Module 6
Module 6
In the introduction video to this course, you learned that you will record project
details and create project documents as you observe Peta, Sauce & Spoon’s new
project manager, planning and executing project deliverables for the pilot tablet
rollout. By the end of this course, you’ll have developed a portfolio of project
management documents that will demonstrate your ability to manage stakeholders
and teams, organize plans, and communicate project details.
Throughout the activities in this course, you will be building and creating project
management documents, commonly referred to as artifacts, to apply what you
have learned. Many of these artifacts may be applicable to projects in your current
line of work or helpful in showcasing your skills when applying for a new project
management role.
As you work your way through the project life cycle, you will have to maintain good
relationships with all of your stakeholders to ensure they are satisfied and
contributing to the team. The following strategies can help you get to know your
stakeholders’ interests, concerns, and communication preferences and enlist their
help throughout your project’s life cycle:
Find out what stakeholders care about and why. Ask your
stakeholders: What are your most important priorities and goals? What role
would you like to play in this project? How will this project support you and your
most important priorities?
Adjust your communication frequency and approach based on
stakeholder roles and preferences. Tell your stakeholders: Here’s how
I plan to keep you informed—does that work for you?
Enlist the help of senior stakeholders when necessary. Ask your
stakeholders: Who else do you recommend I reach out to regarding this
project?
Once stakeholders have a vested interest, bring project
problems to them. Ask your stakeholders: How would you handle this
situation? What solutions come to mind?
Key takeaway
When writing descriptions of project tasks, keep them to one or two sentences long.
If you find that a certain task description needs to be longer than one or two
sentences, this indicates that the task is complex and could be broken down into
smaller tasks or that it may need further clarification.
Look at project task dependencies
When looking at how you might break certain parts of the project down into tasks,
consider task dependencies, or what has to be completed or handed off from one
person to another before work on each task can begin. Identifying dependencies can
help you decide how much a task needs to be broken down. For instance, if you are
managing a project that includes an awards ceremony and one of the tasks is to set
up the stage, the dependencies for this task could include getting estimates from an
audiovisual (AV) contractor, procuring necessary equipment, and constructing the
stage backdrop.
It is often helpful for your team to be involved in the task breakdown process. You
might have a meeting where you discuss each broad goal or major task with the
team. This way, team members can present varying perspectives as they work
together to break down tasks. For example, if someone on your team has had
experience on a similar project, they may suggest a certain task actually be broken
down into three different tasks.
Define project tasks by the amount of time they will take to complete
Defining project tasks by the amount of time they’re expected to take will reveal any
especially lengthy tasks. If a task is expected to take a long time, it could indicate
that there are additional subtasks that need to be defined. Identifying tasks by time is
helpful for scheduling other tasks or events around the longer tasks. This strategy
also helps you determine appropriate milestones, as milestones are often the
culmination of a series of tasks. Acknowledging the completion of a large and
lengthy task is also a great way to celebrate success, learn from the process, and
keep the project on track.
Identify project tasks by their “done” factors
Begin with the end in mind: What does it mean for the task to be considered “done”?
From there, you can work backwards to see if you’ve missed any steps and identify
checkpoints for completion along the way.
The three-point estimating technique can be used to help determine the most
realistic time estimate for a task. It uses optimistic, pessimistic, and most
likely calculations, meaning calculations are based on the “best case” (optimistic),
“worst case” (pessimistic), and most probable scenarios.
Three-point estimation
In this technique, each task receives three estimates: optimistic, most likely, and
pessimistic. Each of these three estimates is then associated with the corresponding
amount of time that task is expected to take.
Optimistic Assumes the best case scenario that issues will not occur Most Likely Assumes some
issues might occur and based on how long the task usually takes under normal circumstances
Pessimistic Assumes the worst case scenario that issues will definitely occur
For each task, add a duration estimate in each category: optimistic, most likely, and
pessimistic. You can get these estimates by doing research on the task or by asking
a task expert. As a best practice, add notes about the conditions that determine each
estimate.
Optimistic = Vendor is well-qualified, has all the materials, and shows up on time; Staff shows up in
time and successfully completes training within scheduled amount of time; All equipment works. 4
Hours Most Likely = Vendor is qualified but might not have all the materials; Vendor is new and
needs extra time to prepare; Extra training time has to be scheduled for absentee staff; Minor
glitches with equipment; Training has to be rescheduled. 6 Hours Pessimistic = Original vendor quits;
New vendor has to be hired; Staff no-shows or turnover right before the training; Equipment isn’t
delivered on time or doesn’t work; Training can’t happen until new equipment arrives. 6 Days
To determine your final estimate—the estimate you’re going to use in your project
plan—examine the optimistic and pessimistic timing, then compare it with the most
likely timing. Consider the conditions that are likely to exist while the task is being
completed. Does it seem reasonable that the most likely time can be met? If your
team has never completed this task before, or if dependencies for the task are
unknown, then the final estimate should be closer to the pessimistic estimate. If your
team is familiar with the task and you’re able to confirm the conditions for an
optimistic estimate, then the final estimate can be closer to the optimistic estimate.
Alternatively, simply use the most likely estimate, especially if the difference between
the optimistic and pessimistic estimates is minimal (a few hours or no more than one
or two days). A good practice is to build in a “buffer” that accounts for risks that are
likely but still keeps the project progressing at an efficient rate.
Three-point estimation formulas
Some projects will require you to calculate specific numeric values for task time
estimates. There are many online resources that provide more instruction for how to
calculate estimates, but we’ve provided two popular formulas: the Triangular
Distribution and the Beta (PERT) Distribution.
For each formula: E is Estimate (the final estimate you’ll assign to the task), o =
optimistic estimate, p = pessimistic estimate, and m = most likely estimate.
The weight of each estimate in this equation is identical, which means the most likely
case does not affect the final estimate more than the optimistic or pessimistic
estimates.
The Beta (PERT) distribution is a weighted average. The most likely estimate
receives a multiplier of four, while the overall divisor is increased to six.
This method takes into account that the most likely case is more likely to occur, so
it’s given more weight. The added weight is reflected in the multiplier of four.
Placing more weight on the most likely estimate increases the accuracy of the
estimate. In most cases, the Beta (PERT) Distribution has been proven to be more
accurate than three-point estimating and is often used to calculate both cost and
time estimates.
Introduction
Here is where you will state the purpose of the evaluation. Remember, in the context
of project quality management, the purpose of evaluation is to measure how well
your project is meeting the established quality standards. Presenting evaluation
findings to your stakeholders shows them how well the project is meeting quality
standards and informs them of the project’s success. To do this:
State the goal, milestone, or deliverable that is being evaluated and the quality
standards that were defined for that aspect of the project.
Include the evaluation questions and indicators that were used to evaluate each
quality standard.
Pro tip: Remember, your stakeholders have limited time. When preparing your
presentation, only select the most important standards and questions.
Evaluation findings
Now it’s time to state your findings. Give each standard its own section within this
portion of the presentation, and summarize what the findings mean for each
standard. Make a clear judgement about the findings: What did you learn? What can
you take away from the data? Tell the story of what the data means for the future of
the project and for the stakeholders.
Example: "The data reveals that 36% of users felt their dining experience was
negatively impacted by the tablets." It’s up to you to synthesize that data and
determine why that might be. Maybe it’s because the tablet software wasn’t
installed properly, resulting in glitchy technology. Or maybe it’s because the staff
wasn’t trained effectively, and therefore the ordering process was seriously
delayed. Maybe some customers just don’t want tablets taking their orders, and
they prefer to deal with wait staff. Explain what the data means in a way that
allows stakeholders to make decisions or declare this aspect of the project
successful or not.
Pro tip: Visualize the data with graphs or charts to quickly convey the message of
the findings.
Additional tips