the time of its application t:
The specific impulse Is represents the thrust per unit propellant “weight” flow
rate. It is an important figure of merit of the performance of any rocket
propulsion system, a concept similar to miles per gallon
parameter as applied to automobiles. A higher number
often indicates better performance.
In actual rocket nozzles, the exhaust velocity is not really uniform over the
entire exit cross section and such velocity profiles are difficult to measure
accurately. A uniform axial velocity c is assumed for all calculations which
employ one-dimensional problem descriptions. This effective exhaust velocity c
represents an average or mass-equivalent velocity at which propellant is being
ejected from the rocket vehicle. It is defined as
c =Isg0 = F∕ ̇m (2-2)
The mass ratio MR of the total vehicle or of a particular vehicle stage or of the
propulsion system itself is defined to be the final mass mf divided by the mass
before rocket operation, m0. Here, mf consists of the mass of the vehicle or
stage after the rocket has ceased to operate when all the useful propellant mass
mp has been consumed and ejected.
MR =mf∕m0
2.2. THRUST
Thrust is the force produced by the rocket propulsion system acting at the
vehicle’s centre of mass. It is a reaction force, experienced by vehicle’s structure
from the ejection of propellant at high velocities (the same phenomenon that
pushes a garden hose backward or makes a gun recoil). Momentum is a vector
quantity defined as the product of mass times its vector velocity. In rocket
propulsion, relatively small amounts of propellant mass carried within the
vehicle are ejected at high velocities.
F = ̇m𝑣2 +p2A2
2.3. EXHAUST VELOCITY
The effective exhaust velocity as defined by Eq. 2–2 applies to all mass-
expulsion thrusters. From Eq. 2–13 and for constant propellant mass flow it can
be modified to give the equation below. As before, g0 is a constant whose
numerical value equals the average acceleration of gravity at sea level and does
not vary with altitude.
c =𝑣2 +(p2 −p3) A2∕ ̇m = Isg0
The characteristic velocity c∗, pronounced “cee-star,” is a term frequently used
in the rocket propulsion literature. It is defined as
c∗=p1At∕̇m
CHAPTER 3
3.5 Casing
The casing may be constructed from a range of materials. Cardboard is used for
small black powder model motors, whereas aluminium is used for larger
composite-fuel hobby motors. Steel was used for the space shuttle boosters.
Filament-wound graphite epoxy casings are used for high-performance motors.
The casing must be designed to withstand the pressure and resulting stresses of
the rocket motor, possibly at elevated temperature. For design, the casing is
considered a pressure vessel.
To protect the casing from corrosive hot gases, a sacrificial thermal liner on the
inside of the casing is often implemented, which ablates to prolong the life of
the motor casing.
3.6 Nozzle
A convergent-divergent design accelerates the exhaust gas out of the nozzle to
produce thrust. The nozzle must be constructed from a material that can
withstand the heat of the combustion gas flow. Often, heat-resistant carbon-
based materials are used, such as amorphous graphite or carbon-carbon.
Some designs include directional control of the exhaust. This can be
accomplished by gimballing the nozzle, as in the Space Shuttle SRBs, by the
use of jet vanes in the exhaust as in the V-2 rocket, or by liquid injection thrust
vectoring (LITV).
LITV consists of injecting a liquid into the exhaust stream after the nozzle
throat. The liquid then vaporizes, and in most cases chemically reacts, adding
mass flow to one side of the exhaust stream and thus providing a control
moment. For example, the Titan IIIC solid boosters injected nitrogen
tetroxide for LITV; the tanks can be seen on the sides of the rocket between the
main centre stage and the boosters.[18]
An early Minuteman first stage used a single motor with four gimballed nozzles
to provide pitch, yaw, and roll control.