Informal fallacies

Informal fallacies are errors in reasoning

that occur because of issues with the
content or context of an argument, rather
than flaws in its logical structure. They
often stem from poor, misleading, or
irrelevant information, rather than strictly
violating formal rules of logic. Informal
fallacies are common in everyday language
and debates and can make arguments
seem convincing, even though they lack a
solid foundation.
Types of Informal
fallacies
1. Ad Hominem – Attacking the
person making the argument
rather than addressing the
argument itself.

Example: "You can’t trust his

opinion on climate change
because he’s not a scientist."
2.Appeal to Emotion (Argumentum
ad Populum) – Using emotions,
such as pity, fear, or anger, to
persuade others to accept the
argument instead of using logical
reasons.

Example: "We should pass this law

because young people addicted to
drugs are pitiful."
3. Straw Man – Misrepresenting or
oversimplifying someone’s
argument to make it easier to refute.

Example:"You want to lower the

defense budget? So you think we
should have no military at all?"
4. False Dilemma(or False
Dichotomy) – Presenting only two
options when more exist, forcing a
choice between limited alternatives.

Example:"Either we ban all cars, or

we let pollution continue to rise
unchecked."
5.Circular Reasoning – Using a
statement as both the premise and
the conclusion, effectively "begging
the question."

Example:"This policy is the best

because it’s better than all the others."
6. Slippery Slope – Arguing that a
small step will inevitably lead to a
chain of related (often extreme)
events.

Example: "If we allow students to

redo one test, soon they’ll expect to
retake every test."
7. Hasty Generalization – Making
a broad generalization based on
limited or insufficient evidence.

Example:"I met two rude tourists

from that country, so everyone
from there must be rude."
Informal fallacies are often
persuasive because they appeal
to emotions, biases, or
assumptions, rather than relying
on sound logic. Recognizing these
fallacies can help in analyzing
arguments critically and forming
stronger arguments of your own.
Fallacies of Presumption
Fallacies of presumption are a type of
informal fallacy where an argument is
flawed because it assumes too much or
takes certain premises for granted
without providing sufficient evidence.
These fallacies often make unjustified
assumptions, which can lead to
misleading or erroneous conclusions.
They rely on unfounded beliefs or hidden
premises that skew reasoning.
Fallacies of Presumption
1.Begging the Question – The argument
assumes what it is trying to prove,
effectively using the conclusion as one of
its premises.

Example:"Democracy is the best form of

government because democratic nations
are the best."
- Here, it’s assumed without evidence
that democratic nations are the best.
2. Complex Question (Loaded Question) –
A question that assumes a particular
answer or presupposes information,
trapping the respondent.

Example: "Have you stopped wasting

company time?"
- This question assumes that the person
was previously wasting company time,
regardless of their answer.
3. False Cause – Assuming a causal
relationship between two events just
because one follows the other, without
adequate evidence of a cause-effect
connection.

Example: "Since we started using that brand

of cleaning products, productivity has gone
up, so the products must be the cause."
- This fallacy assumes causation based on
correlation without enough evidence.
4. False Dichotomy (False Dilemma) –
Presenting only two choices as if they are
the only options, ignoring other
possibilities.

Example: "We can either improve public

health by banning all fast food or continue
to let people suffer."
- This ignores other approaches to
improving public health and assumes only
two extreme options.
5.Accident– Misapplying a general rule to
a specific case where it doesn’t fit

Example:"Freedom of speech means I can

say whatever I want, even if it’s harmful."
- Here, the general principle of free
speech is extended to situations where
restrictions might actually be justified.
6.Hasty Generalization– Drawing a broad
conclusion based on limited or insufficient
evidence.

Example:"My friend had a bad experience

at that restaurant, so the entire chain
must be terrible."
- This assumes that one experience
reflects the overall quality of the chain.
7.Suppressed Evidence – Ignoring relevant
evidence that could contradict the
argument, often leading to a biased or one-
sided conclusion.

Example: "All my friends are getting

married, so everyone my age must be
married."
- This overlooks evidence that not all
people in that age group are getting
married.
Fallacies of presumption are persuasive
because they take advantage of
assumptions that may seem plausible or
are easy to overlook. Recognizing these
fallacies can help in identifying where an
argument may be misleading or based
on unjustified assumptions.
Fallacies of relevance
Fallacies of relevance are a type of
informal fallacy where the argument is
flawed because it relies on evidence or
premises that are not directly related to
the main issue. Instead of providing
reasons that actually support the
argument, these fallacies distract,
mislead, or appeal to irrelevant factors,
often causing the argument to seem
more persuasive than it actually is.
1.Ad Hominem– Attacking the person
making the argument rather than
addressing the argument itself.

Example: "You shouldn’t listen to her

opinion on finance; she’s not rich."
- The argument focuses on the person’s
financial status rather than the validity of
her argument.
2. Appeal to Emotion – Using emotions
such as pity, fear, or pride to influence an
audience, rather than logical reasoning.

Example:"Think of the children! We must

pass this law."
- This tries to manipulate the audience’s
feelings rather than presenting logical
reasons for the law.
3. Appeal to Popularity(Bandwagon) –
Arguing that something is true or correct
just because many people believe it.

Example:"Everyone I know thinks this

diet works, so it must be effective."
- This assumes popularity equals truth
or effectiveness without actual evidence.
4. Red Herring – Introducing an unrelated
or irrelevant topic to distract from the
main issue.

Example: "Why worry about climate

change when there are so many
homeless people?"
- This diverts attention from the climate
change discussion without addressing it
directly.
5.Straw Man– Misrepresenting or
oversimplifying an opponent's
argument to make it easier to refute.

Example: "People who support free

college just want everything for free."
- This misrepresents the argument by
making it seem extreme or unrealistic.
6.Appeal to Tradition – Arguing that
something is correct or better simply
because it has always been done that
way.
Example:"We shouldn’t change the
rules; we’ve been following them for
decades."
- This assumes that tradition alone
justifies the rules, without considering
reasons for change.
7. Appeal to Ignorance – Claiming
something is true (or false) simply
because it hasn’t been proven
otherwise.

Example:"No one has proven aliens

don’t exist, so they must be out there."
- This argument relies on a lack of
evidence rather than any actual proof.
8. Genetic Fallacy– Judging something
as good or bad based on its origin
rather than its current value or truth.

Example:"His idea can’t be trusted

because it came from a political party I
dislike."
- This focuses on the source of the
idea rather than the idea itself.
9. Appeal to Authority – Relying on the
opinion of an authority figure in an
unrelated field as evidence.

Example: "This diet must work because

a famous actor uses it."
- The actor’s expertise is unrelated to
nutrition, making this an irrelevant
appeal.
Fallacies of relevance are often
persuasive because they distract, appeal
to biases, or create emotional responses,
making them appear reasonable even
though they don’t directly address the
issue at hand. Recognizing these
fallacies helps improve critical thinking
by focusing on arguments that are
logically relevant.
THANK YOU