Where can buy Site Analysis A Contextual Approach to Sustainable Land Planning and Site Design 2nd Edition James A. Lagro ebook with cheap price
Where can buy Site Analysis A Contextual Approach to Sustainable Land Planning and Site Design 2nd Edition James A. Lagro ebook with cheap price
Where can buy Site Analysis A Contextual Approach to Sustainable Land Planning and Site Design 2nd Edition James A. Lagro ebook with cheap price
https://ebookultra.com
https://ebookultra.com/download/site-analysis-a-
contextual-approach-to-sustainable-land-planning-
and-site-design-2nd-edition-james-a-lagro/
https://ebookultra.com/download/site-seeing-a-visual-approach-to-web-
usability-1st-edition-luke-wroblewski/
ebookultra.com
https://ebookultra.com/download/building-a-web-site-for-dummies-david-
a-crowder/
ebookultra.com
https://ebookultra.com/download/landscape-architecture-site-non-site-
architectural-design-03-04-2007-vol-77-n-2-1st-edition-michael-spens/
ebookultra.com
Hydrogeological Conceptual Site Models Data Analysis and
Visualization Neven Kresic
https://ebookultra.com/download/hydrogeological-conceptual-site-
models-data-analysis-and-visualization-neven-kresic/
ebookultra.com
https://ebookultra.com/download/field-hydrogeology-a-guide-for-site-
investigations-and-report-preparation-2nd-ed-edition-moore/
ebookultra.com
https://ebookultra.com/download/harney-flats-a-florida-paleoindian-
site-1st-edition-i-randolph-daniel/
ebookultra.com
https://ebookultra.com/download/a-social-justice-approach-to-survey-
design-and-analysis-1st-edition-llewellyn-j-cornelius/
ebookultra.com
Site Analysis A Contextual Approach to Sustainable Land
Planning and Site Design 2nd Edition James A. Lagro
Digital Instant Download
Author(s): James A. LaGro
ISBN(s): 9780471797982, 0471797987
Edition: 2
File Details: PDF, 16.63 MB
Year: 2007
Language: english
ii
Site Analysis
i
ii
Site Analysis
A Contextual Approach
to Sustainable Land Planning
and Site Design
Second Edition
iii
100%
Copyright # 2008 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved
Published by John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, New Jersey
Published simultaneously in Canada
Wiley Bicentennial Logo: Richard J. Pacifico.
No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in
any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, scanning, or
otherwise, except as permitted under Section 107 or 108 of the 1976 United States Copyright
Act, without either the prior written permission of the Publisher, or authorization through
payment of the appropriate per-copy fee to the Copyright Clearance Center, 222 Rosewood
Drive, Danvers, MA 01923, (978) 750-8400, fax (978) 646-8600, or on the web at
www.copyright.com. Requests to the Publisher for permission should be addressed to the
Permissions Department, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 111 River Street, Hoboken, NJ 07030,
(201) 748-6011, fax (201) 748-6008, or online at www.wiley.com/go/permissions.
Limit of Liability/Disclaimer of Warranty: While the publisher and the author have used their
best efforts in preparing this book, they make no representations or warranties with respect to
the accuracy or completeness of the contents of this book and specifically disclaim any implied
warranties of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose. No warranty may be created or
extended by sales representatives or written sales materials. The advice and strategies contained
herein may not be suitable for your situation. You should consult with a professional where
appropriate. Neither the publisher nor the author shall be liable for any loss of profit or any
other commercial damages, including but not limited to special, incidental, consequential, or
other damages.
For general information about our other products and services, please contact our Customer
Care Department within the United States at (800) 762-2974, outside the United States at
(317) 572-3993 or fax (317) 572-4002.
Wiley also publishes its books in a variety of electronic formats. Some content that appears in
print may not be available in electronic books. For more information about Wiley products,
visit our web site at www.wiley.com.
LaGro, James A.
Site analysis : a contextual approach to sustainable land planning and site design / James A.
LaGro, Jr.—2nd ed.
p. cm.
First ed. published 2001.
Includes bibliographical references and index.
ISBN 978-0-471-79798-2 (cloth)
1. Building sites—Planning. 2. Building sites—Environmental aspects.
3. Land use—Planning. 4. Land use—Environmental aspects. I. Title.
NA2540.5.L34 2008
720.28—dc22 2007010270
iv
Contents
Preface ix
Acknowledgments xii
v
vi Contents
CHAPTER 4 PROGRAMMING 77
Introduction 77
Programming Methods 79
Program Documentation 86
Conclusion 89
Appendix 329
Glossary 337
References 347
Index 357
Preface
CONTEXT
WHAT’S NEW
New content has been added to every chapter of this second edition. Substantial revisions
were made to Chapter 1 (Shaping the Built Environment), Chapter 2 (Visualization of
Spatial Information), Chapter 3 (Site Selection), Chapter 6 (Site Inventory: Biological
Attributes), Chapter 7 (Site Inventory: Cultural Attributes), Chapter 8 (Site Analysis:
Integration and Synthesis), Chapter 9 (Conceptual Design), Chapter 10 (Design Devel-
opment), and Chapter 11 (Project Implementation). Chapter 10 from the first edition was
divided and expanded to create Chapters 10 and 11 in the second edition. This revised
edition explores in more detail the linkages between site conditions and ecologically
sustainable development—and redevelopment—of the built environment. More attention
ix
x Preface
is also given to finer-scale site and building design issues and to the development regulations
and design review processes that influence the shaping of the built environment.
This book is divided into four parts. Part I, Process and Tools, contains Chapter 1 (Shaping
the Built Environment) and Chapter 2 (Visualization of Spatial Information). The first
chapter summarizes the site planning and design process and places site planning and design
in the broader context of sustainable planning and development. The second chapter
addresses the basic principles of mapping and graphic communication in site planning and
design.
Part II, Site Selection and Programming, also has two chapters. Chapter 3 (Site
Selection) examines the goals and methods of site suitability analysis leading to the com-
parison and selection of sites. Chapter 4 (Programming) focuses on programming methods
such as user surveys, focus groups, and market analyses.
Part III, Site Inventory and Analysis, is the core of the book. Chapter 5 (Site Inventory:
Physical Attributes) and Chapter 6 (Site Inventory: Biological Attributes) cover a wide
array of physical and biological attributes that, depending on the unique features of the site
and the program, may be analyzed during the site planning and design process. Chapter 7
(Site Inventory: Cultural Attributes) concentrates on documenting relevant cultural,
historic, and regulatory attributes. Chapter 8 (Site Analysis: Integration and Synthesis)
describes how site opportunities and constraints for specific project programs are identified
and documented in support of the subsequent phases of the site planning and design
process.
The last three chapters of the book are in Part IV, Design and Implementation. Chapter 9
(Conceptual Design) addresses the spatial organization of the programmed uses and
activities on the site. Chapter 10 (Design Development) addresses the spatial articulation
of the organizational framework established in the conceptual design phase. This chapter
explores design theory and ‘‘form-based’’ development regulations, which communities
are increasingly employing to guide development and shape changes to the built environ-
ment. Chapter 11 (Project Implementation), the book’s final chapter, addresses the
permitting and approval processes, techniques for mitigating development impacts, and
construction documentation and contract administration. The book concludes with an
Appendix and a Glossary. The Appendix lists both commercial, non-profit, and govern-
ment resources for data and other relevant planning and design information.
EDUCATIONAL USES
TABLE I-1 Partial results of a survey of more than 2000 landscape architects. Self-
assessment of work tasks (by rank) that affect public health, safety, and welfare.
Rank Task
activity’s perceived contribution to the protection of public health, safety, and welfare. This
is an important question because state licensing laws for landscape architects, architects, and
other professions are explicitly intended to protect public health, safety, and welfare.
Completed surveys were received from a randomly selected sample of more than 2000
landscape architects. Six of the fifteen most important tasks listed in the CLARB survey—
including two of the top three—involve either site selection or site analysis (Table I-1).
This second edition of Site Analysis is intended for students in introductory design
studios and site inventory/analysis courses in landscape architecture and students in site
planning courses in architecture and urban planning. These include both graduate and
undergraduate courses taught in universities throughout North America and, to a more
limited extent, in Europe, Central and South America, Africa, and Asia. This book is also
intended for practitioners studying for professional licensing exams in landscape archi-
tecture, architecture, or planning. Although the book is most relevant to professional
practice in North America, the text also should have utility in Europe, Asia, and other
developed and developing areas. Finally, this book also can serve as a resource to elected
local officials and citizens in the United States who serve on local boards and commissions
charged with reviewing site plans and land development proposals.
Acknowledgments
Maps and other project graphics for the first edition were generously provided by: Paul
Kissinger (Edward D. Stone, Jr., and Associates); Jim Fetterman (The HOK Planning
Group); Jack Scholl (Environmental Planning & Design); Fran Hegeler (Wallace, Roberts
& Todd, LLC); Meg Connolley (Land Design); and Bob Thorpe (R. J. Thorpe and
Associates).
Several educators provided insightful reviews of an early outline and synopsis of the
book’s first edition. Constructive critiques were received from Jack Ahern (University of
Massachusetts); Gary Clay (California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo);
Randy Gimblett (Arizona State University); Paul Hsu (Oklahoma State University); David
Hulse (University of Oregon); Nate Perkins (University of Guelph); Rob Ribe (University
of Oregon); and Peter Trowbridge (Cornell University). Additional assistance was
provided by Rosi LaGro and David LaGro.
For the second edition, generous contributions of additional maps and project graphics
were made by Jim Fetterman (The HOK Planning Group); Fran Hegeler and Jim Stickley
(Wallace, Roberts & Todd); and Paul Moyer (EDAW, Alexandria). The revision process was
aided by several published reviews of the first edition and by constructive suggestions from
three anonymous reviewers of the author’s second edition proposal to the publisher. David
LaGro also provided helpful comments on the proposal. Bridget Lang advised, cajoled, and
offered thoughtful and constructive reviews of the entire draft manuscript.
Margaret Cummins, acquisitions editor at John Wiley and Sons, facilitated the pro-
duction of both the first and second editions. Additional assistance from the publisher was
provided by Jennifer Mazurkie, James Harper, Kim Aleski, Lauren Poplawski, Amy Zarkos,
and copyeditor Elizabeth Marotta.
xii
part I
Site planning occurs within an environmental and cultural context. As human populations
have grown, society’s impacts on the earth’s ecosystems have increased. Sustainable
approaches to site planning attempt to minimize development impacts both on the site
and off-site. Vital environmental processes must be protected and, where feasible, degraded
ecosystems restored.
Part I of this book summarizes a contextual approach to site planning and design. The
first chapter addresses important design goals that can help shape better, and more
sustainable, built environments. The second chapter addresses the important role of
mapping and other forms of graphic communication in the site planning and design
process.
1
c h a p t e r 1
Sustainable design balances human needs (rather than human wants) with the
carrying capacity of the natural and cultural environments. It minimizes
environmental impacts, and it minimizes importation of goods and energy as well as
the generation of waste.
1.1 INTRODUCTION
Landscapes have long been settled, cultivated, and in other ways modified by humans. Yet
our ability to alter the earth’s atmosphere, oceans, and landscapes has exceeded our current
capacity to mitigate the impacts of these changes to our environment. Advances in
telecommunications technologies, combined with extensive transportation networks
and sprawl-inducing land use regulations, continue to loosen the geographic constraints
on land development spatial patterns.
‘‘Economic constraints on locational behavior are relaxing rapidly, and, as they do, the
geography of necessity gives way to a geography of choice. Transportation costs, markets,
and raw materials no longer determine the location of economic activities. We have deve-
loped an information-based economy in which dominant economic activities and the
people engaged in them enjoy unparalleled locational flexibility. In this spatial context,
amenity and ecological considerations are more important locational factors than in the past.
3
4 Site Analysis
Production Oxygen
Water
Food and fiber
Fuel and energy
Medicinal resources
Regulation Storage and recycling of organic matter
Decomposition and recycling of human waste
Regulation of local and global climate
Carrier Space for settlements
Space for agriculture
Space for recreation
Information Aesthetic resources
Historic (heritage) information
Scientific and educational information
Source: Adapted from deGroot, 1992, Table 2.0–1.
Cities located in amenity regions of North America are growing more rapidly than others
and such trends will intensify as society becomes more footloose’’ (Abler et al., 1975, p. 301).
The earth’s environmental systems perform a wide array of functions that are essential to
human health and welfare. For example, nature’s ‘‘infrastructure’’ helps protect the quality
of the air we breathe and the water we drink, and it provides many other environmental
‘‘goods and services.’’ In Functions of Nature, deGroot (1992) organizes nature’s beneficial
services into four functional categories: production, regulation, carrier, and information
(Table 1-1). These services sustain life on the planet.
The following indicators reveal, however, that human activities are degrading the
environment and imposing serious impacts on the earth’s capacity to sustain life:
& Sea level is projected to rise between 1.4 meter and 2.2 meters by 2100
& Growing hole in the ozone layer over Antarctica
Source: http://earthtrends.wri.org/
Additionally, hurricanes, floods, and other natural hazards increasingly threaten human
health, safety, and welfare. According to the National Science Foundation (NSF), since
1989 natural hazards have accounted for an average of about $1 billion in losses per week in
the United States. Many disasters causing the loss of life and property can be prevented,
or at least mitigated, by proactive decisions to reduce these risks (H. John Heinz, III, Center
for Science, Economics, and the Environment, 2000). Mileti (1999), who led the 132
experts, concludes the following:
The really big catastrophes are getting large and will continue to get larger, partly
because of things we’ve done in the past to reduce risk . . . . Many of the accepted
methods for coping with hazards have been based on the idea that people can
use technology to control nature to make them safe.
There are, in fact, practical limits to growth, and some locations are far more suitable for
development than others. For example, loss of life and property from natural hazards can be
avoided, or at least minimized, if the development of the built environment respects nature’s
patterns and processes.
The United Nations Environment Programme (2003) defines sustainability as ‘‘meeting the
needs of current and future generations through integration of environmental protection,
social advancement, and economic prosperity.’’ In Ottawa, Canada, as part of the process
for developing the city’s Official Plan (‘‘A Vision for Ottawa’’), citizens agreed to the
following set of community sustainability principles. A sustainable community
& minimizes harm to the natural environment, recognizes that growth occurs within
some limits, and is ultimately limited by the environment’s carrying capacity;
& respects other life forms and supports biodiversity;
& uses renewable and reliable sources of energy and fosters activities that use materials in
continuous cycles;
& does not compromise either the sustainability of other communities by its activities
(a geographic perspective) or the sustainability of future generations (a temporal
perspective);
& values cultural diversity;
6 Site Analysis
& employs ecological decision making (for example, integration of environmental criteria
into all municipal government, business, and personal decision-making processes);
& makes decisions and plans in a balanced, open, and flexible manner that includes the
perspectives from the community’s social, health, economic, and environmental
sectors;
& has shared values within the community (promoted through sustainability educa-
tion) and makes the best use of local efforts and resources (nurtures solutions at the
local level).
Source: www.web.net/ortee/scrp/20/23vision.html
Public policy plays a significant role in shaping the built environment (Ben-Joseph and
Szold, 2005). For example, zoning codes in the United States emerged in the early
twentieth century to protect public health, safety, and welfare (Platt, 2004). These land use
controls were effective in separating new residential areas from polluting industries and
ensuring that new housing construction met basic health and safety standards. Separating
incompatible land uses has long been justified in the United States as a legitimate ‘‘police
power’’ of local government (Platt, 2004). Some land use combinations, such as heavy
industry and housing, are inherently incompatible. However, zoning codes routinely
separate residential development from shops, restaurants, and other commercial uses, often
with detrimental consequences for the built environment and public health.
This approach to land use planning typically weakens community identity by facilitating
low-density suburban sprawl. In combination with transportation policy and planning
decisions, many zoning codes in the United States not only encourage sprawl but also
inhibit more sustainable forms of development. Although some communities have made
significant strides toward sustainable growth and pedestrian-friendly development, there is
a significant need in the United States for land use planning and regulatory reforms
(Schilling and Linton, 2005).
A vital step toward developing a sustainable community is to first identify the community’s
natural and cultural assets. The conservation of natural and cultural resources is a
fundamental site planning concern (Figure 1-1). Diamond and Noonan (1996, p. xix)
call for recognition of a broad set of community resources:
A constituency for better land use is needed based on new partnerships that
reach beyond traditional alliances to bring together conservationists, social justice
advocates, and economic development interests. These partnerships can be mobi-
lized around natural and cultural resources that people value.
According to Arendt (1999), there are nine fundamental types of natural and cultural
resources that should be inventoried at the community level:
Shaping the Built Environment 7
Figure 1-1 Natural and man-made factors influencing a greenway planning project along the Mississippi River in
St. Louis, Missouri, USA. Source: The HOK Planning Group.
& Woodlands
& Productive farmland
& Significant wildlife habitats
& Historic, archaeological, and cultural features
& Scenic viewsheds from public roads
The City of Portland, Oregon, has an Office of Sustainable Development whose mission is
‘‘to provide leadership and contribute practical solutions to ensure a prosperous community
where people and nature thrive, now and in the future’’ (www.portlandonline.com/osd).
Region
Spatial
Grain
Landscape
Site
Through outreach, technical assistance, policy and research, the Office of Sustainable
Development works to do the following:
& Increase the use of renewable energy and resources
& Reduce solid waste and conserve energy and natural resources
& Prevent pollution and improve personal and community health
Making the built environment more sustainable involves creating more transportation
options, more housing choices, and more pedestrian-friendly, mixed-use neighborhoods.
Smart Growth principles, endorsed by the American Planning Association and the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency, are practical goals for shaping—and reshaping—the
built environment. These principles, guiding both public and private sector decision
making, are summarized below.
Source: www.smartgrowth.org
Smart growth and sustainable design are complementary paradigms for shaping the built
environment. Both approaches encourage the development of pedestrian-friendly com-
munities that not only conserve but celebrate local cultural and natural resources.
site’s carrying capacity is a measure of the type and density of development that can be
supported without detrimental effects to society, the economy, or the environment
(Figure 1-3). The development of unsuitable sites—or poorly designed development
on otherwise suitable sites—can have many negative impacts.
Development impacts vary widely and affect a broad array of natural and cultural
resources (Sanford and Farley, 2004). On-site impacts may diminish visual quality and
reduce habitat for native vegetation and wildlife. Off-site impacts may include traffic
congestion, flooding, or pollution of local surface waters. In Guiding Principles of
Sustainable Design, for example, the U.S. National Park Service (1993) assesses the
potential environmental impacts of new park facility construction by seeking answers to
these questions:
& What inputs (energy, material, labor, products, and so on) are necessary to support a
development option and are the required inputs available?
& Can waste outputs (solid waste, sewage effluent, exhaust emissions, and so on) be
dealt with at acceptable environmental costs?
& Can development impacts be minimized?
A sustainable approach to site planning pays close attention to development intensity and
location and considers the initial benefits and impacts of development, as well as the
project’s life cycle costs. Site planning that is responsive to inherent environmental
constraints reduces construction costs, allows the continuation of critical environmental
processes, and protects intrinsic natural and cultural amenities. Sustainable site planning is
context-sensitive, therefore, minimizing negative development impacts by respecting the
Shaping the Built Environment 11
landscape’s natural patterns and processes (Figure 1-4). In Fostering Living Landscapes (1997,
p. 275), Carol Franklin writes:
The U.S. Green Building Council’s Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design
(LEED) rating systems for buildings, sites, and neighborhoods are voluntary guidelines that
are incrementally improving the sustainability of the built environment. Green buildings
enhance employee job satisfaction and productivity (Rocky Mountain Institute) and cost
substantially less to operate and maintain than conventional buildings. Careful choices of
construction materials and the use of energy and water conserving technologies also
reduce development impacts on the environment. Increased productivity, of course, can
enhance business profitability (Russell, 1997, pp. 54–55; Stein, 1997, pp. 54–55).
Sustainable development is good for business in other ways as well, such as improving
market competitiveness by creating favorable ‘‘experiences’’ that enhance customer
satisfaction. According to Pine and Gilmore (1999), customer ‘‘experiences’’ are the
foundation for future economic growth. Because unsustainable business practices can
12 Site Analysis
Mayors, bankers, real estate developers, and many others involved in urban affairs
contribute to the ‘‘design’’ or spatial configuration of the built environment. Some designs,
however, are far better than others. The arrangement and articulation of streets, buildings,
and all other site elements are ‘‘design decisions’’that—for better or worse—shape the built
environment. Design professionals, such as architects and landscape architects, are trained
to base these decisions on fundamental design principles, ethical standards, and a thorough
understanding of social and environmental context.
The average citizen may think that good design is a frill, or that it simply costs too much
to justify the expense. There are many reasons, however, to justify the expense of investing
in competent site planning and design. In Designing the City: A Guide for Advocates and Public
Officials, interviews with mayors, real estate developers, and other individuals expressed
strong opinions about the value of good design in the built environment (Bacow, 1995), as
follows:
Good design that is sustainable can reduce the long-term life-cycle costs of operating
and maintaining buildings, infrastructure, and sites within the built environment.
According to Joseph Romm (1995), up-front building and design costs may represent
only a fraction of the building’s life-cycle costs. When just 1 percent of a project’s up-front
costs are spent, up to 70 percent of its life-cycle costs may already be committed; when 7
percent of project costs are spent, up to 85 percent of life-cycle costs have been
committed. Consequently, sustainable design benefits society, the economy, and the
environment (Table 1-2).
Site planning is a multiphased process (Figure 1-5). Kevin Lynch (1971, pp.3–4) defined
site planning as follows:
Site planning is the art of arranging the external physical environment to support
human behavior. It lies along the boundaries of architecture, engineering, land-
scape architecture, and city planning, and it is practiced by members of all these
professions. Site plans locate structures and activities in three-dimensional space
and, when appropriate, in time.
14 Site Analysis
Programming
Site
Site Conceptual Design Construction Project
Inventory
Analysis Design Development Documentation Implementation
(Biological)
Site
Selection
Site
Inventory
(Cultural)
Equally important, site planning also involves choices about where not to build. Site
planning must be informed, therefore, by a thorough understanding of the site’s
character and context. Sustainable site planning protects and restores degraded natural
and cultural resources and minimizes detrimental impacts of development on the
environment.
Programming
Site-planning projects vary not only in site areas and locations within the urban-rural
continuum but also in prospective site uses. One project might involve the construction of
roads, buildings, and other infrastructure. Another project might not have any new
construction but focuses instead on the conservation, restoration, and management of
natural areas or cultural resources. Programming defines the project’s objectives and
functional requirements, including the proposed activities, area allocated for each activity,
and the functional or spatial relationships among those activities.
Shaping the Built Environment 15
The program focuses the subsequent analysis and design activities. The program for a
multifamily housing project, for example, might include the number, type, and density of
housing units that will be constructed on the site (Table 1-3).
The program may be developed by the client alone, or with the assistance of consultants
with programming expertise. Programming often includes market analyses, or user
demand studies, and the analysis of relevant precedents. Client objectives and preferences
for the project are also considered, including the desired uses, special features, design styles,
budgets for various project components, and maintenance concerns. An in-depth dis-
cussion of programming can be found in Chapter 4.
Site Selection
Land development typically occurs in one of two ways: clients have a site and choose a
program to develop on that site, or clients have a program of intended uses and need a site
for those uses. Across the urban–rural continuum, parcels of land vary greatly in size, shape,
character, and context. Site selection involves identifying and evaluating alternative sites
and selecting the best location for the intended program. More details on the site selection
process can be found in Chapter 3.
Site Inventory
Collectively, the features of the site and its surroundings, in conjunction with the project’s
program, determine the attribute data that are collected for the site inventory. Site
inventories map important physical, biological, and social or cultural attributes (Table
1-4). These may include circulation patterns and traffic volumes, existing utility systems,
or architectural character within the surrounding built environment. On large projects,
attribute mapping and analysis are particularly well suited for applications of geographic
information systems. Ecologists, hydrologists, anthropologists, and other experts may
participate in collecting, mapping, and analyzing site and contextual attribute data. Yet
for any given program and site, there are always attributes that can be ignored to make the
process more efficient. The project’s program—or intended uses of the site—helps limit
the scope of this data collection effort. Chapters 5, 6, and 7 examine the site inventory
processes in greater detail.
TABLE 1-4 Examples of physical, biological, and cultural attributes that may be mapped
at the site scale.
Categories Subcategories Attributes
16
Shaping the Built Environment 17
Biological
Biological
Attributes
Cultural
Attributes
Land Use
Suitability
Site Analysis
The site analysis summarizes the site’s suitability for the programmed uses. A variety of
physical, biological, and cultural attributes can influence the site’s suitability for the project
under consideration. Information contained in the site’s inventory maps can be synthesized
to create one or more maps of the site’s suitability for development, generally, or its
suitability for specific program objectives (Figure 1-6).
Site suitability for a specific project is a function of the site’s assets and liabilities—or
opportunities and constraints. The assets (opportunities) associated with a site may be
unique natural or cultural resources that warrant protection. These assets may enhance the
site’s aesthetic quality and contribute to the site’s sense of place within the community or
region. Many sites include degraded natural areas that should be restored or enhanced in
conjunction with the site’s development. Site constraints include chemical contamination
from prior commercial or industrial uses. The site analysis may assess whether environ-
mental remediation is needed, what action should be taken to protect adjacent properties
from contamination, and what buildings and infrastructures can be used or recycled (Platt
18 Site Analysis
TABLE 1-5 Hazards, constraints, or nuisances that may influence site selection and
development
Categories Hazards Constraints Nuisances
and Curran, 2003). The site analysis also considers regulatory constraints such as zoning and
other land use controls.
Mapping the site’s opportunities and constraints is essential for sustainable land planning
and design (Table 1-5). Providing an understanding of the site within its biophysical and
socio-cultural context, the site analysis can be useful to allied professions engaged in the
land development and impact mitigation process (see Figure 1-7). More detailed informa-
tion on this process is available in Chapter 8.
Law Planning
(Due diligence) (Site plan review)
A site inventory—mapping the site’s physical, biological, and cultural attributes—is not
a site analysis. A vegetation map, for example, may show the site’s existing conditions for a
single attribute—the locations of plant communities and also, perhaps, individual specimen
trees. This map, like other inventory maps, is valid for any use that might be considered for
that site. The fate of the existing vegetation depends on the decisions made in subsequent
phases of the site-planning process.
Conceptual Design
Site design is an iterative process transitioning from the general to the more specific.
Concept development, the process of adapting the program to the site, flows directly
from the site analysis. Sustainable site design adapts the project’s program elements to
the unique features of the site. Topography, climate, and hydrology, for example, are
important environmental factors that shape the design of the built environment.
Cultural attributes, including local history and architecture, are also important design
determinants.
Concept plans spatially organize the project’s proposed elements and on-site improve-
ments. If the program is unrealistic, the design concept and, potentially, budget estimates
should reveal those deficiencies, resulting either in a revision of the program and concept,
or the selection of a different site. Creating two or more concept plans is particularly useful
when seeking consensus from a diverse set of stakeholders. If one concept is clearly superior
to the others, then the evidence supporting the better alternative is made more persuasive
by comparing it to feasible, but less desirable, alternatives. Frequently, the best concept will
be a hybrid plan that is created by merging ideas from two or more alternative concepts.
Examples of concept plans, and a more detailed discussion of conceptual design, can be
found in Chapter 9.
Design Development
On a concept plan, major program elements—and important existing conditions—are
drawn diagrammatically. Circulation pathways are often portrayed as ‘‘arrows,’’ for
example, and major uses or activity zones are portrayed as ‘‘bubbles.’’ The design
development process refines, or spatially articulates, these diagrammatic elements of the
concept plan. Regardless of the project’s program, design development involves docu-
menting—with plans, sections, elevations, and three-dimensional perspectives—how the
plan’s components will appear and relate to one another functionally. Subsequent design
iterations define and articulate the buildings, walls, parking lots, pathways, and other
‘‘hard’’ and ‘‘soft’’ spaces within each of the general land use areas.
Construction Documentation
The construction drawings (that is, plans, elevations, sections, and details) together with
the written construction specifications comprise the construction documents (C.D.s). The
C.D.s are prepared to ensure that the implementation of the project accurately reflects the
20 Site Analysis
approved designs. Once this documentation is complete and the necessary financing and
approvals are acquired, the project can be implemented.
Depending on the location and scope of the project, approvals and permits may be required
from government agencies at the local, state or provincial, and national levels. Local
government, especially, plays a significant role in shaping the built environment through
the site plan and development review process. More detailed information on this process
can be found in Chapter 11.
Projects with no buildings include parks, greenways, and other active and/or passive
recreation or nature conservation areas. These are an important but relatively small
percentage of professional site planning. Projects involving the siting of one or more
commercial or residential building, for example, are much more common. Ideally, the
design of the site’s building is integrally linked with the planning and design of the site. This
typically requires close coordination—particularly during the design-development
phase—between the project’s architects and landscape architects. Projects involving the
siting of several buildings offer opportunities to arrange the buildings in connected
sequences of carefully designed outdoor space.
Good site planning requires not only a broad set of skills and knowledge but also the
ethics and values to protect critical environmental areas and create sustainable and livable
places. Poor site planning may create a variety of unintended consequences. A poorly
designed site may, for example, create a vehicle-dominated development that ignores
pedestrian needs. Poor design may also create vehicle circulation conflicts, increase human
exposure to natural hazards, or degrade environmental quality.
The site planning and design process is far from trivial, as evidenced by professional
licensing examinations for architects and landscape architects (NCARB, 2005; CLARB,
Shaping the Built Environment 21
delineate areas suitable for the construction of buildings and other site improve-
ments responding to regulatory restrictions and programmatic requirements . . .
and define a site profile and maximum buildable envelope based on zoning
regulations and environmental constraints.
Both the ARE and the Landscape Architect Registration Exam (LARE) recognize the
complexity of site planning, and test for competence in relevant areas. The LARE’s ‘‘site
design’’ section, for example, states:
Landscape architects are expected to develop site or land use plans that take into
consideration the off-site and on-site influences to development. Landscape
architects must consider various codes, consultant studies, and principles of sus-
tainability when creating a site design.
1.6 CONCLUSION
Visualization of Spatial
Information
2.1 INTRODUCTION
Visual or graphic imagery are an effective and efficient way to communicate both abstract
and concrete ideas (Ackoff, 1989, pp. 3–9). Adapting the project’s program to the unique
conditions of the site requires information—typically, derived from an analysis of the site
and its immediate surroundings. Transforming this data into spatially explicit information
(for example, maps) is an essential part of the site planning and design process.
This chapter addresses the visualization of spatial information in site planning. It
summarizes important principles of cartography—or mapmaking—describes the com-
ponents of a geographic information system (GIS), and explores some of the ways that this
information technology can facilitate the site inventory and analysis process. Sources of
spatial data, including aerial photographs, LIDAR, and global positioning systems (GPS),
are discussed. This chapter also examines fundamental principles of graphic communica-
tion for planning and design.
The site planning and design process is a series of activities that involves the visualization of
diverse spatial information. Communicating this information graphically helps clients,
consultants, and other stakeholders understand—and participate in—the planning and
design process. Maps, models, and other illustrative materials play an important role in
23
24 Site Analysis
effective communication about the project objectives, existing conditions of the site and its
context, and ideas for the site’s design.
Systems theorists speculate that the content of the human mind can be classified into the
following five categories (Ackoff, 1989, pp. 3–9; Bellinger et al., 2004):
& Data
& Information
& Knowledge
& Understanding
& Wisdom
The first four categories concern what is or has been known about the present or the past.
Information, for example, answers the questions of ‘‘who,’’ ‘‘what,’’ ‘‘where,’’ and ‘‘when’’;
knowledge answers the question of ‘‘how’’; and understanding provides an appreciation of the
question ‘‘why’’ (Ackoff, 1989, pp. 3–9). The fifth category, wisdom, concerns the future,
enabling the application of knowledge, understanding, and the utilization of information to
design and visualize alternative futures.
Site planners must understand a site’s past and present, within its spatial and temporal
context, to effectively design the site’s sustainable future. Design, therefore, is an expression
of wisdom—building on and synthesizing information, knowledge, and understanding of
the natural and built environments (Figure 2-1).
Symbols are used alone and in combination to convey information about existing
site and contextual conditions. Important features of a site and its surroundings may be
graphically depicted as points, lines, or polygons. In some instances, individual elements
are portrayed by a combination of two or more symbols. Whether drawn by hand or
with the aid of a computer, symbols convey information about both existing and
proposed site elements. This information includes site hazards and constraints. It also
includes site assets, amenities, and opportunities to accommodate the project program and
add value— aesthetically, ecologically, and/or economically.
Effective diagrams and other graphics simplify reality and reveal significant patterns and
processes. Edward T. White (1983, p.1) comments:
We designers are often more comfortable and skilled at drawing plans, elevations,
sections, and perspectives than at diagramming project needs, issues, and require-
ments. We sometimes seem overly anxious to draw the architectural answers to
ill-defined project questions and reluctant to invest in graphic techniques that
help us better understand the project needs and that stimulate responsive and
creative design concepts.
Diagramming is also an effective way to communicate information about the proposed
design of a project. Diagrams may convey information, for example, about the desired
relationships among existing and proposed site elements. Without this supporting evi-
dence, why should public sector reviewers believe that a land development proposal is
appropriate for the site? And how can they or other community stakeholders offer
suggestions for possible improvements to the plan?
When preparing to communicate project information graphically, five factors should be
considered: message, medium, audience, setting, and time (Wester, 1990).
Message
Efforts to communicate graphically may have one of three results: the message is received as
sent; the message is not received; or a message is received, but the message is not what was
intended. The message will vary from one phase of the planning and design process to the
next, of course, and from one site to another. During the site inventory, for example,
essential information will include the locations of significant constraints such as steep
slopes, shallow bedrock, or wetlands. During concept development, however, essential
information includes the locations of proposed buildings and pedestrian and vehicular
circulation systems, including the physical linkages among them.
Medium
Because the messages vary throughout the site planning and design process, the techniques
for communicating this diverse information must also vary. Construction drawings, for
example, are not only technical but also legal documents that are part of the contract for a
project’s implementation. These drawings must be precisely drafted—whether by hand or
with a computer. In contrast, concept plans may be simple ‘‘bubble’’diagrams. The concept
plan is a diagram showing the future spatial organization of the site. This is relatively
informal and is often drawn—not drafted—in a ‘‘loose’’ graphic style (Linn, 1993). Clarity
is achieved by simplifying the message and by omitting extraneous information. Too much
precision may convey to reviewers that the plan is already ‘‘etched in stone.’’ Consequently,
a highly refined concept plan may inhibit ‘‘buy in’’ of stakeholders and limit constructive
dialogue on potential improvements to the plan.
Audience
Project graphics should help orient and inform the intended audience. In site planning and
design, graphic communication is often intended for multiple audiences. On many
26 Site Analysis
projects, the audience includes the client, design team, government officials, planning
commissions, and other community stakeholders. An audience’s expertise and familiarity
with planning and design should determine what—and how—project information is
conveyed. This often requires emphasizing the most important information and omitting
less important and potentially distracting information.
Setting
The setting for communicating project information should be considered when preparing
and organizing graphic information. If a presentation will occur in a large public meeting
room, digital photographs and illustrations may be projected with a laptop computer and
video projector in a Microsoft PowerPoint presentation. In a smaller setting, like a
conference room, drawings mounted on foam-core presentation boards may be more
appropriate. Displaying the full array of drawings can help facilitate a more productive
dialogue with the audience.
Time
The amount of time available to prepare and present the graphic materials determines, in
part, which graphic techniques to employ. A ‘‘quick and dirty’’ tracing paper presentation
may be appropriate for discussing alternative concepts with the client and other members
of the design team. Whether the images will be available to the audience for subsequent
review is also a consideration. If the audience has the opportunity to study the work, then
more information can be conveyed with detailed labels, notes, and—if appropriate—tables
and graphs.
To make a map, the following three basic elements must be known (Fisher, 1982, p. 5):
& Study space
& Information or values to be displayed
& Locations, within the space, to which the information applies
Throughout human history, maps have been drawn or printed on cloth, paper, mylar,
and other surfaces. Today, site planners increasingly rely on computer-generated digital
maps—or hard-copy maps plotted from digital data. Regardless of the medium by which
Visualization of Spatial Information 27
maps are presented, several issues must be considered, including map scale, measurement
scale, and map projection.
Map scale defines the spatial relationship between mapped features and the actual
dimensions represented on the map. The map scale is the ratio of the distance on the
map to the distance on the surface portrayed by the map. Map scale, therefore, is commonly
expressed as a reduction ratio (e.g., 1:24,000). A map of the world, for example, would have
a very large unit of surface measurement (e.g., 1:12,000,000), whereas a map of a city would
have a much smaller unit of surface measurement (e.g., 1:5000). Small map ratios (with
large units of surface measurement) correspond to large map scales. In other words, a map’s
scale gets larger as the map’s unit of measurement becomes closer in size to the geographic
unit of measurement. As a rule of thumb, large-scale maps have reduction ratios of 1:50,000
or less; small-scale maps have reduction ratios of 1:500,000 or more (Robinson et al., 1995).
Map scale also may be expressed in actual units of distance measure. In the United States,
where businesses and governments still employ the English measurement system, map scale
is often expressed in inches and feet (e.g., 1 inch = 200 feet). This is especially common
in site planning. Converting map scale from a ratio to an equation is straightforward
(Table 2-1). Converting linear or area measurements between English and metric scales also
may be necessary (Table 2-2).
TABLE 2-2 Conversion of length and area between metric and English units of
measurement.
Measure Unit (English) Unit (Metric)
Attribute values may be mapped as either absolute or derived values, but these values are
typically expressed in one of the following four measurement scales (Table 2-3):
& Nominal
& Ordinal
& Interval
& Ratio
Nominal Scale
Attribute values that do not imply rank or order are expressed as nominal categories. Land
use, for example, is an attribute that is expressed in this way. Land use classes include
residential, commercial, and industrial uses. Although these land uses differ in many ways,
land use is not an attribute that implies rank or quantity. Land cover is another attribute that
can be mapped and displayed on a nominal scale.
Ordinal Scale
The ordinal scale of measurement conveys a gradation or ranking of elements. For example,
the U.S. Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) ranks soils by the limitations
they present to various types of agriculture, recreation, and construction. Site limitations
for excavations to construct building foundations range from no significant constraints at
one end of the gradient to severe constraints at the other end.
Interval Scale
The interval scale of measurement applies to attributes with continuous spatial distribu-
tions. This measurement scale has equal increments between units, but zero does not have
Visualization of Spatial Information 29
Ratio Scale
The ratio scale of measurement divides one attribute value by another. Topographic slope,
for example, is an attribute measured on the ratio scale. Gradient values are computed by
dividing the slope’s vertical change in elevation by the slope’s horizontal length. Slope
values may be expressed as either a ratio (e.g., 3:1) or a percentage (e.g., 33 percent). A slope
expressed as a percentage value is the angle of the slope relative to a horizontal, or flat,
surface. Percentages are typically used to quantify the slope gradient of hillsides and
unpaved site surfaces. Ratio values are commonly used in the building industry to quantify
roof slopes, or pitches.
Maps are classified by scale, function, or subject matter (Robinson et al., 1995). Three basic
map types, distinguished by function, are as follows:
Although serving different purposes, each map type may have features occurring in one of
the other types. Reference maps and thematic maps are particularly useful in planning and
design (Table 2-4).
TABLE 2-4 Examples of reference maps, thematic maps, and navigational charts.
Class Information Conveyed
Reference Maps
Reference maps convey information about a variety of natural and cultural phenomena.
Plat maps (Figure 2-2), for example, portray land ownership by showing the individual land
parcels delimited by ownership boundaries. A plat map is a planimetric reference map,
portraying only the horizontal positions of features (in two-dimensional space). A
topographic map is another common form of reference map. These maps show natural
and built features and the terrain’s relief. Landforms are graphically portrayed with
Visualization of Spatial Information 31
contours—isolines that link points of equal elevation—and some topographic maps use
shading and color. Typically, these maps also show buildings, utility corridors, and roads.
Other potentially useful reference maps include street and utility maps, flood hazard maps,
and wetland maps (see Appendix).
Old reference maps may be valuable sources of information to learn about the historic uses
of a site. These historic maps can be particularly useful when a site’s prior land uses suggest
that hazardous wastes may exist on the site (American Society of Civil Engineers, 1996).
Sanborn maps of cities in the United States were created between 1867 and 1970 to assist fire
insurance companies in assessing the risks of insuring properties (Environmental Data
Resources, Inc., www.edrnet.com). A collection of more than 1.2 million Sanborn maps
document the history of approximately 12,000 cities and towns. These maps are available
online at most university libraries, major public libraries, and at the U.S. Library of Congress.
Thematic Maps
Thematic maps express information about a single, spatially distributed attribute. Bio-
physical as well as cultural site attributes can be portrayed with two types of thematic maps:
= Suitable
Näin kului puoli tuntia, jonka jälkeen hän kuuli tuolin narahduksen
ulommasta huoneesta ja senjälkeen edusmiehen askeleet hänen
kävellessään edestakaisin kuin häkkiin suljettu eläin. Kerran nämä
askeleet saapuivat aivan hänen ovelleen ja pysähtyivät siihen.
Neitonen jäykistyi. Hän tunsi ihonsa käyvän kananlihalle, tunsi
valtimoittensa sykkivän kiivaammin tuon vaitiolon aikana, joka tuntui
hänestä loppumattomalta, ja odotti kolkutusta. Se kuului vihdoin
terävästi napautettuna, ja siitä hän karahti seisaalleen.
Hänessä oli varsin paljon sutta sinä aamuna — sutta, joka etsii
kynsistään livahtanutta karitsaa ja edeltäpäin nuoleskelee huuliaan
ajatellessaan säälimätöntä ateriaa, jonka ahmien nauttisi, sittenkun
tuo karitsa vihdoin olisi löydetty ja palautettu hänen haltuunsa.
Hän pysähtyi Rouguesiin hiukan haukkaamaan ja juomaan
lasillisen konjakkia ja vettä, sillä hän oli einehtimättä ratsastanut La
Charitésta, kannusti sitten jälleen ratsunsa laukkaan ja saapui
puolenpäivän aikaan Neversiin. Hän meni suoraapäätä Neversin
vallankumouskomitean puheenjohtajan, lihavan, raskasruumiisen
nahkurin luo, nimeltä Desjardins ja ilmoitti, mitä hän välittömästi
tarvitsi. Hänen paperinsa oli viime yönä La Charitéssa varastanut
muuan nuorukainen, jota hän oli holhonnut ja joka, kuten hän nyt
tiesi, olikin tyttö, epäilemättä joku kirottu ylimysmielinen. Hänen
tiedettiin ratsastaneen Neversiin päin. Kenties hän yrittäisi esiintyä
Chauvinièren kirjurina. Hänen vangitsemisensa oli äärimmäisen
tärkeää. Päitä putoilisi, jollei häntä tavoitettaisi. Chauvinière pitäisi
siitä huolen. Desjardinsin oli heti kerättävä turvallisuuskomitean
toimitsijat, selostettava heille tapaus ja usutettava heidät varasta
tavoittamaan.