Quantum Magnetism Spin Waves and Optical Cavities Silvia Viola Kusminskiy 2024 Scribd Download
Quantum Magnetism Spin Waves and Optical Cavities Silvia Viola Kusminskiy 2024 Scribd Download
Quantum Magnetism Spin Waves and Optical Cavities Silvia Viola Kusminskiy 2024 Scribd Download
com
https://textbookfull.com/product/quantum-
magnetism-spin-waves-and-optical-cavities-silvia-
viola-kusminskiy/
https://textbookfull.com/product/lgbtq-activism-in-central-and-
eastern-europe-radzhana-buyantueva/
textbookfull.com
Feminist Fight Club An Office Survival Manual For a Sexist
Workplace Bennett
https://textbookfull.com/product/feminist-fight-club-an-office-
survival-manual-for-a-sexist-workplace-bennett/
textbookfull.com
https://textbookfull.com/product/strip-for-me-naked-heat-1-1st-
edition-georgia-coffman/
textbookfull.com
https://textbookfull.com/product/felt-time-the-psychology-of-how-we-
perceive-time-1st-edition-marc-wittmann/
textbookfull.com
https://textbookfull.com/product/bioelectromagnetics-human-safety-and-
biomedical-applications-2nd-edition-riadh-habash-author/
textbookfull.com
https://textbookfull.com/product/pathways-to-public-relations-
histories-of-practice-and-profession-1st-edition-burton-st-john-iii/
textbookfull.com
Environmental Geography of South Asia Contributions Toward
a Future Earth Initiative 1st Edition R.B. Singh
https://textbookfull.com/product/environmental-geography-of-south-
asia-contributions-toward-a-future-earth-initiative-1st-edition-r-b-
singh/
textbookfull.com
SPRINGER BRIEFS IN PHYSICS
Quantum
Magnetism,
Spin Waves, and
Optical Cavities
SpringerBriefs in Physics
Series editors
B. Ananthanarayan, Centre for High Energy Physics, Indian Institute of Science,
Bangalore, India
Egor Babaev, Amherst, MA, USA
Malcolm Bremer, Bristol, UK
Xavier Calmet, Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Sussex,
Brighton, UK
Francesca Di Lodovico, London, UK
Pablo D. Esquinazi, Institute for Experimental Physics II, University of Leipzig,
Leipzig, Germany
Maarten Hoogerland, Auckland, New Zealand
Eric Le Ru, School of Chemical and Physical Sciences, Victoria University of
Wellington, Kelburn, Wellington, New Zealand
Hans-Joachim Lewerenz, Pasadena, CA, USA
James Overduin, Towson, MD, USA
Vesselin Petkov, Montreal, QC, Canada
Charles H.-T. Wang, Department of Physics, The University of Aberdeen,
Aberdeen, UK
Andrew Whitaker, Belfast, UK
Stefan Theisen, Max-Planck-Institut für Gravitationsphys, Potsdam, Germany
Dario Narducci, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
SpringerBriefs in Physics are a series of slim high-quality publications encom-
passing the entire spectrum of physics. Manuscripts for SpringerBriefs in Physics
will be evaluated by Springer and by members of the Editorial Board. Proposals and
other communication should be sent to your Publishing Editors at Springer.
Featuring compact volumes of 50 to 125 pages (approximately 20,000–45,000
words), Briefs are shorter than a conventional book but longer than a journal article.
Thus Briefs serve as timely, concise tools for students, researchers, and professionals.
Typical texts for publication might include:
• A snapshot review of the current state of a hot or emerging field
• A concise introduction to core concepts that students must understand in order
to make independent contributions
• An extended research report giving more details and discussion than is possible
in a conventional journal article
• A manual describing underlying principles and best practices for an experi-
mental technique
• An essay exploring new ideas within physics, related philosophical issues, or
broader topics such as science and society
Briefs are characterized by fast, global electronic dissemination, straightforward
publishing agreements, easy-to-use manuscript preparation and formatting guide-
lines, and expedited production schedules. We aim for publication 8–12 weeks after
acceptance.
123
Silvia Viola Kusminskiy
Max-Planck-Institute for the Science
of Light
Erlangen, Bayern, Germany
This Springer imprint is published by the registered company Springer Nature Switzerland AG
The registered company address is: Gewerbestrasse 11, 6330 Cham, Switzerland
Contents
1 Electromagnetism . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
1.1 Basic Magnetostatics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
1.2 Magnetic Moment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
1.3 Orbital Angular Momentum . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
1.4 Spin Angular Momentum . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
1.5 Magnetic Moment in a Magnetic Field . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
1.6 Magnetization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
1.7 Magnetostatic Maxwell Equations in Matter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
1.8 Demagnetizing Fields . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
2 Atomic Origins of Magnetism . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
2.1 Basics of Quantum Mechanics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
2.2 Orbital Angular Momentum in Quantum Mechanics . . . . . . . . . . . 18
2.3 Hydrogen Atom . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
2.4 Addition of Angular Momentum and Magnetic Moment . . . . . . . . 21
2.5 Generalization to Many Electrons . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23
3 Magnetism in Solids . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25
3.1 The Curie–Weiss Law . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26
3.2 Exchange Interaction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29
3.3 Hydrogen Molecule . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31
3.4 Heisenberg, Ising, and XY Models . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34
3.5 Mean Field Theory . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36
3.6 Ground State of the Ferromagnetic Heisenberg Hamiltonian . . . . . 38
3.7 Ground State of the Antiferromagnetic Heisenberg
Hamiltonian . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..... 41
3.8 Ground State of the Classical Heisenberg Model . . . . . . . . ..... 42
3.9 Dipole–Dipole Interactions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ..... 44
v
vi Contents
Both magnetic materials and light have always played a predominant role in
information technologies, and continue to do so as we move into the realm of
quantum technologies. In this course, we review the basics of magnetism and
quantum mechanics, before going into more advanced subjects. Magnetism is
intrinsically quantum mechanical in nature, and magnetic ordering can only be
explained by the use of quantum theory. We will go over the interactions and the
resulting Hamiltonian that governs magnetic phenomena, and discuss its elementary
excitations, denominated magnons. After that we will study magneto-optical effects
and derive the classical Faraday effect. We will then move on to the quantization
of the electric field and the basics of optical cavities. This will allow us to
understand a topic of current research denominated Cavity Optomagnonics.
This book is based on the notes written for the course I taught in the Summer
Semester 2018 at the Friedrich-Alexander Universität in Erlangen. It is intended for
Master or advanced Bachelor students. Basic knowledge of quantum mechanics,
electromagnetism, and solid state at the bachelor level is assumed. Each section is
followed by a couple of simple exercises which should serve as to “fill in the
blanks” of what has been derived and a couple of checkpoints for the main concepts
developed.
vii
Chapter 1
Electromagnetism
The history of magnetism is ancient: just to give an example, the magnetic com-
pass was invented in China more than 2000 years ago. The fact that magnetism is
intrinsically connected to moving electric charges (and not to “magnetic charges”),
however, was not discovered until much later. In the year 1820, Oersted experimen-
tally demonstrated that a current-carrying wire had an effect on the orientation of a
magnetic compass needle placed in its proximity. In the following few years, Ampere
realized that a small current loop generates a magnetic field which is equivalent to
that of a small magnet, and speculated that all magnetic fields are caused by charges
in motion. In the next few sections, we will review these concepts and the basics of
magnetostatics.
As the name indicates, magnetostatics deals with magnetic fields that are constant in
time. The condition for that is a steady-state current, in which both the charge density
ρ and the current density j = I /As (As cross-sectional area) are independent of time
∂ρ
=0 (1.1.1)
∂t
∂j
= 0. (1.1.2)
∂t
From the continuity equation
∂ρ
∇ ·j+ = 0, (1.1.3)
∂t
ds
r B
r
d
I
Fig. 1.1 The magnetic induction generated by a current I can be calculated using Biot–Savart’s
law, see Eq. 1.1.6. Ampere’s law (see Eq. 1.1.7) is always valid, but useful to calculate the B fields
only for cases of particular symmetry, e.g., an infinite straight wire
we moreover obtain
∇ ·j = 0. (1.1.4)
In these notes, we will call magnetic induction to B and magnetic field to H.1 In
free space, these two fields are related by
B = μ0 H (1.1.5)
being μ0 = 4π × 10−7 NA−2 the permeability of free space. We will use the SI units
system throughout these notes, and therefore B is measured in Teslas (T = V.s.m−2 )
and H in Amperes per meter (A.m−1 ).
The magnetic induction at point r due to a current loop can be calculated using
the Biot–Savart law
μ0 I r
dB = 2
d × , (1.1.6)
4πr r
where d points in the direction of the current I , see Fig. 1.1. Equivalent to the
Biot–Savart law is Ampere’s law, which reads
B · ds = μ0 I, (1.1.7)
C
where I is the current enclosed by the closed loop C, see Fig. 1.1. Ampere’s law is
general, but it is useful to calculate magnetic fields only in cases of high symmetry,
for example, the magnetic field generated by an infinite straight wire. Using Stoke’s
theorem, we can put Ampere’s law in differential form
∇ × B = μ0 j . (1.1.8)
1 Some authors call instead B the magnetic field and H the auxiliary field.
Visit https://textbookfull.com
now to explore a rich
collection of eBooks, textbook
and enjoy exciting offers!
1.1 Basic Magnetostatics 3
∇ ·B=0 (1.1.9)
constitute the Maxwell equations for magnetostatics. These equations give us indeed
time-independent magnetic fields, and if we compare the magnetostatic equations
with the full microscopic Maxwell equations
∇ ·B = 0 (1.1.10)
ρ
∇ ·E = (1.1.11)
ε0
∂B
∇ ×E = − (1.1.12)
∂t
∂E
∇ × B = μ0 j + ε0 (1.1.13)
∂t
(with ε0 = 8.85 × 10−12 Fm−1 the vacuum permittivity) we see that we have, more-
over, decoupled the magnetic and electric fields.
Check Points
• What is the magnetostatic condition?
• Write the magnetostatic Maxwell equations.
m = I An̂ , (1.2.1)
where A is the area enclosed by the loop and n̂ is the normal to the surface, with its
direction defined from the circulating current by the right-hand rule, see Fig. 1.2. m
defines a magnetic dipole in the limit of A → 0 but finite moment.
Using Eq. 1.1.6, we can calculate the magnetic induction generated by a small
current loop of radius R
μ0 I d × r
B(r) = (1.2.2)
4π r 3
μ0 I 1
=− d × ∇
4π r
with r = r − r (see Fig. 1.3). From Eq. 1.1.9, we know we can define a vector
potential A(r) such that B(r) = ∇ × A(r). By a simple manipulation of Eq. 1.2.2,
one can show that in the far-field limit (r R),
4 1 Electromagnetism
n̂
A
Fig. 1.2 Magnetic dipole: the magnetic field induced by a small current loop is equivalent to that
of a small magnet
μ0 r̂
A(r) = m× 2 (1.2.3)
4π r
μ0 3(m · r)r − r 2 m
B(r) = , (1.2.4)
4π r5
which is the magnetic induction generated by a magnetic dipole. More generally, for
an arbitrary current density distribution j(r ), one can define [1, 2]
1
m= d3 r r × j(r ) (1.2.5)
2
and Eq. 1.2.3 is the lowest nonvanishing term in a multipole expansion of the vector
potential (in the Coulomb gauge, ∇ · A = 0)
μ0 j(r )
A(r) = d3 r . (1.2.6)
4π |r − r |
1.2 Magnetic Moment 5
E Z = −m · B (1.2.7)
L = me R2ω
(1.3.2)
Therefore, we have linked the magnetic moment of a moving charge to its orbital
angular momentum. The coefficient of proportionality is called the gyromagnetic
ratio e
γL = − , (1.3.4)
2m e
which is negative due to the negative charge of the electron. Hence, in this case
the magnetic moment and angular momentum are antiparallel. In solids, electrons
are the primary source of magnetism due to their small mass compared to that of
6 1 Electromagnetism
r
R
+
the nucleus. Since m p ≈ 103 m e , the gyromagnetic ratio for the nucleus is strongly
suppressed with respect to the electronic one.
Check Points
• What is the gyromagnetic ratio?
• Why is the gyromagnetic ratio of the nucleus suppressed with respect to the elec-
tronic one?
Although we performed a classical calculation, the result obtained for the gyromag-
netic ratio in Eq. 1.3.4 is consistent with the quantum mechanical result. We know,
however, that the electron posses an intrinsic angular momentum, that is, the spin S.
The total angular momentum of the electron is therefore given by
J = L + S. (1.4.1)
The spin has no classical analog and the coefficient of proportionality γS between
magnetic moment and spin
mS = γS S (1.4.2)
needs to be calculated quantum mechanically via the Dirac equation (see, e.g., Chap. 2
of Ref. [3]). The result is
e
γS ≈ − = 2γL , (1.4.3)
m
where the approximate symbol indicates that there are relativistic corrections (also
contained in the Dirac equation!) to this expression. The γS value agrees with exper-
imental observations.
1.4 Spin Angular Momentum 7
mL τ
and hence is not simply proportional to the total angular momentum! To understand
the relation between mTOT and J, given by the Landé factor, we need to resort to
quantum mechanics and the operator representation of angular momentum. We will
do that in the next chapter, where we discuss the atomic origins of magnetism.
Check Points
• What is the relation between the magnetic moment of an electron and the angular
momentum operators?
T = m × B. (1.5.1)
Therefore, the classical equation of motion for the magnetic dipole (considering for
the moment only the orbital angular momentum) is
dL
= m × B = γL L × B . (1.5.2)
dt
Using the geometry depicted in Fig. 1.6, we obtain
8 1 Electromagnetism
êz
which is denominated the Larmor frequency. Therefore, the angular momentum will
precess around the B field at a fixed angle θ and with constant angular frequency ωL .
This is consistent with the energy expression defined in Eq. 1.2.7. The work per
unit time performed by the torque is given by the usual expression for the power
dW
= T · ω,
(1.5.6)
dt
where the angular velocity vector is perpendicular to the plane of rotation and its
direction is given by the right-hand rule. We see therefore that there is no power
transfer in the Larmor precession, since ωL êz · T = 0. There is, however, an energy
cost if we want to change the angle θ of precession, since the resultant angular
velocity θ̇eϕ is collinear with the torque. Using (for simplicity we defined now θ as
the angle between m and B, see Fig. 1.7)
T = −m B sin θeϕ
ω
θ = −θ̇eϕ , (1.5.7)
we find
dθ
T θ̇ = −m B sin θ (1.5.8)
dt
1.5 Magnetic Moment in a Magnetic Field 9
êz θ
mL êθ
τ = mL × B
We can therefore take the Zeeman energy E Z as the potential energy associated with
the necessary work required to rotate the dipole m with respect to an external B field.
We will see equations of motion in the form of Eq. 1.5.2 reappearing throughout
this course, even as we treat the angular momenta as quantum operators. The reason
is that, even though the total magnetic moment mTOT is not proportional to the total
angular momentum J (see Eq. 1.4.4), their quantum mechanical expectation values
are proportional to each other through the Landé factor g. We will see this more
formally when we start dealing with the quantum mechanical representation of the
angular momenta. For now, we assume that mTOT and J are related by
from which we can obtain a classical expression for g, by replacing Eqs. 1.4.4 and
1.4.1 into 1.5.10 and noting that
1 2
L·S= J − L 2 − S2
2
3 S2 − L 2
gcl = + , (1.5.11)
2 2J 2
where the superscript indicates this is a classical approximation for g, which coincides
with the quantum mechanical result in the limit J 2 , S 2 , and L 2 large [4].
10 1 Electromagnetism
Check Points
• Write the equation of motion for an angular momentum in the presence of a
magnetic field.
• What is the dynamics of an angular momentum in the presence of a magnetic field?
• What is the Larmor frequency?
1.6 Magnetization
Inside a material, the magnetic induction B indicates the response of the material to
the applied magnetic field H. Both vector fields are related through the magnetization
in the sample
B = μ0 (H + M) , (1.6.1)
where the magnetization is defined as the average magnetic moment per unit volume,
mV
M(r) = , (1.6.2)
V
and where the average indicates that we average over all atomic magnetic moments
in a small volume V around position r.2 In this way, a smooth vectorial function
of position is obtained. From Eq. 1.6.1, we see that the magnetization has the same
units as the magnetic field H (A.m−1 ). In Eq. 1.6.1, both B and H indicate the fields
inside the material, and hence H contains also the demagnetizing fields (that is, it is
not just the external applied field). We will see more on demagnetization fields in
the next section.
The response to the magnetic field of the magnetization and field induction are
characterized by the magnetic susceptibility χ and the permeability μ, respectively
M = χH (1.6.3)
B = μH , (1.6.4)
where we have written the simplest expressions for the case in which all fields
are collinear, static (that is, independent of time), and homogeneous in space (q =
ω = 0). In general, however, the response functions are tensorial quantities, e.g.,
Mi = j χi j H j , and depend on frequency ω and momentum q. Note that from
Eq. 1.6.1, we obtain
μ
μr = =1+χ (1.6.5)
μ0
The quantities defined in Eqs. 1.6.3 and 1.6.4 are still allowed to depend on tem-
perature T and magnetic field H. We will now consider qualitatively the dependence
on H. For linear materials, χ and μ are independent of H. A linear material with nega-
tive constant susceptibility is diamagnetic, whereas a positive susceptibility indicates
either paramagnetism (no magnetic order) or antiferromagnetism (magnetic order
with magnetic moments anti-aligned and zero total magnetization). In these cases,
the magnetization is finite only in the presence of a magnetic field. On the other hand,
if χ and μ depend on H, the relations Eqs. 1.6.3 and 1.6.4 are nonlinear. This is the
case for magnetically ordered states with net magnetization, namely, ferromagnets
(magnetic moments aligned and pointing in the same direction) and ferrimagnets
(magnetic moments anti-aligned but of different magnitudes, so that there is a net
magnetization). In these materials, the magnetization increases nonlinearly with the
applied field and saturates when all the magnetic moments are aligned. When decreas-
ing the magnetic field, there is a remanent, finite magnetization at zero field. This
process is called hysteresis and it is used to magnetize materials. As we learned in the
previous section, the magnetic moment, and hence the magnetic characteristics of a
material, are related to the total angular momentum of the electrons, and therefore
on the atomic structure. We will learn more about this in the next chapter.
Check Points
• What is the relation between magnetic moment and magnetization?
To calculate the magnetic dipole moment m from Eq. 1.2.5, we have to know the
microscopic current density. In general, however, we are not interested in micro-
scopic, fast fluctuations. We already saw an example in which we considered the
average current I generated by one orbiting electron, to obtain semiclassically the
gyromagnetic ratio γL in Sec.1.3. We have also defined the magnetization M as a
macroscopic quantity which entails the average density of the microscopic m. In a
material, in general, we have access to the magnetization, which is due to bound
microscopic currents, and to the macroscopic current density due to free charges,
which we will denominate jF . This motivates defining a macroscopic vector poten-
tial A in terms of these two macroscopic quantities, and not the microscopic currents
as in Eq. 1.2.6
μ0 jF (r ) M(r ) × (r − r )
A(r) = d3 r
+ . (1.7.1)
4π |r − r | |r − r |3
Note that this is simply rewriting Eq. 1.2.6, separating the bound- and free-current
contributions. The bound-current contribution, the second term in Eq. 1.7.1, is written
in terms of the magnetization and is equivalent to an averaged Eq. 1.2.3.
12 1 Electromagnetism
Equation 1.7.1 allows us to define an effective current density associated with the
magnetization, by noting that [1]
3 M(r) × (r − r ) 3 1
d r = d r M(r ) × ∇ (1.7.2)
V |r − r |3 V |r − r |
1 M(r ) × da
= d3 r ∇ × M(r ) + .
V |r − r | S |r − r |
jB = ∇ × M (1.7.3)
KB = M × n̂, (1.7.4)
where the surface element is defined as da = dan̂. In the bulk, for a well-behaved
magnetization function, the surface integral vanishes and we obtain
μ0 jF (r ) jB (r )
A(r) = d3 r + . (1.7.5)
4π |r − r | |r − r |
∇ × B = μ0 (jF + ∇ × M) (1.7.6)
1
H= B−M (1.7.7)
μ0
such that
∇ × H = jF . (1.7.8)
Therefore, the magnetic field H takes into account in an average way the bound
currents, and has as its only source the free currents. Equation 1.7.8 is equivalent to
Eq. 1.1.8, just rewritten in a more convenient form for macroscopic magnetostatics
in matter. Note that H is, on the contrary to B, not divergence-free:
∇ · H = −∇ · M . (1.7.9)
∇ ·B=0
∇ × H = jF (1.7.10)
(B2 − B1 ) · n̂ = 0 (1.7.11)
n̂ × (H2 − H1 ) = KF , (1.7.12)
Check Points
• What is the meaning of the magnetic field H?
• What are the magnetostatic Maxwell equations in matter?
A crucial difference between magnetic and electric fields is the lack of free mag-
netic charges or monopoles.3 They are, however, a useful mathematical construction
in some cases, for example, to calculate the so-called demagnetization fields. In
finite systems, we can consider the magnetization as dropping to zero abruptly at the
boundary of the material, giving rise to an accumulated “magnetic charge density”
at the surface which acts as an extra source of magnetic fields inside of the material.
These fields in general oppose to an externally applied magnetic field and are there-
fore dubbed demagnetizing fields. A surface magnetic charge density is energetically
costly, and for finite magnetic systems at the microscale, it can determine the spa-
tial dependence of the magnetically ordered ground state, giving rise to magnetic
textures.
If we consider the special case of no free currents, jF = 0, Eqs. 1.7.10 imply that
we can define a magnetic scalar potential φM such that
H = −∇φM (1.8.1)
3 Magnetic monopoles, if they exist, have evaded experimental detection so far. They can, however,
emerge as effective quasiparticles in condensed matter systems, and have been detected in materials
which behave magnetically as a “spin ice” [5–7].
14 1 Electromagnetism
êθ
∇ 2 φM = −∇ · M (1.8.2)
with solution
1 3 ∇ · M(r ) 1 n̂ · M(r )
φM (r) = − d r
+ da . (1.8.3)
4π V |r − r | 4π S |r − r |
Analogous to the case of the vector potential in Eq. 1.7.2, this allows us to define an
effective magnetic charge density
ρM = −∇ · M (1.8.4)
σM = M · n̂ . (1.8.5)
We see that ρM can only be finite for a nonhomogeneous magnetization M(r), whereas
a finite σM indicates a discontinuity of M at the chosen surface S.
1. Exercise: Uniformly magnetized sphere
For a ferromagnet at saturation, the magnetization can be considered as given, so
we can in principle calculate the resulting magnetic field for a given geometry using
Eq. 1.8.3. We consider here as an example the case of a uniformly magnetized sphere
as depicted in Fig. 1.8.
(a) Choosing êz in the direction of M, we can write M = M0 êz . Calculate ρM and
σM and write the Poisson equation for φM .
1.8 Demagnetizing Fields 15
1
M =
φin M0 z (1.8.6)
3
and find the magnetic field Hin and magnetic induction Bin inside of the sphere.
(c) The magnetic field Hin inside of the sphere opposes the magnetization and it is
therefore called a demagnetizing field. The proportionality coefficient between
Hin and M is called the demagnetizing factor N . What is the value of N in this
case? Demagnetization factors are geometry dependent and can moreover be
defined only in very special cases with simple geometries.4 Besides the sphere,
one can define demagnetization factors for an infinite plane, an infinite cylinder,
and a spheroid.
(d) Let us assume that now the sphere is placed in an external magnetic field H0 .
Using linearity, write the solution for Hin and Bin in this case.
(e) Let us now consider the case that the sphere is not permanently magnetized, but
we now the material has a permeability μ. From the constitutive equation
Check Points
• Which is the origin of the demagnetization factors?
4 Thedemagnetizing fields are always present, but it is only in very simple geometries that one can
describe them with simple numerical factors.
Chapter 2
Atomic Origins of Magnetism
In the previous chapter, we reviewed the basic concepts of magnetism and mag-
netostatics using some semiclassical considerations. In particular, we attributed the
magnetic moment of atoms to “small current loops” and to the angular momentum
of electrons. In this chapter, we will put these concepts into more solid footing with
the help of quantum mechanics.
∂ψ(r, t) 2 2
i =− ∇ ψ(r, t) + V ψ(r, t) . (2.1.1)
∂t 2m
The probability of finding the particle at a time t in a volume element d3r around posi-
tion r is given by |ψ(r, t)|2 d3r . If the potential V is independent of time, ψ(r, t) =
ψ(r) f (t) and ψ(r) is an eigenfunction of the time-independent Schrödinger equation
2 2
− ∇ ψ(r) + V (r) ψ(r) = Eψ(r) (2.1.2)
2m
with energy E. Equivalently, we can write the eigenvalue equation for the Hamilto-
nian in Dirac notation
Ĥ |ψ = E|ψ, (2.1.3)
where the quantum state of the particle is represented by the ket |ψ, the respective
wavefunction is ψ(r) = r|ψ, and the Hamiltonian operator is
p̂ 2
Ĥ = + V (r̂). (2.1.4)
2m
1
AB ≥ [ Â, B̂] , (2.1.5)
2
where A = Â2 − Â2 corresponds to the standard variation of  and analo-
gously for operator B̂.
From this expression, it is easy to verify that the different components of L̂ do not
commute with each other. Instead, one obtains
[ L̂ i , Lˆ j ] = ii jk L̂ k , (2.2.2)
where i jk is the Levi-Civita tensor and the Einstein convention for the implicit
sum or repeated indices has been used. Therefore, it is not possible to measure
simultaneously with arbitrary precision all components of the angular momentum.
Random documents with unrelated
content Scribd suggests to you:
features, gave place to the calmest dignity. "If not mine," he said,
"let me yield the sway to the lady Peace: the name and presence of
a Plantagenet shall no longer sanction the devastation of his country.
I would rather be a cotter on your wild Highlands, than buy the
sovereignty of my fair England by the blood of her inhabitants."
The warm, though capricious heart of James, was quietly recalled
by the look and voice of his once dearest friend, to a sense of the
ungraciousness of his proceeding: he frankly stretched out his hand;
"I was wrong, cousin, forgive me, we will confer anon. Even now,
orders have been issued to recall the troops; a few words will
explain everything."
York bent his head in acquiescence. The king dismissed his
nobles, and committed to the care of one among them the reverend
D'Ayala. With a strong sentiment of self-defence, which was self-
accusation—a half return of his ancient affection, which acted like
remorse—James set himself to explain his proceedings. Fearful,
unaided by any of the natives, of proceeding with an inadequate
force farther into the heart of the country, he had set down before
the castle of Norham, which was defended undauntedly by the
bishop of Durham. He had wasted much time here; and now the
Cornish insurgents being quelled, the earl of Surrey was marching
northwards, at the head of forty thousand men. Surrey, Howard,
might he not be a masked friend? "who," continued James, "has
surely some personal enmity to your highness; for the reverend
Father D'Ayala, an ambassador from Spain, visited him on his
journey northward, and it seems the noble indulged in despiteful
language; saying, that he who could bring the fell Scot (I thank him)
into England, wore manifest signs of—I will not say—I remember not
his words; they are of no import. The sum is, my dear lord, I cannot
meet the English army in the open field; walled town—even those
paltry towers—I cannot win: with what shame and haste I may, I
must retreat over the border."
Many more words James, in the heat of repentant affection, said
to soothe his English friend. York's blood boiled in his veins; his mind
was a chaos of scorn, mortification, and worse anger against
himself. The insult inflicted by James before his assembled lords, the
bitter speech of Surrey; he almost feared that he deserved the one,
while he disdained to resent the other; and both held him silent. As
speedily as he might, he took leave of the king: he saw signs in the
encampment of the return of the foragers; they were laden with
booty: his heart was sick; to ease his pent-up burning spirit, when
night brought solitude, though not repose, he wrote thus to the Lady
Katherine:—
"Wilt thou, dear lady of my heart, descend from thy lofty state,
and accept an errant knight, instead of a sceptered king, for thy
mate? Alas! sweet Kate, if thou wilt not, I may never see thee more:
for not thus, oh not thus, my God, will Richard win a kingdom! Poor
England bleeds: our over-zealous cousin has pierced her with dismal
wounds; and thou wouldst in thy gentleness shed a thousand tears,
hadst thou beheld the misery that even now, grim and ghastly, floats
before my sight. What am I, that I should be the parent of evil
merely? Oh, my mother, my too kind friends, why did ye not conceal
me from myself? Teaching me lessons of humbleness, rearing me as
a peasant, consigning me to a cloister, my injuries would have died
with me; and the good, the brave, the innocent, who have perished
for me, or through me, had been spared!
"I fondly thought that mine was no vulgar ambition. I desired the
good of others; the raising up and prosperity of my country. I saw
my father's realm sold to a huckster—his subjects the victims of low-
souled avarice. What more apparent duty, than to redeem his crown
from Jew-hearted Tudor, and to set the bright jewels, pure and
sparkling as when they graced his brow, on the head of his only
son? Even now I think the day will come when I shall repair the
losses of this sad hour—is it the restless ambitious spirit of youth
that whispers future good, or true forebodings of the final triumph of
the right?
"Now, O sweetest Kate, I forget disgrace, I forget remorse; I bury
every sorrow in thought of thee. Thy idea is as a windless haven to
some way-worn vessel—its nest in a vast oak-tree to a tempest-
baffled bird—hope of Paradise to the martyr who expires in pain.
Wilt thou receive me with thine own dear smile? My divine love, I
am not worthy of thee; yet thou art mine—Lackland Richard's single
treasure. The stars play strange gambols with us—I am richer than
Tudor, and but that thy husband must leave no questioned name, I
would sign a bond with fate—let him take England, give me
Katherine. But a prince may not palter with the holy seal God affixes
to him—nor one espoused to thee be less than king; fear not,
therefore, that I waver though I pause—Adieu!"
CHAPTER XXXVI
FORD.
TREACHERY
I am your wife,
No human power can or shall divorce
My faith from duty.
FORD.
——With
My fortune and my seeming destiny,
He made the bond, and broke it not with me.
No human tie is snapp'd betwixt us two.
SCHILLER'S WALLENSTEIN.
CHAPTER XXXVIII
DEPRESSION
SHELLEY.
The hour had now arrived when Richard took leave of Scotland.
The king was humbled by the necessity he felt himself under, of
sending forth his friend and kinsman into the inhospitable world; and
he felt deep grief at parting with his lovely cousin. She grew pale,
when for the last time she saw the friend of her youth. But Katherine
looked upon life in a mode very different from the usual one: the
luxuries and dignities of the world never in her mind for a moment
came in competition with her affections and her duty; she saw the
plain path before her; whatever her father's or her royal cousin's
idea had been in giving her to the duke of York, she knew that,
being his, her destiny upon earth was to share his fortunes, and
soothe his sorrows. This constant looking on, giving herself up to,
and delighting in one aim, one object, one occupation, elevated her
far above the common cares of existence. She left
CHAPTER XXXIX
SIEGE OF WATERFORD
SHAKSPEARE.