Scribd
Upload
5 views3 pages

Assesment

assesment

Uploaded by

amirbxr2003
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
5 views3 pages

Assesment

assesment

Uploaded by

amirbxr2003
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 3

Assignment by ERIC Robotics

● DataSet - Real-life-industrial-dataset-of-casting-products

The dataset I’ve chosen consists of images of casting products, categorized


and organized in directories labeled "Defective" and "Ok." Each image is
stored in the appropriate folder based on its classification, allowing for easy
access to labeled data for training a machine learning model. This setup is
ideal for building a system to automatically classify casting products as either
defective or acceptable, based on their visual characteristics.

Structure of Data Folder:

● VGG16 Fine Tuning:

To classify images into two categories, we leverage the pre-trained VGG16


model, which already has millions of parameters fine-tuned for feature
detection. By freezing its earlier layers to retain learned features and only
adjusting the outermost layers, we adapt VGG16 to accurately predict our
specific two-class output. This approach capitalizes on VGG16's robust
feature extraction while optimizing it for binary classification.

● Preprocessing of Data
To prepare our data, we first resize the input images to the required
dimensions of (224 x 224 x 3) to match the input size for VGG16. Since the
images are already in RGB format with three channels, no additional channel
adjustments are necessary.

We use `ImageDataGenerator` for data augmentation, which enhances the


model's ability to generalize by artificially increasing the dataset through
transformations such as rotation, flipping, zooming, and shifting. This process
introduces subtle variations in the images, helping the model to learn more
robust features and improve performance on unseen data.

● Model Evaluation
To evaluate our model's performance, we plot both loss and accuracy over
epochs, providing a visual understanding of how well the model is learning
and whether it's experiencing overfitting or underfitting. Additionally, we
generate a classification report, which includes metrics like precision, recall,
and F1-score for each class.

These metrics offer deeper insights:

● Precision shows the accuracy of positive predictions, indicating how


many of the predicted positives are actually correct.
● Recall indicates the model’s ability to identify all relevant instances,
showing how well it captures actual positives.
● F1-Score balances precision and recall, giving a single metric to
evaluate the model's performance on imbalanced datasets.
●

Together, these metrics provide a comprehensive assessment of the model’s


effectiveness and reliability in predicting our two categories.

You might also like