Crusades reltionship with Muslims and christians

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 2

They weren't all battles and bloodshed.

There was also


coexistence, political compromise, trade, scientific
exchange—even love.
There were no doubt wars and bloodshed, but that wasn’t the only
or dominant story. There was also coexistence, political
compromise, trade, scientific exchange, love. We have poetry and
chronicles with evidence of mixed marriages.

So they were actually sharing sacred sites that, in theory, they


were supposed to be fighting over?

Back then, there was a more collective approach to sanctity of


space. The Islamic theory said, “we should fight these people and
protect the Holy Land.” But in practice, they were willing to share.
We know for a fact that when the crusaders came, most Muslims did
not raise a finger. And to a large extent, the crusaders didn’t
interfere with Muslim religious space.
No sooner did the crusaders infiltrate, they were accepted into the
political landscape as any others that came: with alliances, wars,
treaties, commerce. We have letters from Saladin to the king of
Jerusalem, Baldwin III, that convey friendship and deep alliances.
The relationship wasn’t dogmatic, it was pragmatic.
What did Muslims think of Templar knights?
PC: They were aware of the Templars’ special status as elite holy
warriors and considered them their most fearsome Frankish
opponents. They also saw them as principled, fanatically loyal and
unwaveringly fierce. It’s a backhanded compliment that after the
battle of Hattin in 1187—the great defeat of the Franks at the hands
of Saladin, who was usually magnanimous—he insisted the Templar
prisoners be executed because they were seen as such a dire
threat.
Source
On the other side, Usama Ibn Munqidh tells the story of a Frank,
recently arrived to the Holy Land, who harassed him about how he
was praying when he was in a Templar chapel. And the Templars
apologized and helped Usama. Hosting him to pray was part of a
diplomatic code.

The Muslim-Christian relationship in the Middle Ages was highly


destructive. Both sides wanted to vanquish each other on the basis
of religious differences.

Christians and Muslims fought a number of wars, betrayed each


other, broke the agreements and they slaughtered millions of
people. The major reasons for the quarrel included the disputes over
the Holy Land, Jerusalem, and Constantinople.

When Christian Crusaders captured Jerusalem they killed all the


Muslims in the city. Throughout the Middle Ages, Christians also
made attempts to convert Muslims into Christians with gifts, gold
and other valuables but It is strange to say after collecting all the
gifts those converts were soon found again in mosques worshipping
and reading Quran.

Muslims often treated Christians better by giving them rights. In


1229 when the Muslims were again victorious in the holy land of
Jerusalem, they didn’t harm any Christian citizens. They allowed
them to follow their religion, but they have to pay higher taxes
(Jaziya) than Muslims.

You might also like