0% found this document useful (0 votes)
4 views6 pages

Initiatory Pleading-Santos, Victoria

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1/ 6

Republic of the Philippines

Integrated Bar of the Philippines


COMMISSION ON BAR DISCIPLINE
Julia Vargas Ave., Ortigas Center
Pasig City

JOSE CASTILLO
Complainant,
CBD Case No. 24-5678
For: Disbarment

-versus-

ATTY. GREG ALVAREZ


Respondent.

X------------------------------------------------------------------------x

DISBARMENT COMPLAINT

Complainant, Jose Castillo, by counsel, respectfully submits a


disbarment complaint against Atty. Greg Alvarez, a member of the
Philippine Bar for violating the Code of Professional Responsibility and
Accountability (CPRA) and other pertinent laws governing the practice of
law.

PARTIES OF THE CASE

Complainant, Jose Castillo, of legal age, Filipino, and a resident of #7


Smoothie St., Brgy. Dreamscape, Lipa City, Batangas;

Respondent, Atty. Greg Alvarez is a member of the Philippine Bar


with Roll No. 1234567 and has an office located at #127 Lemonde St., Brgy.
Neolink, Lipa City, Batangas;

BACKGROUND OF THE CASE

This action offshoots from a complaint filed by Mark Lee before the
Regional Trial Court, Branch 59, Quezon Province, against Jose Castillo, the
respondent herein.

In the civil case filed on July 16, 2023, Mark Lee (complainant)
sought an award for damages, including attorney's fees and other costs, and
requested that Jose Castillo (respondent) be ordered to pay the remaining
overdue rental amounting to P50,000.00, plus interest and penalties.

During the pre-trial hearing, the Court ordered both parties to attempt
settlement. The parties agreed to the settlement and the Court directed the
complainant to submit a proposed settlement agreement to the Court and to
the respondent.

On December 23, 2023, Mark Lee, through his counsel, submitted a


proposed settlement amounting to P300,000.00, which included the overdue
rental fees, attorney's fees, and damages.

On January 25, 2024, the Honorable Court issued an order directing


the respondent, Jose Castillo, to pay the settlement amount as proposed by
the complainant.

STATEMENT OF FACTS

On July 20, 2024, Complainant Jose Castillo engaged the legal


services of Atty. Alvarez to represent him in a civil settlement case
concerning breach of contract.

In the course of the pre-trial hearing, the Court required for the
settlement of the case and ordered the respondent to pay for the
corresponding proposed amount given by the complainant.

On January 26, 2024, the complainant entrusted Atty. Alvarez with


P300,000.00 to be paid to the opposing party as part of a settlement. On the
same day, Atty. Alvarez issued a personal receipt acknowledging the receipt
of the P300,000.00 as payment for the settlement. A copy of the receipt is
attached hereto as Exhibit A.

However, on March 23, 2024, Jose Castillo received a letter from the
opposing party’s counsel, demanding immediate payment for the settlement
of the civil case. Upon learning of the opposing party’s demand, Jose
Castillo made multiple inquiries to Atty. Alvarez regarding the status of the
payment. Despite these inquiries, Atty. Alvarez failed to provide any
substantial explanation or evidence that the payment had been made.

Despite the complainant's repeated requests for updates, Atty. Alvarez


did not provide any reasonable accounting or justification regarding the
handling of the entrusted funds. Furthermore, Atty. Alvarez ignored all of
Jose Castillo's communications, compounding his misconduct.

As a result of Atty. Alvarez’s failure to act in accordance with his


professional obligations, the settlement agreement collapsed, leaving the
matter unresolved. Moreover, Jose Castillo has suffered significant
emotional and financial distress due to the respondent’s breach of trust and
failure to fulfill his duties as a lawyer.

CAUSES OF ACTION

Atty. Alvarez’s actions constitute grave misconduct and


misappropriation of client funds, both of which are grounds for disbarment
under the Philippine law. The relevant provisions of the Code of Professional
Responsibility (CPRA) and the Rules of Court provide as follows:

Canon 2, Section 1 of the Code of Professional Responsibility and


Accountability:

Propern Conduct. – A lawyer shall not engage in unlawful, dishonest,


immoral, or deceitful conduct.

Canon 3, Section 49 of the Code of Professional Responsibility and


Accountability:

Accounting during engagement. – A lawyer, during the existence of


the lawyer-client relationship, shall account for and prepare an inventory of
any fund or property belonging to the client, whether received from the latter
or from a third person, immediately upon such receipt.

When funds are entrusted to a lawyer by a client for a specific


purpose, the lawyer shall use such funds only for the client’s declared
purpose. Any unused amount of the entrustedc funds shall be promptly
returned to the client upon accomplishment of the stated purpose or the
client’s demand.

Canon 3, Section 50 of the Code of Professional Responsibility and


Accountability:

Separate funds. – A lawyer shall keep the funds of the clients separate
and apart from his or her own and those of others kept by the lawyer.

Canon 4, Rule 6 of the Code of Professional Responsibility and


Accountability:

Duty to update the client. – A lawyer shall regularly inform the client
of the status and the result of the matter undertaken, and any action in
connection thereto, and shall respond within a reasonable time to the client’s
request for information.
Section 27, Rule 138 of the Rules of Court:

A lawyer may be disbarred for grave misconduct or for conduct that is


unbecoming of a lawyer. Misappropriating client funds and failing to honor
fiduciary duties clearly falls under this provision.

DOCUMENTARY EVIDENCE

To support the allegations of misappropriation and misconduct, the


following documents are submitted as evidence:

Exhibit A – A copy of the personal receipt issued by Atty. Greg Alvarez for
the P300,000 received from Jose Castillo.

Exhibit B – A sworn statement from the opposing party, confirming that


they did not receive the P300,000.00 settlement payment.

Exhibit C – A sworn affidavit from Jose Castillo detailing the series of


events, including his repeated requests for an update on the payment and his
discovery of the failure to remit the funds.

Exhibit D – Copies of emails, letters, and other communications sent by


Jose Castillo to Atty. Alvarez, requesting the status of the payment, all of
which were ignored or left unanswered by Atty. Alvarez.

PRAYER

WHEREFORE, in light of the foregoing, Complainant Jose Castillo


respectfully prays that the Honorable Commission on Bar Discipline of the
Integrated Bar of the Philippines:

1. Take appropriate action on this complaint and initiate proceedings for


disbarment against Atty. Greg Alvarez;
2. Conduct a full and fair investigation into the misconduct of Atty. Greg
Alvarez;
3. Disbar Atty. Greg Alvarez for grave misconduct and misappropriation
of client funds, and for violating the ethical standards required of a
member of the Philippine Bar;
4. Order Atty. Greg Alvarez to return the full amount of P300,000 to the
complainant, with damages, if applicable; and
5. Grant any other relief deemed just and proper under the
circumstances.
Lipa City for Pasig City.

April 25, 2024

ATTY. VICTORIA ELIZABETH T. SANTOS


Counsel for the Complainant
Roll of Attorney’s No. 020995 - 05/23/2010;
IBP No. 127 - 1/18/2024 - Pasig City;
P.T.R. No. 1234567- Lipa City;
MCLE No. VIII-020196 - March 20, 2025

Copy furnished through personal service:

ATTY. GREG ALVAREZ


#127 Lemonde St., Brgy. Neolink, Lipa City, Batangas
Republic of the Philippines )
Lipa City ) S.S.

VERIFICATION AND CERTIFICATION OF NON-FORUM


SHOPPING

I, JOSE CASTILLO, of legal age, Filipino and a resident of #7


Smoothie St., Brgy. Dreamscape, Lipa City, Batangas, after having duly
sworn to in accordance with law, do hereby depose and state:

1. That I am the Complainant in the above-entitled case;

2. That I have caused the preparation and filing of the foregoing


Complaint and I have read all the allegations therein which are true
and correct based on my personal knowledge and authentic
documents; and

3. That I further certify that there is no pending action or proceeding


involving the same issues in the Supreme Court, Court of Appeals,
or any other tribunal or agency. If I should thereafter learn that the
same or similar action is pending, I shall undertake to inform the
Honorable Court of this fact within five (5) days therefrom.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto affixed my signature.

JOSE CASTILLO
Affiant

SUBSCRIBED and SWORN to before me this 24th day of April


2024 at Lipa City, Batangas, by Affiant who personally appeared before me,
voluntarily executed this affidavit and read and understood the contents
thereof.

ATTY. VICTORIA ELIZABETH T. SANTOS


Counsel for the Complainant
Doc. No. ______ Roll of Attorney’s No. 020995 - 05/23/2010;
Page No. ______ IBP No. 127 - 1/18/2024 - Pasig City;
Book No. ______ P.T.R. No. 1234567- Lipa City;
Series of 2024. MCLE No. VIII-020196 - March 20, 2025

You might also like