0% found this document useful (0 votes)
6 views

Assignment2 software engineering

Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
6 views

Assignment2 software engineering

Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 3

Sub.

Re-Sub

Assignment Brief Submission&Resub


LOs LO2,LO3
Grade “ Sub”
Not Achieved
Grade “Resub” P
” repeat unit”

Student Name: ID Number


Unit Number and
ICT D - 326 Software Engineering
Title:
Qualification High National Bachelor in ICT
Academic Year: 2022/2023 Assessor Name Dr. Rasha Elstohy
Software engineering
Assignment Title Internal Verifier Name Dr.Eman mounir
Models
Assignment No. 2 Issue Date 15/5/2023
Submission Format
Report Submission Date 25/5/2023
Type of Evidence

STUDENT DECLARATION
Plagiarism
Plagiarism is a particular form of cheating. Plagiarism must be avoided at all costs and students who break the
rules, however innocently, may be penalised. It is your responsibility to ensure that you understand correct
referencing practices. As a university level student, you are expected to use appropriate references throughout
and keep carefully detailed notes of all your sources of materials for material you have used in your work,
including any material downloaded from the Internet. Please consult the relevant unit lecturer or your course
tutor if you need any further advice.
Student Declaration
Student declaration
I certify that the assignment submission is entirely my own work and I fully understand the consequences of
plagiarism. I understand that making a false declaration is a form of malpractice.

Also, I acknowledge that I have received the feedback about my work from the assessor.

Student signature: Date: / /2023

FORMATIVE FEEDBACK

Assessor’s Formative Feedback: Confirm action completed:

Rasha Elstohy

Assessor Signature: Date: 15/5/2023


IV assessment brief approval
IV’s signature:

Date: 15 / 5 /2022

1
Learning Outcomes and Assessment Criteria:
Learning Outcome Pass Merit Distinction

LO2 Define software requirements using object-


oriented analysis techniques.
P3 Explain requirements engineering process M2 specify
P4 Classify objects and group them into classes, requirements using
object interaction, object behavior, specify object common models (use
internals (attributes) cases, object models

LO3 Design system Object-oriented modeling (OOM)


M3 Analyse the D2 Test different
P5 Use an object-oriented modeling language to effectivenessof the cases using Case
model solutions dynamic behaviors (business model used in tools and coding
processes, use cases, sequence, activity, statechart providing a solution
diagrams), static structures (classes, class diagrams, for a given business
attributes, operations, visibility, association, context.
aggregation, inheritance, relationships between classes
components)
P6 Design a fully functional system to meet user
and system requirements for the business-related
problem.

Task1: As a software engineer, according to business case you have been delivered
a. Explain and Classify requirements according to user and system requirements,
functional and unfunctional requirements, Group your model to set of objects classes,
inputs , process and outputs.
b. Specify requirements using common models like use cases
Task2: According to your business case:
a. Use appropriate UML diagram to represent your system, Design them to show
component association.
b. Analyse the effectiveness of the selected model in providing a solution for a given
business context.
c. Test your UML diagram on any of popular case tools to generate efficient running
code
Note: Sources of information that you can use in answering the task are:

• Lecture Note.
• Unit Reference
• Lab Equipment
• Datasheets
• Any other useful trusted web page accepted by your assessor.

2
Higher Nationals - Summative Assignment
Feedback Form
Student Name Student ID

Unit Title Software engineering Models

Assignment Number (1 of 2) 2 Assignment Title


High National Bachelor in ICT

Assessor Summative Feedback: Feedback should be against the learning outcomes and assessment
criteria to help students understand how these inform the process of judging the overall grade. *Should be
constructive and useful including:
- Feedback should give full guidance to the students on how they have met the learning outcomes and
assessment criteria

a) Strengths of performance

b) Limitations of performance

c) Any improvements needed in future assessments

Assessor Signature: Dr. Rasha Elstohy Date: 15 / 5 / 2023

. Actual Date Received


Re-submission Date / /2023 / 5 /2023
Re-submission
Resubmission Feedback:
*Please note resubmission feedback is focussed only on the resubmitted work

Assessor Signature: Date: / /2023

Internal Verifier’s Comments:

Signature: Date: / /2023

* Please note that grade decisions are provisional. They are only confirmed once internal and external
moderation has taken place and grades decisions have
Summative been agreed
Assignment at the
Feedback assessment board.
Form

You might also like